Tree Board
Regular MeetingTumwater, WA · November 13, 2023
Minutes
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 1
CONVENE: 7:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Chair Trent Grantham and Boardmembers Brent Chapman, Brodrick Coval,
Michael Jackson, Hannah Ohman, and Jim Sedore.
Excused: Boardmember Tanya Nozawa.
Staff: Sustainability Coordinator Alyssa Jones Wood and Intern Amita
Devarajan.
CHANGES TO There were no changes to the agenda.
AGENDA:
TREE BOARD No reports were offered by members of the Board.
MEMBER
REPORTS:
COORDINATOR’S Coordinator Jones Wood reported the staff prepared and forwarded a letter
REPORT: to the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) in response to the new
Washington Wildland-Urban Interface Code. AWC incorporated the letter
and sent a separate letter to the Washington State Building Code Council.
Staff is engaged in conversations with the Washington State Building Code
Council to address some of the City’s concerns surrounding the code. A
meeting of the State Building Code Council is scheduled with possible
action by the Council. The deadline for finalizing the code is March 2024.
Many other cities plan to engage during the legislative session to improve
the code.
Boardmember Sedore asked whether an environmental impact statement
has been completed on the proposed legislation. Coordinator Jones Wood
replied that the letter from AWC references environmental impacts and
points out provisions in the code subject to an environmental impact
statement. Manager Medrud had provided the Board with a memorandum
of a synopsis of the proposed code. Additionally, the Water Resources &
Sustainability Department released a memorandum on how the code would
affect the City in terms of water usage for irrigation, stormwater
inconsistencies, stream temperature inconsistencies, and other impacts.
Boardmember Sedore asked whether the code, if passed, would be
retroactive or apply only to future construction. Coordinator Jones Wood
advised that the law would be applicable to future construction and new
building permits, which includes new decks and other smaller building
renovations.
Coordinator Jones Wood advised that the three sections of forestry codes
the Board and the City have been working are pending until the state adopts
the code to avoid any City conflicts with state law. The code is scheduled
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 2
for completion by March 15, 2024 and adopted by the Legislature prior to
the end of the 2024 session. The City is required to adopt an ordinance
adopting the code.
At the December meeting, the Board is scheduled to receive a briefing from
City directors and staff on the status of implementation actions in the Urban
Forestry Management Plan, as well as the street tree inventory. The City’s
consultant inspected and documented 1,508 trees located at City buildings
and facilities. The consultant collected data on an additional 545 trees on
40 plots using sampling methods. Ground truthing has been initiated by
staff based on the 2018 street tree inventory. Volunteers will assist in
ground truthing. Coordinator Jones Wood described volunteer outreach
efforts staff is pursuing to solicit volunteers. A data sheet will include
space for notes, such as documenting the condition of a tree or sidewalk
area in need of repair. The consultant is required to provide all inventory
data by mid-December. Staff is preparing a list of areas with estimated
times to complete an inventory of trees to provide to potential volunteers.
She encouraged member to sign-up to inventory some sections of the City.
She demonstrated the TreeKeeper software program to input tree inventory
data. Because of the time of year, it will be difficult to identify species of
trees. Because of the mid-December deadline, inventorying will be on a
short timeline. Volunteers have the option of inventorying more than one
area of street trees maintained by the City. Inventorying can be completed
any time. The consultant is using the TreeKeeper program to track data
collection. All City properties will be inventoried of existing trees except
for large natural areas that will be inventoried as a sampling block.
Coordinator Jones Wood advised that information is on track to submit to
Tree City USA to continue the City’s Tree City USA designation.
Olympia Ecosystems has identified a restoration site in Tumwater and
invited staff and the Board for a tour on Friday, November 17, 2023.
Coordinator Jones Wood invited members to participate in the visit to the
Deschutes River Preserve restoration site.
Boardmember Sedore asked whether efforts on tree inventorying are linked
to City operations in terms of replacement or removal of trees to ensure the
actions are included within the inventory. Coordinator Jones Wood
responded that she is working with City GIS to complete the work as the
action is included within the Urban Forestry Management Plan. Staff has
been transitioning to new software used by the City for accounting, asset
inventory, invoicing, and other operational processes. The work order
system for staff is currently not compatible with the older system. Staff is
working on transitioning existing data tree removal and tree additions.
Boardmember Sedore asked whether the inventory accounts for when trees
were planted. Coordinator Jones Wood advised that the specific planting
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 3
date is not included other than the data collection date. Boardmember
Sedore recommended notating the date of tree planting for future reference.
Coordinator Jones Wood noted that the inventory is specific to City
maintained trees only.
PUBLIC There were no public comments.
COMMENT:
INTERN STREET Intern Amita Devarajan reported their efforts included research on the
TREE REVIEW affects of climate change in the Puget Sound Region to determine how
PROJECT: bioclimatic changes predicted to occur will affect native trees and trees
included in the City’s draft of an approved tree list. Initial research
acknowledges that cities are beginning to recognize the importance of urban
forests for enhancing the general quality of life, as well as a way to combat
and adapt to climate change. The resilience of trees and urban forests and
ecosystem benefits are under threat from the impacts of climate change.
Based on studies and several resources from Washington State agencies,
impacts will worsen over time. It is crucial to take action and begin moving
forward on climate adaptation by planting street trees and urban forests.
Intern Devarajan reported they reviewed broad bioclimatic conditions of the
Puget Sound Region. The region has been warming at a rate of 0.2 °F per
decade since 1960 with the average temperature projected to increase by 5
°F under a low climate change scenario. The range could increase by 8.6 °F
under a high climate change scenario by the end of the century. The
average number of days greater than 86 °F determine Heat Zones. The
Puget Sound Region historically experiences Heat Zone 2 (1 to 7 days)
exceeding 30 °C or 86 °F. Under the intermediate climate change scenario,
climate is projected to stay in Heat Zone 5 by 2039 and shift to Heat Zone 3
(7 to 14 days) exceeding 30 °C by 2040 to 2069. Under the high climate
change scenario, climate is projected to shift to Heat Zone 3 by 2039 and
Heat Zone 4 (14 to 30) by 2040 to 2069. Eventually the region will
experience Heat Zone 6 for 45 days exceeding 30 °C by 2070 through 2099.
The Puget Sound Region experiences Hardiness Zone 8 or -12.2 °C to -6.7
°C. Under a low climate change scenario, the hardiness zone is projected to
stay in Zones 8A to 8B in the Puget Sound Region by 2039. The zone will
then shift over time to Zone 9 by 2040 to 2069. Under a high climate
change scenario, the hardiness zone is projected to shift completely to Zone
9 to 2039 and remain in Zone 9 until 2099.
The results imply that less hardy tree species may be able to grow in the
region and could drastically alter the ecological benefits already existing in
urban forests. Expanding on that possibility, Intern Devarajan reported they
researched a report titled, Climate Change Vulnerability of Urban Trees,
Puget Sound Region, Washington. The report assesses the impacts of
climate change on habitat suitability and heat transfer zones of three tree
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 4
species native to the Puget Sound Region of Western red cedar, Western
hemlock, and Douglas fir. The report found that the range of those species
in Puget Sound is likely to continue to provide climate conditions suitable
for the species by the end of the century; however, individual seed transfer
zones of the species are considered separately. Bioclimatic conditions that
comprise the current seed transfer zone in Puget Sound for Western red
cedar, Western hemlock, and Douglas fir are likely to diminish, shift further
Northwest toward the Canadian islands, or disappear by the end of the
century. With predicted bioclimatic conditions, the report suggests
increasing the diversity of seed sources that include current seed zones as
well as future seed zones as it may enhance and ensure the probability of
successful reforestation and restoration of Western red cedar and other
native trees species in the region.
Precipitation in the region has increased by 0.49 inches per decade since
1960 and is projected to increase by 2.1 to 3.2 inches under the low and
high climate change scenarios by the end of the century. In a thesis
authored by Jacquie S. Kwok on An Evaluation Of Potential Policy Tools
And Frameworks For Urban Tree Canopy Cover Management In North
Vancouver, the author documents through research that urban trees and
urban forest canopy cover have a great capacity for rainfall retention and the
ability to influence the lifetime velocity and peak flows of stormwater
runoff. On average in coastal Vancouver, B.C., the rainfall interception rate
of Douglas firs was 49.1% and in Western red cedars, the rate was 60.9%.
The significant portions of rainfall captured and evaporated rather than
contributing to urban storm flows have significant implications on flood
protection in urban environments. The additional utilities by urban forests
are also compromised as canopy cover decreases, which has been a trend in
Washington State. The author emphasizes the notable advantages of
planting large, longer lived trees as they reduce the number of trees required
and removal of trees at the end of its lifespan, as well as lowering the long-
term costs and fuel consumption required for maintenance.
The difference between deciduous and evergreen trees is also important as
evergreen trees retain foliage year-round and have a greater ability to
attenuate rainfall throughout the year. Aside from the direct impacts of
climate change, other smaller impacts will occur in urban environments as
an indirect consequence, such as insect outbreaks and pests. Scientists have
documented the presence of pests as more abundant on urban trees than in
rural trees. Research supports the conclusion that urban heat may explain
those affects.
Intern Devarajan cited information in a study, Urban Warming Drives
Insect Pest Abundance on Street Trees of evidence that scale insect
populations may be locally adapted or individuals have been climatized to
the temperature of urban habitat patches in which they reside. The effect
was observed over a temperature gradient common in many urban heat
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 5
islands indicating that urban warming poses a broad and immediate threat to
urban trees and the services they provide including cooling and carbon
sequestration. The adaptation or acclimatization of herbivorous pests to
warm environments may represent an ecological tipping point after which
pests can overwhelm plant defenses and escape natural enemy control.
Temperature increases of similar magnitude are predicted under global
climate change if rising global temperatures trigger herbivorous pests
similar to the ones observed in the study as both urban and rural trees may
be threatened by greatly increased herbivore pests in the future by several
orders of magnitude of threat.
The main goal of the study and research was to provide usable information
for the City. The research involved a tree species vulnerability assessment
comprised of a list of numerous conditions that compile outcomes based on
many research articles and studies. The goal was using the trees within the
draft of the Street Tree List to cross compare to the assessment to develop a
spreadsheet assessing the vulnerability of trees on the list.
The assessment summarizes climate change projections for the Puget Sound
Region and provides an assessment of tree species vulnerability in the
region. It considers projected shifts in plant hardiness and heat zones and
compiles research of how species of interest are projected to tolerate future
conditions while assessing the adaptability of planted trees to drought,
flooding, wind damage, and air pollution, as well as environmental
conditions such as shade, soils, and restricted rooting. The results
summarize that of the evaluated tree species, 27% received a high
adaptability score, 59% received a medium adaptability score, and 14%
received a low adaptability score. When considering heat zones only, the
majority of tree species fall into the low to moderate vulnerability category.
The ratings remained the same between low and high climate change
projections because all assessed tree species are considered suitable under
the heat zone projections through the end of the century.
Intern Devarajan reviewed a list of tree species with a vulnerability rating of
low, low-moderate, moderate-high, and high in heat and hardiness zones.
Of the tree species, only big leaf maple is native to the Pacific Northwest.
Many of the trees in the study were not native to the Pacific Northwest and
some were from different countries. Policymakers should consider that tree
species vulnerability does not represent a planting list and should be
combined with knowledge of the region and other factors, such as
aesthetics, local site conditions, wildlife value, or nursery availability.
Other important considerations include using the information incongruent
with information from local climate experts and studies of the local area.
Chair Grantham commented on the number of maple trees planted within
the City. He asked about the species that would serve the City the best.
Intern Devarajan advised that the best species are those ranked in low
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 6
vulnerability for heat and hardiness including red maple. Several maple
species are predicted for tolerance of high heat, such as red maple and
Norway maple. Many native trees reflect some signs of struggle, as well as
species used for reforestation, such as Douglas fir and Western hemlock.
Coordinator Jones Wood noted that the proposed draft of the Street Trees
List includes some native trees for landscape areas only that are not located
near sidewalks but for unimproved right-of-way. The current list does not
include any native tree species.
Boardmember Sedore spoke to his former occupation in forestry and how
the state’s reforestation efforts are divided into seed zones. The state was
careful in reforestation efforts to plant seeds from the area in which the seed
had originated. However, it appears the cited research recommends not
pursuing that methodology and using other seed sources that have been
under more stress (higher temperatures, lower precipitation) and planting
those seeds to reforest native forests because in the future, the species will
need to have those genetic characteristics to survive climate change. He
also understands that plants and animals are negatively affected by weather
extremes rather than averages. He asked whether the research related to
climate change is indicative of radical extremes in temperature and
precipitation rather than average fluctuations in temperature, and whether
the direction is to plant trees found in Northern California in the future, as
the Pacific Northwest will be experiencing the same type of climate in the
future.
Intern Devarajan said their understanding of the research speaks to a
suggestion of a mix of diversity of seeds from different seedlots. However,
in terms of weather extremes, most studies accounted for extreme weather
other than for testing of high extreme in temperatures, which increases the
pest population. Most of the information used data from the 1960s,
averaged the data, and factored future parameters.
Coordinator Jones Wood added that in terms of extreme weather, a lower
level of certainty exists amongst scientists for predictions because a greater
level of certainty can be provided by using averages.
Boardmember Sedore noted that extreme temperature could kill, which
speaks to the importance of planning for extreme temperatures.
Coordinator Jones Wood responded that the global average temperature of
any temperature increase above 1.5 degrees results in more death and
destruction and when it increases above 2 degrees, it creates significantly
more destruction and deaths.
Boardmember Sedore pointed out that the Pacific Northwest climate
receives much precipitation throughout most of the year except during the
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 7
summer when 90 to 120 days of summer drought often occurs. If climate
change increases the severity of summer drought regardless of the amount
of precipitation the Pacific Northwest receives in December, the problem is
not receiving any precipitation from May to October affecting plant
survivability.
Boardmember Chapman reported that on the Capitol Campus, the
Department of Enterprise Services is employing multiple strategies. He
cited the importance of diversity of species that are tolerant of various
conditions. More native species are being planted on the campus, as well as
planting different species not considered 10 years ago, such as Chinese
Pistache, which grows fast and can live up to 150 years, tolerates heat,
drought, and a wide range of soils and pH levels. The Department has
implemented a diversity of strategies, which he encouraged the City to
consider rather than limiting a strategy to tree species reduce risk.
Discussion followed on the tree species for the annual Arbor Day tree
giveaway. Coordinator Jones Wood invited the Board to assist staff in
sourcing plants for the tree giveaway in April.
Intern Devarajan commented that many regions in the state are using seed
sources from the Toutle area for reforestation and restoration efforts.
In response to questions about the vulnerability chart of different species,
Intern Devarajan explained that the chart is based on the Tree Species
Vulnerability Assessment for the Puget Sound Region. Most of the factors
are related to urban conditions including heat and hardiness zones. They
were asked about the score related to adaptability. Intern Devarajan said the
plant adaptability score is based on a scoring system of different factors for
vulnerabilities of disease, drought, ice, and other factors. They offered to
follow-up with additional information.
Boardmember Chapman said that based on his experience, the adaptability
scores are accurate in terms of the species that are more resilient. Street
trees are more survivable during adverse conditions. However, other
variables are included such as a species suitable for heat and hardiness that
might score lower for adaptability because the species is not drought
tolerant.
Coordinator Jones Wood advised that the next step is finalizing the list for
review by the Board in conjunction with the Planning Commission during a
joint worksession. The review will discuss the results, possible removal of
some trees, and, and listing trees based on a series of factors rather than
alphabetically.
Boardmember Chapman noted that availability is also an important factor to
include.
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 8
Discussion ensued on resources to consult for annual updating of the list
and sources of availability, such as Oregon rather than locally as it might
speak to hardiness to future conditions.
Intern Devarajan reported that generally, urban trees in the Puget Sound
Region would be facing the general effects of future bioclimatic conditions
while experiencing altered ecological dynamics and changes pertinent to the
urban environments of Tumwater. Indirect effects of the urban forest
within the region may occur through the changing and increased abundance
of insects, pests, and pathogens, and non-native invasive species, as well as
the probability, severity, and extent of severe storms with urban storm
runoff. The projected changes in climate, associated impacts, and
vulnerabilities have important implications for urban forest management
including the planting and maintenance of street and park trees, equity and
environmental justice efforts, and long-term planning from partnerships. In
terms of longevity of trees in the landscape, future scenarios of urban trees
and forests that are resilient or in decline will depend on the management
and planning actions. Recommendations from the references and articles
highlight consideration by policymakers and urban forestry planners to:
Incorporate the role of climate change as a driver of urban tree die
back and mortality into adaptive management practice to reduce
risks and economic losses, maintenance of urban canopy cover for
rainfall interception as an adaptive measure
Forming adaptive management using a combination of tree
inventory analyses and monitoring with forecasts of urban forest
responses under different climate change and management
scenarios
Collaboration between governments, scientists, and the public to
develop locally engaged and long-term monitoring plans
Selection of urban trees that have a critical influence on the
adaptability of future urban forests and street trees particularly with
the intricacies of climate change.
Careful considerations for defining seed sources for restoration and
reforestation of urban forests in the region and to adopt existing
plant ecotypes.
Identify species likely to be tolerant of future climate and support
planting, maintenance, and preservation of trees through urban
forestry planning and management.
Boardmember Sedore questioned the possibility of analyzing the data based
on natural laws rather than municipal laws by considering the potential loss
of specific species because of climate change as opposed to municipal
practices. Coordinator Jones Wood advised against identifying any loss of
individual trees because of climate change as most trees removed were
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 9
because of infrastructure, visual, or screening issues. For natural areas,
sample plot losses could be factored on climate change, as well as in the
future as it would be possible to track the reason for removal.
Boardmember Sedore offered that it would be helpful in the future to ensure
some means of noting whether a loss of a tree(s) was by wind, drought,
storm damage, etc., as it might be possible to recognize tree species that
might be more vulnerable to storm damage than other species.
PROPOSED NON- Coordinator Jones Wood referred to a prior memorandum of proposed
REGULATORY examples of regulatory incentives and programs. The information was
INCENTIVES AND drafted based on information from other towns and cities in the Pacific
PROGRAMS: Northwest for different non-regulatory incentives for private and public
properties. The Urban Forestry Management Plan includes two action items
related to non-regulatory incentives and programs. Following the initial
review by the Board, staff was asked to provide a recommendation based on
the list of examples. During the interim, the City received a grant with a
required 50% match. The request to the Board is to review the proposed list
of recommendations and provide a recommendation to include some actions
in the next biennium budget. The total recommended program would be
budgeted at $58,465 per year with additional staff resources to administer
the program with half of the cost funded by the grant for a total of
approximately $29,000 allocated in the budget each year.
Coordinator Jones Wood reviewed the program proposal:
Develop a subsidized street tree-trimming program to assist low-
and moderate-income Tumwater residents struggling to maintain
existing street trees. Income thresholds for the program and other
qualifying programs included would be developed after stakeholder
outreach. The City would contract with an ISA Certified Arborist to
perform maintenance and trimming on properties selected for the
program at a cost estimated at $32,000 per year (160 hours per
year). The US Forest Service grant covers 50 percent or $16,000 of
the program each year for four years of the grant.
Recommendations for public plantings was not included for right-
of-way and street trees pending information from the inventory
identifying priority planting areas based on environment justice and
equity measures.
Two programs to address private properties: one for retaining
existing trees and one for planting more trees:
o Continue the annual Arbor Day Tree Giveaway and add one
more data-driven targeted annual giveaway. The giveaway
should prioritize and target participation from private
property owners/renters of the City in census block groups
with a Tree Equity Score of 84 or less, census tracts
Environmental Health Disparity score of 8 or higher, or areas
identified in the City of Tumwater Tree Inventory as priority
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 10
planting areas. Staff recommends retaining 60 percent of
funding allocated for the program for addresses falling into
the categories as identified. To reach those residents and
property owners effectively in the target areas, the City
would conduct an annual mailing and/or door hanger
outreach campaign to encourage participation. The property
owner participating in this program would be responsible for
the trees once they leave the in-person planting workshop.
To participate residents would need to:
1. Apply to the program;
2. Attend a pre-recorded tree care webinar or the annual
in-person planting and care workshop;
3. Be responsible for bringing the trees, watering bags,
compost, and mulch home from the in-person
planting and care workshop; and
4. Sign a Tree Care Pledge
The program is estimated to provide 100 trees per year. The
trees would not be provided to apartment dwellers as the goal
is to plant trees in soil in areas of single-family homes,
duplexes, triplexes, four-plexes, or accessory dwelling units.
Boardmember Sedore questioned the authorities for determining where
trees are planted. Coordinator Jones Wood said the program is an
application-driven process that would be cross-referenced with a list of
priorities. The in-person workshop and training would emphasize best
practices for planting trees on private property and not in public right-of-
ways.
Coordinator Jones Wood shared a map of environmental health disparities
of Tumwater census tracks. The program would prioritize those areas with
a score of 8 or more. The map was prepared by the Washington
Department of Health after the development of the Urban Forestry
Management Plan.
Boardmember Sedore commented that some of the sites are not conducive
to trees. Coordinator Jones Wood responded that staff could include other
plant species, such as prairie species. The map is reflective of the long-
standing correlation between low tree canopy and areas with a higher
concentration of people of color or poor and working class families. The
50% match requirement of the grant is tied to environmental justice and
equity. She acknowledged the need to modify the program to some degree
based on the Board’s feedback.
Retain existing trees: recent community engagement in Tumwater
suggests homeowners often remove trees because of the potential
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 11
financial impacts of a falling tree or tree limbs. Those fears can
often be addressed by conducting a tree health assessment by the
future urban forester. Selection of applicants taking advantage of
the program would be through an application to the City and
targeted outreach throughout the City to advertise the program.
Boardmember Sedore commented on the City’s regulations requiring
homeowners removing six or more trees to obtain a permit. He suggested
in those circumstances, the City might consider visiting the site and
recommending against the removal of healthy trees, as there is no incentive
if property owners have the legal right to remove up to six trees.
Coordinator Jones Wood said in terms of the future, the City’s tree and
vegetation preservation ordinance could require property owners to retain a
specific number of tree credits. The process would also help to inform
property owners not aware of the City’s tree removal permitting process.
Boardmember Sedore mentioned some neighbors who moved from Arizona
to be closer to family and removed all their trees for the property to
resemble their former property in Arizona, which speaks to the
convincibility of such a program. Coordinator Jones Wood responded that
the City does not anticipate 100% compliance in the implementation of any
programs as there will be struggles and adjustments creating lessons learned
to improve programs and processes.
Boardmember Sedore referred to City maintenance of trees. He asked about
the status of tree maintenance by City utilities. Coordinator Jones Wood
said it might be possible to utilize the utilities tree contractor for the
program. She understands the City has encountered some difficulties of
contracting with professionals to trim trees near utility lines. The City’s
maintenance is focused on street trees not obstructed by utility lines.
Coordinator Jones Wood reported the grant award is from the federal
government and administered through the River Network, a non-profit
organization. The award requires administrative processes as part of the
pass-through.
Staff anticipates the budget process will be initiated in March 2024. Some
time is available for the Board to delay a recommendation if desired until
March 2024.
MOTION: Chair Grantham moved, seconded by Boardmember Coval, to table the
inclusion of the recommendations within the budget until March 2024.
Motion carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS: The Board discussed the status of heritage tree nominations. Boardmember
Sedore reported on a proposed tree nomination of a tree near the Panda
Express Restaurant. The property owner refused to consider the nomination
TUMWATER TREE BOARD
MINUTES OF VIRTUAL MEETING
November 13, 2023 Page 12
because the owner wants to retain the flexibility associated with the future
of the tree(s).
Boardmember Sedore questioned whether the Board would have the
opportunity to review data for the tree inventory, such as identifying the
location of Garry oaks in the City. Coordinator Jones Wood advised that
the data does not include unclassified street trees under review. However,
she can download the data for sorting. Boardmember Sedore noted the
Urban Forestry Management Plan included a pie chart identifying different
tree species. He asked whether that type of information would be
incorporated within inventory data. Coordinator Jones Wood said the
City’s data could be utilized for that and other types of analysis.
Boardmember Sedore advised of the discussions that spoke to updating the
Urban Forestry Management Plan and that he is assuming staff is
continuing to collect data and updating charts in the plan. Coordinator
Jones Wood acknowledged the need for additional analysis with new
information by utilizing grant funding for the urban forester to lead the
process.
NEXT MEETING The next meeting is scheduled on Monday, December 11, 2023.
DATE:
ADJOURNMENT: With there being no further business, Chair Grantham adjourned the
meeting at 8:40 p.m.
Prepared by Valerie L. Gow, Recording Secretary/President
Puget Sound Meeting Services, psmsoly@earthlink.net
Agenda
TREE BOARD
MEETING AGENDA
Online via Zoom and In Person at
Tumwater Fire Department
Headquarters, Training Room, 311 Israel
Rd. SW, Tumwater, WA 98501
Monday, November 13, 2023
7:00 PM
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Changes to Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Tree Board Member Reports
6. Coordinator's Report
a. City-owned Urban Forest Inventory Project Update
7. Public Comment
8. Intern Street Tree Review Project
9. Proposed Non-Regulatory Incentives and Programs
10. Next Meeting Date - 12/11/2023
11. Adjourn
Meeting Information
The public are welcome to attend in person, by telephone or online via Zoom.
Watch Online
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_K1NGBRNSRw-8YCgj3nwIfg
Listen by Telephone
Call (253) 215-8782, listen for the prompts and enter the Webinar ID 854 3689 8821 and Passcode
210392.
Public Comment
The public is invited to attend the hearing and offer comment. The public may register in advance for
this webinar to provide comment: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_K1NGBRNSRw-
8YCgj3nwIfg
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
The public may also submit comments prior to the meeting by sending an email to:
AJonesWood@ci.tumwater.wa.us. Please send the comments by 1:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting.
Comments are submitted directly to the Commission/Board Members and will not be read individually
into the record of the meeting.
If you have any questions, please contact Sustainability Coordinator Alyssa Jones Wood at (360) 754-
4140 or AJonesWood@ci.tumwater.wa.us.
Post Meeting
Audio of the meeting will be recorded and later available by request, please email
CityClerk@ci.tumwater.wa.us
Accommodations
The City of Tumwater takes pride in ensuring that people with disabilities are able to take part in, and
benefit from, the range of public programs, services, and activities offered by the City. To request an
accommodation or alternate format of communication, please contact the City Clerk by calling (360)
252-5488 or email CityClerk@ci.tumwater.wa.us. For vision or hearing impaired services, please
contact the Washington State Relay Services at 7-1-1 or 1-(800)-833-6384. To contact the City’s ADA
Coordinator directly, call (360) 754-4128 or email ADACoordinator@ci.tumwater.wa.us.
What is the Tree Board?
The Tumwater Tree Board is a citizen advisory board that is appointed by and advisory to the City
Council on urban forestry issues, including drafting and revising a comprehensive tree protection plan
or ordinance, or any other tree matter. Actions by the Tree Board are not final decisions; they are Board
recommendations to the City Council who must ultimately make the final decision. If you have any
questions or suggestions on ways the Tree Board can serve you better, please contact the Community
Development Department at (360) 754-4180.
Get email alerts for Tumwater
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.