Planning Commission
Regular MeetingRichmond, MI · December 9, 2021
Minutes
APPROVED 01/13/2022
REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2021
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE RICHMOND PLANNING COMMISSION WAS
CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M., ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2021, BY
CHAIRMAN McCLELLAN.
ROLL CALL
Present: Frank, Majchrzak, McClellan, Misko (arv’d 7.01 pm), Moore, Rix, Weinert, Zink
Absent: Kaminski
Others: City Planner Jeschke, City Clerk Stagl
Visitors: DPS Director Goetzinger, Larry Stone, Brandon Stone, Michael LaDuke,
Allen Andre, George Sheridan, Brenda Davisson, Mike Sullivan, George
Moomaw, Catherine Wullaert, Darek Nytko, Mike Garlick, Terry Garlick
Motion by Moore seconded by Frank, to excuse Commissioner Kaminski
From tonight’s meeting for medical reasons.
All yeas Motion passes
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Rix, seconded by Weinert, to approve the minutes of the November 11,
2021, regular meeting as amended:
Under Roll Call: List Commissioner Zink as absent.
In the motion excusing Commissioners from the meeting, include Commissioner Zink.
All yeas Motion passes
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
None
PCM: 12/09/21 Page 1 of 7
APPROVED 01/13/2022
CORRESPONDENCE
Quarterly Roundtable Meeting Minutes of October 18, 2021
City Council Meeting Minutes of October 18, 2021
City Council Meeting Minutes of November 1, 2021
Organizational Meeting Minutes of November 8, 2021
Motion by Frank, seconded by Weinert, to receive and file correspondence as
presented.
All yeas Motion passes
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Motion by Rix, seconded by Moore, to adopt the agenda as presented.
All yeas Motion passes
PUBLIC HEARING
A-1. PCD-02-2021/Ali Hakim on behalf of Stone Property Group/Request for
Preferred Class Designation/67926 Howard Street
Motion by Rix, seconded by Zink, to open the public hearing at 7:02 pm.
All yeas Motion passes
City Planner Jeschke informed the Commission that the applicant, Stone Property
Group, was requesting a Preferred Class Designation of a non-conforming use for a
proposed 10-unit efficiency apartment development within an existing building located at
67926 Howard Street.
Chainman McClellan confirmed that all Commissioners had received all of the additional
correspondence in regards the proposal.
Brandon Stone of Brandon Property Group presented to the Commission their proposal
for the property. Their 10 unit efficiency apartment development would have a positive
impact on the City. The current property has been vacant for over 10 years. It is not
feasible to turn the property into an assisted living facility. It is not practical for a single
family. Commercial space would not work, as it does not fit into the City’s Master Plan.
The only feasible use is for multi-family.
They will be making a substantial investment in the property. Their proposal is
supported by the Master Plan, which indicated there is a need for affordable housing.
PCM: 12/09/21 Page 2 of 7
APPROVED 01/13/2022
They would be repurposing the current building. They are not proposing subsidized
housing – they are not in the business of renting to low income residents.
They feel the main issue is the parking. They did do a 9-day parking study – of the 42
public spaces available, at most 23 were used. They would put into their lease
agreement that only one (1) vehicle is allowed per unit
George Moomaw, Business Manager for St. Augustine’s, 68035 Main Street. The main
concern was the parking and the apartment complex residents using St. A’s parking.
Also concerned with the additional traffic and the safety of the students attending the
school. Requested that the Planning Commission give serious consideration to the
parking issue.
Mike Garlick, 67840 Howard – Main concern was with the lack of parking.
George Sheridan, 67763 George – Main concern with the parki9ng. Also did not feel
there was enough room on the property for storage of trash and recyclables.
Questioned if condos were a possibility.
Austin Sullivan, 67854 Howard – Questioned where the garbage would be stored.
Larry Stone, Co-partner of Stone Development, indicated that there was space for
garbage behind the building. He realized that parking is an issue with this building. He
reaffirmed that each unit would only get one (1) vehicle – that would be a condition of
the lease. They would be able to identify their tenant’s vehicles and would let their
tenants know where they could legally park. He did not believe they will have a big
parking issue. The proposed unit are 400-500 square feet and would only allow for 1 or
2 people per unit – this would cater to a younger demographic. They would have a
designated loading zone for residents to use when they have packages/groceries.
Written comments were received from the following:
Emily Lenn, St. Augustine School Principal – Opposed to the development.
St. Augustine School Advisory Committee – Opposed to the development
George Moomaw, St. Augustine School – Opposed to the development
Jason and Alexandra Anderson, 71020 Weeks Road
Motion by Rix, seconded by Frank, to close the public hearing at 7:33 pm.
All yeas Motion passes
PCM: 12/09/21 Page 3 of 7
APPROVED 01/13/2022
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
B-1. PCD-02-2021/Ali Hakim on behalf of Stone Property Group/Request for
Preferred Class Designation/67926 Howard Street
The property most recently had been used as a dependent elderly housing congregate
care facility, which closed in 2015. This is a challenging property in that the building
occupies almost the entire parcel area.
City Planner Jeschke informed the Commission that the applicant is proposing to
renovate the building into six one-bedroom apartments and four efficiency apartments.
They will continue to own and manage the property after the renovations have taken
place. The apartments will all have one bath and interior access to each unit. Each unit
will vary from 410 square feet to 554 square feet in area. The anticipated rents will be
around $700-800 per month. The outer exterior of the building will not change much.
There is an on-street public parking row across Howard Street from the facility, which
they would like to be allowed to utilize during operation. There will be no designated
spaces assigned. Out of the 42 on-street parking spaces, 26 are on Howard Street and
16 additional parking spaces are on Franklin Street.
The use of this property as apartment would actually require less parking that the
previously approved Convalescent Care Residence from a zoning ordinance standpoint.
The existing building is quite large and based on the context of the surrounding single
family residences. It is out of place and will most likely have difficulty being occupied in
the future and could sit vacant for quite some time.
Other than the lack of on-site parking, the proposed use of the property as apartments
is probably the most realistic reuse option for this property.
Motion by Zink, seconded by Weinert, to approve the requested Preferred Class
Designation for a nonconforming use and a Site Plan Review from Stone Property
Group to allow a 10-unit apartment development on property located at 67926 Howard
Street (APN: 50-07-06-01-308-016), subject to the following conditions:
1. If the building is vacant for more than one (1) year after this approval the
preferred class designation of this property shall be null and void.
2. The applicant shall create one barrier-free (handicap assessable) parking space
on the property.
3. The applicant shall work with the planning and building department regarding all
required building and related building/trade permits, sign permits, and occupancy
permits through the City of Richmond Building Department.
PCM: 12/09/21 Page 4 of 7
APPROVED 01/13/2022
Discussion on Motion:
Rix – Questioned how many of the parking spaces were City owned. City Planner
Jeschke informed the Commission that it was 42 City owned parking spaces.
Moore – Stated that the Preferred Class Designation runs with the property owner. If
another person wanted to purchase the property, but still operate in the same manner,
the new owner would need to reapply to the Planning Commission for a Preferred Class
Use Permit. He did question if the 10 units being proposed was the right amount.
Misko – Expressed concern with the number of units being proposed. He was in favor
of having the lease agreement only allow for one vehicle per unit.
Rix – Was not in favor of the 10 units being proposed. He did not feel it was fair to allow
the residents to use the available parking spaces. He was not against apartments, but
was not in favor of this proposal and he would not be voting for it.
Weinert – Was encouraged by the proposal. The 42 parking spaces are for public use.
He would prefer less units.
Frank – He was in agreement with Rix and would not vote in favor of proposal.
Zink – This property was a challenge to develop. He would like to see the lease
indicate that only one vehicle per unit is allowed. Most all Commissioners were in
agreement that they would prefer to see less units.
Motion by Rix, seconded by Misko, to postpone action on this item until the next
Planning Commission Meeting schedule for January 13, 2022.
All yeas Motion passes
B-2. PIR-01-2021/City of Richmond/Public Improvement Review/Reconstruction
of Burke Drive
City Planner Jeschke informed the Commission that the City was proposing to
reconstruct Burke Drive from Division Road to the north terminus (the entire length of
Burke Drive).
DPS Director Goetzinger informed the Commission that the work includes replacement
of the entire pavement section including aggregate base, hot mix asphalt pavement and
curb & Gutter.
Motion by Zink, seconded by Frank, to approve the Public Improvement Review (PIR-
01-2021) of the proposed reconstruction of Burke Drive from Division Road to the north
PCM: 12/09/21 Page 5 of 7
APPROVED 01/13/2022
terminus (the entire length of Burke Drive).
All yeas Motion passes
B-3. PIR-02-2021/City of Richmond/Public Improvement Review/Reconstruction
of Seymour Street
City Planner Jeschke informed the Commission that the City was proposing to
reconstruct Seymour Street from Dow Street to Mert Street (the entire length of
Seymour Street.
DPS Director Goetzinger informed the Commission that the work includes pulverizing
the existing hot mix asphalt surface, grading the pulverized material and placing a new
standard duty HMA pavement section. The project will include re-grading the ditch lines
and installing new culverts at all driveways.
Motion by Frank, seconded by Majchrzak, to approve the Public Improvement Review
(PIR-02-2021) of the proposed reconstruction of Seymour Street from Dow Street to
Mert Street (the entire length of Seymour Street).
All yeas Motion passes
MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM THE CITY STAFF
City Manager Moore – Wished everyone a Merry Christmas.
CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioners wished everyone Happy Holidays!
PCM: 12/09/21 Page 6 of 7
APPROVED 01/13/2022
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Rix, supported by Frank, to adjourn the Planning Commission Regular
Meeting at 8:10 p.m.
All yeas Motion passes
Respectfully submitted:
Karen Stagl
City Clerk
PCM: 12/09/21 Page 7 of 7
Agenda
REGULAR MEETING
RICHMOND PLANNING COMMISSION
36725 DIVISION ROAD
RICHMOND, MI 48062
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2021
7:00 PM
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
- Regular Meeting of November 11, 2021
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION (non-agenda items)
CORRESPONDENCE
- Quarterly Roundtable Meeting Minutes of October 18, 2021
- City Council Meeting Minutes of October 18, 2021
- City Council Meeting Minutes of November 1, 2021
- Organizational Meeting Minutes of November 8, 2021
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
A. PUBLIC HEARING
A-1. PCD-02-2021 – ALI HAKIM on behalf of STONE PROPERTY GROUP - Request
for a Preferred Class Designation of a non-conforming Use for a proposed 10-Unit
efficiency apartment development within an existing building located at 67926 Howard
Street (APN: 50-07-06-01-308-016).
B. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
B-1. PCD-02-2021 – ALI HAKIM on behalf of STONE PROPERTY GROUP - Request
for a Preferred Class Designation of a non-conforming Use for a proposed 10-Unit
efficiency apartment development within an existing building located at 67926 Howard
Street (APN: 50-07-06-01-308-016).
B-2. PIR-01-2021 – CITY OF RICHMOND – Request for a Public Improvement Review
regarding the reconstruction of Burke Drive.
B-3. PIR-02-2021 – CITY OF RICHMOND – Request for a Public Improvement Review
regarding the reconstruction of Seymour Drive.
MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM THE CITY STAFF
COMMENTS FROM CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSION MEMBERS
ADJOURNMENT
Those members of the Planning Commission wishing to speak shall first be recognized by the Chair to speak, and each
person who speaks shall address the chair. Other persons in attendance at the meeting shall not speak unless
recognized by the Chair (Roberts’ Rules). Prior to the discussion by the Planning Commission each item to be
considered, the Chair shall first ask for a motion from the Planning Commission on the item to be discussed. Once a
motion is made and seconded, the Planning Commission may discuss the matter at hand. Once the Planning
Commission has finished its discussion on the matter, the Chair shall open discussion on the matter to the public. The
Chair, at their sole discretion may establish a time limit for individual public comments on any business item if the
Chair determines that time limits are necessary to provide for the orderly conduct of the meeting (PA267 of 1976, as
amended). When the Chair determines that there are no other public comments on the business item, discussion on
the item will be closed to the public and only the Planning Commission shall then engage in any final discussion on
the matter and act on the business item without interruption from the public.
- 1 -
Get email alerts for Richmond
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.