Architectural Review Committee Meeting

Name: Architectural Review Committee Meeting — Monterey, CA
Start: 2019-10-02T16:00:00
End: 2019-10-02T18:00:00
Location: Monterey, CA

Regular Meeting

Monterey, CA · October 2, 2019

Agenda Minutes Packet

Minutes

DocuSign Envelope ID: B5DEAFCC-BC02-4001-83D8-446D62FAA7FB MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFTERNOON SESSION ONLY Wednesday, October 2, 2019 4:00 PM – 7:00 PM 580 PACIFIC STREET, COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA Members Present: Rath, Carter, Bluth, Conner, Hunter, Tregenza Members Absent: None Staff Members Present: Principal Planner Flower, Associate Planner Sabdo, Administrative Assistant Salameh 1. Meeting Procedures CALL TO ORDER Chair Rath called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. CONSENT ITEMS Approval of Minutes 2. June 5, 2019 Action: Approved as submitted. On a motion by Vice Chair Carter, seconded by Committee Member Conner, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved the June 5, 2019 minutes as submitted. AYES: 3 MEMBERS: Rath, Carter, Conner NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 3 MEMBERS: Bluth, Hunter, Tregenza RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None PUBLIC COMMENTS None. PUBLIC APPEARANCE 3. Approve 222 Via Del Rey; Architectural Review Permit ARP-19-0230 for Demolition of a Kitchen-Dinette and Construction of a First and Second-Story Addition to an Existing Single Family Dwelling; Applicant Adam Jeselnick, AIA; Owners Steve and Betsy Wilson; R-1-15 Zoning District; Low Density Residential General Plan Designation; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 Action: Approved 222 Via Del Rey; Architectural Review Permit ARP-19-0230 for demolition of a kitchen-dinette and construction of a first and second-story addition to an existing single family dwelling with staff-recommended conditions of approval. DocuSign Envelope ID: B5DEAFCC-BC02-4001-83D8-446D62FAA7FB Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, June 19, 2019 Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions Associate Planner Sabdo presented the Agenda Report and took Committee Members’ questions. Committee Members asked questions regarding exterior lighting requirements, privacy and views from a proposed second floor window, and the proposed roofline, to which Ms. Sabdo responded. Applicant Adam Jeselnick gave a brief overview of the project and the homeowners’ desire to add on to the home so they could thrive at their residence. He said that they had lived there for several years and hoped to continue to improve their home and grow in the space. He noted that the Wilsons would prefer to maintain clear windows on the second floor rather than glazing them. He also addressed setbacks and mitigation measures taken for the second story addition. Betsy Wilson spoke about the improvements she and her husband had undertaken at the subject site and said that this addition would allow her husband to maintain his job at home and allow their children ample room to play and garden in the backyard. Committee Member Conner asked Ms. Wilson if extending the home along the first floor had ever been considered and Ms. Wilson replied that it had not, due to the steep slopes in the backyard. Public Comments Robert Ashmore, neighbor to the east, raised concerns regarding the setback listed in the staff report and said that he felt he would lose privacy, sunlight, and views due to the proposed addition. He said that he felt the second story would loom over his patio area and that he would be unable to see trees from his kitchen. He said that he took no issue with an addition to the home, but asked that the applicant consider a single story addition in order to preserve views and privacy. Ms. Sabdo clarified that the setback listed on the plan set was an error and confirmed that the correct setback met design guidelines. She also answered questions regarding the rear yard slope and alternative addition locations. Chair Rath asked Ms. Wilson if she had considered a single story addition and Ms. Wilson said that she felt it would be infeasible, as her family valued the quality of life their current yard provided. Kent Knoll spoke in support of the project, noting that he had extensive experience designing and building on the Monterey Peninsula and that the ARC should recognize property owners’ right to build. He added that this particular project met all design criteria and was a modest addition. Committee Member Comments Committee Member Tregenza said that he empathized with Mr. Ashmore and his concerns regarding view loss, but that he agreed with staff and Mr. Knoll that the applicant was well within their rights to this addition. Committee Member Bluth agreed with Committee Member Tregenza and said that while he appreciated the issues raised by Mr. Ashmore, he felt it was appropriate for the family to add on to their home in order to improve upon their lifestyle, as the proposed project was within guidelines. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: B5DEAFCC-BC02-4001-83D8-446D62FAA7FB Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, June 19, 2019 Vice Chair Carter and Committee Member Conner agreed with previous comments by Committee Members Bluth and Tregenza. Chair Rath agreed with fellow Committee Members and said that the project met design guidelines and that the project was an overall good design. On a motion by Committee Member Carter, seconded by Committee Member Bluth, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved 222 Via Del Rey; Architectural Review Permit ARP-19-0230 for demolition of a kitchen-dinette and construction of a first and second-story addition to an existing single family dwelling with staff-recommended conditions of approval. AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Rath, Carter, Conner, Bluth, Tregenza NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 1 MEMBERS: Hunter 5. Approve 1 Ave Maria Road; Architectural Review Permit ARP-19-0284 for Demolition of the Existing Garage and Covered Deck and Construction of a First and Second Addition to an Existing Single Family Dwelling; Applicant Kent Knoll; Owner Daniela Bryan; R-1-15 Zoning District; Low Density Residential General Plan Designation; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 Action: Approved 1 Ave Maria Road; Architectural Review Permit ARP-19-0284 for demolition of the existing garage and covered deck and construction of a first and second addition to an existing single family dwelling with staff recommended conditions of approval and an additional condition that a tree removal permit should be obtained for onsite oak trees, should they require removal. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions Associate Planner Sabdo presented the Agenda Report and took Committee Members’ questions. Committee Member Hunter asked if trees viewed during the ARC field trip would require removal permits and Ms. Sabdo clarified that the ARC would need to include a condition in their motion for a tree removal permit. Applicant Kent Knoll addressed the trees onsite and said that if a removal permit was required, he would be delighted to oblige. He spoke about the property owner’s dedication to preserving the giant redwood that grew near the proposed addition. He also addressed the design of the addition and how it would complement and improve the existing structure. Public Comments None. Committee Member Comments Committee Member Bluth commended the project and said he felt it would improve the home and neighborhood. 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: B5DEAFCC-BC02-4001-83D8-446D62FAA7FB Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, June 19, 2019 Committee Member Tregenza concurred and added that he appreciated the homeowner’s efforts to save the redwood. Committee Member Hunter complimented the homeowner’s efforts in maintaining the look and feel of the neighborhood, as well as their dedication to maintaining the onsite trees. Committee Member Conner agreed with committee Member Hunter. Chair Rath said that the design was incredible, especially in dealing with the rear slope of the property. On a motion by Committee Member Rath, seconded by Committee Member Hunter, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved the application as submitted with staff recommended conditions of approval and an additional condition that a tree removal permit should be obtained for onsite oak trees, should they require removal. AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Carter, Rath, Bluth, Conner, Hunter, Tregenza NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Rath thanked Ms. Sabdo for her reports and congratulated her on completing her first ARC meeting. Committee Member Hunter noted October is Cyber Security Awareness Month. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Flower said that Ms. Sabdo would be working on a future presentation for the ARC on why certain projects require ARC review. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, Ande Flower, AICP Chair Principal Planner Architectural Review Committee 4

Agenda

Architectural Review Committee Agenda Committee Members Architectural Review Committee Linda Rath, Chair Zoe Carter, Vice Chair Meeting Robert Bluth Shannon Conner Wednesday, October 2, 2019 Edward Hunter Council Chamber Patrick Tregenza 580 Pacific Street 4:00 PM Monterey, California FIELD TRIP The Architectural Review Committee will conduct a field trip on September 30, 2019 to review the October 2, 2019 ARC meeting agenda. The field trip will depart from the lawn behind Colton Hall at 4:00 p.m. For more information, call (831) 646-3885. Date Posted: September 27, 2019 ***Afternoon Session Agenda*** 4:00 - 5:30 p.m. 1. Meeting Procedures CALL TO ORDER CONSENT ITEMS CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on consent or recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items consist of those items which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been prepared. A member of the public or a Committee Member may request that an item recommended for approval on consent be heard on the regular agenda for further discussion. Approval of Minutes 2. June 5, 2019 ***End of Consent Agenda*** PUBLIC COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Architectural Review Committee and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the Committee may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to the Committee, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during the afternoon session and continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session, but not both. PUBLIC APPEARANCE PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might stimulate public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings. You are welcome to offer your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time allocated to each speaker. 3. Approve 222 Via Del Rey; Architectural Review Permit ARP-19-0230 for Demolition of a Kitchen-Dinette and Construction of a First and Second-Story Addition to an Existing Single Family Dwelling; Applicant Adam Jeselnick, AIA; Owners Steve and Betsy Wilson; R-1-15 Zoning District; Low Density Residential General Plan Designation; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 4. Approve 1 Ave Maria Road; Architectural Review Permit ARP-19-0284 for Demolition of the Existing Garage and Covered Deck and Construction of a First and Second Addition to an Existing Single Family Dwelling; Applicant Kent Knoll; Owner Daniela Bryan; R-1-15 Zoning District; Low Density Residential General Plan Designation; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS COMMITTEE MEMBERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Committee Member may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of meetings and study sessions. ADJOURNMENT ADJOURNMENT — The general policy of the Architectural Review Committee is that the Afternoon Session will end no later than 5:30 p.m. and the Evening Session will end no later than 11:00 p.m. Any public agenda items that have not been completed within the designated adjournment time may be formally extended by the Committee, or continued to the next regularly scheduled Architectural Review Committee Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting. Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning Office, or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date of the meeting. Members of the public have the right to address the Committee on any Agenda items. The Chair will formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the action on that item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is appreciated. Information distributed to the Committee at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose. Architectural Review Committee decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the decision on forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day falls on a weekend or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the holiday or weekend. An appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning Office at 831-646- 3885. CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES: Voicemail: 831-646-3799 FAX: 831-646-3793 Email: suggest@monterey.org WebPage: http://www.monterey.org Architectural Review Committee 10/2/2019 4:00:00 PM 2 The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646- 3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device. MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885 Architectural Review Committee 10/2/2019 4:00:00 PM 3

Get email alerts for Monterey

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting