Planning Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · August 9, 2022
Minutes
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AFF2BCC-B9C6-4D9B-9ED7-79956C0AC436
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MONTEREY
August 09, 2022
7:00 PM – 11:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER
AND ZOOMGOV TELECONFERENCE
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Commissioners Present: Fletcher, Brassfield*, Dawson*, Freeman, Latasa, Millich*
Commissioners Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Community Development Director Cole, City Attorney Davi*,
Recording Secretary Cleary
* Participated remotely by videoconference
This meeting was held with a combination of in-person and teleconference attendance pursuant
to the Ralph M. Brown Act, Calif. Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(C), and the Monterey
City Council’s Resolution authorizing virtual participation in public meetings given the COVID-
19 pandemic.
CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chair Fletcher called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. and Recording Secretary Cleary
explained to the public how to participate and provide public comment during the meeting.
1. Meeting Procedures
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
2. Consider Recommending an Ordinance to the City Council Repealing and Replacing City
Code Chapter 38 Article 17 Section 112.4 Related to Wireless Communication Facilities
Exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Sections 15305 and 15308, Classes 5 and 8)
ACTION: Continued to the September 13, 2022 Planning Commission Meeting
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Community Development Director Cole introduced the item, provided background information
regarding the Wireless Ordinance process and status, and answered Commissioner questions.
Gail Karish, Legal Consultant from Best Best & Krieger, provided further details regarding recent
legal proceedings involving wireless facilities. Ms. Karish, Ms. Cole, and City Attorney Davi
answered Commissioner questions throughout the presentations.
Commissioner Latasa requested a description of the Wireless Subcommittee’s membership.
Ms. Cole supplied details.
Commissioner Millich asked if the City could ban 5G poles in residential areas that are high risk
of fire and unable to get fire insurance. Ms. Karish explained the Public Utilities Commission
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AFF2BCC-B9C6-4D9B-9ED7-79956C0AC436
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday August 09, 2022
sets safety requirements for installations of communications and power infrastructure and there
are orders addressed by them that specify what a safe structure is.
Commissioner Latasa inquired about Ms. Karish’s work with the City of Carmel and noticing
requirements. Ms. Karish provided information. Ms. Davi added that the City of Monterey has
notice provisions in the City Code that are applicable to all Use Permits.
Commissioner Freeman asked clarifying questions regarding aesthetics of colocation. Ms.
Karish explained colocation is often preferred to maximize use of existing antennas rather than
adding more sites and specified that requirements are in place to ensure utility poles are safe.
Ms. Cole provided background information regarding the Subcommittee’s thoughts on this.
Commissioner Freeman inquired further. Ms. Cole explained the goal in the current proposal is
to utilize existing poles.
Commissioner Brassfield asked questions regarding logistics of potential prohibitions. Ms.
Karish explained State Law says the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is the only
agency to establish standards for safe Radio Frequency (RF) emission and at a local level the
City can ensure compliance with existing FCC guidelines and added that local governments
cannot regulate based on concerns for RF emissions while applications demonstrate
compliance with existing FCC standards.
Commissioner Brassfield asked if there is a cumulative effect of colocation and if the City could
effectively object to the number of cell towers in various areas. Ms. Karish described limitations
and potential solutions associated with this idea.
Public Comments
Christy Hollenbeck claimed the draft ordinance is not strong enough to protect the City and
recommended wireless carriers be required to prove significant gaps in services.
Jeanna Jett suggested residents do not want wireless cell facilities in residential communities
and urged the City to hire a new law firm as the Subcommittee’s work is outdated.
Pat Venza expressed confusion with the direction of the ordinance, requested answers to
comments and questions submitted by the Monterey Vista Neighborhood Association, and
suggested denying applications that do not prove a significant gap in coverage exists.
Barbara Moore requested that Staff go through the draft ordinance to explain where it differs
from the original and provide an analysis describing why recommendations were not followed.
Marta Kraftzeck asked the Commission not to recommend the ordinance as it needs the
strongest language possible to deter cell towers near schools and residents.
Former Wireless Subcommittee member Susan Nine said Ms. Karish’s analysis differed from
those of other attorneys and suggested Carmel required a significant gap analysis. Ms. Nine
supplied reasons why wireless facilities should not be allowed in residential neighborhoods.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday August 09, 2022
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AFF2BCC-B9C6-4D9B-9ED7-79956C0AC436
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday August 09, 2022
Nina Beety suggested Staff has not provided the existing ordinance and requested the Planning
Commission not to approve this version because ADA section A.2 is missing, the redline version
was provided in black and white, and fair housing issues have not been addressed.
Ray Meyers urged the Planning Commission to reject the ordinance, explained wireless
regulations have remained the same since 1996 despite modern technology changes, and
highlighted needs for evaluation methods, safety verification, graphics showing radiation in two-
dimensional view, measurements of EMF after installation, and random inspections to verify
compliance.
Laurie Putnam claimed conditions are not monitored at a cell tower in the New Monterey
neighborhood and suggested investigation to ensure compliance, urging the Commission to find
more ways to monitor sites after permits are issued.
Jean Rasch, MVNA president, suggested citizens need the advocacy of the Planning
Commission, more dialogue, and responses to the Neighborhood’s submitted comments. Ms.
Rasch asked the Commission not to approve the draft ordinance as MVNA concerns have not
yet been addressed.
Vice Chair Fletcher called a five-minute recess and reopened the meeting at 9:16 p.m.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Latasa said the public members of the Subcommittee seemed disappointed and
agreed that nothing was provided showing what recommendations were rejected and why.
Commissioner Brassfield said MVNA has been consistent, and the repeat comments were
overwhelming, and suggested looking at each recommendation to compare them with the
existing and proposed ordinances.
Commissioner Millich asserted that City Attorney staff is doing their best to withstand legal
challenge and suggested that tying fire hazard areas to global warming and health and safety is
a justified action. Commissioner Brassfield agreed and suggested that when changes are made
there should be an explanation.
Commissioner Freeman claimed the public comments downgraded the proposed ordinance,
asked why the Subcommittee’s recommendations were not followed, and suggested an analysis
of the Subcommittee’s ordinance versus staff recommendation to explain which changes the
public were interested in and weighing whether they could be added to the ordinance.
Commissioner Latasa spoke in favor of providing an analysis for the public. Vice Chair Fletcher
agreed, citing the need to be sure everyone understands clearly. Ms. Davi provided further
details regarding the process and legal limitations.
Commissioner Millich suggested providing a comparison of the Subcommittee draft ordinance
and the current proposed draft to exhibit what can or cannot be included and why. Vice Chair
Fletcher agreed.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday August 09, 2022
3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AFF2BCC-B9C6-4D9B-9ED7-79956C0AC436
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday August 09, 2022
Commissioner Millich said there are mistakes in the Agenda Packet. Ms. Cole requested an
email showing which spelling and grammatical errors need corrections.
Commissioner Latasa motioned to continue the item with conditions to return with a point-by-
point comparison between the two drafts, and Commissioner Freeman seconded the motion.
Commissioner Millich requested adding a requirement to review the City’s ability to deny or
oppose 5G poles based on a lack of fire insurance in a high fire hazard area.
Commissioner Latasa amended the motion to include Commissioner Millich’s suggestion.
Discussion followed regarding specifics of the information requested to be included and why.
Ms. Cole restated the amended motion for clarity. Commissioner Freeman seconded the
amended motion.
Ms. Cleary stated a date of continuance was not determined and advised selecting a date certain
or tabling instead of continuing the item. Ms. Cole suggested continuing the item to September
13, 2022. The motion maker and seconder agreed to add this date to the motion for continuance.
On a motion by Commissioner Latasa, seconded by Commissioner Freeman and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission continued the item to a date certain of September 13,
2022 to allow staff to do an analysis of the Subcommittee draft in comparison to the current
proposal to respond to recommendations on a point-by-point basis and explain which
recommendations were added to the ordinance and why:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Fletcher, Brassfield, Dawson, Freeman, Latasa,
Millich
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Commissioner Brassfield suggested answering questions submitted for public comment. Ms.
Cole suggested the Commission typically combs through comments and recommends what
Staff should focus on and requested direction toward policy issues to explore in more detail.
Commissioner Brassfield offered to organize comments submitted for the August 09, 2022
meeting into a list for Staff reference.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Commissioner Brassfield asked how the Wireless Subcommittee’s checklist is working. Ms. Cole
said the Planning Commission received the checklist in 2019 with a goal to review the checklist
for compliance after the ordinance is completed to make sure it complies with the new ordinance.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday August 09, 2022
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9AFF2BCC-B9C6-4D9B-9ED7-79956C0AC436
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday August 09, 2022
4. Planning Office Update
Update received.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:58 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Kimberly Cole Vice Chair
Community Development Director Planning Commission
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday August 09, 2022
5
Agenda
Commissioners
Planning Commission
Daniel Fletcher, Vice Chair
Amended Meeting Agenda Mike Brassfield
Mike Dawson
Sandra Freeman
Tuesday, August 9, 2022 Terry Latasa
Council Chamber Stephen Millich
and ZoomGov Teleconference 7:00 PM – 11:00 PM
Monterey, California
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Pursuant to California Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(A)
and (C) and the Monterey City Council’s resolution authorizing virtual participation in
public meetings given the COVID-19 pandemic, meetings of the Monterey City Council
and its Boards, Commissions, and Committees are being conducted with a hybrid format
providing both in-person and virtual (electronic and telephone) participation to promote
social distancing and protect the health and safety of attendees.
Details for Public Participation in this Meeting:
BEFORE THIS MEETING, members of the public may submit comment(s) to
planning@monterey.org until ½ hour before the start of the meeting. These messages are
shared with the Planning Commission prior to the start of the meeting but are not read
aloud. All comments become part of the record and are made available online at
monterey.org/submitted-comments.
DURING THIS MEETING, members of the public may attend and participate:
In-person (location listed above), with masks strongly encouraged for all, regardless
of vaccination status, except those who are younger than two years old or have a
medical condition that prevents wearing a mask.
Online via ZoomGov Webinar live (no time delay):
o On a computer or smartphone: https://monterey-org.zoomgov.com/j/1619908039
o Or join by telephone: Dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (Campbell, Calif.)
or 646-828-7666 (New York, NY). If one number does not work, please try another.
Enter Webinar ID: 161 990 8039 #
If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #
To “raise your hand” dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute.
Need more help or seeking guidance on making public comments? Read our
ZoomGov Meeting Instructions.
This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (10
second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay).
FIELD TRIP
The Planning Commission will not conduct a field trip to review the August 09, 2022 PC
meeting agenda. For more information, call (831) 646-3885. Date Posted: August 05,
2022
CALL TO ORDER
1. Meeting Procedures
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes
on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning Commission and
which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention
of the Commission may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of
explanation to the Commission, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are
taken during the afternoon session and continued at the evening session. Individuals
may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session, but not both.
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARINGS are required by law for certain actions. You are welcome to offer
your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time
allocated to each speaker. Project representation is encouraged.
2. Consider Recommending an Ordinance to the City Council Repealing and
Replacing City Code Chapter 38 Article 17 Section 112.4 Related to Wireless
Communication Facilities Exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Sections 15305 and
15308, Classes 5 and 8)
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
COMMISSIONERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Commissioner may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to
the body at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a
request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of
meetings and study sessions.
3. Planning Office Update
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT — The general policy of the Planning Commission is that the Afternoon Session
will end no later than 5:30 p.m. and the Evening Session will end no later than 11:00 p.m. Any
public agenda items that have not been completed within the designated adjournment time may
be formally extended by the Commission, or continued to the next regularly scheduled Planning
Commission Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning
Office, or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date
of the meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Commission on any Agenda items. The Chair
will formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during
"Consent Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the
action on that item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is
appreciated.
Information distributed to the Commission at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A
copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Planning Commission decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the
decision on forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day
falls on a weekend or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the
holiday or weekend. An appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning
Office at (831) 646-3885.
Planning Commission Meetings are cable cast live and videotaped for replay on Monterey's
Government Access Channel 25 by Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP).
Planning Commission
8/9/2022 4:00:00 PM
2
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
FAX: (831) 646-3793
Email: suggest@monterey.org
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-
3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related
assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS
offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use
CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Planning Commission
8/9/2022 4:00:00 PM
3
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.