City Council
Regular MeetingOdessa, TX · March 16, 2021
Minutes
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES
CITY OF ODESSA, TEXAS
March 16, 2021
On March 16, 2021, a work session meeting of the Odessa City Council was held at 3:00
p.m., Odessa, Texas. Due to the COVID-19, the meeting was teleconferenced, as allowed
by the Governor’s executive order. City Council was present through teleconference.
City Council present: Mayor Javier Joven; Council members: Mark Matta, District One;
Steven Thompson, District Two; Tom Sprawls, District Four; Mari Willis, District Five; and
Denise Swanner, At-Large.
City Council absent: Council member Detra White, District Three.
Others present: Michael Marrero, City Manager; Norma Aguilar-Grimaldo, City Secretary;
Natasha Brooks, City Attorney; Cindy Muncy, Assistant City Manager; Phillip Urrutia,
Assistant City Manager; and other members of City staff.
A quorum being present, Mayor Joven called the meeting to order and the following
proceedings were held:
Presentation and discussion on the Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation. Hutch
Musallam, Vice President of Carollo Engineering, provided the background of the Water
Treatment Plant assessment made in 2016 and 2017. The assessment identified issues
and improvements for the plant. He stated that there were Texas Commission
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regulations to be met and increase water production. He
reviewed the recommended improvements for the plant.
Council member Thompson joined the meeting at 3:12 p.m.
Mr. Musallam stated that technological advance would improve the plant’s performance and
revitalize the aging facility. He discussed major scopes of the rehab. He stated that the
filters did not meet TCEQ standard but with the renovations it would be brought up to code.
Mr. Kerr explained that the filter conditions was grandfathered and not a violation. With the
rehab, the filter would be upgraded to TCEQ standards. Mayor Joven asked about
addendums increasing the cost. Mr. Musallam stated that TCEQ may make modifications to
the plan, but the cost was figured into the cost of the rehab. Mayor Joven asked if the funds
could be recaptured if there were no changes from TCEQ. Mr. Musallam stated that the
design was in accordance with TCEQ requirements. Council member Thompson asked
about change orders and what was the percentage for contingency. Mr. Musallam stated
that the project included unidentified cost. Another major scope was to improve the chemical
feed and storage buildings. He reviewed the issues with the chlorine building. Council
member Thompson asked about the growth of the city and the plant capacity. Mr. Musallam
stated that the plant improvements allowed to increase capacity. Mr. Kerr reviewed the
demand usage. Mr. Marrero stated that there was capacity to grow. The plant was designed
economically and future growth. Another major scope was to improve the pump station. Mr.
Musallam identified minor improvements. The pump station was installed in the early 1980’s.
Other major scopes included the project rehab on electrical and improve the administrative
building. Mr. Kerr provided explanation on the improvements. Mr. Musallam reviewed a
proposed schedule for funding the Water Treatment Plant. Construction could be started in
November 2021 with a completion in November 2024. Mr. Marrero stated that the schedule
Council Work Session Minutes
March 16, 2021
Page 2
was contingent on funding. Mr. Musallam reviewed the process for a new Water Treatment
Plant. The cost of a new plant would be $297 million with a time completion of 7 ½ years.
Mrs. Muncy stated that there were options to issue debt. She introduced George Williford
with Hilltop Securities. Mr. Williford identified and reviewed the financing options available.
The General Obligation (GO) was a process of an election. If the proposition failed, then the
city could not do any Certificates of Obligation for three years. He reviewed tax notes,
revenue bonds and public property finance contractual obligations. He identified the
professionals involved with debt issuance. Different schedules were developed and
reviewed for Certificates of Obligation (CO). Council member Thompson asked about the
Pioneer funds and suggested to pay with a combination of debt and cash. Mrs. Muncy
explained revenue bonds that would be paid from the customers. She stated that the COs
was a tax guarantee and did not affect the property tax rate. She explained the interest rate
and principal payments. She reviewed the Water/Sewer revenue and the Pioneer revenue
funds. She stated that additional projects could use the Pioneer funds. The additional
projects included Line Q, waterline, storage tank and the IH-20 corridor. She reviewed the
Water/Sewer Fund Balance and the rates. A health fund balance maintained would provide
for a favorable debt issuance. Mr. Williford stated that most cities use COs for utility projects.
He recommended the COs. Council member Matta asked about the scenarios for a GO
bond. Mr. Williford stated that the interest rates were the same. For a GO bond, the election
could be held as early as November 2021. Council member Matta stated that the citizens
could be educated. Mayor Joven stated that the COs removed the citizens from the process.
He stated that no one was disagreeing with the projects, but the citizens wanted to be a part
of the process. Council member Thompson stated that a 2021 election would be a low voter
turnout. He stated that the elected officials were to make the best fiscal decisions. The City
could not advertise or campaign for the bond. Mr. Williford stated that the City was
precluded from advocacy but could present facts. Council member Thompson favored using
some cash and COs. Council member Matta asked on implementing a Municipal Utility
District. It would provide financial help for improvements of a Water Treatment Plant.
Council member Willis stated that the plant was not in good condition and must be
addressed quickly. The Council should be financial astute but not have the water system
fail. Council member Thompson stated that there was growth, and a business decision must
be made with not taking a risk of the plant failing. Mr. Marrero stated that the presentation
was for the understanding of the project and get direction with the new council. Mayor Joven
asked for the GO schedule for an election and discuss at the retreat. The Council had a
consensus to discuss at the retreat. Mayor Joven stated that the citizens should be inclusive
and allow to consider the debt issuance with an election.
Council member Sprawls left the meeting.
Bid award for the 2021 sealcoat project. Yervand Hmayakyan, City Engineer, stated that
three bids were received. Staff recommended the lowest bidder from CK Newberry for
$643,514.15 which was less than the estimate. The sealcoat project would be for 6.6 linear
miles. Mr. Kerr stated it was a smaller number of streets as other methods were also used
for the streets.
Bid award for Floyd Gwin Park Phase 2 renovations. Steve Patton, Director of Parks and
Recreation, reported that Phase 1 construction would begin March 22. Two bids were
received for Phase 2. He recommended Onyx Construction for $4,964,777 which included
added alternatives. The project was under budget. Council member Wills was excited to
see the renovations to the park for the citizens to enjoy. She was thankful for the project and
the staff. Mr. Patton explained the features of the concession stand as it cost $400,000. The
concession stand would be two-story with restrooms and staircase. He explained in detail
the lighting for the park.
Council Work Session Minutes
March 16, 2021
Page 3
Motion was made by Council member Swanner and seconded by Council member Matta to
adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Joven, Matta, Thompson, Willis, Swanner
Nay: None
The meeting adjourned at 5:32 p.m.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Norma Aguilar-Grimaldo, TRMC, CMC Javier Joven
City Secretary Mayor
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
ODESSA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Tuesday, March 16th, 2021 at 3:00 p.m.
Webex Login: https://cityofodessa-ibv.my.webex.com/cityofodessa-
ibv.my/j.php?MTID=m8d1889086fb668e5aa9edb6ebd497f71
Meeting number (access code): 182 646 2458
Meeting password: Odessa123
In accordance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Government Code of Texas, notice is hereby given to all interested
persons that the Odessa City Council will have a Work Session at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 16th 2021 through Webex for the
following purposes:
Call to Order
Invocation
1. Presentation and Discussion on the Water Treatment Plan Rehabilitation
2. Consider award of bid for 2021 Sealcoat Project
3. Consider a bid award for Phase 2 renovations at Floyd Gwin Park
Adjourn
This Notice is being posted on the bulletin board located outside the south entrance of the City Hall building and on the bulletin board
of the first floor of City Hall, Odessa, Texas the _______ day of March, 2021 at ________, ___. m. It is also posted on the City of
Odessa’s website www.odessa-tx.gov. The said time being more then seventy-two (72) hours prior to the time at which the subject
meeting will be convened and called to order.
The Work Session meeting is available to all persons regardless of disability. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance
should contact the City Secretary’s Office at (432) 335-3276, or 411 West 8th Street, First Floor, Odessa, Texas, during normal
business hours at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting.
Norma Aguilar-Grimaldo, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary, TRMC, CMC
ODESSA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Tuesday, March 16th, 2021 at 3:00 p.m.
Webex Login: https://cityofodessa-ibv.my.webex.com/cityofodessa-
ibv.my/j.php?MTID=m8d1889086fb668e5aa9edb6ebd497f71
Meeting number (access code): 182 646 2458
Meeting password: Odessa123
Invocation
1. Presentation and Discussion on the Water Treatment Plan Rehabilitation Tom Kerr
2. Consider award of bid for 2021 Sealcoat Project Yervand Hmayakyan
3. Consider a bid award for Phase 2 renovations at Floyd Gwin Park Steve Patton
CITY OF ODESSA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Meeting Date Contact Department Fiscal Impact?
3/23/2021 Yervand Hmayakyan Public Works Yes
Work Session? Contacted Legal? Item Type
Yes No Regular Bid Award,
CAPTION
Consider award of bid for 2021 Sealcoat, Job # 210010-31
SUMMARY
The bids for this project were opened on March 9, 2021. Three responsive bids were submitted for this
project. The lowest responsive bidder was CK Newberry, LLC from Kenedy, TX in the amount of
$643,514.15. The bid was 12% less than the engineer's estimate. Engineer's estimate for this project was
$730,000. The purpose of this project is to sealcoat approximately 254,000 square yards of major and
minor arterial streets.
The Public Works Department is planning to work with CK Newberry, LLC for the first time. We have
witnessed Ector County use CK Newberry contractor’s service in 2020 for the County’s sealcoat program
and the County found the work favorable. Approximately 700,000 square yards of sealcoat was applied.
The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids and recommends awarding the bid to CK Newberry,
LLC in the amount of $643,514.15.
FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year Fund Type Cost or Revenue? Fiscal Note Attached?
2021 General Cost No
Available Funds Budget Est/Actual Cost Difference
This Agenda Item: $643514.15 $643514.15 $0.00
ACTION NEEDED TO AMEND THE BUDGET
Appropriation Amount: $ Transfer Amount: $
Appropriation By:
Comments/Other Departments, Boards, Commissions or Agencies
Funds are available in the street Division Maintenance of Infrastructure Account No. 53030100-52150
Supporting Documents
2021 Seal Coat Bid Tab.pdf, 2021 Seal Coat Location Map.pdf,
l
BID TABULATION
2021 Seal Coat
Job No. 210010-31
March 9, 2021 @ 3:30pm
BID SECURITY TOTAL BID
BIDDER
Ploch Construction Co.
New Braunfels, Tx ✓ $699,853.50
Ronald R, Wagner & Co. LP
Kendalia, Tx ✓ $689,587.92
CK Newberry, LLC.
Kenedy, Tx ✓ $643,514.15
CITY OF ODESSA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Meeting Date Contact Department Fiscal Impact?
3/23/2021 Steve Patton Parks & Recreation Yes
Work Session? Contacted Legal? Item Type
Yes Yes Consent Other,
CAPTION
Consider a Bid Award for Phase 2 renovations at Floyd Gwin Park.
SUMMARY
Phase 1 renovations planned for Floyd Gwin Park is underway and includes three (3) lighted volleyball
courts, three (3) lighted basketball courts, and two (2) lighted tennis courts. The park site renovations
planned for Phase 2 include, three (3) lighted baseball fields/ complex, lighted walking trails, lighted
parking lots, irrigation system, picnic pavilions, additional playground equipment, swimming pool perimeter
fencing, and electrical service upgrades. This particular phase also includes the fencing and athletic field
lighting installation at Sherwood Park Baseball Complex that is needed to complete the fourth baseball
field.
Public Notices were advertised January 24,2021, January 31, 2021. Bids were publicly opened February
9, 2021 @ 3:30 p.m., City Hall, 411 West 8th Street, Odessa, Texas.
Bids submitted include:
JC Roberts Construction - $5,043,000 - Base bid, $1,290,500 - Add alternatives recommended.
Onyx Construction - $4,964,777 - Base bid, $922,642 - Add alternatives recommended.
Funding in the amount of $8,450,000 is available for the renovations planned for Floyd Gwin Park and
improvements planned for the Baseball Complex at Sherwood Park. The Base Bid from Onyx Contractors,
LLC in the amount of $4,964,777 is within the line-item budget for the renovations planned in Phase 2.
KDC Associates, Landscape Architects for the project and Staff recommend award to Onyx Contractors,
LLC.
FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year Fund Type Cost or Revenue? Fiscal Note Attached?
2021 GENERAL Cost Yes
Available Funds Budget Est/Actual Cost Difference
This Agenda Item: $5887419.00 $5887419.00 $0.00
ACTION NEEDED TO AMEND THE BUDGET
Appropriation Amount: $ Transfer Amount: $
Appropriation By:
Comments/Other Departments, Boards, Commissions or Agencies
Supporting Documents
Budget.pdf, Plans _ Specifications distribution list.pdf, Rec. Letter _ Bid Tabulation.pdf,
FLOYD GWIN BUDGET TOTALS AS OF 3‐11‐2021
GENERAL AVAILABLE NUMBERS OF OVERALL PROJECT
BOND FUND BUDGET $ 8,450,000.00
PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT $ (84,500.00)
BALANCE REMAINING AFTER PUBLIC ART $ 8,365,500.00
PARKS CAPITAL ACCOUNT ‐ POOL FENCE $ 19,200.00
AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR THIS PROJECT $ 8,384,700.00
ONYX CONSTRUCTION BID $ (4,964,777.00)
AMOUNT AVAILABLE AFTER ONYX BASE BID $ 3,419,923.00
MAX. AVAILABLE VIA ADD ALTERNATE CHANGE ORDERS (25% OF BASE BID) $ 1,241,194.00
ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURES TO PROJECT
AWARDED FOR SPORT COURT RENOVATION $ 707,600.00
PROFESSIONAL FEES $ 892,000.00
ANTICIPATED CONCESSION FACILITY COST $ 400,000.00
RECOMMENDED ADD ALTERNATES TO BE AWARDED
ADD ALTERNATE 1 ADDITIONAL 5’ SIDEWALK $ 62,250.00
ADD ALTERNATE 2 SMALL PAVILIONS W/SLABS $ 30,800.00
ADD ALTERNATE 3 LARGE PAVILIONS W/SLABS $ 212,700.00
ADD ALTERNATE 4 NORTH‐END EXPANSION OF EAST PARKING LOT $ 69,640.00
ADD ALTERNATE 5 NORTH‐END LIGHTING OF EAST PARKING LOT $ 25,432.00
ADD ALTERNATE 6 SOUTH‐END LIGHTING OF EAST PARKING LOT $ 24,000.00
ADD ALTERNATE 7 EAST‐END EXPANSION OF NORTH PARKING LOT $ 138,750.00
ADD ALTERNATE 8 EAST‐END LIGHTING OF NORTH PARKING LOT $ 17,200.00
ADD ALTERNATE 9 WEST‐END LIGHTING OF NORTH PARKING LOT $ 22,000.00
ADD ALTERNATE 10 LIGHTING OF 8’ PRIMARY TRAIL $ 198,250.00
ADD ALTERNATE 11 LIGHTING OF 5’ SECONDARY TRAIL $ 21,600.00
ADD ALTERNATE 12 LIGHTING OF SOUTHEAST PARKING LOT $ 12,670.00
ADD ALTERNATE 13 LIGHTING OF SOUTHWEST PARKING LOT $ 38,700.00
ADD ALTERNATE 20 RENOVATION OF SOUTHEAST PARKING LOT $ 168,750.00
CREDIT ‐ ADD ALTERNATE 17 SPRIGGING VS. SODDING OF FIELDS $ (120,100.00)
TOTAL AMOUNT RECOMMENDED OF ADD ALTERNATES $ 922,642.00
FINAL NUMBERS
AVAILABLE PROJECT BUDGET $ 8,384,700.00
ONYX CONSTRUCTION BASE BID $ (4,964,777.00)
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE AFTER AWARD OF BASE BID $ 3,419,923.00
TOTAL AMOUNT OF RECOMMENDED ADD ALTERNATES $ (922,642.00)
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE AFTER AWARD OF BASE BID AND ADD ALTERNATES $ 2,497,281.00
FUNDS PREVIOUSLY AWARDED TO SPORT COURT RENOVATION PROJECT $ (707,600.00)
FUNDS PREVIOUSLY AWARDED FOR PROFESSIONAL FEES $ (892,000.00)
FUNDS SET ASIDE FOR NEW CONCESSION BUILDING AT BASEBALL FIELD $ (400,000.00)
FUNDS SET ASIDE FOR CONTINGENCY $ (200,000.00)
TOTAL FUNDS REMAINING FROM BOND FUND PROJECT LESS ART ALLOWANCE $ 297,681.00
Nancy Marin
From: Steve Patton
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 11:05 AM
To: Nancy Marin
Subject: Floyd Gwin Park Renovation Project- Bidders List
Nancy
Please attach the list below to the Council Agenda ltem for the Floyd Gwin Park Renovation Project Bid
Award.
Thanks,
Steve
The following is a list of contractors that requested a set of plans and specifications for the Floyd Gwin Park
Renovation Project:
1. Cooper Construction
2. CDMT Construction
3. Remco
4. LondscopesUnlimited
5. Lee Lewis Construciion
6. HowkinsConstruction
7. Onyx Construction
8. JC Roberts Construction
9. Porogon Sports
10. Sports Field Soluiions
11. Hellos Construction
12. Fielder's Choice Controcton
73. 6-3-4 Construction Solutions
14. MUSCO Lighiing
1s. Texos Mulii-Chem Bollfield Consiruction
Nancy Marin
From: Steve Patton
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 202 i 10:18 AM
To: Nancy Marin
Subject: Floyd Gwin Bid 5ummary and Recommendation
Attachments: Floyd Gwin Park Bids.pdf
N ancy
Please attach the email below and the attached Bids.pdf from Kelly to the Council Agenda ltem for the Floyd
Gwin Park Renovation Project Bid Award.
InanKS,
Steve
From: kelly@kdcassociates.com <kelly@kdcassociates.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9,20214:47 PM
To: Steve Patton <spatton @odessa-tx.gov>
Subject: Floyd Gwin Bid Summary and Recommendation
Steve:
We hove oiloched files contoining complete bids for the Floyd Gwin Renovotion Project from two
locol generol controctors, Onyx Construction ond JC Roberts Conslruclion. In generol the bids were
os follows:
JC Roberls Conslrucfion:
Bose Bid lncluding Bonding: $5,043,000.00
Onyx Construclion:
Bose Bid lncluding Bonding: $4,964,777.00
Both were complete bids ond included oll oddendo ond bonding requirements. Both
ocknowledged o 300 working-doy construction timeline. KDC ond the City of Odesso hove
successfully worked wiih both controclors on multiple pro.iects throughout Odesso ond the region,
ond both hove performed to requested slondords.
As you ore owore, the project hod on octuol ovoiloble working budget of $8,384,200.00. We ore
pleosed to inform you thoi this project is under-budget.
Bosed up this informotion, KDC Associotes recommends owording ihe controct to the lowest bidder,
Onvx Construction, for the omount of $4,964.777.OO. As you ore owore, there ore numerous odd-
olternole bid items thot moy be odded or deleted from the successful bid. As the project develops,
we con discuss ond moke recommendotions regording eoch of ihese.
Pleose let me know if you need ony odditionol questions.
Thonks,
Kelly D. Cook, RtA, ASLA
Founding Principol + Parlner
KD A,ro.iot.,
Plonning + Design Solulions
4400 N. Big Spring. Suite 203
Mid ond, Texos 79705
www.kdcqssociqles.com
432.686.8001
A HUB Cerlified Firm
J4 fiPFr<f5
The undersigned bidder a$ees to commence work within ten (10) days after thc date written notice
to do so shall have been given to him, or within fifteen (15) days after award of the conhact,
whichever occurs the earliest, and to complete the work on whisb he had bid within
300 working days, as providsd in thc Gcneral Conditions ofthe contact.
Enclosed with this proposal is a Cashier's or Certificd Check or Bid Bond in the amount of
5t or rot.l Dollars. Thc bidder agrees that this check or bond witl be held by the City as
security until an award is made for the work covered by this proposal or until all bids are rejectcd.
Tho City will bs allowed fifteen ( l5) days from date of bid opening to make this decision. ln case
award is not made on this proposal, the security check or bid bond will be retumod to the
undersiped bidder. If successful, thc undersigned bidder will bo allowed ten (10) days from &te
of notice to execute a Contract. Ifand when the Bond is fumished and the Contract is executed,
within the time allowed, the attached check or bid bond shall be retumed to the undersigned bidder.
ln case of failure to furnish the required Bonds or execute the Contract, with all required forms,
within the time allowed, the City will be allowed to cash this check or make demand on this bond
and retain the proceeds as liquidated damages.
The bidder hereby acknowledges receipt ofAddendum Numbers on. ,
-
BID ADD ALTERNATES: PROVIDE ALLCOST T.I NUftIBERSI
1. ADDITIONAL 5' WIOE CONCRET€ SIDEWALK s 5s, 5oo. oo
2. CONCRETE SLAB AND SMALL PICNIC PAVILION
SMALL SINGLE-TABLE PICNIC PAVILION
53, 500.00
(6) SLABS/PAVTLTONS - PROVIDE PEMJNIT COST
3. CONCRETE SLAB ANO LARGE PICNIC PAVILION
(2) SUAS/PAVILIONS - PROVIDE UNIT COST 21.2, OOO. OO
4. EAST PARKING LOT ADDITION - NORTH END CONSTRUCTION 10{, 000.00
(tsg1uo e crgdl for ing4tlon dol€tbn whkh sh@ld b 'afl€cted ln this number)
5. EAST PARKTNG LOT ADDITION - NORTH END SITE LIGHTING $j7 000.00
6. EAST PARKING LOT ADOITION - SOUTH END SITE LIGHTING 33,000.00
7. NORTH PARKING LOT AODITION - EAST END CONSTRUCTION 143, 000.00
(lstuo a ctdit tot i.rigdtion delalion which shoud be /€/,€cied ln lhig nurfrer)
8. NORTH PARKING LOT ADDITION - EAST END SITE LIGHTING $_-13499!9_-
Jc pac$)
9. NORTH PARKING LOT ADDITION - WEST END SITE TIGHTING $ 21, 000 . 00
IO. SITE LIGHTING OF 8'WIDE CONCRETE TRATL $ 33r, s00 . 00
1,I, SITE LIGHTING OF 5' WIDECONCRETE TMIL g 10, s00,00
12. SITE LIGHTING OF RENOVATED SOUTHEAST PARKING LOT $22 500.00
13. SITE LIGHTING OF RENOVATEO SOUTHWEST PARKING LOT ,t1 000.00
't4. BRICK ENTRY WITH FENCE AND SIGNS AT BASEBALL COMPLEX $ 000. 00
,t6
coNcRETE FLATWORK AND CONSTRUCTTON OF (3) PERGOLAS
AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARK $ 929 000.00
16. SPLASH PAD - COMPLETE INCLUDING ELECTRICAUPLUMBING $_!l!,!!!_,!0 _
f\
17. (CREDIT) SPRIG TIFSPORT GRASS IN LEIU OF SOD AT (- ZS,ooo.oo I
AASEBALL COMPLEX $r+2Foe.o$----J
18. MUSCO "MUSCOVISION" BASEEALL BROADCASTING SYSTEM $-i99499:oo
19. CONCRETE BASE AND SUMP UNDER PLAYGROUND SURFACING $lt 000. o0
20, SOUTHEAST PARKING LOT RENOVATION $ 203,000.00
4,Q01 ooo.oo {b
AMOU}IT OF BASE BlD ONLY: 3-5,.5sJ'rl0s:oe
AMOUNT OF BID CHECK OR BID BOND: $_t! 000.00
g o (3, ooo \l It
<1
JU
TOTAL BASE BID INCLUDING BID CHECK OR BID BOND:
(DO NOT INCLUDE ANY ADD ALTERNATE ITEMS)
J6FealRI?
TOTAL BASE BID INCLUDING BID CI{ECK
OR BID BO,{D:
F,Vg t{tluroru ILrs u $4/yd
(tNwoRDS)
ortARSrro?*
PROPOSED CONTRACT WORKING DAYS: 300
Fq vts.Ntl)og€ ot fis g;e4 e uu*hg Ay b
ddfttd aE tufpnt,ay nnt Atay. X f*tA 6m
^. Bqnizc<t
>ral6 lnliday..! rr, as rpcf,ondt a'r
trol coasiratld I t ,.o.ldtrg d.l).
Grddi., ItP
(SIGNATURE OF
REPRESENTTNG: r.c. Rob.I!: q9::!::9rio-1_coqtny, trc.
ADDRESS OF BIDDING COI'PANY:
-
400 South X.&to,
od.r.., t rr. ?9761
DATE: 2-e-zozL
aFt{N
The undersigned bidder agrees to commence work within ton (10) days afier the date wriften notice
to do so shall have been given to him, or within fifteen (15) days after award of the contract,
whichever occurs the earliest, and to complete the work on which he had bid within
300 working days, as provided in the General Conditions of the contract.
Enclosed with this proposal is a CashieCs or Cenifred Check or Bid Bond in the amount of
Dollars. The bidder agress that this oheck or bond will be held by the City as
security until an award is made for the work covered by this proposal or until all bids are rejected.
The Citywill be allowed fiftecn (15) days from datc of bid opening to make this decision. In case
award is not made on this proposal, the security check or bid bond will be returned to the
undersigned bidder. lf successful, the undersigned bidder will be allowed ten ( l0) days from date
ofnotice to execute a Contract. Ifand when the Bond is fumished and thc Contract is executcq
within the time allowed, the attached check or bid bond shall be retumed to the undersigned bidder.
ln case of failure to furnish the required Bonds or cxccutc thc Contract, with all required forms,
within the time allowed, the City will be allowed to cash this check or make demand on this bond
and retain the proceeds as liquidated damages.
The bidder heroby acknowledges receipt of Addendum Numbers 1 ,
-,
BID ADD ALTERNATES: (PRoVIDE ALL cosT IN NUMBERSI
1. ADDITIONAL 5' WIOE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
2. CONCRETE SLAB AND SMALL PICNIC PAVILION
SMALL SINGLE.TABLE PICNIC PAVILION
(6) SLAES/PAVTLTONS - PROVIDE PEFvUNTT COST
3. CONCRETE SLAB AND LARGE PICNIC PAVILION
(2) SLABS/PAV|LTONS - PROVTDE UNtT COST Tt'L7l.b. '
S.....'.......-.-
4. EAST PARKING LOT ADDITION . NORTH END CONSTRUCTION
(l$sue E c@dit tor lnlgation dek,tion whbh should be rcflectad in lhb numbei
5. EAST PARKING LOT ADDITION - NORTH END SITE LIGHTING
6. EAST PARKING LOT ADDITION - SOUTH END SITE LIGHTING
7. NORTH PARKING LOT ADDITION - EAST END CONSTRUCTION
(tssue a qedit tot lnigalion delelion wtwl should b niected in thls numbar)
s)2L4_to:_
8, NORTH PARKING LOT ADDITION - EAST END SITE LIGHTING
9. NORTH PARKING LOT ADDITION - WEST END SITE LIGHTING
s--21a*-'-
10. SITE LIOHTTNG OF 8' WIDE CONCRETE TRAIL
11. SITE LIGHTTNG OF 5' WIDE CONCRETE TRATL
D zl Goo.
12. SITE LIGHTING OF RENOVATED SOUTHEAST PARKING
LOT
13, SITE LIGHTING OF RENOVATEO SOUTHWEST PARKING
LOT
14. BRICK ENTRY WITH FENCE AND SIGNS AT BASEBALL
COMPLEX
r5. coNcRETE FLATWORK AND CONSTRUCTTON OF (3) PERGOLAS
AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARK
I6. SPLASH PAD - COMPLETE INCLUDING ELECTRICAUPLUMBING
s-@ess-=:
17. (CREDIT) SpRtc TtFspoRT GRASS tN LErU OF SOD AT cll<.2r,
BASEBALL COMPLEX
sr l?::c^tcp' - t
18. MUSCO'MUSCOVISION' BASEBALL BROADCASTING SYSTEM
$
19. CONCRETE BASE AND SUMP UNDER PLAYGROUND SURFACING
s
20. SOUTHEAST PARKING LOT RENOVATION
$
AI'OUNT OF BASE BID ONLY:
s4$-s+t1--
AMOUNT OF BIO CHECK OR BID BOND:
$___69'+0et:_
TOTAL BASE BID TNCLUDING BID CHECK OR BID BOND:
7t7.-
(DO NOf INCLUDE ANY ADD ALTERNATE ITEMS)
oilY1(
TOTAL BASE AID INCLUDING
BID CHECK OR BID BOND:
DOLLARS em
PROPOSEO CONTRACT WORKING
DAYS:
,tot @n$Eec|d as c rci tg dey).
REPRESENTINc; ONYX GENEML coNTRAcToRs, Lcc
ADDRESS OF BIDDING COMPANY:
1010 s FM 1788
MIDLAND, TEXAS
pa16. 02-09-2021
Get email alerts for Odessa
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.