Planning Commission
Regular MeetingPlacerville, CA · January 4, 2022
Minutes
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, January 4, 2022, 6:00 P.M.
TOWN HALL, 549 MAIN STREET, PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA
CLOSED SESSION: None Scheduled
6:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG:
Chair Lepper called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
was recited.
2. ROLL CALL: Frenn; Vice Chair Gotberg; Kiehne; Chair Lepper; List
Members Present: Frenn; Vice Chair Gotberg; Kiehne; Chair Lepper; List
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: City Manager Morris; City Engineer Neves; Development Services
Director Rivas; I.T. Director Tanger
3. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
None scheduled
4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Motion: In a single motion Commissioner Kiehne, second by Vice Chair Gotberg, moved to
approve the Agenda and Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0 vote.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
5.1 Approve the Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of December 21,
2021
Motion: In a single motion Commissioner Kiehne, second by Vice Chair Gotberg, moved to
approve the Agenda and Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0 vote.
6. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
No items were pulled from the Consent Calendar.
7. ITEMS OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC (PUBLIC COMMENT) - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None received
8. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None received
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 1 of 17
9. PRESENTATION AND EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOP SESSIONS
None
10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
11. CONTINUED ITEMS
11.1 3001 Jacquier Road – Site Plan Review 21-03, Variance 21-01 & Variance 21-02, and
Environmental Assessment 21-01 (Continued from December 21, 2022):
Consideration of a Site Plan Review and Variance requests by Apple Hill Hospitality LLC,
Applicant, and Brett Miller – Eat.Drink.Sleep, Developer.
• Site Plan Review for a 106 room hotel including: meeting facilities, guest dining, parking,
landscaping and miscellaneous roadway improvements;
• Variance request to allow an average building height of 46 feet 7 inches in lieu of 40 feet
in a Highway Commercial Zone; and
• Parking variance to allow a total of 44% compact parking stalls in lieu of 20%.
The subject site is 3.01 acres generally located north of the intersection of Highway 50 and
Point View Drive between Cardinal Drive and Smith Flat Road. Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 048-
290-042 (hotel) and -044 (parking); and 2821 Jacquier Road, Assessor’s Parcel No. 048-210-
038, a 13.71 acre site to contain a 6.6 acre storm water detention basin.
Director Rivas presented the staff report dated December 21, 2021, the staff report dated
January 4, 2022, and the Addendum to the staff report’s dated December 21, 2021 and
January 4, 2022. Applicant Steve Smith and Brett Miller provided a project presentation and
addressed the Commission.
Written comments received from Maggie and Paul Bush, Madrona Vinyards; and Sue Taylor
(email); and were distributed at the meeting.
Public Speakers: Jody Franklin; Laurel Brent-Bumb; Barry Batchelor; Kara Sather; Leonard
Grado; John Clerici; John Conforti; Janet Kelly; Russ Reyes.
Motion by Kiehne seconded by List to make the findings and conditionally approve SPR 21-03,
VAR 21-01 and VAR 21-02; as recommended in the staff report dated December 21, 2021, the
staff report dated January 4, 2022, and the Addendum to the staff report’s dated December
21, 2021 and January 4, 2022; with the following modifications: (1) adding Condition 59
directing staff to forward the project to the Airport Land Use Commission determination; (2)
adding Condition 60 requiring a reciprocal parking covenant; and (3) adding Condition A.1.v
directing the applicant to consult with staff to reconfigure parking to meet the intent of City’s
parking regulations, and bring back to the Planning Commissions the revised site plan for
review and approval .
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 2 of 17
1. Make the following General Plan consistency Findings:
A. This request is consistent with the Highway Commercial General Plan Land Use
Designation that is designed to provide for the highway-oriented uses such as fast-
food restaurants, gas stations, hotels and other uses that are convenient for the
traveling public, in that a hotel is a highway-oriented use that would cater to
travelers along Highway 50.
B. The project provides for the development of Highway Commercial facilities
concentrated in well-defined and well-designated areas and the project
differentiates highway and travel-oriented uses from those in the downtown
business district and other commercial areas.
C. This request is consistent with General Plan Land Use Element Goal C that states,
“To protect and provide for the expansion of Placerville’s commercial services sector
to meet the needs of both Placerville area residents and visitors”; and
Policy 9 that states,
“The City’s planning for commercial areas shall be guided by the following
principals: a) Contribute to the City’s objective to become a balanced community;
b) Have a positive economic impact on the community; c) Provide for adequate
parking and vehicular access; and, d) Be designed and landscaped in a manner
sensitive to Placerville’s character”, in that the project has been designed in a
foothill theme, has adequate parking and vehicle access, and will have a positive
impact on the community through sales and transient occupancy taxes.
D. This request is consistent with Goal A of the Transportation Element that states,
“To provide a circulation system that is correlated and adequate to support existing
and proposed land uses, thereby providing for the efficient movement of goods and
services within and through Placerville.”
E. This project is consistent with General Plan Transportation Element Goal ‘E’ that
states: “To provide a safe and secure bicycle route system,” in that the project
provides a bicycle route; and
Policy 3, which states, “The City shall limit on-street bicycle routes to those streets
where the available roadway width and traffic volumes permit safe coexistence of
bicycle and motor vehicle traffic”; and
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 3 of 17
Policy 5, which states, “The City shall promote the development of bicycle routes in
major development areas and along railroad rights-of-way.”
F. This project is consistent with the General Plan Transportation Element Goal ‘F’ that
states, “To promote convenient and safe pedestrian circulation”; and
Policy 3, which states, “In approving development projects, the City shall continue to
require the construction of sidewalks connecting major pedestrian destinations, such
as schools, hospitals, and government centers,” inasmuch as this project
accommodates pedestrian circulation both on- and off-site and provides a
connection to the El Dorado Trail.
G. The proposed Jacquier Road extension meets the intent of the General Plan’s
“Master Street Plan,” in that the road’s location and alignment is consistent with the
Plan.
2. Make the following findings in accordance with CEQA Section 15162 that the use of the
previously prepared Negative Declaration for the Gateway Hotel and Gas Station Project
Addendum dated May 11, 2004 used for the Hampton Inn and Suites Project approved
January 17, 2017 is appropriate based on the following findings as supported by evidence
in the record:
(1) No substantial changes are proposed in the project with respect to the previously
approved Holiday Inn Express project and the Hampton Inn and Suites project, which will
require major revisions of the previous negative declaration due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects.
(2) No substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous negative
declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
(3) No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous negative declaration.
(B) No significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous MND.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 4 of 17
(C) No identified mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be
feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative.
(D) No mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the previous MND would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative.
3. Make the following findings for Site Plan Review 21-03:
A. The project design is consistent, as conditional, with the objectives and criteria set
forth in the Site Plan Review Ordinance and supporting Development Guide in that
the building design meets the intent of providing ‘Foothill/Mountain’ architectural
features and is consistent with development features including signage, landscaping
and lighting.
4. Make the following findings for Variance 21-01 (building height):
A. The project is designated on the General Plan Land Use Map as Highway
Commercial.
B. The Project is zoned HWC (Highway Commercial Zone) and AO (Airport Overlay).
C. Due to existing site constraints of topography there are unique physical
characteristics specific to the project site, therefore, the granting of the variance
allowing for an average building height of 46 feet 7 inches and a maximum of 53
feet in lieu of 40 feet maximum height does not constitute a special privilege not
enjoyed by others in the vicinity or in the same zone as the project.
5. Make the following findings for Variance 21-02 (compact parking spaces):
A. The project is designated on the General Plan Land Use Map as Highway
Commercial.
B. The Project is zoned HWC (Highway Commercial Zone) and AO (Airport Overlay).
C. Due to existing site constraints of topography there are unique physical
characteristics specific to the project site, therefore, the granting of the variance
allowing for 37% parking spaces to be compact in lieu of a maximum of 20% does
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 5 of 17
not constitute a special privilege not enjoyed by others in the vicinity or in the same
zone as the project.
6. Approve SPR 21-03, VAR 21-01 and VAR 21-02 subject to the Conditions of Approval
provided as follows:
A. Development Services Department Conditions of Approval:
1. Submit revised plans to staff for review and approval by the Planning
Commission to include:
i. The “Site Details” plan shall show the method of physical materials and
landscape screening for all exterior mechanical equipment, and
indicate location and method of screening of proposed propane tank(s).
ii. The “Site Details” plan shall be modified to comply with AB 1383
requiring a dedicated food waste collection bin. The proposed trash
enclosures shall be subject to the review of El Dorado Disposal.
iii. The Landscape Plan shall be modified as directed by staff, subject to
final approval by the Planning Commission and parking lot tree
plantings to provide 50% shading at 15 years.
iv. Applicant shall submit a Landscape Maintenance Agreement in
accordance with Code to staff for recordation prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
v. Applicant shall consult with staff and submit a revised site plan
showing all proposed parking stalls meeting the intent of the City’s
parking regulations subject to final approval of the Planning
Commission.
2. Submit revised plans to staff subject to the review and approval of the
Planning Commission to include:
i. A revised sign plan meeting the sign regulations per City Code Section
10-4-17 and the Chapter XIII of the Placerville Development Guide.
ii. An exterior lighting plan meeting the exterior lighting regulations per
City Code Section 10-4-16 and Chapter XI of the Placerville
Development Guide.
3. Submit three complete construction copies of the proposed building projects.
The building should be designed to meet all the 2019 California Building,
Plumbing, Mechanical, and Fire Codes. The existing site will need to be
reviewed by the project soils engineer in conjunction with the project engineer.
4. The existing foundation will need to be removed or reviewed by project
engineer if it is to be used, whole or partial. A demolition permit will be
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 6 of 17
required if removed to include a waste management program for the disposal
of the concrete and structural steel.
5. This Site Development project shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances
and City standard street cross-section details available at the office of the City
Engineer. All remaining Development Services and Engineering Department
improvements, except for sewer and water, will be designed in accordance
with the County of El Dorado Design and Improvement Standards Manual, as
revised May 18, 1990; the County of El Dorado Drainage Manual, dated March
14, 1995; and the 2010 State of California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) Standard Plans and Standard Specifications. Sewer service will be
provided by the City and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with
El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) Design and Construction Standards, dated
July 1999, except when otherwise directed by the City Engineer. Water
distribution is within the EID service area and shall comply with EID standards
and conditions of approval as follows:
i. An updated Facilities Improvement Letter (FIL) is required including a
current Fire Flow Letter from the Fire District.
ii. Layouts of waterlines are conceptual until improvement plans are
approved by EID. Review by EID to be done concurrently with the City
and the Fire District. Locations of fire hydrants and FDC are subject to
the Fire District review and approval.
iii. Applicant shall open an EID Development Services project subject to
fees. Applicant shall provide direct submittals to EID.
iv. Applicant shall adhere to the comments submitted for this project
dated November 29, 2021.
6. The Applicant shall reimburse the City for associated project costs incurred by
the City for any outside consultants, City staff time, and other expenses for
special design needs above and beyond normal items covered by the City’s fee
schedule.
7. Appropriate land rights shall be obtained from the affected property owners as
necessary to allow any required grading and/or facilities to be installed outside
the site plan boundaries. A copy of the written authorization(s) shall be
included with the final improvement plan submittal.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 7 of 17
8. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineering Division
prior to beginning any work on this development within a public right-of-way
or easement.
9. All Capital and Impact Fees are to be calculated and paid at time of Building
Permit issuance.
i. The Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee (TIM) will be based on the minor
commercial rate at the time the plan check submittal is deemed
complete, less credits for previous payments for this development.
ii. Sewer connection fees will be calculated using a rate of 0.6 EDU per
room for the hotel. City records indicate that $82,750 was paid
previously in Sewer Connection Fees.
iii. Water connection fees will be calculated by and paid directly to EID
iv. The School District and Fire District shall be consulted for submittal
review processes and any fees related to their services.
10. Applicant is required to submit for review and pay appropriate fees as required
by EID. Water system work must be approved by EID prior to the start of
construction.
11. The required water system, including all fire hydrants, shall be installed and
accepted by EID and the El Dorado County Fire Protection District prior to any
combustible building material being placed on site.
12. Improvements shall comply with Fire District requirements, including locations
and spacing of fire hydrants, building sprinkler requirements, fire flows, and
traffic and emergency circulation.
13. Compliance with EID project conditions is required.
14. City records indicate that the water system has been installed and is connected
to the EID system in Jacquier Road west of approximately Sta. 20+50. There is
no indication on plans or city records showing water line work east of that
point as required on the original design plans. All work required by EID that
requires trenching into existing pavement will require a full pavement overlay
and new striping in any areas where a final lift of new pavement was
constructed by the City Point View Drive construction project will require a full
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 8 of 17
width 2” grind and 2” pavement overlay and new thermoplastic striping. The
limits requiring a full width 2” grind and 2” pavement overlay is anticipated to
be between Smith Flat Road (west) and Smith Flat Road (east).
15. A meter award letter or similar document from EID shall be provided by the
applicant prior to receiving a building permit.
16. A grease interceptor system is required for the sewer system leaving all kitchen
or food prep areas; location, type, and installation shall meet City and EID
standards or as directed by the City Engineer and Building Official. Review of
the grease interceptor shall be at plan check.
17. Portions of the planned sewer main from its connection to the 10” line in Smith
Flat Road (west) upstream to its planned termination at Sta. 17+09 were
installed as part of this developments original design and construction. A CCTV
survey of this line and an air test are required before this main will be accepted
into the City collection system. Any portions of the line that do not pass
inspection or have not been completed must be constructed to City standards.
The City will accept the sewer main into the City maintained system after this
work is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
18. Perform a CCTV survey of the two sewer laterals previously constructed to
serve the hotel and the gas station. These are private laterals, but must be
constructed (or proven to have been constructed) to City standards prior to
being utilized.
19. Provide sewer backwater valve installation per EID standards or protect with
other method as approved by the City Engineer.
20. The City’s sewer master plan study completed in 2006 identifies potential
capacity concerns located downstream between Wiltse Road and the Spanish
Ravine-Main Street intersection. The City completed the sewer improvements
for 500 feet of the 2,000 foot section of pipeline as part of the Blairs Lane
Bridge project in 2016, leaving 1,500 feet remaining. The City is planning to
construct sewer capacity improvements from 1244 Broadway to Mosquito
Road-Main Street as part of an upcoming City project. The applicant shall
enter into an agreement with the City where this project’s sewer connection
fees would be considered their fair share of those capacity improvements that
allow for construction of the remaining 1,500 feet of sewer.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 9 of 17
21. Prior to final design of storm drainage systems for the project, a copy of the
prior approved project Drainage Report shall be submitted to the City Engineer
for review. The plans and prior approved Drainage Report shall match in
content and intent to include all aspects of drainage as discussed herein. The
approved Drainage Report will serve as a design guide for the projects
drainage system(s) and reflected in the improvement plans.
22. Drainage facilities shall be designed and included in the final improvement
plan submittal. Drainage and detention facilities shall be designed and
constructed to keep post-development flows leaving the site at or below pre-
development levels, including increased drainage from public roadway
construction. Drainage calculations will be required to show that these
conditions are being met. Changes to historical and existing drainage patterns
will not be allowed without specific City approval. All areas of concentrated
drainage flow shall be contained in a pipeline or improved channel to a City-
approved discharge point. Plans for the original development, as well as
application materials and correspondence with the Army Corps of Engineers
indicate the original developer’s intent to develop an off-site drainage
retention system that would meet the requirement of keeping post-
development flows in Hangtown Creek at or below pre-development levels.
City records and development plans do not indicate that plans for this system
were ever fully calculated or developed. This development’s drainage
calculations and plan shall account for drainage from the adjacent “gas
station/country market” parcel as proposed in the original development plan
and environmental document for these parcels.
23. Construction of the detention pond to be located off-site on Assessor’s Parcel
Number 048-210-038 is subject to permitting through the County of El Dorado
and subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Said pond shall be
permitted, constructed, and functional prior to issuance of the building permit.
An easement or other legal obligation shall be recorded to retain the required
volume of storm water detention in said pond in perpetuity and shall be
provided to the City subject to review and approval by the City attorney and
prior to the Certificate of Occupancy.
24. The Smith Flat Point View project was permitted by the Corps of Engineers at
the project location on September 14, 2007. No further review or action by the
Corps is required if the project stays within the limits of the original permit
(SPK-2002-00319) as articulated in the December 13, 2021 comment letter
from the Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 10 of 17
25. All parking lot and street drainage inlets shall be marked medallions or marker
stating “Do not Dump – Flows to Creek” as approved by the City Engineer.
26. Interceptor ditches are required at the top of all slopes and retaining walls or
as directed by the City Engineer. Water collected by this ditch shall be taken to
a drainage system.
27. Drainage swales or concentrated lot drainage is not allowed to sheet flow
across sidewalks.
28. Storm drain pipes shall be RCP, HDPE, or other materials as approved by the
City Engineer.
29. The storm drain system designed in Jacquier Road appears by visual inspection
to have been completed to the extent necessary to handle existing site and
roadway drainage. Plans, city records, and visual inspection indicate that
storm drainage systems shown on the off-site plans have been constructed in
the existing full pavement areas west and east of the proposed development
(everywhere except between Sta. 12 + 20 and Sta. 21 + 50). As status of the
on-site drainage systems is unknown, the applicant shall fully investigate and
substantiate the location and quality of the existing on site systems prior to
submittal of improvement plans to the City.
30. All existing on-site and off-site storm drain systems constructed as part of the
original project construction and planned to remain in use shall be inspected
by CCTV survey to verify acceptability. Any problems identified shall be
corrected to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
31. As a required compliance measure to the City’s MS4 permit (§E.12), this
development is required to implement the use of Low Impact Design
Standards. A list of potential measures is provided in the latest update of the
City’s Development Guide.
32. Electric, telephone, and cable TV shall be placed underground within the
project boundary and where connections are made to existing overhead
facilities.
33. City records and visual inspection suggest much of the dry utility systems
mainline components are in place, and that PG&E power may be available at
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 11 of 17
the large utility box near Sta. 17+00. Utility companies must be contacted to
confirm what additional design work needs to be completed prior to submittal
of the final improvement plans to the City. A utility composite plan shall
identify the utility work necessary to service this development and
development of the adjacent parcel.
34. JACQUIER ROAD: Design and Construct Jacquier Road between Sta. 12 + 13
and Sta. 21 + 50 (approximate) to provide curbs and gutters, 4.5 foot sidewalk
along project frontage, 4 foot HMA bike lanes in each direction, and an 11
foot travel lane in each direction.
35. From Sta. 21 + 50 (approx.) to Smith Flat Road (east) complete the roadway
improvements on the south side including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and roadway
widening to provide similar 11 foot through lanes, and bike lanes in both
directions. A portion of this roadway construction area is under El Dorado
County jurisdiction and requires plan submittal and review along with
inspection. Similar plans from the previous project were reviewed and
approved by El Dorado County DOT.
36. Roadway Improvements west of Sta. 12 + 13 and east of Sta. 24 (approx.) are
considered by the City to be complete, and have been approved by Caltrans
and El Dorado County.
37. The final structural section of Jacquier Road roadway shall be 4”HMA/13” AB
(existing roadway structural section between Sta. 12 + 75 and Sta. 21 + 50 was
constructed at 2”/13”, with the original developer planning to add the final 2”
HMA lift at the end of construction). This project shall complete the 2” HMA
overlay or enter into an agreement with the City to contribute an equivalent
amount of the construction costs of the 2” HMA overlay should the City desire
to make additional improvements.
38. Between approximately Sta. 19 and Sta. 21 + 50 the south side of the existing
structural section is failing and repair will be required. Provide geotechnical
engineer review of this failed area with recommendations for repair for review
and approval by the City Engineer prior to proceeding with any roadway work
in this area. As per prior approvals, the development will be required to fulfill
their commitment of a 2” HMA overlay or provide their share of repair
equivalent to a 2” HMA overlay.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 12 of 17
39. Some Keystone Retaining wall blocks are missing from the top of the Keystone
Wall on the north/west side of Jacquier Road. This wall is part of the
construction for this development and as such must be maintained throughout
construction. The wall is required to be certified by a registered structural
engineer that it was constructed in accordance with their plans and
requirements and meets with their approval, otherwise an analysis of the
existing structure shall be included in the required geotechnical report as
discussed under “Grading” below.
40. A fall protection structure designed by a structural engineer is required at the
top of the wall to protect vehicles and from going over the top of the wall. A
structure has been designed previously, and revising to a different design must
take the wall design and its tiebacks into consideration. The final design of the
vehicle and/or bicyclist barrier will need to be reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer.
41. Sidewalks shall be 5’ separated sidewalk to the greatest extent possible.
Where the sidewalk must be adjacent to street curb and gutter due to site
constraints the sidewalk width may be a minimum width of 4.5’. Sidewalks
shall provide a continuous walkway between the existing sidewalk on the
south side at Point View Drive, down to the Smith Flat Road (east) intersection.
42. Parking, accessible stalls, and Fire District turnaround shall comply with City of
Placerville Standard Plans and must have Fire District approval.
43. Install a street light matching nearest adjacent public street lights at the Point
View Drive/Jacquier Road intersection on Point View Drive where an existing
grey conduit is seen sticking out of the ground. This conduit reportedly runs
from a PG&E service box to this location. The intent of this light location is to
light the Cardinal Drive/Point View Drive intersection area, which had lighting
prior to earlier phases of this development project.
44. Install street lights at the Smith Flat Road (east) intersection as shown on the
existing plans and as required by the County.
45. Provide signing and striping plans and install signing and striping for the
project as required by the City Engineer. All off-site striping shall be
thermoplastic. The applicant will be responsible for all costs.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 13 of 17
46. BUS STOP: A bus stop shall be provided in accordance with EDCTA standards
and requirements. A pullout will not be required. Contact the EDCTA for
determination of location and type of shelter required.
47. A parcel map shall be filed to document final parcel boundaries that were
created with previous lot line adjustments, records of survey, grant deeds,
offers of dedication, and possibly other recorded documents that affect
property line locations. Most, if not all, of the details of this required parcel
map were contained in a draft Parcel Map submitted to the City dated August,
2007 by Carlton Engineering, and also submitted to El Dorado County Surveyor
for plan checking, but final plan checking and filing of the map was not
completed. Subsequently, offers of dedication were made and accepted by the
City in 2010 as evidenced by City Offers of Dedication numbers 465 through
468 in City Engineering Files.
48. All grading shall conform to the City Grading Ordinance and to all other
relevant laws, rules, and regulations governing grading in the City of
Placerville. Mass grading has been completed. Prior to commencing any
grading, which includes 50 or more cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a
grading permit from the Engineering Department.
49. All retaining walls shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to
construction, including material types, colors, and surface finishes.
50. Submit final geotechnical report for this development with recommendations
for the construction of building pads, retaining walls, sub-drains and
roadways.
51. The improvement plans shall include an erosion and sediment control plan,
which incorporates standard erosion control practices and best management
practices, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The plan shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer or Certified Professional Hydrologist in
accordance with the High Sierra Resource Conservation and Development
Council Guidelines for Erosion and Sediment Control, and shall be included in
an agreement with the construction contractor prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. The following measures shall be included:
i. Any mass grading shall be restricted to dry weather periods between
April 1 and October 31.
ii. If other grading activity is to be undertaken in wet-weather months,
permanent erosion and sediment controls shall be in place by October
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 14 of 17
15, and construction shall be limited to areas as approved by the City
Engineer. A winterization plan must be submitted by September 15
and implemented by October 15.
iii. In the event construction activity including clearing, grading,
disturbances to the ground, such as stockpiling, or excavation result in
soil disturbances of at least one acre of total land area, the applicant
shall obtain and provide a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).
iv. Should a NOI be required, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) shall be provided prior to issuing a construction permit in
accordance with requirements set forth by the RWQCB.
v. Project less than one acre are exempt from obtaining a NOI unless
construction activity is expected to create soil disturbances that could
cause significant water quality impairment.
vi. The internet site for information and application on the NOI can be
found at
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/stormwtr/docs/finalconstpermit.pdf
vii. Sedimentation basins, traps, or similar BMP controls shall be installed
prior to the start of grading.
viii. Mulching, hydro seeding, or other suitable revegetation measures shall
be implemented. Planting shall also occur on areas of cut and fill to
reduce erosion and stabilize exposed areas of later construction phases.
All disturbed areas with a slope greater than 5% shall receive erosion
control.
ix. Excavated materials shall not be deposited or stored where the
materials could be washed away by storm water runoff.
52. The improvement plans shall include a dust control plan, which takes all
necessary measures to control dust. This plan shall be implemented by the
Developer during grading as required by the City and the El Dorado County Air
Quality Management District (AQMD). A permit from AQMD shall be
submitted to the Development Services Department prior to approval of the
improvement plans.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 15 of 17
53. Graded slopes shall be limited to a maximum steepness ratio of 2:1 (horizontal
to vertical) unless otherwise approved by the geotechnical engineer.
54. Obtain proper permits prior to demolition or grading of any hazardous
materials, underground storage tanks, mines, tunnels, shafts, septic systems,
water wells, graves, or other existing underground utilities or unforeseen
features. Requirement to obtain additional permits shall be clearly stated on
the grading plans.
55. The proposed grading plan shows an import of fill material. Prior to obtaining
a grading permit the applicant shall have obtained approval for the import
location (borrow site) from the City Engineer. An Environmental Assessment
shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval and shall include the
borrow site information.
56. City restrictions related to noise and work hours shall be clearly stated on the
Cover Sheet for the final improvement and/or grading plans.
57. Existing trees to be protected and the protection measures to be installed or
observed during site grading and trenching operations shall be clearly
delineated on the final improvement plans.
58. The project is subject to the Mitigation Measures and the Mitigation
Monitoring Plan contained in the previously adopted environmental document
known as the “Gateway Hotel and Gas Station Project Addendum to the
Mitigated Negative Declaration – City of Placerville,” dated May 11, 2004.
59. The Zoning Variance Request Application (VAR 21-01) to allow for increased
height shall be referred to the El Dorado County Airport Land Use Commission
for Land Use Action Review for determination of consistency with the 2012
Placerville ALUCP. The applicant shall record an avigation and noise easement
prior to occupancy.
60. A reciprocal parking covenant for use of the parking lot area on the adjoining
parcel, Assessor’s Parcel No. 048-290-042, shall be recorded prior to
occupancy.
B. Comply with El Dorado Irrigation District’s Conditions of Approval as stated in the
attached letter dated November 29, 2021(Attachment 5)
C. Comply with El Dorado County Air Quality Management District’s Conditions of
Approval as stated in the attached letter dated December 2, 2021(Attachment 5)
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 16 of 17
D. Comply with the Corps of Engineer’s Conditions of Approval as stated in the attached
letter dated December 13, 2021
E. Comply with the El Dorado County Environmental Management Department
Conditions of Approval as stated in the attached letter dated December 13, 2021
(Attachment 5)
Action: Motion approved 5-0 on roll call vote:
Ayes: Frenn, Vice Chair Gotberg, Kiehne, Chair Lepper, List
Nays: None
NEW BUSINESS
None
MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF
Director Rivas requested the email addresses of each Commissioner to update staff’s contact
information.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Lepper adjourned the meeting at 8:58 p.m.
_________________________________
Pierre Rivas, Director
Development Services Department
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes of January 4, 2022
Approved March 1, 2022
Page 17 of 17
Agenda
PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, January 4, 2022, 6:00 p.m.
Town Hall – 549 Main Street
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
Michael Frenn
Nicole Gotberg, Vice Chair
Kris Kiehne
Amy Lepper, Chair
John List
CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING
I declare that the foregoing Agenda for the January 4, 2022, Regular Meeting of the Placerville Planning
Commission was posted and available for review on December 30, 2021 at the City Hall of the City of
Placerville, 3101 Center Street, Placerville, CA 95667. The Agenda is also available on the City website at:
www.cityofplacerville.org
Pierre Rivas, Development Services Department Director
Information and Procedures Concerning Planning Commission Meetings
Meeting Dates: The Commission meets regularly on the first
and third Tuesday of each month at Town Hall in the City Consent Calendar: All matters listed under the Consent
Council Chambers; additional meetings may be scheduled as Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by
needed. general consent, unless any Commissioner requests a roll call
vote, or unless any member of the Commission or Staff or
Meeting Access: The City of Placerville wishes to make all of audience wishes to remove an item for discussion.
its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request,
this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative Information Available: Materials related to items on this
formats to persons with disabilities, as required by 42 U.S.C. Agenda, submitted to the Planning Commission either with or
§12132 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any after distribution of the agenda packet, are available for
person with a disability who requires a modification or public review without delay in the Development Services
accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should Department at City Hall, 3101 Center Street, 2nd floor, during
direct such request to the City Clerk (530)642-5531 at least 72 normal business hours. Agendas and Staff Reports are also
hours before the meeting, if possible. made available online at the Planning Commission Agenda
webpage.
Governing Regulations and Rules: The Commission conducts
all meetings in accordance with the "Ralph M. Brown Act" Items of Interest to the Public – Non-Agenda Items: This
(California Government Code Sections 54950, et seq.), per the portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to
City's Committee, Commissions & Board Policy Manual (City address the Commission on any matter not on the Agenda
Council Resolution No. 7578), and the Planning Commission and the subject matter is within the jurisdiction of the Planning
Bylaws. Commission. State law prohibits the Commission from acting
on items not listed on the Agenda except by special action of
Use of Cell Phones During Meetings: The Planning the Planning Commission under specified circumstances. The
Commission appreciates your cooperation in turning off all Chair will recognize the speaker. The Chair reserves the right
cell phones. to limit the speaker’s time to three minutes. Personal attacks
Planning Commission Agenda
January 4, 2022 Page 1 of 4
nd
on individuals or comments that are slanderous or that may Department, City Hall – 2 Floor, 3101 Center Street. The
invade an individual’s personal privacy will not be tolerated. Planning Commission may not have sufficient time to fully
review written materials presented at the public hearing.
Written Communications-Non-Agenda Items: Written Interested parties are encouraged to provide written
Communication items are written comments received on materials at least seven (7) days prior to the public hearing to
non-agenda items pertaining to business within the allow distribution with the Planning Commission’s agenda
jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. These are not items packet to provide adequate time for review by the Planning
for discussion but can be referred to staff for consideration. Commission. Please be aware that, while these comments
will be provided to the members of the Commission and will
Public Hearings: Applicants (or appellants) are allowed time become part of the public record, they will not be read aloud.
to present testimony at the beginning of the public hearing, Planning Commission after distribution of the agenda packet
and if needed, an opportunity to present rebuttal at the end is available for public inspection in the Development Services
of the public hearing. All other speakers may be limited in the Department at 3101 Center Street, 2nd Floor, Placerville, CA
length of time speaking, at the discretion of the Chair. 95667 during normal business hours.
Public Participation Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
Public participation in the hearing process is encouraged. Any aggrieved person or persons dissatisfied with a Planning
Commission decision may appeal that decision to the City
Please step up to the podium microphone then wait to be Council within 10 calendar days. Per Government Code
recognized by the Chair before speaking at the podium when Section 65009, if any person(s) challenges the action of the
addressing the Commission. Planning Commission, said person(s) may be limited to raising
only those issues that were raised at the public hearing
Each speaker will be asked to voluntarily state his/her name described in this notice, or in written correspondence
before speaking. Address the Planning Commission Chair delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the
with all testimony and questions. Please do not address the public hearing.
applicant, members of the public or staff.
Appeal Period
The Commission and City staff will ensure order and decorum There is a 10 calendar day appeal period for Planning
during all Commission meetings. Persons demonstrating Commission decisions. Appeals can be made by any inter-
rude, boisterous or profane behavior will be called to order ested party by submittal of a written appeal request and
by the Chair. If such conduct continues, the Chair may call a appeal fee to the Placerville City Clerk, 3101 Center Street,
recess, requesting the removal of such person(s) from the Placerville, California, 95667.
Council Chamber, adjourn the meeting or take other
appropriate action. Matters from Commissioners and Staff: This item is for staff
to update those in attendance of the status of upcoming
Agree or disagree respectfully. Please, no applause, or booing meetings; of recent actions taken by City Council on items
or personal attacks. Please take personal discussions out of previously considered by the Commission; of the status or
the Town Hall chambers so as not to disturb others or disrupt completion of City and community projects; of community-
the public hearing. wide activities and events (e.g. Brewfest, National Night Out,
Wagon Train, etc.). For Commission Members this time is for
Time Limit updating other Members of sub-committee work (when
Presentations should be limited to a maximum of three (3) applicable); of updating other Members of topics and issues
minutes, unless otherwise determined by the Chair. learned at land use and planning conferences, workshops,
A speaker may not defer his/her time to other speakers. webinars; general comments regarding planning and land use
within Placerville, or other items which may be within the
Groups or organizations are encouraged to select a purview of the Planning Commission.
spokesperson to speak on their behalf. Each subsequent
speaker is encouraged to submit new information, rather
than repeating comments made by prior speakers.
Written Public Comment Instructions to Become Part of the
Record
If you wish to provide comment you may e-mail your com-
ments to pv.planning@gmail.com, or you may submit your
comments in-person at the Development Services
Planning Commission Agenda
January 4, 2022 Page 2 of 4
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2022, 6:00 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION
● None scheduled
______________________________________________________________________________
6:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
2. ROLL CALL: Frenn, Vice Chair Gotberg, Kiehne, Chair Lepper, List
3. CLOSED SESSION REPORT (if applicable)
4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
5.1 Approve the Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of December 7,
2021
6. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR (if applicable)
7. ITEMS OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC – NON-AGENDA ITEMS
(The Planning Commission is not permitted to take action on issues raised under this item.)
8. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
9. PRESENTATIONS AND EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOP SESSIONS
● None
10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS
● None
Planning Commission Agenda
January 4, 2022 Page 3 of 4
11. CONTINUED ITEMS
11.1 3001 Jacquier Road – Site Plan Review 21-03, Variance 21-01 & Variance 21-02: This
item was continued from the December 21, 2021 Meeting by the Commission upon
request by the project applicant.
Consideration of a Site Plan Review and Variance requests by Apple Hill Hospitality
LLC, Applicant, and Brett Miller – Eat.Drink.Sleep, Developer:
• 106 room hotel including: meeting facilities, guest dining, parking, landscaping and
miscellaneous roadway improvements;
• a variance request to allow an average building height of 46 feet 7 inches in lieu of
40 feet in a Highway Commercial Zone; and
• a parking variance to allow a total of 44% compact parking stalls in lieu of 20%.
The subject site is 3.01 acres generally located north of the intersection of Highway 50
and Point View Drive between Cardinal Drive and Smith Flat Road. Assessor’s Parcel
Nos. 048-290-042 (hotel) and -044 (parking); and 2821 Jacquier Road, Assessor’s
Parcel No. 048-210-038, a 13.71 acre site to contain a 6.6 acre storm water detention
basin.
Environmental Document: Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH# 2003082130) previously
adopted for the previously approved hotel projects (Holiday Inn Express and the Hampton
Inn and Suites) on the subject sites and shall remain applicable for this request.
12. NEW BUSINESS
● None
13. MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF
14. ADJOURNMENT
Planning Commission Agenda
January 4, 2022 Page 4 of 4
Get email alerts for Placerville
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.