Police Community Engagement Board
Regular MeetingWebster Groves, MO · September 20, 2021
Minutes
minutes
Meeting Title
9/20/2021 6:37
Meeting called by Katy Miller
Type of meeting PCEB
Facilitator Katy Miller
Note taker Erin Klippi
Timekeeper Erin Klippi
Board Participants Dr. Scott Groesch (S.G.)
Katy Miller (K.M.)
Mayor Gerry Welch (G.W.)
Chief Dale Curtis (D.C.)
Rev. Eric Hayes (E.H.)
Kevin Sombart (K.S.)
Agenda Item 3
Review and Approval of July and August 2021 Minutes
Discussion
Conclusions Motion by Rev. Eric Hayes
Second by Dr. Scott Groesch
Approved - All
Action Items Person Deadline
Responsible
Send to City Erin Klippi 9/28/2021
Agenda Item 4
Discussion of August Meeting
Discussion Discussion was had regarding the resignation of Board Chair
Cindy Neu, following the August 2021 Board Meeting.
Conversation included, but was not limited to the following.
minutes
E.H. – Acknowledged that the Board was not necessarily
what he thought it would be when he agreed to serve as a
member.
K.M. – Questioned if that may have been a factor in Cindy’s
resignation as well.
K.S. Expressed that the “Engagement” Board was never to
be a “Review” Board and he would not feel qualified to serve
if it were.
K.M. Solicited comments from the Board regarding moving
forward and finding new Board members and leadership.
K.S. Discussed that the influence of the Board was in the
openness of discussion and the inclusion of community
members. Acknowledged he has learned much about the
Police Department policies and procedures while serving on
the board and that this learning is available to any
community member who chooses to attend the meetings.
E.H. Questioned what the Board is doing to actually engage
the community.
K.M. Agreed that engaging the whole community needs to be
a central focus moving forward.
K.S. Raised the question of whether the community is
interested in the work of the Board. He further acknowledged
the complexities of getting community member to be
engaged in all levels of local government and expressed that
government entities do not mover at the pace of the private
sector by design to keep from being “reactive”.
S.G. Expressed that he felt the Board was headed in the
right direction with a Mission and Vision Statement.
Additionally, he reiterated the need to have more activities
that actually engage with community members.
G.W. Presented the question “What is it that the Board wants
to do that the currant ordinance does not allow you to do?”
K.M. Discussed the need for some members of the
community to have a place that was perceived as safe to
discuss police interactions that could be considered unfair or
racist without the presence of members of the Police
Department, as that could be perceived as unsafe.
S.G. Expressed that he felt the issue was addressed in the
previous meeting by the City Attorney.
K.M. Speculated that the restrictions created by the
Sunshine Laws may have felt stifling to Cindy and others.
G.W. Questioned what the Board would do with any
information gathered from the community
K.M. Acknowledged that the Board has not had to face this
issue.
minutes
S.G. Previous interactions with W.U. Students were
discussed and that information regarding the whys of some
interactions with the Police Department were able to be
explained to prevent misinterpretation. Expressed that
changes to policy have been made through discussion.
K.S. Relayed information from a previous meeting with a
community group who expressed concern that some policy
changes might limit the departments ability to properly police
and that could result in an uptick in crime. Additionally, this
information expressed different areas of concern from
different areas of the community.
E.H. Reiterated the difficulty of getting the community
involved and acknowledged presenting the Community
Survey to his Congregation realized no participants.
K.M. Questioned if the City of Webster Groves
communications manager could attend a meeting to possible
give advice on more effective engagement.
G.W. Confirmed that Jenny (communications) could be
added to a future agenda.E.H. Could the Board be present
for a community function at this congregation?
G.W. Absolutely, additionally, she could speak to the F.D. to
see if they could administer COVID shots.
S.G. Piggybacking the event instead of a separate event
would be a great idea.
D.C. Discussed the options available to allow community
members to participate via Zoom anonymously.
Acknowledged the need for good communication with the
community and the Boards participation in facilitating that
communication.
K.M. and K.S. Agreed that the options proposed by D.C.
could be impactful in engaging with the community and
expressed opinions based on such.
Conclusions
Action Items Person Deadline
Responsible
Nothing Specified
Agenda Item 5
minutes
Discussion on filling the open Board positions and support
for Members
Discussion Discussion was had on the importance of recruiting a
member for the board from the Business base of Webster
Groves. Information on the process including the need for an
interview process with potential members and City Council
was provided by Mayor Welch.
Conclusions
Action Items Person Deadline
Responsible
G.W. will make announcement at Business
District meeting the following day
Agenda Item 6
Review Agenda for 9/28/2021 Meeting
Discussion Items to be added to the Agenda for 9/28/21 include but
are not limited to
The potential changes to the ordinance allowing the
PCEB
October Event(s)
Selection of ne Board Chair
Conclusions
Action Items Person Deadline
Responsible
Items to be Added to Agenda Katy 9/27/2021
minutes
Agenda Item 7
Comments from Observers
Farrell from AID expressed concern that the
Board has not has sufficient time to review the
potential changes to the Ordinance and offered
the help of the AID in drafting revisions based
on recommendations provided by the City
Attorney in the August 2021 meeting.
Resulting from comments D.C. will send a copy
of the AID document (dated 5/14/2021) to Erin
Klippi who will highlight areas of concern as
presented by the City of Webster Groves
Attorney in the August 2021 meeting. D.C. will
include notes from the City Attorney.
Farrell from AID will condense the original
document to a list form for the next meeting.
Agenda Item 8
Adjourn 7:39 pm
Agenda
Due to the need for members to attend virtually, the Police Community
Engagement Board Meeting will be available to the public only via
teleconference. Instructions on listening through your phone or computer to the
teleconference will be available prior to the meeting at
webstergroves.org/teleconference.
[All public comments shall be made via email kfmpceb@gmail.com no later than
2 p.m. on September 20, 2021 in order to be included in the meeting minutes.
Please include “Remarks of Visitors” in the subject line.]
Webster Groves
Police Community Engagement Board Meeting
Monday, September 20, 2021
6:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Review & Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting
4. Discussion of August Meeting
5. Discussion on filling open Board positions and support for Members
6. Review Agenda for 9/28/21 Meeting
7. Adjourn
Individuals who require an accommodation (sign language,
interpreter, listening devices, etc.) to participate in the meeting
should contact the City Clerk at 314-963-5318 (fax number 314-
963-7561) or Relay Missouri at 1-800-735-2966 (TDD) at least two
working days prior to the meeting.
Get email alerts for Webster Groves
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.