Muyni
← Back to Ossining

Work Session

Regular Meeting

Ossining, NY · June 26, 2024

Agenda

Agenda

Village of Ossining Work Session Agenda Wednesday, June 26, 2024 @ 7:30 PM 16 Croton Ave. Board Room OSSINING, NEW YORK and VIA ZOOM Members of the public can view the meeting via computer or mobile app: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83519013039 Members of the public can listen to the meeting by dialing in via phone: +1 929 205 6099 Webinar ID: 835 1901 3039 **Please note that by dialing in, your phone number will be visible to the host, participants, and attendees of the meeting.** Topic: Request to Purchase Street Sweeper Contact: Paul Fraioli, P.E. Village Engineer Topic: Vehicles to be Declared Surplus Contact: Paul Fraioli, P.E. Village Engineer Topic: CDBG Projects Contact: Karen D'Attore, Village Manager Topic: Secor Road Outreach Summary Contact: Karen D'Attore, Village Manager & Valerie Monastra, Principal Planner, Nelson Pope Voorhis SecorRoadOUtreach Memo 240621 Topic: Village Affordable Housing Program Contact: Karen D'Attore, Village Manager & Valerie Monastra, Principal Planner, Nelson Pope Voorhis Topic: CPRG Cohort Grant Application MOA for OFD Heat Pump Grant Contact: Maddi Zachacz, Assistant Village Manager DRAFTSimplified-MOA-HeatPumps-CPRG- Rev 6-12-24 CLEANwSignaturePg ADJOURNMENT - WORK SESSION Work Session June 26, 2024 Page 1 of 15 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the Village of Ossining Village Board FROM: Valerie Monastra, AICP Danielle Dreyer, Planning Analyst CC: Karen D’Attore, Village Manager Maddi Zachacz, Assistant Village Manager Stuart Kahan, Corporation Counsel DATE: June 21, 2024 RE: Secor Road Outreach The Village Board is interested in investigating possible zoning text amendments to permit residential- only development within the Station Plaza North (SP-N) zoning district. Currently, residential uses are permitted as conditional uses within the district, but §270-20(C) only permits residential dwelling units above nonresidential uses, and no part of any residential unit can be located on the ground floor or in a basement. At a previous work session, we discussed potentially permitting residential units to be built within mixed- use buildings, multifamily buildings, single-family attached housing, two-family housing, or single-family detached housing. The various housing types would have different minimum lot areas depending on the housing type. The SP-N zoning district already contains a variety of housing types and lot sizes. Table 1 identifies the property, lot area, square footage of the building, and percentage of building coverage. 156 Route 59, Suite C6, Suffern, New York 10901 | 845.368.1472 | nelsonpopevoorhis.com Page 2 of 15 Secor Road Outreach 6/21/24 Table 1 Properties within the SP-N Zoning District Lot Area Percent (square Structure Area Building Use SBL feet) Acres (square feet) Coverage 97.07-1-2 1,417 0.03 722 51% 3 Family Unit 97.07-1-4 1,873 0.04 1,428 76% Two Family, Commercial on First Floor 97.07-1-5 2,431 0.06 1,213 50% Two Family, Commercial on First Floor 97.07-1-6 6,987 0.17 3,013 43% Two Family, Commercial on First Floor 97.07-1-14 8,791 0.2 5,470 62% Single Family Commercial on First Floor 97.07-1-22 1,607 0.04 886 55% Two Family 97.07-1-23 2,613 0.06 817 31% Two Family 97.07-1-24 2,647 0.06 787 30% Single Family 97.07-1-26 3,383 0.08 1,578 47% Two Family 97.07-1-28 2,362 0.05 692 29% 4 Apartment Units 97.07-1-34 6,062 0.14 935 15% Three family 97.07-1-35 801 0.02 676 84% Two Family 97.07-1-36 825 0.02 792 97% Two Family 97.07-1-40 1,508 0.03 1,209 80% 4 Apartment Units 97.07-1-41 1,985 0.05 894 45% Single Family 97.07-1-42 4,275 0.1 744 17% Two Family 97.07-1-43 1,609 0.04 967 60% Two Family Before coming back to the Board with proposed zoning, the Board agreed it would be important to get the input of the neighborhood first on what they would like to see. In addition, since this area will also be undergoing streetscaping and pedestrian improvements due to the Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI) funding and a new solar canopy will be installed in the adjoining parking lot, the Board thought we could obtain feedback on the DRI project and provide the community information on the solar canopy at the same time. We held an open house on June 6th from 2:00 pm – 8:00 pm and again on June 8th from 10:00am -12:00 pm at Here Coffee +Beer. We had over 75 people particiate and many more asked questions. Many of the participants were from the neighborhood. The following pages provides information on the feedback we received. Overall, people felt that smaller scale development is more appropriate and a mix of uses should continue to be allowed in the area. They wanted to see parking in the rear or internal to a building. The public also wanted to see outdoor dining opportunities, improvements to sidewalks, lighting and general greening of station plaza with planters or other plantings. Page 2 of 3 Page 3 of 15 SUMMARY OF OUTREACH Station 2 – Parking Design PARKING IS VERY DIFFICULT IN THE AREA. IF NEW DEVELOPMENT WERE TO OCCUR, WHAT TYPE OF PARKING LAYOUR DO YOU THINK WOULD BE BEST FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD? Parking in Front of the Building- 9 Votes Parking in Rear of the Building- 24 Votes Interior Parking/Garage on First Floor- 29 Votes Street Parking- 6 Votes Other ideas? What do you think would work best for the neighborhood? Add your post its here: - Would be good to minimize street and in front of building parking so those are free for other events and uses - Preferably as little parking as possible, this is right near a train. - What about an overnight pass system for neighborhood residents to use the train station lot during hours of least use? - Really a mix of parking in front, parking in rear, and street parking - We need parking for those who frequent businesses in the area - Boston is good example especially Brookline Condos with assigned outdoor parking in the back - Station parking should be partitioned to allow more daily/ hourly parking Station 2 – Residential and Commercial Visual Preferences ADD A STICKER TO THE USE AND STYLE OF THE BUILDINGS THAT YOU THINK SHOULD BE PERMITTED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Single Family Dwellings- 8 Votes Two Family Dwelling- 10 Votes Three Family Dwelling- 2 Votes Small Scale Apartment Building- 6 Votes Mixed Use, Commercial on Ground Floor- 33 Votes Townhouse Style Single Family Housing- 14 Votes 1 Page 4 of 15 Large Scale Apartment Building- 2 Vote Adaptive Reuse of Residential for Commercial- 5 Votes Small Scale Commercial Building- 26 Votes Other ideas? What would you like to see in the SP-N Zone? Add a post it with your comments here: - No more large-scale apartment buildings (4) o Harbor Square was originally approved for small scale mixed use (2) - See new buildings built to look like the original style of main street buildings with some charm to them (3) - No single family (2) o It’s a waste of land near a transit hub - Housing over commercial (2) o Pedestrian friendly o Store without people is not sustainable and residents want shops in walking distance - Waterfront needs retail and dining, not a bunch of low-income housing that will not contribute anything to the local economy, not to mention that it will be: o An eye sore o And take up already limited parking space What we need is to emulate places like Tarry Town and Yonkers, whose waterfronts have been developed not only positively impacted the growth of the economy, but also has provided an enhanced public space and diversified the use of the waterfront by using creative programming to help it thrive year around. - Visit Yonkers riverwalk (do that) - Owners of properties should have an option to have either commercial or residential use on the first and second floor - Minimize three family dwellings or commercial on the first floor - Housing density must meet current street sizes, not a lot of services available on riverfront (ex: supermarkets, etc.) - Affordable artist housing like they have in Beacon and Peekskill is in demand in the artists community. People who work in New York are unable to afford housing in Westchester but still want to be close to the creative centers in New York City - Like the idea of balancing living and commercial buildings 2 Page 5 of 15 Station 3 – Placemaking The Village was awarded $857,000 under the Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI) to beautify the Station Plaza neighborhood. The Village of Ossining will implement a variety of streetscaping enhancements with the aim of creating a cohesive sense of place and enhancing the connections between the Ossining Metro-North Railroad Station, the Station Plaza neighborhood, the waterfront, and the Main Street corridor. The project location includes the following streets within the Station Plaza neighborhood: Lower Main Street, Water Street, South Water Street, Depot Plaza, and Quimby Street. Specifically, the enhancements may include: • Introduction of stamped asphalt on South Water Street, in recognition of its historic character, • Asphalt resurfacing along Secor Road and Lower Main Street, • Sidewalk widening and creation of outdoor dining areas along Depot Plaza and Lower Main Street, • Redesign of median landscaping, planting of new trees, repair of a retaining wall, and installation of decorative fencing at Village-owned parking lots. What amenities would you like to see within the area of the DRI project, and where? - Landscaping (8) o More greenery/ trees (3) o Median landscaping decorative fencing (2) o Landscaping coastal erosion adaptation o For natural cooling o Sound dampening - Sidewalk widening/repairs (8) - Benches and/or “fun” seating, like swings (5) o Area by Depot Square - Enhancements especially outdoor dining (4) - More public parking (4) o Non-train station parking spots (2) o More 2hr time parking ( as opposed to station spots) - Easier pedestrian access/ pedestrian only areas (4) - Signage (3) o Pointing to upper main street/ things to do o Large enough to read and clear enough to follow without needing to re-read the sign - No more housing schools are bursting at seams (3) - Beautiful lighting (3) - Public art (2) - Encourage tourism especially with Haverstraw ferry expansion and future Singsing museum- some places people can shop, eat, drink, when visiting (2) - Put pressure on landlords with empty storefronts - More small businesses - Bike racks 3 Page 6 of 15 - EV charger for cars, fast chargers promote visiting the area by new people, promoting business - Bring diverse groups to Ossining. All kinds of people- so we need more diverse retail, no more of what we have. Some new and innovative businesses, and young people so that they can bring new ideas to Ossining and help build our future. - Physical accessibility should be top priority. - More cohesive feeling - Nice cocktail place to sit and hang out - Community pool (outdoors) - No more trees in the area, because the Village doesn’t prune them back - No more benches - Stamped asphalt seems like a meager “enhancement” and asphalt resurfacing should come from a different foundation source- it’s routine maintenance. But replacing asphalt with cobble or brick could add character and clam traffic - No outdoor dining of taking away parking - Resurface everything - Repair retaining wall - Bike lanes - Bus stop for shuttle from waterfront to Main Street - Information kiosk on “what to do” in Ossining up the hill - Townhomes/ apartment complex with garages - Permeable asphalt to prevent water build-up/ runoff is necessary down here - One-way streets - Traffic study on congestion - Walking path down Westerly Ave over bridge and back to other bridge/ waterfront Station 3 – Station Plaza Streetscaping ADD A STICKER IF YOU LIKE THE STREETSCAPING ELEMENT: Benches/Seating- 9 Votes Sidewalk Improvements- 17 Votes Lighting- 27 Votes Outdoor Dining Areas- 38 Votes Crosswalks- 2 Vote Bike racks- 10 Votes Tables- 7 Votes 4 Page 7 of 15 Greenspace/Sidewalk Plantings- 30 Votes Public Art- 28 Votes Other ideas? What uses would you like to see in the Station Plaza Streetscaping Project? Add a post it the use name/description here: - Work with Bethany Arts community or Arts Westchester for creation of public art (7) - No more benches (3) o Unless they are sectioned benches (2) - No hostile architecture - Basically all the above on the streetscape examples here, but lighting should be shielded for minimal light pollution/ wildlife interference - Plantings should incorporate green infrastructure/ stormwater management - More friendly safer outdoor dining, not just parking spaces (ex: Peekskill) - Atrium space with bars - Retractable stage - Book/ art stalls - Small theater to use for local productions by local artists - Good management team to ensure successful implementation of waterfront - Addressing homelessness instead of removing benches - Likes the idea of large scale public art but the budget for up keep is a concern - Likes public art and it can draw artists from other areas when there’s large scale public art installations - Additional EV charging stations especially on east side - Would prefer to see public art in a designated area instead of throughout the town unless is within a context of cultural identity - Tables offer places to sit would be helpful 5 Page 8 of 15 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between the HUDSON VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL, INC. (HVRC) a quasi-governmental non-profit corporation with offices at 105 Ann Street, #2, Newburgh, NY 12550 and CITY OF PEEKSKILL, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 840 Main Street, Peekskill, New York 10566; CITY OF WHITE PLAINS, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 255 Main Street, White Plains, New York 10601; TOWN OF AMENIA, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 4988 Route 22, Amenia, New York 12501, TOWN OF PLEASANT VALLEY, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 1554 Main Street, Pleasant Valley, New York 12569; TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, a municipal corporation with its principal office at Town Hall, 1 Overocker Road, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603; VILLAGE OF IRVINGTON, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 85 Main Street, Irvington, NY 10533; VILLAGE OF OSSINING, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 16 Croton Avenue, Ossining, New York 10562; VILLAGE OF RHINEBECK, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 76 East Market Street, Rhinebeck, New York 12572; VILLAGE OF TARRYTOWN, a municipal corporation with its principal office at One Depot Plaza, Tarrytown, New York, 10591; and VILLAGE OF WAPPINGERS FALLS, a municipal corporation with its principal office at 2582 South Avenue, Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 (Collectively known as, Coalition Members) . WHEREAS, HVRC submitted a coalition application as Lead Applicant to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Climate Pollution Reduction Grant (hereinafter “CPRG Grant Program”) for Mid-Hudson Municipal Building Electrification and WHEREAS, the Cities of Peekskill and White Plains, Towns of Amenia, Pleasant Valley, and Poughkeepsie, and Villages of Irvington, Ossining, Rhinebeck, Tarrytown, and Wappingers Falls joined the CPRG Grant application as Coalition Members, and 1. GLOSSARY: • CPRG: The Climate Pollution Reduction Grant Program is a program of the US Environmental Protection Agency to provide $5 billion in grants to states, local governments, tribes, and territories to develop and implement ambitious plans for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other harmful air pollution. Authorized under Section 60114 of the Inflation Reduction Act, this two-phase program provides $250 million for noncompetitive planning grants, and approximately $4.6 billion for competitive implementation grants. • Coalition: The Coalition refers to the group of municipalities participating in the CPRG Coalition Grant program to implement the Mid-Hudson Municipal Building Electrification Coalition Project. • Participant or Coalition Member Municipality refers to a participating member municipality that is part of the coalition. • Mid-Hudson Municipal Building Electrification Coalition Project: The Mid-Hudson Municipal Building Electrification Coalition Project refers to the project submitted to US EPA CPRG Program to reduce emissions in municipal buildings of the coalition, led by HVRC. • Grant Funds: See Total Project Budget. • HVRC: The Hudson Valley Regional Council developed the collaborative group learning model known as CAPI through its work on the NYSERDA Clean Energy Communities Program. HVRC partnered with Dutchess and Westchester Counties on the previous CAPI Grant Program application. HVRC facilitated and supported CAPI Participants in the development of individual 1 Page 9 of 15 government operations greenhouse gas inventories and climate action plans. HVRC is now leading the Mid-Hudson Municipal Building Electrification Coalition Project to support CAPI participants implementation of their climate action plans. • ICLEI: ICLEI refers to ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability USA, an international nongovernmental organization with programming that supports local governments with climate action planning. ICLEI membership will be provided to Coalition Members through this grant to ensure they can compare emissions modeled in their climate action plan with actual emissions reductions once the projects are implemented. • Lead Applicant: HVRC was the Lead Applicant on the Mid-Hudson Municipal Building Electrification Coalition application to the CPRG Program. HVRC is responsible for administration of award funds to be used for implementation of the Project as well as reporting on progress to the EPA, if the project is awarded, with supporting documentation provided by individual municipalities. • Total Project Budget: The Total Project Budget is comprised of Grant Funds allocated to each municipality for completion of their individual electrification project, to HVRC to manage the Project and support the municipalities, to Sustainable Westchester to assist the municipalities, and to ICLEI for modeling purposes. The individual municipalities Total Project Budgets were based on initial quotes received by the municipalities. The quotes were incorporated into HVRC’s CPRG application. 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS: The simplified MOA focuses on the proposed scope of work and Coalition Member responsibilities. It was drafted to ensure the coalition remains eligible for the Grant. If the coalition application is selected for funding, each Coalition Members’ signature affirms its intent to sign an updated and complete MOA based on the terms and conditions of the grant as stated by the EPA. The complete MOA shall be in a format and contain content that has been approved by the EPA to meet all terms and conditions of the grant award, and that has also been approved by all parties’ municipal counsel. Coalition Members’ signatures on the simplified MOA affirm our understanding that certain EPA terms and conditions may be non-negotiable. HVRC will be accountable to EPA and accepts full responsibility for effectively carrying out the full scope of work and the proper financial management of the grant. Coalition members who are grant subrecipients will be accountable to HVRC as lead applicant for proper use of EPA funding and successful project implementation. 3. PROGRAM CONTENT: • HVRC as Lead Applicant applied for a grant from the EPA CPRG Program for the implementation of the Mid-Hudson Municipal Building Electrification Coalition. The Total Project Budget is $9,306,402, comprised of Grant Funds. • HVRC as Lead Applicant requested $955,849 in Grant Funds to support the Project. • Each Coalition Member has grant funds earmarked for its implementation of a project based on the quote received before the application was submitted. The Total Project Budget for each Coalition Member is as follows: HVRC $955,849 2 Page 10 of 15 City of Peekskill $1,440,000 City of White Plains $2,576,549 Town of Amenia $314,933 Town of Pleasant Valley $658,878 Town of Poughkeepsie $334,950 Village of Irvington $1,000,000 Village of Ossining $375,734 Village of Rhinebeck $949,040 Village of Tarrytown $235,501 Village of Wappingers Falls $106,400 In addition to the budgets in the table above, HVRC will be sub awarding funds to Sustainable Westchester for their support to municipalities on these projects ($307,368). HVRC has also allocated funds ($51,200) for coalition members to have ICLEI memberships to maintain access to Clearpath for GHG Inventorying and Climate Action Planning efforts. • Coalition Member municipalities are responsible for any excess project costs beyond what was budgeted for in the grant application. Contingency was included to help alleviate potential burden on the municipality. • HVRC will work with Coalition Member municipalities to obtain and input energy data into ICLEI’s ClearPath Tool and Energy Star Portfolio Manager. 4. MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES: Additional responsibilities by Coalition Member and partners are below. Coalition member municipalities commit to the responsibilities. The responsibilities shall be facilitated and supported by HVRC: • HVRC will: o Manage grant contract, reporting, and reimbursement requests. o Make municipalities and Sustainable Westchester aware of EPA grant reporting requirements and procurement procedures. o Benchmark building(s) with assistance from municipality to acquire pre-construction project data to account for energy use intensity reductions of project. o Host an in-person event with Sustainable Westchester presenting to municipalities best practices on incorporating heat pumps (ground source and air source) in commercial buildings. o Host every other month cohort meetings in the first two years for municipalities. • Coalition Member Municipalities will: 3 Page 11 of 15 o In collaboration with HVRC, draft procurement documents for clean heating and cooling projects – including creation of scoring rubric, as well as incorporating grant requirements, such as Prevailing Wage and Build America Buy America Provisions, amongst others. o Finalize and publicize procurement documents, in accordance with Federal, State, and local laws, including all requirements of EPA such as prevailing wage and Build America Buy America provisions, in collaboration with HVRC and Sustainable Westchester, amongst others. o Review bids and select vendor for contract, in collaboration with HVRC . Said plans, specifications and bid documents shall be submitted to HVRC for review and approval prior to public bidding or the use of municipal labor. o Ensure contract aligns with EPA requirements, in collaboration with HVRC. Contact HVRC after the bid opening for review and approval of the bidding process and to verify the current eligibility status of the contractor or subcontractors prior to awarding the contract. o Manage project, ensuring contractor follows contract, in collaboration with HVRC. o Provide HVRC with information required for Semi-annual progress reports and a detailed final report. o Attend cohort meetings every other month for the first two years of the project. o Work with HVRC during the implementation process to ensure that the project is completed on time and as detailed in the contract. These points include project RFP and contracting as noted above, design review, installation review, monitoring and verification, and any variations outside of proposed design. o Make no modifications or alterations in the work scope or cost except upon written request and approval by HVRC. Such changes are to be incorporated into a written change order, which shall be signed by the municipality, the contractor, and HVRC. o Submit timely applications for progress payments. The application shall include an itemization for all monies paid by the municipality for labor performed and material supplied for the period covered by the application and a statement describing the work that was performed using such labor and materials. Progress payments will be issued upon approval by the Municipality, HVRC, and the EPA CPRG program. All amounts due and payable to the municipality for the work performed under this agreement shall be payable after the work is satisfactorily completed and a properly executed payment request form is submitted to HVRC. Said payment request form must be approved by HVRC and the EPA CPRG program. The municipality is responsible for making periodic visits to the site sufficient to be familiar with the progress and performance of the work. HVRC, EPA, and any or all authorized representatives of each, reserve the right to enter onto the project location and make periodic inspections. Said inspections are made solely for the purpose of assuring HVRC and EPA that the CPRG funds are being used in accordance with the agreement and are not made in an effort to inspect or assure the municipality that the work being performed is being done in accordance with any plans, specifications, and/or work write- ups, and thus no duty or obligation to the Municipality is created or implied by the same. 4 Page 12 of 15 3. TERMINATION: (a) By HVRC. HVRC may terminate this Agreement effective immediately, with subsequent written notice to be given to the Participant of termination with cause. For purposes of this Section 3, “cause” shall be defined as a breach of a material term of this Agreement by the Participant, which breach has not been cured (or substantially in the process of being cured) after written notice of the breach is given to the Participant, providing ten (10) days to cure the breach. Notice is deemed given upon delivery by HVRC. In the event of termination with cause, the Participant shall deliver to HVRC any or all drawings, specifications, reports and other data, records, materials and equipment in its custody or control pertaining to the Agreement and HVRC shall pay to the Participant all amounts due to the time of termination in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Such termination shall not give rise to any cause of action against HVRC for damages, loss of profits, expenses, or other remuneration of any kind. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if, termination is made necessary due to the Participant’s breach of a material term of this Agreement, HVRC may withhold payment of all or any part of moneys which otherwise may be payable to the Participant under this Agreement and apply such moneys toward any damages or expenses sustained by HVRC as a result of such failure including, without limitation, any excess costs incurred by HVRC in completing the services under this Agreement by the use or employment of other Participants or otherwise. A Participant’s liability under this Agreement shall be limited to the return of amounts up to the amount paid to Participant under this Agreement. (b) By a Participant. Any Participant may terminate its participation in the Coalition by providing thirty (30) days written notice to the other Participants and HVRC. A Participant’s liability under this Agreement shall be limited to the return of amounts up to the amount paid to Participant under this Agreement. No terminating Participant shall have any liability to any other Participant due to such termination, nor shall termination by a Participant be deemed a breach of a material term of this Agreement. 4. EXECUTORY: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, it is understood and agreed that this Agreement shall be deemed executory only to the extent of the moneys available to HVRC and the Coalition for the performance of the terms hereof and that, in the event that the HVRC Board or the various governing boards of the Coalition Members fail to appropriate the necessary funds to affect payment in any calendar year beyond the initial year herein, this Agreement shall automatically cease and terminate on the last day of the year in which funds have been appropriated for said Agreement and no liability on account thereof shall be incurred by HVRC or any Coalition Member beyond the funds available for the performance of this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that neither this Agreement nor any representation by any public employee or officer creates any legal or moral obligation to request, appropriate or make available moneys for the purpose of this Agreement. 5. NOTICE: Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, notice required to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be made in writing and addressed to the following or such other person as the parties may designate: 5 Page 13 of 15 Hudson Valley Regional Council Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 105 Ann Street, #2 Newburgh, NY 12550 Village of Irvington Attn: Mayor City of Peekskill 85 Main Street Attn: Mayor Irvington, NY 10533 840 Main Street Peekskill, New York 10566 Village of Ossining Attn: Mayor City of White Plains 16 Croton Avenue Attn: Mayor Ossining, New York 10562 255 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601 Village of Rhinebeck Attn: Mayor Town of Amenia 76 East Market Street Attn: Supervisor Rhinebeck, NY 12572 4988 Route 22 Amenia, NY 12501 Village of Tarrytown Attn: Mayor Town of Pleasant Valley One Depot Plaza Attn: Supervisor Tarrytown, New York, 10591 1554 Main Street Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 Village of Wappingers Falls Attn: Mayor Town of Poughkeepsie 2582 South Avenue Attn: Supervisor Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 1 Overocker Road 6. COUNTERPARTS; SIGNATURES TRANSMITTED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one agreement, and any of the parties hereto may execute this Agreement by signing any such counterpart. A facsimile or signature transmitted by electronic means applied hereto or to any other document shall have the same force and effect as a manually signed original. This provision contemplates giving legal force and effect to copies of signatures. This provision does not contemplate the use of “electronic signatures” as regulated by New York State Technology Law Article 3, “Electronic Signatures and Records Act.” 7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: The terms of this Agreement, including its attachments and exhibits represent the final intent of the parties. Any modification, rescission, or waiver of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and executed and acknowledged by the parties with the same formalities accorded this basic Agreement. WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Agreement made this ____ day of ______, 2024. 6 Page 14 of 15 HUDSON VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE _________________________________ _________________________________ Carla Castillo, Executive Director CITY OF PEEKSKILL VILLAGE OF IRVINGTON _________________________________ _________________________________ CITY OF WHITE PLAINS VILLAGE OF OSSINING _________________________________ _________________________________ TOWN OF AMENIA VILLAGE OF RHINEBECK _________________________________ _________________________________ TOWN OF PLEASANT VALLEY VILLAGE OF TARRYTOWN _________________________________ _________________________________ VILLAGE OF WAPPINGERS FALLS _________________________________ 7 Page 15 of 15

Get email alerts for Ossining

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting