Capital Improvement Committee
Regular MeetingLaconia, NH · October 18, 2016
Minutes
CITY OF LACONIA
PLANNING BOARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Meeting Minutes
Call to Order: Chairman Bill Contardo called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM.
In attendance were: Ava Doyle, Mike Foote, Gail Denio, Ham McClean, Paul Lambert, Robert
Hamel, and William Contardo.
Staff; Brandee Loughlin, Interim Planning Director and Wendy Patterson, Zoning
Technician/Recording Secretary.
Mr. Contardo explained that there have been some additions to the C.I.P spreadsheet and asked
the Committee if they would like to hear the new information.
MOTION: Mr. Hamel moved to accept the additional item to be heard regarding the Code
Enforcement vehicle. Seconded by Gail Denio. Motion carried unanimously in favor.
Copies of previous years approved budget were presented as well as copies of the items added to
the DPW CIP which is in addition to the previous budgetary request. Robert Hamel stated that
under Parks and Recs in 2017, that the Leavitt tennis courts and bleachers at Memorial park were
funded. Ava Doyle asked if the playground revitalization was done. Mr. Hamel said that it was.
Bill Contardo stated that this meeting will have Parks and Rec and DPW speak regarding their
requests.
Kevin Dunleavy, Director of Parks and Recreation, thanked the Committee for the opportunity to
make the presentation for the upcoming requests. His focus will be on future requests but also
asks that he be able to touch on the next years items that are being prioritized. One of the new
items that have been included in the program for 2017/2018 is the Community Center heating
system repairs. He explained that there is an oil hot steam system at the Laconia Senior Center
and he is not aware of any previous maintenance on the steam traps. Mr. Hamel said that he
thought it was converted to gas and Kevin said no. Bill asked when the last time was done. Kevin
stated that he did not know. He is looking to have the system surveyed to know what is needed
for repairs and the overall system.
Other new items for Parks and Rec: Two items have been combined in the 2019/2020 request,
replacement of Bond Beach Bathhouse and sewerage system disposal system, as the projects can
be done at the same time. It is anticipated that there would be a large savings in doing it that way.
1
Under the new requests 2021-2022, item #3 request for a field grooming tractor. It is a special
piece of equipment used to groom athletic skin areas, beaches and some walking trails. Currently
there is an equivalent model that is a 2005 that has been good but will need to be replaced based
on the amount of use due to all of the ballfields. It will have different attachments that will help
with efficiency. Request #5 is for the Smith track refurbishment based on an estimated timeframe
of the installer of when the track will need to be refurbished. It is not torn up but a coating needs
to be applied to cover the wear and tear. H. McClean stated that last year there was lengthy
discussion about how much the school uses the facilities and their reimbursement rates and how
the accounting may be changed to have the school budget show the cost of maintenance. Kevin
said their department is not reimbursed but has received some lump sum funds from the school
budget of around $5000 to help with fertilizer. He stated that at this time there is no formal
agreement or memorandum to work this out. H. McClean asked if this is between him (meaning
Kevin Dunleavy) and the school or if the City Council gets involved. Kevin Dunlevy believes
that at some point the City Council will get involved. H. McClean stated that as the population is
aging and the school population is decreasing that more and more the fields are being used
primarily for the schools and not the public. K. Dunleavy said that for budgeting reasons it is
important to know who is fiscally responsibly. Parks and Rec has implemented a work order
system that is helping to track the costs for specific activities whether related to the school or
youth sports. H. McClean inquired if the school make requests for repairs. Kevin said the school
will tell them if there is an issue but it does not make a formal request. The facilities have always
been under the parks and rec as the school district does not have adequate facilities. The school
department, when they improved Bobotas field, Opechee, and Leavitt, utilized grant funding to
assist in the upgrading of them. H. McClean said it seems better and more consistent to have
those that are utilizing the facilities and creating the costs for maintenance to pay for those
because it is not an accurate accounting. Mr. Hamel said there has been a lot of discussion about
this in the past but Kevin’s crew has taken over Bobotas field and the smaller field which is
primarily used by the schools. The sprinkler system at Opechee has been expanded and part of
the fields are actually school property that we maintain. H. McClean said it is not his intent to
take away from the schools but that there should be some maintenance reimbursement. He then
asked if the schools have a cheaper borrowing rate. Mr. Hamel said it is all negotiated through
the city by bonds with all major projects. Bill Contardo asked how Park & Rec got the bigger
scope of work. K. Dunleavy said that it is his knowledge that Parks and Recs has always
maintained the fields and the only new item is the lower field below Bobotas field. B. Contardo
asked how the youth programs are. Kevin said the City supports the youth league by field
maintenance and they (the leagues) pitch in for field paint. Non-town user fees are also assessed
so that that out of town participants have to pay a surcharge to use the field. He is guessing that
may be $20,000 over the past three years.
Kevin said that for 2022/2023 there are three new items; Item #1 tractor replacement to replace a
multipurpose tractor for snow removal, spreading of gravel, to groom beaches, and for some
field maintenance. It is used year round. Item #2 Endicott renovation, of the picnic areas, grass,
fencing , bench replacement, some paving and picnic table replacement. Ava Doyle inquired if
the special fund that has accumulated can be used. Kevin said there is a reserve account in
roughly the amount of $25,000 of the parking fees for the beach. Kevin said there is also a
reserve account from the sale of beach stickers that he said it is in about the $40-$50,000 range
2
and some was used for sand mitigation studies. H. McClean asked if that is still in progress.
Kevin said yes, it is broken up in to 2 phases to see potential costs and then the engineering
phase. DES wanted required a scientific answer as to what was happening to the beaches and
some measures to mitigate. He anticipated it would be a 5 year project and they are around that
time frame. Ava Doyle asked if when that project is completed, could the funds or bonding be
combined. Kevin said yes. He also put in for some bathhouse renovations. He finds that is more
palatable for the public when this is broken up in two phases. Ava Doyle said the TIF funds
should be paying for the Lakeside Ave projects and inquired if this could also be a TIF project .
Mike Foote asked how the vegetation and darkness of the bridge is handled. Kevin said that there
is some residual lighting from the parking lot but more needs to be done. Item #3 is the Wyatt
Park court reconstruction, it was resurfaced with a skim coat on the courts several years ago but
it is anticipated that they are nearing a total reconstruction in the near future. Mr. Hamel asked if
there are still funds in that account. Kevin believes there is approximately $6-7,000.00 in the
account. Mr. Hamel said it may be good to carry it forward for that project.
Kevin Dunleavy stated that he would like to review the request for the upcoming year. 2017-
2018, beach facilities drainage design phase, similar to what is being experienced at the Weirs,
Bartlett, Bond, Opechee Point and Opechee Cove are a particular problem for runoff and this
needs to be looked in to because there have been more and more complaints. To replenish the
beach, DES
requires that design work and research be done to implement a plan. Kevin Dunleavy said that
right now he feels the beaches are acceptable but he would like to start the process of design
work and what may be implemented to help keep the beaches in place. Bill Contardo inquired if
there is still a goose problem. Mr. Dunleavy stated that they are. Wildlife services has been
contacted because they (the geese) are migratory so therefore they are a federal issue. In previous
years they have suggested flare guns and other tactics, some of which work and some that do not.
Now they will look at a permit to have them removed. They are classified as “resident geese”
and the same flocks return year after year. He said Boston has the same issue and he is confident
the USDA will help to harvest when they are molting at the end of June. This is an expense that
will be passed to the City but it does need to be done sooner than later. Ava Doyle inquired what
is done with the harvested birds. Kevin Dunleavy said that as he understands, they are netted,
gassed and given for consumption but he is not sure that is human or animal consumption. Gail
Denio asked if any of the beaches are a safety issue. Kevin Dunleavy stated that they are not at
this time but the beach quality will become worse and will wear down to rock and dirt. We are
trying to prevent erosion. Bill asked if the $80,000 is a firm price. Kevin said it is an estimate
and he is assuming the costs will be $20,000.00 per beach. Bill Contardo clarified that the
drainage design is the $80k. Kevin Dunleavy explained that some of the beaches will cost a little
more for the elements for designing drainage swales and such. Bill Contardo asked what the
$200k proposed is for. Kevin Dunleavy stated that is an estimate for approximately $50k per
beach for construction and it is difficult to know the price exactly until we know what is
recommended and what will be permitted. Parks and Rec is also suggesting that a pedestrian
walkway be done from Main St to the middle school and along the edge of Smith Track. This
will help to cut down on the damage to the fields and track by the people cutting across them.
This is especially bad during the muddy season. B. Contardo asked who would plow the
walkway. K. Dunleavy stated that he has not asked DPW yet. Another issue is the fencing on
3
North Main from the cove area and down the road. The 6’ chain link fence is in disrepair and
Parks and Rec would like to install ornamental fencing, like the black rail fencing in the
downtown area, so it would be aesthetically pleasing and safe. Bill Contardo asked about lighting
in that area as he feels it is subdued. Kevin Dunleavy Confirmed that there is no lighting in the
park and he is not sure how much of a need there is. Bill Contardo stated that unbecoming
activities are happening in the darker areas and maybe by putting up lighting it would prevent
some of this from happening. Kevin said some lighting was put up in Wyatt park and this is
something that can be looked at. The basketball courts at Tardif and Sandborn are single courts
and they would like to put in striping for tennis and pickle ball and maybe basketball. They are
also exploring a centralized irrigation control system, there are over 20 irrigation heads now and
this would allow remote access to control the systems as well being able to troubleshoot the
systems so that they can find what needs to be done sooner. A contractor gave a bid that included
changing control boxes to be accessed remotely whether through data link, phone line, or
computer. Kevin said this could be done a little at a time. Mr. Hamel asked where the irrigation
project is at, Kevin said the bids are in and it will be started within two weeks and he can work
through November. Pricing came in about $1000 over budget but will be absorbed in the
operating budget.
Department of Public Works – Wes Anderson spoke on behalf of the DPW and presented a
powerpoint slide show. Laconia parking garage is still in place on the CIP with no amount until
an estimate comes through and Lakeside Ave has been removed from the CIP. The Court Street
reconstruction is presently slated to be $1.5 million but as there is big issue with the design firm
he suspects that project will be $2.17 million. H. McClean asked why the difference in estimate.
Wes said as a general rule you add 10% for increases per year. We have four bridge projects, two
have been picked up by the state of NH, Court and Academy street that is a cost share program,
state pays 80% we pay 20%. Messer Street inspection on 2016 shows we have decking and
abutment problems, the firm that did the study said $140k for design work and the city portion
will be $28k.
Soil and pavement consulting services; in house the core samples are being done and he has
requested $15k for this to be done for the sub soil testing. Mr. Hamel asked if UNH can help in
any way, Wes will look in to this and see if they have the equipment. Mr. Anderson explained
that the Public Works building has a lot of settlement. There were 4 core samples as to where salt
shed building could be placed and three of them were not good areas. It is suspected that the soil
underneath, peat, is not viable. DPW is asking for $10k to consult with an engineer to see what
could be done. Wes said DPW would also like to preserve some documents dating back to late
1800 to early 1900’s. These are the original road surveys and it is estimated that the cost is
approximately $14K. He feels it is very important to scan all of the documents in the fire
resistant room. Wes said the paper copies will be saved but they will also be digitized.
Project updates, Street repairs, and Pavement management program: basically the objective to
keep good roads good and not let them get to the point where they are a major cost to fix. They
are in process of sealing roads that were paved 1-5 years ago in order to help to mitigate potholes
and other issues. They are already doing this with some existing money. It is estimated that the
cost will be $50-$60K a year until they catch up. Surface treatments are thin layers of something
4
to keep the pavement fresh. There are other types of overlays and when nothing more can be
done then it is road reconstruction. Old North Main St, north of Marshall Court, is a problem,
when sewer work was being done they found some issues with the soil. What can be done
treatment wise is dependent on what he has in the way of pavement. It may need more stone
which increases elevation which means drainage will need to be modified. Bill Contardo
inquired how many are in bad shape. Wes said about 1/3 of the streets have minimum if not
sufficient bases. Court Street has not been tackled as of yet as they are waiting for traffic to
decrease. You will see more and more how they are planning to tackle a true maintenance and
management program.
Vehicle replacement: Some equipment they are not looking to replace in like kind unless it is
something that works well. For example an infrared truck to heat pavement to be brought up and
put back down as well as equipment that would help more departments. Another issue that may
be of concern is future impact and the price of trucks for Federal emissions changes, another of
which is anticipated in 2018. The last Federal change was pollution control for nitrous oxide and
it cost about $15,000 an engine for compliance. In regards to the Union Ave retaining wall, the
preliminary report is that the wall is safe and some issues are due to poor drainage. Monies are
being used for designs and they are waiting for estimates of how much it will cost. H. McClean
asked if it could be a share cost with the property owner. Wes Anderson said that we do not have
records of who originally built the walls, the city or the property owner. Ham McClean asked if
there is room between the right of way and the wall so that we may expand. It was explained that
there is a project tomorrow being done by Irwin Marine to stabilize the joint retaining wall. Mr.
McClean also asked why this could not be piggybacked with them to do the project all at once
because what they are doing is supporting the City’s footing. Wes said the major problem is
water flow. Mr. Hamel asked if a metal sheet would be driven in to mitigate. Wes said that may
be more expensive. Bill Contardo asked where the water would go. Wes Anderson said he plans
to head the water north toward the water facility to drain in to Paugus Bay. Bill Contardo asked
if it is a no salt area. Wes said not at this time. Mr. Hamel asked if Irwin has already started
construction, Wes said it will start tomorrow. Mr. Hamel asked if that will allow us the three feet
we need? Luke Powell said they (Irwin Marine) have been in contact with the city throughout
this process. He was on the technical review and gathering field data and such and they DPW
could not keep up with the Irwin’s pace of progress. Wes explained that they are changing their
grade for driveway and parking area. Mr. Hamel said they are leveling their parking lot. Wes
Anderson further explained that their only other option was to raise their building. H. McClean
asked if they will do anything to their drainage. Luke said yes, and that they are addressing
drainage on their side.
Court Street is targeted for 2020 and that will be taken in to consideration when looking at
design projects. At this point there is not a construction dollars program. Academy street is slated
for year 2022, the abutments are cracking. Hilliard street bridge is a single point of failure as it is
the only way to get in to 18 houses so they are asking for $20k this year so we can tell the State
we have funded it to get the process moving forward. There are two options for emergency,
Baily Bridge and/or put in a large box culvert.
Discussion was held on the Morin Road construction demo disposal site. Mr. Anderson stated
5
that he is not sure how many years it was used. He believes that it was last used in 2014 and it’s
estimated cost to remediate is $200,000. DPW does store granite curbing there.
Questions; Mike Foote asked if the list here is in the order of importance. Mr. Anderson said it is
not, the numbers for DPW is just a way of keeping track but it can be put in order of importance.
There is no sense in doing a design plan and then not having the money to move forward.
Discussion was held on the possibility of hazardous materials under Court Street. Mr. Anderson
said that may send the cost up but they will have to deal with DES on what they would want to
do. There is a question of the area starting at Durkee Brook to Strafford Oil, of possible
contamination. Mr. Hamel inquired if any of the service stations could be held responsible or if
this may be eligible for Brownfields funds? Wes Anderson said there is a different fund for these
issues. Bill Contardo stated that sidewalk repair and construction comes up every year. Mr.
Anderson said that for the long term we should do conceptually what the plan is for the
roadways. The other piece to the sidewalks is that if there is an overlay to the road then by ADA
law they are required to make the sidewalks meet the road and meet their standards. Bill
Contardo stated that there are many people coming before the Planning Board that we allow to
put money aside for sidewalks. Wes Anderson is not sure if from a policy side we use the money
in that area or if it can be utilized in other areas. Do the developers build the sidewalks first or do
they do it after a certain amount of houses were built? Mr. McClean inquired if developers put
the money in to a fund for future roads in lieu of building do they have to be used in that area.
Bill Contardo stated that we should find out the rules. Mr. Hamel inquired if on the streets
without defined sidewalks, when we go in to do reconstruction, would we be looking to put in
more sidewalks. Wes Anderson said we will have to do that but it will depend on how much
right of way we have.
Bill Contardo said the Planning Board should know how much money has been put aside and
where it is. Brandee Loughlin stated that she can get that information for next week.
Mr. Hamel said that the Council authorized more cameras to be put up at recycling center and
inquired if it is known if that has been done, as well as the one by Memorial Park. Wes Anderson
said he knows game cameras have been put out. They will be placed in multiple locations.
Brandee spoke on behalf of the proposed truck for Code Enforcement and thanked the
Committee for hearing the late submission. Ms. Loughlin explained that the truck is in bad shape
and is in with the mechanic to see what can be done for now. It is 13 years old and has 80k miles
on it. The truck is used every day in the city for inspections. Some complaints are that it slips out
of drive and in to neutral as well as some grinding noises in the front. The size of the truck has
been suitable until recently but now that building permits are picking up it is used more and the
Planning Department also uses it. The seat is coming apart with parts poking through. Mike
Foote asked if this is the Ford Ranger. B. Loughlin said that it is. Mr. Hamel asked if it has to be
a truck? Brandee Loughlin said yes and that there would also be a request for a locked tool box
as the Code Enforcement Officer does go out with equipment for use in inspections. Mike Foote
inquired if it will be a 2 wheel or 4 wheel drive truck. Brandee Loughlin stated that the Code
Enforcement Officer is not going on difficult to access sites and usually is on roads that have
already been cut in. If on the Planning end they are going to a site that would need 4 wheel drive
6
vehicle we would try to team up with DPW to get to the sites. H. McClean asked what vehicle
the property maintenance clerk uses to drive. Brandee Loughlin stated that he uses the Escapes
primarily. Gail Denio asked what is so large that it cannot go in an SUV. Brandee Loughlin said
possibly ladders and such. She further stated that she does not know the difference pricewise.
The other option is that maybe we can get a truck from another department that they are looking
to recycle. H. McClean asked what we did with old cruisers. Mr. Hamel said most got to state
auction if they cannot be used in house. Mr. Hamel asked if this will be added to the score sheet,
Brandee said yes and she will gather more info.
This public comment hearing will be on October 25th. Mike Foote asked if it is put on the Lakes
Region Access Channel. Brandee Loughlin said that she can ask that Nancy Brown do that. Bill
Contardo said there have been projects that have gotten interest over the years but in general the
public does not have many questions.
Brandee asked if anyone wanted the new scoring sheets mailed to them, otherwise they will be
sent via email. Hardcopies will be available tomorrow and they will also be sent electronically.
MOTION: Mr. Hamel moved to adjourn. Seconded by Mike Foote. Motion carried unanimously
in favor.
Meeting adjourned at 8:15pm
Respectfully submitted,
Wendy L. Patterson
Recording Clerk
7
Agenda
NOTICE
CITY OF LACONIA
PLANNING BOARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
6:30 PM
Laconia City Hall Conference Room 200B
45 Beacon Street East, Laconia
AGENDA
0. Call to Order
1. Review of Meeting Minutes from 10/12/2016
3. Park and Recreation Department
4. Department of Public Works
5. Other Business
Get email alerts for Laconia
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.