City Council Workshop
Regular MeetingOakdale, MN · April 13, 2021
Minutes
WORKSHOP
OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
April 13, 2021
The City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, April 13, 2021, at Oakdale City Hall, 1584 Hadley
Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota. The meeting began at 5:00 PM.
Present: Mayor Paul Reinke
Council Members: Jake Ingebrigtson
Susan Olson
Colleen Swedberg
Kevin Zabel
Also Present: Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Jim Thomson, City Attorney
Susan Barry, City Clerk
Brian Bachmeier, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Jeff Koesling, Parks Superintendent
Alyssa MacLeod, Communications Specialist
Chelsea Petersen, Administrative Services Director
Emily Shively, City Planner
Bob Streetar, Community Development Director
Bill Sullivan, Police Chief
Julie Williams, Recreation Superintendent
Kevin Wold, Fire Chief
Stan Karwoski, Washington County Commissioner (virtual)
Ken Larson, Slumberland (virtual)
Connor McCarthy, United Properties (virtual)
Scott Peterson, United Properties (virtual)
Mitch Bartlett, Washington County (virtual)
Joe Gustafson, Washington County (virtual)
Stan Karwoski, Washington County (virtual)
Adam Josephson, Minnesota Department of Transportation (virtual)
SUMMERFEST
Communications Specialist MacLeod provided an overview of plans for the 2021 Summerfest
event: two-day event, food trucks, entertainment, skateboard contest, 5k, kids activities, art fair,
fireworks, medallion hunt, and scavenger hunt; no parade or carnival. She noted that no changes
had been made to the COVID guidelines discussed at the March 23 meeting. Communications
Specialist MacLeod further noted that “save the dates” information on Summerfest had been
posted and vendor applications were being finalized.
Parks Superintendent Koesling commented on the difficulties in planning and he supports not
holding Summerfest due an uptick in COVID cases. He indicated that Public Works staff would not
enforce the wearing of masks at outdoor events as mandated by the Governor. Parks
WORKSHOP
April 13, 2021
Page Two
Superintendent Koesling shared that he wanted Summerfest to continue be a positive reflection
on the city.
Communications Specialist MacLeod noted that Cottage Grove canceled their June festival and
other communities had not yet decided on whether to hold events.
Recreation Superintendent Williams stated that although the Summerfest Committee was hopeful
that the community event could take place, the increase in COVID cases has raised concerns.
In response to a question from Council Member Swedberg, Communications Specialist MacLeod
noted that a decision on whether or not to hold the event could be made next meeting.
Police Chief Sullivan commented on the potential of community events in the metro area
attracting demonstrators. He also commented on the difficulties relating to mask enforcement.
Council Member Olson supported canceling the event sooner rather than later and expressed
concern with staff being tasked with enforcing masks and social distancing.
In response to a question from Council Member Zabel, Communications Specialist MacLeod noted
that there would be no financial impact on the city should a decision to cancel the event be made
in early June rather than in May, besides a large cancellation fee if the fireworks were cancelled
and loss of deposits on some of the music groups.
Council Member Zabel supported holding off on a final decision on holding the event.
Police Chief Sullivan commented on the importance of having Summerfest dates locked down for
scheduling of police personnel.
Mayor Reinke asked that vendors be made aware of the potential that Summerfest could be
canceled or scaled back.
City Administrator Volkers offered that the event could be comprised of food trucks only.
Communications Specialist MacLeod offered that several pop-up events could be held.
In response to a question from Council Member Zabel, Recreation Superintendent Williams
shared that there had been a few incidents of persons not wearing masks at the city’s Indoor
Market but largely it has not been a problem.
Staff was directed to bring back options for a scaled down Summerfest event to the April 27 City
Council meeting.
WORKSHOP
April 13, 2021
Page Three
4FRONT EXPANSION
Community Development Director Streetar reviewed a request from Slumberland and United
Properties to develop up to 310,000 square feet of new construction north of County Road 14,
west of I-694, east of Ideal Avenue, abutting the Willowbrooke neighborhood to the north.
City Planner Shively added that a code amendment would allow two more permitted uses: light
manufacturing and office-showroom/office-warehouse.
In response to a question from Council Member Swedberg, City Planner Shively reviewed access
off of County Road 14.
In response to a question from Council Member Olson, Community Development Director Streetar
described the view of the buildings and landscaping from Willowbrooke.
City Planner Shively added that the city’s design standards would provide exterior standards for
the buildings.
In response to a question from Mayor Reinke, Scott Peterson, United Properties, explained that
the site would not connect to Willowbrooke on the north and described the right-in, right-out
access on the south. He added that trucks would park in the rear of the buildings.
Community Development Director Streetar added that in preparation for the additional
development of the 4Front site, Willowbrooke moved open space from the north portion of the site
to the south.
Mayor Reinke stated his support for the request.
Ken Larson, Slumberland, commented on the uniqueness of the site.
City Planner Shively noted that the next step would be to bring the code amendment to the
Planning Commission and then to the City Council
PROPOSED POLICY: SOCIAL MEDIA
Communications Specialist MacLeod reviewed the proposed policy on social media.
Staff was directed to bring the policy forth for adoption at the April 27 City Council meeting.
PROPOSED POLICY: DONATIONS TO PARKS
City Administrator Volkers reviewed an updated draft of a proposed policy that addresses
donations and memorials in city parks. She noted that Section 9.0: Gifts to the City would be
removed and made part of a different policy.
WORKSHOP
April 13, 2021
Page Four
Following discussion, staff was directed to rework portions of the draft policy and bring it back to
an upcoming Council work session.
COUNCIL TOPICS
Acorn Awards
Council Member Swedberg noted that the annual City Council tour of Acorn Award winning
properties was being considered for June 29.
After some discussion, the City Council asked that the tour be set for Tuesday, July 13, prior to the
start of the regular meeting.
ISD 622 Boundary Changes
Council Member Zabel shared that he had heard from a number of residents upset with some
elementary school boundary changes made by Independent School District 622 that will have
student attend school outside of Oakdale. He suggested that the City Council send a statement to
the school district supporting Oakdale residents attend schools in Oakdale.
Council Member Ingebrigtson recalled that in an earlier discussion, the superintendent stated that
families with at least one student attending Eagle Point Elementary School would be allowed to
continue to attend Eagle Point regardless of any boundary changes.
(Discussion to continue later in the meeting).
10TH STREET ACCESS
City Attorney Thomson reviewed correspondence sent to the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) opposing the termination of the Limited Use Permit relating to the access
to the HOM Furniture site (and daycare building) on 10th Street east of the I-694 ramp granted to
the city in 1993.
Mitch Bartlett, Washington County, provided an overview of the progress of the county’s project
that began in 2020: pedestrian trail to Cub Foods and flashing yellow signals for access to I-694.
He shared the county’s support for the access to remain open.
Adam Josephson, MnDOT, stated that the closure of the access was being sought for vehicle and
pedestrian safety at the access. He explained that the previous manager of the HOM Furniture
site had expressed concerns with vehicles cutting through the site to access Helmo Avenue or 10
Street as well as the speed traveled by some vehicles. Mr. Josephson added that MnDOT
contacted the city’s Community Development Department when it learned of the HOM Furniture
project and the Limited Use Permit was subsequently terminated by MnDOT.
WORKSHOP
April 13, 2021
Page Five
Mayor Reinke indicated that HOM Furniture wanted the access to remain open.
Council Member Ingebrigtson strongly opposed closing the access and asked if the flashing yellow
signals would help mitigate MnDOT’s safety concerns.
Mr. Josephson replied that the flashing yellow signals would likely reduce accidents at that
intersection.
Mr. Bartlett discussed options for the flashing yellow signals and stated that restricted access
would also increase safety.
Council Member Ingebrigtson asked if closing the access would increase safety concerns at the
10th Street and Helmo Avenue intersection. He added that he has witnessed a number of
accidents at that location and that he, in fact, had been in an accident at that intersection.
Mr. Josephson provided accident data projections for both locations showing an overall reduction
in accidents.
County Commissioner Karwoski stated his support for the city for the access to remain open. He
added that additional signal improvements in the vicinity would help address safety concerns.
Mayor Reinke asked that MnDOT consider leaving the access open until a determination can be
made on how the flashing yellow lights affect the flow of traffic.
Mr. Josephson offered the following options and stated that he would need to discuss them with
others:
1. Leave access open until a determination can be made on how the improvements made by
Washington County affect the traffic safety.
2. Close access after completion of Washington County’s project.
3. Close access at this time and Washington County to modify their current project.
It was the consensus of the City Council to leave the access on 10th Street open, collect data for a
number of years, and then make a determination on whether the access should be closed.
Mr. Josephson stated that should that option be acceptable to MnDOT, an agreement would need
to be reached that defines the timeframe and deadline for collecting data and for the Limited Use
Permit to be reinstated or redrafted that the city would cover costs relating to closure of the
access, when so determined. The council did not acknowledge or comment on that suggestion.
On another topic, County Commissioner Karwoski announced that federal approval had been
received on the Gold Line transit project.
WORKSHOP
April 13, 2021
Page Six
ISD 622 BOUNDARY CHANGES (cont.)
The City Council continued to discuss the Independent School District 622’s boundary changes
and supported sending individual letters to the school superintendent asking that Oakdale
residents have the opportunity to attend Oakdale schools.
ADJOURNMENT
The workshop adjourned at 6:52 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan Barry,
City Clerk
Agenda
AGENDA
City Council Workshop
The City Council workshop will be held via Zoom. Zoom is an online platform that allows persons to “attend” the
meeting via video or telephone.
View Workshop at: https://zoom.us/j/94017732722?pwd=akNFZXRKbmI5RWd5bHJNdU1VaFBadz09 from a
PC, Mac, tablet, iPhone, or Android device.
Or listen to the discussion by phone by calling 1-312-626-6799 and entering Meeting ID: 940 1773 2722, and
Passcode: 740782, when prompted.
While the workshop is available for public viewing, public comment will not be taken during the meeting.
Workshop
April 13, 2021
Council Chambers
5:00 PM Summerfest Update
5:15 PM 4Front Expansion
5:45 PM Proposed Policies: Social Media, Donations to Parks
6:15 PM 10th Street Access Closure (continued)
6:35 PM Council Topics
6:50 PM Adjourn for Regular Meeting
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Alyssa MacLeod, Communications Specialist on behalf of the Summerfest Committee
Date: April 13, 2021
Subject: Summerfest Update
At the April 13 Council Workshop, representatives from the Summerfest Committee will provide a verbal
update on the planning of the 2021 Summerfest event.
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Emily Shively, Planner
Date: April 13, 2021
Subject: PUD Ordinance Amendment for the 4Front Office and Industrial Area
INTRODUCTION
Slumberland and United Properties are requesting a Planned Unit Development zoning ordinance
amendment to permit additional uses on a portion of the west expansion area of the 4Front Technology
and Office Campus in order to facilitate up to 310,000 square feet of new construction. This
memorandum presents and evaluates the request.
BACKGROUND
The 4Front Technology and Office Campus encompasses 122 acres located on County Road 14,
abutting the Willowbrooke neighborhood to the north, and running from I-694 on the west to Ideal
Avenue North on the east (see Attachment A: Location Map).
The campus is guided Business Campus in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan allowing for Corporate
Offices, Light Manufacturing uses, and Office uses. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning for the
campus allows for Office uses and Research and Development uses. This special zoning district was
created when 3M owned the property (along with the land to the north that is now Willowbrooke). The
PUD was created in 1995 to accommodate the world headquarters of 3M’s spinoff business Imation
and create a multi-user business park for 3M and other office-industrial users.
Imation went out of business several years ago and Slumberland purchased the campus in 2016
around the same time that the City was undertaking a small area planning process for the 3M land that
is now the Willowbrooke neighborhood. Slumberland has rebranded the site as the 4Front Technology
and Office Campus.
The four buildings on the campus comprise a total of approximately 550,000 square feet and house a
number of office and research and development companies. There are nearly 65 acres remaining to be
developed – approximately 50 acres in the west expansion area and 15 acres in the east expansion
area (see Attachment B: Future Development Areas).
REQUEST
Slumberland has partnered with United Properties to develop the vacant land in the west expansion
area of the campus. Slumberland and United Properties (the “developers”) are proposing to designate
four parcels for future development in this area (see Attachment C: Proposed Development Area).
The developers are requesting that two new uses, Light Manufacturing and Office-showroom/Office-
warehouse, be allowed in addition to the currently allowed Office and Research and Development uses
on Parcel A. The developers have stated that there is a high demand for Light Manufacturing and
Office-showroom/Office-warehouse space and allowing those uses would realize development on the
site much sooner than waiting for an Office or Research and Development user.
In this initial phase of development, they are proposing to construct up to 310,000 square feet of new
space on Parcel A (approximately 24 acres adjacent to I-694). Depending on the number and type of
businesses interested in this location, the site could be developed with either one large building or two
smaller buildings (see Attachment D: Preliminary Site Plan Options). The developers have stated that
typical businesses need approximately 20,000-60,000 square feet for their operations, so there could
be several different users in the building(s). The preliminary site plans also show a new access drive on
County Road 14 to the west expansion area. Washington County is working with the developers to
evaluate the feasibility of a new access at that location.
ANALYSIS
A request for an ordinance amendment is evaluated by how well it achieves the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, consistency with other provisions in the zoning ordinance, compatibility with
adjacent land uses, and infrastructure capacity (roads, water, sewer, and storm sewer).
The draft ordinance (see Attachment E: Draft Ordinance Amendment) is the product of conversations
between staff and the developers with those criteria in mind and in a manner that provides certainty for
the City, the developers, and future tenants of the campus. The draft ordinance amendment defines
the area where the amendment applies (Parcel A), articulates the goals and purpose of the area,
defines what terms and uses mean, and outlines the permitted and prohibited uses. The list of
prohibited uses is intended to provide clarity as to what is allowed by addressing some uses that are
clearly not intended for this area.
Comprehensive Plan
The Business Campus Future Land Use guiding of the 4Front campus area is intended for uses that
provide high-quality employment opportunities (Corporate Offices, Light Manufacturing, Offices). The
City’s economic development goals and policies include maintaining and increasing living wage jobs to
provide a continually improving quality of life for all residents and attracting and retaining businesses
that complement and diversity the City’s economic base.
Staff is of the opinion that allowing Light Manufacturing and Office-showroom/Office-warehouse uses is
consistent with the Business Campus guiding and will provide additional employment opportunities in a
range of industry types that add to the diversification of the City’s economy. The draft ordinance
contains a Purpose statement to reflect those goals and policies from the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning, Land Use Compatibility, and Infrastructure Capacity
The PUD Concept Plan allows for up to 720,000 square feet of Office/Administration and Research and
Development uses across 43 acres in the west expansion area (see Attachment F: PUD Concept Plan).
Those uses would continue to be permitted under the draft ordinance amendment. The ordinance
amendment allows two additional uses on 24 acres of the west expansion area (Parcel A): Light
Manufacturing and Office-showroom/Office-warehouse.
Light Manufacturing is a use where products are being made, assembled, improved, or packaged in a
way that does not create noise, odor, or other nuisance conditions outside the building and does not
require any outdoor storage. These are businesses like Park Tool on Hadley Ave. N. and Motion Tech
Automation located in the Hale Ave. N. industrial park.
Office-showroom/Office-warehouse uses are businesses with a percentage of the space devoted to
office activities with the remainder of the space used for either display or storage of materials, goods, or
equipment. An example is Ferguson Bath, Kitchen, and Lighting Gallery located on Hale Ave. N.
2
The draft ordinance amendment requires twenty-five percent of an Office-showroom/Office-warehouse
space be dedicated to office activities since most of the job activity takes place in the office area and
not the display/storage space. The current ordinance requires twenty-percent office space in Office-
showroom/Office-warehouse uses. The additional five percent required by the draft ordinance
amendment is intended to ensure more employment opportunities with these new uses at the 4Front
campus. The developers have the flexibility to spread out the office space between users in a building;
some users may have less office space and others more, but the overall total shall be twenty-five
percent office space.
The draft amendment also allows the clear height in the warehouse portion of an Office-
showroom/Office-warehouse to be up to thirty-two feet to accommodate more storage area; the current
ordinance limits the warehouse ceiling heights to fourteen feet. Clear height is the open area of a
warehouse under any lights, trusses, etc. allowing the entire space to be used for “racking” or the
stacked storage of goods and materials. The developers have stated that this type of space is in high
demand.
It is anticipated that the addition of Light Manufacturing and Office-showroom/Office-warehouse uses
will be compatible with the 4Front Technology and Office campus. Slumberland has stated that they
have current businesses in the campus that would likely expand into this new space when it becomes
available.
In order to ensure compatibility with the Willowbrooke residential neighborhood to the north, the draft
ordinance amendment states that additional setbacks and a landscape buffer strip will be required
where Parcel A abuts the planned park and open space.
Staff has determined that there is sufficient infrastructure capacity (roads, water, sewer, and storm
sewer) to accommodate the proposed 310,000 square foot development in this location.
The following table summarizes this analysis:
EXISTING PROPOSED EVALUATION
Comprehensive Plan Corporate Offices, No change in the Guiding Proposed uses are
Guiding: Business Light proposed consistent with the
Campus Manufacturing, Comprehensive Plan
Offices
Zoning: Permitted Uses Office Office Proposed uses are
Research and Research and compatible with adjacent
Development Development land uses and there is
Light Manufacturing sufficient infrastructure
Office-showroom/Office- capacity to serve the
warehouse development
Percent office in Office- Twenty percent Twenty-five percent Higher percentage of
showroom/Office- office space will facilitate
warehouse employment generating
uses
Clear height/Ceiling Fourteen feet Thirty-two feet Additional clear height will
height in warehouse not create any issues at
component this location and will meet
current market demand
3
RECOMMENDATION
Staff evaluation has concluded that an amendment to allow Light Manufacturing and Office-
showroom/Office-warehouse uses on Parcel A is consistent with the goals and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan, those uses will be compatible with surrounding land uses, and there is sufficient
infrastructure to serve the proposed development. It is the opinion of staff that allowing more uses that
will provide employment opportunities and expand industry diversity is likely to achieve the City’s goals
more quickly than waiting for a large office or research and development user given the current market
trends.
COUNCIL QUESTION
Does the City Council want to expand the uses permitted on Parcel A in the west expansion area of the
4Front Technology and Office Campus to include Light Manufacturing and Office-showroom/Office-
warehouse uses?
ATTACHMENTS:
• Attachment A: Location Map
• Attachment B: Future Development Areas
• Attachment C: Proposed Development Area
• Attachment D: Preliminary Site Plan Options
• Attachment E: Draft Ordinance Amendment
• Attachment F: PUD Concept Plan
4
ATTACHMENT A: LOCATION MAP
WILLOWBROOKE
4FRONT TECHNOLOGY AND OFFICE CAMPUS
OAKDALE MARKETPLACE
OAKDALE STATION
ATTACHMENT B: FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREAS
WEST EXPANSION AREA
EAST EXPANSION AREA
ATTACHMENT C: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA
ATTACHMENT D: PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS – OPTION 1
ATTACHMENT D: PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS – OPTION 2
ATTACHMENT E: DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
City of Oakdale
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 3M/IMATION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
AND CONCEPT PLAN (ORDINANCE NO. 473) TO DESIGNATE FOUR AREAS IN THE WEST
EXPANSION AREA FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISH THE PURPOSE AND USES
FOR THE 4FRONT OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL AREA (PARCEL A)
The City Council of the City of Oakdale ordains:
Section 1. The 3M/Imation Planned Unit Development Agreement Concept Plan (Ordinance
473) is amended with regard to the west expansion area to denote four areas for future
development (Parcels A-D, Exhibit A).
Section 2. Parcel A in the west expansion area is established as the 4Front Office and
Industrial Area. This area consists of approximately 24 acres and may accommodate up to
310,000 square feet of building area.
Section 3. The 3M/Imation Planned Unit Development Agreement (Ordinance 473) is
amended with regard to the purpose, definitions, and permitted and prohibited uses in the
4Front Office and Industrial Area on Parcel A in the west expansion area as follows:
1. PURPOSE.
The purpose of the 4Front Office and Industrial area is to provide high-quality facilities for
office, research and development, light manufacturing, and office-showroom/office-
warehouse uses. These uses shall be sited, designed, and operated in a manner
compatible with the adjacent 4Front Technology and Office Campus and the Willowbrooke
residential neighborhood.
It is the intent of this area to increase the number of living-wage jobs available to the
residents of Oakdale. Employment opportunities that offer living wages contribute to a rising
standard of living for those employed and contribute to the overall quality of life in the
community. The 4Front Office and Industrial area is also intended to support the
diversification of the local economy by providing employment opportunities in a variety of
industry types.
2. DEFINITIONS.
a) Building supply stores and yards: Facilities providing retail or wholesale building
and/or landscaping materials and supplies.
b) Bulk storage buildings, yards and terminals: Facilities providing storage for bulk raw
materials which could become an airborne nuisance and which are not being used in
a manufacturing process on the premises.
c) Church: A building, together with its accessory buildings and uses, where persons
regularly assemble for religious worship and which building, together with its
accessory buildings and uses, is maintained and controlled by a religious body
organized to sustain public worship.
ATTACHMENT E: DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
d) Clear Height: Distance from the floor to the lowest-hanging ceiling member or
hanging objects, beams, joists or truss work descending down into a substantial
portion of the work area.
e) Cross Dock: Loading docks on opposite sides of a relatively shallow distribution
facility that allow for quick loading, sorting or unloading from one vehicle to another
(i.e., materials from one truck at a loading dock are unloaded, sorted and reloaded
onto one or more trucks).
f) Heavy Manufacturing: Any operation which assembles, improves, treats, compounds,
and/or packages goods or materials in a manner which would not qualify the
operation as light manufacturing, including manufacturing that requires outdoor
storage of bulk, raw or finished materials used in or resulting from the manufacturing
process.
g) Indoor Community Recreation: Facilities providing indoor entertainment (concerts,
theater, music, etc.), indoor exercise or sport clubs (including but not limited to
weight lifting, gymnastics, martial arts, tennis, basketball, indoor batting cages,
indoor golf, etc.), or similar uses.
h) Light Manufacturing: Any operation which assembles, improves, treats, compounds,
and/or packages goods or materials in a manner which does not create a noticeable
amount of noise, dust, odor, smoke, glare, or vibration outside of the building in
which the activity takes place, which does not require outside storage of goods or
materials and which does not generate (in the opinion of the City Council)
objectionable amounts of truck traffic.
i) Offices: Structures, or portions of structures, in which commercial or professional
activities take place but where goods are not produced, sold, or repaired.
j) Office-showroom/Office-warehouse: A use in which at least twenty-five (25) percent
of the floor space is devoted to office activities, the remainder being used for either a
showroom (display of materials, goods, or equipment) or warehousing (storage of
materials, goods, or equipment). The total percentage of office space required may
be spread across several Office-showroom/Office-warehouse users within a multi-
tenant building. Compliance with the minimum percentage/square footage
requirement shall be verified to the City before approval of any tenant improvement
building permit application. Clear height in the warehouse component shall not
exceed thirty-two (32) feet.
k) Open sales, rental, or storage lots, including but not limited to cars, buses, trucks,
motorcycles, bicycles, recreational vehicles, trailers, boats, mobile homes, machinery,
lumber, building materials, landscape materials, or similar items: Any land used or
occupied for the purpose of buying and selling any goods, materials, or merchandise,
and for the storing of same under the open sky prior to sale.
l) Outside storage: Exterior storage of finished or unfinished goods, materials, or
equipment.
m) Research and Development: Medical, chemical, electrical, metallurgical or other
scientific research conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.
ATTACHMENT E: DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
n) Schools: Unless otherwise specifically described in the ordinances of the City of other
applicable laws or regulations, the term school shall mean any building used for
educational purposes by five (5) or more persons at one time.
o) Self-service storage facilities: Real property designed and used for the purpose of
renting or leasing individual storage space to occupants who are to have access for
the purpose of storing and removing personal property. The term does not include:
(1) Property of a financial institution that contains vaults, safe deposit boxes, or other
receptacles for the uses, purposes, and benefits of the financial institution's
customers; (2) Warehousing as defined by this Section; or (3) A commercial parking
garage or parking lot that provides short-term motor vehicle parking.
p) Truck terminals, freight terminals, and freight forwarding services: A specialized
distribution building that facilitates simultaneous incoming and outgoing inventory, or
the immediate redistribution of goods from one truck to another (including cross-
docking facilities); a building or area devoted principally to the transfer and/or
storage of goods brought by truck.
q) Warehousing: The storage of materials, goods, or equipment within an enclosed
building with no associated office, research and development, or manufacturing
component.
3. PERMITTED USES:
1. Offices.
2. Research and Development.
3. Light Manufacturing.
4. Office-showroom/Office-warehouse.
4. PROHIBITED USES:
1. Truck terminals, freight terminals, and freight forwarding services.
2. Warehousing.
3. Heavy Manufacturing.
4. Self-service storage facilities.
5. Open sales, rental, or storage lots, including but not limited to cars, buses, trucks,
motorcycles, bicycles, recreational vehicles, trailers, boats, mobile homes, machinery,
lumber, building materials, landscape materials, or similar items.
6. Bulk storage buildings, yards and terminals.
7. Building supply stores and yards.
8. Outside storage.
9. Schools.
10. Churches.
11. Indoor Community Recreation.
Section 4. Screening through additional setbacks and a landscaping buffer strip is required
along the northern edge of Parcel A abutting the Willowbrooke neighborhood.
ATTACHMENT E: DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its adoption
and publication, as provided by law.
Paul Reinke, Mayor
AYES:
NAYS:
Passed by the City Council of the City of Oakdale this 25th day of May 2021.
Attest:
________________________________________
Susan Barry, City Clerk
Published:
PUD Subject Property
PUD SUBJECT PROPERTY EXHIBIT A
4Front Campus Master Plan
Parcel D
9.8 acres
Parcel A
23.57 acres
Parcel B
8.303 acres Parcel C
8.395 acres
PUD SUBJECT PROPERTY - PARCELS EXHIBIT A
4Front Campus Master Plan
ATTACHMENT F: PUD CONCEPT PLAN
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Alyssa MacLeod, Communications Specialist
Date: April 13, 2021
Subject: Social Media Policy
Social media is an effective way to reach a broad audience and communicate with the public. The City
of Oakdale uses a variety of social media sites to share information and engage with the public.
When using social media sites as a communications tool, it is customary and best practice to have a
policy that defines how these channels will be used and how information exchanged on these sites will
be handled. In certain cases, a social media policy can help protect the City from claims of infringement
of first amendment rights.
To date, the City of Oakdale has been using social media as a communications tool, but has not had a
policy for these purposes. It is recommended that the City adopt a social media policy. A policy has been
drafted for consideration.
The proposed policy addresses the following:
• Identifies official social media sites used by the City
• Defines how City social media sites will be used and administered
• Defines expectations for conduct on City social media sites
• Data ownership and retention
Standard Operating Policy
City of Oakdale
Policy Number: MIS-021
Subject: Social Media Policy
Number of Pages: 5
Approved: 2021
1.0 Policy Statement
1.1 The City of Oakdale supports the use of social media to advance the goals of the City
and its commissions and boards. The City of Oakdale will determine, at its discretion,
how its social media sites will be designed, implemented, and managed as part of its
overall communication and information sharing strategy.
2.0 Purpose
2.1 To communicate requirements regarding the use of social media sites and increase
awareness of acceptable conduct of covered persons, as defined in this policy, when
interacting on the City’s social media sites.
3.0 Scope
3.1 This policy applies to any existing or proposed social media site sponsored,
established, registered, or authorized by the City of Oakdale. The City’s social media
accounts are exclusively the following:
• City of Oakdale Facebook account at www.facebook.com/cityoakdalemn
• Oakdale Recreation Facebook account at www.facebook.com/oakdalefun
• Oakdale Fire Department Facebook account at www.facebook.com/OakdaleFD
• City of Oakdale Twitter account at www.twitter.com/oakdalemn
• City of Oakdale Instagram account at www.instagram.com/oakdaleminnesota
• City of Oakdale YouTube account at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvlFuTV1kNtQ5pLU4GaV_2w?view_as=su
bscribes
• City of Oakdale LinkedIn account at www.linkedin.com/company/oakdalemn
• City of Oakdale NextDoor account at www.nextdoor.com/city/oakdale--mn
The City reserves the right to shut down any of its social media sites or accounts for
any reason without notice.
The City reserves the right to add more social media accounts as approved.
3.2 The City does not create, collect, disseminate, or regulate use of any other social
media accounts, including the personal accounts of its elected officials and staff.
Questions regarding the scope of this policy should be directed to the City’s
Communications Specialist.
4.0 Definitions
1
4.1 Social media site: an internet site or application where users create and share
content and participate in online communities and conversations in the form of a
page, profile, account, group or other presence. These include, but are not limited to,
blogs, forums, chat sites, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Nextdoor, LinkedIn, Reddit,
and YouTube. This policy includes emerging new web-based platforms general
regarded as social media or having many of the same functions as those listed.
4.2 Covered persons: Covered persons, for purpose of this policy, means all City
representatives, including its employees and other agents of the city, such as
independent contractors, elected officials, and members of City commissions and
boards.
4.3 Social media manager: any authorized city employee or agent with administrator
access who, when posting or responding to a post, appears to be the City social
media account owner.
4.4 Approval: Where “authorized” or “approve” or “approval” or “approved” is referenced
within this policy, the City’s Communications Specialist will review and recommend to
the City Administrator.
5.0 Rules of Use
5.1 The City of Oakdale intends to use social media sites as follows:
• To supplement information from other City communication sources such as the
City’s website
• To disseminate information as quickly as possible, such as emergency
information
• To facilitate two-way communication, promote transparency and social
engagement in local government; and
• To broadcast the City’s messages to the widest possible audience
5.2 City social media managers are responsible for managing City social media sites.
5.3 Facilities or departments wishing to have a new social media presence must initially
submit a request to the Communications Specialist in order to ensure social media
accounts are kept to a sustainable number and policies are followed. All approved
sites will be clearly marked as the City of Oakdale site and will be linked with the
official City website (www.ci.oakdale.mn.us). No one may establish social media
accounts or websites on behalf of the City unless authorized in accordance with this
policy.
5.4 The City’s social media sites must conspicuously display or link to a public notice that
informs the public of the purpose of the social media presence and the terms one
agrees to in accessing, using, or posting to the City’s social media site. (see page 5).
5.5 Administration of all City social media sites will comply with applicable laws,
regulations, and policies as well as proper business etiquette and practices.
2
5.6 The City of Oakdale wishes to establish a positive and informative social media
presence. Covered persons have the responsibility to use the City’s social media sites
in an efficient, effective, ethical, and lawful manner pursuant to all existing City
policies.
5.7 City social media sites covered by this policy will not be used by covered persons for
private or personal purposes or for the purpose of expressing private or personal
views on personal, political, or policy issues or to express personal views or concerns
pertaining to City employment relations matters.
5.8 No City social media site may be used by covered persons to disclose private or
confidential information. No social media site should be used to disclose sensitive
information.
5.9 Outside of situations of disaster, no City social media site will be used for transaction
of City business. In the event a user initiates a request, application, or question
through social media that affects city business or requires another city policy or
process to be followed, that user will be contacted by phone, email, or other channels
as soon as reasonably possible If comments are allowed, in the event of a question
of general interest, a response may be given in comments, the initial post may be
edited, or a subsequent post may be created to include the information.
5.10 City of Oakdale’s social media managers will not edit any posted comments.
However, comments posted by members of the public may be removed if they fall
into at least one of the following categories:
• Obscene or pornographic content
• Direct threats to persons or property
• Material asserted to violate the intellectual property of another person
• Private, personal information about a person published without his/her consent
• Information that compromises a public safety security system
• Statutorily private, confidential, or nonpublic data
• Commercial promotions or spam
• Hyperlinks to material that falls into one of the foregoing categories
5.11 A member of the public whose comment is removed may appeal the removal of the
comment and seek reconsideration of its removal by contacting the City in writing
and explaining how the comment does not fall into one of the categories for removal.
A written response will be provided as soon as reasonably possible.
5.12 A member of the public who disputes the legality of any portion of this policy may
dispute the particular portion in writing. The City should acknowledge the claim
promptly and, upon consultation of the city administrator and city attorney, respond
to the claim concerning legality of the policy portion as soon as reasonably possible
under the circumstances.
3
6.0 Guidelines for Elected Officials
6.1 Elected officials shall not use official City social media sites for campaigning
purposes.
6.2 Elected officials shall not post comments or links to any content that endorses or
opposes political candidates or ballot propositions, including links to an elected
official’s campaign site.
6.3 Elected officials must be mindful that posting content on professional social media
accounts regarding City-related matters could inadvertently result in the violation of
Minnesota Open Meeting Laws if sufficient numbers of other public officials engage
on the post, resulting in a quorum. If this occurs, the online conversation should
immediately cease with no further posts by the officials.
6.4 It is anticipated that from time to time, elected officials will have access to
information that is considered privileged or confidential under Minnesota State
Statutes. Elected officials must not reveal any confidential or privileged information
about the City, its constituents, its employees, or contractors on social media sites.
6.5 It is best practice for elected officials to redistribute (share, retweet, etc.) posts from
the official City social media sites. While not all content and City-related
announcements will be shared on the official City social media sites, it is best
practice to allow City social media managers to create content, answer questions and
manage constructive conversations.
7.0 Data Ownership and Retention
7.1 All communications or messages within social media sites covered by this policy
composed, sent, or received on city or personal equipment are the property of the
City and will be subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. This law
classifies certain information as available to the public upon request. As no
transactions of city business shall be conducted through social media accounts
(outside of disasters), in accordance with the City’s records retention schedule, the
City shall retain all social media messages only until read.
4
PUBLIC NOTICE
City of Oakdale Social Media Disclaimer
The purpose of the City of Oakdale’s social media presence is to provide members of the
community with information. All content of this site is public and is subject to disclosure
pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Please be aware that anything
you post may survive deletion, whether by you or others. Do not post sensitive or personally
identifiable information, such as social security numbers.
Following or tagging persons or organizations is not an endorsement by the City and is only
intended as a means of broadening communication. The City is not responsible for content
found at links to third parties, nor the views or opinions expressed by third-party comments.
Please be advised that comments falling into the following category or categories may be
removed:
• Obscene or pornographic content
• Direct threats to persons or property
• Material asserted to violate the intellectual property of another person
• Private, personal information about a person published without his/her consent
• Information that endangers the public by compromising a public safety security
system
• Statutorily private, confidential, or nonpublic data
• Commercial promotions or spam
• Hyperlinks to material that falls into at least one of the foregoing categories
Should your comment be removed by the City and you believe it does not fall into one of the
above categories, contact the City in writing to explain how the comment does not fall into
one of these categories.
Should you wish to challenge the legality of any portion of this notice or the City’s social
media policy, you may contact the City in writing and explain the basis for the challenge in
detail.
If you have any other questions about the City of Oakdale’s social media sites, contact the
City Communications Specialist at 651-730-2722.
By accessing, using, or posting to this City of Oakdale social media site, you acknowledge
you have been advised of the foregoing.
5
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Christina M. Volkers, City Administrator
Date: April 13, 2021
Subject: Proposed Policy: Donations to Parks, Memorials, Installation, and Maintenance
Per the direction of the City Council, staff drafted a policy relating to donations made to city parks from
the public. The policy also speaks to memorial benches, plaques, trees, and pavers.”). On February 23,
the City Council reviewed the proposed policy and made the following edits:
• Reword Section 2.4 to make less ambiguous.
• Include language to limit the type, total number, and location of memorials.
• Include language to speak to donations for multi-year projects.
• Include language to speak to refunding donations when memorial projects do not proceed.
• Send to Parks and Recreation Commission for input.
The proposed policy with edits from the February 23 council meeting as noted above, was reviewed by
the Parks and Recreation Commission at their March 16 meeting. Attached is a revised proposal with
the Parks and Recreation Commission’s recommended changes and request for adoption by the City
Council.
If the City Council is supportive of the attached draft policy, staff will bring back a request for formal
approval to the April 27 regular meeting; the policy will be listed as a consent item.
Standard Operating Policy
City of Oakdale
Policy Number: MIS-019
Pages: 4
Subject: Donations to Parks; Memorials, Installation, and Maintenance
Approved: 2021
1.0 General
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines, standards, and procedures for the
installation, care, and maintenance for donations to city parks, including signage, kiosks,
wayfinding, public art, trees, equipment, landscaping, and memorials (benches, plaques,
engraved pavers). This policy does not apply to buildings or land.
1.2 The city desires to encourage donations to its parks while at the same time manage aesthetic
impacts and mitigate ongoing maintenance costs.
1.3 The city desires to provide members of the community the opportunity to remember or honor a
loved one by purchasing a bench, tree, or plaque.
1.4 This policy will apply to all donations made after its approved date. Donations made prior to the
adoption of this policy shall be subject to applicable sections of this policy.
2.0 Standards for Donations
2.1 The city and the community share an interest in ensuring the best appearance and aesthetic
quality of its parks. Donations should reflect the character of the city park and be in keeping with
all applicable park master plans and will be installed in such a manner that will not substantially
change the character of a park or its intended use.
2.2 The community has an interest in ensuring that all donations, including memorials, to parks
remain in good repair and the city has an interest in ensuring that the short- and long-term
maintenance costs remain reasonable and does not create an undue or unknown burden to city
parks staff. Donations must be of high quality to ensure a long life, stand up to general use, and
be resistant to the elements and acts of vandalism.
2.3 The city has an interest in ensuring that the donor covers the full cost for the purchase and
installation, where applicable, of their donation. The city also has an interest in ensuring that
on-going maintenance costs do not negatively impact the resources available for said
maintenance. Consequently, a significant factor in the city’s decision whether or not to accept a
proposed donation, including memorials, to a park will be maintenance costs.
2.4 The city cannot accept donations from potential donors who represent a reputational risk to the
city, e.g. individuals or organizations known to be involved in activities that contravene laws or
city values. The city cannot accept donations that are deemed in appropriate or harmful to the
city and shall not be in conflict with any provisions of federal, state, or municipal law.
2.4 The city reserves the right to decline any donations if, upon review, acceptance of the donation is
determined, at the sole discretion of the city, to be not in the best interest of the city.
2.5 The donation shall be the sole property of the City of Oakdale; the donor shall have no legal
interest in the donation. The city may relocate the donation for any reason, including for safety,
maintenance, or redevelopment of park land. The city will make a reasonable effort to notify
donors of any significant change to the amenity; however, it is the donor’s responsibility to keep
their contact information current with the city.
73.0 Memorials
73.1 The following memorials are offered by the city. Cost information is available on the city’s web
site: www.ci.oakdale.mn.us (note URL) or by calling 651-730-2740.
o Bench, Engraved, Concrete Pad
o Tree, Planted, Species as Approved by the City Forester
o Rock with Engraved Plaque
o Engraved Plaque
o Engraved Paver at the Oakdale Veterans Memorial
3.2 The Parks Superintendent shall determine which parks shall allow memorials, the type of
memorial(s) allowed in the parks, the total number of each type of memorial allowed in each
park, and the specific location of memorial(s) allowed in each park. The Parks Superintendent
shall maintain a detailed directory of parks where memorials may be placed, types of memorials
that may be placed, and where memorials have been placed, and type thereof.
34.0 Review and Approval Process
34.1 The Parks Superintendent shall manage and process all donation proposals for city parks with
the following exception: The City Clerk shall manage and process all paver orders for the
Oakdale Veterans Memorial; paver installation shall be provided by the Parks Division.
34.2 The donor shall present a plan to the Parks Superintendent detailing the proposed location(s) for
the donation(s) and maintenance needs,
34.3 The Parks Superintendent shall review all donation requests to ensure that they meet all
donation standards of this policy and other respective city policies. The Parks Superintendent
shall identify the anticipated lifecycle of the donation proposal and whether typical maintenance
costs for the anticipated lifecycle would fall below or above $1,000. Typical maintenance costs
are described as those that can be achieved by Parks Division staff and with equipment and
tools in the possession of the Public Works Department. Proposed donations that will
necessitate any atypical maintenance, such as a perceived difficulty in obtaining or recreating
unique components or replacement parts, or significant staff time will not be approved.
34.4 When typical maintenance costs will likely be at or below $1,000 for the anticipated lifecycle of
the donation, the Parks Superintendent shall provide a written recommendation to the Public
Works Director/City Engineer on whether or not the donation should be accepted by the city.
Recommendations for approving donation requests should detail the item(s) being donated,
proposed location(s), anticipated lifecycle of the donation, and associated maintenance costs.
Recommendations denying donations requests should detail all reason(s) for the denial. The
Public Works Director/City Engineer shall review the recommendation and provide it to the City
Administrator for review/approval.
34.5 When typical maintenance costs will likely be above $1,000 for the anticipated lifecycle of the
donation, the Parks Superintendent shall provide a written recommendation to the Public Works
Director/City Engineer on whether or not the donation should be accepted by the city.
Recommendations for approving donation requests should detail the item(s) being donated,
proposed location(s), anticipated lifecycle of the donation, and associated maintenance costs.
Recommendations denying donations requests should detail all reason(s) for the denial. The
Public Works Director/City Engineer shall review the recommendation and provide it to the City
Administrator. The City Administrator shall review the recommendation and present it to the City
Council for review/approval.
5.0 Donations for Multi-Year Projects or Community Memorials
5.1 When an entity offers to donate to the city a partial monetary donation over pre-determined
number of years in order to realize the completion of a specific project, excluding buildings, and
the review and approval process is complete as documented above, if approved then the city
and the entity shall enter into a written agreement that includes (not all-inclusive):
a. Amount of donation the entity will pay to the city each year.
b. Entity to donate project to the city at completion of project.
c. Entity to release any claims of ownership at completion of project.
d. Steps to be taken if donation isn’t received as anticipated (such as cancellation of
project).
5.2 At such times that the city plans to create a memorial in the community and invites members of
the public to make monetary donations to the city toward said memorial, such donations will be
returned to each donor in the event that a determination is made that the memorial project will
not proceed.
46.0 Ongoing Maintenance
46.1 The Parks Superintendent shall manage the maintenance of all donations placed in city parks,
as approved by the city, by regular and seasonal parks staff.
46.2 In planning projects to be performed by volunteers, the Parks Superintendent shall work with the
city’s Volunteer Coordinator to identify landscaped areas in parks that can be maintained by
volunteers on an ongoing or one-time basis. Projects include weeding, trimming, pruning, and
removal of dead plants.
57.0 Decorating or Adorning Donations
57.1 Decoration or adornment of donated items can interfere with routine maintenance and the
appearance of the donated item. As such, decorations and adornments will be allowed to remain
in place until such time as removed by the Parks Division.
68.0 Removal of Donation
68.1 Donated park items that are living, such as landscaping, flower beds, and trees, become city
property upon planting. If a donated tree or landscaping becomes overgrown, unkempt, diseased
or dies, the city will call for its removal and any associated memorial plaque will be offered to the
donor. It is the responsibility of the donor to keep their contact information current with the
Parks Superintendent.
68.2 Donated park items (ie. benches, plaques, public art, etc.) become city property upon
installation. If a donated park item becomes unserviceable or no longer meets a public need at
its location, the city will call for its removal and any associated memorial plaque will be offered to
the donor. It is the donor’s responsibility to keep their contact information current with the Parks
Superintendent.
9.0 Gifts to the City
9.1 When gifts of real and personal property are offered to the city and staff proposes acceptance,
the City Council must adopt a resolution accepting the gift per Minnesota Statute § Section
465.03, in accordance with any terms prescribed by the donor and agreed to by the City, and
said resolution must receive affirmation by two-thirds of the members of the City Council. A city
may not accept gifts for religious or sectarian purposes.
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Christina M. Volkers, City Administrator
Date: April 13, 2021
Subject: MnDOT Intent to Close 10th Street Entrance
This workshop discussion is a continuation from the March 23, 2021 discussion. MnDOT staff Adam
Josephson, MnDOT Metro East Manager will be in attendance. We have also invited our Washington
County partners to discuss timelines for a signal improvement project in the area.
MNDOT has served us notification of termination of the 1993 Limited Use Permit (LUP) which would close
the private entrance to the new HOM Furniture store, Oakdale KinderCare, and the new planned animal
hospital off 10th Street.
As a result of our last work session, in addition to conversations between our City Attorney and MNDOT
legal counsel, our City Attorney has sent them correspondence identifying our legal analysis of the current
status of the LUP. Relevant documents are attached.
April 5, 2021
Christina Volkers Sent by email only: christina.volkers@ci.oakdale.mn.us
Oakdale City Administrator
1584 Hadley Ave N
Oakdale, MN 55128
Re: Termination of 10th St Temporary Access LUP
Dear Ms. Volkers:
This letter serves as MnDOT’s notice to the City of Oakdale of the termination of the 1993 Limited Use Permit
(LUP) that allows the city to construct, maintain and operate a temporary entrance to 10th Street North (CSAH
10) directly across from the easterly Trunk Highway 694 entrance/exit ramp terminal through a controlled
access area.
Special Provision 12 of the LUP provides that the use of the right of way permitted by the LUP shall remain
subordinate to the right of MnDOT to use the property for any highway or transportation purpose. MnDOT has
determined that removal of this temporary driveway access is necessary to restore the controlled access in this
location and improve the operations and safety of the east ramp intersection.
Special Provision 13 of the LUP requires the City to remove the access at City cost when a contract is awarded
for the construction of the Trunk Highway 694 northbound ramp. Because MnDOT has no plans to construct the
ramp at this time, MnDOT will make arrangements for the access removal and cover the construction costs
associated with the removal of the access within the MnDOT R/W. MnDOT will not remove any portion of the
driveway between the State R/W and the current parking lot, which is a distance of approximately 350 feet.
Should the City or the developer decide to remove the improvements in this area, those costs will be at City or
developer expense.
If you have any questions about this notice please contact Adam Josephson, MnDOT East Area Manager.
Sincerely,
Michael Barnes
MnDOT Metro District Engineer
Attached – 1993 Limited Use Permit
CC: Adam Josephson, MnDOT
Wayne Sandberg, Washington County
Equal Opportunity Employer
Minneapolis 150 South Fifth Street
Suite 700
Saint Paul Minneapolis, MN 55402
St. Cloud (612) 337-9300 telephone
(612) 337-9310 fax
www.kennedy-graven.com
Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity
Employer
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
JAMES J. THOMSON
Attorney at Law
Direct Dial: (612) 337-9209
Email: jthomson@kennedy-graven.com
April 8, 2021
Jennifer Juneau
Deputy Chief Counsel By U.S. Mail and Email
Minnesota Department of Transportation
395 John Ireland Blvd
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55155
RE: City of Oakdale - Termination of 10th Street Access Limited Use Permit
Dear Ms. Juneau:
I am the city attorney for the City of Oakdale. I received your contact information from Danielle
Holder, the right of way attorney for MnDOT’s metro district. I recently contacted Ms. Holder to
discuss a Limited Use Permit (“LUP”) that MnDOT issued to the City in October 1993. I am
enclosing a copy of the LUP.
The LUP granted the City the right to construct, maintain, and operate an entrance to 10th Street
North directly across from the easterly Trunk Highway 694 entrance/exit ramp. Pursuant to
Paragraph 13 of the LUP, the City agreed to close the entrance when MnDOT awarded a contract
for the construction of a northbound ramp onto Highway 694. MnDOT has not awarded a contract
for the construction of such a ramp.
I am also enclosing a copy of an April 5, 2021 letter from Michael Barnes, MnDOT’s Metro
District Engineer, to Christina Volkers, the Oakdale City Administrator. The letter notifies the
City of MnDOT’s intention to terminate the LUP. In his letter, Mr. Barnes acknowledges that
MnDOT has no current plans to construct the ramp referenced in Paragraph 13 of the
LUP. Nevertheless, Mr. Barnes contends that Paragraph 12 of the LUP gives MnDOT the right to
terminate the LUP. The City disagrees with Mr. Barnes’ contention.
Paragraph 12 of the LUP states, in part, as follows: “Any use of the existing State right of way
permitted by this permit shall remain subordinate to the right of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation to use the property for any highway or transportation purpose.” The “property”
referenced in that provision is MnDOT’s “controlled access area and right of way” referred to in
the opening paragraph of the LUP. Mr. Barnes makes no reference to any proposed use by
Jennifer Juneau
April 8, 2021
Page Two
MnDOT of either its controlled access area or its right of way for Highway 694. Rather, Mr.
Barnes simply states that MnDOT’s reason for desiring to terminate the LUP is to “improve the
operations and safety of the east ramp intersection.” That reason is not a sufficient basis to
terminate the LUP because it does not involve MnDOT’s use of the controlled access area or
MnDOT’s use of the right of way for Highway 694.
In summary, MnDOT’s reason for desiring to terminate the LUP is legally insufficient. The City’s
position is that MnDOT’s notice of termination is therefore invalid.
I look forward to your response to my letter.
Sincerely,
/s/ James J. Thomson
James J. Thomson
cc: Mayor and City Council
Christina Volkers
Get email alerts for Oakdale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.