Board of Adjustment

BOA MlnuteS Novembe「 8, 2021 The motion carried 4‑0‑0. 4. SSBOA"801 The Board lS being aSked to conslde「 app「oving, denying, amending o「 「evising of the request of Mary Des」a「lalS 「ega「ding a Speciai ExceptiOn tO the Sand Sp「ingS Zoning Code, SectlOnS 5 03 B l d and 5 03 B工g to aliow a 264 sfaiトmetai detached accesso「y buiiding ln addition to 570 sfofexISting aCCeSSOry bulidingS at 505 Ba「「 D「. City Plamer Bates presented the sta什report. The sub」eCt PrOPerty lS iocated ln a SectlOn, TownshlP and Range that has seve「ai ia「ge detached accessory structures but most requests fo「 an ali‑metai facade have been denred sinCe O「dinanCe 1293, regardlng exterIOrfacades, WaS PaSSed ln late 2016 The appiicantdesi「esto attach a 264 sf lean‑ to type st「uctu「e to an existlng 440 sf ail‑metal detached st「uctu「e. The finiSh on the new St「uCtu「e Wili be the same as the existing st「uctu「e with a two‑tOne tauPe and b「own finish. AppilCant WOuld llke to store a classiC Ca「 in the new st「uctu「e. PubiiC Wo「ks has revieWed and advISed thatthe「e is a lO utilltyeaSementOn the north side ofthe p「operty The new accessory st「ucture w用not enc「oach on the easement. The「e lS aiso a lOx13 (130 sf) accessory structure on the property Staff s 「ecommendation is that the 13O sf buiIding be 「emoved and the new accessory buiiding be aliowed AppllCant Mary Des」ariaiS WaS PreSent for questIOnS. AppiiCant Stated she wouid llke to keep the 130 sfsto「age building as she keeps herlawn equiPment in that st「uctu「e The 440 sf st「uctu「e lS uSed fo「 her c「afts. Discussion was heid 「ega「ding the paving 「equl「ement lf the new structure is used as a ga「age Applieant stated she couid store the ciassiC Ca「 in he「 two‑Ca「 attaChed garage and move ltemS f「om the garage to the P「OPOSed accesso「y buiiding to avoid the paving 「equi「ement Fu巾he「 dlSCuSSion was held 「ega「dIng the type of door that wouId be inStailed on the new st「ucture, if an OVe「head d00「 WaS lnStaiied, the structu「e wouid be considered a garage and paving WOuid be 「equi「ed if an ove「head doo「was ailowed and the paving 「equi「ement walVed, a futu「e owne「 might be confused as to the aiiowed use Eddie Bruton, 406 Antigua Ct , SPOke in favo「ofthe appllCatiOn Chai「person Philiips stated tha=he Boa「d couid consider the 「equests as one o「 two dlffe「ent itemS. ChaI「Pe「SOn PhilIiPS made a motion to app「ove SSBOA‑801 aiiowIng a 264 sf a=‑metai detached accessory buiiding Subject to the buiiding being attached to the exiSting 440 sf accessory buiiding, the same two‑tOne COio「 scheme of b「own and taupe being used, that PaV‑ng WOuid be 「equi「ed if an ove「head doo「 is const「ucted as part of the new buiiding, that paving WOuid not be 「equi「ed if double doo「s a「e const「ucted as part of the new build'ng and that the exiSt‑ng 130 sf buildlng nOt be 「equi「ed to be removed Mr Zlmme「man SeCOnded the motiOn. With no further dISCuSSion, ChairPe「SOn Ph用IPS Cailed fo「 the vote 「eco「ded as foliows: Ms Dinkel, aye; Mr Zimmerman, aye; Mr. Phi=ips, aye; Mr. Tockey, aye Page2of3 l ゝ/ら万‑