CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
Regular MeetingNapa, CA · March 6, 2018
Minutes
955 School Street
CITY OF NAPA Napa, CA 94559
www.cityofnapa.org
MEETING MINUTES - Final
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Jill Techel
Vice Mayor Peter Mott
Councilmember Doris Gentry
Councilmember Jim Krider
Councilmember Scott Sedgley
Tuesday, March 6, 2018 3:30 PM City Hall Council Chambers
3:30 PM Afternoon Session
6:30 PM Evening Session
3:30 P.M. AFTERNOON SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER: 3:38 P.M.
1.A. Roll Call:
Present: 5- Councilmember Gentry, Councilmember Krider, Councilmember Sedgley, Vice
Mayor Mott, and Mayor Techel
2. AGENDA REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS:
City Clerk Roberts announced the following supplemental information copied
after packet distribution:
Items 5A and 6A: PowerPoint Presentations.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
James Hinton, resident, asked several questions concerning the proposed
Civic Center project. Mayor Techel stated the City Council would be
discussing that issue at their upcoming Workshop on Friday.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approval of the Consent Agenda
A motion was made by Councilmember Krider, seconded by Councilmember
Sedgley, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following
vote:
Aye: 5- Gentry, Krider, Sedgley, Mott, and Techel
4.A. 1294-2018 City Council Meeting Minutes
Approved the February 20, 2018 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes.
CITY OF NAPA Page 1 Printed on 3/21/2018
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - Final March 6, 2018
4.B. 1228-2017 State Grant to the City for the Law Enforcement Specialized Units
Program.
Adopted Resolution R2018-022 authorizing acceptance of a Law Enforcement
Specialized Units Program Grant from the California Office of Emergency
Services, in the amount of $203,143 with a local match from the City of $67,714,
and authorizing a budget appropriation in the amount of $270,857, to fund
services provided to survivors of domestic violence and their children.
Enactment No: R2018-022
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
5.A. 1290-2018 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Second Quarter Report
Brian Cochran, Finance Director, provided details on the Second Quarter
Report for 2017/18, which included the financial status report and investment
status report.
Desiree Brun, Deputy City Manager, discussed the Disaster Recovery Update
including the Earthquake Project Update, the 2017 Winter Storms Update and
the 2017 Wildfire update. She reviewed the sixteen project tracking status
projects for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, the Capital Project Status Report, and the
Citizen Relationship Management Report.
Discussion and questions ensued.
Vice Mayor Mott asked about the Dwight Murray Plaza Project. John Ferons,
Senior Civil Engineer, stated staff would meet with the Downtown Business
Association and interested stakeholders to discuss the project. He explained
estimates for the project exceeded the budget; therefore, staff would be
considering taking a phased approach.
Mr. Ferons then provided information regarding the Senior Center project.
City Manager Parness stated staff would come back to Council to determine if
there was an interest in contributing more funding for the Senior Center Project.
It was noted that the Senior Center should be tracked as a project.
Further discussion ensued. In response to a question by Councilmember
Sedgley, Community Development Director Tooker stated Accessory Dwelling
Units would be discussed at the April meeting.
In response to a question by Councilmember Sedgley, Parks and Recreation
Director Coates stated staff is finalizing terms for a Joint Use Agreement with
Napa Valley Unified School District.
In response to a question by Councilmember Sedgley, Joy Eldridge, Water
Manager, commented on dredging at the reservoir.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Mott, seconded by Councilmember Gentry, to
receive and file all reports. The motion carried by the following vote:
CITY OF NAPA Page 2 Printed on 3/21/2018
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - Final March 6, 2018
Aye: 5- Gentry, Krider, Sedgley, Mott, and Techel
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/APPEALS:
6.A. 1301-2018 Request from the League of California Cities for Opinions Related to
Statewide Ballot Measures
Heather Maloney, Administrative Services Manager for Public Works, introduced
Nancy Hall Bennett, Regional Public Affairs Manager, North Bay Division,
League of California Cities.
Ms. Bennett provided a presentation on the League Structure, Strategic Goals,
and an update on June Ballot Measures. She stated two Resolutions were
before City Council for their consideration to support of Proposition 68 and 69.
She explained if voters approve Proposition 68, local governments will receive
funding for local park improvements and will be eligible for grants to fund water,
local parks and climate and coastal resiliency projects. Proposition 69 would
extend the constitutional protections to the new revenues generated by SB 1
that were not currently protected.
Mayor Techel called for public comment.
James Hinton, resident, stated gas tax hurts working people adding he felt there
would be sufficient signatures for a November Ballot Measure to repeal SB1. He
also mentioned Proposition 13 Local Communities Funding Act
There were no further requests to speak.
Vice Mayor Mott moved to close the public hearing, Councilmember
Sedgley seconded. The Motion was unanimously carried.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Mott, seconded by Councilmember Sedgley,
to
(1) Adopt Resolution R2018-023 supporting Proposition 68, the California Drought,
Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018,
on the ballot for the election of June 5, 2018; and
(2) Adopt Resolution R2018-024 supporting Proposition 69, which would authorize
the implementation of Senate Bill 1 (the Road Repair and Accountability Act of
2017), on the ballot for the election of June 5, 2018; and (b) opposing the
proposed ballot measure (Attorney General #17-0033) that would repeal recently
enacted road repair and transportation funding by repealing revenues dedicated
for those purposes, proposed to be on the ballot for the election of November 6,
2018. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5- Gentry, Krider, Sedgley, Mott, and Techel
Enactment No: R2018-023 R2018-024
CITY OF NAPA Page 3 Printed on 3/21/2018
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - Final March 6, 2018
7. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER:
Councilmember Sedgley announced Fire Station 5 opened yesterday and
asked if a Dedication Plaque could be placed at the Station.
Vice Mayor Mott stated he recently returned from a visit to Napa’s Sister
City Launceston Tasmania. He stated he received a warm welcome and
there was genuine concern from the Council and interest in learning more
about how the City of Napa responds to disasters. He asked that a letter
be prepared from the Mayor to thank them and formally invite the
Launceston Councilmembers to the City of Napa.
City Attorney Barrett read the closed session item into the record.
8. CLOSED SESSION:
8.A. 1307-2018
CITY COUNCIL RECESS 4:29 P.M.
6:30 P.M. EVENING SESSION
9. CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 P.M.
9.A. Roll Call:
Present: 5- Councilmember Gentry, Councilmember Krider, Councilmember Sedgley, Vice
Mayor Mott, and Mayor Techel
10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
11. AGENDA REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS:
City Clerk Roberts announced the following supplemental information that was
copied after packet distribution:
Items 14 A and 14 B: PowerPoint Presentations
12. REPORT ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION:
No reportable action.
CITY OF NAPA Page 4 Printed on 3/21/2018
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - Final March 6, 2018
13. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Andrew Killeen, the new Director for the Solano Napa Habitat for Humanity,
along with members of his staff, urged Council and interested residents
and to join them on Build Days on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays.
Jennie Olson, resident, stated she would not be available to speak when
Item 14B would be heard, but asked that City Council consider not
reducing the separation standard for the Medicinal and Adult Use
Cannabis Ordinance from 1000 feet to 600 feet.
James Hinton, resident, voiced opposition to any use of Roundup in the
City and urged adoption of a Resolution similar to one that Richmond
adopted concerning the use of the pesticide.
14. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
14.A. 1259-2018 Downtown Napa Business and Construction Update for 2017
Robin Klingbeil, Sr Development Project Coordinator, presented the
Downtown Napa Activity Report for 2017.
There were no comments from the public.
Brief Council comments and questions ensued.
Receive presentation regarding 2017 business and construction activity in
Downtown Napa.
CITY OF NAPA Page 5 Printed on 3/21/2018
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - Final March 6, 2018
14.B. 1293-2018 Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Ordinance
Indexes: cannabis
Rick Tooker, Community Development Director, provided the status report to
City Council regarding the implementation of the Medicinal and Adult-Use
Cannabis Ordinance. He stated staff seeks further clarification and direction
from City Council regarding separation standards, impenetrable barriers, and
setback standards.
Mayor Techel called for Public Comment.
Tim Thulin, resident, stated he did not see the logic of changing the distance
separation standards to 600 feet.
Patrick Wilson, President of Napa Police Officers Association, asked that
expanded zoning not be approved at this time, and cited several criminal
incidents in locations around the state involving marijuana.
Barbara Reisman, MD, and voiced concern regarding negative impacts from
marijuana use on young people and urged no changes to the ordinance.
Blake Walker, local business owner, rebutted previous comments and noted
the widespread access to alcohol, which has no medicinal benefits.
James Hinton, resident, stated safe access was needed to residents.
Chad Williams, owner of property at 1144 Jordan Lane location of the former
Joy Luck House Restaurant, stated his property has been identified as a prime
location for a medicinal cannabis dispensary; however, they needed more
clarity on the definition of “youth center” before they move forward with their
application.
Alicia Rose Kelly, business owner, stated she maintained respect for the 1000
distance requirement but requested additional clarification to the definition of
impenetrable barriers, requested Kennedy Park Golf Course be separated from
Kennedy Park, and commented on the 200 ft. setback guideline interpretation.
Anne Steinhauer, on behalf of her clients, the Napa Valley Cannabis
Association, thanked City Council for their possible consideration of reducing
the separation standard, asked that the Napa River be included as an
impenetrable barrier, and stated the 200-ft. street setback is about safety not
limiting access.
Lowell Downey, resident, commented on opioid epidemic and stated cannabis
helps manage chronic pain.
Micah Malan, resident, stated the restrictions inside the zones created make it
very difficult to find the proper location. He stated six dispensaries should be
opened to serve Napa County.
CITY OF NAPA Page 6 Printed on 3/21/2018
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - Final March 6, 2018
Sara Sitch, Director Community Programs Napa County Office of Education,
voiced opposition to reducing any zoning requirements.
Kelly Schafer, resident,stated separation standards were too restrictive and
asked Council to reduce them.
Mayor Techel called for further public comment; there were no requests to
speak.
Council discussion and comments ensued.
Councilmember Krider stated he approved reducing the separation standard for
distance and stated it should be measured by path of travel; he suggested the
street setback could be approved by a variance or an approval process through
the Police Department.
Councilmember Sedgley agreed the distance measurement should be
measured by path of travel as well as having a separate process for the 200
feet setback. He stated he believed in local businesses and local hires.
Councilmember Gentry also agreed that the Police Department or Planning
Division could review specific locations for street setbacks, and stated the
separation standard should be changed to 600 ft. She suggested that Kennedy
Park be classified as a golf course and not a park.
Vice Mayor Mott stated if a person cannot get to the dispensary, it should not
count toward DISTANCE. He stated he was still torn on the separation
standard; and proceeded to ask Mr. Tooker clarifying questions on the state
standards and signage requirements.
Mayor Techel stated she appreciated the report and heard the concern for safe
access. She clarified that a medicinal cannabis dispensary in the City of Napa
would not receive sales tax, it is instead a service to the community. She stated
she was not in favor of reducing the separation standard to 600 ft. at this time.
Discussion ensued regarding the direction to staff. Councilmember Sedgley
stated he felt there was an agreement on the impenetrable barriers, and a
process to rely on staff and police recommendation on the 200 ft. street setback
requirements, it was the 1000 ft separation that was still under consideration.
Councilmember Sedgley asked if the Council could get to a consensus on the
1000 ft “path of travel”.
Mayor Techel turned to Community Development Director Tooker, who deferred
to City Attorney Barrett on the issue of the state law requirements. City Attorney
Barrett stated state law requires that the 600 feet distance requirement is based
on a straight line between properties.
Discussion ensued regarding state law separation standard requirements.
Councilmember Krider stated he did not want to go outside of state law.
Councilmember Sedgley agreed that Council should align with the state
requirements and the direction to staff should be to identify barriers, identify
CITY OF NAPA Page 7 Printed on 3/21/2018
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - Final March 6, 2018
criteria with visibility, and move the radius to 600 ft.
Further discussion ensued regarding properties, annual reviews, and the
definition of youth serving businesses. Vice Mayor Mott cautioned that Council
should not dilute the definition of youth serving businesses. Director Tooker
stated that youth services are defined in state law.
Mayor Techel stated for the record she was not in favor of reducing the
separation standard to 600 feet.
In response to the question, Mr. Tooker stated he felt he had sufficient direction
from Council to draft revisions reducing the separation standard to 600 feet,
identify additional impenetrable barriers, identify objective criteria in for the
maximum 200 feet setback from the street. Mr. Tooker confirmed that the
revised ordinance would go to the Planning Commission first and then to City
Council.
Receive a status report regarding the implementation of the Medicinal and
Adult-Use Cannabis Ordinance, and provide direction to staff relating to possible
revisions to the ordinance.
15. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER:
Councilmember Krider commented on the recent passing of Napa County
Supervisor Harold Moskowite. Mayor Techel adjourned the meeting in
memory of Mr. Moskowite at 8:25 p.m.
16. ADJOURNMENT: 825 P.M.
Submitted by:
_______________________________
Dorothy Roberts, City Clerk
CITY OF NAPA Page 8 Printed on 3/21/2018
Agenda
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
3:30 PM Afternoon Session
6:30 PM Evening Session
City Hall Council Chambers
955 School Street
Napa, CA 94559
www.cityofnapa.org
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Jill Techel
Vice Mayor Peter Mott
Councilmember Doris Gentry
Councilmember Jim Krider
Councilmember Scott Sedgley
See last pages of agenda for information regarding meeting procedures
Vea las últimas páginas de esta agenda para información sobre juntas del poder legislativo
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 6, 2018
3:30 P.M. AFTERNOON SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER:
1.A. Roll Call:
2. AGENDA REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS:
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.A. 1294-2018 City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommendation: Approve the February 20, 2018 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes.
Attachments: ATCH 1 - Regular Meeting Minutes DRAFT
4.B. 1228-2017 State Grant to the City for the Law Enforcement Specialized
Units Program.
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing acceptance of a Law Enforcement
Specialized Units Program Grant from the California Office of
Emergency Services, in the amount of $203,143 with a local match from
the City of $67,714, and authorizing a budget appropriation in the amount
of $270,857, to fund services provided to survivors of domestic violence
and their children.
Attachments: ATCH 1 - Resolution
ATCH 2 - LESU Grant Approval Letter
Page 2 of 6 Printed on 3/1/2018
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 6, 2018
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
5.A. 1290-2018 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Second Quarter Report
Recommendation: Receive and file the Second Quarter Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18.
Attachments: ATTCH 1 - 2nd Quarter Report
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/APPEALS:
6.A. 1301-2018 Request from the League of California Cities for Opinions
Related to Statewide Ballot Measures
Recommendation: (1) Adopt a resolution supporting Proposition 68, the California Drought,
Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All
Act of 2018, on the ballot for the election of June 5, 2018.
(2) Adopt a resolution (a) supporting Proposition 69, which would
authorize the implementation of Senate Bill 1 (the Road Repair and
Accountability Act of 2017), on the ballot for the election of June 5, 2018;
and (b) opposing the proposed ballot measure (Attorney General
#17-0033) that would repeal recently enacted road repair and
transportation funding by repealing revenues dedicated for those
purposes, proposed to be on the ballot for the election of November 6,
2018.
Attachments: ATCH 1 - Resolution Prop 68
ATCH 2 - Resolution Prop 69
ATCH 3 - SB 1 Myth vs Facts
ATCH 4 - SB 5 Funding Breakdown
7. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER:
8. CLOSED SESSION:
8.A. 1307-2018 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government
Code Section 54957.6) City designated representatives:
Mike Parness, Michael Barrett and Desiree Brun. Employee
organization: Police Management Unit (PMU) and
Unrepresented employee: Police Chief.
CITY COUNCIL RECESS
6:30 P.M. EVENING SESSION
9. CALL TO ORDER:
9.A. Roll Call:
Page 3 of 6 Printed on 3/1/2018
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 6, 2018
10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
11. AGENDA REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS:
12. REPORT ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION:
13. PUBLIC COMMENT:
14. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
14.A. 1259-2018 Downtown Napa Business and Construction Update for
2017
Recommendation: Receive presentation regarding 2017 business and construction activity
in Downtown Napa.
Attachments: ATCH 1 - Business Activity Chart
ATCH 2 - Investment Chart
14.B. 1293-2018 Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Ordinance
Recommendation: Receive a status report regarding the implementation of the Medicinal
and Adult-Use Cannabis Ordinance, and provide direction to staff relating
to possible revisions to the ordinance.
Attachments: ATCH 1 - Ordinance 02017-018
ATCH 2 - Holcomb Letter dated February 14, 2018
15. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER:
16. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regularly scheduled meeting for the City Council of the City of Napa is March 20, 2018.
I hereby certify that the agenda for the above stated meeting was posted at a location freely
accessible to members of the public at City Hall, 955 School Street, on Thursday, March 1, 2018
at 5:00 p.m.
_______________________________
Dorothy Roberts, City Clerk
Page 4 of 6 Printed on 3/1/2018
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 6, 2018
MEETING DATES:
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Tuesday of each month; additional meetings may be
scheduled as needed.
INFORMATION AVAILABLE FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS:
Information and documents related to items on this agenda are available on the City ’s website at
www.cityofnapa.org; you may also contact the City Clerk for information by email at clerk@cityofnapa .org; by
calling (707) 257-9503; or in person at 955 School Street, Napa. Any documents related to an agenda item that are
provided to a majority of the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are reported by the City Clerk at the
meeting under “Supplemental Reports and Communications,” and are available for public inspection.
CITY POLICY TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO PUBLIC MEETINGS:
The City of Napa complies with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law,
and does not discriminate against any person with a disability. If any person has a disability and requires
information or materials in an appropriate alternative format (or any other reasonable accommodation), contact the
City Clerk at (707) 257-9503 or email at clerk@cityofnapa.org. For TTY/ Speech-to-Speech users, dial 7-1-1 for the
California Relay Service, for text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week.
In making any request to the City for assistance, please provide advance notice of at least three business days
prior to the meeting.
TRADUCCIONES EN ESPAÑOL / SPANISH-LANGUAGE TRANSLATIONS:
Esta agenda identifica los asuntos que serán considerados en una junta del poder legislativo. Todas las juntas del
poder legislativo están abiertas al público, y se invita a los miembros del público a asistir y dirigirse directamente
ante el poder legislativo. Si usted desea recibir una copia de esta agenda o informaci ón relacionada en español, por
favor póngase en contacto con la Secretaria de la Ciudad al 707-257-9503 o por correo electrónico a
Clerk@cityofnapa.org.
CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS:
Meetings are conducted in accordance with the requirements of state law (the “Ralph M. Brown Act,” California
Government Code Sections 54950, et seq.) and the City’s Rules of Order (Council Policy Resolution 19).
Members of the public may address the Council at designated times and are expected to conduct themselves with
courtesy and respect. Speakers should direct comments to the Mayor and City Councilmembers, not the audience .
Speakers are expected to yield the floor when the time limit is identified and comply with the City ’s Rules of Order.
Speaking times are limited to no more than three minutes per person, with the exception of certain hearings and
appeals, or at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT (INCLUDING CONSENT CALENDAR AND ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS):
The public may directly address the City Council on any subject within the Council ’s subject matter jurisdiction,
including any matter that is not on the agenda. Speaking time is limited to no more than three (3) minutes per
person, unless modified at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council.
If the matter is not on the agenda, or if the matter is on the Consent Calendar, or is an Administrative Report,
submit a speaker card or request to speak during the Public Comment portion of the meeting.
Speaker cards are not required if the speaker otherwise makes a clear and timely request to address the Council,
but do promote the efficient and orderly progress of the meeting. Information on Speaker Cards is subject to
disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
These items are considered routine and may be approved by a single vote. Only the Mayor or a majority of the City
Page 5 of 6 Printed on 3/1/2018
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 6, 2018
Council may authorize public input after the consent calendar is introduced.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Only the Mayor or a majority of the City Council may authorize public input after an administrative report item is
introduced.
CONSENT HEARINGS:
These items are considered routine and may be approved by a single vote; however, any member of the public or
City Council may remove an item for consideration during the public hearing portion of the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS/APPEALS
During any public hearing or appeal, any person may directly address the City Council. Applicants (or appellants)
are allowed 10 minutes to present testimony at the beginning of the public hearing, and if needed, 5 minutes to
present rebuttal at the end of the public hearing. All other speakers will be limited to 3 minutes.
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council is authorized to meet in closed session, without attendance by the public, on limited
confidential topics such as pending litigation, real property negotiations, or personnel or labor matters.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT:
The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) is the state law that requires the City to evaluate and document
the potential environmental consequences of discretionary decision. (See, California Public Resources Code
Sections 21000 - 21189.3; and the “CEQA Guidelines” at California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6,
Chapter 3, Sections 15000 - 15387). For each item that requires a CEQA determination by City Council, there is a
reference to that determination on this agenda, and more information regarding the CEQA analysis is included in
the documents that accompany this Agenda. To the extent that City staff determines that particular items are not
subject to CEQA, there will be no indication of a CEQA action on this Agenda.
CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
If a person wishes to file a legal challenge to any decision made by the City Council, you may be limited to raising
only those issues which you or someone else raised during the meeting, or in a written communication received by
the City Clerk prior to or during the meeting. In addition, a legal challenge may be limited or barred where the
interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies. The time limit to commence
any legal challenge may be subject to strict timing requirements, and failure to comply with applicable timing
requirements may result in a legal challenge being barred. Any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi -adjudicative
decision made by the City Council is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter
limitation period is specified by any other provision. Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any
quasi-adjudicative decision made by City Council must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on
which such decision becomes final.
Page 6 of 6 Printed on 3/1/2018
Get email alerts for Napa
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.