City Council

OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 CITY GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF CITY COUNCIL SAVANNAH, GEORGIA FEBRUARY 20, 2014 The regular meeting of Council was held this date at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The Invocation was given by Reverend Lolita Shelby Hickman, Pastor of Trinity Baptist Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PRESENT: Mayor Edna Jackson, Presiding Mayor Pro-Tem Van Johnson, II Alderman Tony Thomas, Chairman of Council Alderman Mary Osborne, Vice-Chairman of Council Aldermen Mary Ellen Sprague, Carol Bell, Estella Shabazz John Hall and Tom Bordeaux City Manager Stephanie Cutter City Attorney W. Brooks Stillwell Assistant City Attorney William Shearouse Assistant City Attorney Lester B. Johnson, III MINUTES Upon motion of Alderman, seconded by Alderman Osborne, seconded by Alderman Bell and unanimously carried the Summary/Final minutes of the City Council W ork Session/City Manager’s Briefing of February 6, 2014 and the Summary/Final minutes of the City Council meeting of February 6, 2014 were approved. Upon motion of Alderman, seconded by Alderman Osborne, seconded by Alderman Bell and unanimously carried the Summary/Final minutes of the City Council retreat of February 11, 2014 were approved. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Shabazz, unanimous approval was given for the Mayor to sign an affidavit and resolution for an Executive Session held today to discuss litigation and real estate where no votes were taken. (SEE RESOLUTIONS). Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried the agenda was amended to add three items: Recognition of international guests from Germany. Ms. Ardis Wood to present a check for replacement of street lighting. The settlement of a claim against the City. 1 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Downtown Savannah Authority Intent to Issue Bonds on behalf of the City of Savannah. The Downtown Savannah Authority (DSA) intends to issue bonds to assist the City of Savannah to re-finance the Series 2009B bonds at lower interest rates to achieve debt service savings for the City. This is an announcement only; no Council action is required for this agenda item. (The first reading of the Authority’s application to the City to issue the bonds is also on the agenda). PRESENTATIONS Ms. MarRonde L. Lotson, appeared to introduce international guests from Halle Germany our Sister City. With her is Axel Kohler, Director of Art with Halle Opera House, David Pratt, Executive. Director, Savannah Philharmonic and Melissa Emery, Board Chair of Savannah Philharmonic. Mr. Kohler came forward to state that this is his second visit to Savannah and he is also bringing greetings from the Mayor of Halle. He was here three years ago, and met Peter Shannon while here when the idea came to do the Messiah. They will be performing together on Friday, February 28, 2014 at St. John’s Cathedral. He presented Mayor Jackson with gifts. Mayor Jackson thanked him for the gifts and commended them along with the Savannah Philharmonic for the concert on Friday night which is sold out. Ms. Emery thanked the City for its support of this concert, by partnering with the City and the German Heritage Society. They were proud to do the “Picnic in the Park” and look forward to doing it again. Mayor Jackson presented gifts to Mr. Kohler from the City of Savannah. Ms. Ardis Wood appeared to state that many years ago she had a conversation with Mr. Herb Traub on lighting and at that time he stated the Rotary Club got a wonderful design to light the monuments in the squares, but over the years the bulbs burned out and they were not replaced. She thanked Council for partnering with her. The City had the money for the lighting, but not the design. Christian Sottile was hired by her to do the design. There is a reference book that is filled with designed. She showed a before and after picture of the lighting and presented a copy to each member of Council. She paid for the design and presented a copy of the check to Council. Mayor Jackson thanked her and appreciates and will recognize her partnership. Beth Aldrich, Executive Director of Girls on the Run Coastal Georgia and Pat Mathis, a board member appeared to announce the beginning of the spring season and the date of the 5K Celebration Run. Beginning next week they will host 24 programs reaching over 300 girls. Those in the community have stepped up to help with this character development program for girls. They have two staff members and over 150 volunteers. Their community 5K that is open to everyone will be hosted at Savannah State University on Saturday, May 17, 2014 said it begins at 8:30 a.m. and there is a $30 registration fee which begins at Tiger Stadium. Mayor Jackson said this is a wonderful program and she hopes our residents will come out and participate. Alderman Shabazz asked how young women can get involved. Ms. Aldrich said they have programs set up at the schools in Chatham, Bryan and Effingham County. There is a registration fee, but no one is turned down. If your school does not have it, the girls can go to another school in their area. Alderman Hall said Ms. Mathis is one of the partners in building the new Isle of Hope School. 2 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE HEARINGS Deborah C. Carroll for Murphy’s, requesting to transfer a liquor, beer and wine (drink) license from 409 W. Congress Street to 305-307 W. River Street, which had a 2013 liquor, beer and wine (drink) license and is located between Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard and Barnard Street Ramp in District 1. Recommend approval. Ms. Shelly Lowther, Ms. Carroll’s daughter with Attorney James Byrnes, appeared representing Ms. Carroll and Murphy’s. Ms. Carroll is a school teacher and unable to appear today. Ms. Lowther is the manager of the bar. Alderman Bordeaux said he has some concerns about having the person whose name appears on the license request be present at this public hearing today and he does not think we should proceed. She may work there, but she is not the applicant. Attorney Byrnes said Ms. Lowther is the manager and has extensive knowledge of the business. Mayor Jackson asked Mr. Bordeaux if he spoke with the Police Department on this procedure and if so, we need to make sure the staff is aware and notifies the applicant. Alderman Osborne said when this came up before; we talked about the fact if we had multiple owners of businesses that it would be unfair for them to come up for each individual license. It is reasonable that if the person has a representative of the license holder or applicant and served as a responsible party, they could come forward. Ms. Lowther said this is an existing business and they are only moving the location. There lease was up in February and they needed to find a place to go. Alderman Bordeaux said evidently there is a discrepancy between what the state and city requires. Sgt. Andrea Williams came forward. Alderman Bordeaux said they had a conversation in the past as to how to deal with the holder of the license for bars and restaurants in reference to who is to have it. Sgt. Williams responded that their preference is that the licensee appears before Council, but they can also ask a responsible party such as the manager to represent them. We can also see the manager when we go there, but the applicant is the responsible party. Alderman Bell said she spoke to the City Attorney but there is no legal requirement that the applicant be present and it is unfair to the applicant today and they have not been notified. If we want to change it, then that could be discussed and a decision can be made by Council at a later date. Alderman Bordeaux said he will withdraw his objection as he does not want to inconvenience anyone. Attorney Stillwell said that he sent Council an opinion on this as there is no requirement in the ordinance for anyone to appear. If you oppose the ordinance then you need to appear. It is in Council’s preview to make the request for them to appear. Alderman Osborne said she stands by her comments as it is an inconvenience for the applicant who owns multiple locations to keep coming up as in the end they still are held responsible. Attorney Stillwell said if the bar is owned by an owner, they are the applicant. If it is a corporation, the applicant can be the owner or a responsible party like a manager. It is completely within Council’s discretion as to who they want to appear as in the past we have had various representatives on the establishment. Alderman Osborne moved to close the hearing. Alderman Bordeaux withdrew his objection, but stated he prefers the actual applicant to appear. He suspects that the owners of multiple locations do not have all the licenses in their name, but a manager. Alderman Johnson said we need to be consistence and the applicants know in advance. Alderman Thomas said when there are chain restaurants, the manager does not own the business. He is aware of this business which has never had a violation and why would she go to a different location and run it any differently. These alcohol licenses extend meetings and everyone contested. If we going to make the owners of small businesses come before Council, we need to do the same for large corporations. Mayor Jackson said we should review this where the owner and or manager can come forward. Attorney Stillwell said 3 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 there is nothing in the license that requires the applicant to appear. Alderman Johnson asked if Ms. Lowther understood the license was a privilege and not a right and if violated, the license privileges are subject to being revoked Ms. Lowther responded in the affirmative. Hearing closed upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas, seconded by Alderman Johnson it was unanimously approved. Krishna Patel for Shree Ram Enterprises, LLC t/a Skidaway Market, requesting a beer and wine (package) license at 2016 Skidaway Road, which had 2013 liquor, beer and wine (drink) license and is located between 36th and 37th Streets in District 3. Recommend approval. Mr. Patel was present and asked if he understood the license was a privilege and not a right and if violated, the license privileges are subject to being revoked Mr. Patel responded in the affirmative. Alderman Bordeaux asked if the license travels with the applicant if he moves to another City. Attorney Stillwell said if a manager of a Longhorn Steak House moves to another job, then a new manager would be the applicant. You would technically site the manager, but the person really responsible is the owner of the business although the holder of the license would appear in court. Alderman Bordeaux said that is why he is interested is speaking with the applicant. Hearing closed upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried. Alderman Johnson moved to approve the license and it was seconded by Alderman Hall and unanimously carried. Courtney B. Wood for Walgreen Co t/a Walgreens No. 05368, requesting a beer and wine (package) license at 11509 Abercorn Street, which had a 2013 beer and wine (package) license and is located between Largo Drive and Mercy Boulevard in District 6. Recommend approval. Mr. Wood was present and asked if he understood the license was a privilege and not a right and if violated, the license privileges are subject to being revoked Mr. Wood responded in the affirmative. Hearing closed upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried. Approved upon motion of Alderman Thomas, seconded by Alderman Hall and unanimously carried. Alderman Hall asked Mr. Wood when the construction of the Walgreens at Victory Drive and Skidaway will be complete and the business open. Mr. Wood stated that he heard it would be around April 4, 2014. Vinay D. Patel for Indore Enterprises, Inc. t/a Stoggies, requesting a beer and wine (package) license at 802 Montgomery Street, which had a 2003 beer and wine (package) license and is located between Gwinnett and Bolton Streets in District 1. Recommend approval. Mr. Patel was present and asked if he understood the license was a privilege and not a right and if violated, the license privileges are subject to being revoked Mr. Patel responded in the affirmative. Alderman Hall asked for clarification on the establishment not having an alcohol license since 2003. Judee Jones stated it was a typo and should state 2013. Hearing closed upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried. Approved upon motion of Alderman Hall, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS Wireless Telecommunications Facility Appeal. A public hearing on a petition of Terry Thomas, Agent for Vantage Tower Group. LLC, to repeal the denial by the Chatham County- 4 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission of a proposed 120-foot monopole Wireless Telecommunications Facility with internal antennae to be located at 1105 East 57th Street. The appellant is requesting a variance in the required fall zone (from tower height to 20 feet) in that the facility will make use of “breakpoint technology” to remain within the site in the event of failure. The appellant is further requesting a variance to reduce the required landscaping and buffering from a six-foot fence with 15- foot planted buffer to a 10-foot fence with a five-foot planted buffer. The property is zoned PRM-27 (Planned Multifamily -27 units per acre). The application for this facility was denied by the Metropolitan Planning Commission on October 31, 2013. Mayor Jackson asked City Attorney Stillwell to give discussion on this matter. Attorney Stillwell stated this is a very unusual procedure for Council to handle an appeal but it is a unique provision. Jack Butler, MPC is present along with the applicant and attorney. Mr. Butler will be asked question by Attorney Stillwell and Council may also ask questions if necessary. Mayor Jackson asked for it to be entered into the minutes that a stenographer Ms. Annette Pacheco was present in the chambers on behalf of the attorneys representing the company. Attorney Stillwell: Please explain what the applicant applied for, the criteria, what the MPC staff recommended as options to the applicant and what actions were taken. Mr. Butler: In early 2013 an approval process was started for a property located at 1105 East 57th Street. Three (3) public hearings were held before the MPC on August 8, 2013; September 17, 2013; and October 29, 2013 extensive public comment was taken, expert testimony given and staff reports were given at each meeting. On October 29, 2013 MPC took the issue under discussion and voted to deny the request for a new wireless facility. The options at that time were to approve the facility, approve with variances or deny. MPC denied the request based on various witnesses and staff. Attorney Stillwell: MPC denied the petition with both the right to put up the tower and with any variances. Mr. Butler: that is correct. Attorney Stillwell: what is before Council today is an appeal of the decision made by MPC. Council can take any action that chose. They can affirm the denial and deny the petition in whole; they can approve the petition to put up a tower that meets the design criteria of the ordinance but deny some or all variances; or approve the petition as made. Mayor Jackson After the petitioners attorney speaks she will then open the floor for public comment to speak for or against the appeal. Attorney Stillwell: this is not a public hearing and Council under the ordinance is limited items presented to the MPC. Council may elect to request other information at its discretion. Mayor Jackson: It was advertised as a public hearing and wants to give citizens their due diligence. Attorney Tracie Smith, Brennan & Wasden, LLC for Vantage Towers: to remedy a demonstrated gap in AT&T’s coverage area. Requesting Council to grant their application for a 127 foot Wireless Telecommunications Facility with internally mounted antennae on the property located at 1105 East 57th Street. Alderman Bordeaux: asked Attorney Smith does the client have any objections to members of the public coming forward asking questions. Alderman Hall: members of the community have expressed their objection to the tower. The neighborhood is on the rebound and making improvements daily. The towers are continually being put in the poor neighborhoods. He feels and the neighborhoods feel they can find a more suitable place. He’s asking Council to consider the request of the neighborhood and entered two letters into the public record from citizens in opposition of placing the towers in the 5 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 neighborhood. Letter# 1: From: Sean Mannion <mannionsm05@gmail.com> Date: February 19, 2014 at 9:00:50 PM EST To: Alderman John Hall <jhall@savannahga.gov> Subject: [ This EMail May Be Spam ! ] Proposed Cellphone Tower Good Evening Alderman Hall, Thank for allowing me a chance to voice my opinion about the proposed cellphone tower on 57th St. As a resident of Edgemere/Sackville and one that will live mere blocks away from the proposed tower, I am opposed to this tower being built. I do not want to have to look at this thing each day when I leave my house. The neighborhood has made great strides in improving this neighborhood. Unfortunately this tower will reverse those gains. People do not want to look at those towers. They are breeding grounds for pestilence and blight. I do not want to like at something that is so repugnant that the only benefit of it is potential increased cancer risks. Although there are no studies YET linking cell towers to cancer; I do not want to live near one when it is proven. We already know cell phone increase brain cancer. Do not build this tower! The MPC was correct in denying this tower the first time. It is clear the residents do not want this eye sore in our neighborhood, why should some company be able to overrule the will of the people? The telecom companies were DENIED by the residents. Then poured money into the State Legislature to try and get their way. The people triumphed! At what point will the message come across, that the people DO NOT want this? Listen to what the people want. Edgemere/Sackville does not want to look at this repugnant disgusting metal "tower." If the telecom companies are so set on improving their service, maybe they should begin by listening to the people! This act of ignoring the people is disgusting. I urge everyone to vote AGAINST this tower, and support the decision of the MPC. Thank you again for your help Alderman Hall in making sure the voice of the people is heard! Please deny all attempts to put this tower in this neighborhood. We could use the area for a park that ATT and fund if they want to spend money so badly. -Sean Mannion 6 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Letter #2 From: <wwillis12@comcast.net> Date: February 20, 2014 at 12:41:26 PM EST To: <ejackson@savannahga.gov>, <cbell@savannahga.gov>, <tbordeaux@savannahga.gov>, <vjohnson01@savannahga.gov>, <mosborne@savannahga.gov>, <jhall@savannahga.gov>, <msprague@savannahga.gov>, <eshabazz@savannahga.gov>, <tthomas@savannahga.gov>, <scutter@savannahga.gov> Subject: Vantage Tower Group Proposed Tower Located at 1105 E. 57th Street Public Hearing Dear Mayor Jackson and City Council Members, We are unable to attend the City Council Meeting today due to health issues where a public hearing will be held on a petition of Terry Thomas, Agent for Vantage Tower Group, LLC. to repeal the denial by the Chatham County-savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission of the proposed 120-foot monopole Wireless Telecommunication Facility with internal antenna to be located at 1105 East 57th Street. The tower would be located in a residential neighborhood and will decrease our property values plus our quality of life. Since the tower will be located so close to homes including a day care center, we are concerned about possible health issues related to the tower. We own two home in the area. We urge you to uphold the denial of this project. Thank you. Sincerely, Winston J. and Barbara Willis Terry Thomas, Vantage Towers: the diameter of the base of the tower is approximately 5-6 feet and tapers up. It’s a flag pole and all antennae are inside. Alderman Sprague: it’s larger than a flag pole and fairly big. Were other locations looked at such as Hall Park, Daffin Park and other areas. Mr. Thomas: yes those areas were looked at the tower would have to be within the search range, the location proposed is on the south end of the search range. Alderman Shabazz: made it clear to the public that the pictures being shown are photo simulations and are not real. How the site was located and why is that sight the only one available. Attorney Smith: Thanked Alderman Shabazz for pointing out that these were photo simulations and stated these were actually, constructed towers to give the MPC staff the best way as accurately as possible to depict what the tower would look like. The only photo that wasn’t a simulation was the first one shown of the property as it currently is with the building intact. Greg Knight, AT&T: there are no zoning districts in the City of Savannah that excludes towers. There is a large coverage area which covers parts of Edgemere, Parkside, Daffin Park, Ardsley Park, Gould Estates and Ardmore and is a very large coverage hole and can’t be fixed with one tower. Alderman Thomas: what is the selling point for the tower being proposed? 7 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Mr. Thomas, Vantage Towers: they do not build a tower unless they have an anchored tenant with a need to be there. City Scape is the third party consultant being used to ensure there is a need for the work to be done. Alderman Thomas: how many spaces are available on the tower? Mr. Thomas, Vantage Towers: the tower is designed with 5 antennae locations. AT&T would have the top two locations, and three other cell phone carriers could have the other spots, with the mono pine the antennae’s would be spread out. Alderman Thomas: if a cell phone carrier cannot get on the proposed tower would they need to build their own tower. Mr. Thomas, Vantage Towers: that’s the purpose of having a tower that is co-locatable, Vantage builds their towers so other carriers can get on their tower versus building another one. Alderman Thomas: in essence they would have to buy or lease a spot from you. Mr. Thomas, Vantage Towers: towers are built per the City of Savannah’s code to accommodate other carriers. Mayor Jackson: how many towers do you have that are basically in a residential neighborhood? Mr. Thomas, Vantage Towers: There are two that were just approved by MPC on Highland Blvd and another one behind a lift station in the cul-de-sac. Also, on Fort Argyle Road, and Uncle Bob’s Storage Mayor Jackson: Throughout this process the residents in the area have objected to the tower being placed in the neighborhood because they are trying to redevelop the entire community and would not be a good sight for their neighborhood. Knowing this have you tried to negotiate a contrcact in another area such as Memorial. Mr. Thomas, Vantage Towers: the search ring is 1/10th in diameter and in order for the tower to be effective it would need to be within the search ring which is why the site location was chosen. Mayor Jackson: it seems like in trying to do due diligence the company should try harder to work with the residents in the area. The building is horrible but that doesn’t mean putting up a tower to replace it would be what’s best. What is your policy for removal of the equipment in the event of a catastrophic event? Mr. Thomas, Vantage Towers: would have to look back at the code however his understanding is there is a requirement. If the tower is not used it would have to be taken down. In some jurisdictions they would put up a bond to have it removed if necessary. Greg Knight, AT&T: There are third party companies that do extensive drive testing of all carriers in areas. There are multiple carriers that have coverage issues in that area. There are no towers in the area that AT&T isn’t already on. Syreeta Monroe President of Edgemere Neighborhood Association who resides at 1125 East 60th Street. Appeared asking Council to deny the petition approving the cell tower, they feel having a cell tower in the neighborhood would be replacing blight with blight. they feel it would cause property values to decrease. Ms. Monroe and other residents then showed Council their vision of what they would like the neighborhood to look like. Rosa Davis: it has not been made clear the lot is a residential lot which limits the height of the tower to 85 feet. If approved it would be next to an apartment building which has approximately 8 families, each morning and evening that would be the view they would see. Ms. Davis continued stating the petitioner is requesting many things that don’t meet the requirements of the ordinance. 8 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Hearing closed upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Bell and unanimously carried. Approved an 85 foot tower with no variances upon motion of Alderman Hall, seconded by Alderman Sprague and unanimously carried. ZONING HEARINGS Robert McCorkle, Agent for Ameris Bank, Owner (13-005875-ZA), requesting to rezone 1716 Habersham Street and 401 E. 34th Street from TN-2 (Traditional Neighborhood) to TC-1 (Traditional; Commercial-Neighborhood). The Metropolitan Planning Commission (MPC) recommends approval. The TC-1 zoning district will allow greater residential density and a variety of residential, civic and commercial uses that support the redevelopment of the mid-city area. A portion of the subject site (44% of the area) is currently TC-1. Nearby to the north and south (and east on the site) are areas designated as TC-1. The area historically had commercial uses including a dry cleaner, furniture repair store, and plumbing supply company and warehouse on the back portion of the site. Many of the more intense uses allowed under TC-1 as compared to TN-2 require special use approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals, an extra step of review is required for their approval. The site has been blighted for about 30 years according to the petitioner. Existing standards for TC-1 versus TN-2 for height are the same so the scale of the development should be consistent with the surrounding existing development. Alderman Johnson referring to City Manager Cutter stated there is not a recommendation from her on the item. City Manager Cutter stated on that day she left early to meet with the City Attorney. The TC zoning district allows for a wide variety of uses that do not exist today which includes rooming houses and wanted to make sure Council was aware. Alderman Osborne stated she would be reluctant to vote because she doesn’t know what they plan to do. Attorney McCorkle stated he represents the petitioner in this process. The property was bank owned under contract to be sold to a developer who is a residential developer. They have not gone through the site plan development process because they need to know what will happen with the zoning so they can determine what will be able to be placed on the site. The client wants to build a unique residential development on the site. 44% of the site is already zoned TC-1. The site has been vacant for 30 years they are seeking to rezone the property to achieve residential density, from a 16 unit development to a 19 unit development. This project will help to fight the crime issues that have been an issue in the area. Attorney McCorkle has letters of support from the FORM and Blowin Smoke which are both restaurants that believe the change in the zoning classification will bring more business to the area. They are trying to unify the zoning classification in the area, the most important issue is that the zoning use is already on a portion of the site. Mayor Jackson referred to City Manager Cutter and asked if she needs time to make a recommendation on the change. City Manager Cutter replied there was a lengthy discussion at MPC she left a few minutes prior to the vote. The existing zoning allows for commercial civic and residential and she feels the parcel can be developed for such uses but is concerned about exposing the property to other uses. Alderman Osborne asked is current status not permitted to build the buildings described by Attorney McCorkle. 9 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Mr. Lotson, MPC replied the type of use is allowed in the current zoning the petitioner is here because of the density issues with the property. In order to get the extra units he described they would need to rezone the property to get the extra units in terms of density per acre. Alderman Johnson is there another zoning classification that would allow them to do what they are proposing and while helping the City of Savannah maintain the integrity of the neighborhood. Mr. Lotson replied the mid-city district is limited in terms of residential and mixed use districts that are available for use and as Attorney McCorckle has pointed out his client has run the numbers so to speak and figured out how many units they would need in order to make it work financially. Mayor Jackson asked will the units proposed be rental units. Attorney McCorckle replied it will be a multi-family apartment project but will look like the rest of the neighborhood surrounding it. Mayor Jackson stated she’s skeptical of changing the zoning classification because she remembers when the property was initially built and they were supposed to be upscale townhomes which didn’t occur. Attorney McCorckle stated the project can be built either way. If the rezoning isn’t approved if the client still decides to build the project the bottom floor of the three story building on Habersham will be commercial. There is nothing that will keep him from building the project proposed. Alderman Osborne asked under the present zoning classification are you stating the property would have to be developed with commercial on the bottom floor. Attorney McCorckle no, it can be built with just residential with a smaller building on Habersham and less residential. Alderman Sprague asked why the client is not present today or being identified. In terms of the business model for the residential construction will it be for families or individuals? Attorney McCorckle replied the developer is JGG Investments, the individual owner is Jeremy Graves his is mother Marsha Graves a mortgage broker in Savannah who currently lives in Charleston, SC that grew up on Wilmington Island. It can be used either way some of the units will be smaller and less likely to have larger families. They will be 2 and 3 bedrooms and he has no intent to rent them separately. The hearing was closed upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried. Alderman Johnson asked for a recommendation from the City Manager. City Manager Cutter stated she recommends denial of the change. Attorney McCorckle asked if he could meet with the City Manager to discuss the issue. Alderman Johnson stated he appreciates the City Manager’s concern and her role is to advise Council and he will be willing to continue the hearing if she feels in doing so it will give her more clarity on the issue. City Manager Cutter stated she gave her recommendation however, if Council directs her to meet with the petitioner she will but her recommendation stands. The recommendation coming from the City Manager is for denial upon motion of Alderman Osborne, seconded by Alderman Shabazz with the following voting in favor: Mayor Jackson, Aldermen Osborne and Bordeaux and Aldermen Johnson, Shabazz, Hall, Thomas, Bell and Sprague voting against the city manager’s motion. Upon motion of Alderman Hall, seconded by Alderman Osborne and unanimously carried the vote was reconsidered. 10 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 The motion was restated: The recommendation coming from the City Manager is for denial upon motion of Alderman Osborne, seconded by Alderman Shabazz with the following voting in favor: Mayor Jackson, Aldermen Osborne, Bordeaux and Hall; and voting against the City Manager’s recommendation for denial were: Aldermen Johnson, Shabazz, Thomas, Bell and Sprague. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Sprague the recommendation of the MPC was approved as follows: Voting For: Aldermen Johnson, Sprague, Bell, Shabazz and Thomas. Voting against: Mayor Jackson, Aldermen Hall, Osborne and Bordeaux. Ordinance to cover will be drawn up for presentation at the next meeting of Council. Russell Steven Varnadoe, Owner (13-000929-ZA), requesting to rezone 3314 Ogeechee Road from I-L (Light Industrial to B-C (Community Business). MPC recommends approval. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Tri-Centennial Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The B-C zoning classification is characterized in part by commercial and multi-family residential uses which abut collector or arterial streets. The general area is converting from more light industrial uses to commercial uses. The current use of the subject property, an apartment hotel, existed prior to zoning and is a nonconforming use and would remain nonconforming if the requested rezoning is adopted. The proposed zoning would allow for the type of development more in keeping with the immediate surroundings. The current I-L zoning, and the intensity of uses which are allowed therein, are inappropriate for this location. Recommend continuing the hearing to March 5, 2014. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Sprague the recommendation of the City Manager to continue until March 5, 2014 was unanimously approved. Metropolitan Planning Commission (13-006337-ZA), recommending to rezone 3320 Ogeechee Road, 1930 Mills B Lane Boulevard, 1934 Mills B Lane Boulevard, 1940 Mills B Lane Boulevard, and 1944 Mills B Lane Boulevard from I-L (Light Industrial) to B-C (Community Business). The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Tri-Centennial Comprehensive Future Land Use Map. The B-C zoning classification is characterized in part by commercial uses which abut collector or arterial streets. The general area is converting from more light industrial uses to commercial uses. The current uses on the subject properties are more appropriate in a commercial zoning district as opposed to the existing industrial district. The current I-L zoning, and the intensity of uses which are allowed therein, are inappropriate for these locations. Recommend continuing the hearing to March 5, 2014. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Sprague the recommendation of the City Manager to continue until March 5, 2014 was unanimously approved. PETITIONS Patrick Shay of Gunn, Meyerhoff, Shay Architects, representing G.P. Capital LLC (Property Owner) – Petition 120895, requesting that the City allow encroachment within the Alice Street right-of-way for the construction of five (5) entry stoops and building pilasters. The subject property is located within the 300 block of Alice Street; more specifically on the south side of Alice between Montgomery and Jefferson Streets. The property owner plans to develop 11 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 the existing vacant lot into five new townhomes, each with a separate entry. The stoops are designed to project 4’-5” over the property line leaving 4’-0” of passable sidewalk before abutting the tree lawn. The request also includes the proposed installation of building pilasters which are part of the front façade, visually separating the townhomes. These pilasters are designed to project 4” over the property line. Recommend approval is subject to the property owner assuming all responsibility for injuries or damages to third parties as a result of the encroaching items. The City will be held harmless for maintenance and liability of the proposed encroaching items. All City permitting and construction guidelines must be followed, and all improvements/additions/modifications to the sidewalk must meet the latest ADA standards. Patrick Shay through Petition 120895, the property owner should be advised that such encroachment grants no ownership rights to the property and that, if ever required, the encroaching item(s) must be removed at the property owner’s expense upon request of the City. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas this recommendation of the City Manager was unanimously approved. Rebecca Lynch of Lynch Associates Architects, representing Josh and Libbie Summers (Property Owners) – Petition 140022, requesting that the City allow encroachment within the E. Harris Street right-of-way for the construction of an entry stoop and brick walkway. The subject property is addressed as 546 E. Harris Street; more specifically, the north side of E. Harris Street between Price and E. Broad Streets. The property owners are planning the construction of a new residence, in which the entry stoop partially crosses the front property line with a brick walkway connecting to the sidewalk. The petitioner notes that the neighborhood has a historical development pattern of residences with projecting stoops, and that this specific design is smaller in nature than the stoop built on the adjacent residence. The petitioner has already received approval of the design for the stoop through the Historic District Board of Review. Recommend approval is subject to the property owner assuming all responsibility for injuries or damages to third parties as a result of the encroaching items. The City will be held harmless for maintenance and liability of the proposed encroaching items. All City permitting and construction guidelines must be followed, and all improvements/additions/modifications to the sidewalk must be done in accordance with City standards and must meet the latest ADA and Life Safety requirements. Rebecca Lynch through Petition 140022, subject to the conditions stated above. The property owner should be advised that such encroachment grants no ownership rights to the property and that, if ever required, the encroaching item(s) must be removed at the property owner’s expense upon request of the City. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas this recommendation of the City Manager was unanimously approved. Angela Bean of Doug Bean Signs, representing Staybridge Suites (Business/Tenant) and Savannah Hospitality Properties LLC (Property Owner) – Petition 140038, requesting that the City allow encroachment within the E. Bay Street and Lincoln Street right-of-ways for the installation of principal use signs over the sidewalks. The subject property is located at 301 E. Bay Street; more specifically on the south side of E. Bay Street at Lincoln Street. The signs (2 totals) are designed as approximately 54” wide x 20” high, supported by metal brackets. The overall projection from the building façade is 5’-9” and will provide approximately 12’-0” of vertical clearance above the sidewalk. 12 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Recommend approval is subject to the property owner assuming all responsibility for injuries or damages to third parties as a result of the encroaching items. The City will be held harmless for maintenance and liability of the proposed encroaching items. All City permitting and construction guidelines must be followed. Angela Bean through Petition 140038, subject to the conditions stated above. The property owner should be advised that such encroachment grants no ownership rights to the property and that, if ever required, the encroaching item(s) must be removed at the property owner’s expense upon request of the Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas this recommendation of the City Manager was unanimously approved. Josh Beckler of Coastal Canvas, representing Spudnik (Tenant/Business Owner) and Cohen Family LP (Property Owner) – Petition 140039, requesting that the City allow encroachment within the W. Broughton Street right-of-way for the installation of an awning over the sidewalk. The subject property is located at 416 W. Broughton Street; more specifically on the north side of Broughton between Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard and Montgomery Street. The awning as designed is approximately 12’-0” wide x 3’-6” high with a projection of 5’-0” and vertical clearance of 8’-0”. The awning will be replacing an existing awning at the building façade. Recommend Approval is subject to the property owner assuming all responsibility for injuries or damages to third parties as a result of the encroachment. The City will be held harmless for maintenance and liability of the proposed awning. All City permitting and construction guidelines must be followed. Josh Beckler through Petition 140039, subject to the conditions stated above. The property owner should be advised that such encroachment grants no ownership rights to the property and that, if ever required, the encroaching awning must be removed at the petitioner or property owner’s expense upon request of the City. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas this recommendation of the City Manager was unanimously approved. Angela Bean of Doug Bean Signs, representing Hue Luxury Student Living (Business/Tenant) and Rehabilitation Development Inc. (Property Owner) – Petition 140044, requesting that the City allow encroachment within the Drayton Street right-of-way for the installation of signs over the sidewalk. The subject property is located at 412 Drayton Street; more specifically on the east side of Drayton between Oglethorpe Avenue and Hull Street. The request includes the installation of two (2) signs on the building’s façade. Each sign is approximately 3’-0” high x 6’-0” wide, with 10’-2” of vertical clearance above the sidewalk, hung from metal brackets. Recommend approval is subject to the property owner assuming all responsibility for injuries or damages to third parties as a result of the encroaching items. The City will be held harmless for maintenance and liability of the proposed encroaching items. All City permitting and construction guidelines must be followed. Angela Bean through Petition 140044, subject to the conditions stated above. The property owner should be advised that such encroachment grants no ownership rights to the property and that, if ever required, the encroaching item(s) must be removed at the property owner’s expense upon request of the City. (An aerial map and photo are attached.) Recommend approval. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas this recommendation of the City Manager was unanimously approved. 13 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 ORDINANCES SECOND READINGS Parking Restrictions on East and West Sides of Abercorn Street. An ordinance to amend the City Code to prohibit parking along the east side of Abercorn Street from 25 feet north of E. Hall Lane and extending southward to E. Gwinnett Street; along the east side of Abercorn Street from E. Gwinnett Street extending southward for 175 feet to E. Gwinnett Lane; along the west side of Abercorn Street from a point beginning 45 feet north of E. Gwinnett Street and extending northward for 170 feet; and along the west side of Abercorn Street from 30 feet south of E. Gwinnett Street extending southward for 140 feet. (The Traffic Engineering Report was approved January 23, 2014.) Recommend approval. Alderman Osborne asked Mike Weiner, Traffic Engineer to come forward to explain the pros and cons of a four way stop. Mr. Weiner stated the biggest issue is the physical layout of the intersection. It was recommended that Mr. Weiner and staff meet with the residents in the neighborhood to give them an opportunity to better understand why the changes are necessary. Upon motion of Alderman Johnson, seconded by Alderman Thomas and unanimously carried this was continued until the meeting of March 20, 2014. MISCELLANEOUS Reschedule the City Council Meeting of March 6, 2014. Reschedule the City Council meeting of March 6, 2014 to Wednesday, March 5, 2014, to allow Council to attend the Savannah- Chatham Day in Atlanta on March 6, 2014. Approved upon motion of Alderman Thomas, seconded by Alderman Johnson and unanimously carried. First Reading of Downtown Savannah Authority Application on behalf of the City of Savannah. The City of Savannah has requested the assistance of the Downtown Savannah Authority by the issuance of bonds to re-finance certain maturities of the Downtown Savannah Authority (Georgia) Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds (City of Savannah Project) Taxable- Build America Bonds – Direct Payment, Series 2009B at lower interest rates to achieve debt service savings for the City. The City will enter into a contract with the DSA under which it will pledge to pay all interest and principal for the bonds. As required by state statue, the Authority in turn has made application to the City requesting the City Council’s express approval for the issuance of such bonds. The approximate amount of the new bond issue is $10 million. Under state statue, the Authority’s application to the City to issue such bonds must receive two readings before City Council. The first reading is scheduled for the meeting of February 20, 2014. The second reading has been advertised for the meeting of March 5, 2014. Parks and Recreation Services Master Plan and Mission Statement. Recommend approval of the Parks and Recreation Services Master Plan and Mission Statement as presented to City 14 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 Council. The Master Plan serves as a guide for the formulation of local policy and supports the decision making process to address both the quality and locations of recreational facilities to meet the present and future needs of Savannah. Recommend approval. Upon motion of Alderman Thomas, seconded by Alderman Hall, the recommendation of the City Manager was approved. Upon motion of Alderman Thomas, seconded by Alderman Bell, and unanimously carried approval was given to the City Attorney’s recommendation to settle the Hall case. BIDS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS Upon motion of Alderman Thomas, seconded by Alderman Hall and unanimously carried, the following bids, contracts and agreements were approved. Water Meters – Annual Contract – Event No. 1884. Recommend approval to award an annual contract for water meters to Badger Meter in the amount of $575,153.00, Neptune Technology Group in the amount of $74,650.00, Consolidated Pipe & Supply in the amount of $69,129.00, HD Supply in the amount of $18,480.00 and to Mueller Systems in the amount of $16,000.00 for a grand total of $753,412.00. The water meters will be used by Water Distribution to replace meters that are no longer functioning and to install for new service. These meters are maintained in inventory at the Central Warehouse. Bids were received January 7, 2014. This bid was advertised, opened and reviewed. Delivery: As Needed. Terms: Net 30 Days, 2%-30/Net 31 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Water Distribution/Construction Supplies & Materials (Account No. 521-2503-51340). Operating Agreement for Tricentennial Park. Recommend authorization for the City Manager to execute an “Operating Agreement” between the City of Savannah and the Coastal Heritage Society (CHS) for the operation and use of City-owned property referred to as the Tricentennial Park and located at 301-303 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, 655 Louisville Road, 650 W. Jones Street and 604 W. Jones Street. The agreement outlines responsibilities of CHS to include daily janitorial, grounds keeping, maintenance, utility and professional accounting/administrative services for this City-owned resource. The agreement also articulates CHS’s role in maintaining records, reports and meetings, operating policies and procedures, financial policies and procedures and responsibilities of the City for compliance monitoring and dispensing of funding in the amount of $716,528. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Interdepartmental Contribution to Coastal Heritage Society (Account No. 101- 8124-51860). Recommend approval. Tree and Stump Removal – Annual Contract Renewal – Event No. 1894. Recommend approval to renew an annual contract for tree and stump removal to Bartlett Tree Experts and McKinnon, Inc. in the estimated amount of $100,000.00. The services include the removal of trees and grinding of stumps. Bidders were pre-qualified based upon the following criteria: company qualifications and experience, a certified arborist on staff, references, proper insurance and necessary equipment. The two qualified bidders will provide quotations for a pre- determined list of work to be accomplished on a weekly basis and will be awarded that specific 15 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 list of work based on the lowest quote submitted. This is the first of two renewal options available. This proposal was advertised, opened and reviewed. Delivery: As Needed. Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, General Fund/Park & Tree/Other Contractual Service (Account No. 101-6122-51295 Aerial Apparatus – Event No. 1955. Recommend approval to procure two aerial apparatus trucks from Sutphen Corporation in the amount of $2,298,732.00. The first aerial apparatus will be used by Savannah Fire and Emergency Services to replace unit 8507 which is no longer economical to operate or repair. The second unit is a fleet addition to support the updated fire response standards, and will be located at the Bradley Point Fire Station when it is completed. The bid was advertised, opened and reviewed. Delivery: December, 2014 (replacement) and January, 2015 (fleet addition). Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 budget and included in the 2014-2018 CIP plan, Vehicle Purchases/Vehicular Equipment (Account No. 613- 9230- 51515). Refuse Truck Chassis – Sole Source – Event No. 2033. Recommend approval to procure nine refuse truck chassis from Crane Carrier Company in the amount of $1,337,598.00. The chassis will be utilized by Sanitation to replace units currently assigned to Residential Refuse and Recycling. These units are no longer economical to repair or operate. A bid was negotiated on January 8, 2014. Delivery: 120-150 Days. Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Vehicle Replacement Fund/Vehicle Purchases/Vehicular Equipment (Account No. 613-9230-51515). Swimming Pool Chemicals – Annual Contract Renewal – Event No. 2050. Recommend approval to renew an annual contract to procure swimming pool chemicals from Savannah Brush & Chemical, Inc. in the amount of $27,063.00 and Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. in the amount of $18,735.25 for a total of $45,798.25. The swimming pool chemicals will be utilized by the Buildings and Grounds Department for use in various city-owned swimming pools. The low bid for each item was selected for the award. Pride Pools, Spas & Leisure withdrew their bid due to errors in submitting their prices. This is the first of two renewal options available. Bids were originally received on December 21, 2012. This bid was advertised, opened and reviewed. Delivery: As Requested. Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Buildings and Grounds/Chemicals (Account No. 101-6120-51323). A Pre-Bid Conference was not conducted as this is an annual contract renewal. (B)Indicates local, non-minority owned business. (D)Indicates non-local, non-minority owned business. Recommend approval. Backhoes – Sole Source – Event No. 2054. Recommend approval to procure four backhoes from Low Country Machinery d/b/a JCB of Georgia in the amount of $229,845.00. The backhoes will be utilized by the Water Distribution, Cemeteries, and Stormwater Departments to replace units which are no longer economical to repair. JCB of Georgia will hold pricing from Event No. 1709 that was approved by City Council on October 31, 2013. The bid was advertised, opened and reviewed. Delivery: March 10, 2014. Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Vehicle Purchases/Vehicular Equipment (Account No. 613-9230-51515). Crushed Stone – Annual Contract Renewal – Event No. 2055. Recommend approval to renew an annual contract for crushed stone from Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. in the amount of 16 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 $175,965.00. The contract will be utilized by Streets Maintenance and other various departments to procure crushed stone for various unpaved streets and other locations throughout the City of Savannah. This is the first of four renewal options available. Bids were originally received January 29, 2013. Delivery: As Requested. Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Streets Maintenance/Other Contractual Service/Construction Supplies & Materials (Account No. 101- 2105-51295 and 101-2105-51340). Guardrail Repair and Installation – Annual Contract Renewal – Event No. 2056. Recommend approval to renew an annual contract for guardrail repair and installation with Savannah River Utilities (Primary) and Leon's Fence & Guardrail (Secondary) in the amount of $81,100.00. The contract will be utilized by Street Maintenance to repair and install guardrails in various locations across the city. This is the first of two renewal options available. Bids were originally received January 29, 2013. Delivery: As Requested. Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Street Maintenance/Other Contractual Service/Construction Supplies & Materials (Account No. 101- 2105-51295 and 101-2105-51340). Office Supplies – Annual Contract Renewal – Event No. 2057. Recommend renewing an annual contract for office supplies to Staples Advantage in the estimated amount of $476,625.48. The contract will be used by City staff to procure office supplies, small office equipment and various small furniture items. Staples offers the City a 2% rebate on all orders placed as well as a large order rebate of $6 per order to departments placing orders of $200 or more. The City received $9,024.83 for the rebate and $5,268 in large order rebates in 2013. They also partner with the City to negotiate directly with the manufacturer of the most ordered toner cartridges for deeper discounts and rebates. This is the third of four renewal options available. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Various Office Supplies (Account No. 51306). Rear Loader Refuse Bodies – Event No. 2068. Recommend approval to procure eight rear loader refuse bodies from Consolidated Disposal in the amount of $571,224.00. The rear loader refuse bodies will be utilized by the Residential Refuse and Recycling Departments to replace units that are no longer economical to operate or repair. Consolidated Disposal will hold pricing from Event 1262, which was approved by Council on April 8, 2013. Bids were originally received on April 2, 2013. This bid was advertised, opened and reviewed. Delivery: June 1, 2014. Terms: Net 30 Days. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Vehicle Purchases/Vehicular Equipment (Account No. 613-9230-51515). Network Maintenance, Support and Managed Services – Event No. 2080. Recommend approval to procure network maintenance, support, and managed services from Layer 3 in the amount of $235,018.33. The agreement will provide maintenance and support of the City's network equipment, as well as monitoring services for critical network equipment and functions. The equipment covered under this maintenance includes Juniper Networks (Data Center equipment, network switches); Aruba Networks (wireless and mesh equipment); Palo Alto Networks (firewall services) and F5 Networks (system load balancing). In previous years each of these maintenance contracts were awarded separately with differing contract periods. The City has negotiated a single, coterminous maintenance contract that allows for efficient management of these services. Included in this agreement are technical support services for supplemental monitoring and reporting for these critical network components that will facilitate proactive response to issues or problems with equipment in the Information Technology (IT) Data Center. 17 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 The reason for the sole source is due to the vendor’s extensive knowledge of the City’s network as the City has contracted with this vendor since 2006 establishing and expanding the IT data network. As a result, the vendor is uniquely skilled at troubleshooting and supporting the data network and its expertise and knowledge of the City's system architecture is essential for ongoing support. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, Internal Service Fund/Information Technology/Data Processing Equipment Maintenance (Account No. 611- 1140-41251). Floodplain Mitigation Plan – Event No. 1824. Recommend approval to procure a floodplain mitigation plan from AMEC Environmental and Infrastructure, Inc. in the amount of $49,500.00. Later this year the City will need to submit a revised Floodplain Management Plan (FMP) that is required for participation in FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS). The FMP is a critical element of the CRS, which is used to set National Flood Insurance premium discount rates for City Residents. The CRS is a point system program that awards insurance premium discounts to communities that are aggressive in flood mitigation activities. The City currently carries a rating of 6 which provides a 20% discount of the NFIP insurance premiums paid by City residents, property owners, and business owners in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and 10% for policies outside the SFHA. Failure to produce the FMP and at least one accompanying element will result in loss of this discount. Proposals were received December 3, 2013. This proposal was advertised, opened, and reviewed. Funds are available in the 2014 Budget, General Fund/Development Services/Other Contractual Services (Account No. 101-2131-51295). Contract Offer from the Georgia Department of Transportation – Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport. The Savannah Airport commission requests approval of a contract offer from the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) in the amount of $71,892.00 for the Runway 1 Perimeter Road, Runway 10-28 Safety Area Improvements, and Add Two AOA Gates project. This represents 5.0% funding of the project. The Federal share is 90% and the GDOT typically pays half of the Airport Commission’s 10% share. Lightning Detection System from Earth Networks in the Amount of $26,000.00 – Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport. The Savannah Airport Commission requests approval of a Lightning Detection System from Earth Networks in the amount of $26,000.00. Lightning strikes are particularly hazardous to ramp operations, and ramp workers need to cease outdoor activities when lighting presents an imminent danger. The resulting delays from ramp closures affect both the passengers and the airlines. The installation of a Lighting Detection System will improve ramp worker safety and minimize the number and duration of ramp closures. The Lighting Detection System consists of the installation of a new Lightning Sensor System, Outdoor Alerting System, Indoor Alerting System, and a New Weather Station. This is a sole source purchase because the Earth Network system uses a proprietary system of networked weather stations to provide real-time and highly dense lightning and weather information. The Earth Network system is also the only system which integrates both Lightning Detection and Weather Monitoring into one system in order to provide a complete picture of current weather conditions. Towing of Abandoned Vehicles – Annual Contract Renewal – Event No. 2085. Recommend approval to renew an annual contract for towing of abandoned vehicles to S & S Towing, Inc. in the estimated revenue amount of $87,230.00. The contract is utilized by Property Maintenance 18 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SAVANNAH CITY COUNCIL MEETING – February 20, 2014 for the removal and storage of abandoned and derelict vehicles. The contract is also used by Parking Services to remove booted and illegally parked vehicles. This contract provides revenue to the City. The towing companies pay the City a flat fee for each vehicle towed and stored and receives compensation from the owner or through sale of the vehicles. This is the last renewal option available. Bids were originally received May 17, 2011. This bid was advertised, opened and reviewed. Delivery: As Required. Terms: Net 30 Days. No funding is required as this is a revenue-generating contract. A Pre-Bid Conference was not conducted as this is an annual contract renewal. (B)Indicates local, non-minority owned business; (E) Indicates local, woman owned business. Recommend approval. Approved upon motion of Alderman Thomas, seconded by Alderman Osborne and unanimously carried. The following announcements were made: Alderman Bell announced that “Ask and Aldermen” next Monday, February 24, 2014 at Jonesville Baptist Church 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., in the 5th district with Alderman Shabazz. Alderman Sprague stated “Muffins with Mary Ellen” at Coffee Dot Deli is also scheduled for next week. Alderman Johnson said if you see red the City it is not on fire, but members of the Delta Sigma Theta. Mayor Jackson added that over 12,000 will be in Savannah, spending money and staying at least one or two nights. There being no further business, Mayor Jackson declared this meeting of Council adjourned. Dyanne C. Reese, MMC, Clerk of Council 19