Village of Los Lunas Council Agendas\Minutes

VILLAGE OF LOS LUNAS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Thursday, January 29, 2026 | 6:00PM Council Chambers | 660 Main Street Los Lunas, NM, 87031 ATTENTION: Village Council meetings are also streamed live via Microsoft TEAMS. You may connect with codes that are available on our website (www.loslunasnm.gov) and/or https://www.loslunasnm.gov/meeting. The Village of Los Lunas Council is pleased to have residents of the community take time to attend Village Council Meetings. Attendance and participation is encouraged. Individuals wishing to be heard during Public Input and Public Hearing proceedings are encouraged to be prepared and will be limited to three (3) minutes to allow everyone the opportunity to be heard. Public comments are expected to be constructive and devoid of character assassination. Questions raised on non-agenda items may be answered at a later date to facilitate proper research. Written comments are welcome and should be given to the Village Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Written materials will not be accepted during regular agenda items in the interest of time. Please turn off or mute all electronic devices during the meeting. Your cooperation is appreciated. • Call Meeting to Order • Pledge of Allegiance • Public Input Forum • Proclamation: The 250th Anniversary of the United States Post Office. Alex Ochoa 1. Crownover Rd NW Minor Subdivision Infrastructure Acceptance. TAB 1. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or disapprove. Alex Ochoa 2. 2026 Streets and Zoning Layer Approvals. TAB 2. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or disapprove. Victoria Archuleta 3. Better City Phase I Findings: An Overview of the Village of Los Lunas Strategic Plan. TAB 3. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Informational. 4. Approval of Minutes. TAB 4. a. Minutes from January 15, 2026, Council Meeting. 5. Adjournment. If you need a reader, amplifier, qualified sign language interpreter, or any other form of auxiliary aid or service to attend or participate in the meeting, please contact the Deputy Clerk five (5) days prior to the council meeting at 505-839-3840.  Proclamation on the 250th Anniversary of the United States Post Of�ice Whereas, 2025 is the year of the 250th Anniversary of the creation of the United States Post Of�ice, the predecessor of the modern Postal Service, one year earlier than the founding of the country itself, and later enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, and Whereas, the Postal Service has played a signi�icant role in the historical development of the country from the establishment of roads, railways, and airlines, and a vital part of the fabric binding together the people of the country, and Whereas, the Universal Service Obligation (USO) in current law which enables the population to receive equal and affordable services no matter who we are or where we live is a democratic right of the people, and Whereas, the U.S. Postal Service serves L69 million addresses six, and sometimes, seven days a week, and Whereas, the USPS does not receive taxpayer money but rather runs on its own revenue created by postage and postal products, and Whereas, due to its public mission, the Postal Service is the low-cost anchor of the $1.3 trillion dollar mailing and package industry which supports 7 million jobs across the country, and Whereas, the Postal Service is an important source of good, union, living-wage jobs with fair hiring practices and equal pay for equal work for workers from all walks of life, and is one of the largest employers of Veterans, and Whereas, any effort to privatize the USPS, in whole or in part, would undermine the very public mission of the Postal Service, the Universal Service mandate and the dedicated work of hundreds of thousands of public servants, and Whereas, while communication habits are always changing, the USPS remains a vital source of communications, the exchange of ideas, �inancial transactions, private and secure correspondence, mail-order medications, mail-in voting and e-commerce packages, and a host of opportunities for new and expanded services, and Whereas, the United States Postal Service is owned by the people and is a wonderful national treasure encapsulating the best of government "of, by and for the people." Now, therefore be it resolved, that on January 29, 2026 the Governing Body of the Village of Los Lunas goes on record in support of the public mission of the USPS contained in the 1970 Postal Reorganization Act which says; "The United States Postal Service shall be operated as a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution , created by Act of Congress and supported by the people. The Postal Service shall have as a basic function the obligation to bind the Nation together..." And, be it further resolved, that this body appreciates the role of the U.S. Postal Service on its 250th Anniversary, salutes the hard-working postal workers from all walks of life who serve the people and business community, and supports a robust and thriving public Postal Service for generations to come! APPROVED THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026. ________________________________________ Charles Griego, Mayor Attest: _________________________________ Gregory D. Martin, Village Administrator  VILLAGE COUNCIL Agenda Item Title: Crownover Rd NW Minor Subdivision Infrastructure Acceptance Presenter: Alex Ochoa Department: Community Development Meeting Date: January 29, 2026 Action Requested: ☒Approval/Disapproval ☐ Informational ☐Public Hearing ☐Other OVERVIEW/ ANALYSIS Aaron Chavez, Acting Agent for Daniel Romero, has requested Infrastructure Acceptance for a portion of Subd: Lands of Lucille M. Rocco and Francine Wild Tract: B S: 21 T: 7N R: 2E, with an assigned address of 1067 Highway 314 NW, and Subd: Land of Nicolas P Aragon Tract: A, With An Assigned Address Of 311 Crownover Rd NW, to dedicate to the Village of Los Lunas for right-of-way of Crownover Rd. NW. POSSIBLE ACTIONS  Approve item  Approve item, with changes  Deny item  Postpone item to a future meeting (direct staff to conduct further research)  Table item for future discussion (direct staff to conduct further research)  No action at this time STRATEGIC PRIORITIES ALIGNMENT ☐I-25 Interchange/Los Lunas Boulevard Corridor Project ☐Quality of Life Improvements ☐Infrastructure Improvements ☐Economic Development ☐Personnel ☒N/A BUDGET IMPACT N/A LEGAL REVIEW ☐Yes, by: ☒Not applicable ATTACHMENTS None  STAFF REPORT Village of Los Lunas Community Development PROPERTY INFORMATION Project Name: Crownover Rd NW_MS Application Date: 12/02/2025 Applicant Name: Aaron Chavez Application Type: Minor Subdivision Property Address: 1067 Hwy 314 NW, 311 Crownover P & Z Hearing Date: 01/07/2026 Rd NW Council Hearing Date: 01/29/2026 Property Owner: Daniel Romero, Ray Aragon Legal Description: Subd: LANDS OF LUCILLE M. ROCCO AND FRANCINE WILD Tract: B S: 21 T: 7N R: 2E, Subd: LAND OF NICOLAS P ARAGON Tract: A Summary of Applicant's Explanation of Request: VILLAGE OF LOS LUNAS Applicant is requesting to subdivide the current parcel into three parcels, and to dedicate a portion of Tract B and Lot A to the Village for right-of-way of Crownover Road NW. Proposed Use: Single Family Detached Residential Homes. ZONING INFORMATION Council District: 2 | Councilor Gino Romero Flood Zone: X Area Plan: N/A Current Zoning: A-R | C-1 Current Land Use: Single Family Detached Zoning to the North: A-R, S-U | SFD, Church Zoning to the East: A-R | SFD Zoning to the South: A-R, C-1 | SFD Zoning to the West: A-R | SFD NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT Publication: Valencia County News-Bulletin Certified Mail: Adjacent Property Owners 12/18/2025 Neighborhood Input: The Community Development Department has received 0 calls or letters in favor and 0 calls or letters in opposition of the request. STAFF COMMENTS *Municipal Code: Compliant *Comprehensive Plan: Compliant Staff reviewed the application and included comments in agenda packet. *Staff reviews certain aspects of the Village of Los Lunas Municipal Code (completeness of application, conformance with land use plan, conformance with comprehensive plan, etc.). The review is prepared prior to the scheduled public hearing in which additional evidence may be presented. Evidence provided may or may not support staff’s determination on whether an application is or is not compliant with the Municipal Code and other applicable documents. Depending on the case, the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Village Council has the final decision based on all evidence submitted.  PLAN SET ZONING MAP MACDOUGA LL LN NW Land Use Case R-2 Parcels R-3 4 NE Current Zoning C-1 ELD AV AY 31 CROWNO E NE C-2 A-R VER RD NW MAXFI R-R M-1 HIGHW R-1 S-U R-M TOD-R TOD-MU ELLEN RD NW LAND USE MAP MACDOUGA LL LN NW Land Use Case MFA Parcels MFD HIGHW E NE LandUse POS AY 31 CROWNO VER RD NW ELD AV AG SFA MAXFI 4 NE CO SFAG ID SFD IS VA ELLEN RD NW NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MAP MACDOUGA LL LN NW Land Use Case NE Notice of Public Hearing Adjacent Properties Parcels AY 31 E NE MAXFI 4 CROWNO VER RD NW ELD AV HIGHW ELLEN RD NW  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST STAFF REVIEW Project Name: Crownover Rd_MS Project Location: 1067 Hwy 314 NW Scheduled P&Z Hearing Date: 01/07/2025 Scheduled Council Hearing Date: 01/29/2025 *Staff Review Completed: 12/29/2025 Minor Subdivision Request: The applicant is requesting Minor Subdivision approval to create two additional parcels and to dedicate right-of-way of Crownover Rd NW to the Village. Applications, Permitting, and Enforcement: This application was submitted on December 2, 2025, to subdivide parcel Subd: Lands of Lucille M. Rocco and Francine Wild Tract: B S: 21 T: 7N R: 2E, with an address of at 1067 Hwy 314 NW, into three parcels. Community Development and Public Works met with the applicant on several occasions to discuss the access of the two proposed parcels. The applicant worked with the property owners of the subject parcel and the parcel with a legal description of Subd: Land of Nicolas P Aragon Tract: A, with a site address of 311 Crownover Rd NW, to request the dedication of a portion of Crownover Rd NW. The property proposed for three lots is a single parcel spanning approximately 2.5 acres. It is situated in a split zoning district, divided between C-1 to east accessed from Hwy 314 NW, and A-R to the west which is planned to be accessed from Crownover Rd NW. If the Minor Subdivision is approved by Village Council and the Site Plan Deviation Application approved, proposed Tract B-3 to the east will remain C-1 with single family residential use and , consistent with its current classification and frontage on Hwy 314. Proposed tracts B-1 and B-2 on the west will continue to be designated A-R. Due to the dedication of right-of-way, this results in lot sizes smaller than the one-acre minimum required in the A-R zoning district for proposed Tract B-1 and Tract B-2. To address this, the applicant has submitted a separate Site Plan Deviation request. The requested deviation is 0.1 acre per lot, qualifying for the 10% Site Plan Deviation pending approval by the Community Development Director. Separate from the Site Plan Deviation and Minor Subdivision request, there will be an agenda item presented to the Council for Acceptance for Maintenance of the existing road. If Council approves the Minor Subdivision with the right-of-way dedication, they will simultaneously be asked to accept the dedicated road into the public maintenance system in its current condition. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this application on January 7, 2026, and with a 3-0 vote, recommended approval of the application as presented with the condition that the submitted 10% site plan deviation be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Minimum Lot Size Required: C-1: .25 acre, A-R: 1 acre Staff Comment: At .455 acres the proposed C-1 parcel is compliant. At .9 acre the proposed A-R parcels are below the minimum required; however, the applicant has requested a Site Plan Deviation to address this concern. Minimum Lot Width Required: C-1: 40ft., A-R: 100ft.  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Staff Comment: Compliant Density Requirements: N/A Staff Comment: N/A Minimum Street Width Required: Per the Village Development Process Manual, 40ft. Staff Comment: Compliant Applicable Codes: Section 16.08.010 – Definitions "Dedication" means the appropriation of land, or an easement therein, by the owner, for the use of the public, and accepted for such use by or on behalf of the public. "Right-of-way" means land reserved for uses as a street, alley, crosswalk, or other public ingress and egress. Section 16.12.010 – Conformance to design standards All subdivisions within the village and its planning and platting jurisdiction shall conform to minimum design standards established by the village with the approved "Village of Los Lunas Design Standards" document. Section 16.12.020 – Modifications and exceptions Whenever the tract to be subdivided is of such unusual size or shape and/or surrounded by such development or unusual conditions that the strict application of these regulations would result in real difficulties and substantial hardships, the council may vary or modify the requirements, so that the subdivider is allowed to develop the property in a reasonable manner, but at the same time so that the public welfare and interests of the village are protected and the general intent and spirit of these regulations are preserved. However, such relief may not be granted if it is detrimental to these regulations or the desirable development of the community in accordance with plans and policies of the village. Any modification granted shall be entered in the records of the council setting forth the reasons that justified the modification. Further, in granting modifications and exceptions, the council may place conditions that will in its judgment substantially secure the objectives of the standards or requirements involved. Section 16.24.060 - Land acceptance. Approval of the minor subdivision by the council shall be deemed to constitute acceptance by the village of dedication of proposed public easements, and public areas shown on the plat, excluding streets, provided the plat is properly recorded with the Valencia County Clerk and the community development director. Authority: Section 16.24.040 - Decision. Following review of the minor subdivision application package and following negotiations with the applicant on changes as may be deemed advisable, the commission shall issue a recommendation to council on the complete application package as submitted or modified. After the council holds a public hearing to review the application package and the recommendations of the commission, it may be approved by the council.  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. Approval. If the minor subdivision is approved by the council, such approval shall be recorded on the face of the original drawing of the plat and on three copies thereof and shall be dated and verified by the signature of the mayor or designated representative of the council. 2. Disapproval. Should the minor subdivision be disapproved, the council shall express in writing the reasons for disapproval. The reasons for disapproval shall be referenced and attached to two copies of the plat. One of the copies shall be returned to the subdivider and the other shall become part of the files of the community development director's office. 17.06.040 Residential Zone Districts A. Agricultural and Residential Zone District (A-R): The purpose of the A-R zone district is to accommodate and encourage agricultural and rural residential land uses on large lots where residents engage in agricultural, horticultural, and animal husbandry activities; and in areas served by public water and sewer facilities or as applicable in consultation with the Public Works Department. 1. A-R Dimensional Standards. 2. A-R District Standards. i. A maximum of one primary dwelling unit shall be allowed on an A-R zoned lot. ii. Accessory structures shall be allowed on an A-R zoned lot provided they meet the setback standards listed in Table 17.06.040(1) and separation standards contained in Section 17.10.060(B) Accessory Structure. iii. One accessory dwelling unit (ADU) shall be allowed on an A-R zoned lot provided it meets the setback standards in Table 17.06.040(1) and the standards listed in Section 17.10.060(A) Accessory Dwelling Unit. 17.06.050 Commercial and Office Zone Districts A. Neighborhood Commercial (C-1): The purpose of the C-1 zone district is to accommodate the neighborhood-scale commercial and office needs of the community in areas served by public water and sewer facilities. 1. C-1 Dimensional Standards.  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2. C-1 District Standards. i. Any portion of a primary building within 75 feet of a lot line that abuts a lot that is zoned or is in use for single-family residential purposes shall step down to a maximum height of 30 feet. ii. Where commercial development abuts a residential zone, the commercial development shall meet the setback requirement for the lot line of the residential zone to which it is contiguous. For example, if the side area of the commercial development is contiguous to a residential zone that requires a 10-foot minimum side setback, the commercial development shall be required to provide a 10-foot minimum side setback, for a total separation of 20 feet. iii. Where a single-family residential development is approved in a C-1 zone, the residential development shall meet the setback requirements of the R-1 zone district. a. Accessory structures shall be allowed on a C-1 zoned lot, with a primary residential use, provided they meet the setback standards of the R-1 zone as outlined in Table 17.06.040(3) and separation standards listed in Section 17.10.060(B) Accessory Structure. iv. A C-1 zoned development may have up to four primary uses provided those uses comply with all other relevant provisions of this Ordinance and do not create significant adverse impacts on surrounding properties. Any C-1 zoned development in excess of four primary uses shall comply with the provisions set forth in subsection 17.06.070 Special Use and any other relevant provisions within this Ordinance. Public Input: In Favor: 0 Opposed: 0 Documents: Village of Los Lunas Municipal Code: https://library.municode.com/nm/los_lunas/codes/code_of_ordinances Village of Los Lunas Comprehensive Plan: https://www.loslunasnm.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11100/Village-of-Los-Lunas-2040-Comprehensive- Plan Municipal Zone Code: https://loslunasnm.gov/DocumentCenter/View/15178/Ordinance-481_Zoning-Code-Update-PDF *Staff reviews certain aspects of the Village of Los Lunas Municipal Code (completeness of application, conformance with land use plan, conformance with comprehensive plan, etc.). The review is prepared prior to the scheduled public hearing in which additional evidence may be presented. Evidence provided may or may not support staff’s determination on whether an application is or is not compliant with the Municipal Code and other applicable documents. Depending on the case, the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Village Council has the final decision based on all evidence submitted.  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Village of Los Lunas Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on January 7, 2026, in the Village Council Chambers located at 660 Main St NW, Los Lunas, New Mexico to consider the following application. AARON CHAVEZ, ACTING AGENT FOR DANIEL ROMERO, HAS REQUESTED MINOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR SUBD: LANDS OF LUCILLE M. ROCCO AND FRANCINE WILD TRACT: B S: 21 T: 7N R: 2E, WITH AN ASSIGNED ADDRESS OF 1067 HIGHWAY 314 NW, AND SUBD: LAND OF NICOLAS P ARAGON TRACT: A, WITH AN ASSIGNED ADDRESS OF 311 CROWNOVER RD NW, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING THREE PARCELS AND TO DEDICATE A PORTION OF TRACT B AND TRACT A TO THE VILLAGE OF LOS LUNAS FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CROWNOVER RD NW AND HIGHWAY 314 NW. The Village of Los Lunas Council will subsequently hear and decide this case at 6:00 p.m. on January 29, 2026, in the Chambers located at 660 Main St. NW, Los Lunas, NM. The full agenda will be available no later than 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting, on the Village website – loslunasnm.gov – and also posted at the Village of Los Lunas Council Chambers. All persons have a right to attend this public hearing. Property owners who received notice of this hearing by certified mail have legal standing for their opposition or support of the item to be included in the public record. For statements of opposition or support to be included in the agenda packet, they must be received in written form by December 29, 2025 for the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing and January 19, 2026 for the Village Council hearing. Submit written statements in person, via mail or via email to the contact information listed below. Statements can also be made during the public hearings. Questions? Contact the Village of Los Lunas Community Development Department at (505)352-7659, 660 Main St. NW Los Lunas, NM 87031, or at planning@loslunasnm.gov. Publish: December 18, 2025 Valencia County News Bulletin CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON CRUZ MUÑOZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842  Dept 880697 PO Box 29650 Phoenix, AZ 85038-9650 Phone: (505)823-3220 Proof of Ad 12/10/2025 Account: 1002618 Name: VILLAGE OF LOS LUNAS Company: VILLAGE OF LOS LUNAS 660 MAIN ST NW Address: LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 Telephone: (505)839-3840 Ad ID: 334160 Description: Run Dates: 12/18/2025 - 12/18/2025 Class: 3001 Orig User: master Words: 341 Lines: 84 Agate Lines: 134 Depth: 9.54 Blind Box: Total Ad Cost $108.91 Amount Paid $0.00 Publication Start Stop Inserts Cost Valencia County News Bulletin 12/18/2025 12/18/2025 1 100.78 ORTEGA EMMA VICTORIA & ORTEGA RAUL XAVIER 224 BONITA LANE NW LOS LUNASNM 87031 MAXFIELD RHONDA K 1252 HWY 314 NW LOS LUNASNM 87031 FRANCO JESSICA L 248 CROWNOVER RD LOS LUNASNM 87031 CASTILLO MARTIN T GALLEGOS 251 CROWNOVER STREET LOS LUNASNM 87031 BARRIOS GARCIA LEOBARADO & TREJO VELOZ VERONICA 1104 MAXFIELD AVE NE LOS LUNASNM 87031 SCHROEDER MARK S & SCHROEDER LISA A 1119 HIGHWAY 314 NW LOS LUNASNM 87031 ARAGON FAY G 351 CROWNOVER RD NW LOS LUNASNM 87031 MACDOUGALL DONALD J & RIVERS KAY L TRUST MACDOUGALL DONALD J & RIVERS KAY L (TRUSTEES) 413 MACDOUGALL LN NW LOS LUNASNM 87031 LAMB LOUIS W & LAMB SHIRLEY L 1027 HIGHWAY 314 NW LOS LUNASNM 87031 WRIGHT ROSA BOX 576 PERALTA NM 87042 PEREA ANNETTE R & PEREA RONALD O 359 CORTEZ ST LOS LUNASNM 87031  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT December 12, 2025 Aaron Chavez 6 Lemons Dr. Los Lunas, NM 87031 ucbillc@gmail.com RE: Minor Subdivision Application for Subd: Lands of Lucille M. Rocco and Francine Wild Tract: B S: 21 T: 7N R: 2E, 1067 Hwy 314 NW and 1069 Crownover Rd NW and, Subd: Land of Nicolas P Aragon Tract: A, 311 Crownover Rd NW Dear Mr. Chavez, This letter is to inform you that the Community Development Department has received your application for Minor Subdivision approval. The Village of Los Lunas Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on January 7, 2026, in the Village Council Chambers located at 660 Main St. NW, Los Lunas, NM to consider your application. The Village of Los Lunas Council will subsequently hear and decide this case at 6:00 p.m. on January 29, 2026, in the Chambers located at 660 Main St. NW, Los Lunas, NM. Enclosed is a fee grid for the Notices of Public Hearing publications in the Valencia County News- Bulletin, and certified mail letters. Please ensure the fees are paid no later than December 26, 2025. Please be aware that Village Offices will be closed on December 24th and 25th, for the Christmas holiday. Please be prepared to present your case to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Village Council. If you have a visual presentation, please supply it to staff no later than January 6, 2026. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office at (505)352-7659 or planning@loslunasnm.gov. Sincerely, Matthew E Ryan Current Planner CC: Alex Ochoa, ochoaa@loslunasnm.gov; Sonia Walker, walkers@loslunasnm.gov Enclosed: Fee Grid CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON CRUZ MUÑOZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842 Village of Los Lunas Project Inquiry - Payment Allocations 12/29/2025 9.11.17 Project: Crownover Rd_MS (1069 Hwy 314 NW_MS) Page: 1 Date Type Fee Number Due at Source ID Quantity Description Amount 12/03/2025 Payment 1.000056512 .00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 295.00- 12/03/2025 Fee 305 Setup 2.00 Minor Plat Fee 270.00 12/03/2025 Fee 315 Setup .00 Recording Fees 25.00 12/03/2025 Fee 313 Setup .00 Notice of Public Hearing Publication 108.91 12/03/2025 Fee 314 Setup 11.00 Notice of Public Hearing - Cert Mail 114.84 12/16/2025 Payment 1.000056671 .00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 223.75- .00  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION 26-01 Village of Los Lunas Planning and Zoning Commission WHEREAS, Daniel Romero represented by Aaron Chavez has applied for Minor Subdivision approval for the property described as Subd: Lands of Lucille M. Rocco and Francine Wild Tract: B S: 21 T: 7N R: 2E, With an Assigned Address of 1067 Highway 314 NW, and Subd: Land of Nicolas P Aragon Tract: A, with an assigned address of 311 Crownover Rd NW, for the purpose of creating three parcels and to dedicate a portion of Tract A and Tract B to the Village for right-of-way of Crownover Rd NW. WHEREAS, the Commission has held a public hearing and has met the public notice requirements; NOW THEREFORE COMES THE VILLAGE OF LOS LUNAS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Recommending that the Village of Los Lunas Council approve the Minor Subdivision as presented with the following recommendations and findings: 1. The Planning & Zoning Commission has set the following conditions for the recommended approval. • Approval of the 10% Site Plan Deviation, allowing for a deviation of the 1-acre lot size minimum for the A-R zoned parcels from 1-acre to 0.9-acre. CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON CRUZ MUÑOZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT January 8, 2026 Mr. Aaron Chavez 6 Lemons Dr. Los Lunas, NM 87031 ucbillc@gmail.com RE: Crownover Rd Minor Subdivision, 1067 Hwy 314 NW, 1069 Crownover Rd NW, and 311 Crownover Rd NW, Application Status Dear Applicant, This letter is to inform you that, as scheduled, on January 7, 2026, The Village of Los Lunas Planning and Zoning Commission heard your submitted application referenced above. The Planning & Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the application as presented. The Planning & Zoning Commission has set the following conditions for the recommended approval. 1. Approval of the 10% Site Plan Deviation, allowing for a deviation of the 1-acre lot size minimum for the A-R zoned parcels from 1-acre to 0.9-acre. As scheduled, the Village Council will hear and decide the case on January 29, 2026, at the Village Council Chambers located at 660 Main St NW, Los Lunas, NM. Please be prepared to present your case to the Village Council. If you have an updated visual presentation for the public hearing, please supply it to staff no later than January 19, 2026. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office at (505)352- 7659 or planning@loslunasnm.gov . Sincerely, Matthew. E Ryan Current Planner CC: Michael Jaramillo, jaramillom@loslunasnm.gov; Brittany Armijo, pereab@loslunasnm.gov; Alex Ochoa, ochoaa@loslunasnm.gov; Sonia Walker, walkers@loslunasnm.gov; Mary Askew, langleym@loslunasnm.gov CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON MATTHEW D. CHAVEZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842  VILLAGE COUNCIL Agenda Item Title: 2026 Streets and Zoning Layer Approvals Presenter: Alex Ochoa Department: Community Development Meeting Date: January 29, 2026 Action Requested: ☒Approval/Disapproval ☐ Informational ☐Public Hearing ☐Other OVERVIEW/ ANALYSIS The agenda item seeks approval of the 2025 Village GIS Zoning and Streets layers. Please reference the attached memo for specific changes approved by Council throughout 2025. POSSIBLE ACTIONS  Approve item  Approve item, with changes  Deny item  Postpone item to a future meeting (direct staff to conduct further research)  Table item for future discussion (direct staff to conduct further research)  No action at this time STRATEGIC PRIORITIES ALIGNMENT ☐I-25 Interchange/Los Lunas Boulevard Corridor Project ☐Quality of Life Improvements ☐Infrastructure Improvements ☐Economic Development ☐Personnel ☒N/A BUDGET IMPACT LEGAL REVIEW ☐Yes, by: ☒Not applicable ATTACHMENTS 2025 GIS Layer Approvals Council Memo  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Village Council FROM: Sonia Walker, Community Planner CC: Community Development Department DATE: January 29, 2026 RE: Village of Los Lunas Approval of GIS Layers: Zoning & Streets OVERVIEW This agenda item seeks approval of the 2025 Village GIS layers: Zoning and Streets. The notable changes have been listed in the tables below and identified in the attached maps. To view the maps in full size, please follow the link below. Link: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/bz0ubh4nocr7ljxj3ztbx/2025- Zoning_Exhibit.pdf?rlkey=vjifzlc9r984xnvw8r0t4473v&st=5mm0rk1z&dl=0 Zoning Continued Next Page CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON MATTHEW D. CHAVEZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Link: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/86trt5zsfa0a3fpbxuslc/2025- Streets_Exhibit.pdf?rlkey=33tr3pcsw1fhgagwdwnw4tbs2&st=myz804qu&dl=0 Streets Continued Next Page CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON MATTHEW D. CHAVEZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Continued Next Page CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON MATTHEW D. CHAVEZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CHARLES GRIEGO GINO ROMERO JAMES T. RUNYON MATTHEW D. CHAVEZ CHRISTOPHER S. ORTIZ GREGORY D. MARTIN MAYOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR COUNCILOR VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR www.loslunasnm.gov Location & Mailing Address: 660 MAIN STREET NW LOS LUNAS, NM 87031 (505) 839-3842  VILLAGE COUNCIL Agenda Item Title: Better City Phase I Findings: An Overview of the Village of Los Lunas Economic Development Strategic Plan Presenter: Victoria Archuleta, Senior Economic Developer and Jason Godfrey, CEO, Better City Department: Economic Development Division/Administration Meeting Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Action Requested: ☐Approval/Disapproval ☒ Informational ☐Public Hearing ☐Other OVERVIEW/ ANALYSIS This presentation will provide an overview of the completed Phase I of the Village of Los Lunas’ Economic Development Strategic Plan, conducted by Better City. Phase I included a data-driven review of local economic conditions and extensive stakeholder engagement through focus groups, interviews, a community visioning workshop, and a public survey. The results establish a foundational understanding of the Village’s strengths, challenges, and opportunities and will inform and guide the development of targeted 5- and 10-year strategies. The council is being asked to provide feedback and input as we enter in to Phase II of the planning process and help guide the future of the village’s economic development landscape. POSSIBLE ACTIONS  Approve item  Approve item, with changes  Deny item  Postpone item to a future meeting (direct staff to conduct further research)  Table item for future discussion (direct staff to conduct further research)  No action at this time STRATEGIC PRIORITIES ALIGNMENT ☐I-25 Interchange/Los Lunas Boulevard Corridor Project ☐Quality of Life Improvements ☐Infrastructure Improvements ☒Economic Development ☐Personnel ☐N/A BUDGET IMPACT $65,597.13 approved by council for FY26. LEGAL REVIEW ☐Yes, by: ☐Not applicable ATTACHMENTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN INTERIM REPORT Village of Los Lunas, New Mexico A Decision Framework for Council Prepared by Better City, LLC January 2026 1. Introduction After months of community engagement, data analysis, and stakeholder conversations, clear themes have emerged that require Council input before the final Economic Development Strategic Plan can be completed. This interim report presents findings from our engagement process and brings five topics to Council for feedback. It also presents a strategic choice about growth philosophy that will fundamentally shape the priorities, investments, and staffing recommendations in the final plan. Why Council Input Is Essential Now The themes that emerged from community engagement point to fundamentally different approaches to managing Los Lunas' rapid growth. These are not technical questions for staff to resolve—they are policy and values decisions that elected officials must make on behalf of the community. Council's direction on these topics will determine: • Which economic development priorities receive focus and resources • How the Economic Development Department's role should evolve • What level of cross-departmental coordination is needed • How to balance growth momentum with quality-of-life investments Not all topics raised in this report will be fully addressed in the final Economic Development Strategic Plan. Some issues, like traffic, housing policy and homelessness services, extend beyond the scope of economic development alone. However, they are presented here because they emerged consistently in community feedback and intersect with economic development outcomes. 2. Where We Are So Far Between October 2025 and January 2026, Better City conducted community engagement to understand resident priorities, business perspectives, and stakeholder concerns about Los Lunas' economic future. Community Engagement Summary Engagement Activity Participants & Details Community Survey 500 responses from residents, workers, and those who spend time in Los Lunas Local Leaders Survey 22 responses from elected officials, business leaders, and community stakeholders  Focus Groups Sessions with: • Local business owners • Housing developers, industry experts and community stakeholders • Leaders and community members focused on quality of life • high school students Stakeholder Interviews 8 One-on-one conversations with Mayor, department heads, and key community leaders Visioning Workshop Community session with 12 residents to explore shared goals and identify priorities for Los Lunas' future Data Review Conducted The following plans, economic data, and market conditions, were analyzed: • Los Lunas 2040 Comprehensive Plan • Retail leakage and consumer spending patterns • Business location and industry composition data • Demographic and workforce trends (Census, BLS, NM GRT Tax, etc.) • Commercial, Residential, and Industrial Real Estate market data • Traffic statistics • Los Lunas budget w/analysis • Regional economic indicators This interim report is not intended to be an exhaustive review or synthesis of the community engagement findings and the data analysis but rather is a concise presentation of a few select topics of interest for consideration by the Council. 3. Five Key Topics The following topics emerged consistently across surveys, focus groups, and stakeholder interviews: Topic 1: Traffic Congestion Community Feedback Traffic congestion dominated community feedback as the most visible and immediate impact of Los Lunas' rapid growth. Of 500 community survey respondents, 91.2% reported that traffic and congestion make it hard to get around, 80% selected traffic as top economic development priority. Of 22 of local leaders survey respondents, 82% identified Main Street congestion as the top constraint. Concerns about traffic surfaced in every focus group and stakeholder interview. Residents described: • Travel times that vary unpredictably (12 minutes or 45 minutes for the same trip) • Key intersections and corridors overwhelmed during peak hours • Growing reluctance to cross town for daily activities • Concerns about emergency vehicle access and response times WHY THIS MATTERS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Traffic congestion affects economic development in three ways: • It impacts where residents shop and dine (increasing retail leakage) • It affects quality of life for current and prospective employees • It influences development decisions about where businesses locate within the Village. Important Context Addressing traffic issues falls outside the scope of an Economic Development Strategic Plan and will not be addressed within the report. It is highlighted here only as a significant community concern economic development impact. Topic 2: Housing Affordability and Diversity Community Feedback • Housing emerged as both an opportunity and a challenge. While Los Lunas remains more affordable than Albuquerque, residents expressed concern about rising costs and limited housing options beyond single-family detached homes. 37.0% of survey respondents disagree that housing is affordable – while 28.8% agree. • Focus group participants described a missing middle—housing options suitable for young adults, seniors, and families at various income levels. WHY THIS MATTERS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Workforce attraction and retention depend on housing availability at appropriate price points. Los Lunas has successfully attracted major employers with well-paying jobs, but if workers cannot find suitable housing locally, they commute from elsewhere or the jobs remain unfilled. Important Context Housing policy encompasses multiple departments and complex decisions about infrastructure investment, zoning, and water allocation. This Economic Development Strategic Plan will address housing only in terms of how it intersects with workforce availability and business recruitment, not as a comprehensive housing strategy. Topic 3: Homelessness and Social Services Community Feedback Homelessness emerged as a concern in focus groups and community conversations, particularly regarding public spaces and near the Rail Runner station. 166 out of 500 respondents (33.2%) selected "Addressing homelessness and social service needs" as one of their top 3 priorities. Participants described this as a relatively new issue in Los Lunas, with some attributing increased visibility to regional migration patterns and limited local social services infrastructure. Stakeholders noted: • Limited local resources for unhoused individuals • No designated shelter or coordinated services • Uncertainty about which entity or department leads coordination • Concerns about safety and perceptions in commercial areas WHY THIS MATTERS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Perceptions of safety and cleanliness affect retail viability, downtown revitalization efforts, and the overall attractiveness of Los Lunas as a place to live and invest. While homelessness is fundamentally a social services issue, its intersection with public space and commerce makes it relevant to highlight in economic development conversations. Important Context Addressing homelessness requires regional coordination, social services expertise, and dedicated funding beyond economic development’s capacity. The Economic Development Strategic Plan will not prescribe solutions for homelessness, but it will acknowledge this as a factor affecting quality of life and commercial development in specific areas. Topic 4: Retail — Perception vs. Retail Patterns Community Feedback Community members consistently expressed frustration about having to leave Los Lunas for shopping, dining, and entertainment. In the survey, residents identified how often they leave the Village for the following activities:  Activity Leave Monthly or More Dining out 92% Grocery shopping 82.0% Entertainment 75% Healthcare 72.7% Parks/recreation 58.2% Retail market data reveals a more nuanced story: • Overall, Los Lunas captures more total spending dollars from outside the Village than it loses to surrounding communities (retail surplus) • Specifically, there is large spending surplus in groceries and some restaurant categories • Leakage is concentrated in lifestyle categories—entertainment venues, specialty retail, and unique dining experiences • Los Lunas functions as a convenience retail destination rather than an experiential one Category Annual Surplus/Leakage Interpretation Restaurants +$20M surplus Regional destination: people come TO Los Lunas Groceries +$35M surplus Strong grocery capture Entertainment -$4.2M (92% leakage) No theaters, bowling—highly visible gap Furniture -$3.7M (79% leakage) Residents travel to Albuquerque WHY THIS MATTERS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The gap between perception and reality (the Village has strong retail in many but not all sections) should influence retail recruitment strategy. Tensions and Tradeoffs Retail follows rooftops, but rooftops without amenities create bedroom communities with only convenience retail. Intentional effort and public investment will be required to attract and curate a mix of experiential / destination retail and entertainment. Topic 5: Strategic Vision Community Feedback When asked about the preferred direction for Los Lunas' economic future:  • 57% chose “balance growth with quality of life” (parks, village center, housing options, traffic solutions) • 32% chose “improve quality of life with more careful or slower growth” • 6% chose “land more big employers, even if quality-of-life amenities come later” Combined, 89% of residents prioritized quality of life over an exclusive focus on employer recruitment. Leadership Perspective Local leaders surveyed (elected officials, business leaders, stakeholders) gave low ratings to questions about vision alignment and balancing the needs of the residents and local businesses with overall growth: Vision Question Average Score "Local stakeholders have a clear, shared economic vision" 2.82/5 "We're balancing big investments and small business needs" 2.73/5 "Growth benefits are broadly shared across neighborhoods" 2.68/5 WHY THIS MATTERS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Having a clear vision that is consistent with the community’s goals and desires gives staff and elected officials the political capital and public support necessary to make hard decisions and critical investments. Equity Many stakeholders raised concerns that Los Lunas' economic growth is not benefiting all neighborhoods and income levels equally. While median household income has risen, poverty has also increased from 11% to 18% between 2018 and 2023. Focus group participants described discernible disparities in park quality, infrastructure investment, and service provision among neighborhoods. 4. Strategic Direction: “Managing the Wave” vs. “Shaping the Wave” Los Lunas has been extraordinarily successful at attracting major corporate investment and managing rapid growth. The Village has secured over $3 billion in recent investment from Meta, Amazon, Walmart, and others. Population has nearly doubled since 2000. This success creates a critical choice about what comes next. The data from community engagement points to two fundamentally different approaches to economic development that lead to very different priorities, resource allocations, and outcomes. Scenario A: “Managing the Wave” This exemplifies Los Lunas' current trajectory: aggressively recruiting new businesses, responding to development proposals as they arrive, keeping pace with infrastructure needs, and letting market forces determine the retail and housing mix. Characteristics: • Economic development focuses on large business recruitment and project response • Infrastructure improvements follow growth • Developer preference drives housing (primarily single-family) • Retail environment develops organically based on rooftops • Departments operate independently in their lanes • Economic development staff at capacity Advantages: • Maintains maximum growth momentum and construction GRT revenue • Less controversial (doesn't require saying no to projects) • No implementation challenges (no major coordination changes) • Lower demand on staff time for coordination Risks: • Quality of life seems to be eroding • Traffic congestion could worsen • Los Lunas could become a bedroom community - lacking local gathering places • Benefits of growth may not be equitably distributed • Risk of getting “the worst of both”—continued congestion without improved amenities Scenario B: “Shaping the Wave” This approach uses Los Lunas' economic success as a foundation to pivot toward intentional, outcomes-driven development focused on quality of life. Characteristics: • Economic development becomes coordination-intensive “team sport” • Intentional focus on creating Village Center and local gathering places • Active work to diversify housing stock (multi-family, workforce, senior) • Curated retail mix emphasizing experience and local character • May require saying no to some projects that don't align with vision • Economic development department expands role as coordinator and advocate Advantages: • Aligns with community priorities (89% want quality-of-life focus) • Addresses root causes of resident frustration • Improves workforce attraction and retention • Creates foundation for generational continuity • Positions Los Lunas as complete community, not just employment center Tradeoffs / Risks: • Intentionally slower growth pace may reduce near-term GRT revenue • Requires expanded staff capacity and cross-departmental coordination • Longer timelines for some initiatives (less immediate positive press) • May involve turning down projects that don't fit vision • Demands stronger Council buy-in and political will Side-by-Side Comparison The following table summarizes key differences: Factor Scenario A: Manage Wave Scenario B: Shape Wave Primary Goal: Revenue and job growth Quality of life and resilience Economic Development Continue corporate recruitment Diversify: small business, retail, Focus: entrepreneurship Housing Mix: 90%+ single-family detached 80% single-family, 20% multifamily Economic Development Major employer recruitment, Small business support, retail Priorities: filling business parks, recruitment, placemaking / responding to site selectors redevelopment Resident Experience: Strong job market, limited local Complete community with local amenities jobs and amenities Economic Resilience: Dependent on major employers Diversified across sectors  Fiscal Strategy: Expand tax base through Slower revenue growth growth, high short-term revenues from impact fees 5. Economic Development Role Los Lunas’ Economic Development staff has been extraordinarily successful in executing on its primary mission of recruiting large employers to the Village and expanding the utilization of the industrial park. Other efforts focus on building long-term prosperity for the community by: • Supporting businesses to start, stay, and grow locally • Strengthening job quality and helping residents build careers • Creating places and amenities that make people want to stay • Diversifying revenue sources so the Village can maintain and improve services Responsibility Matrix Of the many things that impact economic vitality in Los Lunas, only a subset is the direct responsibility of the Economic Development Division. Community issues fall into three categories: Direct Responsibility: Shared Responsibility: Influence and Advocacy: ED Leads ED Partners/Co-Leads ED Advises Economic Development owns ED plays a key role alongside ED doesn't control these these outcomes and is other departments or outcomes but should have a accountable for results. organizations, but success seat at the table, bringing an requires collaboration. economic development perspective to decisions. Business retention and Quality-of-life improvements Transportation, traffic expansion (with Planning, Parks & management, and highway Recreation) improvements (with Public Business recruitment Works, NM DOT) (industrial and commercial) Small business support ecosystem (with Chamber, Housing diversity and land use Strategic planning SBDC, UNM–Valencia) planning (with Planning Department, Village Council) Marketing Los Lunas as a Workforce development and business location youth career pathways (with Regional coordination and Los Lunas Schools, UNM– annexation strategies (with Downtown and Village Center Valencia, major employers) Administration, Council, development projects County, Pueblo of Isleta) Administration of lodger’s tax Social services and support programs systems (with County, nonprofit partners, faith communities) Tourism development The growth trajectory Los Lunas chooses will reshape where Economic Development focuses its energy and what level of capacity is required. A strategy focused on managing major corporate growth requires different economic development skills and partnerships than one focused on small business development and quality of life. The roles and staffing levels of the economic development division are tied to the decision about the Village’s growth trajectory. Current Role (Managing the Wave Scenario) Economic Development currently operates as a standalone department focused primarily on business recruitment, site selection support, and responding to development inquiries. The department: • Directly leads business recruitment and corporate site selection  • Manages industrial park development and leasing • Coordinates with state economic development agencies • Administers tourism and lodgers tax programs • Collaborates with Planning on specific projects as needed Expanded Role If Council chooses to pivot in its approach to growth and economic development, the role and importance of economic development in the Village would expand significantly. Following are some of the areas where additional effort and resources would be required: • Small business support expansion • Entrepreneurial ecosystem - growth and strengthening • Focused retail recruitment – specifically targeting segments of the market that are underserved • Real estate development • Village center development • Targeted redevelopment • Creating incentive packages • Developer recruitment • Housing policy advocacy / recruiting muti-family developers • Transportation planning advocacy • Workforce development partnerships • Quality of life amenities – planning, coordination, funding These expanded roles and responsibilities would require additional capacity. The Village’s Economic Developer currently manages a substantial portfolio and has been remarkably successful in advocating for the Village, representing its interests, raising its profile, and creating an ecosystem that is appealing to businesses. Adding new areas of focus – particularly retail recruitment, focus on quality of life, and real estate development would exceed the current capacity and would necessitate adding additional support staff or redistribution of duties. 6. Next Steps With direction from the City Council, Better City will complete the Economic Development Strategic Plan with specific recommendations, implementation frameworks, and resource requirements aligned with the chosen approach. Los Lunas Economic Development Strategic Plan Interim Report to Council January 2026 | Better City Today’s Discussion Scenario A: Manage the Wave Scenario B: Shape the Wave Respond to opportunities as they arise Proactively direct growth toward community outcomes Agenda Community Engagement Summary Perspective on Growth Retail Surplus / Leakage Economic Development Priorities Growth Direction Role of Economic Development and ED Capacity What We Heard 482 22 8 1 4 Community Stakeholder Visioning Local Leaders Focus Groups Survey Interviews Workshop 88.2% of residents prefer growth that prioritizes quality of life  Traffic: The #1 Concern 91% Community Survey 91.3% (440 of 482) report traffic congestion as a challenge Local Leaders say traffic makes it 82% (18 of 22) cite Main Street congestion as top constraint hard to get around The Numbers 20,000-28,000 vehicles daily with limited alternatives Perspectives on Growth 7% 58.7% Balanced Growth Quality-of-life improvements with growth 34% 34.4% Careful, Slower Growth 59% Focus on existing neighborhoods 6.8% Aggressive Recruitment Continue pursuing big employers Resource: Community Survey Results  What Community Data Suggests Clear Community Preference 88% 88.2% (425 of 482) prefer quality of life approaches over aggressive corporate expansion (6.4%) Village Center Creating a village center with shops, restaurants and events is the 2nd priority of residents prefer quality-of-life focused growth Recreation Investment Aquatic center, pool, splash pad, and recreation facilities rank as 4th priority (31.1%) Residents Leave Town Frequently % Leaving Monthly+ Parks/Recreation 58.5 Healthcare 72.6 Entertainment 75.3 Groceries 82 Dining Out 91.7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 What this reveals: Despite strong retail fundamentals, residents perceive gaps and regularly travel to Albuquerque. Strategic focus on entertainment venues and dining diversity could shift perception. Economic Reality: Strong Foundation ✓ Regional Retail Hub (Annual Surplus) ✗ Spending outside the community (Annual Leakage) Vehicle Maintenance +$44M Entertainment -$4.2M (92%) Groceries +$35M Furniture -$3.7M (79%) Home Improvement +$27M Lodging -$4.7M (66%) Restaurants +$20M Electronics -$1.5M (95%) The Insight: Los Lunas has strong retail fundamentals, but highly visible gaps (entertainment, furniture) create perception of retail scarcity despite underlying strength Economic Development Priorities 59.1% Small Business 26.3% 72.7% Housing 46.3% Higher-Wage 81.8% Jobs 68.0% Parks & Quality 77.3% of Life 89.4% 77.3% Infrastructure 98.3% 0 20 40 60 80 100 Local Leaders (N=22) Community Survey (N=482) Methodology: Percentages reflect respondents who expressed interest in each theme through priorities selection, open-ended responses, or Likert scale gaps. Detailed methodology available upon request.  The Strategic Choice Council must decide which growth philosophy aligns with community priorities and resources Scenario A VS Scenario B Shape the Wave Manage the Wave Proactively direct growth toward Respond to opportunities as they arise community outcomes Scenario A: Manage the Wave ✓ Strengths Challenges Maintains economic momentum Quality-of-life improvements may lag Works within current staffing Traffic may not keep pace with growth Proven approach ($3B investment) Small business gets less focus Minimal regulatory hurdles Reactive rather than strategic Best suited for: Communities prioritizing economic growth, confident market forces will deliver desired outcomes Scenario B: Shape the Wave ✓ Strengths Challenges Addresses community preferences (88%) Requires sustained funding commitment Proactive traffic/infrastructure management Additional ED capacity needed Balances major employers & small biz Cross-departmental coordination required Positions Los Lunas as intentional Success depends on consistent implementation Best suited for: Communities wanting to direct growth outcomes, strong preference for quality-of-life focus, willing to invest in strategic management Role of Economic Development ED Leads ED Partners ED Advises Direct Responsibility Shared Responsibility / Collaboration Influence and Advocacy • Business retention and expansion • Quality-of-life improvements • Transportation, traffic management, and • Business recruitment (Community Development, Parks & highway improvements Recreation) • Housing diversity and land use planning • Strategic planning and implementation • Small business support ecosystem • Regional coordination and annexation • Marketing Los Lunas as a business (Chamber, SBDC, UNM–Valencia) strategies location • Workforce development and youth • Social services (homelessness) and • Downtown and Village Center career pathways (Schools, UNM– support systems development Valencia, employers) • Lodger’s tax revenue distribution Economic Development Capacity Different scenarios require different levels of economic development support Manage the Wave Shape the Wave Current Focus Expanded Scope • Respond to proposals • Real Estate (Re)Development • Corporate recruitment • Business climate improvement • ED strategic planning • Small business support • Marketing and branding of Los Lunas as a business • Cross-dept coordination location • Workforce development • Responding to site selection inquiries • Performance measurement • Major project coordination Staffing: Requires additional capacity (ED Specialist or Staffing: Current staffing adequate reallocate resources) Decision & Next Steps Council Discussion 1 Review scenarios and provide clear direction on growth philosophy Resource Planning 2 If choosing Scenario B: Address staffing, funding, and policy implications in budget planning Finalize Strategic Plan 3 Final Strategic Plan will be structured around Council's chosen direction with actionable strategies Critical Reminder: Scenario B requires committed funding, policy changes, and coordinated action. Under- resourcing this approach would be worse than honestly choosing Scenario A. Thank You Questions & Discussion Better City, LLC January 2026  MINUTES VILLAGE OF LOS LUNAS THURSDAY, JANUARY 15,2026 The Board of Trustees of the Village of Los Lunas, County of Valencia, and State of New Mexico met Thursday, January 15, 2026 in regular session at 6:00PM. Roll call was taken, and the following were present: Mayor Charles Griego, Councilman Gino Romero (Joined via Teams), Councilman James Runyon, & Councilman Christopher Ortiz. Councilman Cruz Munoz was excused. The meeting was conducted in person and recorded through TEAMs. Mayor: Charles Griego Mayor Pro Tem: Gino Romero Council: Christopher Ortiz Matthew Chavez James Runyon Also present were: Gregory D. Martin, Debra Sanchez, Craig Donohue, and Luis Brown. In accordance with Ordinance 114A, the following agenda was prepared and circulated as required: 1. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APPOINTMENT OF VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR. 2. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APPOINTMENT OF POLICE CHIEF. 3. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APPOINTMENT OF FIRE CHIEF. 4. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO TEM. 5. EXECUTIVE SESSION: a. Hire Engineer/EMT – Fire Department. b. Hire (3) Park Technician I – Parks Division / Parks & Recreation Department. c. Hire PT Recreation Aide – Recreation Division / Parks & Recreation Department. d. Discuss negotiation strategy and terms of a proposed Request for Proposal (RFP) for the donation of Village owned real property to a qualifying grantee for affordable housing, pursuant to NMSA 1978 , § 10-15-1(H)(8). 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: a. Minutes from December 18, 2025, Council Meeting 7. ADJOURNMENT. • CALL MEETING TO ORDER. At 6:00PM, Mayor Griego brought the meeting to order and welcomed the audience. • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Mayor Griego asked Uriah Chavez to lead the Council and TEAMS participants in the Pledge of Allegiance. • PUBLIC INPUT FORUM. Mayor Griego asked the audience if there was anyone who wanted to address the council that did not have an item on the agenda – Greg Martin approached the podium. He announced that the FY 2026 budget book was available. He credit Cheryl and Vanessa for their hard work and Sonia who designed the cover of the book. It is also accessible on the village website. 1. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APPOINMTENT OF VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR. Mayor Griego announced the reappointment of Gregory D. Martin for the position of Village Administrator. APPROVAL: Motion MOVED: Councilman Runyon SECONDED: Councilman Chavez CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 3 (Councilman Romero – no; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – Yes; Councilman Matthew Chavez - yes) FOR AND 1 AGAINST. 2. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APOINTMENT OF POLICE CHIEF. Mayor Griego announced the reappointment of Frank Lucero for the position of Police Chief. APPROVAL: Motion MOVED: Councilman Romero SECONDED: Councilman Ortiz CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero – yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – Yes; Councilman Matthew Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. 3. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APOINTMENT OF FIRE CHIEF.. Mayor Griego announced the reappointment of John Gabaldon for the position of Fire Chief. APPROVAL: Motion MOVED: Councilman Romero SECONDED: Councilman Ortiz CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero – yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – Yes; Councilman Matthew Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. 4. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING / APOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO TEM. Mayor Griego announced the appointment of Christopher Ortiz for the position of Mayor Pro Tem. APPROVAL: Motion MOVED: Councilman Romero SECONDED: Councilman Chavez CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero – yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – Yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. 5. EXECUTIVE SESSION. Mayor Griego announced that the Council would be going into executive session pursuant to NMSA 1978 Section 10-15-1(H), the following matters may be discussed in a closed session: Hiring of a Engineer/EMT, hire (3) Parks Technician I, hire PT Recreation Aide, and Discuss negotiation strategy and terms of a proposed Request for Proposal (RFP)for the donation of Village owned real property to a qualifying grantee for affordable housing, pursuant to NMSA 1978, , § 10-15-1(H)(8). APPROVAL: Motion to approve MOVED: Councilman Runyon SECONDED: Councilman Ortiz CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero – yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – Yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. 6:06PM At 7:08PM, Mayor Griego asked for a motion from Council to reconvene after discussion: Hiring of a Engineer/EMT, hire (3) Parks Technician I, hire PT Recreation Aide, and APPROVAL: Motion to approve. MOVED: Councilman Ortiz SECONDED: Councilman Runyon CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero – yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – Yes; Councilman Chavez) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. Regarding the Engineer/EMT – Mayor Griego recommended Gabrie Gutierrez. APPROVAL: Motion to approve. MOVED: Councilman Runyon SECONDED: Councilman Chavez CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero -yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. Regarding the PT Recreation Aide– Mayor Griego rerecommended Josiah David Griego. APPROVAL: Motion to approve. MOVED: Councilman Romero SECONDED: Councilman Chavez CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero -yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. Regarding the Parks Technician I– Mayor Griego rerecommended Nerval Ronalson.  APPROVAL: Motion to approve. MOVED: Councilman Romero SECONDED: Councilman Ortiz CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero -yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. Regarding the Parks Technician I– Mayor Griego rerecommended Joshua Edenfield. APPROVAL: Motion to approve. MOVED: Councilman Runyon SECONDED: Councilman Chavez CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero -yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. Regarding the Parks Technician I– Mayor Griego rerecommended Benjamin Davila. APPROVAL: Motion to approve. MOVED: Councilman Ortiz SECONDED: Councilman Romero CARRIED: Motion passed on a vote of 4 (Councilman Romero -yes; Councilman Ortiz – yes; Councilman Runyon – yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. Regarding the discussion on the negotiation strategy and terms of a proposed Request for Proposal (RFP)for the donation of Village owned real property to a qualifying grantee for affordable housing, pursuant to NMSA 1978, , § 10-15-1(H)(8), there was no decision made / staff was given direction to come back at future date with more information. 6. MINUTES Mayor Griego asked if there were corrections to the Council minutes of December 18, 2025 – there were none. APPROVAL: Motion to approve. MOVED: Councilman Runyon SECONDED: Councilman Ortiz CARRIED: Motion passed on vote of 4 (Councilman Romero – yes; Councilman Runyon – yes; Councilman Ortiz- yes; Councilman Chavez - yes) FOR AND 0 AGAINST. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Council meeting adjourned at 7:11 PM. ____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Gregory D. Martin, Village Administrator Charles Griego, Mayor