City Council

River Heights City COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, April 19, 2022 Notice is hereby given that the River Heights City Council will hold its regular council meeting beginning at 6:30 p.m., anchored from the River Heights City Office Building at 520 S 500 E. Pledge of Allegiance and Opening Thought(Gallup) Adoption of Previous Minutes and Agenda Reports and Approval of Payments(Mayor, Council, Staff) Public Comment Annual Update and New Contracts for Animal Control and Law Enforcement Services- Sheriff Jensen Review of Ranked Choice Voting - County Clerk Jess Bradfield and Kelleen Potter Utah Election Integrity (UEl)-Cristy Bulkley Discussion on Rank Choice Voting and Vote for Its Use Moving Forward Discuss and Accept Stewart Hill Park Bid Discuss Old School Use Adjourn To join the Zoom meeting: httPs://us02web.zoom.us/i/81848194456?pwd=d2ILcGZvallrNnlOMlRwUnJ4emlVZz09 Posted this 16'^ day pf April 2022 Sheila Lind, Recdfder In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations(including auxiliary communicative aids and services) during this meeting should notify Sheila Lind,(435)770-2061 at least 24 hours before the meeting. 520 South 500 East River Heights, Utah 84321 Phone & Fax (435) 752-2646  Please print your name on the roll. Luc^S K /f ^qJaaJ i '2-L II ( I fl n £SS (Vtv^(iuA-^ ClErl<JA'Jol:U^s ^ (A /l/q ^v^/A? (y>o^C COi^fA/ O f^)(^i- 'lAAj^Kl'l^ l\ ^doX-O  River Heights City 2 3 Council Meeting 4 April 19, 2022 5 6 7 Present: Mayor Jason Thompson 8 Council members: Shariie Gallup 9 Tyson Glover 10 Janet Mathews 11 Chris Mllbank 12 Blake Wright 13 Recorder Sheila Llnd 14 Public Works Director Clayten Nelson 15 Finance Director Cliff Grover 16 Treasurer Wendy Wiiker 17 18 Others Present: See Roll 19 Eiectronicaiiy Present: Kelleen Potter, Cindy Schaub, Heather Lehnig 20 21 The following motions were made during the meeting: 23 24 Motion #1 25 Councilmember Glover moved to "adopt the minutes of the council meeting of April 5, 2022, and 26 the evening's agenda." Councilmember Mllbank seconded the motion, which passed with Gallup, Glover, 27 Mathews, Mllbank, and Wright in favor. No one opposed. 28 29 Motion #2 30 Councilmember Mllbank moved to "pay the bills as listed." Councilmember Gallup seconded the 31 motion, which passed with Gallup, Glover, Mathews, Mllbank, and Wright In favor. No one opposed. 32 33 Motion #3 34 Councilmember Mllbank moved to "postpone a vote on Ranked Choice Voting." Councilmember 35 Glover seconded the motion, which didn't carry. Glover and Mllbank were in favor and Gallup, Mathews 36 and Wright opposed. 37 38 Motion #4 39 Councilmember Gallup moved to "discontinue Ranked Choice Voting until further notice or until 40 the Council decided to reconsider." Councilmember Mathews seconded the motion, which carried with 41 Gallup, Mathews, and Wright In favor. Mllbank and Glover opposed. 42 43 Motion #5 Councilmember Wright moved to "accept Cache Valley Excavation's base bid and bid alternates for a total of $405,982.50 and that the project moves forward, contingent upon RAPZ funding being Biiirnr yiilutil i fily f 520 South 500 East River Heights, Utah 84321 Phone & Fax (435)752-2646 46 awarded,so with that and the amount that's been budgeted they would be able to do the project." 47 Councilmember Glover seconded the motion, which carried with Gallup, Glover, Mathews, Milbank, and 48 Wright in favor. 49 50 51 Proceedings of the Meeting: 52 53 The River Heights City Council met at 6:30 p.m. in the Ervin R. Crosbie Council Chambers In the 54 River Heights City Building on Tuesday, April 19, 2022,for their regular council meeting. 55 Pledge of Allegiance and Opening Thought: Councilmember Gallup gave a thought. 56 Adoption of Previous Minutes and Agenda: Minutes for the April 5, 2022, meeting were reviewed. 57 Councilmember Glover moved to "adopt the minutes of the council meeting of April 5,2022, 58 and the evening's agenda." Councilmember Milbank seconded the motion, which passed with Gallup, 59 Glover, Mathews, Milbank, and Wright in favor. No one opposed. 60 Reports and Approval of Pavments(Mavor. Council. Staff): 61 Mayor Thompson 62 • He planned to discuss Rod Rounds water connection request at the next meeting. He had talked 63 to Engineer Rasmussen and Attorney Jenkins about Rod Rounds request to connect his property in 64 the county to River Heights water and read from their opinions. In general. Engineer Rasmussen 65 replied that providing services outside of the city can become problematic and cause additional 66 burden on the city. He suggested encouraging Mr. Rounds to annex to River Heights. The County 67 has said they are ok with an island. However,the state code is clear that islands shouldn't be 68 created with annexations. Once Mr. Rounds gets water from the city, there would be no incentive 69 for him to ever annex. The mayor read from the Attorney Jenkins comments, who also was not in 70 favor of providing water services outside of the city and recommended against the action. 71 • He reported it was likely his long-term idea for the Old School wouldn't happen until at least a 72 year. His biggest desire for the building is to offer something that River Heights residents would 73 benefit from. 74 Councilmember Wright didn't have anything to report. 75 Councilmember Gallup 76 • The Easter Egg hunt was a success and the community enjoyed it. 77 Councilmember Glover 78 • He hoped to discuss 400 South sidewalk options at the next meeting. 79 • He has been working with PWD Nelson on sidewalk repair decisions. 80 Councilmember Mathews 81 • She had met with PWD Nelson and Engineer Rasmussen about capital projects for 2023. The 82 lower well improvements estimate has gone up significantly, from $200,000 to $400,000. She 83 noted the importance of getting it done as soon as possible so the city will have a water source 84 back-up in place. 85 Councilmember Milbank 86 • The irrigation water is running. 87 FD Grover 88 • He discussed the financial summary. Cash has increased and everything is tracking on the 89 budgets. Capital Projects are behind in expenditures by about $348,000. Water and sewer are 90 ahead substantially. River Heights City Council Meeting,4/19/22  • He asked council members to schedule time to meet with Treasurer Wilker about their budgets 92 since he has had some things come up. 93 Pubiic Works Director Nelson 94 • He discussed sidewalk repairs. The capital projects budget had $50,000 for sidewalk replacement 95 this year. However, concrete is currently very expensive. They decided to use the money for 96 cutting repairs, which they had bid at $29,000. The cutting company bid what they felt they could 97 accomplish by the end of the fiscal year, which would include most of the city (except for Stewart 98 Hill and Saddlerock). 99 Mayor Thompson 100 • He met with Engineer Rasmussen and PWD Nelson last week and has asked Mr. Rasmussen to 101 create an eight-year infrastructure plan, which will help them with budget preparation. 102 Treasurer Wiiker 103 • She presented and answered questions regarding the list of bills to be paid." 104 • She gave her cell number for the council members to schedule appointments with her to discuss 105 their budgets. 106 Councilmember Mllbank moved to "pay the bills as listed." Councllmember Gallup 107 seconded the motion, which passed with Gallup, Glover, Mathews, Mllbank,and Wright In 108 favor. No one opposed. 109 Public Comment; Cindy Schaub was grateful the podium had been moved so she could see the 110 speaker from Zoom. She went on record as stating she does not care for Ranked Choice Voting. She felt it 111 was confusing and had heard the same opinion from others. Discuss Old School Use: Mayor Thompson said there had been several groups interested in using iij thebuilding. The Boys and Girls Club had reached out and requested use of the full building. Theyhad 114 done a walk-through prior to the meeting. He invited them to come and present their desired use of the 115 building. 116 Jenny Schultz of the Boys and Girls Club explained their program and said they were looking for a 117 larger place to house more families. They saw a lot of possibilities for the building. They provide out of 118 school care to school age kids. She discussed a survey they had done with families in the valley which 119 showed there is a great need. Currently there are many families from Cache Valley who take their 120 children to the Club's location in Tremonton. She handed out information about their program. 121 Councilmember Gallup asked what their typical week looked like in the summer. Ms. Schuiz said 122 they run from 7:45am-6:00pm. They would start with K-5*^ grade ages and might move into teen 123 programs later. They have about 97 different activities for the kids in the summer. Their staff is 1/15 or 124 1/20. They plan on about 120 kids. They might limit the amount as they are getting started. This would 125 be their only location right now. 126 Councilmember Mllbank asked if the kids were bussed. Ms.Schuiz said they have vans that 127 transport from school to their facility. They like to get the kids outside when the weather permits. The 128 teachers are trained staff and occasionally parents. It's a national program of which they are a franchise. 129 They get state and federal money and seek grants. 130 Councilmember Gallup asked about possible damage to the building. Ms. Schuiz said there could 131 be occasions when minor things happen, which is in their budget. They were interested In a one-year 132 contract to see how it goes. They want to show the community the need for what they offer. 133 Councilmember Wright asked if there are other tenants currently using the building. Mayor Thompson said there is a church group who uses it on Sundays and is contracted until May 1. The audiologlst had a couple years left on his contract. River Heights City Council Meeting,4/19/22 136 Ms. Schulz explained they also run their program after school until 6:30pm. They are working with 137 the school district and transit district on transportation. 138 Mayor Thompson explained the city has a few rooms in the building which they have claimed. Ms. 139 Schulz said they have shared buildings in the past and have been able to make it work. She felt the 140 classrooms would work well for what they need. They currently use an old seminary building in 141 Tremonton which the council was welcome to visit. They would like a place in the building to be able to 142 prepare healthy snacks for the kids. 143 Mayor Thompson informed that the building requires the cost of utilities and maintenance. The 144 rent they were offering would be helpful. A partnership could benefit both groups. He said he benefited, 145 from the Boys and Girls Club growing up and was supportive. He suggested looking at a one-year contract 146 and then see if they wanted to address long term. 147 Councilmember Gallup asked if their survey Included other cities besides Logan. Ms. Schuiz felt it 148 included a good mix of cities around the valley. Ms. Gallup asked if all 120 kids would be running to the 149 park all at one time. Ms.Schulz confirmed they send them out by age group. They also transport the kids 150 to other parks,so they don't bombard one area. 151 Mayor Thompson said the city may require a copy of their schedule to prevent conflicts with the 152 city ambassador activities. Councilmember Gallup also wanted the gym to be available for community 153 events and citizens who may want to rent it. Ms.Schulz said they would be willing to work with that. 154 Review of Ranked Choice Voting f RCVl - County Clerk Jess Bradfield and Kelleen Potter: Kelleen 155 Potter presented data from a survey taken before the election results were released. She discussed the 156 accuracy and results of the survey. There were many positive reviews of RCV. 157 Mayor Thompson asked for explanation on how audits work on a RCV election. Ms. Potter said 158 there is a higher-level person who could come to Utah to do the audit. There was also an auditor in Utah 159 County. 160 Mayor Thompson asked her to explain the biggest unforeseen challenges that happened during 161 the election that had her frustrated. Ms. Potter said, it was educating voters and candidates on how RCV 162 worked. Each city had different amounts of funding to spread information. She wished they could have 163 done more. There was a lot of misinformation out to the public. 164 Councilmember Milbank felt political parties would resist RCV for reasons which included not 165 having a primary. Ms. Potter said RCV can be used for a party primary. She felt RCV more fully expressed 166 the will of the voters. She also said if someone withdraws from a race, then a voter's ballot is not wasted 167 because it would allow their 2"^^ or 3^*^ choice to be counted. 168 Councilmember Gallup asked if the survey asked political party affiliation. Ms. Potter said they 169 made sure It was balanced based on the percentage of the party in the area. 170 Jess Bradfield introduced himself as the Cache County Auditor/Clerk who runs elections. He felt it 171 wasn't his place to push RCV or not. He discussed his neutral observations. Some positives for RCV were 172 cost savings and 50% plurality. He said Ms. Potter was great to work with. He didn't see any negative 173 campaigning from RCV candidates. He agreed that voter outreach was an issue. River Heights had the 174 highest number of overvotes and undervotes (as were an Issue in other places). The RCV method took 175 longer to release results. He said true audits were difficult and explained how they worked. He felt the 176 state should have auditors of their own, rather than using a third party. 177 Mayor Thompson asked Mr. Bradfield what his biggest frustration was with RCV that he had to 178 deal with. Mr. Bradfield said the election got more political; the timing wasn't great due to the political 179 climate of the country. Other than that, they could work through the issues. 180 Councilmember Gallup asked about audits and when they were performed. Mr. Bradfield said 181 audits were allowed on close vote elections. River Heights City Council Meeting,4/19/22  Mr. Bradfield said he would email an.analysis of River Heights votes counted and disqualified to 183 Mayor Thompson, who would forward the information to the Council. 184 Mr. Bradfield said it's typical to hear more about the bad than the good. Most of the negative 185 comments came from those who were older/elderly. 186 Utah Election Integrity fUEH - Cristv Bulklev: Christy Bulkley Henshaw and Wendy Hart gave an 187 overview of what they do as part of Utah Election Integrity. They are a non-profit organization with three 188 main goals, which are to oppose HB 36, SB 54 and RCV. They are volunteers from Utah County. She 189 explained a poll they had done, which concluded that most people didn't like RCV. 190 Wendy Hart said RCV isn't fair and discussed 7 reasons why. She said it Is driven by money. 191 Councilmember Milbank asked who the power brokers were and their motivations. Ms. Hart 192 listed who they were. She didn't know their motivations for pushing for RCV and Fair Vote. 193 Councilmember Glover asked the prior councilmembers what their reasons were for supporting 194 RCV in the last election. Councilmember Milbank felt the system was more democratic, more so than the 195 two-party system. It seemed to him that it would give more people an opportunity to run and a better 196 chance at winning. Ms. Hart explained that RCV gives an Illusion that third parties have more of a chance 197 and explained how it actually works/doesn't work. 198 Councilmember Gallup voted for it because she was naive and only had a few minutes to decide. 199 She wanted to be objective and was told they used this method in.New York and Utah County with 200 positive feedback. CouncilmemberWright voted against. 201 Mayor Thompson thanked all those who presented. 202, Annual Update and New Contract for Animal Control and Law Enforcement Services-Sheriff Jensen; Lt. Bartchi and Deputy Wallentine were In attendance in place of Sheriff Jensen. Lt. Bartchi presented and explained the contracts. The County is building an animal control shelter that cities have 205 the option to use for impounding. He explained what they will offer and their collaboration with USU 206 veterinary training. This year they are offering a three-year contract for law enforcement (as requested 207 by other cities) and the usual one-year contract for animal control. 208 Councilmember Milbank asked where they spend their time in River Heights. Lt. Bartchi read from 209 the River Heights report, which represented a variety of calls, none too serious. 210 Mayor Thompson said River Heights has been frustrated with the lack of help on animal control in 211 the parks. He asked Recorder Lind to give her input, which she did. She mentioned that the city does not 212 see any money for citations, which means they are not being given out. The park has a big dog problem 213 which citations would help to remedy. Mr. Bartchi explained they need a signed complaint before a 214 citation can be written. His animal officers are not focused on revenue. Their main goal is behavior 215 change. He agreed they don't Issue many citations. They have two or three staffed animal control 216 officers, which cover the weekday hours. On weekends their deputies can take animal calls. 217 Councilmember Gallup asked if they could come to the park on a weekend because there are 218 more dogs in the parks during that time. 219 Mayor Thompson asked that animal control work directly with Recorder Lind about prime times to 220 catch those In the park. Ms. Lind explained she has talked to them numerous times over numerous years 221 and it doesn't happen. PWD Nelson said there are dogs in the park constantly. The mayor asked Lt. 222 Bartchi If they could work hard on this in the next month. 223 Mayor Thompson said they won't adopt the contracts tonight. He will have the attorney look at 224 them first. He thanked Deputy Wallentine for working with the city. i Lt. Bartchi said he will do his best to get officers in the park, although they are short-staffed right I now. 227 The Council took a short break. River Heights City Council Meeting,4/19/22 228 Mayor Thompson discussed the reasons the city wants to enforce no dogs in the park. He wants 229 to keep holding the animal control officer's feet to the fire until the City gets what they need from them. 230 - Councilmember Gallup asked what other cities pay for animal control. Mayor Thompson will 231 check with Lt. Bartchi. 232 Discussion on Rank Choice Voting and Vote for Its Use Moving Forward: Mayor Thompson had 233 very strong opinions but asked for council opinion first. Councilmember Wright was curious why they 234 were talking about it now when there's not an election coming up. Mayor Thompson affirmed there was 235 nothing pushing it right now, but both sides of RCV wanted to present and since the election was freshly 236 over, he felt it would be a good time to discuss and vote on it. The council could also change their vote 237 before an election. 238 Councilmember Wright had found RCV to be very confusing. He went through the tabulations 239 multiple times and did homework and still didn't fully understand it. The feedback he got was that people 240 didn't like it. He realized some people were fine with it, and just didn't tell him their opinion. 241 Councilmember Gallup felt the RCV system was ambiguous and not straight forward. When voters 242 are unsure of the system their confidence goes down. 243 Councilmember Glover heard from his neighbors who said they preferred it. He noted that it 244 might be best to hear from the older population. 245 Councilmember Mathews reported that a lot of confused people talked to her about how RCV 246 works, even very intelligent people. Her feeling was they wanted to vote the old way. 247 Councilmember Mllbank was aware that change is hard and RCV seemed very confusing. 248 However, he felt it represents more of the will of the people. He felt the current political party system is 249 broken. RCV may be a more democratic approach. He said change needed to start somewhere. The 250 country is in trouble because of politics. If RCV is fairer in the end and becomes more accepted, it may be 251 a good change. The people he heard from liked RCV. 252 Councilmember Glover questioned if the majority of River Heights would favor RCV. 253 Mayor Thompson expressed strong opposition to RCV. He said no price can be placed on 254 freedom, transparency, and integrity of our actions. The principle he heard tonight was about cost 255 savings. RCV is extremely confusing, and the Integrity of the results Is being called into question. There 256 was no way to audit this system effectively. Why would they want to use a system that casts huge 257 shadows of doubt? He viewed RCV as a big issue arid they are starting with municipalities. We said they 258 need to ask the guiding principles on what they are basing their decision. He asked if there was a motion 259 to abandon RCV for now. 260 Councilmember Milbank moved to "postpone a vote on Ranked Choice Voting." 261 Councilmember Glover seconded the motion, which didn't carry. Glover and Milbank were in favor and 262 Gallup, Mathews and Wright opposed. 263 Councilmember Gallup moved to "discontinue Ranked Choice Voting until further notice or until 264 the Council decided to reconsider." Councilmember Mathews seconded the motion, which carried with 265 Gallup, Mathews,and Wright in favor. Milbank and Glover opposed. 266 Councilmember Glover asked for more notice before discussions on hot topics so they could have 267 more time to talk to their constituents. Councilmember Wright suggested they learn how RCV works so 268 they can explain It to others. Mayor Thompson felt the RCV proponents should foot the bill for public 269 education on how it works. 270 Councilmember Mathews felt people who were confused should be educated. Until that 271 happens, she'd like to continue with the old way of voting. Mayor Thompson asked if It was worth It if 272 75% of the people are for and 25% don't understand how it works. He said we are told the system has 273 integrity and Its transparent, but they can't see it, they just must trust that It is. River Heights City Council Meeting,4/19/22 6  .y Discuss and Accept Stewart Hill Park Bid: Councilmember Gallup remembered they were going to "275 discuss and vote on a name for the park. Councilmember Milbank said they are currently calling It 276 Stewart Hill Park for ease. It can be given an'official name later. 277 Councilmember Milbank said he and PWD Nelson went through the two bids with Engineer 278 Rasmussen. He discussed the bid tabulation. 279 Councilmember Gallup asked where the additional decorative fence would be placed. 280 Councilmember Milbank explained It will go along the east side from the road to the cemetery. Ms. 281 - Gallup wondered If the resident might prefer a privacy fence. Mr. Milbank said he talked to her, and she 282 liked It. 283 Councilmember Milbank explained that concrete, parking lots and utilities were included in phase 284 one. He"will be meeting tomorrow with the county to discuss and answer questions on the RAPZ grant 285 application he turned In. He felt the 8" water line portion of the bill to connect the two Stewart Hill Drives 286 should be paid for by the water fund. PWD Nelson responded that this didn't come up on the water 287 priority list that was discussed earlier today with Councilmember Mathews and Engineer Rasmussen. 288 Mayor Thompson said he had tasked Engineer Rasmussen with making a list of where he thought 289 they should keep their minimums in the water and sewer funds to help them in determining their capital 290 improvement lists each budget year. He felt they had gotten off course on keeping up with a solid 291 infrastructure plan to make sure they could cover the most urgent projects. He'd like to see them follow 292 the recommendations of the city engineer, although they don't have to. 293 Councilmember Gallup asked if both parking lots would be built In this phase. If so,she preferred 294 lights also be installed. Councilmember Milbank discussed what was in the bid and said there is also a lot of ambient light in the area. Councilmember Glover asked If they could accept the bid upon conditions of the RAPZ award. 297 Councilmember Milbank said the bids can't be guaranteed because construction prices keep going up. He 298 didn't want the city to be left in a bind. Councilmember Wright sald^they can make the motion 299 contingent. Mr. Milbank didn't know the bid expiration date; PWD Nelson said the sooner the contractor 300 knows, the better so they can get supplies ordered for the project. Mayor Thompson felt going forward 301 with a vote of spending $400,000, without the funding might not be a good Idea. 302 Councilmember Wright ppinted out that if it didn't get funded, they would need to come back to 303 the Council anyway. 304 Councilmember Gallup asked what the award amount would need to be from RAPZ to go forward 305 on the project. Councilmember Milbank mentioned there are parts of the project they can cut if needed. 306 Councilmember Wright said if the math didn't work out, they would need to come back to the council. 307 Councilmember Glover suggested they could revise what was included with Phase 1. 308 Councilmember Wright moved to "accept Cache Valley Excavation's base bid and bid alternates - - 309 - for a total of $405,982.50 and that the project moves forward, contingent upon RAPZ funding being 310 awarded,so with that and the amount that's been budgeted they would be able to do the project." . 311' Councilmember Glover seconded the motion, which carried with Gallup, Glover, Mathews, Milbank, 312 and Wright in favor. 313 Discuss Old School Use: Mayor Thompson's plan was to work with Attorney Jenkins on a contract -314 with the Boys and Girls Club and work with PWD Nelson on making sure the city keeps the space they 315 need. He asked If there were any objections on renting to them. Councilmember Gallup was interested in ^■" 316 - -how many River Heights residents would be using their service. She didn't want to be supporting a ■ program that was only for Logan residents. River Heights City Council Meeting, 4/19/22 318 Councilmember Wright asked what the yearly operating cost were for the building. He was told 319 $24,000. The Boys and Girls Club would bring In $72,000/year. Discussion was held on who would be 320 cleaning the building and purchasing supplies. The mayor said the renters would do this. 321 Mayor Thompson said The Club would be willing to Integrate a library, which he is passionate 322 about. He Is looking at funding for building Improvements. He likes the Club's ability to get funding as 323 well. 324 Councilmember Gallup asked if their program might grow too big for River Heights. The mayor 325 asked everyone to email him their concerns so they can address them In the contract. 326 Councilmember Mllbank felt they had an obligation to take opportunities that would help offset 327 costs. 328 The mayor was Interested In a key card system for access to the building. The system would be 329 able to track who was going in and out as well as limit the hours their card would work. 330 Councilmember Gallup wondered about the noise level Inside the building. Mayor Thompson said 331 the obligation to bring in revenue Is a greater concern than to have quiet offices and storage use for the 332 city. 333 Councilmember Mathews wanted the gym to be available for residents to rent. Discussion was 334 held on parameters that can be addressed In the contract. He will bring the lease draft back to the council 335 to make sure they are okay with It. 336 Councilmember Glover asked who the other applicants were who have Inquired about the 337 building. Mayor Thompson said there were people who wanted to rent the whole building and sublease 338 It. A photographer wanted to rent one room. An artist wanted a couple rooms. There were other 339 options, but they wouldn't allow community use. Some wanted It for free. No others offered the amount 340 the Club Is willing to pay, which Is right In line with what the real estate agent suggested when he walked 341 through It. 342 The meetjj: ^ at 9:50 p.m. 343 344 345 346 / Sheila LInd, Record^ 347 348 Thom River Heights City Council Meeting, 4/19/22  River Heights City Bills To Be Paid April 19, 2022 Payee Description Admin. P&Z Parks/Rec Pub. Safety Com. AfT. Roads Water Sewer Total 1 Alltech Monthly Billing $24.32 $24.32 $24.32 $72.96 2 Bio-West Stewart Hill Park $2,784.98 $2,784.98 3 Blue Stakes Billable E-Mail Notifications $5.64 $5.64 $5.82 $17.10 4 Cache Valley Publishing Ad for Bid Stewart Hill Drive $285.80 $285.80 5 CAL Ranch Work Gloves $19.48 $19.48 $19.49 $19.49 $77.94 6 Caselle Monthly Support $91.69 $91.66 $91.65 $275.00 7 Daines & Jenkins Legal Fees $2,065.50 $2,065.50 8 Forsgren & Associates General. Lower Well, Stewart Hill $1,025.00 $430.00 $3,353.75 $4,808.75 9 Freedom Mailing Bill Processing $164.28 $54.76 $54.74 $273.78 10 Logan City Water Consumption $152.64 $152.64 11 Mark Anderson 1/2 Providence Logan Irrigation Share $100.00 $100.00 12 National Equipment Services, LLC Snow Removal Plow Belt $198.59 $198.59 13 Robertson Utility Products, LLC Sewer Repair & Maint. $390.00 $390.00 14 Rocky Mountain Power Electricity $272.40 $55.43 $24.77 $1,180.78 $3,013.84 $22.71 $4,569.93 15 Spencer Rasmussen Flyer Delivery $150.00 $150.00 16 Thomas Petroleum Fuel For City Vehicles $93.33 $93.33 $93.33 $93.31 $373.30 17 Utah Local Government Trust Workers Comp Montly Billing $12.65 $19.45 $59.37 $75.20 $79.16 $245.83 18 Xerox Monthly copier usage $40.41 $40.41 19 20 21 22 VISA Paid on 04/19/2022 Total of $935.81 23 Lynn's Audio & Video Sewer Camera Repair $50.00 $50.00 24 Amazon Office Folders $53.86 $53.86 25 Maverik Fuel Fuel For City Vehicles $45.75 $45.75 $45.75 $45.75 $183.00 26 Maceys Storm Water Coalition Training $31.91 $31.91 27 Adobe Monthly $16.04 $16.04 28 Color Blaze Chalk for Ambassador Activity $295.90 $295.90 29 Rural Water Association Training $150.00 $150.00 30 Google Monthly $78.00 $78.00 31 Amazon Office Folders $16.01 $16.01 32 Amazon Lanterns Ambassador Activity $61.09 $61.09 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Page 1 SubTotals $4,295.96 $3,448.42 $24.77 $356.99 $1,634.85 $7,180.38 $876.95 $17,818.32 Page 1 Total Amount to be Paid $17,818.32 River Heights City Financial Summary - Updated March 31,2022 Cash Baiance Bv Fund 03/31/22 Net Change % of Total General Fund 236,168.99 270,867.73 34,698.74 10.10% Capital Projects Fund 439,461.62 433,506.75 (5,954.87) 16.16% Water Fund 1,116,975.49 1,126,769.70 9,794.21 42.01% Sewer Fund 841,531.27 850,912.48 9,381.21 31.73% Total Cash Balance 2,634,137.37 2,682,056.66 47,919.29 100.00% %0f %0f Unexpended Budget Time YTD Actual Annual Budget Budget Incurred Incurred Revenue 749,694.63 969,805.00 220,110.37 77.30% 75.07% Expenditures Administrative 112,573.24 192,550.00 79,976.76 58.46% 75.07% Office 19,123.23 26,040.00 6,916.77 73.44% 75.07% Community Affairs 17,246.00 25,550.00 8,304.00 67.50% 75.07% Planning & Zoning 709.86 3,205.00 2,495.14 22.15% 75.07% Public Safety 188,811.76 218,910.00 30,098.24 86.25% 75.07% Roads 93,734.81 146,500.00 52,765.19 63.98% 75:07% Parks & Recreation 47,042.43 73,850.00 26,807.57 63.70% 75.07% Sanitation 135,452.93 150,000.00 14,547.07 90.30% 75.07% School Building 17,383.79 33,200.00 15,816.21 52.36% 75.07% Transfer To CP Fund 100,000.00 100,000.00 - 100.00% Total Expenditures 732,078.05 969,805.00 237,726.95 75.49% 75.07% Net Revenue Over Expenditures 17,616.58 - (17,616.58) Gapitarp^^ i » ; Revenue 909.25 3,000.00 2,090.75 75.07% Reimbursement Income - - - Transfer From General Fund 100,000.00 100,000.00 - Expenditures Administrative 3,000.00 22,000.00 19,000.00 75.07% Parks & Recreation 24,722.91 150,000.00 125,277.09 75.07% Roads 65,659.69 272,400.00 206,740.31 75.07% - - - 75.07% Total Expenditures 93,382.60 444,400.00 351,017.40 75.07% Net Revenue Over Expenditures 7,526.65 (341,400.00) (348,926.65) ']Water(Fund> . * Revenue 381,290.91 457,003.00 75,712.09 83.43% 75.07% Expenditures 151,275.97 507,140.00 355,864.03 29.83% 75.07% Net Revenue Over Expenditures 230,014.94 (50,137.00) (280,151.94) SeWefFuhd ■ ' " •- Revenue 286,590.37 402,703.00 116,112.63 71.17% 75.07% Expenditures 216,589.27 438,890.00 222,300.73 49.35% 75.07% Net Revenue Over Expenditures 70,001.10 (36,187.00) (106,188.10) ' ■:V 1 - - -:V'- ■ ' ^ Combined - All Funds( - . .f Net Revenue Over Expenditures - Combined 325,159.27 (427,724,00) (752,883.27)  4/20/22,12:52 PM Fwd: Rod Rounds Request for Water from River Heights - office@riverheights.org - River Heights City Mail Forwarded message From: Craig Rasmussen <crasmussen@forsaren.com> Date; Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 12:05 PM Subject: RE; Rod Rounds Request for Water from River Heights " >on Thompson <iasonthomDson@riverheiQhts.orQ>. Jonathan Jenkins <tienkins@dainesienkins.com> Jason, Please see the following from Utah State Code; Index Utah Code Title 10 Utah Municipal Code Chapter 8 Powers and Duties of Municipalities Parti General Powers Water rates. Section 22 (Effective 1/1/2021) 10-8-22. Water rates. (7) A municipality that supplies water outside of the municipality's designated water service area shall supply the water only by contract and shall Include in the contract the terms and conditions under which the contract can be terminated. (8) A municipality shall: (a) notify the director of the Division of Drinking Water of a contract the municipality enters into with a person outside of the municipality's designated water service area,including the name and contact information of the person named in each contract; and (b) each year, provide any supplementing or new information regarding a contract described in Subsection .(8).(aX including whether there is no new information to provide at that time. ' 'jnce, as I understand this provision of State Code, to provide water to an entity outside of the "Designated Service Area" you are supposed to do so by a separate ct, and you have to provide record offriis to the State DIv. of Drinking Water. There is a way to define the Designated Service Area to include property outside of ,_ ;lunicipal boundary- to do so you have to prepare and submit a map of your service area and identify the area outside of your municipal boundary. Maintaining a contract and records for service outside of the municipal boundary is problematic and a challenge. Years ago, Hyrum City approved a few water services in the county outside of the city boundary. In at least two instances we are now, or have recently had a lot of problems with these customers. It simply presents a long-term paperwork and tracking problem that the city has to maintain. From a land use perspective -1 strongly recommend that the City tell Mr. Rounds to annex into the City and you will then allow the water connection. The property should either be annexed to River Heights or to Providence (if Providence eventually ends up with the Chugg property). It is not good to leave an island parcel in the county, surrounded by City. If the city provides a water service to Mr. Rounds at this time, when he is outside the City limits, there is no incentive for this property to ever annex into River Heights City. Yet now and in the future he is benefitting from services the City provides, such as plowing public streets through the city for him to access his property. River Heights City is essentially providing services to the parcel, yet all the texes are going to the county. It is fair and appropriate for the property to annex into River Heights City before water service is provided. That way the City benefits from the property tax, as well as payment for water and other City charges. Please contact me if there are other questions about this that 1 may be able to address. Respectfully, Craig R. https://mali.googie.com/mail/u/0/7tab=rm&ogbl#inbox/FMfcgzGpFWSCmmQVvlSGXpFCNdZBCQd 1/1  4/20/22,12:53 PM Fwd: Rod Rounds Request for Water from River Heights - 0ffice@riverheights.0r9 ■ River Heights City Mall Forwarded message From: Jonathan Jenkins <ffenkinsfS)dainesfenkins.com> Date: Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 3:19 PM 5Ct: FW: Rod Rounds Request for Water from River Heights '^ ason Thompson <iasonthomDson@riverheiahts.orQ> Mayor: The idea of providing municipal services to homeowners outside of the city boundaries is inapposite to the primary purpose of the city. We charge taxes and exercise jurisdiction over persons and property within city boundaries, in part, so we can provide those services. When you start allowing others to hook on you are creating a problem because we don't have authority over those homeowners. More importantly, the legislature has given cities a mandate to eliminate islands between the city and the county. By allowing county residents to remain in the county and utilizing municipal services, we are thwarting those instructions from the legislature. Moreover, when a city extends a water line outside of Its coiporate boundaries it places Itself in a position that it has assumed the duty to supply such service to others without discrimination. It becomes a slippery slope. Once we set this precedent it becomes difficult to say no to others and there always seems to be many others. In my experience the contractual obligations required to allow them to hook becomes more trouble than its worth. If a party wants to receive municipal services they need to annex in. There is no reason why that cannot be done here. I would recommend against this action. Please contact me if you have questions. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=rm&ogbI#inbox/FMfcgzGpFWSCmmQVvISGXpFCNdZBCQd 1/1 Safe Places Are Our Foundation Since the very first Club opened in 1860 with the purpose of giving local kids a safe place to go, safety has been the No. 1 priority of Boys & Girls Clubs. After all, safety is where it all begins. Our data shows that environments that are safe, positive and inclusive are essential for young people's development. When kids feel safe, they're empowered to learn, connect with their peers and explore their interests. At Boys & Girls Clubs, kids and teens can rely on a safe, consistent and welcoming environment where they can focus on what's most important- being a kid. The landscape of youth safety has drastically changed in our 160+ year history. From public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic to the Internet's impact on bullying and self-esteem, kids face new threats to their stability and well-being each day. To meet the evolving safety needs of kids, families and communities, Boys & Girls Clubs works continuously to enhance safety policies, practices and trainings to ensure youth are safe and protected. Providing safe spaces for youth is our No. 1 job. 89% of Club members say they can talk to an adult at the Club if they have a problem. Club Programs Club programs are designed to empower youth to excel in school, become good citizens and lead healthy, productive lives. We offer programs for all ages 5 to 18. Sports & Recreation programs help develop physical fitness, reduce stress and promote a positive use of leisure time, appreciation for the environment and interpersonal skills. 80% of Club alumni said the Club had a positive impact on their attitude toward fitness and health. Career 8i Education programs are designed to ensure that all Club members graduate from high school on time, ready for a post-secondary education and a 21st- century career. Participants in the Project Learn program reported 87% fewer missed school days when compared with non-Club youth. Art programs are designed to foster creativity in young people, and give them outlets for self-expression. From photography to dance, our arts programs have something that will inspire everyone. 76% of low-income Club members ages 12-18 reported earning mostly As and Bs, compared to 67% of their peers nationally. Health & Wellness programs develop young people's capacity to engage in positive behaviors to nurture their well-being, set personal goals and grow into self-sufficient adults. 41% of twelfth grade Club girls participate in daily physical activity, compared with 29% of twelfth grade girls nationally. Character & Leadership programs help youth become responsible, caring citizens and acquire skills to participate the democratic process. Program participants also develop leadership skills and gain opportunities for planning, decision-making, contributing to Club and community and celebrating our national heritage. 89% of Club youth said they can stand up for what is right; 91% of Club youth reported that as a leader, they make sure everyone feels important. Inspiring Positive Change Our mission centers on nurturing the enormous potential inside every young person. Kids and teens deserve access to experiences and opportunities that change their lives for the better - regardless of their socio-economic status, color of their skin or other factors that contribute to inequity or prejudice in the U.S. today. Clubs provide inclusive environments where youth of all races, abilities, gender expressions and backgrounds are encouraged to express themselves and deepen their understanding of and respect for others. Through community service, leadership programs and elevating their voices on critical issues such as race equity and social justice. Club kids and teens work together to create positive change and envision a better tomorrow. Boys & Girls Club is committed to furthering our national Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. 95% of Club members say the people at their Club accept them for who they are. Someone Who Cares With caring trained staff, we provide caring guidance and support to kids and teens in order to help them grow into confident, capable adults. In a mentoring program at the local Boys & Girls Club, young people find positive adult mentors in staff who notice their strengths, listen to their concerns and open up doors of possibility. From connecting youth to a program that deepens their interests to sparking their curiosity in a future career field, inspiring mentors help kids and teens explore their full potential. 95% of Club members say the adults at their Club believe that they will be a success. Empowering kids with skills to manage their emotions and build resiliency. Supporting the mental health of kids and teens is more important than ever. Growing up can be hard on a young person of any generation, but today's kids and teens are facing an ever-evolving pandemic, civil unrest and racial inequality, school shootings, social pressures online and systemic inequities that create barriers to success. It's no surprise that young people are feeling stressed. Mental health and wellness are just as important as physical health and fitness and can impact our participation in and enjoyment of life. And for kids and teens, it's critical to nurture mental health and address any mental health concerns early- as 50% of lifelong mental health conditions start by age 14. Clubs equip young people with the skills they need to manage their emotions and build resiliency so they can engage in every opportunity that comes their way. Trained, caring staff knows that the key is to establish a trusting relationship and open dialogue that help staff and youth recognize changes in thoughts,feelings and behaviors, as well as know when to get help. About 20% of young people ages 3 to 17 in the U.S. have a mental, emotional, development or behavioral disorder. Get Involved! The Boys & Girls Club of Northern Utah needs you. Without our communities, companies and partners; youth will be left on their own during critical out-of-school time. Thanks for your interest in Boys & Girls Clubs of Northern Utah. There are many reasons to partner with our organization, and we look forward to discussing opportunities with you in the future. For More Info: Jenny Schuize Boys & Girls Club of Northern Utah 435-723-6224 ext 5342 jschulze@bcbrclub.org Boys & Girls Club of Northern Utah Spring Break 2022  AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CACHE COUNTY AND RIVER HEIGHTS CITY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES This AGREEMENT is made and entered into pursuant to Section 11-13-1, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended, commonly referred to as the Interlocal Cooperation Act, by and between Cache County, a body corporate and politic ofthe State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY",and River Heights City, a municipal corporation ofthe State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as "CITY." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the CITY is desirous of contracting with the COUNTY for the performance ofthe hereinafter described animal control functions within its boundaries by the Coimty ofCache through the Sheriffthereof; and WHEREAS,the CITY and the COUNTY have determined that it is mutually advantageous to each party to enter into this Agreement; and WHEREAS,it is anticipated that the services provided will be compensated by the CITY on a cost basis as hereinafter set forth and the respective entities have determined and agreed that the said amotmt is a reasonable,fair and adequate compensation for the providing ofsuch services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and in compliance vidth and pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Interlocal Cooperation Act as herein above set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The Cache County Sheriffs Office agrees to fumish all necessary animal control and to enforce State laws and City ordinances within the corporate limits of River Heights City, to the extent and in the manner hereinafter set forth. 2. The rendition of such services, the standards of performance, the discipline of deputies, and other matters incident to the performance ofsuch services and the control ofpersonnel so employed shall remain in the COUNTY. In the event of a dispute between the parties as to the extent of duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the minimum level or 1  manner of performance ofsuch services, the determination thereof made by the Sheriff of the COUNTY shall be final and conclusive as between the parties hereto. 3. Without limiting, and in addition to any and all other legal and equitable remedies, the CITY'S Mayor and Council or other representatives, shall have an opportunity to meet and confer with the Sheriff and/or his designated contract representative to discuss any problems arising from its performance, the types of employees who will be performing services under this Agreement, and the anticipated costs for renewing this contract for any successive period(s). 4. It is agreed that the Cache County Sheriffs Office will furnish all animal control services which fall under regular business hours from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm,Monday thru Friday, and all emergency animal control services 24-hours per day, to reasonably enforce all state laws,federal statutes as far as they are applicable, and city ordinances as follows: A. Investigate complaints from the public regarding unimal bites, nuisance, stray, uncontrolled, dangerous, wild, or diseased domestic animals. Emergency animal controlservices will include thefollowing: vicious animals, animal bites and traffic hazards involving domestic animals or livestock. B. Patrol assigned areas,respond to calls for service, and issue citations for violations of animal regulations, ordinances, or laws. C. Impound stray, vicious, or diseased domestic animals or livestock according to city or state regulations, ordinance, or laws. D. It is agreed that the cost per hour for animal control services shall be determined by the Sheriff and the number of hours of service shall be determined by the CITY. The costs and hours of service are detailed in Exhibit A attached. E. It is agreed that the equipment furnished by the CITY is and shall remain the property of the CITY. If said property is a vehicle it shall be maintained, fueled, and insured by the COUNTY during the period ofthis Agreement. 5. For the puipose of performing the services provided herein, the COUNTY shall furnish all necessary labor, administration, equipment, uniforms, insignia, and other equipment necessary and incident to full fill animal control function.  6. It is agreed that in all instances where special supplies, stationary, notices,forms, and the like must be issued in the name ofthe CITY,the same shall be supplied by the CITY at its own expense. 7. For the purpose of performing the services and functions pursuant to this agreement; A. For the purpose of giving official status to the performance thereof, every COUNTY sheriffs deputy and employee engaged in performing any such service and function shall be deemed to be officer or employee ofthe CITY. For purposes of liability, COUNTY deputies or employees shall not be deemed to be CITY officers or employees and the COUNTY shall be completely responsible for them as provided in paragraphs 8 through 11. B. All sheriffs deputies and employees employed by the COUNTY to perform duties under the terms ofthis Agreement shall be COUNTY employees, and shall have no right to any CITY pension, civil service, or any other CITY benefits for services provided hereunder. C. The sheriffs deputies and employees to be provided under the terms of this Agreement shall be appointed by the Cache County Sheriffs Office under its normal rules and practices ofselection and hiring. 8. Subject to the provisions and limitations ofthe Governmental Immimity Act of Utah, the CITY shall be responsible for all damages to persons or property that occurs as a result of the negligence or fault ofthe CITY in connection with the performance ofthis Agreement. The CITY shall indemnify and save the COUNTY free and harmless from all claims that arise as a result of the negligence or wrongful acts of the CITY, its officers, agents or employees. 9. The CITY shall be responsible and indemnify COUNTY for any costs associated with the housing ofimpounded animals or any other costs associated with the Animal Welfare Act ofUtah. 10. Subject to the provisions and limitations ofthe Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, the COUNTY shall be responsible for all damages to persons or property that occurs as a result of the negligence or fault of the COUNTY in connection with the performance of this Agreement. The COUNTY shall indemnify and save the CITY free and harmless from all s  claims that arise as a result ofthe negligence or wrongful acts ofthe COUNTY,its officers, agents, and employees. 11. Except as herein otherwise specified, the CITY shall not be liable for any workers' , compensation claim to any COUNTY employee for injury or sickness arising out ofhis or her employment, and the COUNTY hereby agrees to hold harmless the CITY against any ' such claim. 12. Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Agreement shall be effective July 1, ' 2022 and shall run for a one-year period. With the consent of the River Heights City Council, this Agreement may be renewable for successive one year periods. The Sheriff shall be the administrator ofthis Agreement. In the event the CITY desires to renew this Agreement for any succeeding one year period, the CITY Council, not later than May 1st next preceding the expiration date of this Agreement,shall notify the Sheriffthat it wishes to renew the same,whereupon the Sheriff, not later than May 15th, may notify said CITY Council of its determination concerning such renewal together with any readjusted rates as provided in paragraph 14 below, otherwise, such agreement shall finally terminate at the end of such one year period. Notwithstanding the provision of this paragraph hereinbefore set forth, either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving 60 days prior written notice to the other party. 13. The CITY agrees to pay the amount set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,for the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. The rates in Exhibit A may be readjusted to be effective July 1st ofeach year,ifthis agreement is renewed,to reflect the cost ofsuch service as determined by the Sheriff. 14. The CITY agrees to remit the contract amount to the Cache County Executive, 199 North Main Street, Logan, Utah 84321 on or before December 31, 2022."If such payment is riot remitted to the County Executive's Office when due, the COUNTY is entitled to recover interest on any unpaid balance at the rate ofone percent(1%)per calendar month for each month that any part ofthe full contract amount remains unpaid.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the City of River Heights, by approval of the River Heights City Council, caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk, and the County of Cache has caused this Agreement to be signed by the County Executive and Attested by its Clerk and Keeper ofthe County Seal, all on the day and year appearing below their respective signatures. Cache Countv Approved as to form and as Compatible with State law; Legal Counsel David Zook, County Executive Clerk CITY OF River Heiefats Approved as to form and as Compatible with State law: Legal Counsel Mayor City Recorder  EXHIBIT A This exhibit details the hours contracted for, the cost ofthose hours, and when they will be delivered. The time frame of the contract will be from July 1, 2022 through June 30,2023. The cost to furnish animal control services to River Heights City is $32.00 per hour. CATEGORY AMOUNT HOURS OF SERVICE 109 Contract Funds $6,144.00 TOTAL $6,144.00  AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CACHE COtJNTY AND RIVER HEIGHTS CITY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES This AGREEMENT is made and entered into pursuant to Sections 11-13-101 to -608,Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended, commonly referred to as the Interlocal Cooperation Act, by and between Cache County, a body corporate and politic ofthe State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY", and River Heights City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY." WITNESSETH; WHEREAS,the CITY is desirous of contracting with the COUNTY for the performance ofthe hereinafter described law enforcementfunctions within its boundaries by the County through the Sheriffthereof; and WHEREAS,the CITY and the COUNTY have determined that it is mutually advantageous to each party to enter into this Agreement; and WHEREAS,it is anticipated that the services provided will be compensated by the CITY oh a cost basis as hereinafter set forth and the respective entities have determined and agreed that the said amountis a reasonable,fair and adequate compensation for the providing ofsuch services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and in compliance with and pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Interlocal Cooperation Act as herein above set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The Cache County Sheriffs Office agrees to furnish all necessary law enforcement —protection and to enforce State laws and City ordinances (animal control not included, except for emergencies) within the corporate limits ofRiver Heights City, to the extent and in the manner hereinafter set forth. 2. The rendition of such services, the standards of performance, the discipline of deputies, and other matters incident to the performance ofsuch services and the control ofpersonnel 1  so employed shall remain in the COUNTY. In the event of a dispute between the parties as to the extent of duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the minimum level or manner of performance ofsuch services, the determination thereof made by the Sheriff of the COUNTY shall be final and conclusive as between the parties hereto. 3. Without limiting, and in addition to any and all other legal and equitable remedies, the city's Mayor and Council or other representatives, shall have an opportunity to meet and confer with the Sheriff and/or his designated contract representative to discuss any problems arising from the Sheriffs Office's performance and the types of deputies who will be performing services under this Agreement, and the anticipated costs for renewing this contract for any successive period(s). 4. It is agreed that the Cache County Sheriffs Office will furnish law enforcement investigation, protection, and service to reasonably enforce State laws, Federal statutes as far as they are applicable, and city ordinances as follows: A. Municipal type police services provided under this Agreement include city ordinance enforcement (animal control not included, except for emergencies), traffic enforcement, routine patrol and minor crime investigation, responding to calls for service, community policing activities, policing public parades and other special public events. B. It is agreed that the Sheriffs Office shall continue to provide to the CITY as a basic level of county-wide service the following: Investigation Division support(major crime investigation), NOVA program, School Resource program. Reserve Deputy Sheriff Corp support, Civil Division support (civil and criminal process), emergency management, search and rescue functions, and Drug Task Force participation. C. It is agreed that the cost per hour for municipal type law enforcement services shall be determined by the Sheriffand the number ofhours ofservice shall be determined by the CITY. The costs and hours ofservice are detailed in the attached Exhibit A. D. The CITY will insure that all monies allocated to the CITY by the State's Liquor Control Act grant will be forwarded to the COUNTY to be expended on liquor law enforcement activities exclusively within the CITY. E. It is agreed that the equipment furnished by the CITY is and shall remain the property of the CITY. If said property is a patrol vehicle it shall be maintained, fiieled, and insured by the COUNTY during the period of this Agreement. F. The COUNTY will maintain, at the minimum, the following records and provide monthly reports ofthose records to the CITY pursuant to this agreement: The number and type of calls for services (incidents), and I. The number and type of citations, and II. The number and type of warnings, and v; The numbers of hours ofservice provided. For the purpose ofperforming the services provided herein, the COUNTY shall furnish all necessary labor, administration, equipment, uniforms, insignia, firearms and other equipment necessary and incident to a modem law enforcement agency. It is agreed that in all instances where special supplies, stationary, notices, forms, and the like must be issued in the name ofthe CITY,the same shall be supplied by the CITY at its own expense. For the purpose ofperforming the services and functions pursuant to this agreement; A. For the purpose of giving official .status to the performance thereof, every COUNTY sheriffs deputy and employee engaged in performing any such service and function shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of the CITY. For purposes of liability, COUNTY deputies or employees shall not be deemed to be CITY officers or employees and the COUNTY shall be completely responsible for them as provided in paragraphs 8 through 11. B. All sheriffs deputies and employees employed by the COUNTY to perform duties under the terms ofthis Agreement shall be COUNTY employees, and shall have no right to any CITY pension, civil service, or any other CITY benefits for services provided hereunder. C. The sheriffs deputies and employees to be provided under the terms of this Agreement shall be appointed by the Cache County, Sheriffs Office under its normal rules and practices ofselection and hiring. Subject to the provisions and limitations ofthe Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, the CITY shall be responsible for all damages to persons or property that occur as a result of  the negligence or fault ofthe CITY in connection with the performance ofthis Agreement. The CITY shall indemnify and save the COUNTY free and harmless from all claims that arise as a result of the negligence or wrongfril acts of the CITY, its officers, agents or employees. , 9. Subject to the provisions and limitations of the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, the COUNTY shall be responsible for all damages to persons or property that occur as a result of the negligence or fault of the COUNTY in connection with the performance of this Agreement. The COUNTY shall indemnify and save the CITY free and harmless from all claims that arise as a result ofthe negligence or wrongful acts ofthe COUNTY,its officers, agents, and employees. 10. Except as herein otherwise specified, the CITY shall not be liable for any worker's compensation claim ofany COUNTY employee for injury or sickness arising out ofhis or her employment, and the COUNTY hereby agrees to hold harmless the CITY against any • such claim. 11. Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Agreement shall be effective July 1, 2022 and shall run for a three-year period. With the consent of the River Heights City Council, this Agreement may be renewable for successive three-year periods. The Sheriff shall be the administrator ofthis Agreement. In the event the CITY desires to renew this Agreement for any succeeding three-year period, the CITY Council, not later than May 1st next preceding the expiration date ofthis Agreement,shall notify the Sheriffthat it wishes to renew the same,whereupon the Sheriff, not later than May 15th, may notify said CITY Council of his or her determination concerning such renewal together with any readjusted rates as provided in paragraph 12 below, otherwise, such agreement shall finally terminate at the end of such three year period. Notwithstanding the provision of this paragraph hereinbefore set forth, either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving sixty(60) days prior written notice to the other party. 12. The CITY agrees to pay the amount set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, for the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, The rates in Exhibit A maybe readjusted to be effective July 1st of2024,ifthis agreement is renewed, to reflect the cost of such service as determined by the Sheriff. 13. The CITY agrees to remit the contract amount to the Cache County Executive, 199 North Main Street, Logan, Utah 84321, on or before December 31,2022 for the first year ofthe contract; December 31,2023, for the second year ofthe contract and December 31,2024, for the third year ofthe contract. Ifsuch payment is not remitted to the County Executive's Office when due, the COUNTY is entitled to recover interest on any unpaid balance at the rate ofone percent(1%)per calendar month for each month that any part ofthe full contract amount remains impaid.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the City of River Heights, by approval of the River Heights City Council, caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk, and the County of Cache has caused this Agreement to be signed by the County Executive and Attested by its Clerk and Keeper ofthe County Seal, all on the day and year appearing below their respective signatures. Cache County Approved as to form and as Compatible with State law: Legal Counsel David Zook, County Executive ATTEST:(seal) Clerk CITY OF RIVER HEIGHTS Approved as to form and as Compatible with State law: Legal Counsel Mayor ATTEST:(seal) Clerk  EXHIBIT A This exhibit details the hours contracted for, the cost ofthose hours, and when they will be delivered. The time frame of the contract will be from July 1, 2022, through June 30,2024. The cost to fumish a full-time deputy sheriff equipped to perform law enforcement patrol services to CITY is $52.35 per hour. State Liquor Control Funds will be expended at $52.35 per hour. CONTRACT YEAR CATEGORY HOURS AMOUNT 2022 - 2023 Contract Funds 319 $16,736.00 2023 - 2024 Contract Funds 350 $18,322.00 2024 - 2025 Contract Funds 402 $21,044.00 In addition to paying the Contract Funds identified above,the CITY will pay to the COUNTY under Section 4.D. ofthis Agreement all State Liquor Funds that the CITY receives as it receives them. Under Section 4.D. ofthis Agreement,the County will, in addition to-the hours ofservice identified above, provide hours ofliquor law enforcement activities at the rate of$52.35 per hour imtil all State Liquor Funds received by the CITY and forwarded to the COUNTY have been expended. The COUNTY may supply, at the discretion ofthe Sheriff, additional patrol coverage to the CITY as available. When a deputy working for the CITY has an additional deputy in training working with him or. her, the CITY will be charged for only one deputy. Reserve deputies while performing their volunteer function will not charge their time to the CITY.  n-. URIS VOTING BETTER. FASTER. CHEAPER.IT WORKS. VANTTO LEARN MORE ABOUT RANKED CHOICE VOTING? LEASE VISIT UTAHRCV.COM  UR Y2 Analytics Survey Methodology CV 1,995 Utah voters participated in this survey (1,471 living in RCV cities; 524 in Non-RCV cities) Model of 2021 municipal general election turnout estimated using age, party registration, active status, length of registration, and past election turnout. Data were weighted according to the projections to the likely voter proportions provided by the PPS sample, including weights for registered party, gender, quintiles of turnout probability, congressional district, county, and age to reflect the likely voter population statewide. Margin of error: +-2.6 percentage points  MAJORITY OF RCV VOTERS FOUND METHOD "VERY EASY" UR "How easy or difficult did you find Ranked Choice Voting to use?"(shown to RCV election voters only)(n = 1,123) Very easy 52% 81% total at Least somewhat "easy"to Somewhat easy use Somewhat difficult Very difficult  P-- 90% OF RCV PARTICIPANTS SAY INSTRUCTIONS WERE CLEAR : "How clear or unclear were the instructions you received about how to fill out your Ranked Choice ballot?"(shown to RCV ^ election voters only)(n = 1,102) Very clear 63% 90% total at Least somewhat "clear" Somewhat clear instructions Somewhat unclear Very unclear  f '—I 3-OUT-OF-5 VOTERS IN RCV ELECTIONS LIKED THE PROCESS "How much did you like or dislike using a Ranked Choice Voting ballot?"(shown to RCV election voters only)(n = 1,110) Like a great deal 31% 62% total liked using an SLC voters were 29 RCV ballot Like somewhat percentage points more likely to say they liked RCV than were Sandy residents (80% total SLC compared to Dislike somewhat 51% total Sandy), buta majority ofthe voters in both ofthese cities gave positive reviews. Dislike a great deal  p-1 RCV PARTICIPANTS LIKELIER TO VOTE FOR FAVORITE CANDIDATE I "Some voters claim that in some elections they vote for a candidate that Is not their favorite because their favorite I candidate has little or no chance of winning their vote will be wasted. Were you more or less likely to vote for your favorite candidate in this election?"(shown to RCV election voters only)(n = 1,110) Much more likely 43% 60% total "more Somewhat more likely likely" Neither more nor less likely Somewhat less likely Much less likely  n-1 OVERALL SATISFACTION SAME FOR RCV/NON-RCV ELECTIONS "Overall, how satisfied were you with your voting experience in this year's Municipal Election?"(n = 1,627) Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Not too saUsfied RCV Participants Non-RCV Participants  n-1 RCV PARTICIPANTS SPLIT ON ELECTION RULES PREFERENCE "Which statement comes closest to your opinion for the best method to select your city council members and mayor?" (n = 1,627) Prefer winning candidate gets a sn*t matter to me what Prefer winnirfg candidate majority of votes throuqh RCV system is us#;d the most votcs> majority c RCV Participants Non-RCV Participants  n-- 1 ir» 85% SAY WINNING A MAJORITY OF VOTES IS IMPORTANT UR How Important Is it to you that a candidate wins a majority of the votes in an election?(n = 1,483) Very important Somewhat Important Not at ail important RCV Participants 52% 33 "85% total who say "Important" Non-RCV Participants  VOTERS WITH RCV EXPERIENCE WANT MORE "Which statement comes closest to your opinion for how Utah's elected officials should be chosen in the future?"(n = 1,424) RCV should be used for more Utah RCV should only be used for RCV should not;be used elections, including statewide municipal or other local elections for any Utah elections offices like Governor or Congress RCV Participants Non-RCV Participants  NEW LEGISLATION UR i ; House Bill 264 - Municipal Alternate Voting Methods Amendment QUESTIONS??  n-. ■ I 1 UTAH UK RANKED ^ ' CHOICE VOTING BETTER. FASTER. CHEAPER.IT WORKS. VANTTO LEARN MORE ABOUT RANKED CHOICE VOTING? LEASE VISIT UTAHRCV.COM  Forsgren Associate,inc. 95 West100 South,SuiiB 115 Logan,UT 84321 Tel 435 227-0333 Fax 435227-0334 MemD To: Chris IVGlbank, Council Memba* From: Craig Rasmussen CC: Jason Thompson, Mayor; Sheila Lind,Recorder, Chris Sands,Landscape Architect,Project Biddei^ Date: April 13,2022 Re: River Heights City Park Project(Stewart Hill Paric—Phase 1)Bid Award Recommendation The River Heights City Park Project bid opening was held earlier this afternoon. Two qualifying bids were received for the project, from Raymond Construction and Cache Vall^ Excavation. Forsgren staff conducted the bid opening and completed a tabulation of the bids with a copy attached to this memo for your use and review. The Item Total Cost, Base Bid Total, and Alternate Total Cost as presented by the respective contractors appears accurate with no inadi errors detected. Total Base Bid,Bid Alternate, and Total Bid amounts are as follows: Engineer's Estimate Raymond Construction Cache Valley Excavation Base Bid $359,412.00 $497,636.00 $349,000.00 Bid Alternate $ 76.SQ0.Q0 $ 68.481.50 $ 56.982.50 Total Bid $435,912.00 $566,117.50 $405,982.50 The totals indicated for the Engineers Estimate are slightly modified from the 100% plan estimate due to Bid Addendum changes that revised the Bid Schedule items to adjust the schedule based on contractor questions and to clarify the intent ofthe bid. It is recommended that the City review the bids and the project budget amount. Iffoimd that the budget aligns with the low bid received, it is recommended that the City determine whether to award the Base scope of work or the base plus one or both alternates to Cache Valley Excavation as the verified low bidder for the work. Please contact me with questions,ifany. Stewart Hill Park - Phase 1 - Bid Tabulation River Heights City PhaselpBase Bid (iH^^ \ \^ j ■ / Engineerii^g«Estimate^ i 1 Ba^pndiConst^^^ I '^ajlPy;^COTatipn| . . ' } . .. . Itemtip. ; ; . Classlficatlpn pf^yVbrk j' QTY i i , j 1 .ynltiRjrlce TOTy^iigPsij gn|t,?rice tO.TALCPst]! Uhlt'Rirlcei tQTAu;cPst: Create and Implement Storm Water $ 2,500.00 $ 8,060.00 $ 8,060.00 $ 6,895.00 $ 6,895.00 1 1 Lump Sum $ 2,500.00 Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP) 2 Mobilization and Demobilization 1 Lump Sum $ 33,000.00 $ 33,000.00 $ 59,595.00 $ 59,595.00 $ 13,960.00 $ 13,960.00 3 Construction Layout Survey 1 Lump Sum $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 9,300.00 $ 9,300.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 4 Clear and Grub Hardscape Areas 1 Lump Sum $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 11,111.00 $ 11,111.00 $ 5,998.00 $ 5,998.00 5 Excavation for Parking Areas 850 Cubic Yard $ 6.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 15.00 $ 12,750.00 $ 12.00 $ 10,200.00 6 Granular Borrow (8" thick) 1,700 Square Yard $ "8.00 $ 13,600.00 $ 9.00 $ 15,300.00 $ 6.52, $ 11,084.00 7 Roadbase(4" thick) 1,700 Square Yard $ 6.50 $ 11,050.00 $ 8.00 $ 13,600.00 $ 5.48 $ 9,316.00 8 Curb and Gutter at Parking Areas 900 Linear Feet $ 18.00 $ 16,200.00 $ 35.00 $ 31,500.00 $ 28.20 $ 25,380.00 9 Asphalt Pavement(3" thick) 1,700 Square Yard $ 15.00 $ 25,500.00 $ 23.56 $ 40,052.00 $ 19.00 $ 32,300.00 10 Asphalt Pavement Paint 1 Lump Sum $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 972.00 $ 972.00 11 Disabled Parking Sign 2 Each $ 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,116.00 $ 2,232.00 $ 700:00 $ 1,400.00 5-inch thick Concrete paving with 6-inch 10.00 $ 94,000.00 $ 8.23 $ 77,362.00 $ 6.15 $ 57,810.00 12 9,400 Square Feet. $ thick UTBC 4-Inch thick Concrete sidewalk with 4- 13 900 Square Feet $ 8.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 12.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 5.98 $ 5,382.00 inch thick UTBC 14 Water Service to Restroom 1 Each $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,286.00 $ 3,286.00 $ 2,650.00 $ 2,650.00 8" C-900 Water Line w/ Fittings and $ 120.00 $ 82,440.00 $ 81.05 $ 55,681.35 15 687 Linear Feet $ 76.00 $ 52,212.00 Street.Repair 16 Connect to Existing Water Line 2 Each $ 2,600.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 17,360.00 $ 34,720.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 28,000.00 17 Yard Hydrant at Future Picnic Shelter 1 Each $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,338.00 $ 2,338.00 $ 1,885.00 $ 1,885.00 Stewart Hill Park - Phase 1 - Bid Tabulation River Heights City 13-Apr-22 Foi^gpn^ ^ cn44&cia£eA-:Mtik Phase ;ii Base Bid (riardsca^e and < ; lEriglneeflhg/Estimate j ; iRaymohdiConstructloh ; Cache ^aijey&cayatlon; > r ■ ■ -i Item No. ! ClasslflcatlphpfKyvprk ; : gvfj 1 ■ 'Vnit' j runlt^^rlce, 'XQTALCost| f 'UnlliRrice^ TpjALpMf'' .Unit Price TpfAL Cpst' Meter Service for Culinary Water and 18 1 Each $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 7,277.00 $ 7,277.00 $ 5,868.00 $ 5,868.00 Future Landscape irrigation Sewer Service to Future Restroom w/ 4' 19 1 Each $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 11,834.00 $ 11,834.00 $ 8,941.00 $ 8,941.00 SSMH 20 Bio-retention 265 Cubic Yard $ 50.00 $ 13,250.00 $ 48,00 $ 12,720.00 $ 28.00 $ 7,420.00 21 Decorative Metal Fence 90 Linear Feet $ 100.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 106.00 $ 9,540.00 $ 92.00 $ 8,280.00 Power to Site (Through RHC & Rocky 22 1 Lump Sum $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,052.00 $ 9,052.00 $ 11,487.65 $ 11,487.65 Mntn Power Contract) Eiectrical Service (Stand Alone 23 1 Each $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 8,401.00 $ 8,401.00 $ 7,124.00 $ 7,124.00 Installation) 24 Not Used 0 Each $ 10,000.00 $ $ $ $ $ 25 Stub for Parking Lot Light Pole 4 Each $ 5,500.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 4,898.00 $ 19,592.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 15,600.00 Stub for Restroom Building 26 1 Lump Sum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 496.00 $ 496.00 $ 4,108.00 $ 4,108.00 Power/Lights 27 Stub for Pavilion Power/Lights 1 Lump Sum $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,418.00 $ 2,418.00 $ 5,258.00 $ 5,258.00 " - Tbtal'Base^BidT^^^ i'ST"" Add:Alternate.#1 — " - L ... . ' 5-inch thick Concrete paving with 6-inch 12A 5,850 Square Feet $ 10.00 '$ 58,500.00 $ 8.23 $ 48,145.50 $ 6.65 $ 38,902.50 thick UTBC Supply and Install Parking Lot Light 25A 4 Each $ 4,500.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 5,084.00 $ 20,336.00 $ 4,520.00 $ 18,080.00 Pole $ Total Bid Alternate 76,500.00 $ 68,481.50 $ 56,982.50 Total Bid Base Bid'+ Bid Alternate $ 435,912.00 $ 566,117.50 $ 405,982.50