Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Regular MeetingMountain View, CA · February 24, 2021
Minutes
City of Mountain View
Minutes
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Wednesday, February 24, 2021 6:30 PM Video Conference with No Physical Meeting Location
This meeting was conducted in accordance with State of California Executive Order N-29-20,
dated March 17, 2020. All members of the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee participated
in the meeting by video conference, with no physical meeting location.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Lada Adamic called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Staff members present: Transportation Manager Ria Hutabarat Lo, Transportation Planner
Aruna Bodduna, Traffic Engineer Lorenzo Lopez, Associate Civil Engineer Darwin Galang,
Assistant Public Works Director Damian Skinner
16 members of the public were present.
Present 5 - Committee Member Terry Barton, Committee Member James Kuszmaul,
Committee Member Kalyanaraman Shankari, Vice Chair Valerie Fenwick, and Chair
Lada Adamic
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
4. MINUTES APPROVAL
4. Minutes Approval
Approve the B/PAC meeting minutes for January 27, 2021 with the following edits for Item
6.3: Add comments on a disconnect between the Police report and mapped data, and
non-automobile collisions (between bicyclists, or bicyclists and pedestrians).
Adamic/Shankari - 5/0/0
Yes: 5- Committee Member Barton, Committee Member Kuszmaul, Committee Member
Shankari, Vice Chair Fenwick, and Chair Adamic
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
6.1 Grant Road and Sleeper Avenue Intersection Study
Darwin Galang and Project Consultant Andrew Dickinson provided a presentation.
City of Mountain View Page 1
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Minutes February 24, 2021
Committee
Public comments
David West from Yorkshire Way noted that many neighbors are not wealthy. He
supported Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHBs) (Alternative 1 or 2) and suggested
prohibiting u-turns on southbound Grant Road.
Bruce England from Mountain View Coalition for Sustainable Planning recommended
implementing traffic calming prior to speed studies to facilitate lower speed limits on
corridors like El Monte. He favored Alternative 2 with a pedestrian refuge.
Silja Paymer noted that the intersection functions as a 4-way crossing for bicyclists. She
requested crossings on both sides of Sleeper to avoid bicyclists crossing on wrong side
or without a light—as happens on the south side of Hyde Park, London. She supported
either traffic signals or beacons on both sides of Sleeper, and opposed LED crosswalks.
Dale Kuersten commented that he has been pursuing this project for a decade. As a
retired firefighter, he is aware of speeding here, and supports Alternative 2 with a PHB
and pedestrian refuge.
Resident Molly Carlson requested that the City maintain left turns on Grant Road to
maintain access and avoid traffic diversion. She felt that the traffic data underestimated
left turns. She also noted that LED crosswalks are not noticeable for motorists and she
was opposed to the existing condition (Alternative 4).
April Webster noted that she frequently bikes this route and is concerned about speeds
of more than 35 mph. She support a signal or something more than a crosswalk.
Committee comments
James Kuszmaul supported either the PHB or traffic signal and noted that there is no
sidewalk on the southside of Sleeper. He asked if a bulbout could be considered to
reduce turning speeds and crossing distance.
Shankari requested options to allow bike through movements to Cuesta Park such as a
median opening. She generally did not favor options with treatment on one side only
because they require bicyclists to dismount or wrong-way ride. She had planned to
advocate for traffic signals (Alternative 3), but was open to PHBs.
Lada Adamic favored Alternative 1, 2 or 3. She would prefer crossings on both
approaches, but supported Alternative 2 with the pedestrian refuge, and suggested that
the City could later upgrade to a full signal if there are ongoing issues. Given the trail
connection, she felt the 700-foot radius was too limited.
Valerie Fenwick requested lighting over the crosswalk and favored Alternative 2 to reduce
pedestrian conflicts with vehicles. She commented that in the UK people can push for a
longer crossing countdown. She also requested that the City design for slower speeds
along arterials rather than accepting high speeds.
Terry Barton acknowledged diversity in the neighborhood and supported Alternative 2 due
to the way that it addressed left turn conflicts.
MOTION: Recommend Alternative 2 with a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) and
pedestrian refuge. Fenwick / Barton – 4/0/1 – Shankari abstaining.
City of Mountain View Page 2
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Minutes February 24, 2021
Committee
Yes: 4- Committee Member Barton, Committee Member Kuszmaul, Vice Chair Fenwick,
and Chair Adamic
Abstain: 1- Committee Member Shankari
6.2 Sign Placement in City Rights-of-Way
Lorenzo Lopez provided a presentation on the City’s new standard operating procedure
(SOP) for sign placement in City rights-of-way.
Public comments
Bruce England commented that there is too much clutter on sidewalks, which makes
signs easy to ignore and goes against the Council goal of encouraging active modes.
Committee comments
James Kuszmaul and Valerie Fenwick acknowledged the Measure C mandate and noted
that the public had not been aware of the signs or expense. They urged staff to reduce
the minimum distance between signs and the curb to less than 18 inches. Valerie
Fenwick also commented on concerns of sign blight and sign fatigue, which had been
cited earlier as a reason for not signposting rolled curbs in her neighborhood. Lada
Adamic expressed disappointment that people did not realize the signs were coming, and
wondered if the City could experiment with not putting the signs in initially.
B/PAC members confirmed that the item satisfied the B/PAC motion from January 27,
2021, and recommended adjustments to the SOP to place poles as close to curb as
possible to maximize pedestrian space (in the last resort situations).
6.3 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Funding
Ria Hutabarat Lo provided a presentation on the Transportation Development Act funding.
Public comment
Bruce England supported banking funds for this year, and suggested the following ideas
for funding allocations in future years: intersection improvements at Church/Shoreline,
more responsive Citywide bike detectors, and blue light bike detection feedback system.
Committee comment:
B/PAC received this information.
6.4 Pedestrian Master Plan Review
Ria Hutabarat Lo presented information on the Pedestrian Master Plan update.
Public comments
Silja Paymer requested consideration of extending the Castro StrEATS program to
enhance walkability, and David West seconded this idea.
Committee comments
City of Mountain View Page 3
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Minutes February 24, 2021
Committee
Members made the following comments:
* Prior year comments are still important and valid.
* Add an item to address street furniture in the sidewalk and close sidewalk gaps;
* Ensure City standards specify smooth driveway and curb cut transitions, and
intersection bulbouts to reduce turning speed and crossing distance;
* Recommend streamlined and proactive processes such as the neighborhood traffic
management process, which currently requires neighborhood initiation;
* Incorporate lessons from the COVID period such as sidewalk standards that allow
people to walk side by side, rather than ADA minimum distance;
* Encourage developers to break up large blocks with paseos and provide bicycle
commuting facilities like showers; and
* Undertake a combined Pedestrian Master Plan and Bicycle Transportation Plan.
6.5 B/PAC Fiscal Year 2020-21 Work Plan
No changes were provided. Shankari asked if staff been in contact with schools about
transportation implications of reopening as case rates go down. James Kuszmaul also
noted that all the Suggested Routes to School on the website are showing a 404 error.
6.6 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency (VTA) Bicycle &
Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Update
Greg Unangst shared about the 2/10/2021 VTA BPAC meeting, which covered bus stop
balancing, and Caltrans Program Initiation Documentation (PID) for interchange projects
at 101/San Antonio and 101/Ellis Street. These $14 million efforts include bike and
pedestrian improvements.
7. COMMITTEE/STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS, UPDATES, REQUESTS, AND COMMITTEE
REPORTS
7.1. Staff Comments
Aruna Bodduna reported on 16 AskMV tickets last month, mostly relating to pedestrian
and bicycle maintenance items. Other announcements included the Strategic Plan
community meeting (2/25), vaccinations at the Community Center, AccessMV
community meeting (2/28), and Community Shuttle funding recommendation to VTA
Board as part of the Innovative Transit Measure B funding program.
7.2. Committee Comments
Valerie Fenwick requested information on the Council adoption of a change to the bylaws
and last quarter’s near miss data. Lada Adamic noted that she had observed children
learning to ride on the Monte Loma black top, so hoped that any school fencing would
allow a an open gate after hours.
8. SET DATE AND TIME FOR NEXT MEETING
9. CALENDAR
10. ADJOURNMENT
Lada Adamic adjourned the meeting at 9:16 p.m.
City of Mountain View Page 4
Agenda
City of Mountain View
Agenda
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Wednesday, February 24, 2021 6:30 PM Video Conference with No Physical Meeting
Location
This meeting will be conducted in accordance with State of California Executive Order N-29-20,
dated March 17, 2020. All members of the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee will
participate in the meeting by video conference, with no physical meeting location.
Members of the public wishing to comment on an item may do so in the following ways:
1. Email comments to bpac@mountainview.gov by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date. Emails will be
forwarded to the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Please identify the Agenda Item
number in the subject line of your email. All emails received will be entered into the record for the
meeting.
2. Provide oral public comments during the meeting:
Online:
Register in advance to access the meeting via Zoom Webinar:
https://mountainview.gov/bpac_speakers
You will be asked to enter an email address and a name. Your email address will not be
disclosed to the public. After registering, you will receive an email with instructions on how to
connect to the meeting.
When the Chair announces the item on which you wish to speak, click the “raise hand” feature in
Zoom. Speakers will be notified of their turn shortly before they are called on to speak.
By phone:
Dial: (669) 900-9128 and enter Webinar ID: 967 1918 7804
When the Chair announces the item on which you wish to speak, dial *9. Phone participants will
be called on by the last two digits of their phone number.
When called to speak, please limit your comments to the time allotted (up to 3 minutes, at the
discretion of the Chair).
For instructions on using the "raise hand" feature in Zoom, visit
https://mountainview.gov/raise_hand.
City of Mountain View Page 1 Printed on 2/17/2021
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Agenda February 24, 2021
Committee
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Committee on
any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. State law prohibits
the Committee from acting on non-agenda items.
4. MINUTES APPROVAL
4. Minutes Approval
Recommendation: Approve the B/PAC meeting minutes for January 27, 2021.
Attachments: B/PAC Meeting Minutes January 27, 2021
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
6.1 Grant Road and Sleeper Avenue Intersection Study
Recommendation: Provide input on a preferred alternative for the Grant Road and
Sleeper Avenue Intersection Study.
Attachments: Grant Sleeper Intersection Memo
Attachment 1 - Study Intersection
Attachment 2 - Proposed Alternatives
Attachment 3 - Polling Questions Report no highlights
6.2 Sign Placement in City Rights-of-Way
Recommendation: Receive report on sign placement standard operating procedures sign
placement in City rights-of-way, and confirm whether this information
satisfies the B/PAC motion (Item 7.2) from January 27, 2021.
Attachments: Sign Placement Memo
6.3 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Funding
Recommendation: Receive information on Transportation Development Act Article 3
funding.
Attachments: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Funding memo
City of Mountain View Page 2 Printed on 2/17/2021
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Agenda February 24, 2021
Committee
6.4 Pedestrian Master Plan Review
Recommendation: Review and provide comments regarding the current Pedestrian
Master Plan (PMP).
Attachments: Pedestrian Master Plan Memo
Attachment 1 - PMP Comments
6.5 B/PAC Fiscal Year 2020-21 Work Plan
Recommendation: Review the FY 2020-21 Work Plan and provide updates on recent and
upcoming activities.
Attachments: FY 2020-21 B/PAC Work Plan
Attachment 1 Work Plan TAL
6.6 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency (VTA) Bicycle & Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC) Update
Recommendation: Receive a report from the City's VTA BPAC representative on the VTA
BPAC agenda items.
7. COMMITTEE/STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS, UPDATES, REQUESTS, AND COMMITTEE
REPORTS
No action will be taken on any questions raised by the Committee at this time.
7.1. Staff Comments
7.2. Committee Comments
8. SET DATE AND TIME FOR NEXT MEETING
Wednesday, March 31, 2021 B/PAC Meeting at 6:30 p.m.
9. CALENDAR
Wednesday, April 28, 2021 B/PAC Meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Wednesday, June 30, 2021 B/PAC Meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Wednesday, August 25, 2021 B/PAC Meeting at 6:30 p.m.
10. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDAS FOR BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
City of Mountain View Page 3 Printed on 2/17/2021
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Agenda February 24, 2021
Committee
- The specific location of each meeting is noted on the notice and agenda for each meeting which is posted at least 72
hours in advance of the meeting. Special meetings may be called as necessary by the Committee Chair and noticed at
least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
- Questions and comments regarding the agenda may be directed to the Public Works Department at (650) 903-6311 or
public.works@mountainview.gov.
- Interested persons may review the agenda and staff reports at https://mountainview.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx, at the
Public Works Department counter, 500 Castro Street, First Floor and at the meeting.
SPECIAL NOTICE—Reference: Americans with Disabilities Act, 1990
- Anyone planning to attend a meeting who is visually or hearing-impaired or has any disability that needs special
assistance should call the Public Works Department at (650) 903-6306 48-hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for
assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, agendas and writings distributed during the meeting
that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an
assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting.
- The Committee may take action on any matter noticed herein in any manner deemed appropriate by the Committee.
Their consideration of the matters noticed herein is not limited by the recommendations indicated herein.
SPECIAL NOTICE—Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee
regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the Public Works Department, 500
Castro Street, during normal business hours and at the meeting location noted on the agenda during the meeting.
ADDRESSING THE COMMITTEE
- Interested persons are entitled to speak on any item on the agenda and should make their interest known to the Chair.
- Anyone wishing to address the Committee on a nonagenda item may do so during the "Oral Communications" part of the
agenda. Speakers are allowed to speak once on any number of topics for up to three minutes.
City of Mountain View Page 4 Printed on 2/17/2021
Get email alerts for Mountain View
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.