Muyni
← Back to Superior

Plan Commission (Meets 2nd Tuesday of each month at 5:00 p.m.)

Regular Meeting

Superior, WI · December 21, 2022

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

PLAN COMMISSION Minutes December 21, 2022 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Chair Jim Paine at 4:00 pm on December 21, 2022 in Government Center Room 201. 1 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Jim Paine (chair), Dennis Dalbec (vice chair), Tylor Elm, Brent Fennessey, Brian Finstad, Ann Porter, Garner Moffat, Dave Strum VIRTUAL: Lindsey Graskey (joined at 4:15) ABSENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT: Planning, Economic Development and Port Director Jason Serck, Planning Tech Stephanie Becken OTHERS PRESENT: Shelly Nelson, Clint Massie, Jeramie and Melissa Olson, Ben and Mary Anderson, Cathy Casper, Jason Jauhola 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION to approve minutes by Commissioner Dalbec, seconded by Fennessey and carried. 3 OLD BUSINESS 3.1 Request for amended Small Business Grant Development Agreement Eddie’s Ribs Planning, Economic Development and Port Director Serck introduced Ben and Mary Anderson’s request for an amendment to their Small Business Grant Development Agreement. The amendment would allow them to submit proofs for ½ of their grant obligations in order to access ½ of their grant funding and also allows the Planning Department to amend the development agreement to extend their contracted time and substitute unfinished projects due to unforeseen circumstances. The Plan Commission has made all of the modifications before in previous grants. MOTION to allow modifications including ½ pay out, extension, and change of projects to the Eddie’s Development Agreement by Commissioner Dalbec, seconded by Finstad and carried. 3.2 Discussion and recommendation for Scenery and Home Superior Landscaping Project with Council President Van Sickle Chair Paine asked to hold topic until Council President Van Sickle was in attendance. Commission agreed. 4 NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Small Business Grant Program Allocation a. Louada Granite LLC b. Shelly LLC DBA Central Pub c. Five Star Automotive PLAN COMMISSION - 12/21/22 Mtg (Meets monthly on 3rd Wednesday at 4:00PM.) Page 1 of 4 Chair Paine introduced the Small Business Grant topic. MOTION by Commissioner Dalbec to consider all of the grant applications together and approve. Seconded by Elm. Planning Technician Becken introduced the 3 applications for 4th quarter, as all applicants were in attendance. The update for the year included the 4th quarter total requests as $32,988 with $53,311 available, making it possible to fund all of the grants at request value if desired. The Small Business Grant Program totals for 2022, if Q4 grants were approved. Total awarded for 2022: $179,638 with $8563.25 declined in Q3 due to amount of grants requested. Commissioner Fennessey asked about the 2023 SBGP allotment. Chair Paine noted it was budgeted the same and would include roll over remainder from 2022. Chair Paine asked commissioners to consider any changes they want to make to the program and have them ready for the January meeting. Vote called on Commissioner Dalbec’s motion and carried.. 4.2 Discussion on housing in manufacturing districts Director Serck introduced topic of allowing new housing in manufacturing districts as citizen Jeramy Olson requested permission to build a residential home in a manufacturing district. Director Serck requested guidance on what the commission would like to see happen with options like if they’d like a special use permit, ordinance change, something else or nothing. Commissioner Moffat thought a Special Use Permit might work best until the full code re-write happened. Commissioner Finstad liked the idea of having the option to put residential into manufacturing, rather than dropping manufacturing into residential with the idea that many people used to live near where they worked. Chair Paine noted that it might be different to put a housing development of multiple housing additions within manufacturing—not wanting to change the nature of manufacturing. Director Serck asked for what sort of conditions the commission might want to see. Commissioner Fennessey asked Director Serck what sort of conditions he’d suggest. Director Serck noted size requirements were most on his mind, thinking that setbacks would still apply as they do in current residential areas. Commissioner Fennessey noted that without conditions, every application becomes approved due to Wisconsin statute. Chair Paine asked the Planning staff to put together a proposal to review at the next Plan Commission meeting. 4.3 Discussion and recommendation for Scenery and Home Superior Landscaping Project with Council President Van Sickle Chair Paine noted Councilor Van Sickle’s joining of the meeting and asked to bring up this topic as it had been held from earlier in the meeting. There were no objections. Director Serck introduced the program, highlighting modifications that had been made with commissioner input. Changes included making the pilot less of a public driven contest and instead rely on staff judges making a recommendation from the applications to Plan Commission. The amount per yard was standardized and increased to make most impact. Plan PLAN COMMISSION - 12/21/22 Mtg (Meets monthly on 3rd Wednesday at 4:00PM.) Page 2 of 4 Tech Becken added that CDBG areas continued to be a priority, but that all homeowners in Superior could apply. Councilor Van Sickle continued mapping out the project noting she’d had positive feedback so far. Commissioner Porter asked about an RFP and for clarification of cohorts and the timeline. Director Serck noted that RFP’s don’t need to be issued if the budget stays under $25,000 per year, which it should for each of the years of the grant. For a pilot, using a single known vendor has been a common practice. The timeline was clarified to be over 3 years with an overlap year between the two winning groups (1 for 2023 & 1 for 2024). When the second group of winners is getting their yard done and the other is in a maintenance year. The final year, 2025 would be the maintenance year for the group that won in 2024. If the program continues, then there would be another overlap year with new winners. Commissioner Dalbec noted a city-wide positivity and the hope that the change would allow for long-term maintenance. Councilor Van Sickle added that the vendor would include education in the package, making sure the winners would be equipped to care for their new spaces. Van Sickle shared she spoke with Planner Skrenes about chunking houses/areas vs scattering winners and the Planner Skrenes said that while chunking might be helpful, programs like this could make for contagious improvements. Commissioner Fennessey asked for clarification about what locations around the city would be considered most favorable for winners. Councilor Van Sickle cited the Comp Plan as showing 5 underserved areas. Chair Paine added a criteria would be what’s most seen. Director Serck gave popular intersections as examples. Commissioner Fennessey asked what the Neighborhood Improvement Fund usually does. Chair Paine said it’s usually used for abatements and tearing down houses, clearing sidewalks and some staff costs. With fewer homes being razed, the fund balance has accumulated the last few years. Commissioner Fennessey shared he didn’t think the amount was too much but considered how beneficial the pilot would be. Councilor Van Sickle shared she’d had positive feedback so far. Commissioner Graskey added that she liked the education piece of the pilot and liked the investment into neighborhoods for homeowners. Chair Paine noted if the program was to continue after 2025, it would likely need to seek another budget source, or request money specifically for the task. Commissioner Porter stated she liked the pilot and would also like to see more investment into parks around the city, continuing to improve the playgrounds to be accessible. Chair Paine replied that parks improvement has been a priority and a volunteer coordinator is being added to maximize volunteer efforts in parks. Commissioner Dalbec added the investment in landscape was great for Tower and trying it residential communities could have a similar impact. MOTION by Commissioner Elm to hold in committee. No second. Failed. MOTION by Commissioner Dalbec to approve the pilot Scenery and Home landscape project with a budget of $30,000 over 3 years with an amendment to keep the pilot limited to the timeline presented. Second by Moffat and carried. PLAN COMMISSION - 12/21/22 Mtg (Meets monthly on 3rd Wednesday at 4:00PM.) Page 3 of 4 RECURRING BUSINESS 4.4 Zoning Code Update a. RFP language discussion Director Serck explained the RFP draft and purpose. Chair Paine directed commissioners to the ‘scope of work’ and asked for any further input beyond what had already been included. Director Serck added there are different styles of zoning code and the current RFP keeps the asks open, but could be more specific if the commission wanted. Chair Paine said the RFP would be sent out to professionals, inviting proposals from different vendors and groups. Commissioner Porter asked for a cost estimate. Director Serck shared it would be similar to the Comprehensive Plan, between $150,000-$200,000. Commissioner Moffat asked if the re-write could be done internally to save money and keep the process local. Chair Paine said the level of involvement for the Plan Commission could be negotiated with whoever is awarded the RFP. Commissioner Elm asked how the current scope was formatted. Director Serck shared Contract Analyst Darwin put it together after researching other similar RFPs in similar communities. Commissioner Porter added she had no interest in doing everything internally, as taking on a $100,000-$200,000 project was not something she could do. Chair Paine said the process will be work, even with a consultant and that it would most likely last a year and he expected exciting proposals. b. Presentation by Commissioner Moffat Commissioner Moffat shared a presentation on different kinds of modern zoning code and the options cities like Superior have—different from the last time the zoning code was written. Commissioners asked if the RFP could be updated to include reference to experience with Open Source code and other code options as Moffat shared. Director Serck said he would see to an update. Chair Paine added there are education and travel opportunities to learn about code/zoning and to talk to him about possible opportunities in the future. 5 ADJOURNMENT With no further business, Mayor Paine adjourned at 5:15 pm. Respectfully submitted by Stephanie Becken. PLAN COMMISSION - 12/21/22 Mtg (Meets monthly on 3rd Wednesday at 4:00PM.) Page 4 of 4

Agenda

PLAN COMMISSION Minutes November 16th, 2022 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chair Dennis Dalbec at 4:00 pm on November 16th, 2022 in Government Center Room 201. 1 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Dennis Dalbec (vice chair), Brent Fennessey, Lindsey Graskey, Brian Finstad, Ann Porter, Garner Moffat VIRTUAL: Tylor Elm, Jim Paine (joined at 4:10) ABSENT: Dave Strum CITY STAFF PRESENT: Planning, Economic Development and Port Director Jason Serck, Planning Assistant Stephanie Becken OTHERS PRESENT: Jeff Cushman, Shelly Nelson, Sean Lentz, Bob Toftey, Jenny Van Sickle (online) 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION to approve minutes by Commissioner Graskey, seconded by Commissioner Porter. Commissioner Moffat noted a spelling error to be corrected, carried. 3 OLD BUSINESS 4 NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Public Hearing for Proposed Project Plan, creation of the Tax Incremental District and Boundaries for proposed Tax Incremental District Number 18 (Henry Cohen Drive and Norther 34th Street) Project. Commissioner Porter stepped out at 4:04 due to conflict of interest. Sean Lentz with Ehlers presented the draft of the TID 18 project plan. Director Serck clarified that projected numbers in the plan are some of the most accurate projections they’ve ever been able to offer on a TID due to the projects already having some planning done by developers. Serck also said Mayor Paine is asking more TIF funds to be designated for building up infrastructure as allowed by the TID process. Commissioner Fennessey asked how that worked and if funding more to infrastructure takes away incentives for building. Fennessey also asked for clarification on the ½ mile radius. Lentz shared that the ½ mile was started around 2007 and has been used by municipalities more in recent years. Serck noted the existing numbers presented in the plan were used for factoring in both economic incentives and the infrastructure, so it did not appear increasing infrastructure would cause any hardships. Legal representative, Bob Toftey, elaborated on the topic, noting that developers entered into agreements with the City, and that commitment from the city ensured that agreed upon payments would be made to the developer, regardless of infrastructure goals. Currently, the ‘pay as you go’ method is preferred, as it ties incentives to the developer paying taxes—usually making the payment a return of all or a portion of the taxes they have paid for a period. PLAN COMMISSION - 11/16/22 Mtg (Meets monthly on 3rd Wednesday at 4:00PM.) Page 1 of 2 Lentz also shared that any project done within the half mile radius for development could potentially ask for TID agreement financing, but any taxation change would not be captured for use in the TID, but would go to general taxation. Vice Chair Dalbec announced the public hearing and called for input 3 times. He closed the hearing. 4.2 Resolution of the Plan Commission of the City of Superior approving the Project Plan and establishing boundaries for Tax Incremental District No. 19 City of Superior, Wisconsin and Recommendation for the creation thereof. MOTION by Commissioner Fennessey to approve the resolution. Seconded by Commissioner Moffat, carried. 4.3 William Stack’s request to submit a Certified Survey Map for property located on North 34th Street. CSM 22-05 MOTION by Commissioner Fennessey to approve the request. Seconded by Commissioner Moffat, carried. Commissioner Porter returned at 4:27 4.4 Scenery and Home Superior Landscaping Project Presentation by Council President Van Sickle Council President Van Sickle shared her thoughts on doing a pilot project to encourage landscaping improvement. Commissioner Finstad expressed approval for the idea as it applied to intentional aesthetic improvements. Commissioner Fennessey asked if other examples existed. President Van Sickle did not know of any direct ones. Assistant Becken shared there are others available, but mostly at much larger scale or in sweep-stakes style format. Discussion continued with clarifying the end goal as beautification, but with openness to what that might mean as far as grouping neighborhoods, choosing recipients, and community buy-in. Commissioners were encouraged to continue thinking about what they might want to see as far as criteria, how the program recipients might be chosen (either through public voting process or through committee), and the topic will be revisited in December. 5 RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Zoning Code Update a. RFP language discussion b. Presentation by Commissioner Moffat Both Items held in committee until December when commission is hopefully whole and in person. Commissioner Moffat and staff will meet before December meeting. 6 ADJOURNMENT MOTION to adjourn by Commissioner Graskey, seconded by Commissioner Fennessey, carried. Respectfully submitted by Stephanie Becken. PLAN COMMISSION - 11/16/22 Mtg (Meets monthly on 3rd Wednesday at 4:00PM.) Page 2 of 2 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 63 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 64 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 65 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 66 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 67 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 68 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 69 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 70 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 71 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 72 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 73 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 74 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 75 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 76 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 77 Plan Commission 11-16-2022 78

Get email alerts for Superior

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting