City Council Workshop
Regular MeetingOakdale, MN · August 24, 2021
Minutes
WORKSHOP
OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
August 24, 2021
The City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, August 24, 2021, at Oakdale City Hall, 1584 Hadley
Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota. The meeting began at 5 PM.
Present: Mayor Paul Reinke
Council Members: Jake Ingebrigtson
Susan Olson
Colleen Swedberg
Kevin Zabel
Also Present: Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Brian Bachmeier, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Susan Barry, City Clerk
Nick Newton, Police Captain
Kevin Wold, Fire Chief
Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director
Lori Pulkrabek, Ramsey Washington Counties Cable Commission
SUBURBAN COMMUNITY CHANNEL SERVICES UPDATE
Cable Commission Chair Lori Pulkrabek provided an overview of services provided by Suburban
Community Channels, including programming, production, technical support, funding, and
planned changes.
In response to a question from Council Member Zabel, Cable Commissioner Pulkrabek noted that
the commission has been broadcasting ISD 622 sporting events and is considering asking the
district to contribute toward production costs. She further noted that she would let the City
Council know the percentage of programming that is school related.
Council Member Zabel commented on equipment and staff time needed for sporting events and
that other member cities do not cover school district events.
In response to a question from Mayor Reinke, Cable Commissioner Pulkrabek noted that cable
staff is always seeking ideas to create local programming.
Council Member Swedberg suggested stories on Oakdale businesses, parks, and events.
Cable Commissioner Pulkrabek commented that funds would be available to Oakdale to equip the
Hadley Room for cablecasting and/or virtual meetings. She further commented that because the
commission now receives less revenue due to the decline in cable subscribers, a request may be
brought before the Legislature that would allow the commission to obtain fees from streaming
services. Cable Commissioner Pulkrabek also commented that city administrators and
communications staff from member cities planned to establish an advisory board to assist the
commission.
WORKSHOP
August 24, 2021
Page Two
In response to a question from Council Member Zabel, Cable Commissioner Pulkrabek indicated
that the commission is considering inviting cities and school districts to become members.
2022 BUDGET
Finance Director Zimmerman provided another overview of the proposed 2022 Budget and Levy.
The City Council briefly discussed funds needed for pay and compensation study adjustments.
The City Council reviewed options for setting the preliminary levy for 2022 and discussed setting it
at eight percent.
Mayor Reinke noted that adopted levies have historically been less than preliminary levies.
Council Member Olson commented on how residents would view the proposed levy when
comparing it with those of other communities.
Finance Director Zimmerman noted that most property owners focus on the rate for their
individual property.
Finance Director Zimmerman stated that staff would get loan quotes from local banks for the City
Council to consider in lieu of selling bonds to purchase equipment as the city has one for many
years.
In response to a comment from Council Member Ingebrigtson, City Administrator Volkers indicated
that Finance Director Zimmerman would prepare a unified message on the proposed levy for the
City Council to use.
Council Member Olson supported a proposed levy of 7.56 percent.
The City Council and staff discussed potential expenditure reductions, American Rescue Funds
and remaining CARES funds, city issued loans, and using fund balances.
Staff was asked to offer ways to bring the proposed levy amount under six percent ideally by using
the one-time CARES funds and reducing the amount for Community Development and the pay and
compensation study.
COUNCIL DAIS SECURITY UPGRADES
Police Captain Newton provided an overview of increasing security measures in the Council
Chambers by adding ballistic panels to the existing dais at an estimated cost of $25,000. He also
talked about ways to increase security of the glass at the back of the Chambers.
The City Council supported taking action on the dais security panels on September 14.
WORKSHOP
August 24, 2021
Page Three
EDC INTERVIEW: Boullianne
The City Council interviewed Bob Boullianne to fill one of two vacancies on the Economic
Development Commission.
PROPOSED CODE: CHAPTER 13 – TEMPORARY STORAGE
The City Council continued their review of a request to consider adopting regulations relating to
portable, on-demand storage devices; the version reflected changes requested by the City Council
on August 10. The City Council supported bringing back the ordinance on September 14 for
formal adoption, with the removal of (f) from Section 13.-25: Container must be clearly labeled
with the name and telephone number of the container owner.
Council Member Ingebrigtson indicated that he would not support adoption of the ordinance as he
did not think that storage pods need to be regulated.
COUNCIL TOPICS
Advisory Body Recognition
Council Member Swedberg asked that staff survey advisory body members on their preference of
having the annual recognition dinner or receiving gift cards for 2021.
The City Council commented that they liked meeting with all advisory boards and commissions the
same evening earlier this year rather than scheduling them at different times.
Annual Buckthorn Removal Event
Council Member Swedberg asked that staff provide options on holding the annual buckthorn
removal event, typically held in the fall so that it would not need to be canceled.
Jane Klein Memorial
Council Member Swedberg noted that she would be presenting five options for recognizing former
Tree Board and Parks and Recreation Commission member Jane Klein.
Walton Park Skate Park
Council Member Ingebrigtson commented on the need for immediate repairs to be made at the
Walton Park Skate Park.
Advisory Body Attendance
WORKSHOP
August 24, 2021
Page Four
Council Member Zabel inquired whether the process to address non-attendance of advisory body
members should be for the council liaison to speak to the member.
Mayor Reinke confirmed that to be the process.
City Administrator Volkers added that the next step would be for the City Council to remove
commission members.
Greenway Station Walkway
In response to a question from Council Member Olson, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Bachmeier explained that the Greenway Station walkway was listed in the 2024 Capital
Improvement Program and that moving it up on the schedule could jeopardize the city’s grant
application.
ADJOURNMENT
The workshop adjourned at 6:52 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan Barry,
City Clerk
Agenda
AGENDA
OF City Council Workshop
OAKDALE
Workshop
August 24, 2021
Hadley Room
5:00 PM Suburban Community Channel Services
5:30 PM 2022 Budget
6:15 PM Council Dais Security Upgrades
6:30 PM EDC Interview: Boullianne
6:40 PM Discuss EDC Interview
6:45 PM Proposed Code: Chapter 13 – Temporary Storage
6:55 PM Recess for Regular Meeting
Continued following regular meeting:
Council Topics (15 minutes)
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Christina M. Volkers, City Administrator
Date: August 24 2021
Subject: Suburban Community Channels (SCC)
At Tuesday’s workshop, the City’s representative to and chair of the Ramsey-Washington Suburban
Cable Commission, Lori Pulkrabek, will give an update on services SCC provides to Oakdale and share
updates on the status of happenings at SCC. This update is per the City’s agreement with the Cable
Commission.
8/19/2021
SUBURBAN COMMUNITY
CHANNEL SERVICES
~OAKDALE
Administration &
Enforcement of Franchise
Coordination of administration, enforcement,
and renewal of franchise.
Implementation of Federal regulations as
applicable.
Customer/citizen complaint intervention.
~
OAKDALE
1
8/19/2021
Technical Support for
Community Cable Television
Technical Support Government Channel,
Online VOD, Interconnection Programming
and Council Video System and Related Video
Transport.
Production & Programming
of Local Cable Programming
Oakdale-Specific Programming: Oakdale Update
(monthly), OACC, Oakdale Concerts (Richard Walton Park
Band Shell), other
Coverage of Community Events, Schools, Tartan/District
622 sports, schools arts, music
Regional Programming: Retransmission of School Board
Meetings, Washington County Board meetings, other
2
8/19/2021
Grant Funding for Council
Telecasting System at City Hall
Grant funding from the Commission helped
provide Council Chambers telecasting
replacement in 2016, plus equipment for
conference room/mobile broadcasts by the
City.
Reimbursement Funding for Labor Cost for
Council/Public Meeting Telecasts
The City submits claims for its labor expenses
associated with its Council/public meeting
telecasts which are then reimbursed by the
Commission.
3
8/19/2021
RWSCC – The Next Generation
• Recent Changes
• New SCC Advisory Group to include City Administrator and
Communications Specialist from Oakdale
• Next SCC/Commission:
• Operations Evaluation
• Revenue Options
~
OAKDALE
Oakdale Thoughts
Revenue Generation Expense Reduction Grant Funding Franchise Fees
Sell production Coverage of Ongoing? Future projections?
services Community Events
Estimates?
Oakdale specific School Coverage
advertising during
• Sports
Oakdale
programming • Arts
Other? • Music
4
8/19/2021
COUNCIL THOUGHTS?
5
~ COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
OAKDALE
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director
Date: August 24, 2021
Subject: 2022 Budget
At the June 22, 2021 City Council Work Session, staff outlined the tentative budget timeline. At the July
13, July 27, and August 10 work sessions, the draft preliminary budget and tax levy were discussed.
Direction Requested
At the September 14 City Council meeting staff will present the preliminary levy for Council
consideration. In order to prepare for this presentation staff is seeking Council direction on the
appropriate preliminary tax levy to support city operations in 2022. Early feedback has primarily been
around the inclusion/exclusion (Scenarios 5 and 6 in the enclosed attchments) of a placeholder for the
classification and compensation study. Note that the final levy set in December may not exceed the
preliminary levy which is set in September.
As we continue this process, the following budgetary principles will serve as a guide:
• Budget decisions to consider and acknowledge both the short and long-term impacts
• Stabilize revenues and expenditures, and eliminate unanticipated variances
• Fund operations at a level to provide quality services at a reasonable cost
• Maintain structural balance and appropriate fund balance levels
• Consider additional investments when they help achieve City goals and provide a significant
return to the community
• Seek to make a connection between resources and results
The updated draft budget is being presented to continue the dialog about the use of City resources and
the alignment of these resources with current initiatives. Because this planning document is being
prepared in early August, many assumptions continue to be been made based on trends in prior year
financial performance. Several factors may impact the final budget, including legislative changes, state
mandates, economic shifts, union negotiations, final classification and compensation plan review, and
funding from the American Rescue Plan Act. Assessed values for taxes payable 2022 are not final, but
estimated figures have been provided by the Washington County Property Tax Department for
preliminary tax calculations.
Primary Levy Drivers
• Public Safety positions
o Full year cost of two firefighter positions (hired mid-year 2021)
o Three firefighter positions (two in the Fire Department paid for by the levy and one in the
Ambulance Fund paid for by ambulance fees)
o New Police Officer (Investigator) position
• Creation of Public Safety Wellness program
• Cost of living, merit, and insurance adjustments for applicable employees
• Reduction of transfers into the General Fund from other funds
• Decreased interest income due to suppressed interest rate environment
Classification and Compensation Study
Consistent with the August 10 City Council work session presentation, $325,000 has been incorporated
into scenario’s 3 and 4 of the attachments. This figure was recommended as a general guideline by the
independent consultant providing the analysis, based on the average outcome of studies completed for
other local government entities. It is also important to note that including funds for market adjustments
is preferred financial management given they are not one time costs, but ongoing costs.
City Levy
The following preliminary tax calculations are listed below to provide a frame of reference regarding the
impact to the median value residential property within the City. These calculations are also within the
attached document titled Tax Capacity Rate Calculation. As a reminder, assessed values are not final.
• The preliminary increase in market values is estimated to generate an additional $586,928 of
levy funding or a 4.34% increase.
• Scenario 5 (Including Classification & Compensation): At a tax capacity rate of 40.625% - or a
4.65% increase from 2021, approximately $1,148,625 of additional levy funding would be
generated, or a tax levy increase of 8.49%. This is reflected in Scenario 5 of Attachments 1 & 2.
o At this levy amount the median residential property in Oakdale of $264,300, that
experienced a 2.0% increase in value, is estimated to see the City share of their property
tax bill increase by $67.37 or 7.08% for 2022.
• Scenario 6 (Without Classification & Compensation): At a tax capacity rate of 39.581% - or a
1.96% increase from 2021, approximately $823,625 of additional levy funding would be
generated, or a tax levy increase of 6.09%. This is reflected in Scenario 6 of Attachments 1 & 2.
o At this levy amount the median residential property in Oakdale of $264,300, that
experienced a 2.0% increase in value, is estimated to see the City share of their property
tax bill increase by $41.20 or 4.33% for 2022.
Remaining Budget Calendar
• September 14th City Council Meeting:
o City Council certifies 2022 Proposed Property Tax Levy and sets the date for the Truth-in-
Taxation meeting to adopt the final 2022 Budgets and Property Tax Levy
• Mid-November
o Proposed Property Tax (Truth in Taxation) notices sent by County to all property owners.
• December 14th City Council Meeting:
o Finance presents at the annual Truth in Taxation meeting. City Council adopts 2022
Budget, 2022 Tax Levy and 2022-2026 Equipment and Capital Improvement Program
(CIP).
Attachments
• Property Taxes – City Portion Only
• Tax Capacity Rate Calculation
• Levy Page – Scenario 5 (Including Classification and Compensation)
• Levy Page – Scenario 6 (Excluding Classification and Compensation)
Attachment 1
City of Oakdale, Minnesota
Draft Preliminary 2022 Property Taxes for Median Value Residential Property as of August 24, 2021 (City Portion Only)
(5)
(4) 2022 Council
(1) 2022 Class and Action to Reduce (6)
2022 Growth in (2) (3) Compensation Levy - $440,000 Levy Reduction
Tax Base - Flat 2022 Public 2022 Operating Adjustments - Reallocated + Without Class and
Pay Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Tax Capacity Rate Safety Positions Adjustments $325,000 $60,000 Transfer Compensation
Market Value 157,400 169,600 193,400 196,500 203,600 216,400 231,700 252,800 259,000 264,300 264,300 264,300 264,300 264,300 264,300
Market Value Exclusion (23,074) (21,976) (19,834) (19,555) (18,916) (17,764) (16,387) (14,488) (13,930) (13,453) (13,453) (13,453) (13,453) (13,453) (13,453)
Taxable Market Value 134,326 147,624 173,566 176,945 184,684 198,636 215,313 238,312 245,070 250,847 250,847 250,847 250,847 250,847 250,847
Tax Capacity 1,343 1,476 1,736 1,769 1,847 1,986 2,153 2,383 2,451 2,508 2,508 2,508 2,508 2,508 2,508
Tax Capacity Rates:
City 44.065% 41.201% 39.131% 39.492% 39.721% 38.544% 39.227% 37.617% 38.821% 38.821% 40.065% 41.187% 42.230% 40.625% 39.581%
Market Value Rates:
City Referendum 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Property Taxes:
City $ 592 $ 608 $ 679 $ 699 $ 734 $ 765 $ 845 $ 896 $ 951 $ 974 $ 1,005 $ 1,033 $ 1,059 $ 1,019 $ 993
City Referendum $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total $ 592 $ 608 $ 679 $ 699 $ 734 $ 765 $ 845 $ 896 $ 951 $ 974 $ 1,005 $ 1,033 $ 1,059 $ 1,019 $ 993
Value Increase (P'13 to P'21) = 64.5%
Tax Capacity Rate Decrease (P'13 to P'21) = 11.9%
Draft 8/24/2021
Attachment 2
City of Oakdale, Minnesota
Draft Preliminary 2022 Tax Capacity Rate Calculation as of August 24, 2021 (City Portion Only)
(5)
(1) (4) 2022 Council (6)
2022 Growth in 2022 Class and Action to Reduce Levy Reduction
Tax Base - Flat (2) (3) Compensation Levy -$440,000 Without Class
Tax Capacity 2022 Public 2022 Operating Adjustments - Reallocated + and
Pay Year 2013 Final 2014 Final 2015 Final 2016 Final 2017 Final 2018 Final 2019 Final 2020 Final 2021 Final Rate Safety Positions Adjustments $325,000 $60,000 Transfer Compensation
A. TAXABLE VALUATIONS:
A1. Real Estate 22,638,702 23,715,337 25,578,988 26,067,811 26,623,495 28,655,215 30,666,108 33,127,365 34,563,288 36,037,450 36,037,450 36,037,450 36,037,450 36,037,450 36,037,450
A2. Personal Property 392,448 403,526 413,612 426,504 447,982 475,738 464,188 467,862 510,346 510,566 510,566 510,566 510,566 510,566 510,566
A3. Values in the City of Oakdale 23,031,150 24,118,863 25,992,600 26,494,315 27,071,477 29,130,953 31,130,296 33,595,227 35,073,634 36,548,016 36,548,016 36,548,016 36,548,016 36,548,016 36,548,016
A4. Fiscal Disparity Contribution (3,674,393) (3,278,757) (3,353,639) (3,373,989) (3,353,013) (2,575,643) (3,529,581) (3,575,253) (3,880,464) (4,138,694) (4,138,694) (4,138,694) (4,138,694) (4,138,694) (4,138,694)
A5. Tax Increment Financing Districts (515,994) (521,027) (565,082) (707,661) (820,007) (1,006,187) (1,096,429) (1,208,265) (1,234,695) (1,272,888) (1,272,888) (1,272,888) (1,272,888) (1,272,888) (1,272,888)
A6. Values after FD and TIF 18,840,763 20,319,079 22,073,879 22,412,665 22,898,457 25,549,123 26,504,286 28,811,709 29,958,475 31,136,434 31,136,434 31,136,434 31,136,434 31,136,434 31,136,434
A7. Fiscal Disparity Distribution 4,018,310 3,896,687 3,962,763 4,249,897 4,393,092 4,525,412 4,795,549 5,086,664 5,058,774 5,235,831 5,235,831 5,235,831 5,235,831 5,235,831 5,235,831
A8. Value after Fiscal Disparity Sharing 22,859,073 24,215,766 26,036,642 26,662,562 27,291,549 30,074,535 31,299,835 33,898,373 35,017,249 36,372,265 36,372,265 36,372,265 36,372,265 36,372,265 36,372,265
B. TAX DOLLARS
B1. Fiscal Disparity Adjustment 1,577,267 1,717,074 1,632,691 1,663,047 1,734,899 1,797,555 1,848,404 1,995,347 1,902,942 2,032,580 2,032,580 2,032,580 2,032,580 2,032,580 2,032,580
B2. Oakdale Taxpayer Levy 8,302,177 8,371,630 8,637,831 8,851,102 9,095,577 9,847,694 10,396,891 10,838,004 11,630,054 12,087,344 12,474,844 12,824,041 13,149,041 12,649,041 12,324,041
B3. Total Tax Levy 9,879,444 10,088,704 10,270,522 10,514,149 10,830,476 11,645,249 12,245,295 12,833,351 13,532,996 14,119,924 14,507,424 14,856,621 15,181,621 14,681,621 14,356,621
B4. Levy Change From Prior Year ($) 209,260 181,818 243,627 316,327 814,773 600,046 588,056 699,645 586,928 974,428 1,323,625 1,648,625 1,148,625 823,625
B5. Levy Change From Prior Year (%) 2.12% 1.80% 2.37% 3.01% 7.52% 5.15% 4.80% 5.45% 4.34% 7.20% 9.78% 12.18% 8.49% 6.09%
B6. Levy Increase/(Decrease) over Market Value Growth (%) -5.89% -4.53% 0.79% 0.50% -2.78% 1.55% -3.79% 2.81% 0.00% 2.86% 5.44% 7.85% 4.15% 1.75%
C. TAX RATES
C1. Fiscal Disparity Adjustment (B1/A7) 39.252% 44.065% 41.201% 39.131% 39.492% 39.721% 38.544% 39.227% 37.617% 38.821% 38.821% 38.821% 38.821% 38.821% 38.821%
C2. Oakdale Tax Capacity Levy (B2/A6) 44.065% 41.201% 39.131% 39.492% 39.721% 38.544% 39.227% 37.617% 38.821% 38.821% 40.065% 41.187% 42.230% 40.625% 39.581%
C3. Oakdale Tax Capacity Change from Prior Year (%) -6.500% -5.023% 0.920% 0.582% -2.964% 1.772% -4.106% 3.200% 0.000% 3.206% 6.095% 8.784% 4.647% 1.958%
Draft 8/24/2021
Attachment 3
2022 Proposed Levy (DRAFT 8-24-2021)
Scenario 5
Estimated Tax Capacity Rate = 40.625%
2022 Levy Increase of $1,148,625 or 8.49% from 2021
General Fund Revenues
Property Tax Revenue 11,001,479
LGA 262,721
Other Revenue Sources 4,551,683
Total General Fund Revenues 15,815,883
Designated Budgets
CIP 200,000
Park CIP 100,000
Economic Development 55,000
Public Building Fund -
Public Safety / Fire & Ambulance 300,000
Vehicle & Equipment Replacement
Total Designated Budgets
5
820,000
165,000
Bonds of 2011B
io
General Obligation Bonds
185,000
Bonds of 2012A
Bonds of 2013A
Bonds of 2014B
na r
150,942
146,788
153,734
Bonds of 2015A 137,641
Bonds of 2015C
Bonds of 2016A
Bonds of 2017A
Bonds of 2018A
Sc e
187,655
99,821
172,416
56,552
Bonds of 2019A 217,943
Bonds of 2020A 217,692
Bonds of 2021A ft GO Bond Subtotal 1,869,394
143,210
ra Certificates of Indebtedness
D
Certificates of 2017B
Certificates of 2018B
Certificates of 2019B
224,910
231,263
206,850
Certificates of 2020B 172,725
Loan of 2021/22 - Fire Engine* 155,000
Certificate Subtotal 990,748
Total Debt Service Budgets 2,860,142
2022 Proposed Levy (DRAFT8-24-2021) Scenario 5
General Fund Budget 75% 11,001,479
Designated Budgets 6% 820,000
Debt Service Budgets 19% 2,860,142
2022 Proposed Levy (DRAFT) 100% 14,681,621
*Estimated Levy Requirement for a 5 year loan
Attachment 4
2022 Proposed Levy (DRAFT 8-24-2021)
Scenario 6
Estimated Tax Capacity Rate = 39.581%
2022 Levy Increase of $823,625 or 6.09% from 2021
General Fund Revenues
Property Tax Revenue 10,676,479
LGA 262,721
Other Revenue Sources 4,551,683
Total General Fund Revenues 15,490,883
Designated Budgets
CIP 200,000
Park CIP 100,000
Economic Development 55,000
Public Building Fund -
Public Safety / Fire & Ambulance 300,000
Vehicle & Equipment Replacement
Total Designated Budgets
6
820,000
165,000
Bonds of 2011B
io
General Obligation Bonds
185,000
Bonds of 2012A
Bonds of 2013A
Bonds of 2014B
na r 150,942
146,788
153,734
Bonds of 2015A 137,641
Bonds of 2015C
Bonds of 2016A
Bonds of 2017A
Bonds of 2018A
Sc e
187,655
99,821
172,416
56,552
Bonds of 2019A 217,943
Bonds of 2020A 217,692
Bonds of 2021A
ft 143,210
ra GO Bond Subtotal 1,869,394
Certificates of Indebtedness
D
Certificates of 2017B
Certificates of 2018B
Certificates of 2019B
224,910
231,263
206,850
Certificates of 2020B 172,725
Loan of 2021/22 - Fire Engine* 155,000
Certificate Subtotal 990,748
Total Debt Service Budgets 2,860,142
2022 Proposed Levy (DRAFT8-24-2021) Scenario 6
General Fund Budget 74% 10,676,479
Designated Budgets 6% 820,000
Debt Service Budgets 20% 2,860,142
2022 Proposed Levy (DRAFT) 100% 14,356,621
*Estimated Levy Requirement for a 5 year loan
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To Mayor and City Council
Through Nicholas Newton, Police Captain
Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Date August 24 2021
Subject Council Chambers Dais Upgrades
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to council workshop discussion, the Police Department inquired with potential vendors for
providing quotes on increasing security measures in the Council Chambers by adding ballistic panels to
the dais. There are limited contractors that perform this type of work that are aesthetically acceptable.
SafeWood Designs of Fridley, Minnesota, was identified as a company that could install the ballistic
panels on the dais in an aesthetically pleasing manner. SafeWood Designs physically surveyed the
Council Chambers and dais. SafeWood Designs provided an initial quote and later revised the quote.
Sun Control was the other vendor that responded to the request for a quote as they offer ballistic
material work. After physically inspecting the Council Chambers, the company reported the work
requested was out of their purview and recommended SafeWood Designs.
SafeWood Designs is known as reputable company that does quality work. SafeWood Designs has
installed ballistic panels in city council chambers around the metropolitan area. Most recently,
SafeWood Designs completed security upgrades for the City of Minnetonka.
Attached please find two quotes. Attachment A is the original proposal and provides some basic
information about the company and photos of work they have completed. Attachment B is the revised
(lower) quote with adjusted pricing.
In summary of the quotes:
• Bullet proof resistant Panels for dais $25,280
• Window infill ballistic material (optional) $ 3,660
• Bullet proof wood cap above dais (optional) $ 3,440
As proposed, total cost for entire package above is $32,380.
The cost of only adding bullet proof panels to the dais is $25,280.
Staff is looking for direction on intent from the City Council regarding whether to move forward with this
initiative.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Original Quote
B. Revised Quote
PROPOSAL
Thank you for choosing SafeWood Designs to provide pricing for your project.
We established SafeWood Designs because our changing world means that safety and security
needs are increasing. Gun violence is a very real threat to our schools, homes, places of worship,
offices, and businesses.
SafeWood Designs has a clear mission:
Enhance the safety and security in all the places you live, work, worship and play. Our experience and
craftsmanship allow us to provide extraordinary protection at key thresholds without compromising
the current structure or interior decor.
In addition to our almost endless ability to create your custom built vision, we have created a
modular, cost effective system that is based on years of building custom solutions that integrate
bullet resistant products. Our doors, wall panels, windows, hardware systems, and furniture
seamlessly integrate with existing building structures and features to increase safety and security.
What sets SafeWood Designs apart?
Steel and aluminum feel cold and cause a space to be uninviting. We create beautifully crafted
products with modern patented protections to maintain warm and inviting spaces. Our years of old
world craftsmanship allow us to bring your vision to fruition.
What can you expect from us?
Confidentially, trust and product performance are paramount in security analysis and protective
solution deployment. At SafeWood Designs, we protect your security designs, personal information,
and recognized or perceived threats by keeping them 100% confidential. Vendors and suppliers are
never given project information in any fashion that could trace the materials used to your project. In
addition, you will have direct access to your project manager day or night throughout the course of
your project.
As we move forward, our physical security experts are ready to answer any questions and help you
secure your space in an insecure world. We look forward to working with you.
SafeWood Designs, Inc.
SafeWoodDesigns.com • sales@safewooddesigns.com • 844-896-1800
SECURITY UPGRADES
BULLET RESISTANT RETROFITTING
Retrofit for Safety
Easily transform your existing desks with ballistic
protection. When seconds matter, the addition of
our decorative or concealed bullet resistant
paneling offer an immediate layer of protection.
. wall panel
gallist1C
> Advantages
• Complimentary security analysis
• Can use existing desks
• Decorative transformation/renewal of older desks
• Cost-effective
• Discreet
• Protection up to UL Level 8
• Shorter construction timelines
• Less disruptive than new installations
• Less trades to coordinate with
• Ease of install (can sometimes be done by facility staff)
> Easy Process
• Measure the desk you wish to retrofit
• Send the measurements and drawings to SafeWood
• Our drafter will draw out the components of the retrofit
• Confirm the drafted drawing and measurements SafeWoodDesigns.com
• Panels are cut to size sales@safewooddesigns.com
• Panels are shipped for easy face-screw installation 844-896-1800
Quote Name Oakdale City Hall Dais
Bill To Name City of Oakdale, MN
Quote Number 00001011
Created Date 6/10/2021
Expiration Date 12/31/2021
Terms: 50% Down, 50% on Delivery
(1% Discount for 100% Prepayment)
Quoted Items
Sales
Product Line Item Description Quantity Total Price
Price
Red Oak UL752 Level 8 Bullet Resistant Panels for inside Dais (UL752 Level 3 Option:
UL8 Desk 1.00 $28,090.00 $28,090.00
Deduct $3,370)
UL3 Infill
UL752 Level 3 Window Infills with Forbo and Black Mel (Optional Add if requested) 1.00 $4,030.00 $4,030.00
Panel
UL3 Batten Red Oak Bullet Resistant backsplash panels on top of desk with radiused wood cap (Optional
1.00 $3,810.00 $3,810.00
Strip if requested)
*Project *Material & Installation included - *Assumes tax exempt project - *Includes delivery to
1.00 $0.00 $0.00
Notes Oakdale, MN - *Quote good through Dec 31, 2021
Totals
Subtotal $35,930.00
Grand Total $35,930.00
Terms and Conditions
1. Price is based on the above detailed scope and this document will become part of any signed purchase order or contract.
2. We will initiate a project when we have a letter of intent, purchase order, or signed contract that acknowledges and incorporates our terms and conditions.
4. Our pricing includes one electronic set of first submittal shop drawings and one electronic set of re-submittal drawings for the project described herein.
5. Shop drawings will be based on architectural drawings in an effort to maintain the design intent.
6. Approved shop drawings take precedence over the bid specifications and architectural drawings.
7. We will not be held responsible for any liquidated damages.
8. Standard Warranty is one year from date of product delivery.
9. Unforeseen complications or circumstances encountered during demo or installation may require a change order for work and/or products needed.
BID ACCEPTANCE
________________________________ ____________________________ _________________ ________________
Signature Name Title Date
Sales@safewooddesigns.com Phone (844) 896-1800 7281 Commerce Circle W., Fridley, MN 55432
Quote Name Oakdale City Hall Dais
Bill To Name City of Oakdale, MN
Quote Number 00001011
Created Date 7/23/2021
Expiration Date 12/31/2021
Terms: 50% Down, 50% on Delivery
(1% Discount for 100% Prepayment)
Quoted Items
Sales
Product Line Item Description Quantity Total Price
Price
UL8 Red Oak UL752 Level 8 Bullet Resistant Panels for inside Dais (UL752 Level 3 Option: Deduct
1.00 $25,280.00 $25,280.00
Desk $3,690) (Option to change Red Oak back panel to Black PLam panel: Deduct $910)
UL3 Infill
UL752 Level 3 Window Infills with Forbo and Black Mel (Optional Add if requested) 1.00 $3,660.00 $3,660.00
Panel
UL3
Red Oak Bullet Resistant backsplash panels on top of desk with radiused wood cap (Optional if
Batten 1.00 $3,440.00 $3,440.00
requested)
Strip
*Project *Material & Installation included - *Assumes tax exempt project - *Includes delivery to Oakdale,
1.00 $0.00 $0.00
Notes MN - *Quote good for acceptance through July 30th
Totals
Subtotal $32,380.00
Grand Total $32,380.00
Terms and Conditions
1. Price is based on the above detailed scope and this document will become part of any signed purchase order or contract.
2. We will initiate a project when we have a letter of intent, purchase order, or signed contract that acknowledges and incorporates our terms and conditions.
4. Our pricing includes one electronic set of first submittal shop drawings and one electronic set of re-submittal drawings for the project described herein.
5. Shop drawings will be based on architectural drawings in an effort to maintain the design intent.
6. Approved shop drawings take precedence over the bid specifications and architectural drawings.
7. We will not be held responsible for any liquidated damages.
8. Standard Warranty is one year from date of product delivery.
9. Unforeseen complications or circumstances encountered during demo or installation may require a change order for work and/or products needed.
BID ACCEPTANCE
________________________________ ____________________________ _________________ ________________
Signature Name Title Date
Sales@safewooddesigns.com Phone (844) 896-1800 7281 Commerce Circle W., Fridley, MN 55432
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
OAKDALE
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Date: August 24 2021
Subject: Interview: Economic Development Commission Candidate
At the August 24 work session, the City Council will interview a person interested in serving on the
Economic Development Commission (EDC). The EDC currently has two vacancies. Community
Development staff interviewed the applicant.
Application provided to the City Council under separate cover.
Interview Schedule:
6:30 PM Bob Boullianne
Time will be allotted for the City Council to discuss the interview and a formal request to make an
appointment will be considered the same evening at the August 24 regular City Council meeting.
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Christina M. Volkers, City Administrator
Date: August 24 2021
Subject: Proposed Code Amendment: Chapter 13, Offenses-Miscellaneous – Temporary Storage
At their August 10 work session, the City Council reviewed a proposed ordinance amendment to
Chapter 13 of the City Code to provide regulations relating to portable, on-demand storage devices,
commonly known as PODS. The City Council asked that the new code have a self-service registration
component associated with it. As such, Section 13-26 has been added to the proposed code and
registration application has been developed for the web page.
A final review of the proposed and revised ordinance will be discussed.
If the City Council is supportive of the attached code amendment to Chapter 13, it is asked that the City
Council direct staff to post the proposed ordinance on the city’s web page, as required, and bring forth
an ordinance amendment to a public hearing at the September 14, 2021, City Council regular meeting.
Attachments
Revised and Proposed City Ordinance
Self-Service Registration Application
PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
The City Council will consider adoption of this ordinance at its September 14, 2021 meeting.
CITY OF OAKDALE
ORDINANCE xxx
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF OAKDALE, CHAPTER 13 –
OFFENSES– MISCELLANEOUS, ADDING ARTICLE 6 – TEMPORARY STORAGE.
The City Council of the City of Oakdale ordains:
Section 1. The Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13, is hereby amended to add the
following article:
ARTICLE 6. TEMPORARY STORAGE
Sec. 13-23. Intent and Purpose. The purpose of this Article is to provide standards to insure that
temporary containers are used for short-term storage; are not used as accessory buildings; do not
impede vehicular access, traffic flow, or circulation; or create public safety hazards.
Sec. 13-24. Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in the Article, shall have the
meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
City means City of Oakdale, Minnesota.
Container means portable, on-demand storage devices.
Temporary Storage Container Registration means the form used by a person having a Container
placed on property in the City.
Sec. 13-25. Prohibited Activity. Except as hereafter provided, no person shall place or have placed
on property in the City, a Container without adhering to the following:
(a) Container shall remain on the property for no more than 60 days;
(b) Container must be placed or parked on a paved or gravel area unless the main structure is
being constructed and a driveway has not yet been installed; in this case, the Container
shall be placed or parked in the proposed driveway location;
(c) Container must be placed or parked entirely on private property as close to the main
structure as possible; not on any roadway, sidewalk, right-of-way, or other public property,
or blocking any site lines;
(d) Container must be placed or parked at least five feet from any property line;
(e) A total of two containers may be placed or parked on a property at one time, with a
maximum of two occurrences allowed for an individual property in a calendar year;
(f) Container must be clearly labeled with the name and telephone number of the container
owner.
(g) Dumpsters, dumpster bags, roll-off containers, and tubs shall be regulated under Chapter
6 of the City Code.
Sec. 13-26. Container Registration. Persons having a Container placed on property in the City shall
register their Container prior to its expected delivery.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its adoption and
publication, as provided by law.
CODE ENFORCEMENT
1584 Hadley Avenue N.Oakdale, MN 55128
651-702-5225
TEMPORARY STORAGE CONTAINER REGISTRATION
Having a temporary storage container placed on your property? Please complete and submit this
registration form; a copy will be provided to the Oakdale Code Enforcement Officer. There is no fee
associated with this registration.
Container requirements:
(a) Container shall remain on the property for no more than 60 days.
(b) Container must be placed or parked on a paved or gravel area unless the main structure is being
constructed and a driveway has not yet been installed; in this case, the container shall be placed
or parked in the proposed driveway location;
(c) Container must be placed or parked entirely on private property as close to the main structure as
possible; not on any roadway, sidewalk, right-of-way, or other public property, or blocking any site
lines;
(d) Container must be placed or parked at least five feet from any property line;
(e) A total of two containers may be placed or parked on a property at one time, with a maximum of
two occurrences allowed for an individual property in a calendar year;
(f) Container must be clearly labeled with the name and telephone number of the container owner.
(g) This registration does not pertain to dumpsters, dumpster bags, roll-off containers, or tubs.
(h) Failure to register a container could result in you receiving a violation notice.
Your Name
Your Address
Your Phone
Number(s) I
Describe Where
Container will be
Placed
Container
Date of Arrival
Name of Container
Owner/Business
Get email alerts for Oakdale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.