Historic Preservation Commission

PLANNING SERVICES NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY SERVICES 911 NORTH 7 TH AVENUE I P.O Box 4169 POCATELLO, IDAH0 83205-4169 208.234.6184 WEB https://www.pocatello.gov HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) AGENDA Wednesday, September 6, 2023, 6:00 p.m. 911 N. Seventh Avenue, City Council Chambers The Historic Preservation Commission is a citizen advisory group to the City Council. They are charged with making decisions concerning the exteriors of the buildings in the Downtown Historic District, make recommendations to the City Council for designation of historic properties and historic preservation and promote historic preservation in the city. The Commission also plays a vital role in the City’s downtown revitalization efforts. All meetings of the HPC are recorded for record retention and transcription. The following is the official agenda of the Historic Preservation Commission. Discussion and Commission action will be limited to those items on the agenda. AGENDA ITEM 1: ROLL CALL AND DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND EX-PARTE CONTACT Disclose who was talked to, the basic substance of the conversation, and whether the conversation had any influence. Disclose if there is anything personally or professionally that would not allow an impartial or unbiased decision. Disclose if a site visit was done, location(s) of the visit, and what was seen. ACTION ITEM - AGENDA ITEM 2: APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Commission may wish waive the oral reading of the special meeting minutes held August 2 and August 16 of 2023, and to approve the minutes as written. ACTION ITEM - AGENDA ITEM 3: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS – FILE 23-4 Bryan Murray, on behalf of the Sons of the Utah Pioneers, has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a historical plaque commemorating the location of the 1st Ward Chapel that existed between 1909-1963 at the north corner of W. Center Street & N. Garfield Avenue. ACTION ITEM - AGENDA ITEM 4: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS – FILE 23-5 Rory Erchul has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the bulkhead and recessed entrance materials of the building located at 230 W. Bonneville Street, known as the Yellowstone Hotel. ACTION ITEM - AGENDA ITEM 4: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EVENTS The Commission may wish to plan and discuss future opportunities to engage the public on various historical or historic preservation topics. ACTION ITEM - AGENDA ITEM 5: PRESERVATION PROJECTS & ASSIGNMENTS The Commission may wish to discuss preservation projects and updates on assignments. x Downtown Historic District Design Standards – Kirk Huffaker x Federal Building Research x Brady Chapel x Gem State Grant – Idaho Humanities Council x Triangle: Lasting Legacy Festival x Walking Tour Brochures x Additional Projects City Hall is accessible to persons with disabilities. Program access accommodations may be provided with two (2) days’ advance notice by contacting Skyler Beebe at sbeebe@pocatello.gov; 208.234.6248 or 5815 South 5th Avenue, Pocatello, ID.  HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA 2 Minutes for August 2, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers, Municipal Building 911 N. 7th Avenue, Pocatello, ID The meeting began at 6:13 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #1: ROLL CALL AND DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND EX- PARTE CONTACT Disclose who was talked to, the basic substance of the conversation, and whether the conversation had any influence. Disclose if there is anything personally or professionally that would not allow an impartial or unbiased decision. Disclose if a site visit was done, location(s) of the visit, and what was seen. PRESENT: Tabatha Butler, Ruta Casabianca, Ellen Ryan, Marty Vizcarra and Jim Young. EXCUSED: Denis Clijsters. UNEXCUSED: Josh Pohlman. STAFF: Jim Anglesey and Aceline McCulla. None of the members had anything to disclose. Jim Young stated he rescinded his resignation given during the June 26 meeting, and he formally apologized to the Commission for his demeanor during the meeting. The Commission appreciated that he will continue on the HPC. AGENDA ITEM #2: APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Commission may wish to waive the oral reading of the HPC special meeting minutes held June 26 and July 17 of 2023, and approve the minutes as written. It was moved by T. Butler and seconded by J. Young to approve the HPC special meeting minutes as written from June 26 and July 17, 2023. Those in favor: Butler, Casabianca, Ryan, Vizcarra and Young. Unanimous. Motion carried. AGENDA ITEM #3: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FILE 23-3 Craig Yadon of Yadon Properties LLC has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install four (4) windows and two (2) doors on the north side of the building located at 234 N. Main Street. The proposed project would allow access to Leadership Park. Craig Yadon of Yadon Properties LLC answered questions by the Commission on the windows and doors. It was moved by J. Young and seconded by T. Butler to approve the request from Craig Yadon as presented, finding the application meets the criteria for review as well as all local and national standards, with the conditions listed in the staff report, and to authorize the Chair to sign the Certificate of Appropriateness. Those in favor: Butler, Casabianca, Ryan, Vizcarra and Young. Unanimous. Motion carried. AGENDA ITEM 4: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EVENTS The Commission may wish to plan and discuss future opportunities to engage the public on various historical or historic preservation topics. The Commission asked to begin the ISU Collections Tour at 4:00 p.m. on August 16. Meet at 3:50 p.m. in the foyer. HPC Meeting 8.2.2023 Page 1 of 2 Walking tour of Downtown Historic District from Union Pacific Depot to 304 N. Main St, and come back down Arthur Ave back to the Depot. AGENDA ITEM 5: PRESERVATION PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS The Commission may wish to discuss preservation projects and updates on assignments. x Downtown Historic District Design Standards (DHDDS) Anglesey stated he would provide the survey results to the Commission, and that the first draft DHDDS will be available to review in the November meeting. Code and fee changes will be updated and available for review in the September meeting. x Federal Building Research Butler noted her research regarding the two-phase building process. Frank Paradice created democracy symbolisms in the Federal Building. Anglesey has a copy of blueprints of the original building. Anglesey also has pictures of the building and interiors. x Historic Preservation Plan Anglesey noted they received a grant for the project. Anglesey will send the Commission a copy of the current plan. We are looking at rewriting the National Registry, the last one was written in 1985 and a handful of the buildings in register are no long there, and some of the buildings need to be reassessed for what buildings are contributing and noncontributing. Vizcarra asked if he can do the research on a building and work with SHPO. Anglesey stated he may work with SHPO directly. With no further discussion, Vizcarra closed the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by: ___________________________________ Approved on: _________________________ Aceline McCulla, Secretary HPC Meeting 8.2.2023 Page 2 of 2  HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA 2 Special Meeting Minutes for August 16, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. Idaho State University (ISU) Eli M. Oboler Library, lower level, room 39B 850 South 9th Avenue, Pocatello, Idaho The meeting began at 4:05 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #1: ROLL CALL PRESENT: Tabatha Butler, Ruta Casabianca, Denis Clijsters, Ellen Ryan, Marty Vizcarra and Jim Young. UNEXCUSED: Josh Pohlman. STAFF: Jim Anglesey and Aceline McCulla. AGENDA ITEM #2: TOUR OF THE ISU SPECIAL COLLECTIONS. The Commission will convene in a tour of the ISU Special Collections. ISU Archivist and Head of Special Collections and Archives Ellen Ryan took the HPC on a tour of the ISU Special Collections. With the end of the tour, Vizcarra closed the meeting at 5:05 p.m. Submitted by: Approved on: Aceline McCulla, Secretary HPC Meeting ϴ.ϭϲ.2023 Page 1 of 1  PLANNING SERVICES NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY SERVICES 911 NORTH 7 TH AVENUE I P.O Box 4169 POCATELLO, IDAH0 83205-4169 208.234.6184 WEB https://www.pocatello.gov AGENDA ITEM NO. ____3_____ POCATELLO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT – SEPTEMBER 6, 2023 APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Bryan Murray – Sons of Utah Pioneers LOCATION: North corner of W. Center Street & N. Garfield Avenue CITY STAFF ASSIGNED: Jim Anglesey, Long-Range Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION & CONDITIONS: Staff concludes that the application for a certificate of appropriateness is compliant with Pocatello Municipal Code Section 17.04.210 with the following conditions: 1. The historic plaque shall not overhang a public sidewalk, nor be located in the public right-of-way. OPTIONAL MOTIONS: 1. Approval of the Application: “Move to approve the request from Sons of Utah Pioneers as presented, finding the application meets the criteria for review as well as all local and national standards, with the conditions listed in the staff report [insert any additional conditions of approval] and authorize the Chair to sign the Certificate of Appropriateness.” 2. Denial of the Application: “Move to deny the request from Sons of Utah Pioneers, finding the application does not meet the criteria for review, finding that: [cite findings for denial].” REQUEST: Bryan Murray, on behalf of the Sons of the Utah Pioneers, has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a historical plaque commemorating the location of the 1st Ward Chapel that existed between 1909-1963 at the north corner of W. Center Street & N. Garfield Avenue. BACKGROUND: According to the Bannock County Historical Society as written in the book Images of America: Pocatello by Walter P. Mallette and Lance J. Holladay, “One of the first permanent church structures in Pocatello was the First Ward building of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints… This church, located at the corner of Garfield and Center Streets was built in the late 1880s. It featured a large painting by Minerva Teichert that depicted a pioneer scene…. The building was eventually torn down in 1962, and a parking lot for a nearby bank is now in its place. The painting was salvaged and is now located in [the Pocatello Idaho Temple.]” COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040: Staff finds the following goals and strategies identified in Pocatello Comprehensive Plan 2040 to be applicable to this application: Authentic & Affordable Neighborhoods, Goal 2, Strategy C: Embrace existing neighborhood assets such as parks, trails, historic identity, etc. and support each neighborhood to strengthen these assets. Goal 6: Preserve the authenticity of Pocatello’s neighborhoods and celebrate our history, architecture, and culture. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR POCATELLO’S DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT: Staff finds the following standards identified in the design guidelines for the downtown historic district to be applicable to this application: 1. Exterior alterations and changes should be kept to a minimum. 2. The building should conform to surrounding buildings and other street features. 3. Every effort should be made to maintain and preserve the building’s original materials and colors. 4. Original and distinctive architectural details should be retained or restored. 5. Signs should be architecturally compatible with the design of the original or proposed building. THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES: Staff finds the following standards identified in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to be applicable to this application: “Rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values.” Standards for Rehabilitation: 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize the restoration period will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be distributed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application & Supporting Materials Certificate of Appropriateness – First Ward Building Plaque City of Pocatello Planning & Development Services Page 2 of 3  REVIEW CRITERIA (17.04.210.I) Compliant City Code and Staff Review Yes No N/A Code Section Analysis 17.04.210.I.1 Adverse impacts to the historical integrity of the property or structure shall be minimized. Staff Review The proposed work includes erecting a commemorative plaque honoring the historic ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ տ location of the 1st Ward Chapel for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The plaque will be a bronzed aluminum, mounted on a metal post with a height of 3 feet. 17.04.210.I.1.a Changes to the defining characteristics of the building or site shall be minimized. ‫܈‬ տ տ Staff Review The building the plaque commemorates was demolished in 1962 and replaced with a parking lot. 17.04.210.I.1.b Removal of historic materials and features of the building or site shall be avoided. ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ ‫܆‬ Staff Review The erection of this plaque will not affect the existing use of the property, which is a parking lot. 17.04.210.I.1.c Historic materials shall be retained where possible. Where not feasible, compatible materials shall be encouraged. ‫܈‬ տ ‫܆‬ The material of the plaque will be constructed of bronzed aluminum and will feature Staff Review gold inscription with a black background. The metal post will have a height of 3 feet. 17.04.210.I.2 The proposed work shall be compatible with the property or structure itself, as well as the surrounding neighborhood or district. Consideration shall be given to exterior design, site layout, proportion, detail, scale, color, texture, and materials. ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ ‫܆‬ Staff Review The plaque will honor a historic building that was demolished in 1962 and replaced with a parking lot. The design of the plaque will be compatible to other historic plaques in the district such as the plaque across the intersection that identifies the historic Old Town neighborhood. 17.04.210.I.3 Landscaping shall be compatible with the historic character of the property itself, as well as with the surrounding neighborhood or district. ‫܈‬ տ ‫܆‬ Landscaping is not included in this project. But the plaque is proposed to be installed Staff Review in a landscape area between the sidewalk and the parking lot. 17.04.210.I.4 The style, materials, size and location of signs shall be compatible with the historic character and scale of the property or structure as well as the surrounding ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ ‫܆‬ neighborhood or district. Staff Review The plaque does not meet the definition of a sign but instead is considered a memorial which is not subject to a sign permit. 17.04.210.I.5 The Historic Preservation Commission must consider the property’s suitability for preservation or restoration; educational value; cost for preservation or restoration; cost of acquisition, restoration, maintenance, operation, or repairs; possibilities for adaptive or alternative use of the property; appraised value and administrative and ‫܈‬ տ տ financial responsibility of any person or organization willing to underwrite all or a portion of such costs. Staff Review The plaque commemorates a historic building which honors a portion of history of the Downtown Historic District. This adds educational value in supporting the historic preservation efforts in the community. Certificate of Appropriateness – First Ward Building Plaque City of Pocatello Planning & Development Services Page 3 of 3 
                     !      ! 
" ##$ %  &'(
" ##$ %  &'( )(&*+,- )(&*+,- -" .  ##" /0 #" -" .  ##" /0 #" 6 #       # %7 1 #0  0 # #  1 # " " .       #"     2   #0 % 3     " # " " #0    "     4 ,    
" ##   " . 3 #    #0 "#0  "$  $ " #  "$  0 5  . 10 0 # 0 3  " #    #0   3 0   
" ## %  1 # 


  1st Ward Building Pocatello Garfield and Center Street 1903 Construction Began 1909 Dedication Cost $17,000 Architect William Allen, of Kaysville, Utah Lbs^   -)q1) 1962 Razed Portneuf Pioneers Pocatello Chapter of the Sons of Utah Pioneers August 2023 Lbm^+10  PLANNING SERVICES NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY SERVICES 911 NORTH 7 TH AVENUE I P.O Box 4169 POCATELLO, IDAH0 83205-4169 208.234.6184 https://www.pocatello.gov AGENDA ITEM NO. ____4_____ POCATELLO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT – SEPTEMBER 6, 2023 APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Rory Erchul LOCATION: 230 W. Bonneville Street – Hotel Yellowstone CITY STAFF ASSIGNED: Jim Anglesey, Long-Range Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION & CONDITIONS: Staff concludes that the application for a certificate of appropriateness is compliant with Pocatello Municipal Code Section 17.04.210 with the following conditions: 1. Stucco shall feature a smooth texture finish and shall either match the color of the building’s terracotta or shall be a “concrete” grey. OPTIONAL MOTIONS: 1. Approval of the Application: “Move to approve the request from Rory Erchul as presented, finding the application meets the criteria for review as well as all local and national standards, with the conditions listed in the staff report [insert any additional conditions of approval] and authorize the Chair to sign the Certificate of Appropriateness.” 2. Denial of the Application: “Move to deny the request from Rory Erchul, finding the application does not meet the criteria for review, finding that: [cite findings for denial].” REQUEST: Rory Erchul has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the bulkhead and recessed entrance materials of the building located at 230 W. Bonneville Street, known as the Yellowstone Hotel. BACKGROUND: The Standrod-Daniels building, known as the Yellowstone Hotel, was built in 1916 and is contributing to the historic district. The National Register states, “The four-story maroon brick Standrod-Daniels Building was designed by A. McF. McSweeney. The structure is lavishly embellished with buff-colored terra cotta trim in the Renaissance Revival style: a denticulated cornice, anthemia, lions' heads, and fascia over the first-floor entrances and fourth-floor double-hung sash windows. Parts of the first floor have been altered. The Stockgrowers Bank & Trust was located in the building in 1917. The building also housed the Yellowstone Hotel, originally managed by Mrs. J. M. Embree, who formerly was manager of the Hotel Nicollet. The hotel was heavily dependent upon the Oregon Short Line for its clientele and was known as one of Pocatello's better hotels. A sample room was provided on the first floor for traveling salesmen.” COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040: Staff finds the following goals and strategies identified in Pocatello Comprehensive Plan 2040 to be applicable to this application: Economically Robust, Goal 3: Promote Downtown as the economic engine for the city. Strategy D: Develop and maintain public/private partnerships to help support Downtown development efforts. Authentic & Affordable Neighborhoods, Goal 2, Strategy C: Embrace existing neighborhood assets such as parks, trails, historic identity, etc. and support each neighborhood to strengthen these assets. Goal 6: Preserve the authenticity of Pocatello’s neighborhoods and celebrate our history, architecture, and culture. Creative Community, Goal 1, Strategy A: Invest in beautification efforts and improve the aesthetic quality of the City’s right-of-ways and spaces visible from those right-of-ways. Goal 4, Strategy A: Implement the Downtown Development Plan to continue to activate the area by investing in the projects therein, and supporting locally driven efforts to strengthen our City’s core. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR POCATELLO’S DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT: Staff finds the following standards identified in the design guidelines for the downtown historic district to be applicable to this application: 1. Exterior alterations and changes should be kept to a minimum. 2. The building should conform to surrounding buildings and other street features. 3. Every effort should be made to maintain and preserve the building’s original materials and colors. 4. Original and distinctive architectural details should be retained or restored. 5. Signs should be architecturally compatible with the design of the original or proposed building. THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES: Staff finds the following standards identified in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to be applicable to this application: “Rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values.” Standards for Rehabilitation: 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize the restoration period will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be distributed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. ATTACHMENTS: A. Application & Supporting Materials Certificate of Appropriateness – 230 W. Bonneville St. City of Pocatello Planning & Development Services Page 2 of 4  REVIEW CRITERIA (17.04.210.I) Compliant City Code and Staff Review Yes No N/A Code Section Analysis 17.04.210.I.1 Adverse impacts to the historical integrity of the property or structure shall be minimized. Staff Review The proposed work includes altering the existing material of the building’s bulkhead and recessed entries. Existing material predominantly include metal faced plywood panels that are considered as intrusive materials. Staff researched original materials on the bulkhead. Where some original material exists under the plywood paneling, it looks as if the bulkhead was composed of the same buff-colored terracotta trim that is featured throughout the rest of the building façade. This is an assumption based on old images of the building. The images show a material that is uniform throughout the entirety of the bulkhead. It is assumed that this material would have been the terracotta as mentioned above. Upon consultation with the architectural ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ տ historians at the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office, as well as expert masons that specialize in the restoration of historic masonry, the following replacement materials for the bulkhead and recessed entries are ordered by level of appropriateness with number one being strongly encouraged: 1. Match the existing terracotta 2. Standard glazed tiles in a solid neutral or black color 3. Concrete or stucco veneer Replacing the existing intrusive materials with materials specified above will improve the historical integrity of this historically significant building. As staff understands, the applicant is electing for a stucco veneer. If approved, the stucco should be a smooth finish and color should match the buff-colored terracotta or a concrete grey. 17.04.210.I.1.a Changes to the defining characteristics of the building or site shall be minimized. Staff Review The existing bulkhead and recessed entry material is predominantly composed of metal faced plywood panels that are considered intrusive to the historic character of ‫܈‬ տ տ the building. The removal of existing bulkhead material and replacing it with material identified previously will improve, or in the case of the terracotta material, restore some of the defining characteristics of the building. 17.04.210.I.1.b Removal of historic materials and features of the building or site shall be avoided. Staff Review Existing historic material found under the plywood panels have been significantly damaged, specifically the terracotta material. It is recommended to match the ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ ‫܆‬ original terracotta material and replace the existing intrusive materials with the terracotta. The other materials identified previously may also work but are not as appropriate as matching the existing terracotta material. 17.04.210.I.1.c Historic materials shall be retained where possible. Where not feasible, compatible materials shall be encouraged. Staff Review Historic materials include the featured terracotta that is present throughout the ‫܈‬ տ ‫܆‬ design of the building’s façade. This terracotta material is recommended to replace the existing intrusive materials identified above. The other two material choices may also be appropriate options but are not preferred. 17.04.210.I.2 The proposed work shall be compatible with the property or structure itself, as well as the surrounding neighborhood or district. Consideration shall be given to exterior design, site layout, proportion, detail, scale, color, texture, and materials. Staff Review Matching the existing terracotta and featuring it throughout the entirety of the ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ ‫܆‬ bulkhead and recessed entries would be compatible with the structure and compliment its historically significant architectural details and design. A standard glazed tile or concrete or stucco veneer may also be appropriate options but are not the preferred material for this project. Certificate of Appropriateness – 230 W. Bonneville St. City of Pocatello Planning & Development Services Page 3 of 4  17.04.210.I.3 Landscaping shall be compatible with the historic character of the property itself, ‫܈‬ տ ‫܆‬ as well as with the surrounding neighborhood or district. Staff Review Landscaping is not included in this project. 17.04.210.I.4 The style, materials, size and location of signs shall be compatible with the historic character and scale of the property or structure as well as the surrounding ‫܈‬ ‫܆‬ ‫܆‬ neighborhood or district. Staff Review Signage is not included in this project. 17.04.210.I.5 The Historic Preservation Commission must consider the property’s suitability for preservation or restoration; educational value; cost for preservation or restoration; cost of acquisition, restoration, maintenance, operation, or repairs; possibilities for adaptive or alternative use of the property; appraised value and administrative and financial responsibility of any person or organization willing to underwrite all or a portion of such costs. Staff Review The subject property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places as contributing to the Downtown Historic District and is of local historical significance. ‫܈‬ տ տ The following are estimated costs of each material option as presented above: x Terracotta: approx. $10-20k (material cost) x Tile: $16.75k (material + labor) x Stucco: $12.5k (material + labor) See estimates in attachment A. It is understood by staff that the applicant has elected for a stucco material. Certificate of Appropriateness – 230 W. Bonneville St. City of Pocatello Planning & Development Services Page 4 of 4   +" 
       !" #"  12$    " $!%"&' ( )%  *! *)*)*) + ,% -  *.*/*0& &&**%/ *))"#