Planning Commission
Regular MeetingSunnyvale, CA · October 12, 2020
Minutes
City of Sunnyvale
Meeting Minutes - Final
Planning Commission
Monday, October 12, 2020 7:00 PM Telepresence Meeting: City Web Stream |
Comcast Channel 15
Special Meeting - Study Session - Canceled | Public Hearing - 7:00 PM
TELECONFERENCE NOTICE
STUDY SESSION CANCELED
7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Howard called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM via teleconference.
ROLL CALL
Present: 7 - Chair Daniel Howard
Vice Chair David Simons
Commissioner Sue Harrison
Commissioner John Howe
Commissioner Ken Olevson
Commissioner Ken Rheaume
Commissioner Carol Weiss
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
CONSENT CALENDAR
Commissioner Howe confirmed with Assistant Director Andrew Miner that the
October 26, 2020 agenda is not excessively full.
MOTION: Commissioner Howe moved and Chair Howard seconded the motion to
approve the Consent Calendar.
The motion carried by the following vote:
City of Sunnyvale Page 1
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
Yes: 5 - Chair Howard
Vice Chair Simons
Commissioner Howe
Commissioner Olevson
Commissioner Rheaume
No: 0
Abstained: 2 - Commissioner Harrison
Commissioner Weiss
Commissioner Weiss and Commissioner Harrison abstained for Agenda Item 1.A
only.
1.A 20-0878 Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September 28, 2020
1.B 20-0880 REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 26, 2020
Proposed Project: General Plan Amendment Initiation request to
consider amending the General Plan designation from Commercial to
Low Density Residential for the northwest portion of the site.
Location: 1689 S. Wolfe Road (APN: 309-51-028)
File #: 2020-7436
Zoning: C-1 (Neighborhood Business)/PD (Planned Development)
General Plan: Commercial
Applicant / Owner: PSR Development Inc. (applicant and owner)
Environmental Review: The project is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15378(a).
Project Planner: Kelly Cha, (408) 730-7408, kcha@sunnyvale.ca.gov
PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS
2. 20-0877 Proposed Project: Related applications on a 0.3-acre site:
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: to demolish the existing
buildings and construct a new 141,333 square foot seven (7) story
office building with four (4) levels of underground parking, an
adjustment to the required parking.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: to make adjustments to the existing
parcel boundary, street easement dedication and vacation and
new utility and architectural easements.
Location: 100 Altair Way (APN:209-07-007)
File #: 2016-7438
Zoning: DSP Block 1
City of Sunnyvale Page 2
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
Applicant / Owner: Daniel Minkoff, Minkoff Group (applicant/owner)
Environmental Review: No additional review required as per CEQA
Guidelines 15168(c)(2) and (4) - environmental impacts of the project
are addressed in the Downtown Specific Plan Program Environmental
Impact Report (EIR)(State Clearinghouse #2018052020).
Project Planner: Shaunn Mendrin, (408) 730-7431,
smendrin@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Principal Planner Shaunn Mendrin shared the staff report with a slide presentation.
Commissioner Weiss asked if the glass guardrail on the roof would meet the Bird
Safe Building Design Guidelines. Daniel Minkoff, representing applicant The Minkoff
Group, responded that the guardrail glass would be fritted as recommended by their
bird safe consultant.
Commissioner Howe asked if the proposed project meets the spirit and general
letter of the Development Agreement and what decision body will have final review
of the proposed project. Principal Planner Mendrin stated that the Commission will
make the final decision unless the proposed project is appealed or the City Council
decides to review it. He added that the proposed project’s design and intent has
been clear and consistent from conception and throughout discussions regarding
the Development Agreement and outreach for the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP)
Amendment.
Commissioner Olevson suggested that Attachment 2, Project Data Table be revised
so that the compact parking spaces line indicates that it is an adjustment to
Sunnyvale Municipal Code parking requirements and that Recommended Condition
of Approval PS-1 be revised to read that the final exterior building materials and
color schemes are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community
Development. Commissioner Olevson asked why the developer would be required
to help improve intersections as far away as five miles from the property. Principal
Planner Mendrin and Assistant Director Andrew Miner stated that those particular
recommended conditions of approval are mitigation measures that came directly
from the DSP Environmental Impact Report. Commissioner Olevson confirmed with
Principal Planner Mendrin that the Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
Program can be modified if, for example, a tenant happened to operate outside of
normal business hours and that there are methods for determining if the existing
Program remains adequate. Commissioner Olevson asked if ACE’s valet parking
analysis and recommendations have been validated as he believes parking garage
users would experience significantly longer wait times for valet attendants. Chrissy
Mancini Nichols with Walker Consultants stated that she and her firm found the
City of Sunnyvale Page 3
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
study accurate and the proposed valet system adequate to provide a high level of
service for users, noting ACE’s proposed use of technology and staggered parking
to reduce wait times. Assistant Director Miner clarified that the City hired Walker
Consultants to review the applicant’s TDM Program.
Commissioner Harrison asked how the Community Benefit funds collected might be
used. Assistant Director Miner and Senior Assistant City Attorney Rebecca Moon
stated that the use has not yet been determined and the funds can be used at the
City Manager’s discretion in any part of the city.
Commissioner Rheaume confirmed with Principal Planner Mendrin that the
proposed project would be seven stories, one story taller than the office building
across the street from the proposed development. Commissioner Rheaume stated
that he will ask the applicant for examples of successful living walls in the area and
how they intend to maintain theirs. Assistant Director Miner stated that the living wall
part of the first Moffett Towers project is a great example of one that was well
designed and has been beautifully maintained.
Vice Chair Simons asked how the louvers along the east side of the building would
move throughout the day and stated the importance of an unobstructed view of the
park from the east from inside the building. Assistant Director Miner and Principal
Planner Mendrin clarified that the louvers are stationary. Vice Chair Simons asked
about the ramp grade near the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking spaces
to ensure that those using the parking spaces would be able to maneuver about the
parking garage. Principal Planner Mendrin responded that the ADA parking spaces
would be located on a parking level adjacent to a hallway that leads directly to the
elevator lobby. Vice Chair Simons commented that living walls are difficult to
maintain and asked if there is a recommended condition of approval that requires it
to be maintained. Assistant Director Miner stated that it is possible to add a
condition of approval specifying the living wall’s appearance and required
maintenance. Vice Chair Simons asked how different TDM Programs work together
and if TDM Program consultants coordinate when providing recommendations for
different developments in the same area. Principal Planner Mendrin stated that City
Council approved the downtown parking study prepared by Walker Consultants that
recommended the formation of a transportation management agency that would
coordinate the different TDM Programs for downtown developments. Vice Chair
Simons confirmed with Principal Planner Mendrin that this development would
eventually participate in the transportation management agency when it is formed
which is required with Recommended Condition of Approval GC-9.
City of Sunnyvale Page 4
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
Chair Howard opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Minkoff; Rob Zirkle, Principal with Brick; and Rene Bihan, Principal with SWA
Group, shared information about the proposed project with a slide presentation.
Commissioner Weiss asked how the office building would help enliven Plaza del
Sol, particularly after business hours and on the weekend. Mr. Zirkle answered that
the building would house 600 to 900 employees which would increase foot traffic in
the park, support nearby retail, and see people moving through the park by way of
the directional pedestrian paving. Mr. Bihan responded that the strong interior and
exterior design relationship and increased safety, foot traffic, and pedestrian
destinations would contribute to the park’s vitality, adding that the building would
mostly likely be active in the evenings and the park could become a neighborhood
amenity on the weekends. Commissioner Weiss confirmed with Mr. Zirkle that the
underground parking garage entry and exit ramp would be designed to the highest
safety level to protect drivers traveling in and out of the garage. Commissioner
Weiss also asked if in the event of a power loss, the emergency generator would
power the elevators and ensure that the valet system would continue to operate. Mr.
Zirkle responded that the emergency generator would run all the fire and life safety
systems including the elevators and that there would be no physical barriers created
in the event of an emergency that would prevent cars from exiting the parking
garage.
Commissioner Howe confirmed with Commissioner Olevson his previously
suggested revisions to the Project Data Table in Attachment 2 and Recommended
Condition of Approval PS-1. Commissioner Howe confirmed with Assistant Director
Miner the possibility of a condition of approval that specifies the expectations for the
living wall’s appearance and required maintenance. Commissioner Howe then
asked the applicant about any issues if the Commission were to make the three
items conditions of approval. Mr. Minkoff stated that they would be amenable and
added that they have experience successfully installing and maintaining living walls.
Commissioner Harrison asked how the inset windows on the south façade provide
privacy. Mr. Zirkle explained that the windows are small because the building is built
to the property line, no more than five percent of that facade can be glass, the
windows are inset three feet with a beveled edge on one side, and are placed
randomly along that facade. He added that they would work with the neighboring
properties to ensure that their privacy issues are addressed.
City of Sunnyvale Page 5
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
Vice Chair Simons asked the applicant to confirm if the type and number of tenants
determine when the lobby would be lit and open. Mr. Minkoff stated that the lobby is
intended to be adaptable based on needs, the building would have an operable
window and door system at the corner of Taaffe Street and Altair Way that could
close to provide added security, and that the lobby amenities have not yet been
determined. Vice Chair Simons asked if the lobby would be open and accessible for
anyone on Plaza del Sol needing to call for help late at night. Mr. Minkoff answered
that they are open to working with the City to locate an emergency call feature near
the building if the City installs a security system for Plaza del Sol. Vice Chair Simons
confirmed with Mr. Zirkle that the louvers on the eastern and western facades would
be fixed in place. Mr. Zirkle discussed the louvers’ specifications and the park view
from the interior of the building on the eastern side. Vice Chair Simons asked if the
glass fiber reinforced wall panels would look like concrete. Mr. Zirkle explained that
the material is an upgrade from concrete in that there can be variation in color, tone,
and materiality which makes it appear like granite if looking at it up close and
smoother when viewing it from farther away. Vice Chair Simons stated that the
southern facade reminds him of Brutalist architecture and noted his concern that it
appears stark, adding that other modern buildings with uniform concrete looks have
added texture and tiles for more visual interest. Mr. Zirkle responded that only the
southern elevation, 15-20% of the entire surface area of the building, would consist
of the concrete-like material.
Chair Howard appreciated the different aesthetics that the contrasting facades
provide and asked if it is possible to modify the angle of the louvers to maximize the
park view while maintaining the building’s energy efficiency. Mr. Zirkle stated that
they can explore a different angle but noted that it may be difficult to achieve without
reducing the depth of the louvers to ensure a strong connection to the mullions
which might then reduce the building’s energy efficiency. Chair Howard confirmed
with Assistant Director Miner that without a condition of approval, the Commission
could direct staff and the applicant to work together to explore a different angle for
the louvers with staff’s final approval.
Michael Johnson, Executive Director of the Sunnyvale Downtown Association and
Business Improvement District, spoke in support of the proposed project.
Mr. Zirkle presented additional images and information about the proposed project.
Chair Howard closed the Public Hearing.
City of Sunnyvale Page 6
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
Vice Chair Simons confirmed with Assistant Director Miner that staff would work with
other City departments to determine the best placement for a security mechanism,
such as a pole with an emergency call light/button. Vice Chair Simons and Assistant
Director Miner discussed language for a possible condition that would secure the
living wall’s installation and maintenance and agreed that any major changes to the
property after it’s built, such as drastic alterations on the pedestrian level, could
return to the Commission for review. Vice Chair Simons added that the proposed
18-inch louvers do not obstruct an eastern park view from the interior of the building
as much as he had expected. Assistant Director Miner asked Vice Chair Simons
about his and the Commission’s interest in a possible condition that requires an
open look and feel to the lobby as depicted in the renderings. Vice Chair Simons
commented that he would like to discuss minimum lobby hours with the Commission.
Chair Howard opened the Public Hearing for the applicant to respond to the idea of
minimum lobby hours.
Mr. Minkoff responded that the building would be adaptable, and it is their intention
to keep the lobby open as much as possible, but minimum lobby hours would be a
burdensome requirement without knowing the tenants and their security needs.
Commissioner Harrison asked staff if installing security systems such as poles with
an emergency call light/button is a standard requirement that can be asked of
applicants with office building developments. Assistant Director Miner responded
that it is not a standard requirement. Senior Assistant City Attorney Moon discussed
the minimum lobby hours issue and Mr. Minkoff added that the approved
Development Agreement does not require any public improvements in the building’s
interior and the Public Art would only be on the building’s exterior.
Commissioner Harrison restated her question about the Commission’s authority to
require an applicant to install a security mechanism. Vice Chair Simons stated that
the security equipment is important as Plaza del Sol could become a safety issue
without it. He added that the other nearby office buildings do not have security
notification equipment because they were built before the park. Mr. Minkoff stated
that he is open to the opportunity to work with the City to locate part of a security
network near the building. Senior Assistant City Attorney Moon stated that issues
outside of land use, architecture, and design elements are subject to debate as they
are not normally issues the Commission considers.
City of Sunnyvale Page 7
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
Assistant Director Miner clarified that the possible condition could address the look
and feel of the lobby to ensure it is consistent with the renderings and explained that
the intention is not to guarantee public access to the building. Mr. Minkoff stated
that they are amenable to a condition that requires the installation and maintenance
of clear glass in the lobby windows to allow the ground floor lobby to be visible from
the outside.
Commissioner Olevson stated his belief that deviating from the approved
Development Agreement and requiring the applicant to be responsible for the
public’s safety in the surrounding area would be straying outside of the
Commission’s purview. He stated his preference that the Commission focus on the
structure itself and entrust staff to present any major changes to the Commission if
any arise after a decision is made.
Vice Chair Simons agreed that any requirements should be limited to the building’s
footprint and voiced support for an emergency call light/button located on the
outside of the building.
Chair Howard closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION: Commissioner Howe moved and Commissioner Rheaume seconded the
motion for Alternative 2 - Make the required Findings required to approve the CEQA
determination that the project is consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan's
Program Environmental Impact Report and no additional environmental review is
required, and approve the Special Development Permit and Tentative Parcel Map
based on Findings in Attachment 3 and Recommended Conditions of Approval in
Attachment 4 subject to modified Conditions of Approval.
The modifications are as follows:
1. Label the compact parking spaces line of the Project Data Table, Attachment 2 as
an adjustment to Sunnyvale Municipal Code parking requirements.
2. Revise Attachment 4, Recommended Condition of Approval PS-1 to read as
follows:
Exterior Materials Review:
Final exterior building materials and color scheme are subject to review and
approval by the Director of Community Development prior to submittal of a building
City of Sunnyvale Page 8
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
permit. [COA] [PLANNING]
3. Add the following language to Attachment 4, Recommended Condition of
Approval GC-1:
The living wall along Altair Way and in the lobby must be installed and maintained in
accordance with the approved plans presented to the Planning Commission on
October 12, 2020.
4. Specify that the applicant must work with the City in good faith if the City decides
to explore installing a security system for Plaza del Sol, such as polls with an
emergency call light/button.
5. Specify that staff and the applicant must work together to explore adjusting the
angle of the louvers on the eastern façade to maximize the view of the park. Any
change may be approved by the Director of Community Development.
6. Specify that clear glass must be installed in the lobby windows to allow the
ground floor lobby to be visible from the outside.
Commissioner Howe commented that the proposed project meets the needs of the
City and the developer as stated in the approved Development Agreement and
should be approved because it is good and represents years of the applicant’s hard
work. He recognized that the applicant has addressed every issue the Commission
has raised, appreciated them for creating visual interest on the south elevation, and
stated that they have been cooperative in agreeing to maintain the living wall and
install clear glass for the ground floor lobby. He added that the proposed project will
be improved when enhancements are made to Plaza del Sol. He urged the
Commissioners to support the motion.
Commissioner Rheaume stated that he will support the motion and agreed with
Commissioner Howe’s remarks. He commented that the applicant has been
responsive to the Commission’s Study Session comments and the proposed project
is beautiful, classy, and high quality, adding that the applicant designed the south
elevation nicely such that it does not need any color. He stated that he can make
the findings and that the proposed project will be a great addition to downtown,
further remarking that he hopes the other Commissioners will also support the
motion.
City of Sunnyvale Page 9
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
Vice Chair Simons stated his opinion that the south elevation is too gray and
recommended a whiter shade that shows the flecks of glass to help the building
appear more modern. He stated his support for the proposed project and said that
its design strongly links it to Plaza del Sol. He remarked about concern for the
safety of the hundreds of employees that would be working in the building, safety
being an inherent issue for the proposed project given its location on the park. Vice
Chair Simons stated his appreciation for the amount of effort spent to integrate the
proposed project with the public spaces and added that he would like to see more
green roofs in the future since roofs will become more important as projects become
taller.
Commissioner Harrison confirmed with Commissioner Howe that the intent of the
fourth proposed condition of approval is for the applicant to work with the City if the
City explores installing a security system on Plaza del Sol, with a linked system
possible for public and private property as Plaza del Sol and the proposed project
are related by design. Commissioner Harrison stated that she will support the
motion, appreciated the architecture, and commented that she agrees with Chair
Howard’s observation that every facet of the building tells a story with a different
view. She also appreciated the living wall, roof garden, all electric construction, art
gallery space, shade structures on the eastern and western elevations for energy
efficiency, and the tabletop street design that integrates the proposed project with
Plaza del Sol.
Commissioner Weiss stated her support for the motion and commented that the
proposed project meets the relevant goals and policies of the DSP, is consistent
with the General Plan, respects the privacy of the adjacent residential building, and
is architecturally and aesthetically pleasing. She encouraged the Commissioners to
support the motion.
Commissioner Olevson stated that he will support the motion and agreed with staff’s
recommended findings. He recognized that the applicant has been responsive to
each concern that the Commission has voiced which has helped result in the
long-term approved Development Agreement. He stated his enthusiastic support for
the proposed project’s design and his anticipation of seeing how Plaza del Sol has
been transformed by it.
Chair Howard voiced his support for the motion and commended the Commission,
staff, and the applicant for the meeting’s successful collaboration. He cited the
proposed condition that would ensure clear glass for the ground floor lobby as an
City of Sunnyvale Page 10
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
example of a great solution that everyone helped work out.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 7 - Chair Howard
Vice Chair Simons
Commissioner Harrison
Commissioner Howe
Commissioner Olevson
Commissioner Rheaume
Commissioner Weiss
No: 0
Assistant Director Miner stated that this decision is final unless appealed or called
up for review by the City Council by Tuesday, October 27, 2020.
STANDING ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL STUDY ISSUES
Assistant Director Andrew Miner stated that staff will present Chair Howard’s
proposed study issue about deemphasizing dwelling units per acre to the
Commission at the October 26, 2020 meeting.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND COMMENTS
-Commissioner Comments
Vice Chair Simons asked Assistant Director Andrew Miner if the City plans to modify
the building code to help protect the city from major fire damage. Assistant Director
Miner stated that he will research the issue and that it is possible that the next State
Building Code cycle may reflect changes to that effect.
-Staff Comments
Assistant Director Andrew Miner stated that on September 29, 2020 staff presented
a Study Session to the City Council on the Moffett Park Specific Plan Update that
proposed three, two-hour public outreach meetings regarding the Update with a City
Council Study Session immediately following each outreach meeting for the City
Council to give feedback, adding that the Commission will be invited to the Study
Session. He also stated that the City Council will consider the Draft 2020 Housing
Strategy and Implementation Schedule at the October 13, 2020 meeting and the
Reach Codes at the October 27, 2020 meeting.
City of Sunnyvale Page 11
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final October 12, 2020
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Howard adjourned the meeting at 9:22 PM.
City of Sunnyvale Page 12
Agenda
City of Sunnyvale
Notice and Agenda - Final
Planning Commission
Monday, October 12, 2020 7:00 PM Telepresence Meeting: City Web Stream |
Comcast Channel 15
Special Meeting - Study Session - Canceled | Public Hearing - 7:00 PM
TELECONFERENCE NOTICE
Because of the COVID-19 emergency and the “shelter in place” orders issued by
Santa Clara County and the State of California, the meeting of the Sunnyvale
Planning Commission on October 12, 2020, will take place by teleconference, as
allowed by Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20.
• Watch the Planning Commission meeting on television over Comcast Channel
15, at https://Sunnyvale.ca.gov/YouTubeMeetings or
https://Sunnyvaleca.Legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
• Submit written comments to the Planning Commission up to 4 hours prior to the
meeting to planningcommission@sunnyvale.ca.gov or by mail to Sunnyvale
Planning Division, 456 W. Olive Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086-3707.
• Teleconference participation: You may provide audio public comment by
connecting to the teleconference meeting online or by telephone. Use the Raise
Hand feature to request to speak (*9 on a telephone):
Meeting Online Link: https://sunnyvale-ca-gov.zoom.us/j/91827390357
Meeting call-in telephone number: 833-548-0276 | Meeting ID: 918 2739 0357
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Executive Order
N-29-20, if you need special assistance to provide public comment, contact the
City at least 2 hours prior to the meeting in order for the City to make reasonable
alternative arrangements for you to communicate your comments. For other
special assistance, please contact the City at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this
meeting. The Planning Division may be reached at 408-730-7440 or at
planning@sunnyvale.ca.gov (28 CFR 35.160 (b) (1)).
City of Sunnyvale Page 1 Printed on 10/8/2020
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final October 12, 2020
STUDY SESSION CANCELED
7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
Call to Order via teleconference.
ROLL CALL
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This category provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the
commission on items not listed on the agenda and is limited to 15 minutes (may
be extended or continued after the public hearings/general business section of the
agenda at the discretion of the Chair) with a maximum of up to three minutes per
speaker. Please note the Brown Act (Open Meeting Law) does not allow the
Planning Commission to take action on an item not listed on the agenda. If you
wish to address the Planning Commission, please refer to the notice at the
beginning of this agenda. Individuals are limited to one appearance during this
section.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and will be
acted upon by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If
a member of the public would like a consent calendar item pulled and discussed
separately, please refer to the notice at the beginning of this agenda.
1.A 20-0878 Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September 28, 2020
Recommendation: Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September
28, 2020 as submitted.
1.B 20-0880 REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 26, 2020
Proposed Project: General Plan Amendment Initiation request to
consider amending the General Plan designation from Commercial to
Low Density Residential for the northwest portion of the site.
Location: 1689 S. Wolfe Road (APN: 309-51-028)
File #: 2020-7436
Zoning: C-1 (Neighborhood Business)/PD (Planned Development)
General Plan: Commercial
Applicant / Owner: PSR Development Inc. (applicant and owner)
Environmental Review: The project is exempt from the California
City of Sunnyvale Page 2 Printed on 10/8/2020
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final October 12, 2020
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15378(a).
Project Planner: Kelly Cha, (408) 730-7408, kcha@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Recommendation: Continue to the Planning Commission hearing date of October
26, 2020.
PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS
If you wish to speak to a public hearing/general business item, please refer to the
notice at the beginning of this agenda. Each speaker is limited to a maximum of
three minutes.
2. 20-0877 Proposed Project: Related applications on a 0.3-acre site:
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: to demolish the existing
buildings and construct a new 141,333 square foot seven (7)
story office building with four (4) levels of underground parking, an
adjustment to the required parking.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: to make adjustments to the
existing parcel boundary, street easement dedication and
vacation and new utility and architectural easements.
Location: 100 Altair Way (APN:209-07-007)
File #: 2016-7438
Zoning: DSP Block 1
Applicant / Owner: Daniel Minkoff, Minkoff Group (applicant/owner)
Environmental Review: No additional review required as per CEQA
Guidelines 15168(c)(2) and (4) - environmental impacts of the project
are addressed in the Downtown Specific Plan Program Environmental
Impact Report (EIR)(State Clearinghouse #2018052020).
Project Planner: Shaunn Mendrin, (408) 730-7431,
smendrin@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Recommendation: Alternative 1:
Make the required Findings required to approve the CEQA
determination that the project is consistent with the Downtown
Specific Plan's Program Environmental Impact Report and no
additional environmental review is required, and approve the
Special Development Permit and Tentative Parcel Map based
on Findings in Attachment 3 and Recommended Conditions of
Approval in Attachment 4.
STANDING ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL STUDY ISSUES
NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND COMMENTS
City of Sunnyvale Page 3 Printed on 10/8/2020
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final October 12, 2020
-Commissioner Comments
-Staff Comments
ADJOURNMENT
Notice to the Public:
Any agenda related writings or documents on this agenda distributed to members
of the Planning Commission are available by contacting the Planning Division at
planning@sunnyvale.ca.gov. Agendas and associated reports are also available at
sunnyvaleca.legistar.com/calendar.aspx 72 hours before the meeting.
Planning a presentation for a Planning Commission meeting? To help you prepare
and deliver your public comments, please review the "Making Public Comments
During City Council or Planning Commission Meetings" document available on the
City website.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that if you file a lawsuit challenging any final decision on
any public hearing item listed in this agenda, the issues in the lawsuit may be
limited to the issues which were raised at the public hearing or presented in
writing to the City at or before the public hearing.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6
imposes a 90-day deadline for the filing of any lawsuit challenging final action on
an agenda item which is subject to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special
assistance in this meeting, please see the notice at the beginning of this agenda.
City of Sunnyvale Page 4 Printed on 10/8/2020
Get email alerts for Sunnyvale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.