Muyni
← Back to Troy

Troy Industrial Development Authority

Regular Meeting

Troy, NY · October 18, 2019

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

October 18, 2019 10:00 AM Regular Board Meeting Minutes Present: Heidi Knoblauch, Steve Strichman, Paul Carroll, Hon. Anasha Cummings, Elbert Watson, Rich Nolan, Tina Urzan, Hon. Coleen Paratore Absent: Susan Farrell Also in attendance: Susan Proskine, Anne Rounds, Dylan Turek, Justin Nadeau, Justin Miller Esq., Mary Ellen Flores, Mike DeMasi and Denee Zeigler. The meeting was called to order at 10:15 a.m. I. Minutes The board reviewed the minutes from the September 20, 2019 board meeting. The board noted a correction needed for the authorizing resolutions. Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the September 20, 2019 minutes with anticipated corrections. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. II. Budget Mr. Strichman presented to the board the final version of the budget. Ms. Knoblauch asked that we add in a line item for profession development for staff. Mr. Strichman noted that he will adjust he budget to reflect $10,000. Mr. Watson asked if all board members would be able to participate in the staff development trainings. Ms. Knoblauch advised yet. Ms. Paratore asked about grants not showing under non-operating revenue. Mr. Strichman explained that we don’t get any state/federal grants. He added that we use the same format that the ABO uses in the PARIS system. Paul Carroll made a motion to approve the budget as presented. Elbert Watson seconded the motion, motion carried. III. Executive Director’s report Mr. Strichman noted that as part of professional development, Dylan Turek will be attending a conference put on by CDFA in the amount of $2,500. He advised that we are a member of this agency and provide excellent training. 1 IV. Financials Ms. Flores presented the financials to the board members; $1.1 Million in assets and $192,000 in liabilities and $876,000 in equity. No real changes, but advised that the liabilities are due to PILOTs received but in restricted cash and un-deposited funds account. She noted a surplus of $3,200 due to an administration fee and interest earnings. Paul Carroll made a motion to approve the financials as presented. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. V. Old Business The board acknowledged that this was Paul Carroll’s last meeting. Ms. Knoblauch advised that she has to leave early and the Vice Chair will conduct the rest of the meeting. VI. New Business No new business. VII. Adjournment With no additional business to discuss, the regular board meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting at 10:30 a.m. Hon. Anasha Cummings seconded the motion, motion carried. 2

Agenda

Board Members Chair Tina Urzan Heidi Knoblauch Susan Farrell Vice Chair Elbert Watson Paul Carroll Hon. Anasha Cummings Hon. Coleen Paratore Executive Director Bill Strang Steven Strichman Rich Nolan Jr. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OCTOBER 18, 2019 10:00 a.m. Planning Department Conference Room I. Approval of Minutes from the September 20, 2019 board meeting. II. Budget III. Financials IV. Old Business V. New Business VI. Adjournment City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180 Phone: 518.279.7166 September 20, 2019 10:00 AM Regular Board Meeting Minutes Present: Heidi Knoblauch, Steve Strichman, Paul Carroll, Hon. Anasha Cummings (10:15), Elbert Watson, Rich Nolan, Tina Urzan, Hon. Coleen Paratore (10:35) Absent: Susan Farrell Also in attendance: Justin Miller Esq., Dylan Turek, Mary Ellen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos, Stuart Swiggett, Dan Sanders, Morris Friedman, James Conroy, Sharon Martin and Denee Zeigler. D The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. I. Public Hearing - Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC – Old World Provisions, Inc. Project R See attached public hearing agenda. II. T Public Hearing - Montroy Management L.P. Project AF See attached public hearing agenda. III. Minutes The board reviewed the minutes from the August 16, 2019 board meeting. Mr. Strichman noted that Bill Strang resigned before the August meeting and can be removed from the minutes. Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the August 16, 2019 minutes with anticipated corrections. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. IV. Project Authorizing Resolution – Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC – Old World Provisions, Inc. Project No additional discussion by the board after the public hearing. (See attached Resolution 09/19 #1) Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the Project Authorizing Resolution to Montroy Management L.P. Rich Nolan seconded the motion. Elbert Watson abstained, motion carried. 1 V. Project Authorizing Resolution - Montroy Management L.P. Project No additional discussion by the board after the public hearing. (See attached Resolution 09/19 #2) Paul Carroll made a motion to approve the Project Authorizing Resolution for Montroy Management L.P. Project. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. VI. Financials Ms. Flores presented the financials to the board members; $872,000 in assets and $872,000 in equity. She noted a deficit of $111,000 due to management fees we pay to the city. Mr. Nolan asked about the fee paid to the city each year. Mr. Strichman advised there is a fee paid to the city for use of city staff and resources. Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the financials as presented. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. VII. Old Business D Strong Town Sponsorship - Mr. Strichman explained that last meeting we approved a sponsorship to the Strong Town event, which has been cancelled. No funds were issued. VIII. New Business R Meeting requirements – Mr. Strichman advised that there are new requirements for IDA meetings beginning in January. He explained that the meetings will need to be live streamed. T AF New Board Member – Mr. Strichman explained we should have a new school board member by the next meeting. Tech Valley Center of Gravity – Mr. Strichman advised the board that a sponsorship to the Tech Valley Center of Gravity will provide us with additional meeting space and allow for additional advertising. He noted that a membership is approximately $1000. Rich Nolan made a motion to approve a sponsorship to the Tech Valley Center of Gravity for 2019. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. Project Pipeline – Mr. Strichman advised he will have a project pipeline to present at the next meeting. IX. Adjournment With no new or old business to discuss, the regular board meeting was adjourned at 10:37 a.m. Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting at 10:37 a.m. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. 2 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC – Old World Provisions, Inc. Project) CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180 Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) regarding the Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC – Old World Provisions, Inc. Project held on September 20, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. I. ATTENDANCE Steven Strichman, Executive Director Heidi Knoblauch, Chair Paul Carroll, Vice Chair Elbert Watson, Treasurer Rich Nolan, Board Member D Tina Urzan, Board Member Justin Miller, Esq., Board Counsel Mary Ellen Flores, CFO Denee Zeigler, Acting Secretary R Stuart Swiggett, Company Representative Sharon Martin, City of Troy Assessor Dylan Turek, City of Troy Economic Development Director Danny Sanders Morris Friedman T AF Jim Conroy Deanna Dal Pos II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Heidi Knoblauch opened the hearing and Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record: This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing. III. PROJECT SUMMARY The Authority previously undertook a certain project (the “2009 Project”) for the benefit of Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC (the “Company”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of fee title to or a leasehold interest in one or more parcels of real property located at 10 and 12 Industrial Park Road, Troy, New York 12180 (the “2009 Land”) and the existing improvements and approximately 9,000 square foot building located thereon, if any (the “2009 Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation, refurbishment and equipping of the 2009 Existing Improvements and construction and installation of an approximately 10,000 square foot refrigerated warehouse addition to the Existing Improvements for use as an integrated mat processing and warehouse facility (collectively, the “2009 Improvements”) to be leased for operations to Old World Provisions, Inc. (the “Operator”), and (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the 2009 Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s projected increase in the number of employees currently working at the Project facility (the “2009 Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “2009 Facility”). In furtherance of the 2009 Project, the Authority and Company entered into (i) that certain Lease Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2009 (the “Lease Agreement”), with acknowledgment and guaranty of the Operator wherein the Company leased the 2009 Facility to the Authority, (ii) that certain Leaseback Agreement, also dated as of February 1, 2009, with acknowledgment and guaranty of the Operator (the “Leaseback Agreement”), wherein the D Authority leased the 2009 Facility back to the Company, (iii) that certain Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2009 (the “PILOT Agreement”), with acknowledgment and guaranty of the Operator wherein the Company is obligated to make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of Affected Tax Jurisdictions, and (iv) related documents R (collectively, the foregoing being referred to as the “2009 Authority Documents”). The Company has submitted a new Application requesting the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) retention of the Authority’s leasehold T interests that certain 4.74 acre parcel of land located at 12 Industrial Park Road in the City of AF Troy (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 112.00-4-34) and the existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 20,000 sf of building space utilized for the production and packaging of specialty meat products by the Operator (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of an approximately 13,300 sf building addition to expand production and related space and amenities, including production and building system improvements, modifications, upgrades, parking lot, curbage and related site and exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company. It is contemplated that the Authority will retain a leasehold interest in the Facility and continue to lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Attached IV. SEQRA: For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA. VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS No board member or public comments. Ms. Knoblauch noted that this is a great IDA D project; creating jobs and expanding a commercial property. Mr. Strichman added that the company did a great job working with their surrounding neighbors. Mr. Watson asked how long they have been in the City of Troy. Mr. Swiggett advised about twelve years. VII. ADJOURNMENT R As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:12 a.m. T AF PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (Montroy Management L.P. Project) CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180 Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) regarding the (Montroy Management L.P. Project) held on September 20, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. I. ATTENDANCE Steven Strichman, Executive Director Heidi Knoblauch, Chair Paul Carroll, Vice Chair Elbert Watson, Treasurer Rich Nolan, Board Member Tina Urzan, Board Member D Hon. Anasha Cummings, Board Member Hon. Coleen Paratore, Board Member Justin Miller, Esq., Board Counsel Mary Ellen Flores, CFO R Denee Zeigler, Acting Secretary Danny Sanders, Company Representative Morris Friedman, Company Representative Jim Conroy, Company Representative T Sharon Martin, City of Troy Assessor AF Dylan Turek, City of Troy Economic Development Director Deanna Dal Pos II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Heidi Knoblauch opened the hearing and Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record: This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by Montroy Management L.P. to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing. III. PROJECT SUMMARY MONTROY MANAGEMENT L.P., for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in parcels of land located at 523-525 Fourth Avenue and 532 Third Avenue, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 080.063-4-2 and 080.063-4- 1) and the existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 50,000 sf of building spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the demolition and renovation of the Existing Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a 31 unit market rate apartment facility, including building system improvements, modifications, upgrades, parking lot, curbage and related site and exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company. It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and D rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare R and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Attached T IV. SEQRA: AF For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA. VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Urzan explained that she is happy to see a property being added onto the tax rolls, but not a lot of jobs being created. Mr. Strichman noted that this is the first IDA project for the Lansingburgh neighborhood. He added that with this type of project, there is not a lot of job creation, but other benefits. Mr. Carroll asked about the burned out house on Third Ave. Mr. Conroy advised that property is in the permitting stage and should be completed in the upcoming weeks. Mr. Watson asked if the assessed value is carried through each year. Mr. Strichman advised that it is and will go up a small amount each year. Mr. Miller explained that the assessed value shown on the cost-benefit analysis is used as a base and the future payments will be abated; it will not go lower than the current assessment. Mr. Strichman advised that eventually it will be brought up to the assessed value after all of the improvements. Mr. Watson expressed his concerns about the large amount of savings that will occur over the first ten years of this project, which is not affordable housing. Mr. Strichman advised that for projects such as this, there would not be a project. Mr. Conroy noted that the entry level for the proposed units are much less in this building than some of the recent projects. Ms. Knoblauch explained that the role of the IDA is to help this type of project come into an urban center and rehabilitate a building, that otherwise would not be on the tax rolls and generate income for the city. She added that once this project is complete, it will generate and additional $660,000 per year. Ms. Knoblauch advised that this abatement of taxes will help the developer to slowly fill the building and mitigate the risk. Mr. Strichman advised that one of the factors that made this project attractive was that it would be putting a previously tax exempt property on the tax rolls. Mr. Conroy explained that the money saved through the IDA benefits will be reinvested back into the project. It also allows him to upgrade certain areas of the project. Ms. Urzan noted that she appreciates this Q&A and feels it helps to explain the process to the public. She added that if this project doesn’t happen, it could leave a large vacant space in that neighborhood. Mr. Watson asked if we get a copy of the appraisal. Mr. Turek noted that we do not ask for the appraisal, rather work closely with the city’s assessor to determine the value. Ms. Knoblauch noted that for this type of project the profit margin is most likely on the lower side. Mr. Turek agreed and added that the cost of construction for an adaptive re-use project doesn’t leave much for profit. VII. D ADJOURNMENT R With no additional comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:28 a.m. T AF PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION (Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC – Old World Provisions, Inc. Project) A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was convened on September 20, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York 12180. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the following members of the Authority were: MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT Heidi Knoblauch X Richard Nolan X Hon. Anasha Cummings X Elbert Watson X D Hon. Coleen Paratore Paul Carroll Susan Farrell Tina Urzan X X X X R The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Dylan Turek, Justin Miller, Esq., Mary Ellen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos, Stuart Swiggett, Danny Sanders, Morris T Friedman, Jim Conroy, Sharon Martin and Denee Zeigler. AF After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a proposed project for the benefit of Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC – Old World Provisions, Inc. On motion duly made by Tina Urzan and seconded by Rich Nolan, the following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority: Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent Heidi Knoblauch X Richard Nolan X Hon. Anasha Cummings X Elbert Watson X Hon.Coleen Paratore X Paul Carroll X Susan Farrell X Tina Urzan X Page 1 of 10 Resolution No. 09/19 #1 RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT OF INDUSTRIAL PARK COLD STORAGE, LLC (THE “COMPANY”); (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT (“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to D own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, the Authority previously undertook a certain project (the “2009 Project”) for R the benefit of Industrial Park Cold Storage, LLC (the “Company”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of fee title to or a leasehold interest in one or more parcels of real property located at 10 and 12 Industrial Park Road, Troy, New York 12180 (the “2009 Land”) and the existing improvements and approximately 9,000 square foot building located thereon, if T any (the “2009 Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation, refurbishment and equipping of the AF 2009 Existing Improvements and construction and installation of an approximately 10,000 square foot refrigerated warehouse addition to the Existing Improvements for use as an integrated mat processing and warehouse facility (collectively, the “2009 Improvements”) to be leased for operations to Old World Provisions, Inc. (the “Operator”), and (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the 2009 Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s projected increase in the number of employees currently working at the Project facility (the “2009 Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “2009 Facility”); and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the 2009 Project, the Authority and Company entered into (i) that certain Lease Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2009 (the “Lease Agreement”), with acknowledgment and guaranty of the Operator wherein the Company leased the 2009 Facility to the Authority, (ii) that certain Leaseback Agreement, also dated as of February 1, 2009, with acknowledgment and guaranty of the Operator (the “Leaseback Agreement”), wherein the Authority leased the 2009 Facility back to the Company, (iii) that certain Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2009 (the “PILOT Agreement”), with acknowledgment and guaranty of the Operator wherein the Company is obligated to make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of Affected Tax Jurisdictions, and (iv) related Page 2 of 10 documents (collectively, the foregoing being referred to as the “2009 Authority Documents”); and WHEREAS, the Company has submitted a new Application requesting the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) retention of the Authority’s leasehold interests that certain 4.74 acre parcel of land located at 12 Industrial Park Road in the City of Troy (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 112.00-4-34) and the existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 20,000 sf of building space utilized for the production and packaging of specialty meat products by the Operator (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of an approximately 13,300 sf building addition to expand production and related space and amenities, including production and building system improvements, modifications, upgrades, parking lot, curbage and related site and exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, D and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and WHEREAS, by resolution adopted August 16, 2019 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the R Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling, notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and (iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and T AF WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled, noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on September 20, 2019 whereat all interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or in writing on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, the Planning Commission of the City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”), previously reviewed the Project and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”) with respect to the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated the terms of an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), amendments to the Lease Agreement, Leaseback Agreement and the PILOT Agreement, along with related documents, and, subject to the conditions set forth within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will retain a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the Company agent of the Authority to undertake the Project Page 3 of 10 and lease the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the term of the amended Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of Financial Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating to one or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines that: (A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and D convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all powers granted to it under the Act; and (B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the Act; and (C) R The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and T otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and AF (D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and (E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission and determined the Project involves an “Unlisted Action” as said term is defined under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the Negative Declaration, related Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the SEQRA determination made by the Planning Commission and the Authority further finds that (i) the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the Page 4 of 10 environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA. Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement. Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the amended Leaseback Agreement and/or a related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the D acquisition of a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution and delivery of the amended Leaseback Agreement, R wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts, orders, receipts, writings and T instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority to delegate such agency, in AF whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. The foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake the Project shall expire on December 31, 2020, unless extended by the Executive Director of the Authority upon written application by the Company. Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and local sales and use tax in an amount up to $3,375,000.00, which result in New York State and local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed $270,000.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s). Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or Page 5 of 10 purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture Event”). D As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the R benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority, cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the T Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority. AF Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A) the Agent Agreement, wherein the Authority will appoint the Company as agent to undertake the Project, (B) amended Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Authority, (C) amended Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the Company, (D) amended PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions (along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement, or in the discretion of the Executive Director, a sufficient guaranty of performance under the amended Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement), and (E) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project. Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and Page 6 of 10 to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents, security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same, all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project. Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees, charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the D opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms, covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority. Section 7. R These Resolutions shall take effect immediately. T AF Page 7 of 10 T AF R D EXHIBIT A PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS D R T AF Page 9 of 10 EXHIBIT B SEQRA MATERIALS D R T AF Page 10 of 10 PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION (Montroy Management L.P. Project) A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was convened on September 20, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York 12180. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the following members of the Authority were: MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT Heidi Knoblauch X Richard Nolan X Hon. Anasha Cummings X Elbert Watson X D Hon. Coleen Paratore Paul Carroll Susan Farrell Tina Urzan X X X X R The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Dylan Turek, Justin Miller, Esq., Mary Ellen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos, Stuart Swiggett, Danny Sanders, Morris T Friedman, Jim Conroy, Sharon Martin and Denee Zeigler. AF After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a proposed project for the benefit of Montroy Management L.P., for itself or an entity to be formed. On motion duly made by Paul Carroll and seconded by Tina Urzan, the following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority: Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent Heidi Knoblauch X Richard Nolan X Hon. Anasha Cummings X Elbert Watson X Hon. Coleen Paratore X Paul Carroll X Susan Farrell X Tina Urzan X Page 1 of 9 Resolution No. 09/19 #2 RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT OF MONTROY MANAGEMENT L.P. (THE “COMPANY”); (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT (“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to D own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, MONTROY MANAGEMENT L.P., for itself and/or on behalf of an R entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in parcels of land located at 523-525 Fourth Avenue and 532 Third Avenue, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 080.063-4-2 and T 080.063-4-1) and the existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 50,000 AF sf of building spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the demolition and renovation of the Existing Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a 31 unit market rate apartment facility, including building system improvements, modifications, upgrades, parking lot, curbage and related site and exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and WHEREAS, by resolution adopted August 16, 2019 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling, notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and (iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled, noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on September 20, 2019 whereat all interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or Page 2 of 9 in writing on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, the Planning Commission of the City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”), previously reviewed the Project and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”) with respect to the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated the terms of an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), a Lease Agreement (the “Lease Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related Payment-in-lieu-of-Tax Agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set forth within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the D Company agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the term of the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of Financial Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating R to one or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement. T NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY AF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines that: (A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all powers granted to it under the Act; and (B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the Act; and (C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and (D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one Page 3 of 9 area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and (E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission and determined the Project involves an “Unlisted Action” as said term is defined under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the Negative Declaration, related Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the SEQRA determination made by the Planning Commission and the Authority further finds that (i) the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the D environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA. Section 2. R The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in T furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax AF exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement. Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts, orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. The Page 4 of 9 foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake the Project shall expire on December 31, 2020, unless extended by the Executive Director of the Authority upon written application by the Company. Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and local sales and use tax in an amount up to $3,045,660.00, which result in New York State and local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed $243,660.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s). Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or D purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption R benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company T has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and AF use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture Event”). As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority, cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority. Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A) the Agent Agreement, wherein the Authority will appoint the Company as agent to undertake the Page 5 of 9 Project, (B) the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Authority, (C) the Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the Company, (D) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions (along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement, or in the discretion of the Executive Director, a sufficient guaranty of performance under the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement), and (E) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project. Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents, D security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional R costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same, all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the T execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive AF Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project. Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees, charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms, covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority. Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately. Page 6 of 9 T AF R D EXHIBIT A PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS D R T AF Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT B SEQRA MATERIALS D R T AF Page 9 of 9

Get email alerts for Troy

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting