Architectural Review Committee Meeting

MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4:00 – 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBER, FEW MEMORIAL HALL OF RECORDS MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA Members Present: Dawson, Finklea, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie, Members Absent: Arellano, Davis Staff Members Present: Senior Planner Ebbs, Recording Secretary Abadilla CALL TO ORDER Chair McKenzie called the meeting to order at 4:03 PM. CONSENT ITEMS Committee Member Jacoubowsky moved to place Items 3 and 6 on the Consent Agenda. Committee Member Latasa seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0-2(Absent Arellano, Davis). Approval of Minutes 1. May 4, 2011 ACTION: Approved the Minutes of May 4, 2011 as submitted. On a motion by Committee Member Jacoubowsky, seconded by Committee Member Latasa, and passed by the by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved the Consent Agenda. AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Dawson, Finklea, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie, NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Arellano, Davis ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None ***End of Consent Agenda*** PUBLIC COMMENTS None. PUBLIC APPEARANCE 2. 71 Via Paraiso; Architectural Review Application 11-094; Applicant Greg Burkhart; Owner Greg Burkhart, Jason and Christy Mehringer; R-1-8 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements (Continued from May 4, 2011). Approve Preliminary Architectural Review for a Two-Story Addition to a Single-Family Dwelling.  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 18, 2011 ACTION: Continued the application for redesign to preserve the view impact. 1. Preservation of the view corridor of the airport. 2. Move the mass to the right of the property. 3. Garage is fine in the present location. 4. Preserve the view as shown in photo that was submitted at the meeting. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions: Senior Planner Ebbs presented the staff report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Applicant: Greg Burkhart, Jason and Christy Mehringer were present. Mr. Burkhart explained the history of the project with regards to water drainage, the grade of the hillside, ridge height and having a hardship. He handed out photos of the view of the project from surrounding neighbor’s lots, All present answered questions regarding the hole left after grading, the first application that expired, the cost of the project, view impacts from the lot, and plate height. Public Comments: Nelson Gomes stated that he would like an improvement to the neighbor’s property but would like to keep his views intact in the process. He suggested that instead of a pitch roof, use a flat roof, or lower and move the project to the right of the lot. He answered a question regarding losing the view of the airport with the proposed addition and stated that he doesn't want to lose the value of his house. Committee Member Comments: There was a discussion regarding the view impact policy and lowering the height elements that block the view of the airport or moving them to the right side of the lot. Committee Member Jacoubowsky stated that a possible solution to the view impacts would be to move the ridge. Committee Member Finklea stated that he likes the project as proposed. Committee Member Latasa stated he likes the entry towers. On a motion by Committee Member Dawson, seconded by Committee Member Jacoubowsky, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee continued the application to redesign to preserve the view impacts. AYES: 4 MEMBERS: Dawson, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie NOES: 1 MEMBERS: Finklea ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Arellano, Davis ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None 3. 815 Cass Street; Sign Permit Application 11-032; Applicant Thomas M. Carr of Signworks for Tuesta DMD, Inc.; Owner Tom Minnis; C-O Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements (Continued from May 4, 2011). Request for Retroactive Approval of a Sign Permit for an 8.5 square-foot wall sign and alterations to an existing freestanding sign. ACTION: On consent, approved the application and adopted Findings for Decision. 2  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4. 15 Spray Avenue; Architectural Review Application 11-109; Applicant Cynthia L. Spallacy for Stocker & Allaire, Inc.; Owner David MacEwen; R-1-6-D1 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements. Approve Final Architectural Review for a New Single-Family Dwelling. ACTION: Approved the application with the Conditions of Approval and adopted Findings for Decision. Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan prior to occupancy site for review by City staff. The landscape plan shall be consistent with the Del Monte Shores Design Standards and shall utilize drought-tolerant and coastal-appropriate plant types. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions: Senior Planner Ebbs presented the staff report. Applicant: David Stocker and Daniel Piechota were present. Both men explained the project and answered questions regarding cost of the project, the proposed deck, and using models. Public Comments: None. On a motion by Committee Member Dawson, seconded by Committee Member Finklea, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved the application with the Conditions of Approval and adopted Findings for Decision. AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Dawson, Finklea, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie, NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Arellano, Davis ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None 5. 700 Wave Street; Sign Permit Application 11-111; Applicant John C. Turner; Owner Cannery Row Development Venture L.P. / City of Monterey (Public Right-of-Way); CR Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements. Recommend denial of the Sign/Encroachment Permit for the use of a freestanding commercial sign in the public right-of-way. ACTION: Tabled the application per the applicant’s request. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions: Senior Planner Ebbs presented the staff report and answered Committee Members’ questions. On a motion by Committee Member Finklea, seconded by Committee Member Dawson, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee tabled the application per the applicant’s request. AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Dawson, Finklea, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie, NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None 3  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 18, 2011 ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Arellano, Davis ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None 6. 48 Fisherman's Wharf No. 1; Sign Permit Application 11-087; Applicant Chris Arcoleo; Owner City of Monterey; Exempt from CEQA Requirements. Approve a 6.7 square-foot wall sign. ACTION: On consent, approved the application with the Conditions of Approval and adopted Findings for Decision. Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant shall submit a detailed depiction of the sign content prior to installation. The sign design shall exclude any price information. 2. The scope of this approval is limited to the proposed sign. With this approval, a total of three signs are approved on this building: the 12.5 square-foot wall sign, the 6.7 square- foot wall sign (current application) and the 8.8 square-foot freestanding sign. It does not authorize any other existing or proposed element, such as signs, displays, statues, or other element. 3. The approval of this project is conducted in accordance with Chapter 38, Article 25 of the Monterey Municipal Code, which authorizes the Architectural Review Committee to impose Conditions of Approval and obligates the applicant to abide by such Conditions of Approval. Further, each lease on Fisherman’s Wharf No. 1 requires that the tenant abide by all local laws, including Chapter 38, Article 25. As such, any violation of this approval may also constitute a violation of lease and any resulting action described in the lease and available to the City of Monterey, potentially including declaration of a breach of lease. In proceeding with this approval, the applicant acknowledges the imposition of Conditions of Approval, the importance of abiding by them, and any potential ramifications of violation of the approval. 7. 96 Fisherman's Wharf No. 1; Sign Permit Application 11-014; Applicant Merritt Palminteri for Benji Shake; Owner City of Monterey; Exempt from CEQA Requirements (Continued from May 4, 2011). Sign Permit Application for New Business Signs. ACTION: Continued application per applicant’s request to the June 15, 2011 ARC meeting. On a motion by Committee Member Jacoubowsky, seconded by Committee Member Finklea, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee continued application per applicant’s request to the June 15, 2011 ARC meeting. AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Dawson, Finklea, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie, NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Arellano, Davis ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None 4  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8. 57 Fisherman's Wharf No. 1; Sign Permit Application 11-116, Architectural Review Application 11-033; Applicant Kevin Phillips; Owner City of Monterey; Exempt from CEQA Requirements. Approve Architectural Review and Sign Application for Exterior Alterations and New Projecting Signs. ACTION: Approved Preliminary Architectural Review with the Condition of Approval and adopted Findings for Decision. Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant shall submit a complete application for Final Architectural Review. This application shall reflect the following: a. A detailed light schedule shall be included that indicates all existing and proposed light fixtures and provides photographs and/or cut sheets of each proposed fixture. All light fixtures shall be screened to prevent glare or overspill. b. A paint schedule shall be provided for the entire building. The applicant is encouraged to use a different, but complementary, paint scheme for the Fish and Chips Café. The paint schedule shall include the rear of the building, which shall be painted to match the front of the building. The applicant shall true paint samples on 8.5”x11” cards. c. Unless approved in writing from the Housing and Property Manager, the outdoor seating design shall be modified such that it is not permanently attached to the Wharf surface. d. Photographs and/or details and/or cut sheets shall be provided of the decorative winch and faux loft door hardware. The door hardware should be decorative and appropriately scaled to the door, as if it were functional. 2. This approval shall be valid for a period of 180 days. If a submittal for Final Architectural Review is not provided within this period, this approval shall be invalid. 3. The applicant may not proceed with any aspect of this project until Final Architectural Review approval is received. 4. The approval of this project is conducted in accordance with Chapter 38, Article 25 of the Monterey Municipal Code, which authorizes the Architectural Review Committee to impose Conditions of Approval and obligates the applicant to abide by such Conditions of Approval. Further, each lease on Fisherman’s Wharf No. 1 requires that the tenant abide by all local laws, including Chapter 38, Article 25. As such, any violation of this approval may also constitute a violation of lease and any resulting action described in the lease and available to the City of Monterey, potentially including declaration of a breach of lease. In proceeding with this approval, the applicant acknowledges the imposition of Conditions of Approval, the importance of abiding by them, and any potential ramifications of violation of the approval. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions: Senior Planner Ebbs presented the staff report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Applicant: Kevin Phillips and Jim Gilbert were present. Mr. Phillips handed out a paint sample of the proposed teal color and explained the project with regards to the color, hardware and the corrugated metal. Both men answered questions regarding the lighting, the awnings and obtaining approval at the present meeting. Public Comments: None. 5 Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 18, 2011 Committee Member Comments: Committee Member Jacoubowsky stated that the two businesses should be separated by two different colors of the teal to contrast both businesses. On a motion by Committee Member Finklea, seconded by Committee Member Latasa, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved Preliminary Architectural Review with the Conditions of Approval and adopted Findings for Decision. AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Dawson, Finklea, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie, NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Arellano, Davis ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None ACTION: Continued the sign application to the June 1, 2011 meeting for redesign. 1. The boat may be made out of aluminum. 2. The applicant shall submit cut sheets of the sign lighting. 3. The applicant shall submit a detail of the boat and fin signs. 4. The projecting sign shall be made out of sign foam or sandblasted redwood/cedar. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions: Senior Planner Ebbs presented the staff report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Applicant: Kevin Phillips explained the project with regards of the proposed boat image and lights. Public Comments: None. Committee Member Comments: A discussion took place regarding the material for the proposed boat sign and the type of lights that could be installed. On a motion by Committee Member Dawson, seconded by Committee Member Jacoubowsky, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee continued the sign application to the June 1, 2011 meeting for redesign. AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Dawson, Finklea, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, McKenzie, NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Arellano, Davis ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Committee Member Dawson announced that Art in the Adobes will be coming in October for people to tour adobes that have not been previously opened to the public. Committee Member Latasa asked for the decision made by the Planning Commission on the appeal of paint colors at 96 Fisherman’s Wharf No.1. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS None. 6 Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 18, 2011 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6.10 PM. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, Forrest Ebbs Chair ARC Planner Architectural Review Committee 7