City Council
Regular MeetingMartinsville, VA · December 11, 2012
Minutes
December 11, 2012
The regular meeting of the Council of the City of Martinsville, Virginia, was held on December
11, 2012, in Council Chambers, Municipal Building, at 7:30 PM, with Mayor Kim Adkins presiding.
Council Members present included: Mayor Kim Adkins, Vice Mayor Kimble Reynolds, Gene Teague,
Mark Stroud and Danny Turner. Council Member-elect Sharon Brooks Hodge was also present.
Staff present included: Leon Towarnicki, Interim City Manager, Brenda Prillaman, Eric Monday,
Linda Conover, Wayne Knox and Mike Rogers.
Following the invocation by Council Member Stroud and Pledge to the American Flag, the
Mayor welcomed everyone to the meeting.
Recognition of outgoing Vice Mayor Reynolds: Mayor Adkins and fellow Council members
made remarks on the Vice Mayor Reynolds’ City Council service and how he had made the city better
due to his service. City Council made a formal presentation of the Key to the City to outgoing Vice
Mayor Reynolds. A reception honoring Mr. Reynolds was held at 6:30pm prior to the meeting
tonight.
Addendum: Mayor Adkins announced 2 items would be added to the agenda.
EDC update: Mark Heath updated Council on activities of the M-HC Economic Development
Corporation.
West Piedmont Workforce Investment Board update: Executive Director of the West
Piedmont Workforce Investment Board, Kim Adkins, gave a comprehensive quarterly update on the
WPWIB activities. Ms. Adkins called on Martinsville-Henry County Chamber of Commerce President
Amanda Witt who then gave a quarterly update on the WPWIB’s services to employers as the WPWIB
funds the Chamber to administer its services to the business community.
Update from Dr. Nina Huff regarding citizen survey: Dr. Nina Huff with the Piedmont
Governor’s School updated Council on the citizen survey project being conducted by her students.
Fiber Optic feasibility study: Leon Towarnicki briefed Council on the feasibility study
regarding possible expansion of the City’s fiber optic system to establish direction forward with the
project. At the November 13, 2012 meeting, a presentation was given to Council by Mr. Doug Dawson of
CCG Consulting on the feasibility study just completed by CCG regarding possible expansion of the City’s
fiber optic system. The system currently provides a combination of telephone and Internet services for
many City facilities as well as a number of private businesses. After lengthy discussion, staff was
directed to set up a Council worksession to focus on the business model only expansion.
Southside Neighborhood meeting staff update: Mr. Towarnicki provided detailed information on
specific areas of concern voiced by citizens and he pointed out that each concern has been addressed.
Organizational meeting date for City Council: Council agreed by consensus to set the
Organizational Meeting for Wednesday, January 2, 2013, at 9:00 am.
Fire truck financing resolution: Mr. Towarnicki reported that a Resolution is required by
Carter Bank & Trust in order to secure five-year financing, not to exceed $460,000.00, to underwrite
the cost for the purchase of a Pierce Pumper and to authorize the City Manager, Director of Finance,
and City Attorney to execute the required forms and assurances on behalf of the City. On a motion
by Gene Teague, seconded by Kimble Reynolds, with a 5-0 vote, Council approved the following
resolution:
December 11, 2012
Fund balance policy approval: Finance Director Linda Conover reviewed the proposed
fund balance policy advising that City Council is dedicated to maintaining an appropriate level
of fund balance sufficient to mitigate current and future financial risks and to ensure stable
tax rates. This policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to prepare financial
reports which accurately categorize fund balance as required by Governmental Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type
Definitions. Adoption of this policy enhances the usefulness of fund balance information
through clearer fund balance classifications that can be more consistently applied and by
clarifying existing governmental fund type designations. There are some differences
between fund balance and liquidity (cash-on-hand) because some assets reported in the
governmental funds inherently cannot be spent – the nonspendable portion of fund balance.
If resources are limited in how they can be spent due to externally enforceable legal
restrictions, they roll into fund balance as restricted. If the governing body limits the use of
fund balance, and that limitation can only be removed by that same governing body
through similar action, those fund balance resources are considered committed. If a
government has intentions for certain resources, but they are not externally restricted or
committed through formal governing body action, those resources are considered assigned
fund balance. If the general fund has net resources in excess of the other four categories
that surplus is considered unassigned. After discussion, a motion was made by Gene
December 11, 2012
Teague, seconded by Kimble Reynolds, with a 5-0 vote, to adopt the proposed fund balance
policy setting the 10% fund balance goal:
City of Martinsville, Virginia
Fund Balance Policy
I. Purpose
The City Council of the City of Martinsville, Virginia is dedicated to maintaining an appropriate level of fund balance sufficient
to mitigate current and future financial risks and to ensure stable tax rates; and, therefore, formally establishes this policy for
the City’s Fund Balance. This policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to prepare financial reports which
accurately categorize fund balance as required by GASB Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund
Type Definitions.
II. Components of Fund Balance
Fund balance is the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a governmental fund; it is not to be confused
with cash-on-hand. The following five fund balance classifications describe the relative strength of the spending constraints
placed on the purposes for which the resources can be used:
• Nonspendable Fund Balance – amounts that are not in spendable form (such as inventory, prepaids, and long-term
receivables) or are required to be maintained intact (endowment type funds);
• Restricted Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by their providers (such as grantors, creditors,
and higher levels of government), through constitutional provisions, or by enabling legislation;
• Committed Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by a government itself, using its highest level
of decision-making authority; to be reported as committed, amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless
the government takes the same highest level action to remove or change the constraint;
• Assigned Fund Balance – amounts a government intends to use for a specific purpose; intent can be expressed by
the governing body or by an official or body to which the governing body delegates the authority; residual amounts
in governmental funds other than the general fund; appropriation of existing fund balance;
• Unassigned Fund Balance – amounts that are available for any purpose; positive amounts are only reported in the
general fund.
III. Committed Fund Balance Policy
The City Council is the City’s highest level of decision-making authority and the formal action that is required to be taken to
establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance commitment is a motion approved by the City Council. The resolution must
either be approved or rescinded, as applicable, prior to the last day of the fiscal year for which the commitment is made.
The amount subject to the constraint may be determined in the subsequent period.
IV. Assigned Fund Balance Policy
The City Council has authorized the Finance Director as the official authorized to assign fund balance to a specific purpose as
approved by this fund balance policy.
V. Minimum Unassigned Fund Balance Policy
The City will attempt to maintain an unassigned General fund balance in the general fund equal to or greater than 10% of
operating expenditures.
VI. Resource Flow Policy
When fund balance resources are available for a specific purpose in more than one classification, it is the City’s policy to use
the most restrictive funds first in the following order: restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned as they are needed.
VII. Consolidation of Component Unit Year-End Fund Balance
Based on Budget Code in the Code of Virginia under section 15.2-2506 stating, “No money shall be paid out or become
available to be paid out for any contemplated expenditure unless and until there has first been made an annual, semiannual,
quarterly, or monthly appropriation for such contemplated expenditure by the governing body…”, all appropriations lapse as
of June 30 of each fiscal year. Prior to the completion of the annual audit, unspent funds remaining in the Component Unit –
School Fund shall revert back to the General Fund. As with all City Funds, these funds may be re-appropriated for the
following year, as approved by City Council.
Finance report: Finance Director Linda Conover presented the final finance report for FY12.
Based on actual figures and the FY12 re-appropriations as approved, the overall Fund Balance at the
end of Fiscal Year 2012 is $13,783,755, an increase of $1,323,637 over Fiscal Year 2011. The
unassigned Fund Balance, exclusive of Utilities, is $4,151,074, an increase of $1,710,713 over
FY11’s unassigned fund balance of $2,440,349. Actual revenues for FY12 for all funds were
$95,731,215; actual expenditures were $80,835,553. Adjustments made for depreciation and
capitalization of assets in the Utility funds were $4,123,633. Excess of revenues over expenditures
for General, Capital and Utility Funds were $16,606,051. Of these funds, $10,834,782 was re-
appropriated for use in FY13.
December 11, 2012
The draft version of the FY12 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report supports the information and
is currently being reviewed for final approval and it will be presented to Council in early 2013. On a
motion by Gene Teague, seconded by Mark Stroud, with a 5-0 vote, Council approved the finance
report.
Update on possible local government impacts due to federal sequestration: Mr. Towarnicki
provided an update on possible impact to local government in the event federal fund sequestration
automatically occurs beginning January, 2013. Potential impact could affect bonds, 599 funds,
HUD, unemployment benefits, etc. At this point, there is no clear cut picture of cuts and staff
provided this update to advise Council and citizens that this issue is being closely followed.
Consent agenda: On a motion by Kimble Reynolds, seconded by Mark Stroud, with a 5-0
vote, Council approved the following consent agenda:
BUDGET ADDITIONS FOR 12/11/12
ORG OBJECT DESCRIPTION DEBIT CREDIT
FY13
General Fund:
01100909 490104 Advance/Recovered Costs 1,500
01211070 501400 Circuit Court - Bonus 1,500
donation agreement with Judge Greer
Total General Fund: 1,500 1,500
CDBG Fund:
47102926 436428 Neighborhood Stabilization Program 25,350
47832379 508250 NSP3 - Land Acquisition 25,000
47832379 505005 NSP3 - Administrative Costs 350
Total CDBG Fund: 25,350 25,350
Business from floor: Dr. Mervyn King-commented on problems with skateboarders Uptown
causing damage. Council directed staff to bring back proposals on limiting skateboard activity
Uptown. Ural Harris-Stuart St.-concerns with city getting into cable business and delay in activity
on Henry Hotel solution. Chad Martin-thanked Vice Mayor Reynolds for his service and thanked City
for allowing a drop box for canned goods to be placed at City Hall. Ralph Lawson-on behalf of his
wife, Kathy Lawson, former Mayor, Mr. Lawson thanked Mr. Reynolds for his service to the city.
Council comments: Turner-extended holiday wishes to citizens; Stroud-encouraged organ
and blood donors. Vice Mayor Reynolds commented that it has been an honor and a privilege to
serve the city.
Interim City Manager comments: Mr. Towarnicki recognized 5 city employees who are
retiring with a total of 133 years of service and expressed gratitude for their lengthy service;
expressed condolences to family of public works employee, Jeff Nelson, who passed away; praised
city employees for their generosity in giving to the recent employee Tots for Tots campaign and the
employee United Way campaign; pointed out city will follow state employee schedule for holidays.
Closed Session: In accordance with Section 2.1-344 (A) of the Code of Virginia (1950, and as
amended) and upon a motion by Kimble Reynolds, seconded by Mark Stroud, with the following 5-0
recorded vote: Adkins, aye; Teague, aye; Stroud, aye; Reynolds, aye; and Turner, aye, Council
convened in Closed Session, for the purpose of discussing the following matters: (A) A personnel
matter as authorized by Subsection 1. (B) Consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff
members, attorneys or consultants pertaining to actual or probable litigation, or other specific legal
matters requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel, as authorized by Subsection 7. At
December 11, 2012
the conclusion of Closed Session, each returning member of Council certified that (1) only public
business matters exempt from open meeting requirements were discussed in said Closed Session;
and (2) only those business matters identified in the motion convening the Closed Session were
heard, discussed, or considered during Closed Session. On a motion by Kimble Reynolds, seconded
by Mark Stroud, with the following recorded 5-0 vote: Adkins, aye; Reynolds, aye; Teague, aye;
Stroud, aye; and Turner, aye, Council returned to Open Session.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:31 pm.
_______________________________ __________________________
Brenda Prillaman Kim Adkins
Clerk of Council Mayor
Agenda
RECEPTION 6:30PM—for VICE MAYOR KIMBLE REYNOLDS-2nd floor hallway-City Hall
7:30 p.m. regular session AGENDA--CITY COUNCIL---CITY OF MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA
Council Chambers – Municipal Building
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Invocation – Council Member Mark Stroud
Pledge to the American Flag
1. Recognition of outgoing Vice Mayor Kimble Reynolds. (15 mins)
2. Hear update from Martinsville-Henry County Economic Development Corp. (15 mins)
3. Hear quarterly report from West Piedmont Workforce Investment Board. (10 mins)
4. Consider fiber optic system feasibility study. (15 mins)
5. Hear staff update on Southside Neighborhood meeting follow up. (10 mins)
6. Set date for City Council organizational meeting. (5 mins)
7. Consider approval of resolution for fire truck financing. (5 mins)
8. Consider fund balance policy. (10 mins)
9. Hear finance report. (10 mins)
10. Consider approval of consent agenda. (2 mins)
A. Accept & appropriate budget adjustments.
11. Business from the Floor
This section of the Council meeting provides citizens the opportunity to discuss matters,
which are not listed on the printed agenda. In that the Council meetings are broadcast on
Martinsville Government Television, the City Council is responsible for the content of the
programming. Thus, any person wishing to bring a matter to Council’s attention under
this Section of the agenda should:
(1) come to the podium and state their name and address;
(2) state the matter that they wish to discuss and Council action being requested;
(3) limit their remarks to five minutes;
(4) refrain from making any personal references or accusations of a factually false and/or
malicious nature.
Persons who violate these guidelines will be ruled out of order by the presiding officer and
will be asked to leave the podium. Persons who refuse to comply with the direction of the
presiding officer may be removed from the chambers.
factually false and/or malicious nature. Persons who violate these guidelines will be ruled
out of order by the presiding officer and will be asked to leave the podium. Persons who
refuse to comply with the direction of the presiding officer may be removed from the
chambers
12. Comments by members of City Council. (5 mins)
13. Comments by City Manager. (5 mins)
14. Items to be considered in Closed Session, in accordance with the Code of VA, title 2.2, Chapter
37—Freedom of Information Act, Section 2.2-3711(A)—Closed Meetings, the following:
A. Personnel matter as authorized by Subsection 1.
B. Consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff members, attorneys or consultants
pertaining to actual or probable litigation, or other specific legal matters requiring the
provision of legal advice by such counsel, as authorized by Subsection 7.
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 1.
Department: City Council
Issue: Recognition of outgoing Vice Mayor Kimble Reynolds.
Summary: City Council will formally recognize Vice Mayor Kimble
Reynolds for his service on City Council.
Attachments: None
Recommendations: No action required
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 2.
Department: City Council
Issue: Hear an update from the Martinsville-Henry County Economic
Development Corporation.
Summary: Mark Heath of the EDC will give this update and answer any
questions.
Attachments: None
Recommendations: No action required
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 3.
Department: City Council
Issue: Hear an update from West Piedmont Workforce Investment
Board.
Summary: A representative of the West Piedmont Workforce Investment
Board will give this update and answer any questions.
Attachments: None
Recommendations: No action required
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 4.
Department: City Manager
Issue: Hear an update on the feasibility study regarding possible
expansion of the City’s fiber optic system.
Summary: At the November 13, 2012 meeting, a presentation was given to Council by
Mr. Doug Dawson of CCG Consulting on the feasibility study just completed by CCG
regarding possible expansion of the City’s fiber optic system. The system currently
provides a combination of telephone and Internet services for many City facilities as well
as a number of private businesses.
Staff will review with Council the main components of the study, answer questions, and
entertain discussion regarding the manner Council may choose to move forward with
this project.
Attachments: None. The feasibility study document has been sent electronically to
all Council members.
Recommendations: Staff recommends Council consider establishing a citizen
advisory committee for the purpose of reviewing the study in detail and presenting
recommendations back to Council. Additional details regarding such a committee will
be presented at the meeting.
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 5.
Department: City Manager
Issue: Hear a staff update on several issues discussed at the November
26, 2012 Southside Neighborhood community meeting.
Summary: At the November 26th Southside Neighborhood community meeting,
several issues were brought to Council’s attention regarding property maintenance,
graffiti, and trash/littering in the south side neighborhood.
As a follow up to the neighborhood meeting, staff will present information on these
issues.
Attachments: None
Recommendations: None/no action required at this time. Presentation is for
information purposes only.
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 6.
Department: City Council
Issue: Set date for City Council organizational meeting.
Summary: Per the City Attorney, the City Charter was amended to
January 1 for assuming office, with the organizational meeting
on the first weekday in January the City is open, unless
Council designates a certain date.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013, at 9:00 am in Council Chambers
is available if this date and time agrees with Council members.
Attachments: None
Recommendations: Set date.
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 7.
Department: Finance
Issue: Consider approval of Resolution for fire engine Lease-Purchase Agreement
Summary:
Consider adoption of a Resolution required by Carter Bank & Trust in order to secure five-
year financing, not to exceed $460,000.00, to underwrite the cost for the purchase of a
Pierce Pumper, and authorize the City Manager, Director of Finance, and City Attorney to
execute the required forms and assurances on behalf of the City.
Attachments: Resolution
Recommendations: Motion to adopt Resolution for Lease-Purchase with Carter Bank &
Trust.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Martinsville issued a RFP seeking proposals regarding the purchase of a New
Pierce Pumper; and
WHEREAS, the City entered into negotiations with the lowest bidder, Carter Bank & Trust for the
purchase of said Pumper for a sum not to exceed $460,000.00; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously authorized the purchase of said Pumper as an element of the
approved 2012-2013 budget; and
WHEREAS, Carter Bank & Trust has offered to finance said purchase by reimbursing the City the amount
thereof and taking from the City a lease-purchase agreement in the total principal not to exceed
$460,000.00 bearing interest at the rate of 1.60% per annum, which lease-purchase agreement will
obligate the City of Martinsville to repay the aforesaid indebtedness in ten consecutive semi-annual
installments, the first one not to exceed $49,274.85 and remaining installments of not more than
$48,048.19, each commencing on the fifteenth day of August, 2013, and on the fifteenth day every six
months thereafter until said principal and interest are fully paid, at which time Carter Bank & Trust shall
convey title to said equipment to the City; and
WHEREAS, Carter Bank & Trust has requested that this transaction be approved by a resolution of City
Council, and that the execution of the lease-purchase agreement between Carter Bank & Trust and the
City be specifically authorized; now, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Martinsville, Virginia, in regular session held on December
11, 2012 that the aforesaid transaction be, and it hereby is, approved in its entirety; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager be, and he hereby is, authorized and directed to enter
into that certain equipment lease-purchase agreement dated December 15, 2012 between Carter Bank
& Trust, as Lessor, and the City of Martinsville, Virginia, as Lessee, obligating the City of Martinsville,
Virginia to repay the principal sum of not more than $460,000.00, with interest thereon at the rate of
1.60% per annum, to Carter Bank & Trust in 10 consecutive semi-annual installments, the first one not
to exceed $49,274.85 and remaining installments of not more than $48,048.19, each commencing on
the fifteenth day of August, 2013 and on the fifteenth day every six months thereafter until said
principal and interest are fully paid, at which time title to said equipment shall vest in the City.
******
Attest:
Brenda Prillaman
Clerk of Council
Date Adopted
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 8.
Department: Finance
Issue: Consider review of Fund Balance Policy
Summary:
FUND BALANCE POLICY
The City Council is dedicated to maintaining an appropriate level of fund balance sufficient to
mitigate current and future financial risks and to ensure stable tax rates; and, therefore,
formally establishes this policy for the City’s Fund Balance. This policy also authorizes and
directs the Finance director to prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund
balance as required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54, Fund
Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions.
Adoption of this policy enhances the usefulness of fund balance information through clearer
fund balance classifications that can be more consistently applied and by clarifying existing
governmental fund type designations. There are some differences between fund balance and
liquidity (cash-on-hand) because some assets reported in the governmental funds inherently
cannot be spent – the nonspendable portion of fund balance. If resources are limited in how
they can be spent due to externally enforceable legal restrictions, they roll into fund balance
as restricted. If the governing body limits the use of fund balance and that limitation can only
be removed by that same governing body through similar action, those fund balance resources
are considered committed. If a government has intentions for certain resources, but they are
not externally restricted or committed through formal governing body action, those resources
are considered assigned fund balance. If the general fund has net resources in excess of the
other four categories that surplus is considered unassigned. Examples for each category are
provided on the annotated version attached.
Attachments: Fund Balance Policy.doc
Fund Balance Policy annotated version for discussion.doc
FUND BALANCE SUMMARY 12-11-12.xls
Recommendations: For review and comments by Council, and possible consideration of
adoption of fund balance policy.
City of Martinsville, Virginia
Fund Balance Policy
I. Purpose
The City Council of the City of Martinsville, Virginia is dedicated to maintaining an
appropriate level of fund balance sufficient to mitigate current and future financial risks and
to ensure stable tax rates; and, therefore, formally establishes this policy for the City’s Fund
Balance. This policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to prepare financial
reports which accurately categorize fund balance as required by GASB Statement No. 54,
Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions.
II. Components of Fund Balance
Fund balance is the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a governmental
fund; it is not to be confused with cash-on-hand. The following five fund balance
classifications describe the relative strength of the spending constraints placed on the
purposes for which the resources can be used:
• Nonspendable Fund Balance – amounts that are not in spendable form (such as
inventory, prepaids, and long-term receivables) or are required to be maintained
intact (endowment type funds);
• Restricted Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by their
providers (such as grantors, creditors, and higher levels of government), through
constitutional provisions, or by enabling legislation;
• Committed Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by a
government itself, using its highest level of decision-making authority; to be
reported as committed, amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the
government takes the same highest level action to remove or change the constraint;
• Assigned Fund Balance – amounts a government intends to use for a specific
purpose; intent can be expressed by the governing body or by an official or body to
which the governing body delegates the authority; residual amounts in
governmental funds other than the general fund; appropriation of existing fund
balance;
• Unassigned Fund Balance – amounts that are available for any purpose; positive
amounts are only reported in the general fund.
III. Committed Fund Balance Policy
The City Council is the City’s highest level of decision-making authority and the formal action
that is required to be taken to establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance commitment is a
motion approved by the City Council. The resolution must either be approved or rescinded,
as applicable, prior to the last day of the fiscal year for which the commitment is made. The
amount subject to the constraint may be determined in the subsequent period.
IV. Assigned Fund Balance Policy
The City Council has authorized the Finance Director as the official authorized to assign fund
balance to a specific purpose as approved by this fund balance policy.
V. Minimum Unassigned Fund Balance Policy
The City will attempt to maintain an unassigned General fund balance in the general fund
equal to or greater than 10% of operating expenditures.
VI. Resource Flow Policy
When fund balance resources are available for a specific purpose in more than one
classification, it is the City’s policy to use the most restrictive funds first in the following
order: restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned as they are needed.
VII. Consolidation of Component Unit Year-End Fund Balance
Based on Budget Code in the Code of Virginia under section 15.2-2506 stating, “No money
shall be paid out or become available to be paid out for any contemplated expenditure
unless and until there has first been made an annual, semiannual, quarterly, or monthly
appropriation for such contemplated expenditure by the governing body…”, all
appropriations lapse as of June 30 of each fiscal year. Prior to the completion of the annual
audit, unspent funds remaining in the Component Unit – School Fund shall revert back to
the General Fund. As with all City Funds, these funds may be re-appropriated for the
following year, as approved by City Council.
City of Martinsville, Virginia
Fund Balance Policy
*** ANNOTATED VERSION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ***
I. Purpose
The City Council of the City of Martinsville, Virginia is dedicated to maintaining an appropriate level of fund
balance sufficient to mitigate current and future financial risks and to ensure stable tax rates; and,
therefore, formally establishes this policy for the City’s Fund Balance. This policy also authorizes and directs
the Finance Director to prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund balance as required by
GASB Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions.
II. Components of Fund Balance
Fund balance is the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a governmental fund; it is not to
be confused with cash-on-hand. The following five fund balance classifications describe the relative strength
of the spending constraints placed on the purposes for which the resources can be used:
• Nonspendable Fund Balance – amounts that are not in spendable form (such as inventory, prepaids,
and long-term receivables); or are required to be maintained intact (endowment type funds);
***examples: pre-paid taxes; the value of items held in the inventory at the shop; long-term
loans/notes receivable*** FOR FY12: Inventory: 792,569; Prepaid Items: 3,050; TOTAL: $795,619
• Restricted Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by their providers (such as
grantors, creditors, and higher levels of government), through constitutional provisions, or by
enabling legislation; ***examples: Bonds for School Construction; most grant proceeds; meals
taxes; voter-approved constraints***FOR FY12: No amounts restricted.
• Committed Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by a government itself, using
its highest level of decision-making authority; to be reported as committed, amounts cannot be
used for any other purpose unless the government takes the same highest level action to remove or
change the constraint; ***example: funds committed to the Commonwealth Crossing Business
Center – authorized by an act of City Council; encumbrances for contracts approved by Council***
FOR FY12: CCBC: 1,666,700; PART: 23,700; Housing Choice: 280,062; Cafeteria Fund: 860,250;
School Grants Fund: 23,061; TOTAL: $2,853,773
• Assigned Fund Balance – amounts a government intends to use for a specific purpose; intent can be
expressed by the governing body or by an official or high-level body to which the governing body
delegates the authority; residual amounts in governmental funds other than the general fund;
appropriation of existing fund balance; ***examples: budgeted use of fund balance in order to
balance the budget; mid-year adjustments to budget: unanticipated vehicle replacement; re-
appropriations; purchase order encumbrances. Essentially what is now designated.*** FOR FY12:
Thoroughfare Constr: 154,099; Capital Reserve Fund: 1,239,637; Meals Tax Fund: 9,519,913;
TOTAL: $10,913,649
• Unassigned Fund Balance – amounts that are available for any purpose; positive amounts are only
reported in the general fund. *** serves as a measure of current available resources, and is
essential to mitigate current and future risks*** FOR FY12: $4,151,074
III. Committed Fund Balance Policy
The City Council is the City’s highest level of decision-making authority and the formal action that is required
to be taken to establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance commitment is a motion approved by the City
Council. The resolution must either be approved or rescinded, as applicable, prior to the last day of the
fiscal year for which the commitment is made. The amount subject to the constraint may be determined in
the subsequent period.
IV. Assigned Fund Balance Policy
The City Council has authorized the Finance Director as the official authorized to assign fund balance to a
specific purpose as approved by this fund balance policy.
V. Minimum Unassigned Fund Balance Policy
The City will attempt to maintain an unassigned General fund balance in the general fund equal to or greater
than 10% of operating expenditures.
*** 10% has been inserted for discussion purposes. City Council would determine the actual figure to be
inserted here. Based on the year-end FY12 budget, 10% of General Fund operating expenses would be
$2,990,866 (29,908,658 X 10%); 5% = $1,495,483; 15% = $4,486,299; should be no less than one to two
months of regular general fund operating expenditures. Monthly average for FY12 = $2,174,019. FY12’s
$4,151,074 represents 13.88% of General Fund.
VI. Resource Flow Policy
When fund balance resources are available for a specific purpose in more than one classification, it is the
City’s policy to use the most restrictive funds first in the following order: restricted, committed, assigned,
and unassigned as they are needed.
VII. Consolidation of Component Unit Year-End Fund Balance
Based on Budget Code in the Code of Virginia under section 15.2-2506 stating, “No money shall be paid out
or become available to be paid out for any contemplated expenditure unless and until there has first been
made an annual, semiannual, quarterly, or monthly appropriation for such contemplated expenditure by the
governing body…”, all appropriations lapse as of June 30 of each fiscal year. Prior to the completion of the
annual audit, unspent funds remaining in the Component Unit – School Fund shall revert back to the General
Fund. As with all City Funds, these funds may be re-appropriated for the following year, as approved by City
Council.
*** These funds have not been reverting back to the City general fund for years and the School has not
exceeded spending of the annual appropriations; the result is the fund balance is growing. Under 15.2-
2506, the School’s operating fund balance should be essentially reverted back to the City at the end of
each fiscal year. City Council could establish a balance to remain designated specifically for the School‘s
fund balance, such as $250,000 for future school expenditures, or could automatically re-appropriate an
established amount each year.
Fund Balance Summary
Total Funds, exclusive of Utilities: Total by Category:
Non-spendable: 795,619
Inventory 792,569
Prepaid Items 3,050
Restricted: 0
(none)
Committed to: 2,853,773
CCBC 1,666,700
PART 23,700
Housing Choice 280,062
Cafeteria Fund 860,250
School Grants Fund 23,061
Assigned to: 10,913,649
Thoroughfare Constr 154,099
Capital Reserve Fund 1,239,637
Meals Tax Fund 9,519,913
Unassigned: 4,151,074 4,151,074
Totals: 18,714,115 18,714,115
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 9.
Department: Finance
Issue: Hear finance report.
Summary: Finance Director Linda Conover will distribute finance report
details electronically prior to Council meeting.
Attachments: None
Recommendations: Motion to approve.
City Council
Agenda Summary
Meeting Date: December 11, 2012
Item No: 10.
Department: Finance
Issue: Consider approval of consent agenda.
Summary:
The attachments amend the FY13 Budgets with appropriations in the following
funds:
FY13:
General Fund: $1,500 –Donation
CDBG Fund: $25,350 – Neighborhood Stabilization Program funding
Attachments: Consent Agenda - 12-11-12.xls
Recommendations: Motion to approve
BUDGET ADDITIONS FOR 12/11/12
ORG OBJECT DESCRIPTION DEBIT CREDIT
FY13
General Fund:
01100909 490104 Advance/Recovered Costs 1,500
01211070 501400 Circuit Court - Bonus 1,500
donation agreement with Judge Greer
Total General Fund: 1,500 1,500
CDBG Fund:
47102926 436428 Neighborhood Stabilization Program 25,350
47832379 508250 NSP3 - Land Acquisition 25,000
47832379 505005 NSP3 - Administrative Costs 350
Total CDBG Fund: 25,350 25,350
Get email alerts for Martinsville
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.