City Council Agendas & Packets
Regular MeetingEast Grand Forks, MN · July 23, 2024
Minutes
APPROVED MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION
CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS
TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2024 – 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
The Work Session of the East Grand Forks City Council for Tuesday, July 23, 2024 was called to order
by Council President Olstad at 5:00 P.M.
CALL OF ROLL:
On a Call of Roll the following members of the East Grand Forks City Council were present: Mayor Steve
Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council Members
Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale Helms, Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Staff Present: Karla Anderson, Finance Director; Nancy Ellis, City Planner; Ron Galstad, City Attorney;
Paul Gorte, Economic Development Director; Michael Hedlund, Police Chief, Charlotte Helgeson,
Library Director; Reid Huttunen, City Administrator; Jeremy King, Parks and Recreation Superintendent;
Megan Nelson, City Clerk; and Jason Stordahl, Public Works Director.
DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM:
The Council President Determined a Quorum was present.
1. Request to Fill Vacant Position – Jason Stordahl
Mr. Stordahl told the Council that Mr. Cletus Landa would be done as of August 30th after almost 40 years
of working for the city. He asked to fill the vacancy and start the hiring process. There were no questions.
This item will be referred to a City Council Meeting for action.
2. Request Input for Cannabis Ordinance – Reid Huttunen
Mr. Huttunen told the Council a work group had been formed to work through the rules and regulations
from the State, more information was needed from the State to complete this process, but the City was
able to control zoning and where the business types could be located. He explained how the State would
be setting the registration fees so the group had spent its time reviewing zoning, buffer zones for areas
around schools could be up to 1000 feet, and the buffer zones for day care centers, a residential treatment
facility, or an attraction such as a public park or a place used regularly by minors could have a buffer zone
up to 500 feet. He stated if they used the largest buffer zones these businesses would be zoned out of the
commercial areas, the work group’s suggestion would be to allow the retail business in the commercial
areas instead of the industrial areas because the commercial areas were set up for traffic, so the use would
be allowed in downtown commercial and highway commercial zones utilizing a 750 foot buffer zone from
schools and a 300 foot buffer from a park or child day care center. He added most of the other businesses
would be in the industrial park.
Work Session July 23, 2024
Council President Olstad asked about the maps that were included in the packet. Mr. Huttunen said the
maps showed the buffer zones that were 750 feet from schools and 300 feet from parks or a day care
center. Council President Olstad said that buffer would only allow one side of Demers Avenue. Mayor
Gander commented how he liked the way this had been laid out and was being done in an orderly way.
Mr. Huttunen stated the State would be registering the businesses and there was a requirement for one of
these businesses for every 12,500 in population which would be approximately three businesses for Polk
County. He added the City could set a minimum or not, or start with one business to understand the
market and demand because it would be hard to limit businesses if they started out with no limit. Council
member Larson asked to consider starting with two businesses because only having one would be a
monopoly. Council member Peterson said she liked the idea of having two businesses because of how
they operate. Mayor Gander said he would like to start with one business, see how things go, and roll out
a second business in about six months. Discussion followed about having a buffer between the businesses
and how they could allow one business in each commercial area.
Mr. Galstad stated there were mezzo and micro businesses that did have a retail aspect to them, he
submitted questions to the State regarding these businesses, and was still waiting on answers about what
limitations or restrictions that could be put on those businesses. Council member Vetter asked if they
limit this to one business, how would they decide who got the license. Council member Pokrzywinski
asked about the selection process. Mr. Huttunen informed everyone the business would first have to apply
with the State, the State would review the application, a retailer would reach out to the City about locating
in the city, and the business would not have to have a location picked out. He continued saying the City
would have 30 days to review the license, multiple registrations could be received, and there were a few
different ways of moving forward such as a lottery system or a first come, first serve system. He added
he spoke with someone recently about if the area became oversaturated with these businesses none of
them would be profitable. Council member Pokrzywinski said his initial thought was to have two
locations but could agree to starting with one and reviewing at 6 months to consider a second location.
Council member Vetter asked how they would evaluate things at 6 months. Council member
Pokrzywinski said he did not have the answer but made some suggestions on what could be used.
Discussion followed about how there were age limits on cannabis purchases, annual compliance checks
would be conducted, and driving impaired would be based upon officer observations because there was
nothing currently to test the level of concentration.
Council member Larson said he was concerned about having only one location, business would eventually
slow down, but they have not addressed how to select a business, so it could be challenging, and they
should determine what could be reviewed. Mr. Galstad reminded the Council the State licensed the
businesses, the City would determine the amount of licenses, and someone applying for a license would
have a benefit if they had a criminal record from a marijuana conviction. Council member Larson said it
was frustrating there was not more local control. Mr. Galstad stated again he had sent some questions to
the State regarding the micro and mezzo businesses, if the retail for those businesses could be restricted
and he was still waiting on answers. Council member Vetter said there should be research done on how
liquor licenses determined when the number of the licenses were restricted. Council member Peterson
commented how the there should not be retail businesses located in the industrial park. Mr. Huttunen said
the micro and mezzo businesses would be located in the industrial park, not the retail location for those
businesses, and the City was waiting on a response from the State. Council President Olstad said he would
prefer having two businesses and it could be revisited later.
Council Vice-President Riopelle said the proposed buffers restricted locations to one side of Demers
Avenue and it should be allowed on both sides. Mr. Huttunen said it was the same along Highway 220
2|Page
Work Session July 23, 2024
and the buffer zone could be changed to allow for both sides. He added that this would just be for the full
cannabis stores and the current stores that were selling THC would still be allowed to do so in their current
locations. Mr. Galstad reminded the Council the limitations or buffer zones were not required but they
were trying to limit this from children but things could be opened up on the corridors. He added that
nothing could be located in residential areas. Mayor Gander said many people did not want these
businesses in the city and they were trying to do this in an orderly way. Council member Helms said he
did not want these businesses, but he would like to see the 750 foot buffer zone. Council member Larson
said they could allow the corridors. Discussion followed about how the only way to prohibit an area was
by buffer zones so buffer zone would need to be adjusted to allow certain areas and how the operating
hours should be set from 10am to 9pm for each day of the week which was allowed by the State.
This item will be brought back to a future meeting.
3. Request Direction on Planned Use of General Fund Reserves and 2023 Surplus – Reid
Huttunen and Karla Anderson
Mr. Huttunen stated the handout was a summary of the building maintenance fund. He explained there
was a surplus from 2023, if the 2024 budget was collected and spent as it was budgeted, this would put
the fund balance reserve at 55% at the end of 2024. He reminded the Council the 2024 budget included
$174,000 being spent from the reserves. He added the State recommendation was to have a reserve of
35% up to 50% of expenditures so the 5% of the 55% would total approximately $675,000. He said staff
was working on the proposed 2025 budget which would be brought forward at an August work session
and asked if the Council would want to spend, save, or give some direction on how to use some of that
funding. He asked for input and if there were questions.
Council President Olstad asked if health insurance was determined. Mr. Huttunen said they should have
that information in August. Council President Olstad stated he would like to see a 3% tax levy for 2025,
reserves at 50%, and asked what had been delayed and how the greensite needed some work. Mayor
Gander said if they had a 3% levy increase that could be close to almost no increase to the residents, the
City was running lean, the Ad Hoc committee did a good job, and reviewed history of tax levies.
Discussion followed about how there was a -1% tax levy in 2012, how $743,000 was being carried over
from 2023, and it was unknown where things would end up for 2024. More discussion followed about
how the back portion of the greensite needed to be addressed because of how rough the ground was, how
concrete could be added, how there are many issues with the gate, and a change could be made to charge
everyone for the greensite and not have cards anymore.
This will be brought back to a future meeting.
ADJOURN:
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HELMS, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER LARSON, TO ADJOURN THE JULY 23, 2024 WORK SESSION OF THE EAST
GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL AT 6:09 P.M.
Voting Aye: Peterson, Vetter, Pokrzywinski, Riopelle, Helms, Olstad, and Larson.
Voting Nay: None.
_______________________________________________
Megan Nelson, City Clerk
3|Page
Agenda
AGENDA
OF THE WORK SESSION
CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS
TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2024 – 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
CALL OF ROLL:
DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM:
1. Request to Fill Vacant Position – Jason Stordahl
2. Request Input for Cannabis Ordinance – Reid Huttunen
3. Request Direction on Planned Use of General Fund Reserves and 2023 Surplus – Reid
Huttunen and Karla Anderson
ADJOURN:
Upcoming Meetings
Council Meeting – Tuesday, August 6, 2024 – Council Chambers – 5:00 PM
Work Session – Tuesday, August 13, 2024 – Council Chambers – 5:00 PM
The meeting on August 13th will be done by 6:00pm due to the Primary Election.
Council Meeting – Tuesday, August 20, 2024 – Council Chambers – 5:00 PM
Work Session – Tuesday, August 27, 2024 – Training Chambers – 5:00 PM
Individuals with disabilities, language barriers or other needs who plan to attend the meeting and will need special accommodations
should contact Nancy Ellis, ADA Coordinator at (218)-773-2208. Please contact us at least 48 hours before the meeting to give our
staff adequate time to make arrangements. Also, materials can be provided in alternative formats for people with disabilities or with
limited English proficiency (LEP) by contacting the ADA Coordinator (218)-773-2208 five (5) days prior to the meeting.
1
AGENDA ITEM #__1_____
Request for Council Action
Date: 7/18/2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council
Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council members Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale Helms,
Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Cc: File
From: Jason Stordahl-Public Works Director
RE: Filling Vacant Position
Background: After nearly 40 years of service with the City’s Public Works Department Cletus Landa is
retiring August 30th, 2024. This will leave a vacancy within our Department which we like to fill as soon
as possible.
Recommendation: Approve Staff to start the hiring process to fill vacant Truck Driver position.
-1-
2
AGENDA ITEM #_2______
Request for Council Action
Date: July 23, 2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council
Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council members Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale
Helms, Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Cc: File
From: Reid Huttunen, City Administrator
RE: Cannabis Planning: Seeking input for Ordinance writing guidance
Background:
The States Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) has released a Guide for Local Governments on
Adult-Use Cannabis, as well as a Model Ordinance for local governments. That Guide can be found at
this link: A Guide for Local Minnesota Governments on Adult-Use Cannabis (mn.gov)
It has become more clear what the role of Local Governments is through the Cannabis rule making
process. The following are areas that Local Government can set rules for cannabis by ordinance.
1. Ordinances pertaining to:
a. Zoning
b. Time, Place, Manner of business operations
2. Local Approval review process for MN State Licensing
a. Certification of compliance with zoning ordinances
b. Retail Business Registration
3. Compliance Checks – age verification and compliance with local ordinances.
City Staff have formed a cannabis work group to review the above areas and have reached a point
where we would like to check in with the City Council as a whole, to gather feedback on some of the
proposed rules we are discussing. Below is a summary of areas that are within local control and
questions that we’d like City Council and public input on.
ZONING
MN State Law for Cannabis does not restrict how a Local Government sets its zoning designations for
cannabis businesses, except that the municipality may prohibit the operation of a cannabis business
within 1,000 feet of a school, or 500 feet of a day care, residential treatment facility, or an attraction
within a public park that is regularly used by minors, including playgrounds and athletic fields.
1. The City is proposing the following Zoning and Land Use regulations for Cannabis Businesses.
a. All Business types would be prohibited within all Zoning Districts if they are located:
i. within 750 Feet of a School
ii. Within 300 feet of a Licensed Childcare Center/Facility, Residential Treatment
facility, or public park, playground, or athletic field.
3
AGENDA ITEM #_______
b. Business License Types and proposed Zoning District
BUSINESS TYPE ZONING AREA PERMITTED
Retail location Downtown Commercial and Highway Commercial
Microbusiness Light Industrial and General Industrial
Mezzobusiness Light Industrial and General Industrial
Cultivator Light Industrial and General Industrial
Manufacturer Light Industrial and General Industrial
Wholesaler Light Industrial and General Industrial
Transporter Light Industrial and General Industrial
Testing Facility Light Industrial and General Industrial
Delivery Service Highway Commercial, Light Industrial, General
Industrial
Medical Cannabis Combo Bus. Light Industrial and General Industrial
Low Potency Hemp Manufacturer Light Industrial and General Industrial
Low Potency Hemp Retailer Downtown Commercial and Highway
Commercial
ZONING BUFFER MAPS ARE INCLUDED AS AN ATTACHMENT FOR REVIEW
ZONING QUESTIONS:
1. Do you support the proposed restriction that no Cannabis business shall be located within
750 of a school?
2. Do you support the proposed restriction that no Cannabis business shall be located within
300 feet of a Licensed Childcare Center/Facility, Residential Treatment facility, or public park,
playground, or athletic field.
3. Do you support the idea that retail sale locations for Cannabis be in the Downtown
Commercial or Highway Commercial district?
4. Do you support the idea that any cultivation, or manufacturing of cannabis and cannabis
products be located within the Light Industrial or General Industrial district?
BUSINESS REGISTRATION
1. By Ordinance, the municipality may limit the number of licensed cannabis retailers to no
fewer than One (1) per every 12,500 residents. This means the City of East Grand Forks will
be required to allow at least one (1) retail business license. It can set limitations to the total
number of retail licenses allowed.
a. How many retail business locations should the City of East Grand Forks allow?
One
Two
Three to five
More than five
4
AGENDA ITEM #_______
2. If the Municipality wishes to place a limitation on the number of retailers allowed within the
city, The City will need to define the process for how it will select the retail holder, if more
than the allowed number of license holders apply. A few options for this process include:
a. Use of a Lottery
b. A first Come/First Serve model
c. A rolling basis
d. Others
If the City determines it will limit the number of retail licenses, how should it
determine which retailer is selected for a license?
3. The municipality shall require a Cannabis Business Registration, by ordinance. Fees for these
registrations are set by State Law as listed below.
a. An initial retail registration fee shall not exceed $500 or half the amount of an initial
state license fee under Minn. Stat. 342.11, whichever is less
b. A renewal retail registration fee shall not exceed $1,000 or half the amount of a
renewal state license fee under Minn. Stat. 342.11, whichever is less
BUSINESS REGULATIONS/RESTRICTIONS:
4. By State Law, the municipality may adopt an ordinance limiting hours of operation to the
hours between 10 a.m. and 9 p.m., seven days a week. State statute prohibits the sale of
cannabis between 2 a.m. and 8 a.m., Monday through Saturday, and between 2 a.m. and 10
a.m. on Sundays
a. Our Cannabis Work Group is recommending the following business hours:
Monday through Sunday: 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Do you agree with the above proposed cannabis business hours of operation?
Recommendation:
No recommendations at this time. Seeking City Council and public input on the above-described business
parameters and zoning.
Enclosures:
Cannabis – Proposed Zoning List
East Grand Forks Zoning Map
Maps showing impact of proposed buffer zones
5
Downtown Highway Light General
Business License Type Definition Commercial Commercial Industrial Industrial
Retailer Sell Cannabis and hemp prodcuts to customers & patients Yes Yes No No
Microbusiness Cultivate & Package for resale. May Operate one retail location No No Yes Yes
Mezzobusiness Cultivate & Package for resale. May Operate up to three retail locations No No Yes Yes
Cultivate and Package for sale to another retail business.
Cultivator *Indoor Cultivation only within City Limits No No Yes Yes
Manufacturer manufacture products for sale to another retail business No No Yes Yes
Wholesaler Purchase and/or sell immature cannabis products to/from another cannabis license No No Yes Yes
Transporter Transport plants/seedlings to licensed business No No Yes Yes
Testing Facility obtain and test immature plants/seedlings from licensed cannabis businesses No No Yes Yes
Event Organizer Organize a temporary event lasting no more than 4 days
Delivery Service purchase from retailers with retail endorsement to deliver to customers No Yes Yes Yes
Medical Cannabis Combination Business Cultivate and manufacture medical cannabis. Operate one retail location No No Yes Yes
Low Potentcy Hemp Edible Manufacturer Manufacture low potency edibles for consumer sale No No Yes Yes
Lower Potency Hemp Edible Retailer sell lower potency edibles to customers Yes Yes No No
Yes = Permitted Zone & Land Use
*Zoning District buffers for all business types. No = Prohibited Zone & Land Use
No closer than 750 Feet from any school
No closer than 300 feet from any childcare center/facility, residential treatment facility or public park, playground, or athletic field regularly used by minors.
6
East Grand Forks Zoning Map
State Hwy 220
23rd St NW
Central Ave
8th Ave NW
Riv
er
Rd
NW
5th Ave NE
US Hwy 2
DeM
2nd Ave NE
ers
Ave
Bus
Hw
y2
C-1: Downtown District
C-2: Highway Commercial District
I-1: Light Industrial District
I-2: General Industrial District
PUD: Planned Unit Development
Rhinehart Dr SE
R-1: Single-Family Residential District
R-2: Multi-Family Residential District 13th St SE
R-3: High Density Residential District Greenway Blvd SE
UER: Urban Expansion Reserve District
glan
City Limits Flood Protection System
By
d
Rd
Water
-
SE
0 0.5 1
Miles Created: October 26, 2021
7
Sherlock Park
Sacred Heart
School
³
These data are provided on an "AS-IS"
Downtown Commercial C-1 with buffers basis, without warranty of any type,
expressed or implied, including but
not limited to any warranty as to their
8 performance, merchantability, or fitness
7/1/2024 for any particular purpose.
Tri-Valley
Head Start
EGF Civic Center
Senior & Itt's WIlliams Park
High
³
These data are provided on an "AS-IS"
Highway Commercial C-2 with buffers_map2 basis, without warranty of any type,
expressed or implied, including but
along Hwy 220 not limited to any warranty as to their
9 performance, merchantability, or fitness
7/1/2024 for any particular purpose.
Stauss
Park
Riverside
Christian
School
Sacred Heart
School
LaFave Park
³
These data are provided on an "AS-IS"
Highway Commercial Bus 2 C-2 with buffers basis, without warranty of any type,
expressed or implied, including but
along Business Hwy 2 10
not limited to any warranty as to their
performance, merchantability, or fitness
7/1/2024 for any particular purpose.
Douglas Place
Residential
Treatment
Facility
³
These data are provided on an "AS-IS"
Industrial Zoning I-1 and I-2 with res facility buffer basis, without warranty of any type,
expressed or implied, including but
not limited to any warranty as to their
11 performance, merchantability, or fitness
7/1/2024 for any particular purpose.
AGENDA ITEM #_3______
Request for Council Action
Date: July 23, 2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council
Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council members Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale
Helms, Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Cc: File
From: Reid Huttunen, City Administrator and Karla Anderson, Finance Director
RE: Requesting direction on planned use of General Fund reserves and 2023 surplus
Background:
City staff are preparing our first draft of the 2025 Budget and plan to bring an initial budget proposal to City
Council for review in August. As discussed during the 2023 Audit review:
- General Fund Balance increased $743,627 as of December 31, 2023.
- Total General Fund Balance $7,244,930.00 as of December 31, 2023.
City Policy and Office of State Auditor recommendation is the City to maintain an unrestricted fund balance of
35 to 50 percent of fund operating revenues or no less than five months of regular general fund operating
expenditures. With the assumption that we will collect and spend as budgeted in 2024, the 2024 General Fund
Balance would be at 55% of Revenue and Expenditures.
- Projected Total Revenue: $13,327,897 5% of Revenues = $666,394.85
- Projected Total Expenditures: $13,501,961 5% of Expenditures = $675,098.05
City Staff are preparing the 2025 budget and considering potential Capital Improvement projects to include in
our budget request.
How would City Council like to see us handle our General Fund balance and 2023 surplus? City staff have
discussed the below considerations as potential ideas/options:
- Apply a portion of the balance toward Capital Improvement projects:
o Examples could include: Fire Station 2 renovation, Parks & Recreation Improvement projects,
Industrial Park improvements, etc.
- Apply a portion of the balance to 2025 Budget
- Save a higher than 50% balance in our general fund
Recommendation:
No recommendation from staff. Seeking input and direction to help City Staff take the next steps in preparing
its 2025 budget proposal.
Enclosures:
2024 Budget brief updated with December 31, 2023 fund balance
12
2024
The City of East Grand Forks' budget reflects the
CITY OF
EAST GRAND FORKS
goals developed by City Council, and provides a
blueprint for City services. The budget not only
PROPOSED GENERAL FUND
serves as a financial plan, but also as a tool for
accountability. BUDGET BRIEF
EAST GRAND FORKS
VISIONING GOALS
Plan for projects within Fund Balance
2024 BUDGET SUMMARY
South End Bridge Beginning Fund Balance:
$7,244,930
Local Sales Tax for Recreation Facilities Projected Total Revenue:
$13,327,897
Restore and Maintain Trust
Projected Total Expenditures:
$13,501,961
Strengthen City/School Partnership Bond
Estimated End of Year Fund Balance:
$7,369,901
Upgrade City Facilities & Streets Fund Balance as % of Revenue 55%
Fund Balance as % of Expenditures 55%
13
2024 TOTAL REVENUE
0.9% 0.3% REVENUES
2.0%
Property Tax Levy $6,930,081
10.9% Property Tax Levy Franchise & Other Taxes $1,567,684
Franchise & Other Taxes Licenses & Permits $116,275
Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental $2,839,577
Charges for Services $1,451,180
Intergovernmental
21.3% Fines & Forfeits $118,000
52.0% Charges for Services
Other Revenues $38,500
Fines & Forfeits Other Financing Sources $266,600
Other Revenues
0.9%
Other Financing Sources TOTAL REVENUES $13,327,897
11.8%
2024 TOTAL EXPENSES
Current Expenditures Capital Outlay & Other Uses
1.2% 3.4% General Government
2.3% Public Safety 11.7%
6.3% 12.2%
22.1% Public Safety
Public Works Public Works
17.3% Recreation & Culture
Receration & Culture 27.6%
9.0% Other Expenditures
Community Debt Service
43.1%
14.2% Development Other Financing Uses
Library 23.6% 6.0%
Senior Center
Current Expenditures Capital Outlay & Other Uses
General Government $1,527,950 Public Safety $116,500
Public Safety $5,388,142 Public Works $275,000
Public Works $1,772,297 Recreation & Culture $60,000
Receration & Culture $2,168,822 Other Expenditures $235,000
Community Development $288,963 Debt Service $90,000
Library $785,008 Other Financing Uses $220,794
Senior Center $146,036
Other Expenditures $427,009 TOTAL EXPENSES $13,501,521
14
GENERAL FUND EXPENSES
SUMMARY OF CITY SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER
Pavement Management & Infrastructure Road & Street Maintenance Planning & Reviewing City Infrastructures
Concrete Repair Snow Removal
PARKS & RECREATION
PUBLIC SAFETY Maintenance of City pool, parks, outdoor rinks
Emergency Notifications & Preparedness Maintenance of City arenas
Fire Services Police Services Red River State Recreational Area Campground
Recreational Activities
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Greenway & Trail maintenance
Building Permits & Inspections Planning & Zoning
Economic Development LEGAL SERVICES
Legal Consultation & Advice
FINANCE Representation for the City During Litigation
Management of City Fees Taxes & Licensing Preparation of Legal Documents
Audits & Financial Statements Budgets Preparation of Legal Documents
LIBRARY
LEADERSHIP & ADMINISTRATION Library Activities Library Collection
General Oversight City Council Support Library
City Manager's Office Strategic Planning SENIOR CENTER
City Clerk Municipal Election Senior Activities
COMMUNITY TAX BREAKDOWN
PROPERTY TAX FOR EXAMPLE
Estimated Market Home Value: $237,500
Property owners residing in the East Grand Forks City limits:
Property tax statements consists of taxes collected for Polk County, Total Property Tax: $3,474
City of EGF, ISD 595 Voter Approved, ISD 595, Watershed, Northwest
Regional Development Commission (NWRDC), and Ambulance. BREAKDOWN OF 2023 PROPERTY TAX:
City of EGF 48.00% NWRDC $4.33 0.12%
Polk County
27.61% Ambulance $11.78 0.34%
16.36%
Watershed $81.74 2.35%
ISD 595
ISD 595 Voter Approved $181.16 5.21%
ISD 595 5.21%
Voter Approved ISD 595 $568.25 16.36%
Watershed 2.35%
Polk County $959.05 27.61%
0.34%
Ambulance City of EGF $1,667.69 48.00%
NWRDC 0.12% $3,474.00 100.00%
15
Get email alerts for East Grand Forks
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.