Zoning Board of Appeals
Regular MeetingNorwich, CT · October 11, 2011
Minutes
DRAFT
CITY OF NORWICH
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
October 11, 2011
Meeting Minutes
The regular meeting of the City of Norwich Zoning Board of Appeals was called
to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken and it was determined that a quorum
was present.
PRESENT: Marc Benjamin, Chairman
Joseph Jacaruso, Co-Chairman
Dorothy Travers
Paul Kramarewicz
Henry Olender
Raymond Dussault-Alternate
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Tianne Phoenix Curtis, Zoning Enforcement Officer
Jacquie Barbarossa, Recording Secretary
E. COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Curtis passed out Plan of Conservation and Development questionnaires to
all board members and asked them to complete per instructions on the form.
F. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES
On a motion by Jacaruso/Travers, it was voted unanimously to APPROVE
the minutes of the September 13, 2011 and May 10, 2011 regular
meetings.
G. OLD BUSINESS
1. V#11-16 – Request of Randy Robinson for property located
at 4 Barbers Road in a Residential R-80 zoning district. In
accordance with Sec.12.1 R-80 60’Front yard required,
request reduction to 52’; 40’ Side yard required, request
reduction to 6’ for the construction of a 14’x15’ seasonal
room and 14’x12’ deck.
Seated were, Marc Benjamin, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul
Kramarewicz, Henry Olender and Raymond Dussault.
Ms. Curtis explained that the hearing was not opened at last months
meeting due to a faulty abutters notice. She read in Exhibits “A” – “I”.
1 of 4
Speaking in favor was the applicant, Randy Robinson Jr. He told the
board he wanted to add a seasonal room with deck. He stated that there
is a stonewall bordering his property to the right and a large wooded area
separating his home from the neighbors. He has an existing 6-foot
cement structure with steps that have been there since the home was built
which are in disrepair. He stated his hardships were locations of the well
and septic. He also said due to the original placement of the home and
the location of the driveway and kitchen this location makes the most
sense.
Ms. Curtis passed out an aerial GIS map of the property and surrounding
area with the location of the abutter’s homes to the board members.
There being no other speakers, the public hearing was closed.
H. NEW BUSINESS: None
H. DISCUSSION/DECISION ON APPLICATIONS
1. V#11-15 – Request of Stephen Majeski for property located
at 43 Canterbury Tpke in a Residential R-40 zoning district.
In accordance with Sec.3.24.1 to permit the use of a shared
driveway for residential use. (Public Hearing closed;
Decision tabled from 09/13/2011 regular meeting.)
Marc Benjamin recused himself on this application. He stated he had advised
the members to review the minutes, tape and file.
Seated were, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul Kramarewicz, Henry and
Raymond Dussault.
There was discussion among the board members regarding who owned the
property. Ms Curtis stated this property is still the original owner and that the
neighboring property (45 Canterbury) was sold or in the process of being sold
and that the shared driveway would have been written into schedule “A” at time
of transfer.
Ray Dussault stated that the original owners were the ones that had agreed to
the shared driveway for development purposes and questioned who deemed that
2 separate driveways would not work on the property.
Ms Curtis reiterated that the applicant had stated that staff had previously
approved the shared driveway but since they were no longer employed by the
City she was unable to verify any such plan. She also stated that the IWWCC
approval had indicated a shared driveway but the final site plan did not.
Ray asked what the applicant claimed as the hardship. Ms. Curtis stated the
applicant stated it was the grade and redirection of runoff due to retaining walls.
Page 2 of 4
Ray questioned whether this was a self-imposed hardship.
Mr. Olender stated that the State of CT had created a drainage issue due to
drainage from Harland Rd. and Wayne St. and this would solve the erosion
problem on the street.
There was discussion on whether the applicant could put a driveway in another
location. Ms. Curtis stated the property is a lot of record and could meet current
zoning requirements.
Ray Dussault stated he would not support the application.
There was discussion on whether more information should be requested. Mr.
Dussault said it was constructed as a violation and more information would not
change that.
Ray Dussault asked Ms. Curtis if the applicant could come back with a new plan
for the driveway if this variance was unfavorable. Ms. Curtis stated it would not
need ZBA approval if it were not a shared driveway.
Mr. Dussault made a motion to deny the proposal since it is a self-induced
hardship. There was no second.
Paul Kramarewicz made a motion to approve the variance, seconded by Dottie
Travers. Joe Jacaruso and Dottie Travers voted for approval, Ray Dussault,
Hank Olender and Paul Kramarewicz, opposed. DENIED (2-3).
2. V#11-17 – Request of David Kendall for property located at
330 Canterbury Tpke in a Residential R-40 zoning district.
In accordance with Sec.12.1 R-40 50’ Front yard required,
request reduction to 36’; 50’ Rear yard required, request
reduction to 29’; 30’ southerly Side yard setback required,
request reduction to 18’ for the construction of an18’x33’
pool and 25’x26’ deck. (Public Hearing closed; Decision
tabled from 09/13/2011 regular meeting.)
Seated were, Marc Benjamin, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Paul
Kramarewicz, Henry Olender and Raymond Dussault.
Ms. Curtis stated she had received exhibit “O”- statement from neighbor and
exhibit “P” - 6 photos of the property and revised exhibit “N” – permit application
modifying the pool size from 18’ x 33’ ft. to 18’ x 18’ ft.
Marc Benjamin stated the decision was tabled due to an error on math
calculation and apologized to the applicant.
Paul Kramarewicz made a motion to approve the variance given the location of
the septic system, with the reduced pool size of 18’ x 18’, seconded by Marc
Page 3 of 4
Benjamin. Henry Olender amended the motion to include 48 to 50 feet of privacy
fence or vegetation to be approved by staff. Unanimously APPROVED with
amendment and condition.
3. V#11-16 – Request of Randy Robinson for property located
at 4 Barbers Road in a Residential R-80 zoning district. In
accordance with Sec.12.1 R-80 60’Front yard required,
request reduction to 52’; 40’ Side yard required, request
reduction to 6’ for the construction of a 14’x15’ seasonal
room and 14’x12’ deck.
Seated were, Marc Benjamin, Joseph Jacaruso, Dorothy Travers, Henry Olender
and Raymond Dussault.
Ray Dussault made a motion to accept the variance due to the location of the
septic system and the original placement of the house on the lot, seconded by
Joe Jacaruso -unanimously APPROVED.
J. OTHER MATTERS-NONE
K. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Paul Kramarewicz, seconded by Joe Jacaruso it was
unanimously voted to adjourn at 8:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jacquie Barbarossa
Recording Secretary
Page 4 of 4
Agenda
CITY OF NORWICH
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
23 Union Street- Lower Level -7:00PM
A. Call to Order
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Roll Call
D. Determination of Quorum
E. Communications
F. Acceptance of September 13, 2011 and May 10, 2011 meeting minutes
G. Old Business:
1. V#11-16 – Request of Randy Robinson for property located at 4 Barbers Road in a
Residential R-80 zoning district. In accordance with Sec.12.1 R-80 60’Front yard
required, request reduction to 52’; 40’ Side yard required, request reduction to 6’ for
the construction of a 14’x15’ seasonal room and 14’x12’ deck. (Public Hearing not
opened)
H. New Business: None
I. Discussion/Decisions on Applications
1. V#11-15 – Request of Stephen Majeski for property located at 43 Canterbury Tpke
in a Residential R-40 zoning district. In accordance with Sec.3.24.1 to permit the
use of a shared driveway for residential use. (Public Hearing closed; Decision tabled
from 09/13/2011 regular meeting.)
2. V#11-17 – Request of David Kendall for property located at 330 Canterbury Tpke in
a Residential R-40 zoning district. In accordance with Sec.12.1 R-40 50’ Front yard
required, request reduction to 36’; 50’ Rear yard required, request reduction to 29’;
30’ southerly Side yard setback required, request reduction to 18’ for the
construction of an18’x33’ pool and 25’x26’ deck. (Public Hearing closed; Decision
tabled from 09/13/2011 regular meeting.)
J. Other Matters
K. Adjournment
Last revised: 10/5/2011 3:23 PM
Get email alerts for Norwich
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.