Inland Wetlands, Water Courses & Conservation Commission
Regular MeetingNorwich, CT · May 5, 2016
Minutes
May 5, 2016 Regular Meeting Minutes
CITY OF NORWICH
INLAND WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Lower-level Conference Room
23 Union Street, Norwich, Connecticut
Agenda Items A, B & C – Call To Order, Roll Call, and Determination Of Quorum:
Chairman Richard Morell called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Richard Morell, Chairman
Douglas S. Lee, Vice-Chairman
Brandon Hyde
David Poore
Robert McCoy, Alternate
Art Sharron, Alternate
Absent: Philip Kiley
Barbara Rothstein
Also Present: Linda Lee Smith, Administrative Secretary
It was determined there was a quorum.
Richard Morell introduced Donald Poland, professional wetlands staff for the
City of Norwich.
D. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES:
Upon motion by Douglas Lee and seconded by David Poore the Commission
voted unanimously to APPROVE the minutes of the April 7, 2016 regular
meeting.
E. COMMUNICATIONS: None
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
G. OLD BUSINESS:
1. IWWCC #16-01 – 27, 51, & 59 Norwich Avenue – Application from
Norwich NE Development, LLC for the demolition of an existing building and
construction of an 8,320 sq. ft. retail building with 42 parking spaces, loading
zone, and associated utilities within the Upland Review Area.
Donald Poland stated he reviewed the application, and the applicant had
submitted revised plans and answered all related questions. Mr. Poland stated
it’s not a disturbance to the wetlands, but it is in a regulated area and in relation
to a watercourse. Mr. Poland stated his comments related to the wetlands were
to the design of the drainage system and plunge pool because of its location near
the brook and the revised plan had improved it. Mr. Poland stated he had
reviewed the answers to the City Engineer and felt comfortable with the plan and
revisions.
Mr. Bill Sweeney, land use attorney with TCORS in New London gave a brief
presentation. Mr. Sweeney explained that this was a redevelopment project
consisting of the old B&C auto repair shop, taking the building down with minor
environmental cleanup, and putting retail use in the Taft station area of town. Mr.
Sweeney worked with Mike Saracin to rezone the property to allow the project to
proceed. Mr. Sweeney stated this is not a regulated activity permit for fill in the
wetlands but it is an upland review buffer permit and located more than 100’ ft.
from Hunters Brook which is the regulated watercourse area and only a small
portion of the paved parking lot is within the 100’ of the upland review area.
Ben Wheeler, licensed landscape architect, Director of Operations at
Engineer Design Professionals, South Windsor presented. Mr. Wheeler stated
the plans were to construct an 8,320 sq. ft. Family Dollar store. Mr. Wheeler
explained there were 3 parcels that would be consolidated into 2 parcels with the
entrance on Norwich Avenue. Mr. Wheeler stated Hunter Brook was down the
bottom of a very steep stable slope with quite a bit of vegetation grown over the
years and with no erosion issues. Mr. Wheeler stated there is a small portion of
the parking lot which falls within the upland review area. Mr. Wheeler stated the
storm water system is a traditional closed system to a series of underground
chambers at the north end of the parking lot which would serve the 25 year storm
as required per the regulations. Mr. Wheeler stated there was an overflow pipe
which comes out to the slope with a plunge pool at the end of the pipe to stabilize
the bank and any runoff and with no erosion down the bank. Mr. Wheeler stated
Mr. Poland’s comments were taken into consideration with the additional
topography info between outlet pipe and Hunter Brook and submitted a revised
plan. Mr. Wheeler stated the riprap channel would be going all the way down the
slope and there is no direct impact to any of the wetlands, it’s 6,000 sq. ft. of
disturbance within the upland review area, which he considers to be very minor
and would have negligible impact to the surrounding area.
Art Sharron asked if the holding tanks required maintenance. Mr. Wheeler
stated they would have to regularly be inspected that there wasn’t any sediment
building up; they were functioning properly; and a storm drainage report issued
would list the maintenance procedures.
Douglas Lee was concerned with the discharge and specifications around the
riprap because of the steep slope. Mr. Lee asked for more details concerning the
engineering and sizing of the riprap and plunge pool. Mr. Wheeler stated the
riprap was sized with the DOT standards for not only the size of plunge pool but
the size of the rock in the plunge pool and also the ripraps. Mr. Wheeler stated
he had revised the plan to make sure it was sized properly with the amount that
was coming out of the overflow.
2
Mr. Lee asked Mr. Poland for his opinion from an erosion standpoint if he was
satisfied it would be adequate. Mr. Poland stated the original plan had only the
plunge pool in the design and it didn’t have the riprap all the way down. Mr.
Poland had questioned how would it function with a larger than 25 year storm,
and the revised plan was designed to the 100 year storm. Mr. Poland stated that
the plunge pool was enlarged and the additional riprap was added. Mr. Lee
stated the riprap actually provides ability to withstand a 100 year storm as
opposed to originally a 25 year storm, with which Don Poland agreed.
Douglas Lee asked on the plan in reference to the limits of clearing that
correspond to the current clearance and vegetation. Mr. Wheeler stated there
was a little bit of clearance where the parking lot would have to be cleared for the
plunge pool and the riprap squall but the woods on the plan are the existing
vegetation on site.
Richard Morell asked if there would be any storage of fill on the site during
construction. Mr. Wheeler stated there would be a temporary top soil stock pile
and the erosion control plan shows that it’s properly protected and it wouldn’t
impact Hunter Brook.
Douglas Lee stated with the installation of the riprap a certain amount of
disturbance is almost unavoidable to the edge of either side of the riprap. Mr. Lee
wanted to know the extent of that disturbance and how they would stabilize post
construction. Mr. Wheeler stated the landscape plan shows an erosion control
mix to be planted in the disturbed area as well as erosion control mats, which
would minimize the disturbance as much as possible.
Douglas Lee asked what Mr. Poland’s perspective was on the adequacy of
the erosion control mix and mats. Mr. Poland stated there would be silt fencing,
hay bales and plunge pools with concern of the coverage the amount of area it
would be spanning, but Mr. Poland didn’t comment on it. The City Engineer
made comments and the new design included the riprap down to the brook, E&S
controls at the base of the plunge pools, and base of the channel for the brook
which are silt fencing and hay bales. Mr. Poland felt comfortable with the
Chairman’s comments in relation to time of year restrictions on construction and
worthwhile to consider. Bill Sweeney stated the reason to break ground on the
project in July was to be able to do site work in low flow conditions in August and
September and to avoid time of year such as early spring. Douglas Lee stated
when making the motion a condition could be stipulated for timing to assure that
the erosion control mix has a chance to root and grow by October.
David Poore asked if there was any new drainage collection from Norwich
Ave., or if it was all site related. Mr. Sweeney stated its all site related as Norwich
Ave. is a State road with its own drainage system, and this would not be
contributing anymore to Norwich Ave. and not disturbing into Hunter Brook.
3
Upon motion by Douglas Lee second by Art Sharron motion carried
unanimously to approval with the condition that the construction activities
associated with the installation of the riprap overflow, plunge pool and overflow
panel be done sufficiently early enough for the erosion control planting mix to
have a chance to adequately root before the end of October.
H. NEW BUSINESS: None
I. New Business items submitted after agenda preparation and prior to
the submission deadline:
1. IWWCC#16-02 – 460 & 474 West Main Street – Application from O’Reilly
Automotive Stores, Inc. for the construction of a retail store within a regulated
upland review area.
Upon motion by Art Sharron and seconded by Brandon Hyde the Commission
voted unanimously to TABLE the application until the next regular scheduled
meeting of June 2, 2016, in order to comply with the required 30 day petition
period.
J. Other Business: None
K. Violations: None
L. Adjournment
Motion was made by Art Sharron and second by David Poore to adjourn the
meeting at 7:22 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda Lee Smith
Administrative Secretary
4
Agenda
City of Norwich
Inland Wetlands, Watercourses & Conservation Commission
Regular Meeting
Lower Level Conference Room
23 Union Street, Norwich, CT
May 5, 2016 - 7:00 pm
Agenda
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Determination of Quorum
D. Approval of April 7, 2016 regular meeting minutes
E. Communications:
F. Public Hearings:
G. Old Business:
1. IWWCC #16-01 – 27, 51, & 59 Norwich Avenue – Application from
Norwich NE Development, LLC for the demolition of an existing building and
construction of an 8,320 sq. ft. retail building with 42 parking spaces, loading
zone, and associated utilities within the Upland Review Area.
H. New Business:
I. New Business items submitted after agenda preparation and prior to
the submission deadline:
1. IWWCC#16-02 – 460 & 474 West Main Street – Application from
O’Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. for the construction of a retail store within a
regulated upland review area.
J. Other Business:
K. Violations: None
L. Adjournment
Revised 5-4-16
Get email alerts for Norwich
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.