City Council

SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AND CITY PLANING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JULY 11, 2017 CITY HALL 22710 E. COUNTRY VISTA DRIVE 7:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. CALL TO ORDER 4. ROLL CALL 5. AGENDA APPROVAL 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 7. WORKSHOP DISCUSSIONS  Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories – Freeway Commercial and Light Industrial (CPA2017-0001) 8. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT 9. ACTION ITEMS i. Approve Task Order in the amount of $7,500 to include a pool concept for Orchard Park by SPVV 10. FIRST READ ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 242 – adopting the 2016 - 2017 City Comprehensive Plan Amendment 11. INTRODUCTION OF UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS 12. CITIZEN COMMENTS 13. ADJOURNMENT The public is invited to attend. Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City at 755-6700 with 24-hours advance notice for special accommodations. WORKSHOP DISCUSSION MATERIAL City of Liberty Lake, Washington Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting July 11, 2017 Comprehensive Planning Overview 1. Periodic Review and Update Process 2. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3. Subsequent Project Specific Development Review 1. Periodic Review and Update Process  The City is required to periodically review and update its Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations in accordance with the provisions of the Washington State Growth Management Act.  The Comprehensive Plan is a management tool that includes a Vision Statement, Goals, and Policies that describe the preferred future for the City of Liberty Lake.  The Development Regulations implement the Comprehensive Plan and include the processing procedures, permitted uses, and standards applicable to development activities in the City. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  The City initiated a process to update its Comprehensive Plan in the Spring of 2015. This process included:  A review to determine what, if any, changes needed to be made in order to remain in compliance with the Laws of Washington State.  A review by the City Management Team.  A review by local service providers.  A review by local developers and businesses. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  A Joint City Council/Planning Commission review meeting.  Numerous public meetings conducted by the Planning Commission to discuss potential amendments.  Preparation of draft amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.  A review of the draft amendments by the Planning Commission.  State agency review of the proposed amendments.  An environmental review of the proposed amendments. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  A public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission.  The Planning Commission recommending amendments to the City Council for final review and approval.  The City Council approving the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan on October 6, 2015.  By in large, the feedback received was very supportive of the general direction of the City and the Comprehensive Plan. As a result the proposed amendments primarily streamlined the document to make it more user friendly and did not include significant changes in the Goals and Policies of the City. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued) City of Liberty Lake Vision Statement The Liberty Lake community will maintain an environment that preserves and enhances natural surroundings through the harmony of planned architectural design and green space. Our community will achieve its quality of life by creating a safe, friendly environment in which community involvement promotes recreational opportunities and civic pride. Liberty Lake encourages and supports leading edge technology and a progressive business environment, which ensures a diverse, prosperous, and financially secure community. -Amended Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan, October 6, 2015 Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  Following the adoption of the amended Comprehensive Plan, the City initiated a process in the Spring of 2016 to review and update its Development Regulations. This process included:  A review to determine what changes needed to be made to ensure that the regulations remained consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.  A review to determine what, if any, changes needed to be made in order to remain in compliance with the Laws of Washington State.  A review by the City Management Team. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  A review by local service providers.  A review by local developers and businesses.  A Joint City Council/Planning Commission review meeting.  Numerous public meetings conducted by the Planning Commission to discuss potential amendments.  Preparation of draft amendments to the Development Regulations. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  The adoption of a moratorium on mixed-use multi-family developments so that the Planning Commission could conduct a special review of multi-family housing development standards.  A review of the draft amendments by the Planning Commission.  State agency review of the proposed amendments.  An environmental review of the proposed amendments.  A public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  The Planning Commission recommending amendments to the City Council for final review and approval.  The City Council approving the amendments to the Development Regulations on June 20, 2017.  The amendments included 17 changes to the City’s Development Regulations, including:  Prohibiting certain uses including RV parks and mini-storage in the Industrial Zone.  Clarifying numerous development standards including the multi- family housing standards. Periodic Review and Update Process (Continued)  Reducing the maximum building height to 70’ in the I, C-1, and C-2 zones.  The City has now completed its state mandated review and update of its Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations. No further action is required.  The next state mandated review and update must be completed before June 30, 2025.  In the interim, the City may solicit proposals and consider amendments once a year, through a process known as docketing. 2. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment  During the process of reviewing and updating the Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations a developer applied for and received a conditional use permit to construct a RV park in the Industrial zone on a parcel fronting Appleway Avenue, just west of Altek.  This project is vested under the Development Regulations in place at the time the application was submitted and deemed to be complete.  The approved project includes 120 RV pads, a tent area, an office / rec building, pool, tot lot, other amenities, and an 8’ frontage fence / wall.  RV’s are limited to 30 days occupancy in one place.  Similar projects could not be permitted in the Industrial zone under the amended Development Regulations. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Continued)  After receiving a Conditional Use Permit for the RV park, the developer advised the City that he had an option to acquire several parcels north of his proposed RV park, and that as an alternative to the RV park, he would like to build a mixed use development with multi-family housing and an RV park.  The original parcels are zoned Light Industrial (I) and the additional parcels are zoned Light Industrial (I) and Freeway Commercial (C-2).  Multi-family housing is not a permitted use in either the C-2 or I zone and RV Parks are currently not permitted in either zone. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Continued)  As a result, the only way a mixed use development of this type could be permitted at this site would be through a planned unit development or PUD.  A PUD is a zoning overlay that is similar to a special area plan or a master planned development.  One of the purposes of a PUD is to Encourage innovative planning that results in more mixed use development, improved protection of open spaces, and greater housing and transportation options.  The Meadowwood development is an example of a PUD and the River District and Stonehill developments were approved through a process similar to a PUD. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Continued)  However, the PUD regulations limit uses to those permitted in the underlying zoning district and those specifically identified in the Comprehensive Plan.  Since multi-family housing and RV parks are not permitted in the C-2 and I zones, then the Comprehensive Plan must specifically identify them as permitted uses.  The Comprehensive Plan states that Residential uses would typically not be allowed within the freeway commercial category and makes no reference to multi-family housing in the Light Industrial zone. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Continued)  After considerable deliberation, the Planning Commission has recommended that the Comprehensive Plan be amended as follows:  Freeway Commercial – The Freeway Commercial classification designates intensive commercial areas to draw customers from outlying areas….Residential uses would typically not be allowed within the freeway commercial category, but transient housing (i.e. RV park and hotel/motel, intended for rental less than 30 days) may be permitted in mixed use, planned unit developments, south of I-90 and west of Madson Street, to support and complement the Central Business district and surrounding businesses. Light industrial areas may be allowed in this category. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Continued)  Light Industrial – The Light Industrial category is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and internal and community compatibility. Light industrial areas are comprised of predominantly industrial uses such as manufacturing and high technology-oriented businesses, but may incorporate office, commercial, and mixed use, planned unit developments that support and complement the industrial area. Multi- family housing and transient housing may be permitted mixed use, planned unit developments west, of Madson Street, to support and complement the central business district and surrounding businesses. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Continued)  If these amendments are approved then any property owner with property zoned C-2 or I, south of I-90 and west of Madson Street, including the sponsor of the approved RV park, could submit a project specific application for a mixed use, planned unit development that included a hotel/motel, RV park, and/or multi-family housing.  If the amendments are not approved, project specific PUD applications for properties zoned C-2 or I could only include uses permitted in the Table of Permitted Uses. No multi-family developments or additional RV parks could be permitted in these zones. 3. Subsequent Project Specific Development Review  If the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are approved, then Project Sponsors could submit an application for a project specific mixed use, planned unit development for parcels zoned C-2 or I, south of I-90 and west of Madson Street for City review and approval. These applications would be processed as a Type III application, which includes:  A Consistency Review to determine if the proposal is consistent with the provisions of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations.  The distribution of a Notice of Application. Subsequent Project Specific Development Review (Continued)  A SEPA threshold determination and environmental review, as applicable.  An open record public hearing conducted by the City Hearing Examiner.  Written Findings of Fact and a recommendation from the Hearing Examiner to the City Council.  Review and approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the PUD application by the City Council.  If approved, the execution of a Binding Site Plan, Development Agreement, or other means of documenting the conditions of approval. Subsequent Project Specific Development Review (Continued)  It should also be noted, that prior to the incorporation of Liberty Lake, Spokane County approved a Binding Site Plan for a 100-acre commercial and industrial mixed use development generally in the area of East Appleway Avenue, North Madson Street and North Molter Road. This development is known as Liberty Lake Center.  Development in Liberty Lake Center is subject to private covenants, as well as private design guidelines, and owners association bylaws.  The City is not a party to these private covenants, design guidelines, or by-laws and has no enforcement authority. Implementation of these provisions is solely the responsibility of the property owners. Summary  The City has completed the state mandated review of its Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations. No further action is required at this time.  The City Planning Commission has recommended an amendment to the City Comprehensive Plan that would enable owners of property zoned C-2 and/or I, located south of I-90 and west of Madson Street, to submit project specific, mixed use, planned unit development applications for City review.  If the amendment is approved, then applications for project specific, mixed use, planned unit developments that could include a hotel/motel, RV park, and/or multi-family housing would be processed as Type III applications and subject to City Council review and approval. For more information, please contact: Gregg Dohrn 206-679-7507 or greggdohrn@comcast.net G.R. Dohrn and Associates  LL WINE CELLARS MCKINZIE BUSINESS PARK PROPOSED RV PARK INSIGHT TI TOWN STCU SQUARE TI  Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan Revised Land Use Chapter 5 Planning Commission Recommendation April 12, 2017 A. Introduction The Land Use Chapter sets the stage for a vibrant, sustainable, family-orientated community through the balanced allocation of land for housing, commerce, industry, recreation, transportation, open space, cultural resources, and other uses. It accommodates growth, while preserving the character of established neighborhoods and protecting them from intrusion of incompatible uses by using innovative land development concepts and techniques. City of Liberty Lake Existing Land Area and Use Existing Residential: Residential development within the city limits of Liberty Lake began back in the late 1970's with the start of the Liberty Lake Heights subdivision. Unlike developments that would soon follow, the Heights was not a Planned Unit Development (PUD), however the neighborhood did have covenants that governed the neighborhood. By 1987, full scale development had begun with the Homestead and Meadowwood subdivisions. By August 31, 2001, when the City officially incorporated, the majority of the City had PUD residential neighborhoods. Most of these neighborhoods were considered low to medium density residential units. Only a small portion of the residences within the City were high density residential. The majority of the residences within the City are located north of Sprague Avenue, south of Mission, and east of Liberty Lake Road, with Country Vista and Molter Road intersecting them. Existing Commercial: The City has numerous professional offices and retail businesses with more commercial developments planned and or under construction. Commercial land is found along Liberty Lake Road, Country Vista, Mission, Harvard Road, Knox Avenue, and Appleway. The highly intensive commercial use designations occur along Appleway, Liberty Lake Road, and Country Vista. The retail commercial development is mostly on a regional scale and consists of two anchored retail strip centers on Liberty Lake Road and two unanchored retail strip centers, one on the eastern end of Appleway and one on Mission at the north end of town. There are various freestanding retail, food service, auto dealerships, and hospitality operations in the vicinity of the retail strip centers. Existing Industrial: Industrial uses within the City are light industrial uses such as electronics, high tech, and assembly manufacturing. Several pieces of industrial land are being used for commercial uses. The industrial area is located north of Mission Avenue and south of Interstate 90. There are five major corridors located in the industrial area consisting of Madson, Appleway, Molter, Mission and Knox. Existing Open Space and Recreation: Since the majority of the area within the city limits began as a master planned satellite community, a large portion of the land has open space and recreational uses. Within the City, there are three golf courses and Pavilion Park, a large City park that is utilized for many community activities. Pavillion Park is located on the southwest corner of Country Vista and Molter Road within the residential area. Meadowwood Golf Course runs through the residential area and is north of Valleyway and east of Molter Road Liberty Lake Golf Course is the oldest course and it is located south of Valleyway, east of Molter Road, and north of Sprague Avenue with residences on eastern side. The City's Trailhead Golf Course, formerly known as ValleyView, is located at the eastern edge of Liberty  Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan Revised Land Use Chapter 5 PC Recommendation April 12, 2017 Lake Rd, south of Country Vista, and on the western edge of residences. The City contains a trail system and smaller neighborhood parks throughout as well as access to the Centennial Trail on our north side. City of Liberty Lake Future Land Use The City of Liberty Lake is unique in that all residential areas of the City have been platted or have an approved special area plan to guide the nature and intensity of future development. As a result, it is possible to calculate the population of the City at build-out as approximately 16,000. Planning Principles The following planning principles, developed through citizen participation efforts, form the basis for development of the Land Use Chapter. - Compact urban forms should be encouraged that create a greater sense of “community,” with pedestrian/bicycle-friendly settlement patterns. Neighborhood character should be preserved and protected. - Jobs, housing, services and other activities should be within easy walking distance and shorter commute times of each other. - The City of Liberty Lake should have a center focus that combines commercial, civic, cultural, and recreational uses. - Streets, pedestrian paths, and bike paths should contribute to a system of fully interconnected routes. - The City of Liberty Lake should have a diversity of housing and job types that enable residents from a wide range of economic levels and age groups to work and reside within the City's boundaries. B. History and Background The City of Liberty Lake contains a mix of land uses including single and multi-family dwellings, recreational areas including parks, trails, and golf courses, light manufacturing, and mostly regional scaled commercial, including two large grocery stores. Professional office buildings, restaurants, schools, and churches are also found with undeveloped land still available and suitable for residential, commercial, and industrial growth. At the initial startup of the City of Liberty Lake it was recommended to and approved by the City Council to adopt by reference the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan which pre-dated the Growth Management Act (GMA) and the Spokane County Zoning Code dated November 1998 to maintain the status quo until the City adopted its own Comprehensive Plan and Implementation Regulations. The  Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan Revised Land Use Chapter 5 PC Recommendation April 12, 2017 City has since adopted its own Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map and an Official Zoning Map. The Future Land Use Map features the following land use designations: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories 1. Residential Categories a. Single-Family - The Single-Family designation provides for single-family homes in support of established residential neighborhoods. This designation is the primary residential designation in the city. b. Mixed Residential - The Mixed Residential designation provides for a moderate increase in density using a variety of urban housing types and designs. This design oriented designation promotes residential renewal to small-lot single family homes, townhouses, duplexes, and small apartment buildings. The mix of housing may take a variety of forms, either mixed within a single site or mixed within a general area, with varied dwelling types. Developments within this designation should have a net density of no less than 6 units per acre. c. Multi-Family - The Multi-Family designation provides for a variety of medium to high density housing types and designs. The designation incorporates a combination of urban design elements to enhance the living environment while integrating the housing into a neighborhood or neighborhood business district. Urban design elements such as private and public open space, pedestrian orientation and connections, and security are integrated into the housing to create a high standard of community cohesion and character. Developments within this designation should have a net density of no less than 12 units per acre. 2. Mixed-use Area – Mixed-use areas are intended to enhance service options, encourage development of locally serving commercial uses, offices, light manufacturing, civic, recreational, and residential uses along transportation corridors identified on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 5.1. Mixed-use areas discourage low-intensity, auto-dependent uses and focus on a pedestrian orientation with an emphasis on aesthetics and design. Mixed-use Categories Mixed-use areas include “centers” and “corridors.” Urban centers and corridors provide focus points to the design of urban areas. Urban centers distributed spatially throughout the urban area provide for retail sales, services, government and business offices, recreation facilities, higher-density residences, and other high-intensity uses to serve the needs of surrounding residential areas. The Comprehensive Plan provides for three types of mixed-use centers, Neighborhood, Community, and Central Business District. The three types of centers are distinguished by scale and intensity. Neighborhood Centers are the smallest and least intensive, Community Centers are higher intensity, and the Central Business District, which is the largest and most intensely developed. The Central Business District provides for the widest range of uses. Mixed-use categories include the following:  Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan Revised Land Use Chapter 5 PC Recommendation April 12, 2017 a. Neighborhood Centers – Mixed-use centers for neighborhoods will ideally have identified neighborhood centers containing a civic green or park, a transit stop, neighborhood businesses and services, a day care center, and perhaps a church or school, and residential when associated with other permitted uses. b. Community Centers - Community centers are higher-intensity mixed-use areas designed to serve two or more neighborhoods. Community centers may have a mix of uses, including commercial, civic, light manufacturing or industrial, office, recreational uses, and residential when associated with the other permitted uses. c. Central Business District - The CBD is the primary retail, office, social, urban residential, and government center of the city (Map 5.2). The complementary and interactive mixture of uses and urban design provides for a regional intensity and viability with a local character. The regional focus and vitality of the district are evident in the urban intensity and composition of the uses in the district. Local character is reflected in the district’s design, people-orientation, and connectivity, which foster a sense of community. The CBD is intended to attract significant numbers of additional office and retail jobs as well as opportunities for new higher density housing. 3. Commercial Categories a. Freeway Commercial - The Freeway Commercial classification designates intensive commercial areas intended to draw customers from outlying areas. Interstate 90 is an aesthetic corridor and specific guidelines will be established to enhance the aesthetics of the Interstate 90 frontages. Shopping centers and major commercial areas of regional significance will be designated with this classification. Residential uses would typically not be allowed within the freeway commercial category, but transient housing (i.e. RV park and hotel/motel, intended for rental less than 30 days) may be permitted in mixed use, planned unit developments, south of I-90 and west of Madson Street, to support and complement the Central Business District and surrounding businesses. Light industrial areas may be allowed in this category. b. Community Commercial - The Community Commercial classification designates areas for retail, service, and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community business areas should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development. Community business centers may be designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan or Comprehensive Plan amendments. Residences in conjunction with business and/or multifamily developments may be allowed, with specific guidelines that ensure compatibility. c. Neighborhood Commercial - The Neighborhood Commercial classification designates areas for small-scale, neighborhood-serving retail and office uses. Neighborhood business areas should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development.  Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan Revised Land Use Chapter 5 PC Recommendation April 12, 2017 Neighborhood business centers may be designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan or Comprehensive Plan amendments 4. Industrial Category a. Light Industrial - The Light Industry category is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and internal and community compatibility. Light Industrial areas are comprised of predominantly industrial uses such as manufacturing and high technology-oriented businesses, but may incorporate office, and commercial, and mixed use planned unit developments uses that support and complement the industrial area. Multi-family housing and transient housing may be permitted in mixed use, planned unit developments, west of Madson Street, to support and complement the Central Business District and surrounding businesses. 5. Public and Semi-Public Institutional Uses. The Public and Semi-Public Institutional land use designation provides for large and moderate scale governmental uses, special districts, and semi-institutional uses. The designation allows for the specialized needs of providing public services to the City of Liberty Lake. 6. Open Space and Recreation. The Open Space and Recreation designation provides for open area spaces and recreational uses such as public/ private parks, preserves, and trails, as well as public and privately owned facilities such as golf courses. Local and regional recreation opportunities are included within this designation. The designation promotes the conservation of public and private sensitive or critical natural resource areas and areas of local interest as open space. 7. Aesthetic Corridors and Boulevards. Aesthetic corridors and boulevards are intended to protect the visual appeal of the area along major transportation routes entering, exiting, and circulating through the City of Liberty Lake  LL WINE CELLARS MCKINZIE BUSINESS PARK PROPOSED RV PARK INSIGHT TI TOWN STCU SQUARE TI Amanda Tainio From: Jason Fierst [gm.wa129@outlook.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 2:18 PM To: Katy Allen; Amanda Tainio Subject: Liberty Lake Center Owners Association Katy and Amanda, I wanted to keep you updated on the association’s progress now that we have had the opportunity to hold a special meeting of the owners we represent, after a long period of discussion last night and lots of questions that Lanzce fielded, it was brought to a vote by my board and the ownership voted, while not unanimously, but in majority to amend our CC&R’s to allow for Mulit‐family and RV Park development in the Industrial and commercial zones represented by the association. We appreciate your extension of time in order to have a public hearing on the 11th and at this point the Association official supports the voice of the owners in majority for you to move forward with the process of bringing the amendment initiative back before the council after the public hearing. Please let me know if you have any further questions. 1 ACTION ITEMS  AGENDA ITEM NO.: 9i BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, LIBERTY LAKE, WASHINGTON SUBJECT: Orchard Park Task Order for Pool FOR THE AGENDA OF: August 11, 2017 Concept Work DEPT. HEAD APPROVAL: DEPT. OF ORIGIN: Public Works EXHIBITS: SPVV Memo / Task Order EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Yes BUDGETED: Yes SUMMARY STATEMENT A possible pool site has been identified at new Orchard Park property. Staff is requesting that Council approve a task order to allow the Orchard Park Consultant to provide concepts and costs for the potential inclusion of a pool at the site. There are a number of ways to prepare for or include a pool on the site; the concept work of the Consultant would allow Council to see how a pool would be laid out and what the effects are on the park as a whole. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends: 1. Approve the task order for $7,500. MEMORANDUM 6/23/2017 To: Katie Allen, Andrew Staples From: Ken Van Voorhis Re: Orchard Park Comments: Dear Ms. Allen and Mr. Staples The Orchard park AE team led by SPVV Landscape Architects has prepared design fees as requested by the City Administration. As you know the project is currently on hold at the 90% status because of a change in direction. In meeting held on June 19, 2017 the City staff presented the Cities current thoughts a well as a change of scope that the city has requested our team to respond to. The following is a brief description of the changes that have been requested: The City has asked the team to consider fee and scoping impacts as follows: Option I Move the recreation courts to the south end of the site in the grassy open area and preserve the recreation court pad for a future simple rectangular pool tub. Included in this line of thinking would be to move the current Restroom/Storage building to the west side of the splash pad and add onto the structure a concessions extension. Under this option it is believed that regarding would be minimal, Utilities would be extended to the proposed location, landscape improvements would be adjusted including the picnic shelter relocation, and irrigation would be revised to address the changes. Option II Move the recreation courts to the south end of the site in the grassy open space, preserve the recreation court pad for a future simple rectangular pool tub. Included in this line of thinking would be to design a Restroom/Storage/pool mechanical/concession building at the west side of the splash pad. Under this option re-grading for a larger building would be required along with the possibility of an expanded parking lot along the north. Utilities would be sized for a pool facility and would be extended from the north side to the building location. Relocate the community garden, adjusts site elements including the picnic shelter, and irrigation would be revised to address the changes. 1908 W. Northwest Boulevard, Suite A |Spokane, WA 99205 | P: 509.325.0511 | F: 509.325.0557 | www.spvv.com Along with the two options we were requested to provide an update to the master plan illustration for the purpose of a public input meeting in early August. This public meeting will be used to inform the council of the proposed plan changes and determine the general public sentiment about the proposed direction. Once this is complete Council will give the team a direction to proceed. The thought is to have updated construction documents complete and ready to go to bid by November if possible or early January. The following is a brief schedule that we will update as information becomes available: June 23 Scope and fee to SPVV to forward to CLL July 12 Preliminary building programming discussion with CLL (SPVV/CAC) Aug 1 Master Plan option illustration final review by CLL (SPVV/CAC) Aug 7 Public Open House with Master Plan and Master Plan proposed changes Aug 8 Presentation to City Council about public opinion regarding MP changes Aug 9-Nov. 1 (Jan 5) Prepare CD’s for Bid release. The following fee schedule represents the A&E effort for the above referenced tasks. The initial update to the Orchard Park Master Plan (2016) includes a limited review of values associated with site construction impacts. Public meeting planning efforts and an initial program review with City staff, illustration updates representing the current 90% plan documents and an illustration representing the schematic programming that represents option II. This effort also includes a presentation at a public open house and one City Council meeting. Total A&E fee $7500 The following fee, (is an estimated range), of A&E service to integrate option I into the current 90% bid set. This integration effort will not be fully understood until after the Public and City Council meeting in August. Once this has been completed a more definitive fee will be presented for action and approval. Option I as described Additional A&E Fees $35,000-$43,000. Estimated overall construction cost $2.7+/-M The following fee, (is an estimated range), of A&E service to integrate option II into the current 90% bid set. This integration effort will not be fully understood until after the Public and City Council meeting in August. Once this has been completed a more definitive fee will be presented for action and approval. Option II as described A&E Fees $135,000 – $150,000. Estimated overall construction cost $3.8+/-M 1908 W. Northwest Boulevard, Suite A |Spokane, WA 99205 | P: 509.325.0511 | F: 509.325.0557 | www.spvv.com Exclusions: Information does not include Pool Consultant or Pool M.E.P.S. If these professional services are needed, fees will be negotiated at a later date. 1908 W. Northwest Boulevard, Suite A |Spokane, WA 99205 | P: 509.325.0511 | F: 509.325.0557 | www.spvv.com  SPVV Task Number 2017 - 001 The general provisions and clauses of Agreement Orchard Park shall be in full force and effect for this Task Assignment performed by SPVV. Location of Project: NORTH OF MISSION AND EAST OF GLENBROOK Project Title: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR ORCHARD PARK Maximum Amount Payable Per Task Assignment: $7,500 LUMP SUM Completion Date: NOVEMBER 1, 2017 Description of Work: (Note attachments and give brief description) A study to evaluate the potential change in scope that the city has requested. (See attachment) Agency Project Manager Signature: Date: Oral Authorization Date: See Letter Dated: Consultant Signature: Date: Agency Approving Authority: Date: DOT Form 140-089 EF Formal Task Assignment Revised 6/05 FIRST READ ORDINANCE  CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 242 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2016 - 2017 CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) was established in the State of Washington in 1990 to provide a framework for land use planning and development regulation; and WHEREAS, Spokane County and the cities within it were mandated to plan under the GMA in 1993; and WHEREAS, the City of Liberty Lake, located in Spokane County, Washington, is required to plan under the GMA, Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 36.70A, along with RCW 36.70B, RCW 43.21C, and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapters 365-196, 365-195, 197-11, and related Chapters; and WHEREAS, as a city within Spokane County, Liberty Lake crafted a Comprehensive Plan (updated in 2015) and Development Regulations (updated in 2017) which reflect and implement the community's vision for land use, consistent with the GMA; and WHEREAS, the 14 planning goals outlined in RCW 36.70A.020 and 480, guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations; and WHEREAS, the City utilized a public participation program for the 2016 - 2017 City Comprehensive Plan Amendments, which provided opportunities for early and continuous involvement by the public in the amendment process; and WHEREAS, the public participation program (consolidated with the 2016 - 2017 City Development Regulations Periodic Update) included a City Management Team Meeting, a Targeted Stakeholder Meeting, Joint City Council Planning Commission Meetings, multiple Planning Commission Meetings, a Notice of Availability and Non- Project SEPA Checklist with Threshold Determination Review, a Planning Commission Public Workshop, a Planning Commission Public Hearing, multiple City Council meetings, and a City Council Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, all public notification requirements were met and accomplished in a timely manner and advertised as needed to solicit broad public participation; and WHEREAS, a SEPA DNS Threshold Determination and Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was issued on the proposal with a fourteen (14) day public comment period; and 1  WHEREAS, the 2016 - 2017 City Comprehensive Plan Amendment process has been a "bottom up" effort, involving early and continuous public participation and the public had the opportunity to comment throughout the process; and WHEREAS, the GMA requires proposed comprehensive plans and development regulations, including proposed amendments, be forwarded to the WA State Department of Commerce Growth Management Services for review and comment sixty (60) days prior to the final City Council adoption, unless expedited review is requested and approved under RCW 36.70A.106 and the 2016 - 2017 City Development Regulations Periodic Updates and City Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s) have been forwarded with Material ID #23449 (March 8, 2017 - May 7, 2017 review period); and WHEREAS, all applicable state and local agencies also received a copy of the proposed amendments and were given the opportunity to comment; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to comment on the proposal were given a full and complete opportunity to be heard and comments were reviewed and considered; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan is the starting point for any planning process and the centerpiece of local planning. Development regulations implement the Comprehensive Plan and include a variety of land use regulations, such as zoning, subdivisions, critical areas, landscaping, planned unit development, signs, etc. and the City Development Code must be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, as well as being internally consistent. State agencies are required to comply with comprehensive plans and development regulations of jurisdictions planning under the GMA; and WHEREAS, the proposed 2016 - 2017 City Comprehensive Plan Amendment consists of the following: CPA2017-0001 Land Use Chapter 5 1. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories - Freeway Commercial and Light Industrial WHEREAS, the proposed amendment has met consistency review requirements and the criteria for amendment have been met; and WHEREAS, prior to adoption of the 2016 - 2017 City Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Recommendation; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Liberty Lake, Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. 2016 - 2017 City Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The final amended 2015 - 2037 City Comprehensive Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 2 Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance and the attachments hereto shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 3. Repealer. Any previous Ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance shall be repealed. Section 4. Administration and Enforcement. A. Administration. Planning & Building Services shall be responsible for the administration of this Ordinance. B. Enforcement. Projects that are subject to the provisions of this Ordinance and do not comply with the standards of this Ordinance shall be subject to the enforcement provisions of the Liberty Lake Municipal Code, City Development Code, and the River District SAP-08-0001, as applicable. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of July 2017. Mayor, Steve Peterson ATTEST: City Clerk, Ann Swenson Approved As To Form: City Attorney, Sean P. Boutz Date of Publication: Effective Date: 3 Introduction of Upcoming Agenda Items  DRAFT CITY COUNCIL ADVANCED AGENDAS For Planning Discussion Purposes Only As of July 7, 2017 Please note: This is a work in progress; items are tentative July 18, 2017 DUE Wed, July12 1. LOCAL BUSINESS SPOTLIGHT: Westmont Resources, Inc. – Peter Lindemann, Co-owner 2. PROMOTIONAL SWEARING IN CEREMONY: Jeff Jones, Liberty Lake Police Sergeant 3. City Council interviews / appointment/oath of office 4. PRESENTATIONS  Barefoot in the Park event update, Jennifer Camp  Liberty Lake Municipal Library 2nd Quarter Report, Pamela Mogen  Interlocal Agreement between City of Liberty Lake and Spokane County for Pavillion Park irrigation upgrades, Andrew Staples 5. Consent Agenda (minutes, vouchers) 6. RESOLUTIONS  Adopting the City’s Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program  Accepting the Wellington Street Improvement Dedication Agreement 7. SECOND READ ORDINANCE: Adopting the 2016 – 2017 City Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 1, 2017 DUE Wed, July26 1. LOCAL BUSINSS SPOTLIGHT: Origin Forensics LLC – Jarrod Carter, President / Erin Foss, COO 2. Consent Agenda (minutes, vouchers) 3. Approval of Interlocal Agreement Between City of Liberty Lake and Spokane County for Pavillion Park Irrigation Upgrades 4. PUBLIC HEARING: 2018 City of Liberty Lake Budget ************* TENTATIVE ITEMS: 1. Service contract with Ptera for phones and cameras 2. RESOLUTION – Update to the Financial Policy 3. PRESENTATION: Municipal City Flag (CC confirmation in June /July) 4. PRESENTATION: Orchard Park Update (mid August) 5. PRESENTATION: City of Liberty Lake Population Update (8/15) 6. Planning & Building Services Mid-Year 2017 Report (8/15) 7. Orchard Park land transfer 8. Legislation to establish a parks board 9. Award bid for construction of beacon install @ apts/HD (7/4 or alternate) 10. Ordinance 237 – Moratorium on the Acceptance of Applications and Issuance of Permits for Specific Types of Uses and Improvements in the I (Light Industrial) Zone; Providing Severability; and Declaring an Emergency (expires 8/21) 11. Award bid for signals @ Madson/Signal (potentially 10/17, pending successful funding) 12. Harvard Bridge Revision conceptual design presentation to Council (11/7) 13. Award bid for construction of Orchard Park (12/5) 14. Acknowledgement of Brian Cuda for his donation of time & expertise in helping the City to stream CC meetings. 15. Trutina 1st Addition Final Plat Resolution st nd 16. Planning Commission Re-Confirmations (recurring – 1 or 2 meeting every December)