Zoning Board of Appeals
Regular MeetingNorwich, CT · May 11, 2010
Minutes
DRAFT
CITY OF NORWICH
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
May 11, 2010
Meeting Minutes
The regular meeting of the City of Norwich Zoning Board of Appeals was called
to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken and it was determined that a quorum
was present.
PRESENT: Marc Benjamin, Chairman
Joseph Jacaruso, Co-Chairman
Dorothy Travers
Paul Kramarewicz
Santo Rizzuto-Alternate
Raymond Dussault-Alternate
ABSENT: Henry Olender
ALSO PRESENT: Tianne Phoenix Curtis, Zoning Enforcement Officer
Darlene Fedus- Papineau, Recording Secretary
E. COMMUNICATIONS: NONE
F. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES
On a motion by Rizzuto/Kramarewicz, it was voted unanimously to
approve the minutes of the April 13, 2010 regular meeting.
G. OLD BUSINESS - NONE
H. NEW BUSINESS
1. V#10-06 – Appeal of Ed Krodel III on behalf of owner Daniel Ruffo for
property located at 12 Sunrise Street, located in a Residential R-40
zoning district. In accordance with Sec.12.1 50’ Rear Yard setback
request to reduce to 21’to allow construction of rear deck.
Seated were, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul Kramarewicz,
Santo Rizzuto and Raymond Dussault.
Ms. Curtis entered into the record as Exhibit “A”, public notices of 04/30/10
& 05/07/10, as “B”, ZBA application/Grounds for Appeal; as “C” notice of
variance application; as “D”, Abutters Certification of Notice; as “E”,
1 of 6
Assessor’s street card; as “F”, sketch of proposed deck; as “G”, Footprint
of existing home; and as “H”, Certified mailing of agenda to applicant.
Speaking in favor of the application was Ed Krodel lll, of South Chestnut
St, Wauregan CT. Mr. Krodel told the Board that due to the strict
requirements in that area it is difficult to meet the setbacks and the fact
that the well is located in the rear yard. The Board asked the applicant
several questions relevant to the placement of the stairs, the topography
of the property, and location of septic due to the fact that the applicant did
not provide pictures pertaining to the application. After much discussion,
the applicant stated the hardship would be reasonable use of the property.
There being no other speakers, the public hearing was closed.
2. V#10-07 – Appeal of Ana-Mari Ellington for property located at 36
Huntington Ave, located in a Residential R-20 zoning district. In
accordance with Sec.12.1 30’ Front Yard setback request to reduce
to 3’; 15’ Northeasterly Side Yard setback request to reduce to 2’; 15’
Southwesterly Side Yard setback request to reduce to 14’ to allow
construction of a single-family home.
Seated were, Marc Benjamin, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul
Kramarewicz, Santo Rizzuto and Raymond Dussault.
Ms. Curtis entered into the record as Exhibit “A”, public notices of 04/30/10
& 05/07/10, as “B”, ZBA application/Grounds for Appeal; as “C” notice of
variance application; as “D”, Abutters Certification of Notice; as “E”,
Assessor’s street card; as “F”, Sample floor plan of proposed home; as
“G”, Footprint and setbacks of existing home; as “H”, Certified mailing of
agenda to applicant; and as “I”, Existing conditions print.
Speaking in favor was the applicant, Ana-Marie Ellington, presently of 151
Mill Rock Road, Old Saybrook, CT and owner of 36 Huntington Avenue,
Norwich, CT. She told the Board that due to a fire in 2009, the house has
been condemned and needs to be demolished per a Structural Engineer
hired by the applicant. She stated that her only option is to build a
modular home and stated her hardships as, the location of the septic and
leaching field, the narrowness of the property, and a brook located in the
rear of the property. The new structure would be placed sideways on the
property facing the southerly side and would be 4.4 feet further on the
property reducing an existing sightline problem due to the existing 4 foot
deck and stairs being eliminated form the proposed house.
Speaking in opposition was David and Teresa Gray of 32 Huntington
Avenue. Mr. Gray stated he was concerned with the placement of the
house and the structural integrity of an existing retaining wall. He said he
would like to see the house placed 20’ further then where it is proposed.
The Board informed Mr. Gray that they are there to discuss the direction
and placement the house. Mr. Dussault informed the applicant that he
didn’t think the applicant was taking advantage of an opportunity or
Page 2 of 6
maximizing her potential in regards to the placement of the proposed
house. There was a brief discussion regarding wetlands and the Health
Department. Mr. Dussault stated he would have liked to have pictures of
the existing property.
There being no other speakers, the public hearing was closed.
3. V#10-08 – Appeal of Dwight Davis Jr. for property located at 5 Nelson
Street, located in a Residential R-40 zoning district. In accordance
with Sec.12.1 50’ Front Yard setback request to reduce to 32’; 50’
Rear Yard setback request to reduce to 45’ to allow construction of
pool.
Seated were, Marc Benjamin, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul
Kramarewicz, Santo Rizzuto and Raymond Dussault.
Ms. Curtis entered into the record as Exhibit “A”, public notices of 04/30/10
& 05/07/10, as “B”, ZBA application/Grounds for Appeal; as “C” notice of
variance application; as “D”, Abutters Certification of Notice; as “E”, Uncas
Health District approval; as “F”, Sketch of proposed deck with stairs; as
“G”, Certified mailing of agenda to applicant; and as “H”, Photograph of
front of home.
Ms. Curtis informed the Board that this property is a corner lot with two
front yards and falls under Section 5.6 in the regulations stating that pools
cannot be in a front yard. Speaking in favor was the applicant Dwight
Davis of 5 Nelson Street. He told the Board because of the corner lot, the
topography of the property and the location of the septic and leaching field
this is the only location the pool can be installed. There will be a small
deck and steps, which wouldn’t infringe on the setbacks. The Board
viewed pictures of the property showing the ledge on the property and the
area of the proposed pool.
There being no other speakers, the public hearing was closed.
I. DISCUSSION/DECISION ON APPLICATIONS
V#10-06 – Appeal of Ed Krodel III on behalf of owner Daniel Ruffo for
property located at 12 Sunrise Street, located in a Residential R-40
zoning district. In accordance with Sec.12.1 50’ Rear Yard setback
request to reduce to 21’to allow construction of rear deck.
Seated were, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul Kramarewicz,
Page 3 of 6
Santo Rizzuto and Raymond Dussault.
Mr. Benjamin recluse himself and Mr. Dussault will be voting on this
application.
Mr. Dussault noted that the applicant did not provide pictures or drawings
and didn’t believe the applicant didn’t have a hardship. He stated that if
drawings or pictures were provided it would details any hardships the
applicant is trying to prove. Mr. Kramarewicz noted the hardships as the
small lot, the location of the septic and the owner not having reasonable
use of the property. Mr. Dussault informed the Board that location of well
is an issue and not the septic. It was noted that there wasn’t any
opposition from abutters. Mr. Benjamin noted that the 50’ setback
required is a hardship due to the fact that at present the house is only 38’,
which makes it pre-existing, non-conforming.
Mr. Rizzuto made a motion to amend the motion made by
Kramarewicz/Travers to include to the hardships stated above, the pre-
existing non-conforming lot.
V#10-06 – Appeal of Ed Krodel III on behalf of owner Daniel Ruffo for
property located at 12 Sunrise Street, located in a Residential R-40
zoning district. In accordance with Sec.12.1 50’ Rear Yard setback
request to reduce to 21’to allow construction of rear deck.
APPROVED
V#10-07 – Appeal of Ana-Mari Ellington for property located at 36
Huntington Ave, located in a Residential R-20 zoning district. In
accordance with Sec.12.1 30’ Front Yard setback request to reduce
to 3’; 15’ Northeasterly Side Yard setback request to reduce to 2’; 15’
Southwesterly Side Yard setback request to reduce to 14’ to allow
construction of a single-family home.
Seated were, Marc Benjamin, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul
Kramarewicz, Santo Rizzuto and Raymond Dussault.
The Board discussed the hardships; the homeowner doesn’t have
reasonable use of her property, the location of the septic and the fact that
the property is pre-existing non-conforming. The Board noted that the
applicant is improving the site line issue for the neighbor. The Board
conditioned the variance to include the existing house will be knocked
Page 4 of 6
down.
On a motion by Rizzuto/Travers it was unanimously voted to approve the
variance with the condition that the existing house be knocked down.
V#10-07 – Appeal of Ana-Mari Ellington for property located at 36
Huntington Ave, located in a Residential R-20 zoning district. In
accordance with Sec.12.1 30’ Front Yard setback request to reduce
to 3’; 15’ Northeasterly Side Yard setback request to reduce to 2’; 15’
Southwesterly Side Yard setback request to reduce to 14’ to allow
construction of a single-family home. APPROVED WITH CONDITION
THAT THE EXISTING HOUSE WILL BE KNOCKED DOWN.
V#10-08 – Appeal of Dwight Davis Jr. for property located at 5 Nelson
Street, located in a Residential R-40 zoning district. In accordance
with Sec.12.1 50’ Front Yard setback request to reduce to 32’; 50’
Rear Yard setback request to reduce to 45’ to allow construction of
pool.
Seated were, Marc Benjamin, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul
Kramarewicz, Santo Rizzuto and Raymond Dussault.
The Board discussed the hardship as the location of the septic tank and
the topography. They also mentioned the fact that the pool would be
mostly in the side yard not the front.
On a motion by Dussault/Kramarewicz, it was unanimously voted to
approve the variance.
V#10-08 – Appeal of Dwight Davis Jr. for property located at 5 Nelson
Street, located in a Residential R-40 zoning district. In accordance
with Sec.12.1 50’ Front Yard setback request to reduce to 32’; 50’
Rear Yard setback request to reduce to 45’ to allow construction of
pool.
K. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Kramarewicz/Rizzuto, it was unanimously voted to adjourn
at 7:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Page 5 of 6
Darlene Fedus-Papineau
Recording Secretary
Page 6 of 6
Agenda
CITY OF NORWICH
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
23 Union Street- Lower Level -7:00PM
A. Call to Order
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Roll Call
D. Determination of Quorum
E. Communications
F. Acceptance of Minutes of April 13, 2010 meeting
G. Old Business: None
H. New Business
1. V#10-06 – Appeal of Ed Krodel III on behalf of owner Daniel Ruffo for property
located at 12 Sunrise Street, located in a Residential R-40 zoning district. In
accordance with Sec.12.1 50’ Rear Yard setback request to reduce to 21’to
allow construction of rear deck.
2. V#10-07 – Appeal of Ana-Mari Ellington for property located at 36 Huntington
Ave, located in a Residential R-20 zoning district. In accordance with Sec.12.1
30’ Front Yard setback request to reduce to 3’; 15’ Northeasterly Side Yard
setback request to reduce to 2’; 15’ Southwesterly Side Yard setback request to
reduce to 14’ to allow construction of a single-family home.
3. V#10-08 – Appeal of Dwight Davis Jr. for property located at 5 Nelson Street,
located in a Residential R-40 zoning district. In accordance with Sec.12.1 50’
Front Yard setback request to reduce to 32’; 50’ Rear Yard setback request to
reduce to 45’ to allow construction of pool.
I. Discussion/Decisions on Applications
J. Other Matters
K. Adjournment
Get email alerts for Norwich
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.