City Council

City of San Bruno: 2025 Community Priorities Survey January 13, 2025 Page 1 January 13, 2026 Overview and Research Objectives The City of San Bruno commissioned Godbe Research to conduct a survey of local voters with the following research objectives: ➢ Gauge overall perceptions of quality of life in San Bruno, direction of the City; ➢ Gauge overall satisfaction with the City’s provision of services; ➢ Assess importance of and satisfaction with current and potential future City services and facilities; ➢ Assess potential voter support for hypothetical parcel tax and land use measures; ➢ Prioritize information about the parcel tax and land use measures; ➢ Identify any differences in voter support due to demographic and/or voter behavioral characteristics. Page 2 January 13, 2026  Methodology Overview ➢ Data Collection Landline (2), cell (114), and text to online (287) interviewing ➢ Universe 18,514 likely November 2026 voters in the City of San Bruno ➢ Fielding Dates November 10-18, 2025 ➢ Interview Length 25 minutes ➢ Sample Size n=403 ➢ Margin of Error Likely November 2026 voters + 4.83% The data have been weighted to reflect the actual population characteristics of likely voters in the Page 3 City of San Bruno in terms of their gender, age, and political party type. January 13, 2026 Key Findings Page 4 January 13, 2026  Q1. Opinion on Quality of Life in San Bruno Likely November 2026 Voters DK/NA 0.1% Poor Excellent 6.5% 12.5% Just fair 23.4% Good 57.5% 9/23 Survey 11/25 Survey 11/24 Voters 11/26 Voters Total Excellent + Good 64.2% 70.0% Total Poor 5.8% 6.5% Ex + Good / Poor 11.7 10.8 Page 5 January 13, 2026  Q2. Satisfaction With the City’s Provision of Services Likely November 2026 Voters DK/NA 6.6% Very satisfied Very dissatisfied 11.7% 19.8% Somewhat dissatisfied 16.0% Somewhat satisfied 45.9% 3/20 Survey 5/22 Survey 9/23 Survey 11/25 Survey 11/20 Voters 11/22 Voters 11/24 Voters 11/26 Voters Total Satisfaction 63.9% 58.8% 60.1% 65.6% Total Dissatisfaction 20.2% 31.4% 31.6% 27.7% Ratio Sat to Dissat 3.2 1.87 1.9 2.37 Page 6 January 13, 2026  Q3. Importance of City Services & Facilities I Likely November 2026 Voters 2.55 92.5% E. Rapidly responding to 9-1-1 emergency calls 2.61 Tier 1 X. Maintaining city streets and roads, and repairing 2.44 91.2% potholes 2.52 2.29 86.2% I. Attracting and retaining local businesses 2.33 W. Supporting the local economy, including 2.23 increasing local jobs 2.19 U. Maintaining storm drains and provide flood 2.17 protection 2.21 2.16 Tier 2 Q. Providing safe pedestrian sidewalks and crosswalks 2.16 2.15 S. Maintaining parks and open space 2.20 P. Encouraging more stores, restaurants, and other 2.15 entertainment venues downtown 2.23 2026 2.11 2024 77.5% A. Maintaining neighborhood police patrols 2.21 0 1 2 3 Not at All Not Too Very Extremely Important Important Important Important Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 7 “Extremely Important” = +4, “Very Important” = +3, “Not Too Important” = +2, and “Not at All Important” = 0. January 13, 2026  Q3. Importance of City Services & Facilities II Likely November 2026 Voters 2.08 79.0% O. Upgrading and maintaining storm drains 2.15 F. Enhancing youth crime prevention and gang 2.06 intervention programs 2.22 2.00 N. Providing adequate parks and recreation facilities 2.11 1.98 V. Improving street lights 1.75 Tier 3 1.95 M. Maintaining youth and teen services 2.04 1.94 D. Maintaining the San Bruno senior programs 1.95 1.92 B. Managing traffic on City streets 1.90 2026 T. Improving neighborhood parks, ballfields and 1.92 69.1% 1.95 2024 playgrounds 0 1 2 3 Not at All Not Too Very Extremely Important Important Important Important Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 8 “Extremely Important” = +4, “Very Important” = +3, “Not Too Important” = +2, and “Not at All Important” = 0. January 13, 2026  Q3. Importance of City Services & Facilities III Likely November 2026 Voters T3 Cont’d 1.88 68.1% K. Providing programs to reduce homelessness 2.02 1.83 66.5% R. Providing recreation programs 1.84 Tier 4 1.79 L. Providing affordable housing 1.84 H. Maintaining San Bruno's unique community 1.73 1.66 58.2% character 1.52 52.2% Y. Providing safe bike paths and routes 1.52 Tier 5 1.40 J. Building a new library 1.36 1.38 C. Building a new fire station 1.37 40.9% 2026 Tier 6 1.22 36.3% G. Updating the Police Station 1.27 2024 0 1 2 3 Not at All Not Too Very Extremely Important Important Important Important Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 9 “Extremely Important” = +4, “Very Important” = +3, “Not Too Important” = +2, and “Not at All Important” = 0. January 13, 2026  Q4. Satisfaction With City Services & Facilities I Likely November 2026 Voters 0.90 56.6% E. Rapidly respond to 9-1-1 emergency calls 0.77 0.77 N. Provide adequate parks and recreation facilities 0.58 0.73 Tier 1 D. Maintain the San Bruno senior programs 0.60 0.70 63.9% S. Maintain parks and open space 0.56 0.68 55.1% R. Provide recreation programs 0.39 T. Improve neighborhood parks, ballfields and 0.57 playgrounds 0.44 Tier 2 0.53 M. Maintain youth and teen services 0.27 40.2% 0.47 55.1% Q. Provide safe pedestrian sidewalks and crosswalks 0.37 2026 Tier 3 0.47 G. Update the Police Station 0.37 2024 33.6% -2 -1 0 1 2 Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 10 “Very Satisfied” = +2, “Somewhat Satified” = +1, “Somewhat Dissatisfied” = -1, and “Very Dissatisfied” = -2. January 13, 2026  Q4. Satisfaction With City Services & Facilities II Likely November 2026 Voters 0.43 O. Upgrade and maintain storm drains 0.29 44.2% 0.43 U. Maintain storm drains and provide flood protection 0.37 0.39 H. Maintain San Bruno's unique community character 0.33 Tier 3- Cont’d 0.39 A. Maintain neighborhood police patrols 0.23 0.36 C. Build a new fire station 0.26 0.33 Y. Provide safe bike paths and routes 0.28 F. Enhance youth crime prevention and gang 0.31 intervention programs 0.16 2026 0.27 45.5% B. Manage traffic on City streets 0.39 2024 -2 -1 0 1 2 Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 11 “Very Satisfied” = +2, “Somewhat Satified” = +1, “Somewhat Dissatisfied” = -1, and “Very Dissatisfied” = -2. January 13, 2026  Q4. Satisfaction With City Services & Facilities III Likely November 2026 Voters Tier 4 0.26 V. Improve street lights 0.36 46.2% W. Support the local economy, including increasing 0.04 0.05 29.3% local jobs 0.03 J. Build a new library 0.00 Tier 5 -0.09 K. Provide programs to reduce homelessness -0.23 -0.12 I. Attract and retain local businesses -0.12 32.3% -0.17 24.9% L. Provide affordable housing -0.33 Tier 6 P. Encourage more stores, restaurants, and other -0.19 entertainment venues downtown -0.26 2026 -0.23 X. Maintain city streets and roads, and repair potholes -0.18 2024 37.3% -2 -1 0 1 2 Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 12 “Very Satisfied” = +2, “Somewhat Satified” = +1, “Somewhat Dissatisfied” = -1, and “Very Dissatisfied” = -2. January 13, 2026  Q3 & 4. Importance-Satisfaction Comparison Likely November 2026 Voters Importance Satisfaction 3/4E. Rapidly responding to 9-1-1 emergency calls 2.55 0.90 3/4X. Maintaining city streets and roads, and repairing potholes 2.44 -0.23 3/4I. Attracting and retaining local businesses 2.29 -0.12 3/4W. Supporting the local economy, including increasing local jobs 2.23 0.04 3/4U. Maintaining storm drains and provide flood protection 2.17 0.43 3/4Q. Providing safe pedestrian sidewalks and crosswalks 2.16 0.47 3/4S. Maintaining parks and open space 2.15 0.70 3/4P. Encouraging more stores, restaurants, and other entertainment venues downtown 2.15 -0.19 3/4A. Maintaining neighborhood police patrols 2.11 0.39 3/4O. Upgrading and maintaining storm drains 2.08 0.43 3/4F. Enhancing youth crime prevention and gang intervention programs 2.06 0.31 3/4N. Providing adequate parks and recreation facilities 2.00 0.77 3/4V. Improving street lights 1.98 0.26 3/4M. Maintaining youth and teen services 1.95 0.53 3/4D. Maintaining the San Bruno senior programs 1.94 0.73 3/4B. Managing traffic on City streets 1.92 0.27 3/4T. Improving neighborhood parks, ballfields and playgrounds 1.92 0.57 3/4K. Providing programs to reduce homelessness 1.88 -0.09 3/4R. Providing recreation programs 1.83 0.68 3/4L. Providing affordable housing 1.79 -0.17 3/4H. Maintaining San Bruno's unique community character 1.73 0.39 3/4Y. Providing safe bike paths and routes 1.52 0.33 3/4J. Building a new library 1.40 0.03 3/4C. Building a new fire station 1.38 0.36 3/4G. Updating the Police Station 1.22 0.47 Page 13 January 13, 2026  Q4 & 5. Importance-Satisfaction Comparison Likely November 2024 Voters Importance Satisfaction 7/8E. Rapidly responding to 9-1-1 emergency calls 2.61 0.77 7/8X. Maintaining city streets and roads, and repairing potholes 2.52 -0.18 7/8I. Attracting and retaining local businesses 2.33 -0.12 7/8P. Encouraging more stores, restaurants, and other entertainment venues downtown 2.23 -0.26 7/8F. Enhancing youth crime prevention and gang intervention programs 2.22 0.16 7/8A. Maintaining neighborhood police patrols 2.21 0.23 7/8U. Maintaining storm drains and provide flood protection 2.21 0.37 7/8S. Maintaining parks and open space 2.20 0.56 7/8W. Supporting the local economy, including increasing local jobs 2.19 0.05 7/8Q. Providing safe pedestrian sidewalks and crosswalks 2.16 0.37 7/8O. Upgrading and maintaining storm drains 2.15 0.29 7/8N. Providing adequate parks and recreation facilities 2.11 0.58 7/8M. Maintaining youth and teen services 2.04 0.27 7/8K. Providing programs to reduce homelessness 2.02 -0.23 7/8D. Maintaining the San Bruno senior programs 1.95 0.60 7/8T. Improving neighborhood parks, ballfields and playgrounds 1.95 0.44 7/8B. Managing traffic on City streets 1.90 0.39 7/8R. Providing recreation programs 1.84 0.39 7/8L. Providing affordable housing 1.84 -0.33 7/8V. Improving street lights 1.75 0.36 7/8H. Maintaining San Bruno's unique community character 1.66 0.33 7/8Y. Providing safe bike paths and routes 1.52 0.28 7/8C. Building a new fire station 1.37 0.26 7/8J. Building a new library 1.36 0.00 7/8G. Updating the Police Station 1.27 0.37 Page 14 January 13, 2026  Q5. Support for Flat Rate Tax Sample A Definitely No In order to maintain rapid 9-1-1 26.9% emergency response, enhance Definitely Yes wildfire prevention, neighborhood fire 21.1% protection, maintain neighborhood police patrols, maintain parks and open space, provide adequate recreation facilities including ballfields and playgrounds, and Probably Yes maintain library services, would you 30.6% support or oppose a flat tax on all DK/NA 7.8% parcels in San Bruno, including single-family homes and business parcels? Probably No Total Support 13.5% 51.7% Page 15 January 13, 2026  Q6. Support for Tax on Non-Residential & Multifamily Residential Buildings Sample B Definitely No In order to maintain rapid 9-1-1 13.6% Definitely Yes emergency response, enhance 23.8% wildfire prevention, neighborhood fire protection, maintain neighborhood police patrols, maintain parks and DK/NA open space, provide adequate 9.0% recreation facilities including Probably Yes ballfields and playgrounds, and 39.8% maintain library services, would you support or oppose a property tax on non-residential buildings and multifamily residential buildings Probably No based on building size? 13.9% Total Support 63.6% Page 16 January 13, 2026  Q7. Features of the Measure I Likely November 2026 Voters 64.9% J. The proposal would not impact residential single family homes, only non-residential buildings and multifamily 0.77 residential buildings would be assessed based on building size C. The proposal would provide rapid response to 9-1-1 0.69 emergency calls Tier 1 A. None of the money raised by the proposal would be 0.69 used for City administrator salaries G. The proposal would maintain parks and open space 0.66 D. The proposal would enhance wildfire prevention 0.62 57.9% -2 -1 0 1 2 Much Less Somewhat Somewhat Much More Likely Less Likely More Likely Likely Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 17 “Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. January 13, 2026  Q7. Features of the Measure II Likely November 2026 Voters Tier 1-Cont’d H. The proposal would maintain library programs for 0.61 57.8% children, teens, adults and seniors F. The proposal would maintain neighborhood police 53.5% 0.53 patrols Tier 2 E. The proposal would enhance youth crime prevention 0.52 and gang intervention programs 51.9% Tier 3 I. The rate would be the same for all parcels in San Bruno 0.06 37.3% Tier 4 B. With continued high inflation rates, high gas and -0.17 30.3% grocery prices, and high mortgage interest rates now is the wrong time to increase taxes on businesses -2 -1 0 1 2 Much Less Somewhat Somewhat Much More Likely Less Likely More Likely Likely Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 18 “Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. January 13, 2026  Q8. Support for Height Limit Options Sample A Definitely No 17.2% Shall the City of San Bruno measure be adopted rescinding the 1977 Definitely Yes zoning ordinance that requires voter 25.9% approval of any new development that exceeds specified height limits, because it has been superseded by DK/NA state law which requires housing to 15.5% be approved regardless of height? Probably Yes 27.2% Probably No Total Support 14.2% 53.2% Page 19 January 13, 2026  Q9. Support for Height Limit Options Sample B Definitely No 20.1% Shall the City of San Bruno measure be adopted amending the 1977 zoning Definitely Yes ordinance to remove the requirement 20.9% for voter approval for any developments along El Camino Real, San Mateo Avenue, San Bruno Avenue east of Interstate 280, Sneath Lane DK/NA east of Interstate 280, and retain voter 14.0% Probably Yes approval for increasing heights in 30.5% single family home neighborhoods? Probably No Total Support 14.4% 51.4% Page 20 January 13, 2026  Q10. Height Limit Options Information I Likely November 2026 Voters G. The measure facilitates new commercial projects that 65.0% provide City revenue that can support pothole repair, fire 0.79 station upgrades and neighborhood police patrols Tier 1 K. The measure would restore control over local zoning 0.63 decisions B. The measure facilitates new commercial projects that provide City revenue that can support pothole repair, fire 0.59 52.1% station upgrades and neighborhood police patrols 53.3% I. The measure would protect the character of San Bruno 0.56 neighborhoods Tier 2 F. The measure would balance commercial and housing 0.51 52.1% development along commercial and transit corridors -2 -1 0 1 2 Much Less Somewhat Somewhat Much More Likely Less Likely More Likely Likely Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 21 “Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. January 13, 2026  Q10. Height Limit Options Information Likely November 2026 Voters 35.7% E. The measure would restore control over local zoning 0.31 decisions Tier 3 A. The measure aligns the City of San Bruno with other cities in San Mateo County and provides more flexibility to 0.30 38.8% approve non-residential and revenue generating projects Tier 4 H. The measure would prevent the creation of new housing -0.04 35.2% to meet the needs of the region D. The measure would eliminate State Law protections for 23.0% neighborhoods and allow the City to bypass local City -0.44 voters in order to develop or acquire low income housing Tier 5 J. If the measure is approved voters would lose their direct say in development decisions related to increasing heights -0.59 in San Bruno C. If the measure is approved voters would lose their -0.62 18.7% direct say in development decisions related to increasing heights in San Bruno -2 -1 0 1 2 Much Less Somewhat Somewhat Much More Likely Less Likely More Likely Likely Note: The above rating questions have been abbreviated for charting purposes, and responses were recoded to calculate mean scores: Page 22 “Much More Likely” = +2, “Somewhat More Likely” = +1, “No Effect” = 0, “Somewhat Less Likely” = -1, and “Much Less Likely” = -2. January 13, 2026 www.godberesearch.com California and Corporate Offices 1220 Howard Avenue, Suite 250 Burlingame, CA 94010 Nevada Office 59 Damonte Ranch Parkway, Suite B309 Reno, NV 89521 Page 23 January 13, 2026 Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) Nick Pegueros City Council Administrative Services Director / CFO January 13, 2026 Agenda  ACFR background  General Fund  Enterprise Funds  Wrap-up 2 Objective  Present the audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. 3 What is the “Audit”  The audit assesses  Material accuracy of the financial statements (ACFR)  Compliance with laws, regulations, grant requirements  Internal controls against fraud  Required by  San Bruno Municipal Code  California law  State and Federal Grantors  Badawi & Associates serves as the City’s independent auditor 4 Independent Audit Results The independent auditor issued an unmodified opinion, the highest level of assurance.  Financial statements “present fairly, in all material respects” the financial position and results of operations  Compliance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). 5 General Fund (including Measure G) 6 General Fund Results $ million As of June 30, 2025 Revenues $72.5 Expenditures 56.4 Transfers in/(out) (10.9) Net Revenue/ (Expense) $5.2 7 General Fund Revenue Trends $ million 50.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 - Taxes Licenses, permits, Fines, Intergovernmental charges for investments, other services 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 8 General Fund Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement (TRSA) $ million • Executed in 2020 between City and Walmart.com As of 6/30/24 2024-25 As of 6/30/25 Total $47.0 $17.3 $64.3 City $25.6 $9.2 $34.7 Walmart.com $21.4 $8.1 $29.5 9 General Fund Expenditure Trends $ million 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 - General Public safety Public works Community Community Capital outlay Government services development 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 10 General Fund Fund Balance, June 30, 2025 $ million $66.1 million Other, $3.3 Contingency, $10.8 Budget Unassigned, stabilization, $30.0 $12.6 One-time revenue, $9.4 11 General Fund Interfund Advances, June 30, 2025 $ million Other Funds, $1.2 Parking Fund, $2.0 $5.6 million RAC Fund, $2.4 12 General Fund Takeaways Accounting changes • Recreation and Aquatic Center Special Revenue Fund • Community Development Special Revenue Fund Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement • $9.2 million received in 2024-24 • Sole contributor to $5.2 million net revenue for General Fund Other • Interfund loans and advances total $5.6 million • Fund balance policy review and recommended updates 13 Enterprise Funds 14 Enterprise Funds Operating income/ (loss) $ million 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 - Water Wastewater CityNet Stormwater Parking (1.0) (2.0) 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 15 Enterprise Funds: CityNet Customers Assets • Income/Loss Employees • Equipment • Liabilities • Vehicles • Community • Buildings Benefits Fund Operations Closeout 16  Enterprise Funds: Stormwater • Personnel • Supplies & Equipment Develop FY27 Budget • Internal services • Income/Loss backfilled by General Fund annually Transfer FY26 • Continue work to identify operating revenue to New Fund 17  Enterprise Funds: Parking Personnel and internal service Revenue and allocations expenditure FY26 Mid- update Equipment year FY27 Budget replacement Amendment Loan terms Loan payment 18 Wrap-up 19 Upcoming Actions  Mid-year  Recreation and Aquatic Center 2024-25 operating deficit  Review Fund Balance Policy and re-balance reserves  Internal service funds and equipment reserve  Year-end  2022-23 Winter Storm emergency reimbursements  Fund updates  CityNet closeout  Stormwater Special Revenue Fund 20 Congratulations! City-wide effort Special note to the finance team:  Jeff Lichtenstein, Accounting Supervisor  Yu-Chiao Chao, Accountant  John Mercado, Accountant  Esther Garibay, Dana Liu, Kathy O’Malley 21 Recommendation  Receive and File the audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), and required reports, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. 22 QUESTIONS 23