Board of Works
Regular MeetingLafayette, IN · September 6, 2016
Minutes
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY
MINUTES
September 6, 2016
Regular Session:
The Board of Public Works and Safety met in regular session on Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
in the Common Council Chambers. Members present were: Gary Henriott, Cindy Murray, Norm
Childress, Ron Shriner and Dawn Ross.
Ed Chosnek, City Attorney, was also present.
President Henriott called the meeting to order.
The Pledge of Allegiance was given to the flag of our Country.
MINUTES
Mrs. Murray moved for approval of the minutes from the August 30, 2016 regular meeting. Mrs. Ross
seconded. Passed.
QUOTE OPENING
Alabama Street Gutter Replacement
President Henriott stated that there were no quotes submitted.
OLD BUSINESS
Special Event Request-OUTFest Revised Request (tabled 8/30/16)
Mr. Shriner moved to remove this item from the Table. Mr. Childress seconded. Removed. Margy
Deverall, OUTFest Co-Chair, presented to the Board and recommended approval of a Special Event
Request for OUTFest. Mrs. Deverall stated that the revision includes the street closure requesting to
change the closure time for Main Street, between 4th & 6th Streets, and 5th Street north of Main only. This
will alleviate potential conflicts with customers (not vendors) parked on those blocks for the Farmers
Market and reduce or eliminate the likelihood of having to tow cards in order to begin the early setup.
Mrs. Deverall stated that the 2nd Good Neighbor Letter was handed out to businesses affected by the time
change request and answered any questions that arose about that letter. Mr. Shriner moved for approval.
Mrs. Ross seconded. Passed.
NEW BUSINESS
Engineering
Recommendation for Award-2016 Fall Tree and Right of Way Planting Project (Re-Bid)
Leanne Wells, Urban Forester, presented to the Board and recommended approval of a Recommendation
for Award for the 2016 Fall Tree and Right of Way Planting Project (Re-Bid) with Custom Cuts Lawn
Care Inc. in the amount of $71,882.15. Mr. Shriner moved for approval. Mr. Childress seconded. Passed.
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 2
Contract-2016 Fall Tree and Right of Way Planting Project (Re-Bid)
Ms. Wells presented to the Board and recommended approval of a Contract for the Fall Tree and Right of
Way Planting Project (Re-Bid) with Custom Cuts Lawn Care Inc. in the amount of $71,882.15. Mrs.
Murray moved for approval. Mrs. Ross seconded. Passed.
Notice Proceed-2016 Fall Tree and Right of Way Planting Project (Re-Bid)
Ms. Wells presented to the Board and recommended approval of a Notice to Proceed for the 2016 Fall
Tree and Right of Way Planting Project (Re-Bid). Ms. Wells stated that the work will begin sometime
between mid-September/mid-October with working be complete in November. Mr. Childress moved for
approval. Mr. Shriner seconded. Passed.
Change Order #2-Big Four Depot Renovations
Jenny Leshney, Public Works Director, presented to the Board and recommended approval of Change
Order #2 for the Big Four Depot Renovations. The change order is a deduction of ($574.94). Mrs. Ross
moved for approval. Mrs. Murray seconded. Passed.
Inspection Contract –South Street and Scott Street Intersection
Mrs. Leshney presented to the Board and recommended approval of an Inspection Contract for the South
Street and Scott Street Intersection with TBird Designs in the amount of $64,500.00. Mrs. Leshney stated
that this project will be bid out in January 2017. Mrs. Ross moved for approval. Mr. Childress seconded.
Passed.
CLAIMS
Mike Jones, Controller, presented for Board approval, Claims in the amount of $6,115,964.99. President
Henriott asked if there were any further questions and there were none. Mr. Childress moved for
approval. Mr. Shriner seconded. Passed.
DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES
Information Technology
Andy Milam, IT Director, gave the follow update:
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 3
Marketing
Kara Bishop, Marketing Director, gave the following update:
This November marks two years since the creation of the Communications Department for the City of
Lafayette. It has been an honor to develop and cultivate a communications and marketing component for
the city that not only supports each city department's communications needs, but also provides
comprehensive awareness, education and transparency for our residents and visitors.
Why Communications AND Marketing?
The world is changing and local government has a tremendous opportunity to transform their role by
taking their cities to the next level, both locally and globally. It is not enough for government to just
communicate. In order to compete in a global economy we must also market our city. We must think and
act like a business by celebrating accomplishments, actively competing for industry and growth and
aggressively selling quality of life.
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 4
The mission of the City of Lafayette Communications Department is to connect and communicate with a
variety of audiences, across multiple platforms, on a consistent basis with the goal of educating, engaging
and entertaining.
EDUCATING:
An informed public is an educated public. We strive to not only tell people, but tell them why. This
strategy allows us to own the message and stress the importance of community awareness and how each
city project/program benefits each individual.
ENGAGING:
Our communication/marketing must be pro-active. We connect through a variety of content, as well as a
variety of platforms. From traditional media to social media, communication must happen on many levels
and each outreach must be communicated differently, depending on delivery, to achieve ultimate
engagement and citizen support and empowerment.
ENTERTAINING:
We have some amazing stories to tell. From department specific, to city-wide, we are dedicated to telling
the stories that make our services and our community unique and special. We use a variety of creative
components from photos to video, even live event coverage, to accomplish above average results.
So what have we been doing for the last 2 years?
• City website redesign and content development - launch July 2015
- monthly average page views: 55,796; uniques 42,725
• City app design and content development - launch February 2016
- to date we have 1,023 downloads
• Developed comprehensive social media strategy for city specifically on Facebook and Twitter,
cultivated positive/supportive environment, posts follow a strategic audience profiling and analytics data
strategy along with buying strategies, even time of day driven content
- Likes on Facebook have gone from 2,153 to 7,883 (+5,730), monthly reach 15,800
- Consistently reach more than 7,500 people on Facebook every day, 43 cities
- Post reach averages 5,000-10,000 depending on content, highest reach to date was 167,000
for bridge explosion (went viral), also did several contests
- Facebook engagement highlights include road projects, staff awareness, community initiatives
and downtown development
- Followers on Twitter have gone from 2,700 to 5,253 (+2,553)
- Average 100,000 impressions each month
- Twitter engagement highlights include local news, sports/recreation, and shares with
crime/safety (LPD)
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 5
- BUY examples, analytics/profile driven, success with workforce: GE hiring/awareness 66,528,
SIA hiring 47,086 and Fort Campbell 15,307, strategize though demographics, age, interests and
job availability (message+audience+low$= huge impact)
- If you combine all of the city social media platforms we reach 33,400 every day
• Covered hundreds of local events (both city generated & other) as well as awareness support for local
business announcements (GLC partnership)
• Hub for media notices and press releases
• Supported and developed communication and marketing strategies for a variety of department specific
projects
• Media outreach and public relations
• Presentation design/development and event planning
• Graphic design and photography
• Press conferences
• Community Safety and Crime Prevention communications strategy with LPD (launched September
2015)
• Economic, workforce and talent development outreach
• Industry support initiatives
• Provide quotes and content for media coverage
• Campaign/project development (just to name a few)
- America's Best Communities project
- Recycling and new toter awareness
- Downtown merchant awareness, shop owner stories and shop video
- "Likes" campaign on FB with Almost Home Humane Society and others
- Mayor's Youth Council video series
- Restore Sagamore communication/online development
- Main Street Streetscape marketing campaign and Will/Marq video series
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 6
- Water Wisdom, weekly social media campaign
- Parks events and programing (Art in the Park, Walking Towards Wellness)
- Utility Billing new billing service transition and Citizen Self Service feature
How have we grown?
Approximately 10 months into the first year of the Communications Department, it was evident we
needed to expand and realign/develop some marketing presence for other departments (specifically
parks). A Marketing Coordinator position was developed and we hired Stacey Baisden in October 2015.
Stacey has taken on the role of overseeing marketing for parks and specifically the event development for
the Art in the Park art and music festival series, as well as backup support for city
communications/marketing as assigned. Also under the communications/marketing umbrella comes a
part-time marketing manager for the parks and the zoo.
What's next?
See above. Momentum is building. Our audiences not only appreciate the increased levels of
communication, but they have more importantly come to expect it. We are engaging with more people
than ever before. It is an exciting time as we continue to offer internal department-specific support and
strengthen our focus externally on the areas of workforce and talent development, community safety and
quality of life, all while staying on top of government communications research and social media trends.
In closing I would like to reiterate that this department exists because of everyone in this room and I am
personally so thankful for how you have all embraced the Communications Department. Our sole purpose
is to support the great things our government and our community do every single day. Everything matters.
We will never run out of stories to tell. Thank you!
Time: 9:30 a.m.
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY
APPEAL MINUTES
September 6, 2016
Appeal Hearing:
The Board of Public Works and Safety met on Tuesday, September 6 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in the Common
Council Chambers. Members present were: Gary Henriott, Cindy Murray, Dawn Ross, Norm Childress
and Ron Shriner
Ed Chosnek, City Attorney, was also present.
President Henriott reconvened the Board of Works meeting.
Animal Control Appeal for Hornor
Jesse Leroy Hornor (tenant and dog owner), Wendy Jo Allen (landlord), ACO Josh Klumpe and ACO
Jenna Manuel were all present.
Ed Chosnek stated that the Board has received a packet that includes all call and history of Mr. Hornor
and his various dogs going back to 2012. Mr. Chosnek stated that the first incident report was filed on
March 14, 2012 where a caller made a call that there was a brown dog that was running loose in her
neighborhood for the past 6 days and has appeared to have chewed through a rope that it may have been
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 7
tied to. ACO Randy Hale, now retired, handled that call and spoke with Mr. Hornor at that time. Mr.
Hornor explained that the dog broke its leash and jumped the fence. ACO Hale stated in the report that
there wasn’t anything particular wrong.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next call happened on October 24, 2012 where there was a call about dogs
fighting. It turns out that the call was made by a friend of Mr. Hornor’s daughter. Two of the dogs that
were owned by Mr. Horner were fighting over food but everything settled down by the time that ACO
Hale arrived.
Mr. Chosnek stated that on April 10, 2013 there was a call and report that there was a loose pit-bull
chasing a lady into a house. An LPD officer was dispatched to the call because the ACO’s were off duty
at the time. The dog was friendly but they had a difficult time getting back into its home. This is another
incident showing that the owner did not maintain the animal on its property.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next call happened on June 21, 2013 where there was a call made that a
neighbor was bit by another neighbor’s dog. The LPD assisted the call but there was not anything further
done. Apparently the neighbor was in the ER at St. Elizabeth Central.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next call happened was on November 16, 2013 where there was a call about a
dog was not on a leash, out running around and looked injured. The dog has a leash attached to it and the
dog was dragging it around. The neighbor was afraid and ran from it, but was not bitten. Mr. Chosnek
stated that the dog went back to the owner’s home and the owner was advised to keep the dog maintained
on their property under control.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next incident happened on June 2, 2014 where there was a call made about
multiple dogs outside in the rain. At that time ACO Manuel went out and found two (2) dogs that were
outside in the rain, the owner indicated that there were dog houses that they could get in. When ACO
went around to the back of the home she noticed a third dog in the garage. The owner advised that the in-
tact male was in the garage does not get along with the other dogs so the dog was kept in the garage. ACO
Manuel advised the owner that neutering the dog would make things better.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next call was made on August 1, 2014 where there was a call about the dogs
that were not being taken care of. ACO Baldwin assisted with that call where he checked the two dogs in
the backyard. One of the older dogs has flea bites, ACO Baldwin went back several times to check on the
older dog, Sparky, but discovered the dog was deceased either from old age or improper care.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next report happened on August 8, 2014 where ACO Klumpe assisted the
call. ACO Klumpe found a dog asleep in the front yard; not on a leash or fenced in area.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next call was made on January 7, 2015 where the temperatures were a below
freezing day. The call was about a dog outside in the harsh temperatures/conditions. ACO Manuel
advised the owner that if the dog continues to be left outside there will citations issued and depending on
the situation, the dog could be ceased for by virtue of mistreatment and improper ownership. The dog in
question was the sheltie/collie named “Buster”. Mr. Chosnek stated that with all of these calls there were
never any citations issued. Basically the ACO’s attempted to educate the owners regarding proper care
and treatment of their animals.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next report happened on April 3, 2015 where a call was made to LPD and
said “would you send somebody to shut-up the neighbor’s dogs” and then hung up. So there was not
much information about the caller but the LPD officer went to the home talked to the owners and told the
owner that they needed to keep them inside or quiet.
Mr. Chosnek stated that the next report happened on November 21, 2015 where there was a call that there
were two dogs and 5-6 puppies that were outside and concern for the condition of the dogs. ACO Manuel
assisted with the call. Mr. Chosnek stated that these last two or three reports are the real reason of the
removal. The prior history is a history to show that there have been many efforts to attempt to educate the
owners regarding the proper responsibility and need to care. Mr. Chosnek stated that there are two dogs
and 5-6 puppies were inside the home. ACO Manuel stated that there were 5-6 puppies outside in a
window well, two adult dogs; a black female pit-bull named “Niko” and a tan male sheltie/collie mix
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 8
named “Buster” and if anything was at all wrong the dogs should be taken. ACO’s went and checked to
make sure the dogs were not going to be left outside and will continue checking again. Mr. Chosnek
stated that this particular dog got pregnant again less than a year later. ACO got a call that there were 5
puppies running around in front of the house on the road on August 21, 2016. The report indicates that
ACO Manuel noticed 5 puppies running in the road in front of 2810 Elk Street. She was able to catch 3 of
the 5 puppies where the other 2 reentered the fenced area where apparently there was a gap in the fence.
ACO Manuel attempted to contact the owner of the puppies which is Mr. Hornor. No contact was made at
the door. While standing on the front porch ACO Manuel witnessed the front window having a message
in pink window paint. The message read “If you want them come get them. 2 free puppies. Don’t hesitate.
Pitbull mix.” ACO Manuel then noticed 2 bowls that were placed on the porch that where empty and
could not locate any water for the animals. There were 3 other dogs there; a black female pit-bull named
“Niko”, a tan male sheltie/collie mix named “Buster” and a third dog located in the garage named
“Mack”. There was no way to secure the puppies so ACO Manuel removed them. Mr. Hornor was issued
a citation for the puppies running at large and for lack of care and provisions. Then the 5 puppies were
transported to Almost Home Humane Society (AHHS).
Mr. Chosnek had ACO Manuel come to the podium and go over the pictures of the dogs, house and living
conditions that were in the packet. ACO Manuel stated that she transported the 5 puppies to AHHS and
where then seen by a medical personnel on staff so the puppies could be checked for fleas and injuries. In
the first picture of the all the puppies standing on the scale it was right after they were fed. When AHHS
placed bowls on the floor full of wet dogfood the puppies basically attacked the bowls which is an
indication that they have not been fed in a while.
ACO Manuel went through the pictures describing all 5 puppies to the Board. Puppy #1 is an in-tact black
male with patches of fur missing on his head and had fleas. All of the puppies were infested with fleas.
Before AHHS started medical on puppy #1 he actual had a bowel movement which contained Styrofoam
and plastic. Puppy #2 is an in-tact black/white female with fleas and missing fur on her lip and spots
where she was digging at her fur from the flea bites. Puppy #3 is an in-tact black female with fleas and
missing several patches on fur on the top of her head and she was very itchy. ACO Manuel stated that she
was one of the worst of the three puppies so far. Her skin was extremely sensitive. Puppy #4 is an in-tact
brown female with fleas with several bites to her ears and also 2 missing/broken canine teeth. Puppy #5 is
an in-tact white/brown female with fleas.
Mr. Chosnek asked ACO Manuel to go over the condition of the 3 adult dogs. ACO Manuel stated that
she did a follow-up the next day with ACO Klumpe to check on the wellbeing of the adult dogs because
there was not food or water the day before. At that time ACO Manuel issued a citation so it can stand as a
24-hour notice that way the owner could contact her and once again discuss the lack of provisions. When
ACO Manuel and ACO Klumpe arrived on scene they were greeted at the gate by the sheltie/collie and
pit-bull. When they entered the yard they saw one empty bowl. There was another bowl with an inch or
two of water but it was very dirty. Later they discovered that one of the neighbors actually filled that with
water because they didn’t have any yesterday.
ACO Manuel stated that the first picture is a front picture of the house when you walk up. There is lots of
debris, plastic and trash in the yard. This picture was taken on the day that she and ACO Klumpe arrived
on scene. The next picture is a picture of the pink message written on the front window. The next picture
shows that both bowls were completely empty. The next picture shows the in-tact male lab mix named
“Mack” in the garage. In the picture you can see that the dog’s living space is very cluster/compact with
buckets, miscellaneous items and a large amount of dog feces. The feces had started to turn grey and fuzz
over which indicates that the feces had been there for some time. ACO Manuel stated that later that day
when she returned after making contact with Mr. Hornor, he was cooperative and did help remove the
animal and placed Mack into her truck. Another picture was taken after the dog was taken to show what
the garage looks like with feces laying on the floor from the front of the garage where the door is to the
back. ACO Manuel stated that Mr. Hornor’s appeal stated that he wants Mack back. Every time that ACO
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 9
is called to the home Mack has been in the garage. ACO Manuel stated that based on the amount of feces
it appears that Mack never is let out of the garage. Other pictures on file are of the house, yard and kennel
system. ACO Manuel stated that there were 2 dog houses in the back of the house which one was inside a
kennel system. The kennel system was closed and the door was closed with a propane tank blocking the
door. ACO Manuel stated that all 3 of the adult dogs were then ceased at that time. Mack was fear
aggressive in the sense due to him being in the garage for so long, he was very nervous. Mr. Hornor did
help ACO Manuel put Mack into her truck. ACO Manuel stated that once she brought Mack to the shelter
they did not do medical on him at that time because he was so fear aggressive. The dog today is very
friendly and the staff at AHHS loves him and has had no issues with him. Mr. Chosnek stated that the dog
is not the problem in this particular case, it is his care and treatment. ACO Manuel stated that with the
proper care and socialization he has been a very friendly dog. All 3 adult dogs were infested with fleas.
ACO Manuel issued a citation to Mr. Horner on August 21, 2016 when the puppies were running loose in
the street with no provisions provided. Each of those are separate offenses that were assessed a fine of
$200.00 each for a total ticket of $400.00. And on August 22, 2016 when ACO Manuel removed the 3
adult dogs she issued Mr. Hornor a citation regarding animal care for 2 dogs left without proper
provisions with a fine amount of $500.00. There are 2 citations one for $400.00 and one for $500.00
which have not been paid to date. In all of the prior contacts with Mr. Horner with LPD or the ACOs it
was all in efforts to get compliance with proper care and treatment of dogs. And in only the last instance
did the ACOs issued tickets.
ACO Klumpe stated that you can tell by the history that they have been called there a lot. Up and to the
point of the dogs being removed the ACOs felt not taken seriously by Mr. Horner. ACO Klumpe stated
that compliance only went so far and then it came to a head on August 21 & 22, 2016. Mr. Childress
asked a question regarding the report on June 21, 2013 and April 10, 2013. Mr. Childress stated that the
case has been sufficiently made for poor care of the animals but these two reports appear to be safety
issues. ACO Klumpe stated that the fence isn’t all that secure and the dogs are able to get out easily. ACO
Klumpe stated that LPD responded to the call on June 21, 2013 and was unsure if there was follow-up to
the bite.
Mr. Hornor, 2810 Elk Street, stated that the incident with the dog chasing the lady back to her house was
not his dog. He didn’t get his current pit-bull until 3-4 years ago and that it belonged to his daughter’s
friend. Mr. Hornor’s daughter’s friend moved away so he assumed custody of the dog. The 3 adult dogs
and 5 puppies belong to him. The pit-bull and the puppies were his and then gave the pit-bull to another
guy but the guy brought it back a couple days later because he was moving into an apartment with no
pets. Mr. Hornor told that guy that they would take care of the dog until he got another place and was
paying Mr. Hornor $50.00 per month and some dog food. That payment arrangement happened one time
and then the guy disappeared. Mr. Hornor stated that in the meantime all this other stuff happened with
the pit-bull, sheltie/collie and Mack. Mr. Shriner stated that these pictures are of your backyard and no
matter who the dogs belong to they are in your yard and you are responsible for them. Mr. Shriner stated
that this is wrong, out of control and not acceptable. Mr. Hornor stated that he was taking Mack out in the
evenings because he works all day long. Mack doesn’t like other dogs which is why he was in the garage.
Mr. Chosnek asked Mr. Hornor how long Mack has been in the garage. Mr. Hornor stated approximately
2 years in the garage but has had Mack for the past 10 years. Mr. Hornor stated that he can take care of
Mack if he is the only dog that he has. Mr. Hornor stated that his oldest daughter is home all the time and
is pretty good with the dogs.
Mr. Shriner moved to deny the appeal and ownership rights are terminated. Mrs. Murray seconded.
Denied. Mr. Hornor asked if he was allowed to have others dogs now. Mr. Chosnek explained that this
appeal was for Mack’s return only and has been denied. Your rights are not impacted but if Mr. Hornor
does have another dog and it’s found in this kind of condition that there will likely be criminal charges
Board of Public Works and Safety
September 6, 2016
Page 10
added. ACO Klumpe stated that this has been turned over to the prosecutor and could possible go in front
of a Judge. The Judge will make that determination whether Mr. Hornor would be allowed to have dogs in
Tippecanoe County.
Time: 10:10 a.m.
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY
Gary Henriott s/s
President
ATTEST: Mindy Miller s/s
Mindy Miller, 1st Deputy Clerk
Minutes written by Mindy Miller, 1st Deputy Clerk
*A digital audio recording of this meeting is available in the Lafayette City Clerk’s Office.
**A list of all permits issued for the preceding week is available at
http://lafayette.in.gov/2085/7400/Weekly-Permit-Reports?activeLiveTab=widgets
Get email alerts for Lafayette
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.