Planning Commission Meeting

AGENDA PLANNINGCOMMISSION MEETING THURSDAY, Janua 20, 2022 CITY OF VIA ZOOM N (3 R M AN |3‘~r PAR K htt s://us02web.zoom.us/'/87564365107 WASHINGTUN Webinar ID: 375 6436 5107 I. Call to Order — Chair Weller Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance IV. Approval of Agenda Director’s Report a. 1Q 2022 work program: January 25 joint session with City Council b. Introduce Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) as framework for the 2024 Comp Plan major update community engagement process c. Filling unexpired Planning Commission position No. 5 status — VI. Public Comment Submit comments via email with the subject line ‘City of Normandy Park Planning Commission Public Comment’ to nmatz normand arkwa. ov no later than 4:30 p.m. on the Wednesday before the scheduled meeting. All comments received by this time and date will be read aloud during the remote Zoom meeting. VII. New Business - Study Session a. Developing a docket for 2022 Comp Plan annual amendments VIII. Continued Business — Study Session a. City Council—directed work program for policy and code amendment recommendations in regard to the Normandy Park Economic Development Implementation Report. b. City Council—directedwork program for NPMC amendments in regard to E2SHB 1220. IX. Approval of Minutes a. December 9, 2022 Meeting Minutes For questions about meeting minutes, please check audio recordings on the City website media page: htt s://www.normand arkwa. ov/media/ Adjournment  Normandy Park Planning Commission ‘ cm, 0,, Agenda Bill PC21-005 NORMANDY PARK Meeting Date: January 20, 2022 WASHINGTON Agenda Category: Continued Business SUBJECT Type V code amendment work item to comply with state legislation in E2SH B 1220 regarding code provisions for newly-legislated supportive housing types. PRESENTED BY Nicholas Matz AICP, Community Development Director BACKGROUND In 2021 the State Legislature enacted E2SHB 1220 in order to promote affordable housing options in local jurisdictions. The Municipal Research and Services Center (“MRSC”), in a June 29 blog post, noted “Homelessness and affordable housing are two major and difficult issues facing communities throughout the state of Washington. To help address these complicated issues, E2SHB 1220 was meant to encourage code cities to take active steps to accommodate transitional housing, emergency shelters, and similar homelessness—re|ated facilities through local planning and changes to local development regulations.” The legislation requires that transitional and permanent supportive types of housing not be prohibited in any zones in which residential dwelling units or hotels are allowed, and that emergency housing and emergency shelter uses not be prohibited in any zones in which hotels are allowed. Fortunately, the legislation allows for “reasonable occupancy, spacing, and intensity of use requirements [which] may be imposed by ordinance...to protect public health and safety.” What has the City of Normandy Park done to date? After the November 18 meeting study session Planning Commissioners directed staff to bring fonlvard draft proposals for a focus on an interim approach to regulation and regulations which reflect a Normandy Park—specific approach to each of these uses. The draft would also consider proposed Housing policy that clarifies the response proportionate to our size, and with a focus on an exceptionally humane and dignified approach, and which encourages a regional approach. Planning Commissioners continued their discussion at the October 28 meeting regarding the code components of such legislation as applied to Normandy Park, directing staff to . . bring fon/vard draft proposals for interim ordinance, and continuing n regional partnerships, assuring sponsorship organization operating V‘ ; to discuss plans, options for II and trying to . - . get a handle on the numbers that reflectI the problem in south King County. Planning Commissioners held a thoughtful and detailed discussion‘i at your September meeting regarding the City Council’s direction for this work program, and what the I .. . 16 . ‘ Commission believes is necessary to respond to the requirements in the adopted legislation. These requirements in Section 3 of the bill contain the following preemptions of local zoning authority*: o A code city shall notprohibit transitional housing or permanent supportive housing .. in any zones in which residential dwelling units or hotels are allowed... I ‘ ' a code city shall not prohibit indoor emergency shelters I and indoor emergency I . 0 I housing in any zones in which hotels are allowed, except in such cities that have ' adopted an ordinance authorizing indoor emergency shelters and indoor _ emergency housing in a majority of zones within a one-mile proximity to transit; *as described in Maple Valley Ordinance O-21-726 On September 14 the City CouncilII '3. invited StateI Representative Tina Onlvall (D— ' ' . Moines) to discuss recent state legislationv. I Des regarding HB 1477 (implementing Ithe national ‘ ‘ 988 system to enhance and expand behavioral‘I health crisis response and suicide I prevention services) and E2SHB 1220 (supporting emergency shelters I I and housing through local planning and development regulations). Representative II Onlvall noted the ‘ - Legislature’s focus on homelessness this last session, a desire to address a concentration in Seattle of resources for II homelessness, and a willingness to continue to . . . work with constituents on addressing legislative implementation I efforts as theyI impact local jurisdictions. Mayor Sue-Ann Hohimer confirmedI the I intent of the City Council, I after the presentation II I ' . ' and discussion with Representative Orwall, to direct the Planning Commission to begin I: I . : . . - . an NPMC amendment process addressing E2SHB 1220 implementation.I On August 10 the City Council heard a new businessII . agenda item regarding the need to ..I address E2SHB 1220 implementation by local jurisdictions and a request by Community Development for the City Council to direct a code amendment =work Planning Commission to conduct such implementation. After II extensive I program I to the discussion, « City Council deferred any action on the request until Representative Tina Onlvall (D— the II .. ~ ,» available City Council meeting to discuss the Des ; Moines) could be invited to the next II ‘ path by ' ‘ which the legislation was adopted. On July 6 City Councilmembers received background information on the recent state legislation regarding affordability in'| housing, I following a request ' I by- Councilmember in Thompson on the importance of understanding howE. 'H this legislation (ESSB 5235 and E2SHB 1220, adopted July 25) could influence housing supply in Normandy Park. I _ . - I; ANALYSIS and FOCUSED APPROACH The legislation requires that transitional and permanent supportive types of housing not be prohibited in any zones in which residential dwelling units or hotels are allowed, and that emergency housing and emergency shelter uses not be prohibited in any zones in which hotels are allowed. Fortunately, the legislation allows for “reasonable occupancy, spacing, and intensity of use requirements [which] may be imposed by ordinance...to protect public health and safety.” This legislation encourages a thoughtful, broad approach to how and who we house with these types of supportive housing. Normandy Park is a community of predominantly single—familyhomes, while attached housing makes up 30 percent of our housing stock. Communities all over the region are becoming aware of the different ways that households and families form economic units—and now, unfortunately, how those units can dissolve into homelessness. This has meaning for the preservation and addition of housing stock, to keep a community aware of its own vision and future. The draft reflects the “Regulatory Parts” framework that the commission previously set: a A response proportionate to our size (formerly known as “minimally conservative”); o A focus on an exceptionally humane and dignified approach using public health and safety as the cornerstones for planning tools and standards; o Tools and standards regulating the use of housing for these types based on “markets of avai|ability”—or within a market—rateframework; o Regulations that respond to the quality and forms of housing for the households needing accommodation by the legislation; o Understanding what other cities are doing and applying similarity; and o Linking the mandated type allowances with an affordability framework. 1. Housing policy adoption that: Clarifies the response proportionate to our size, and with a focus on an exceptionally humane and dignified approach using public health and safety as the cornerstones for planning tools and standards and which encourages a regional approach. Draft policy: TBD 2. Code amendments for adopting new definitions Summary: The draft proposal will treat each new housing type separately with a definition and regulatory framework, and will recommend an adopting ordinance on an interim basis. Define and regulate as follows: a A code city shall notprohibit transitional housing or permanent supportive housing in any zones in which residential dwelling units or hotels are allowed. 2a. Transitional housing . Definition: means a project that provides housing and supportive services to homeless persons or families for uup to two .- facilitating the movement of homeless persons . years and that has as its purpose and families into independent living. . Regulation: Add a reference to the 'definition of types of households that can occupy dwelling units. in addition, require a business I r; license that links to required standards and a memorandum of agreement (MOA)with the service provider (see below.) 2b. Permanent supportive housing De?nition: is subsidized, leased housing with no limit on length of stay that prioritizes people who need comprehensive support services I H to retain tenancy and utilizes admissions practices designed to use lower barriers H to entry than would be typical for ' other subsidized or unsubsidized rental housing, especially related to rental history, . .. criminal history and personal behaviors. Permanent supportive housing is paired with on-site or off—sitevoluntary services designed to support a person living with a ‘ complex and disabling behavioral health or physical health condition who was experiencing homelessness or was at imminent risk of homelessness priorto moving into housing to retain their housing be a successful tenant in a housing arrangement, . improve the resident's health status, and connect the resident of the housing with . community—based health care, treatment, or employment services. Permanent .1 responsibilities defined in chapter supportive housing is subject to all of the rights H and 59.18 RCW. types of:1 households that can occupy Regulation: Add a reference to the definition of .' dwelling units. In addition, require a CUP that links to required standards and a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with the service provider (see below.) Standards for transitional housing and permanent I- supportive housing: o Permanent ‘I supportive housing and Itransitional housingH facilities are allowed subject to the following criteria: . - It must be a 24-hour-a-day facility where beds or rooms are assigned to specific residents for the duration of their stay. - On-site services such as laundry, hygiene, meals, case management, and social programs are limited to Hthe residents of the facility and not available ‘. for drop—inuse by non-residents. . - The facility must be located within a half mile :;walking distance of a bus or rail transit stop. - Facilities must be at least a one mile from I .. anyu other emergency housing or ’= emergency shelter, calculated as a radius from the property lines of the site. - The maximum number of residentsI in a facility is ulimited to the general capacity of the building but in no case more than 10.  - Buildings must have structure entrances staffed 24/7, with individual units only accessible through interior corridors. - The facility must be ADA compliant. - The facility must not be located within 1,400 feet of an elementary school. a code city shall not prohibit indoor emergency shelters and indoor emergency housing in any zones in which hotels are allowed, except in such cities that have adopted an ordinance authorizing indoor emergency shelters and indoor emergency housing in a majority of zones within a one-mile proximity to transit;. 2c. Emergency shelter and indoor emergency housing — Path B: De?nition: Seek the exception described above. The city’s ordinance adoption of Temporary Homeless Encampment (THE) regulations into NPMC 18.08.200 and NPMC 18.110 includes the legislative intent of E2SHB 1220 in defining indoor emergency shelters and indoor emergency housing and thus meets the legislative intent of not prohibiting indoor emergency shelters and emergency housing. In turn this would not require amending the NPMC to now allow them as separate uses. THE are allowed by right in any zone in the city (provided they are located on property owned by religion organizations) including those zones within one mile of proximity to transit on 15‘Ave S—which is the city’s sole transit corridor with Metro Route 165- subject to standards in NPMC 18.110. Regulation: add the words or shelter to the NPMC 18.08.200 definition, and require standards and a memorandum of agreement (MOA) for THE permitted uses. o NPMC 18.08.200: “Temporary homeless encampment” means a temporary encampment or shelter for homeless persons on property owned or controlled by a religious organization, whether within buildings located on the property or elsewhere on the property outside of buildings. 0 E2SHB 1220 Section 6 (9): "Emergency housing" means temporary indoor accommodations for individuals or families who are homeless or at imminent risk of becoming homeless that is intended to address the basic health. food, clothing, and personal hygiene needs of individuals or families. Emergency housing may or may not require occupants to enter into a lease or an occupancy agreement. 0 E2SHB 1220 Section 6 (10): "Emergency she|ter" means a facility that provides a temporary shelter for individuals or families who are currently homeless. Emergency shelter may not require occupants to enter into a lease or an occupancy agreement. Emergency shelter facilities may include day and warming centers that do not provide overnight accommodations. Standards for [amended] temporary homeless encam pments: - It must be a 24-hour-a-day facility where beds or rooms are assigned to specific residents for the duration of their stay.  . . On-site services such I as laundry, I’ hygiene, meals, case management, and social . programs are limited to the residents of the facility and not available for drop-in use by II non—residents. The II facility must be located v. ' within a half mile walking distance of a bus or rail ‘ ' transit stop. . . Facilities must be at least a 1.5 miles from any other emergency housing or emergency I - . shelter, ,. calculated I as a radius from the property lines of the site. ' .. _ _ The maximum number of residents of the building but in no case more than 10. in a facility is limited to the general capacity Buildings must have structure entrances staffed 24/7, with individual units only accessible through interior corridors. The facility.I must beI ADA compliant. I The facility must not be located within 1,400 feet of an elementary school. Memorandum of agreement for temporary homeless encampmentlshelter, .. permanent supportive housing or transitional housing facilities 0 _ Prior to the start of operation, the City and facility operator shall develop and execute a -MemorandumI: of Agreement containing, I at a minimum, theVI following items: Good Neighbor Agreement ' II addressing the following items: 1. Quiet hours, 2. Smoking areas, 3. Security procedures, . I‘ and 4. Litter, 5. Adequacy I of landscaping “. II and screening I “II of conduct establishing A code I‘ a set of standards I and expectations that residents must agree to follow. A parking plan approved by the city showing that the facility has adequate .. . parking to meet the expected demand from residents, staff, service providers, and visitors. Residents and visitors may not park off-site and all vehicles must be operational. A coordination plan with both the Police and Fire Departments, including ..... . . .. protocols for response to the I. - I and to facility residents throughout the city facility and a maximum ) I4 I‘. number of responses threshold for law enforcement services. lf calls for law enforcement services exceed the agreed upon threshold in any given I quarter, the facilityI operator I will work Iwith the City to reduce calls below the threshold level. - A requirement . .| to provide quarterly reports to the City Manager on how facilities -I are meeting performance metrics such as placement of residents into permanent housing or addiction treatment programs. 2d. Emergency shelter and indoor emergency ‘ ‘ housing I — Path C 2.d.1 Emergency II . Housing I De?nition: means temporary _ indoor I X . accommodations I for individuals or families who I . are homeless or at imminent risk of becoming homeless that is intended to address the basic health, food, clothing, and personal hygiene needs of individuals I I or families. Emergency housingI . may or may not require occupants to enter into a lease or anI occupancy agreement. . Regulation: Allowed in NC subject to CUP with distance exclusion (NPTC is 1400 from 675 Ito - I- . THE but also requiring an MOU and - ‘I like I Marvista) Regulated _ I require standards and an MOU for THE permitted uses. 2.d.2 Emergency II Shelter I De?nition: .' meansH a facility I: that provides a temporary shelter for individuals or " families Iwho are currently homeless. Emergency shelter may not require a - occupants I to enter Iinto a lease or an occupancy I agreement. Emergency ‘ shelter facilities may include day and warming centers that do not provide overnight I accommodations. Regulation: Allowed where THE are allowed, requirements including an MOU and require I I I ..,- with additional specific - I1 and an MOU for THE standards permitted uses. Planning Commissioners asked for I I information on the following topics. Information found to date I is shown in italics: 1 How wouldn Normandy : ' I' Park use an “interim”I‘ ordinance approach to anticipate work on needs capacity that still has to be done by the Department of Commerce? Can the City do an interlocal .II I‘ ' agencies to address this needs capacity? Consistent with other ' with state law at RCW35A.63.230, if an interim ordinance is passed, a public hearing . V will take place within sixtyI days (the public hearing V ' ' . = could occur on the date the ordinance is passed.) City. staff .—.I - will askI City Council to place a review of any interim I. " ordinance on the - Planning - - . . Commission’s 2022 -IWork Program. Please note: E2SHB 1220 speci?cally prohibits the City I II _ from enacting short term moratorium provisions in ROW 36. 70A.390 to prevent supportive housing uses where residential dwelling units or hotels areI allowed. II. Distinguishing ‘ r regulations H forI below—market ' I I I affordable housing and the four EZSHB 1220 types? It is worth discussing how upcoming policy and mandates regarding affordable or below market-rate housing can be addressed within the context of the four E2SHB housing types, since these types are demonstrably in low-income housing categories. 3. How many organizations provide these types of housing and where? Can organizations doing this come talk to us? Staff will be inviting service providers to the February Planning Commission meeting. FISCAL IMPACT There is no direct cost to carrying out a Type V municipal code amendment. The city could see increased costs associated with litigation defending the municipal code without provisions for supportive housing uses. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The Comprehensive Plan's Land Use and Housing Elements provide guidance on housing placement and affordability. The city has a track record of making informed decisions about affordability in housing, including: 0 Adoption of transfer of development rights (TDR) in the Manhattan Village Subarea (2013); o Partnering with other south Sound communities in the South King Housing and Homeless Partners (SKHHP); and o imposing a local sales and use tax for affordable housing (2019) as a result of other recent legislation (SB 1406)—and then in turn entering into an interlocal agreement (2021) with SKHHP to pool this share of the state's sales tax for local provision of affordable housing. o The temporary homeless encampment regulations were adopted in 2016. ATTACHMENTS 1. NPMC Chapter 18.110 Temporary Homeless Encampments  Attachment 1 Chapter 18.110 TEMPORARY HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT Sections: 18.110.010 Purpose. 18.110.020 Application for temporary homeless encampment permit. 18.110.030 Requirements for approval and operation. 18.110.040 Revocation of permit. 18.110.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate homeless encampments within the city of Normandy Park in compliance with the requirements of RCW 3521.915 The standards and requirements in this chapter are the minimum necessary to protect the public health and safety and do not substantially burden the decisions or actions of religious organizations regarding the location of housing or shelter for homeless persons on property owned by such religious organizations. (0rd. 936 § 3, 2016). 18.110.020 Application for temporary homeless encampment permit. (1) A temporary homeless encampment is an allowed use only on property owned or controlled by a religious organization that is acting as either the host agency or the sponsoring agency, or both, for the temporary homeless encampment. (2) An application for a temporary homeless encampment permit shall be submitted to the city manager or his designee on a form approved by the city manager. The application shall contain, at a minimum, all of the following information: (a) The name, address, and telephone number of the host agency, and the telephone number and e-mail address for a designated representative of the host agency; and (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the sponsoring agency, and the telephone number and e-mail address for a designated representative of the sponsoring agency; and (c) The proposed location of the temporary homeless encampment and information as to whether the temporary homeless encampment will be located inside a building or outside a building on property owned or controlled by the host agency; and  (d) The date on which temporary homeless encampment is proposed to move onto the proposed location and the date on which the temporary homeless encampment is proposed to vacate the proposed location; and (e) The maximum number of residents proposed; and (f) A site plan showing the proposed location of the facilities required by NPMC 18.110.030 ; and (g) A statement demonstrating how the temporary homeless encampment will meet the requirements of NPMC 18.110.030 T i (3) The application for a temporary homeless encampment permit must be accompanied by an application fee established by resolution of the city council. The application fee shall be based on actual costs associated with the review and approval of the application. The application shall not be considered complete unless and until the application fee is paid. (4) An application for a temporary homeless encampment permit must be filed at least 30 days before the date on which the temporary homeless encampment is proposed to move onto the proposed location; provided, that the city manager may agree to a shorter period in the case of an emergency beyond the control of the host agency and sponsoring agency. (5) An application for a temporary homeless encampment permit shall be processed as a Type I temporary use permit under Chapter NPMC. (6) The city manager shall coordinate review of the temporary homeless encampment permit with appropriate city staff and with other appropriate public agencies, including, but not limited to, Public Health — Seattle and King County and the Burien—Normandy Park Fire Department. The city manager may issue the temporary homeless encampment permit if the application demonstrates that: (a) Allof the requirements of NPMC 18.110030 . . are met; and (b) The temporary homeless encampment will not be materially injurious to the public health, safety, and welfare or materially injurious to the property or improvements in the immediate vicinity (7) Decisions of the city manager granting, granting with conditions, or denying a temporary homeless encampment permit shall be subject to appeal as provided in Chapter NPMC for Type I permit decisions. (0rd. 936 § 3, 2016). 18.11 0.030 Requirements for approval and operation. . temporary homeless (1) A-I.-.|..a - following meet all of the encampment must -Ir- 'lII"l'-'I'l—If -.‘—--I- -I-|-|——|- requirements in addition to any _._._,..:__.. other requirements L4...‘ imposed by this chapter: -'II——mI'-iI—I—'III'-'III—I— (a) The property number of proposed II-IIF -IJIII the -I1Il accommodate or building must be of sufficient size to II'I this section. required by 'IfIIfI I-I-IIfacilities i'II'f' residents and the on-site IIIIII and *2 tents ' (b) -r-.-. -.u----|l-must be made for the Adequate provision I.--.-.J.. -In-I-u|——-I-r|—'-'— provision of drinking water, disposal of human waste, .._ disposal garbage and other solid waste, -. .-_,_.—|--_|-.— of 15.:-..-services, I.-.|...__ -_--.provision of other and the including, but not I-I- II-I—Il-IIJI limited Ito, the following facilities: (i) Sanitary _|.I. portable toilets or other restroom facilities J-.|.|.-a|u|..--.1-.I-|.- Il'I' r theI. - in -I. -II-to meet I required number I—'l'I'health -ulrrr-.-I-IJ-u-I-rI'-rm--I-I-I-.-1-—’-5 regulations for the residents and staff of the temporary homeless encampment; and . _._.... .,,..._a.|. stations by the toilets or (ii) Hand washing —-_..—n.-.-__-_ restrooms and by food service areas; I. and (iii)Lb 1-II--%I:III"-II Refuse receptacles meeting the requirements of the city’s ‘HM and solid waste hauler; -I‘ (iv) A food service tent or other IJ'—IJ£III£II 'Il'PI'I' health department food service building or facility meeting H?IwI?'I." 'II' — I requirements; and 'I"I'fPII' (v) A II I —H"-PI.--J—v:H|I'11I-I—I-IuI management tent or other management office or facility providing Ir—::IJIx-I administrative and :securityIm -II‘--IIJI and visitors. identifiable to residents —'|-Iv-'—JII services and readily (c) The I - II III‘ temporary homeless encampment 'I-lIfI'JIxIIJ-IIII shall meet for the zoning district all setbacks Ii"I'I'I I—FJEIII 'I' Iflwhich the in 'I property is'I located; f—'f.- ‘I I'I""I'PI’I—f"—I—Ij—II"'Z provided, that where the I'l!"I temporary homeless encampment abuts I‘ property —' containing I-I—. jln residential 1 II-J2: uses, the temporary - encampment shall be set back 20 feet from ju-I:IEI'-IJI—II'I'I-f-I homeless the property line F-IJ—-I minimum setback or the uf— '-I‘FII" II-'I'Iu— provided in whichever is I- the NPMC, I"-l'I f'JI'||I greater. 'l sight J-.'-.A six-foot—ta|| (d) -I---r--.--'-'rlI-*5 rI- be provided obscuring fence shall fl'l'I"I'I.|' around the perimeter of the temporary ._ the city |__._..-.,_encampment unless homeless -....-_..u_ -.-|. manager determines ._-.- _..-|.a is sufficient vegetation, that there topographic variation, or -I-JII——I III from II"|IJ|PI of the use equivalent screening II-III-'- to provideJJfmIIIII other site conditions Zhlh adjacent M properties. IIIPI (e) exterior lighting Any and all XI "II.-1 IIIIII forI the jr—1i1 encampment —I 4‘! temporary homeless shall meet — - the Z_IZhI -‘I III requirements of the zoning property is located. 4I'—I—i”1I-FIII-I district in which the The maximum number FEII1-' (f) of residents within a temporary IJJII‘—-IIII'I homeless encampment IIIIII'I—fIIII'I'I'I shall not exceed ""'I—T 100. 'I "I1 Parking for (g) at least five vehicles shall be provided. -II-I-1»-lI—I——i—I-I  under the age 'of 18 shall children W (h) No I'IIIJ IIJ —--"*-‘HF be allowed in the temporary 'ffI'I'Jf'I'F homeless encampment. " If a 'I-_I'-|-.I---IrJI';.'-I child under the age of 18 attempts to reside : —the temporary homeless at - encampment, -1 '- the —:h'II':-agency or the host sponsoring II—dI-I—J|- immediately contact Child agency shall l|—lI-III-I Protective Services. 'r‘.IM'I‘ III-—II:IIJ-III (i) No animals I-II-I.I'IJII shall be permitted in the temporary I- homeless I I-I encampment, I i'III' I'I""’fI for service except animals. II. ' _(j) The sponsoring agency ILZA and/or the host agency shall submit a code of conduct for IIg—‘:§I.—I.-r——rI'—'I*|—'I-I—II-III:I the temporary I':I—: I-f- the code a statement describing how II1I'III—IIu1I1II-' homeless encampment and of conduct JII III'JI'II J?IfII'-I- willbe enforced. The . II-'I-'I-of conduct Ishall, code at a minimum, IIJI-I contain the following: I'I£II"I:'I'fII£ . . . (i) A prohibition J‘ rl-.-r -.-1-‘F on the --IrI‘-I-'---w— possession or use of illegal drugs or alcohol. .-.._2.:-_|_ with blades in jar:-_ (ii) A prohibition on the possession of guns, knives weapons of-I.all kinds. n' excess of three inches, andI . A prohibition on violence. |.||.J.-.-I-.I. (iii) (iv) open-'.I A prohibition on i -=.-.|-ua flames. I . - -I— (v) A prohibition on -'-I-'-.— '--'—surrounding trespassing into private property in the -I-.—I-I—.-1--I-1 - 4 neighborhood. . I. __;-_n-_-_- j-_..-_.._ on loitering in the surrounding (vi) A prohibition neighborhood. ...a.-|.is to be observed. Hours during which quiet -_--_.._ (vii) I1: IuIIA -I-IJ-'J- (k) ‘HIT-Ibe submitted transportation plan must ‘E byI:I'IIthe the host agency agency and/or"Hm sponsoring II—II'f 'I' providing I. for access to transit. All .—-I.‘-I'I—I I temporary ¥_ZjIP homeless encampments be located within -- d~"1I- must one- =..|.:._: half mile of transit service. I' homeless encampment II-f—I—'-—I—III (I)The temporary !l—HlP"II'I—State, the II-kg!’-?]'with all regulations of Washington II-III! must comply r=.-In-I.--I‘.-r city of Normandy Park, and . -.-I-.r and King Public Health Seattle fI'J'I'l'l' — -'-u.-County. -- Zil- -'l- The temporary homeless "....—J__"|...- . -=_.-_ encampment shall comply with the .-_.- . |..-..|_n| requirements of the .- Code--.=—||(-.n..-I. Cities Electrical International Fire.._..-rIa..|. as adopted by the city of Normandy ...L -a. Park. The Code and Washington -I-.sponsoring 'I"I agency and host J -.. I-'.-I-.I-I-I--'- -II.-I.-rr.-IIat all reasonable times r-‘ inspections I- permit agency shall 4-I-—from the by appropriate public officials — ”......g.._"__--__..— agencies enforcing these codes for code compliance. _- |.. -(m) The . _.-_- sponsoring agency shall take identification - _|.a|. . all reasonable and legal :—.|_. '-II'h-fII'I residents of from prospective - the - obtain steps to r.lJ.-.|.Iverifiable -I--I-r'I-I-— temporary homeless -Ir|r-.- ._..--- encampments and use -- the E.-.‘ identification to obtain FZUHZWsex offender and warrant checks |..|.u|_._ from the appropriate agency. IfI--.- the warrant  and sex offender check reveals that a prospective resident or existing resident is a sex offender who is required to register with police or that the prospective resident has an outstanding warrant, the sponsoring agency shall reject the prospective resident or evict the existing resident. (n) Adequate access for fire and emergency medical apparatus shall be provided. (0) Adequate separation between tents and other structures shall be maintained in order to limit fire exposure and provide for emergency exiting by residents. (p) Temporary homeless encampment permits may be approved for a time period not to exceed 90 days. No temporary homeless encampment shall be permitted on any single property for more than 90 days in any calendar year. (0rd. 936 § 3, 2016). 18.110.040 Revocation of permit. The city manager may revoke a temporary homeless encampment permit for violation of any of the requirements of NPMC 18.110.030 . A decision of the city manager to revoke a temporary homeless encampment permit is a Type I decision that may be appealed to the hearing examiner as provided in Chapter . NPMC. The decision of the city manager to revoke a temporary homeless encampment permit shall be stayed during any appeal to the hearing examiner, but the stay will be lifted if the hearing examiner upholds the revocation. Decisions of the hearing examiner on a temporary homeless encampment permit revocation may be appealed to the King County superior court as provided in Chapter RCW. (0rd. 936 § 3, 2016). 2022 Docket List DRAFT Legislation responding to EZSHB 1220 1. Propose Housing Element policy amendments that clarifyn the response to EZSHB1220 proportionate to Normandy Park size, and focus on an exceptionally humane and dignified ,. approach using public health and safety as the cornerstones for planning tools and _' standards, and which encourage a regional approach to the mandates in the legislation. . Propose NPMC interim ordinance amendments to define and permit types contained H.in EZSHB1220 (transitional housing, permanent supportive . . housing, emergency _ , and housing, I __ preemptions of emergency shelter) that respond to bill mandates containing the following I. ,:l . local zoning authority*: 0 A code city shall not prohibit transitional housing or permanent supportive housing in any zones in which residential dwelling units or hotels are allowed... 0 a code city shall not prohibit indoor emergency _ sheltersn and indoor emergency 7. housing in any zones in which hotels are allowed... *as described in Maple Valley Ordinance 0-21-726 Legislation implementing first-year recommendations in the Economic Development JReport Propose Economic Development policy amendments I ' to focus on IV‘ I improving I the retail experience in the city's commercial areas. A n varietyI of strategies could be pursued to improve the stability of existing businesses. These businesses H . help build strong vibrantn walkable communities by linking neighbors to needed services - n . u also providing jobs and while y generating revenue for the local economy. . Propose NPMC amendments to amend temporary n use provisions to fill gaps in the uretailn environment in the city's commercial areas. . Propose Comprehensive Plan policy to guide improving regulatory code clarity 1) between |- n" ' the general municipal code and the Normandy:_ Park n Manhattan Village Subarea Plan Planned Action Ordinance and 2) within the TDR, n PRD, and cottage housing * ‘i NPMC.u . This will ‘n provide direction for future code amendments n to mutually '-n support and align residential and business development to lead to overall greater community vibrancy, connectivity, n 1 u .u stability, and place-making. Propose Transportation Element policy amendments to improve pedestrian and bicycle connections . leverage infrastructure, improvements Propose Comprehensive Plan policy amendments to _ .,. .. to continue a Normandy Park brand and identity. n  This 2uickNotes PA was prepared by A/exsandra Gomez, S researchassociate at the American Planning Assodation Asset-Based Community Development Asset—Based Community Development (ABCD)is an approach that uses the existing resourcesof a community to support its development Ratherthan focusing on challenges or resources that are lacking, ABCDseeks to identifyoften unrecognizedassets produced by local individuals,associations, and institutions, and then worksto build on those assets to sustain a community and support its growth. Community Planners can use ABCDto inform solution-orientedand conscious practices in allaspects of the planning Wsioning & process. ABCDcan enhance planning work in many ways and serves as a useful frameworkto advance Production equitable and restorative planning. BACKGROUND |:vALUAI IUN Since its inception in the 19905, ABCDhas generated an in?uential body of literature. for many social ‘ ' science disciplines and professional?elds.Asset—based approaches such as ABCDencourage researchers and practitioners to see the people they engage with and serve as capable of making positive contributions to their community. Thefouressentialelementsof an Asset-BasedCommunity Development Plannerscan use an asset—basedlensto uncoverthe natural ways that communities thrivedespite process. Credit:AdaptedfromMcKnig disadvantage or disinvestment, which can then informtheir planning decisions.Eachcommunity has a and Russell20 i 8 (CCBY—NC ht 4.0). unique set of assets that are place based and steeped in localhistoryand culture,and plannersmay not have the perspective or knowledge needed to identifythose assets. ABCDoffersplannersa processfor learning directly from community memberswhat they ?nd meaningful and what is necessary fortheir community to prosper. Once a community's assets are identi?ed and recognizedthrough the ABCDapproach, plannerscan then leverage formalgovernmental and organizationalplanning resources to build on these assets, whilealso ensuring their actions do not undermine them. Of?cialacknowledgement of localpeoples’capacities, talents, creativity, and imaginations can begin to reverse the effects of a history of misunderstanding, stigmatizing, or disrupting localassets—whetherintentional or not. ELEMENTS OF ASSET-BASEDCOMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT The four essential elements of ABCDare resources,methods, functions, and evaluation(McKnightand Russell2018). Practitioners can address the elements in any order. The resources element describessix types of assets that communities can use to prosper.Three of these are community actors: residents,associations,and institutions.The fourth is localplaces,or bounded areas shared by community actors that featurethe built and natural environment. The?fth resource is exchange, a core community activity. it can be monetary, but many nonmonetary forms of exchange exist and are more signi?cant to ABCD.The?nal resource is stories, which is how community members share knowledge from the past and create visions forthe future. The methods element describes how communities use resources.When determining appropriate methods, ABCDcalls for ?rst starting withthose that recognize what the community is alreadydoing for itself,such as discovery through asset mapping; then, those that identifysmallopportunities for external support, such as co—creatingsolutionsthrough charettes; and ?nally, those for leveraging outsideaidand resources for major needs, such as localcomprehensive or hazard mitigation planning. The functions element describesseven community functions that are necessary forlocalsuccess and health, security, ecology,economies,foodproduction,childrearing,and community care. Amcncan Planning Assocaatuon well—being: Planning Advisory Servic Cxeating -‘reatfomrrr (" GreatCommunities for/ 'nitI'ast’tr*A A Publicationofthe American Planning Association PASQuickNotesNo.97 The ?nalelement is evaluation.This element measures the levelof local engagement in the ?rst three elements.Practitioners should take this as an opportunity to take stock of what is working and what they can improve or correct in the ABCDprocess. USINGABCDTO ENHANCE PLANNIN Plannerscan use the ABCDprocess and relatedtools to enhance planning activities. Whereasa de?cit—based approachassumes planners must complete their workbeforea community can participate in community functions,ABCDasserts that the role of plannersis what they can do aftera community performsfunctions light of any externalconstraints and systematic disadvantages. to the best of their abilities——in ABCDis especiallyvaluable for community engagement. Plannersoften see themselves as prob|em— whichtypicallyrelieson a de?cit—based solvers, that are mindset.In contrast, ABCDfacilitatesengagement techniques solution—orientedand rooted in seeing residentsas empoweredand knowledgeable (Garcia 2019). Asset mapping is a tool that can help community members visuallyidentify localresources.Thegoal isto produce more than a list of resources; it should increase the number of community members who are ac- tivelyinvolvedin decision making for land-use,capitalimprovements, or infrastructureservices (Duncan 2016). Asset mapping can inform development strategies that minimize displacement, strengthen sense of place,and embrace local histories. Finally,plannerscan use ABCDto develop asset—based language in plans, policies,and communications. A common pitfallis describing places in terms ofde?cits.Phrasessuch as"crime-riddenneighborhood”or "high—poverty area”stigmatize the community and its people and obscures the role planning and policy FURTHER EADING may have had in creating these conditions. Published by the American Using asset—based language can empower residentsinstead of making them feel de?cient and power- Planning Association less.Thiscan strengthen the connection between planning workand community members. Note that American Planning Association.2021. asset—based language should not ignore or underestimate serious problems that communities want to ?x Creative Placemaking .APA Research instead, it should highlight the speci?c systemic forces that cause disadvantage and disinvestment and . Know|edgeBase. promote the implementation of systemic solutions. Garcia, Ivis,Andrea Gar?nkel-Castro, BEYONDPOWER AND PLACE and DeirdrePfeiffer.2019. Communitieswith many assets—suchas resilientpractices and strong senses of place—may stillface social, WithDiverse Communities . PASReport ‘ W economic, or environmentalcha|lenges.Throughits focus on restoring community controland enabling 593. Chicago: American Planning A5- authenticcollaborationwith and respect for residents,ABCDcan help planners reckonwith thisfact. sociation. Vazquez, Leonardo. 2016." TEBIIV Byrecognizing that communities already have assets, ABCDforces planners to re?ect on the current or Placemaking PASMemo, November- ” historicimpacts of institutionalbarriersand systemic harm. It draws attention to the policiesand practices December. that destabilizedthe economic, social,and physicalfoundationsof many communities. Planning policies that come out of ABCDshould, in the end, restore relationships,remove barriers,and provide formal sup- port for community success. Other Resources Asset-BasedCommunity Development In linewith conventional narratives that focus on challenges, not strengths, residents of such communi- (ABCD)Institute at DePaul University. ties might defaultto de?cit-based mindsets. Using ABCDto integrate the asset—basedlens in planning 2021. Publications work can af?rmthat residents have control overtheir personaland collective wel|—being, despite decades of being told otherwise. Duncan, Dan. 2016. Asset—Mappmg Toolkit Clear impact. CONCLUSIO Garcia, Ivis (editor). 2019. ‘Community ‘ ‘ , ABCDcan be an effective strategy for translating planning activities to the unique context of a commu- Engagement Techniques‘.”ABCDPrac- nity. It can promote planning that isconscious of localcultureand the impacts of planning historywhen titioner Series.University of Utah and tailoringsolutionsfor community restoration or growth. Bybecoming familiarwith the elements of ABC ABCDInstitute at DePaul Universitv. plannerscan use it as a frameworkforintegrating an asset—based D, approach in all aspects of their work. McKnight,John, and Cormac Russell. PASQuickNotes(ISSN2169- i 940) is a publication of the AmericanPlanningAssociation'sPlanningAdvisoryService(PAS).Joel Albizo,moreoar,Chief 2018."‘The Four Essential Elements of ExecutiveOf?cer,PetraHurtado, PHD, ResearchDirector,Ann Di/lemuth,AICP,Editor.©2021 American PlanningAssociation, 205 N.MichiganAve, Suite an Asset—Based CommunitvDevelop- ment Process ABCDInstitute at DePaul " 1200,Chicago,IL60601-5927;planning.org_ .AIirightsreservedAPApermits thereproductionand distributionof PASQuickNotesto educateand informpublicaf?cla/5and others about importantplanning-relatedtopics.VisitPASonlineat7 . planning.org/pas ' , 1 to ?ndout how PAScan workforyou. University A Publicationofthe American Planning Association| PASQuickNotesNo.97