City Planning Commission
Regular MeetingLiberty Lake, WA · October 13, 2021
Minutes
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
& PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 13TH, 2021
HELD REMOTELY
Planning Commission Members Present: Tim Olsen, Jamie Baird, Chris Cargill, Joe Mann, &
Stephen Ramirez
Adjunct Member(s) Present: Marilyn Van DeGrift, Conrad Band
Absent: Richard Siler, Marc Rubin
Staff Present: Lisa Key & Kelsey
Call to Order: Meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m.
Roll Call: A quorum of members was present. Commissioner Ramirez joined just after roll call,
and Commissioner Band joined at 4:16 p.m.
Review of Agenda & Approval of Minutes:
Commissioner Baird moved that the October 13th agenda be approved, seconded by
Commissioner Van Degrift. The motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Van Degrift moved that the September 8th minutes be approved, seconded by
Commissioner Baird. The motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearing:
Meadowwood Technology Campus Comp Plan Amendment & Zone Change
The public hearing commenced at 4:06 p.m. Lisa Key presented a brief staff report on the
proposed comprehensive plan amendments. She also gave a brief summary of written comments
received from the public and advised that the comments were provided to the commissioners in
their entirety. Questions asked and answered.
Michael Terrell and Kevin Schneidmiller, representing Greenstone, gave a brief presentation on
the proposed comprehensive plan amendments. Questions asked and answered.
Public testimony opened at 5:10 p.m.:
Greg Cronin: City resident, inquired whether low-income housing was allowed in this area. Lisa
Key responded that there are no restrictions on low-income housing.
Hayley Steward: City resident, inquired whether there would be any changes to current access
points. Greenstone responded stating that they don’t have any intentions of adding additional
entrance points at this time. Lisa Key added that a traffic analysis would be required at time of
each specific project application.
Tom Sahlberg: City resident, spoke in opposition of the amendment, stating he agreed with
Commissioner Siler’s view that Liberty Lake is not Kendall Yards, and he believes that this change
is to benefit the developer and not to Liberty Lake.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1|3
October 13, 2021
Ron Gray: Non city resident, inquired whether this change would take away opportunities for light
industrial.
Rich Maes: City resident, asked if the allowed uses in the M2 zone are published somewhere.
Lisa Key advised it is within the development code published on the City’s website.
With there being no further comment, public testimony closed at 5:22 p.m. and deliberations
ensued.
While the Development Code is not explicit regarding criteria for approval of a Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map Amendment, the following are criteria were considered by the Planning
Commission in their deliberations:
• Is the proposed amendment consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals & Policies?
Several Commissioners felt that the proposed amendment was consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan regarding diversity of housing, mixed use, and economic
development policies.
• Has a change in economic, technological, or land use conditions occurred to warrant the
proposed amendment?
Commissioners acknowledged that Covid-19 has resulted in changes to the workforce
and the economy with a potential impact on call centers and similar types of industries as
a result of more remote work opportunities and less investment in brick and mortar offices.
• Will the proposed amendment be compatible with adjacent land uses, or are there
mitigations that will make the proposed amendments compatible with the surrounding land
uses?
Commissioners had a divergence of opinion regarding compatibility with surrounding land
uses. Several thought townhomes to be very compatible with the character of the nearby
Rocky Hill and Stone Hill neighborhoods, and that it provides an opportunity for affordable,
workforce housing. Others indicated a concern regarding compatibility, with the property
surrounded on nearly all sides by Light Industrial-zoned properties.
• Will the proposed amendment negatively impact transportation facilities? If so, can those
impacts be mitigated?
Commissioners generally agreed that, based upon the Trip Generation Letter submitted
into the record, the proposal would not result in negative impacts to traffic.
• Is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public good?
Some Commissioners indicated that a diversity of housing types and range of affordability
was in the public interest, though others questioned whether it was appropriate in this
location.
• Is the proposed amendment in the public interest?
Several Commissioners agreed that various types of housing and additional, small
neighborhood-centric commercial uses were in the public interest, others expressed
concerns regarding housing in this location, and lack of specific information regarding the
actual uses to be developed there.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2|3
October 13, 2021
Based upon the proposed amendments consistency with Comprehensive Plan Policies, the
change in economic conditions warranting the amendment, and the public interest served by
increasing the diversity of housing options in the City, Commissioner Olsen moved to approve an
amendment to the City of Liberty Lake 2015 – 2037 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, to
change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation of the subject property from Light
Industrial to Community Center – Mixed Use. Commissioner Cargill seconded the motion. A roll
call vote followed. Commissioners Mann, Olsen, Cargill and Band voted in favor; Commissioners
Baird, Ramirez and Van Degrift voted in opposition. The motion carried with a final tally of 4-3.
The Hearing closed at 6:01 p.m. Lisa Key, Director of Planning & Engineering reviewed next
steps in the process.
Secretary’s Report:
No reports were made at this time.
Planning Commissioner Reports:
Commissioner Cargill encouraged everyone to vote.
Commissioner Ramirez volunteered to report at the October 19th City Council Meeting.
Citizens Comments:
No citizens comments were made at this time.
Adjournment:
Commissioner Baird moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Ramirez which
carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 6:04 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3|3
October 13, 2021
Agenda
PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2021
4 P.M.
CITY HALL
HELD REMOTELY
PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR INSLEE’S ORDER 20-28 DATED MARCH 24, 2020 – ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS
WILL BE HELD REMOTELY.
The Planning Commission will participate via ZOOM. The public can participate via the following:
• Sign up to provide Public Comment at the meeting via calling in
• Submit Written Public Comment Prior to 2 pm on October 13, 2021
• Join the Zoom Meeting
Questions or Need Assistance? Please contact Planning Commission Clerk Megan Abhold at
mabhold@libertylakewa.gov
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. GENERAL BUSINESS:
• Review of Agenda
• Approval of Minutes from September 8, 2021
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
• Meadowwood Technology Campus Comp Plan Amendment & Zone Change
5. REPORTS:
• Secretary’s Report
• Planning Commissioner Reports
6. Citizens Comments
7. Adjournment
Next Meeting: November 10, 2021
PUBLIC COMMENT
If you wish to provide oral public comments or testimony during the Planning Commission
meeting, please register through this link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87659614905
WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS
If you wish to provide written public comments for the upcoming council meeting, please email
your comments to mabhold@libertylakewa.gov by 2:00 p.m. the day of the Planning
Commission meeting and include all of the following information with your comments:
1. The Meeting Date
2. Your First and Last Name
3. If you are a Liberty Lake resident
4. The Agenda Item(s) which you are speaking about
JOIN ZOOM MEETING
To view the meeting live via Zoom Meeting, join the Zoom web meeting:
Meeting Instructions:
To join the Zoom web meeting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87659614905
Meeting ID: 876 5961 4905
Passcode: 746108
Dial In Phone Numbers:
• +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
• +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8TH, 2021
HELD REMOTELY
Planning Commission Members Present: Tim Olsen, Jamie Baird, Chris Cargill, Joe Mann, &
Stephen Ramirez
Adjunct Member(s) Present: Marilyn Van DeGrift, Conrad Band
Absent: Richard Siler
Staff Present: Lisa Key & Megan Abhold
Call to Order: Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m.
Roll Call: A quorum of members was present.
Review of Agenda & Approval of Minutes:
Commissioner Baird moved that the September 8th agenda be approved, seconded by
Commissioner Olsen. The motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Ramirez moved that the August 11th minutes be approved, seconded by
Commissioner Baird. The motion carried unanimously.
Ratifications of Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations in the Matter of Amendments
to Development Regulations regarding Emergency Shelters, Transitional & Supportive
Housing:
Prior to ratification, discussion was had regarding the difference between beds, vs. units, the
use of the term “voluntary”, and clarification of distance requirements.
Commissioner Cargill noted his disagreement for the amendments and noted that his approval
vote is due to the requirement from the State to provide the amendments.
A roll call vote followed, which concluded to approve the Findings, Conclusions &
Recommendations with a final tally of 5-2. Commissioners Mann and Van DeGrift voted nay.
Workshop:
Meadowwood Technology Campus Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Zone Change:
Director Lisa Key presented on Greenstone’s proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan and
apply for a Zone Change for the Meadowwood Technology Campus. Director Key also
discussed the Trip Generation and Distribution Letter that was provided as well as the timeline
for approval for the MTC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Zone Change.
Kevin Schneidmiller and Michael Terrell detailed the goal of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment & Zone Change and provided reasoning behind the requests from employers to
see amenities, retail opportunities and residential buildings nearby.
Questions were asked and answered.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1|2
September 8, 2021
Secretary’s Report:
Lisa Key reported on the below listed items:
• Open City Engineer position
• Zoning & Housing Amendments
• Planning Commission Workshop in November on Code Amendment to allow mini
storage or RV use.
• Public Hearing at the October 13th Planning Commission Meeting
Planning Commissioner Reports:
No Planning Commission reports were made at this time.
Citizens Comments:
No citizens comments were made at this time.
Adjournment:
Commissioner Baird moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Cargill which
carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2|2
September 8, 2021
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. LUA2021-0006, A REQUEST BY GREENSTONE CORPORATION TO
AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION FOR
MEADOWWOOD TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS FROM I (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO M-2 (COMMUNITY
CENTER MIXED USE)
PLANNING COMMISION HEARING DATE: October 13 @ 4:00 p.m.
PROPOSAL COORDINATOR: Lisa D. Key, Director of Planning, Engineering & Building
Services
PROPOSAL SUMMARY:
LUA2021-0006 -Meadowwood Technology Campus (MTC) Comprehensive
Project Name & File No.
Plan Land Use Map Amendment & Zone Change
Meadowwood Technology Campus, located on the NE Corner of E Mission
Ave and N Molter Rd.
Location
A portion of the SW 1/2 of SW ¼ of Section 11, Township 25, Range 45
EWM
The applicant is requesting a change in the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Proposal Description and Zoning Designation for the subject property (MTC) from I (Light
Industrial) to M-2 (Community Center Mixed Use) on 69.37 acres
Tax Parcel Numbers 55113.0220; 55113.0221; 55113.0222; 55113.0223; 55113.0224;
55113.0225; 55113.0226; 55113.0227; and 55113.0228.
Applicant/ Contact Greenstone/Kevin Schneidmiller
Proposed Amendment:
City of Liberty Lake 2015 – 2037 Comprehensive Plan / Chapter 5, Land
Comprehensive Plan /
Use/ Map 5.1 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
Chapter / Section
Proposed Amendment:
City Development Code City Development Code §10-2A-5, Zoning District Map Exhibit
Section
Proposed Amendment See Exhibit A, Comprehensive Plan Land Use & Zoning Map Proposed
Exhibit Amendments.
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 1
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
Partially developed Office Park on 69.37 acres, with approximately 17.9
Existing Land Use
acres remaining undeveloped.
North: I (Light Industrial) / Huntwood Manufacturing.
East: I (Light Industrial) / Vacant.
Surrounding Zoning/
South: O (Open Space) & R-1 (Single-Family Residential / HOA-owned
Land Use
open space/buffer & residential
West: C1 (Community Commercial) & I (Light Industrial) / Mixed
commercial offices & light industrial uses
Transportation The subject property fronts on N Molter Rd to the west, and E Mission to
Network the south, both of which are classified as arterials.
Five transit stops are located within and on the perimeter of the office
Transit Service
park.
Amphitheater and picnic pavilion located on-site; Rocky Hill Community
Nearest Park
Park is located approximately 0.43 miles from the campus.
Water & Sewer
Liberty Lake Sewer & Water District
Purveyor
School District Central Valley School District
APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The application was submitted on March 30, 2021. The application was deemed complete on December
8, 2020. A corrected and revised preliminary plat, based on staff and agency comments, was submitted
on January 13, 2021. The original application, and related materials are appended to this report as Exhibit
B.
STATE OF WASHINGTON REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, AUTHORITY & REQUIREMENTS:
RCW 36.70A: Growth Management Act (GMA):
Liberty Lake is mandated to plan under GMA. The City’s Comprehensive Plan and Development
Regulations were developed in accordance with the requirements of GMA. Development
Regulations are required to implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and any amendments to
City Development Code must be consistent with the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. The City
must provide reasonable public notice of proposed amendments and opportunities for public
participation.
WAC 365-196: Growth Management -- Procedural Criteria for Adopting Comprehensive
Plans and Development Regulations
Development code amendments must comply with procedures established in WAC 365-196,
including rules regarding internal consistency, interjurisdictional coordination, public participation
requirements, and notification to the Department of Commerce of “intent to adopt” proposed
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 2
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
code amendments at least 60 days prior to final adoption.
WAC 197-11: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules:
Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations are subject to SEPA review as a non-project
action, in accordance with procedures established in WAC 197-11.
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK & PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS:
City Code §10-2J: I (Light Industrial) Zoning District Regulations
This chapter details development standards, required setbacks, building heights, architectural
design standards, and performance standards for limited and conditional uses within the light
industrial zone. Outright allowed uses in this zoning district include manufacturing, warehousing
and distribution, and offices. Limited uses permitted in this zone include retail, restaurants, and
similar commercial uses.
City Code §10-2F: M-2 (Community Center – Mixed Use) Zoning District Regulations
This chapter details development standards, required setbacks, building heights, architectural
design standards, and performance standards for limited and conditional uses within the
community center-mixed use zone. Outright allowed uses in this zoning district include offices,
commercial, and retail uses. Limited uses permitted in this zone include light manufacturing,
multi-family dwellings, single-family attached town homes, and single-family courtyard homes.
City Code §10-4B-5(C): Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning Map:
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments and district or City-wide Zoning Map
Amendments are Type IV Projects. Property rezones for individual properties are Type II Project
Permits. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map must be consistent and
applications for property rezones must also include a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
amendment request. The Planning Commission holds a public hearing and provides a
recommendation regarding the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments, and provides
comments regarding the rezone, which will be incorporated into the staff report prepared for
the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will conduct a public hearing regarding the
property rezone request. The Hearing Examiner's recommendation will be forwarded to the City
Council, and a public hearing before City Council will be held regarding the Comprehensive Plan
amendment and zoning amendment. City Council will adopt its own findings of fact and
statement setting forth the factors considered at the hearing and the property rezones
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, as well as its own analysis of findings
considered by the Council. The Council, after the public hearing, may adopt the property rezone,
make minor changes, or deny it. If approved, the property rezone becomes effective five (5) days
after the publication of the adopting ordinance in the official City newspaper and a Notice of
Decision shall be provided for the property rezone.
City Code §10-4J: Zoning District Map & Text Amendments:
City Code §10-4J-3 identifies property re-zones as quasi-judicial. Quasi-judicial amendments
require a hearing before the Hearing Examiner, whose decision is a recommendation to City
Council. If a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment is required, the Planning
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 3
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
Commission holds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to City Council regarding the
Comprehensive Plan map amendment, which is a Type IV process required to be reviewed during
the annual amendment process. It also states that property rezones and Comprehensive Plan
Amendments should be conducted concurrently.
City Code §10-4J-4 indicates a quasi-judicial decision may be denial, approval, or approval with
conditions.
City Code §10-4J-6 requires that Comprehensive Plan amendments and zoning district changes
be evaluated to determine if the proposed change would significantly affect transportation
facilities.
SEPA REVIEW:
On August 31, 2021, the City of Liberty Lake issued a Notice of Availability and disseminated the SEPA
checklist for review and comment, along with a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) and Adoption of
Existing Environmental Document under the provisions of WAC 197-11-340(2), which allowed for a 14-
day agency comment period ending on September 14, 2021, before it took effect. The deadline for SEPA
procedural appeals and appeals of the threshold determination was September 28, 2021. No appeal of
the SEPA procedure or threshold determination has been filed.
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION:
Application Received: March 30, 2021
Planning Commission Workshops LUA2021-0006: April 14, 2021
June 9, 2021
September 9. 2021
Agency & Web Notice of Availability/Hearings: August 31, 2021
Mailings to 400’ Radius: September 1, 2021
Newspaper Publication - Notice of Availability/Hearings: September 3, 2021
Posting of Public Notice on Site: September 3, 2021
End of SEPA Comment Period: September 14, 2021
End of SEPA Appeal Period: September 28, 2021
Department of Commerce 60 Day Notice: October 5, 2021
Planning Commission Hearing: October 13, 2021
Hearing Examiner Hearing: October 26, 2021
City Council Hearing: November 16, 2021 (tent)
The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation is the subject of the Planning
Commission hearing scheduled for October 13, 2021. The proposed zone change will be the subject of
the Hearing Examiner hearing scheduled for Oct 26, 2021. Both the Planning Commission and Hearing
Examiner make recommendations to the City Council, who will hold a public hearing tentatively scheduled
for November 16, 2021. The City Council decision is final, subject to appeals by the applicant or persons
having standing, as defined in RCW36.70C to Spokane County Superior Court filed within 21 calendar days
of the date of the written decision. Additionally, appeal of matters subject to board review, as outlined
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 4
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
in RCW 36.70A.280 shall be made by a petition to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings
Board as outlined in RCW 36.70A.290, or review may be directed to the Superior Court as outlined in RCW
36.70A.295. SEPA documents and procedural notices are appended to this document as Exhibit C.
AGENCY REVIEW:
SEPA Distribution List & Adjacent Jurisdictions during Annexation Proceedings: Liberty Lake Police
Department; Avista; Century Link; Central Valley School District; City of Spokane Valley; CDA Tribe;
Comcast; Spokane Clean Air; Spokane Valley Fire District; Spokane Transit Authority; Spokane Regional
Health District; Spokane Tribe; WS Department of Ecology; WS Department of Fish & Wildlife; WS
Department of Natural Resources; WS Department of Transportation; Spokane Regional Transportation
Council; Spokane Transit; Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District; Consolidated Irrigation District; Spokane
County Utilities; Spokane County Planning; WS Department of Commerce.
Only two comments were received from agencies. Spokane Tribe Historic Preservation Office commented
that a case-by-case review will be required for all future project actions on the site. Spokane Transit
commented that the site is served by five bus stops, and asked that any changes to stops or sidewalks in
the vicinity of the project be coordinated with STA. Agency comments are appended to this report as
Exhibit D.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
As of the time of this writing, only one public comment has been received regarding the requested
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the subject property.
Those comments were in opposition to the zone change due to concerns regarding traffic, and a desire
not to see multi-family residential in the vicinity of a “single-family zoned neighborhood”. Public
comments are appended to this document as Exhibit E.
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY:
While Transportation Concurrency is generally not required for a non-project action, City Code §10-4J-6A
requires that zone changes be reviewed to determine whether the proposed amendment will result in a
significant impact to transportation facilities.
At the request of staff, the applicant provided a Trip Generation and Distribution Letter prepared by
Whipple Consulting Engineers to assess the potential transportation impact of the potential change of use
on the 17.9 acres of potentially developable land within the subject property. For the purpose of this
analysis, it was determined that the maximum number of residential units that could be developed on the
nearly 18 acres is 250 units if the zoning is changed to M-2, while taking into consideration parking,
required open space, and density requirements in the M-2 zone. The trip generation for 250 new
residential units was compared to the trip generation from the full build-out of the remaining acreage as
250,000 office space if the zoning was not changed. The result was of the analysis indicated that 250 new
dwelling units in lieu of 250,000 sq. ft. of office space would result in a net reduction in PM peak hour
trips. On this basis, it was determined that the requested change in the land use designation and zoning
would minimize traffic impacts that would otherwise be generated by MTC at build-out under its current
land use and zoning designation.
The Trip Generation and Distribution Letter prepared by Whipple Consulting Engineers is appended to
this report as Exhibit F.
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 5
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS:
Light Industrial: The Light Industry category is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis
and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and internal and community compatibility. Light Industrial
areas are comprised of predominantly industrial uses such as manufacturing but may incorporate office
and commercial uses that support and complement the industrial area.
Community Center-Mixed Use: Community centers are higher-intensity mixed-use areas designed to
serve two or more neighborhoods. Community centers may have a mix of uses, including commercial,
civic, light manufacturing or industrial, office, recreational uses, and residential when associated with
the other permitted uses.
RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS & POLICIES:
Governance Goal 1: Actively involve residents, businesses, and property owners in the governance of the
City.
Land Use Goal 1: Provide a healthful, safe, and sustainable urban environment.
Housing Goal 1: Preserve the character of existing neighborhoods and support high quality new
development.
Housing Goal 2: Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments, promote a
variety of densities and housing types, and encourage the preservation of existing housing stock.
Economic Development Goal 1: Maintain a healthy and sustainable local economy.
Governance Policy 1: The City shall use the website, email, social media, newsletters, local newspapers,
special announcements and other techniques to keep the community well-informed.
Land Use Policy 2: Provide for a compatible mix of housing and commercial uses in all commercial districts,
neighborhood centers, community centers, and the Central Business District.
Urban Design Policy 19: Maintain design standards and land use plans for neighborhood centers,
community centers, and the Central Business District that are based on the following principles:
a. Centers should be compact, nonlinear development to encourage transit, bicycle, and pedestrian
travel. Multistory construction, structured parking, and other techniques to use land efficiently
should be encouraged.
b. Aesthetic quality and compatibility among land uses within and adjacent to centers should be
enhanced through landscaping, building orientation and setbacks, traffic control, and other
measures to reduce potential conflicts. Distinctive or historical local character and natural features
should be reflected in development design to provide variety within centers.
c. Unsightly views, such as heavy machinery, storage areas, loading docks, and parking areas, should
be screened from the view of adjacent uses and from arterials.
d. Signs should be regulated to reduce glare and other adverse visual impacts on nearby residents
without limiting their potential contribution to the color and character of the center.
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 6
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
e. Routes for pedestrian, auto, bicycle, transit, and truck travel within centers should have convenient
access to each major destination. Buildings should be close to sidewalks to promote walking and
browsing, with parking areas located on the side or rear of buildings or adjacent to the street causing
the appearance of on-street angle or parallel parking.
f. Commercial development in centers should provide or contribute to public spaces such as plazas,
parks, and building atriums to enhance the appearance of the center and to provide amenities for
employees and shoppers.
g. Off-street parking areas should be designed to enhance pedestrian and handicapped access to
commercial uses.
h. To encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation require the installation of secure
bicycle parking facilitates that are convenient for users and safe for pedestrians.
i. Facilitate the safe use of golf carts where appropriate.
Housing Policy 2: Periodically assess the effects of policies and regulations on the affordability of housing,
fair housing choice, and examine the need to reduce regulatory barriers.
Housing Policy 8: To support mobility for those with special needs, locate housing in areas accessible to
public transportation.
Economic Development Policy 4: Continue to support the start-up, retention, expansion, and recruitment
of businesses.
Economic Development Policy 5: Provide consistent, fair, and timely regulations that are flexible,
responsive, and effective.
Economic Development Policy 6: Periodically review and update economic development techniques to
provide a business climate conducive to new and start-up businesses.
Economic Development Policy 8: Encourage development of contingency plans for the possible loss of
any of the employers in the City that have a significant economic impact on the City.
Economic Development Policy 14: Maintain an inventory of usable industrial and commercial land that is
sufficient to meet projected demand and encourage marketability of the City.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Meadowwood Technology Campus is an area encompassing nearly 70 acres, developed in the mid-1990’s
as corporate offices for Hewlett Packard. The site consists of 4 office buildings totaling 450,000 sq. ft. of
office space, including an on-site dining area, meeting space, and parking, along with an outdoor
amphitheater and picnic pavilion. Approximately 14 acres of the property are currently undeveloped.
The site is bordered to the west by N Molter Road, and to the south by east Mission Avenue, both classified
as arterials. The site is currently served by a total of 5 transit stops.
Currently, several of the larger tenants within the campus are call centers, and with changes in work
patterns, those tenants are not expected to renew their lease. In an effort to remain relevant to a 21st
century workforce, the applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Land Use amendment and zone
change to allow for a mixed use campus that would allow for some in-fill housing, as well as amenities
such as sandwich and coffee shops, and small, neighborhood-oriented commercial.
The proposed land use/zoning category is less intensive than the current designation and appears to be
compatible with surrounding uses. If residential uses are proposed along northern or eastern areas of the
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 7
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
site, the City’s landscaping standards do require a 10 ft. landscape buffer with evergreens trees and a solid
6 ft fence or wall against the Light Industrial properties located to the north and east.
The proposed amendment appears to be generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan goals and policies,
particularly in the areas of:
• Promoting a variety of housing types and densities, as well as a mix of housing and commercial
uses;
• The general intent of community centers, as detailed in Urban Design Policy 19;
• Housing policies related to accessibility to transit; and,
• Economic development policies regarding:
o Responsiveness to the business climate and new economic development techniques;
o Contingency plans for the possible loss of employers; and,
o Maintaining marketable inventory of commercial and industrial properties.
Procedural requirements and policies regarding public engagement have been met.
FINDINGS:
1. The required SEPA review has been completed on the proposed amendment.
2. All public and agency notice requirements were met and accomplished in a timely manner, and
the Notice of Application & Hearing was properly posted on the site.
3. The public was provided the opportunity for early and continuous participation.
4. The public had the opportunity to submit written comments and testify at a public hearing before
the Planning Commission.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL:
While the Development Code is not explicit regarding criteria for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map Amendment, the following are criteria the Planning Commission may wish to consider in their
deliberations:
• Is the proposed amendment consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals & Policies?
• Has a change in economic, technological, or land use conditions occurred to warrant the proposed
amendment?
• Will the proposed amendment be compatible with adjacent land uses, or are there mitigations
that will make the proposed amendments compatible with the surrounding land uses?
• Will the proposed amendment negatively impact transportation facilities? If so, can those impacts
be mitigated?
• Is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public good?
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 8
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
• Is the proposed amendment in the public interest?
CONCLUSIONS:
To be identified by the Planning Commission in their deliberations.
NOTE: The Planning Commission should consider the above-listed questions in their deliberations and/or
identify other factors upon which their recommendation is based.
RECOMMENDATION:
In the matter of Case No. LUA2021-0006, an amendment to the City of Liberty Lake 2015 – 2037
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation of the
subject property from Light Industrial to Community Center – Mixed Use, the City of Liberty Lake Planning
Commission does hereby recommend to the Hearing Examiner and City Council that the amendment be
APPROVED/APPROVED WITH CONDITONS/NOT APPROVED.
NOTE: The Planning Commission should vote on a motion for recommendation using the above format. If
the recommendation is to approve with modifications, the motion should identify the modifications
proposed.
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A - Proposed Map Amendments
Exhibit B – Application Materials
Exhibit C – SEPA Documents & Procedural Notices
Exhibit D – Agency Comments
Exhibit E – Public Comments
Exhibit F – Trip Generation & Distribution
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 9
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
EXHIBIT A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 10
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
Proposed Amendment to M2
Staff Report to the Planning Commission 11
2021 Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendment LUA2021-0006
Exhibit B - Application Materials
Exhibit C - SEPA Documents & Procedural Notices
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF SEPA CHECKLIST & NOTICE OF PLANNING
COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
AND ZONE CHANGE FOR MEADOWWOOD TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS
In accordance with WAC 197-11, notice is hereby given that a SEPA Checklist has been
completed on the Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for
Meadowwood Technology Campus, from I (Light Industrial) to M-2 (Community Center Mixed
Use), to allow for the balance of the campus to be developed as a mixture of office, retail, and
residential uses. The City of Liberty Lake Planning, Engineering & Building Services has determined
that the proposal will have no significant adverse environmental impacts and has issued a
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). Copies of the SEPA Checklist and the DNS Threshold
Determination will be available for review on or before Tuesday, August 31, 2021. Comments
on the SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination should be sent to the contact person listed
below, no later than 4 p.m., on Tuesday, September 14, 2021. An appeal of the Threshold
Determination, after it becomes final, may be made to the City of Liberty Lake Planning,
Engineering & Building Services at 22710 E. Country Vista, Liberty Lake, WA 99019. The appeal
deadline to request an 'open record' appeal to the Hearing Examiner is fourteen (14) calendar
days after the threshold determination is issued. A notice of appeal must be delivered to the City
by mail or personal delivery by 4 p.m. on September 28, 2021. Appeal requests shall contain all
information and items required in the City Development Code Section 10-4B-4, subsection H and
shall follow the procedures outlined in City Development Code Section 10-6A-7, Subsection C for
SEPA Appeals and Section 10-4G-2, subsection H for Appeals of Administrative Interpretations by
the Director.
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING: Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Planning Commission of the City of Liberty Lake will conduct a virtual public hearing on the
proposed Meadowwood Technology Campus Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change.
Attendees will have the opportunity to testify on the above-mentioned proposed amendments.
Written comments may also be submitted to the contact person below. The Planning
Commission’s public hearing will be held virtually on Wednesday, October 13, 2021 beginning
at 4pm. Login Info for the Virtual Hearing is as follows:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87659614905
Meeting ID: 876 5961 4905
Phone In: 253- 215 -8782
HEARING EXAMINER HEARING: Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that a second
virtual hearing before the Hearing Examiner will be conducted on the Meadowwood Technology
Campus Zone Change. Attendees will have the opportunity to testify on the above-mentioned
proposed amendments. Written comments may also be submitted to the contact person below.
The Planning Commission’s public hearing will be held virtually on Tuesday, October 26, 2021
beginning at 9am. Login Info for the Virtual Hearing is as follows:
https://spokanecity.webex.com/spokanecity/j.php?MTID=m528ad63eab668667bcea5f3fdd565e
b1
Meeting No: 146 338 6061
Meeting Password: PqPjyfWT577
Phone In: 408-418-9388
A City Staff Report presentation will be presented at each hearing and copies will be available on
the City website listed below at least 10 days prior to the public hearing.
For more information or to receive copies of the DNS, SEPA Checklist, Threshold Determination,
or the proposed amendments, please contact: Lisa D. Key, Director of Planning, Engineering &
Building Services, 22710 E. Country Vista Drive, Liberty Lake, WA 99019. Phone: 509-755-6708,
Fax: 509-755-6713, Email: lkey@libertylakewa.gov. Information is also available on the City
website at http://www.libertylakewa.gov/196/Public-Notices. Individuals planning to attend the
hearing who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments,
please contact the City Clerk at (509) 755-6729 within at least 48 hours of the meeting so that
arrangements may be made.
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) &
ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
LUA2021-0011: Meadowwood Technology Campus Comprehensive Plan
Proposal Description:
Amendment & Zone Change – I to M2
NE Corner of E Mission Ave and N Molter Rd; SW ¼ of SW ¼ of Section 11,
Location of Current Proposal:
Township 25, Range 45 EWM
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Spokane County
Title of Document
Being Adopted:
Comprehensive Plan & Final Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Liberty
Lake Urban Growth Area Boundary Alternatives
Date Adopted Document was Prepared: November 22, 2000 & December 13, 2006
Description of Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Spokane County
document (or portion) Comprehensive Plan & Final Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Liberty
being adopted: Lake Urban Growth Area Boundary Alternatives
If the document being adopted has been
challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe:
No challenges known
The document is available to be read at
(place/time):
Liberty Lake City Hall, Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm
Comment Deadline: 4 p.m., September 14, 2021
We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review. The
document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decision
maker.
Name of agency adopting document: City of Liberty Lake
LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE
The lead agency for the proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The SEPA
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) Threshold Determination was made after review of completed environmental
checklists and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The
complete record in this matter is on file during the appeal period with the review authority listed below and is available to
the public upon request.
□ This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further
comment period on the DNS.
■ This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2): the lead agency will not act on the proposal for 14 days
from the date below. Comments must be received by: 4 p.m., September 14, 2021.
An appeal of the Threshold Determination, after it becomes final, may be made to the City of Liberty Lake Planning,
Engineering & Building Services at 22710 E. Country Vista, Liberty Lake, WA 99019. The appeal deadline to request an
'open record' appeal to the Hearing Examiner is fourteen (14) calendar days after the comment period closes. A notice of
appeal must be delivered to the City by mail or personal delivery and the appeal must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the last
day of the appeal period (August 5, 2019). Appeal requests shall contain all information and items required in the City
Development Code Section 10-4B-4, subsection H, as applicable and shall follow the procedures outlined in City
Development Code Section 10-6A-7, Subsection C for SEPA Appeals and Section 10-4G-2, subsection H for Appeals of
Administrative Interpretations by the Director.
A copy of this SEPA determination has been provided to the Dept. of Ecology - Olympia, Dept. of Transportation - Spokane
County, and Other Reviewing Agencies.
A Notice of SEPA Availability will also be printed in the September 3, 2021 edition of the Spokane Valley News Herald.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Lisa D. Key TITLE: Director of Planning, Engineering & Building Services
Planning, Engineering & Building Services
22710 E. Country Vista, Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Phone: (509) 755-6708, Fax: (509) 755-6713, www.libertylakewa.gov
Date Issued: August 31, 2021
Signature: __________________
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(Do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware
of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,
would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were
not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of
noise?
No adverse impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Meadowwood
Technology Campus Zone Change.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
All future project proposals will be subject to applicable environmental and land use
regulations.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish or marine life?
No adverse impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed zoning amendments .
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish or marine life are:
All future project proposals will be subject to applicable environmental and land use
regulations.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
No adverse impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed zoning amendment.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
All future project proposals will be subject to applicable environmental and land use
regulations.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as
parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat,
historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains or prime farmlands?
No adverse impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed zoning amendment.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
All future project proposals will be subject to applicable regulations relating to
environmentally sensitive areas and areas designated, eligible, or under study for
governmental protection.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether
it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
No adverse impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed zoning amendment.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
N/A. No shoreline s in the vicinity of the proposed zone change..
5/1/09 SEPA Checklist Part D Page 1
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
No impact to transportation or public services and utilities is anticipated to arise from
the proposed zone change.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Not applicable, as no impact is anticipated.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state or federal laws
or requirements for the protection of the environment.
No conflicts are anticipated.
For More Information Please Contact the
City of Liberty Lake Planning & Building Services
22710 E. Country Vista Drive
Liberty Lake , WA 99019
Phone: 509-755-6707, Fax: 509-755-6713
www.libertylakewa.gov
5/1/09 SEPA Checklist Part D Page 2
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE NOTICE OF
AVAILABILITY OF SEPA CHECKLIST &
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDEMNT
AND ZONE CHANGE FOR
MEADOWWOOD
TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS
In accordance with WAC 197-11, notice
is hereby given that a SEPA Checklist
has been completed on the Proposed
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Zone Change for Meadowwood Tech-
nology Campus, from I (Light Indus-
trial) to M-2 (Community Center Mixed
Use), to allow for the balance of the cam-
pus to be developed as a mixture of of-
fice, retail, and residential uses. The City
of Liberty Lake Planning, Engineering &
Building Services has determined that the
proposal will have no significant adverse
environmental impacts and has issued a
Determination of Non-Significance (DNS).
Copies of the SEPA Checklist and the
DNS Threshold Determination will be
available for review on or before Tues-
day, August 31, 2021. Comments on the
SEPA Checklist and Threshold Deter-
mination should be sent to the contact
person listed below, no later than 4
p.m., on Tuesday, September 14, 2021.
An appeal of the Threshold Determination,
after it becomes final, may be made to the
City of Liberty Lake Planning, Engineering
& Building Services at 22710 E. Country
Vista, Liberty Lake, WA 99019. The appeal
deadline to request an 'open record' ap-
peal to the Hearing Examiner is fourteen
(14) calendar days after the threshold de-
termination is issued. A notice of appeal
must be delivered to the City by mail or
personal delivery by 4 p.m. on September
28, 2021. Appeal requests shall contain all
information and items required in the City
Development Code Section 10-4B-4, sub-
section H and shall follow the procedures
outlined in City Development Code Section
10-6A-7, Subsection C for SEPA Appeals
and Section 10-4G-2, subsection H for Ap-
peals of Administrative Interpretations by
the Director.
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING:
Notice is hereby given to all interested
persons that the Planning Commission
of the City of Liberty Lake will conduct a
virtual public hearing on the proposed
Meadowwood Technology Campus Com-
prehensive Plan Amendment and Zone
Change. Attendees will have the oppor-
tunity to testify on the above-mentioned
proposed amendments. Written comments
may also be submitted to the contact per-
son below. The Planning Commission’s
public hearing will be held virtually on
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 begin-
ning at 4pm. Login Info for the Virtual
Hearing is as follows:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87659614905
Meeting ID: 876 5961 4905
Phone In: 253- 215 -8782
A City Staff Report presentation will be
conducted and copies will be available on
the City website listed below at least 10
days prior to the public hearing.
For more information or to receive copies
of the DNS, SEPA Checklist, Threshold
Determination, or the proposed amend-
ments, please contact: Lisa D. Key, Direc-
tor of Planning, Engineering & Building
Services, 22710 E. Country Vista Drive,
Liberty Lake, WA 99019. Phone: 509-755-
6708, Fax: 509-755-6713, Email: lkey@
libertylakewa.gov. Information is also
available on the City website at http://www.
libertylakewa.gov/196/Public-Notices. In-
dividuals planning to attend the hearing
who require special assistance to accom-
modate physical, hearing, or other impair-
ments, please contact the City Clerk at
(509) 755-6729 within at least 48 hours of
the meeting so that arrangements may be
made.
Hearing Date: October 13, 2021
Publication Date: September 3, 2021
892
___________ _______________________________________
________________ _________________________
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
FILE NO.: LUA2O21 -001 1 PROPOSAL: MTC Comp Plan Amendment & Zone Change — Ito M2
PROPOSAL LOCATION: NE Corner of E Mission Ave and N Molter Rd
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE, SS:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
On the day of 20 I personally
assumed the responsibility to ensure that adjacent property owners were notified by mail of the
proposed project listed above.
Mailings prepared by: Megan Abhold
Mailed by: Megan Abhold
Of Planning & Cmunity Development Department
Date
Meaan Abhold. Plannina & Enaineerina Technician
Print Name & Title
// / //
p //
Signature 1r
Notary: Signed and sworn to before me this f ‘ day of , 20 &)
A WORKMAN”
NOTARY PUBLIC #20101 513 NotaPublic in and for the State of Washington
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COMMISSION EXPIRES Residing at: d’e.t)
BER3,2
My Appointment Expires: D-h/’ 3, 2p2
THANK YOU
We have received your amendment submission. Please allow 1-3 business days for review. Please keep the Submittal ID as your receipt and for any future
questions. We will also send an email receipt to all contacts listed in the submittal.
Submittal ID: 2021-S-3217
Submittal Date Time: 10/05/2021
Submittal Information
Jurisdiction City of Liberty Lake
Submittal Type 60-day Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment
Amendment Type Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Amendment Information
Brief Description
Change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the Meadow Technology Campus from Light Industrial to Community Center Mixed Use
o Yes, this is a part of the 8-year periodic update schedule, required under RCW 36.70A.130.
Anticipated/Proposed Date of Adoption 12/07/2021
Attachments
Attachment Type File Name Upload Date
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Draft Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment.pdf 10/05/2021 03:11 PM
Staff Report LUA2021-0006 MTC Zone Change Draft Staff Report.pdf 10/05/2021 03:11 PM
Contact Information
Prefix Ms.
First Name Lisa
Last Name Key
Title Director of Planning & Engineering
Work (509) 755-6708
Cell (509) 344-9460
Email lkey@libertylakewa.gov
o Yes, I would like to be contacted for Technical Assistance.
Certification
n I certify that I am authorized to submit this Amendment for the Jurisdiction identified in this Submittal and all information provided is true and
accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Full Name Lisa D. Key
Email lkey@libertylakewa.gov
THANK YOU
We have received your amendment submission. Please allow 1-3 business days for review. Please keep the Submittal ID as your receipt and for any future
questions. We will also send an email receipt to all contacts listed in the submittal.
Submittal ID: 2021-S-3218
Submittal Date Time: 10/05/2021
Submittal Information
Jurisdiction City of Liberty Lake
Submittal Type 60-day Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment
Amendment Type Development Regulation Amendment
Amendment Information
Brief Description
Zoning Map amendment to change zoning designation of Meadowwood Technology Campus from I (Light Industrial) to M-2 (Community Center Mixed Use).
Companion to Case No. 2021-S-32-17
o Yes, this is a part of the 8-year periodic update schedule, required under RCW 36.70A.130.
Anticipated/Proposed Date of Adoption 12/07/2021
Attachments
Attachment Type File Name Upload Date
Development Regulation Amendment - Draft MTC Zoning Map Amendment.pdf 10/05/2021 03:19 PM
Staff Report LUA2021-0006 MTC Zone Change Draft Staff Report.pdf 10/05/2021 03:20 PM
Contact Information
Prefix Ms.
First Name Lisa
Last Name Key
Title Director of Planning & Engineering
Work (509) 755-6708
Cell (509) 344-9460
Email lkey@libertylakewa.gov
o Yes, I would like to be contacted for Technical Assistance.
Certification
n I certify that I am authorized to submit this Amendment for the Jurisdiction identified in this Submittal and all information provided is true and
accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Full Name Lisa D. Key
Email lkey@libertylakewa.gov
Exhibit D - Agency Comments
Spokane Tribe of Indians
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
P.O Box 100 Wellpinit WA 99040
September 1, 2021
To: Lisa Key, Planner
RE: LUA2021 -0011 Meadowood Technology Campus Comprehensive plan
Amendment & Zone change 1toM2
Ms. Key,
Thank you for contacting the Tribe’s Historic Preservation Office. We appreciate the
opportunity to provide a cultural consult for your project. The intent of this process is to
preserve and protect all cultural resources whenever protection is feasible.
As you know that the Spokane Tribe use of these area’s was extensive in years prior to
arrival of euro- Americans clearly the Spokane area was a great place of cultural and
economic importance to our tribe.
Recommendation: Case by Case review on each project and may require cultural
surveys or monitoring.
Should additional information become available our assessment may be revised.
Again, thank you for this opportunity to comment and consider this a positive action that
will assist in protecting our shared heritage.
If questions arise, please contact me at (509) 258 – 4222.
Regards,
Randy Abrahamson
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (T.H.P.O.)
From: Limon, Tara
To: Lisa Key
Cc: Weinand, Kathleen
Subject: RE: DNS & Adoption of Existing Environmental Docs - Meadowwood Technology Campus Comp Plan Amendment & Zone Change
Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 9:30:43 AM
Attachments: image001.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
CAUTION: This email originated outside the City of Liberty Lake. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
and know the content is safe.
Good Morning Lisa,
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. Below is STA’s comment. Please let me know if there are any
questions or concerns.
Spokane Transit serves this site with five bus stops. To maintain existing and future access to transit service at
this site, please coordinate any changes to bus stops or sidewalks with Spokane Transit. Please coordinate with
Tara Limon at (509) 343-1692 or tlimon@spokanetransit.com.
Thank you,
Tara Limon
Associate Transit Planner
Office: (509) 343-1692
SpokaneTransit.com
Sign up for regular STA text and email updates
From: Lisa Key <LKey@libertylakewa.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 9:35 AM
To: Kelsey Wright <kwright@libertylakewa.gov>; Megan Abhold <mabhold@libertylakewa.gov>; Wayne Hammond
<whammond@libertylakewa.gov>; Ben Schmitt <bschmitt@libertylakewa.gov>; Avista (Dave Byus)
<dave.byus@avistacorp.com>; blake.davis@avistacorp.com; CenturyLink (Karen Stoddard)
<karen.stoddard@centurylink.com>; mark.welch@centurylink.com; jrowell@cvsd.org; Coeur d'Alene Tribe Jill Wagner
<jwagner@cdatribe-nsn.gov>; Comcast (Vicki Whitt-Williams) <vicki_whitt-williams@cable.comcast.com>; Comcast
(Bryan Richardson) <bryan_richardson@cable.comcast.com>; awestby@spokanecleanair.org;
rogersg@spokanevalleyfire.com; Harvey, Traci <HarveyT@SpokaneValleyFire.com>; commprojects@srhd.org; Spokane
Tribe <randya@spokanetribe.com>; sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov; separegister@ecy.wa.gov; sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov;
figgG@wsdot.wa.gov; rstewart@srtc.org; bijay@libertylake.org; Consolidated Irrigation District
<consolidatedirrigation@comcast.net>; ckeo461@ecy.wa.gov; Knudson, Chris <CKnudson@spokanecounty.org>;
rstewart@srtc.org; Damon Simmons <dsimmons@libertylakewapd.gov>; Rose, Melanie
<Melanie.Rose@avistacorp.com>; Burchell, Melissa <MBurchell@spokanecounty.org>; tpoitevint@libertylake.org;
sepa.spokanevalley@spokanevalley.org; inspections@spokanevalleyfire.com; Limon, Tara
<tlimon@spokanetransit.com>; Weinand, Kathleen <KWeinand@spokanetransit.com>; Depner, Colin
<CDEPNER@spokanecounty.org>; Knudson, Chris <CKnudson@spokanecounty.org>; Bickley, Megan K.
<MBICKLEY@SpokaneCounty.org>; bgreene@spokanecounty.org; Damon Simmons <dsimmons@libertylakewapd.gov>;
Katy Allen <kallen@libertylakewa.gov>
Cc: Kevin Schneidmiller <kschneidmiller@greenstonehomes.com>; Michael Terrell <mterrell@mt-la.com>
Subject: DNS & Adoption of Existing Environmental Docs - Meadowwood Technology Campus Comp Plan Amendment &
Zone Change
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] This email originated from outside Spokane Transit. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe. Please report suspicious emails to the IS Help Desk.
Lisa D. Key
City of Liberty Lake
Director of Planning & Engineering
22710 E. Country Vista Drive
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
(509) 755-6708
Website: www.libertylakewa.gov
Exhibit E - Public Comments
From: Kyle Dixon
To: Cristella Kaminskas; Phil Folyer; Annie Kurtz; Hugh Severs; Dg Garcia; Odin Langford; Mike Kennedy; Dan Dunne
Cc: Katy Allen; Lisa Key
Subject: FW: Public comment on zoning in Rocky Hill
Date: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:19:00 AM
Hi Mayor and Council,
Please see written public comment below that was received last week.
Thanks,
Kyle Dixon
Finance Director
509-755-6702
libertylakewa.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: MaiLing Bell <tigerstripes22@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 7:30 PM
To: Ann Swenson <aswenson@libertylakewa.gov>
Subject: Zoning in Rocky Hill
CAUTION: This email originated outside the City of Liberty Lake. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom It May Concern:
want to put on public record that my household is opposed to more apartments especially in the Rocky Hill district.
The influx of traffic due to apartments would be potentially very dangerous to the children in this community that
play around these houses. Many vehicles already speed around there’s residential streets as well as large delivery
trucks and trailers.
I have been working from due to the pandemic for more than a year and half now. My home office looks out onto a
cul-de-sac and the speed and the amount of traffic is already concerning. I have watched a few times where drivers
are not paying attention.
There is no need for a multicomplex/apartments in a single family zoned neighborhood. Please keep Rocky Hill as
single-family zone.
Please add this to the public comment. I hope that this is helpful for those community leaders that will be charged
with making this decision
Sincerely,
Mai-Ling and Raymond Bell
Sent from my iPhone
Exhibit F - Trip Generation & Distribution Letter
Get email alerts for Liberty Lake
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.