City Council Workshop
Regular MeetingOakdale, MN · March 8, 2022
Minutes
WORKSHOP
OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
March 8, 2022
The City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at Oakdale City Hall, 1584 Hadley
Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota. The meeting began at 5:00 PM.
Present: Mayor Paul Reinke
Council Members: Jake Ingebrigtson
Colleen Swedberg
Kevin Zabel
Susan Olson
Also Present: Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Kathy Laur, City Clerk
Nick Newton, Police Chief
Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director
Jim Romanik, Public Works Manager
Andrew Gitzlaff, Community Development Director
Lori Pulkrabek, Communication Manager
Shannon Reidlinger, Senior Community Development Specialist
Dallas Pierson, Planning Commission
PLANNING PROJECTS UPDATE
Community Development Director Andy Gitzlaff did a presentation on the city’s upcoming planning
projects.
1) He started with Glenbrook’s small area plan and stated that there is poor vehicle and pedestrian
access to the neighborhood, adjacent land uses that are in conflict and limited access to park
space. There has been some talk about wanting to expand Cedric’s Landing but there are wetland
impact issues. There is also development interest along Hwy 36. Glenbrook is eligible for a
Washington County Community Development Agency (CDA) Predevelopment Finance Fund Grant. It
provides funding up to $40,000 for the project and requires a 50% local match. The application will
be considered at their April 19, 2022 CDA meeting. A resolution of support is required from the City
as part of the application. Gitzlaff will bring this forward to the March 22, 2022 City Council meeting
if council wants to move forward on it.
2) Mr. Gitzlaff went on to talk about the bike and pedestrian plan update and the need for it to be
updated in order to guide the next 10-20 years. He stated that this is an amenity people look at
when thinking about moving to the area. Bike and pedestrian improvement applications for funding
will be more competitive for grant funds and/or implementation by other road authorities if they are
in a plan. The city contracted with Toole Design Group to update the bike and pedestrian plan
starting in the summer of 2019. Work was put on hold due to COVID in the spring of 2020. There
are six phases to the project. Phases 1 and 2 were complete. Phase 3 is half done and that’s when
the project was put on hold. It is something the city needs to get back to so it can be completed.
WORKSHOP MINUTES
March 8, 2022
Page Two
Mr. Gitzlaff has a proposed 10-month schedule to complete the plan including additional public
engagement and City Council guidance.
3) Willowbrooke parks programming, master plan and design. Mr. Gitzlaff stated that the planned
unit master development agreement, approved on June 22, 2021, is what is used as the guide.
White Star Farms is the owner of the land and Lennar is the developer. The city accepted a
combination of land and cash for implementation of park improvements consistent with the city’s
park dedication ordinance. The city received an additional $122,000 from developers for open
space restoration. The city is responsible for open space restoration consistent with the
Willowbrooke Landscape Framework Plan and construction of the parks within Willowbrooke. The
City executed a master service agreement task order with Stantec for open space restoration for
Willowbrooke Phase 1 on March 25, 2021. Staff is working with Stantec on a proposal that is in
draft form for Willowbrooke Parks Programming Master Plan and Design. At the end of the
preliminary design phase (Phase 2), the goal is to have both City and community stakeholders in
alignment with the vision and financial parameters of the project. The Finance Director has set up
a separate capital fund for Willowbrooke. Mr. Gitzlaff stated that the park dedication fees received
are enough to design a park, but they are not enough to build a park. Bonding will likely be needed
for the parks. These parks will not be designed just for Willowbrooke residents. Ideally, he would
like to see the design completed by the end of summer, 2022.
Mr. Gitzlaff has been talking with City Administrator Volkers about how we manage all of these
different projects knowing that we are still short employees in the Community Development
department, specifically a City Planner and Community Development Specialist. That will impact
how quickly we can move forward. For the Glenbrook small area plan, he suggested that the new
City Planner manage and lead this from May 2022 to February, 2023. For the bike and pedestrian
plan, he would like to see that get started soon. Senior Community Development Specialist
Reidlinger has the capacity and necessary skill set to work on this project.
Mr. Gitzlaff stated Willowbrooke Parks and Programming is the priority right now and the Council
confirmed that. The money for Phase 1 and Phase 2 would come out of the park dedication fees for
Willowbrooke. On the heels of this will be Helmo Station park improvements.
Mayor Reinke mentioned a conversation with a board member from the Chamber of Commerce on
business retention. This board member was unaware of the movement towards a partnership with
the Oakdale Area Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Gitzlaff said that at the February meeting the
Chamber Board was supportive of the partnership with the City for a business retention program.
ANIMAL IMPOUND CONTRACT
Police Chief Newton reviewed the current contract with the City of St. Paul Animal Control for
impounding animals. Recently, St. Paul terminated its services with suburban cities. The police
department has until May 6, 2022 to find a new solution. After some research, he has found two
potential solutions. 1) Companion Animal Control (CAC) and 2) the Animal Humane Society (AHS).
CAC is a no kill shelter and it would cost the city about $8,000 a year. They offer other services as
WORKSHOP MINUTES
March 8, 2022
Page Three
well. They will pick up and transport the animals to a shelter and post pictures of the animals on
their website. The AHS is less expensive at about $6,400 a year, but the animal services contract
authorizes them to euthanize animals at their discretion. They impound only.
After discussion among council members, Mayor Reinke summarized that it was the consensus of
the council that “no kill” was the direction they are in favor of going.
ELECTRONIC PAYMENT PROCESSING FEES
Finance Director Zimmerman stated that this was a continuation of the discussion on OpenGov’s
Citizen Services platform. Council directed staff to provide a summary of electronic payment
methods for city services. He discussed utility billing payments over the last 15 years with Payment
Services Network (PSN) and its costs. He also discussed that the city will begin ambulance billing
through LifeQuest beginning April 1, 2022 and the associated fees. Ambulance billing would be
subject to a 2.35% fee. Further, Mr. Zimmerman talked about OpenGov Citizen Service’s specifically
permitting and licensing software and those costs.
Mr. Zimmerman recommended utility billing electronic fees be absorbed by the water and sewer
fund which is the current structure, at the City’s cost, and not direct the cost be borne by the utility
customer. and OpenGov permitting and licensing fees would be absorbed by the user.
Mayor Reinke started off saying that staff’s recommendation seemed reasonable.
Council Member Zabel stated he was comfortable with utility billing going to the end user.
Council Member Ingebrigtson said the city has to let the customer know there will be a service
charge before they “hit send.”
Council Member Swedberg stated she is generally ok with this. She would like to keep it the way it
is and she does not like the ambulance fee.
Council Member Olson said she does not want to pass on the utility fees.
Council Member Ingebrigtson said he was fine passing on the fees. It is a convenience.
The majority supports the proposal as presented.
SALES TAX FOR PROPOSED POLICE FACILITY AND PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY – LANGUAGE FOR
BALLOT
City Administrator Volkers has had a lot of input on the proposed language for the 2022 general
election ballot questions regarding the half-cent sales tax increase. Ms. Volkers specifically noted:
1) The first question should be about the Public Works facility and the second question about the
WORKSHOP MINUTES
March 8, 2022
Page Four
police facility – she explained the reasoning behind this proposed order; 2) The language proposed
was reviewed and does the Council want any changes? Much of the language proposed is legally
necessary and in the approved legislation for the authority to request the half-cent sales tax from
voters, and; 3) she remains concerned with how the 0.5% sales tax is noted and that it may imply
1% total. Ms. Volkers asked for council feedback.
Council Member Swedberg said she preferred “rehabilitation” instead of “construction” for the
Police Facility language. Ms. Volkers said “remodel” may be a good word as well as that is really
what the City is doing. Mayor Reinke suggested “renovation.” The consensus was that “renovation”
was the best word. Mayor Reinke stated that it was imperative to get the new public works building.
Once that is complete, the police department would move into the old public works building while
the police department is being renovated.
Council Member Zabel felt some of the language at the end of each ballot question should be moved
to the beginning of the question.
Ms. Volkers told the council that this item would be brought back to them one more time for approval
after consultation with the Consultant being hired to manage the public education.
SPECIAL PROJECT FUND EXPENDITURE UPDATE
Finance Director Zimmerman updated the Council on the status of uncompleted projects. Staff has
prepared a spending summary as of February 28, 2022.
1) The ambulance hasn’t been delivered yet, but Chief Wold is optimistic that it should be
delivered sometime mid-summer 2022.
2) There is some money for lobbying pending council’s decision and direction.
3) Online Time Cards; the number is higher than what was approved because of turnover in the
department in addition to some changes needed in the process and clarity about the
product. There is some risk that we may go over $7,500, but Mr. Zimmerman will keep an
eye on it.
4) Public Works Manager Romanik stated that when the original budget was set, the Park
Harper Sweeper was available for purchase under state contract purchasing. During the
process while the budget was being approved, the contract expired and was no longer
available for purchase through the state contract. The original money that was budgeted was
no longer enough. Between Mr. Romanik and Parks Supervisor Koesling, it was decided that
the Park Harper Sweeper is the priority over the flail mower.
Council Member Zabel inquired about the two IT items that were skipped in 2021 including phone
components. Mr. Zimmerman replied that after talking to IT Specialist Pat Kandia, it was determined
that no more money would go into current technology. Ms. Volkers stated that the city needs a new
phone system. Until that evaluation is done, nothing more will be spent on current phone
technology. One of the items was for radar systems in the PD, which Chief Newton said were not
needed, as they were able to repurpose units from older squads.
WORKSHOP MINUTES
March 8, 2022
Page Five
Mayor Reinke said he was in favor of purchasing the Park Harper Sweeper.
PROPOSED CITY CODE AMENDMENT: TEMPORARY OUTDOOR PATIOS/2022 DEMONSTRATION,
CONTINUED DISCUSSION FROM FEBRUARY 8, 2022 WORKSHOP
Community Development Director Gitzlaff followed up on the discussion that was had at the city
council workshop February 8, 2022 regarding the Temporary Outdoor Patios. He went through some
of the question’s council had and provided answers.
Council Member Ingebrigtson stated that he would prefer that the City not charge a fee for
temporary outdoor patios and has confidence in city staff to handle.
Council Member Zabel suggested that the 30-day process to apply and then be issued a license
could be lessened to two weeks if staff is approving. He also stated that noise is still an issue for
him especially for businesses that abut houses. He believes the business should not be able to
have a variance for noise if adjacent to residential uses.
Council Member Olson’s concern is that there may be businesses that don’t abut houses and
neighbors won’t be affected, now we are limiting them.
Council Member Swedberg suggested that something be added to the application that states the
applicant check a box that the property owner agrees. Director Gitzlaff noted that there is a
signature box on the application as well for the property owner if different than the business owner.
She’s ok with a $100 fee and also with staff approving the license.
Council stated their general support for the temporary outdoor patio license with a $100 license
fee and approval at the staff level.
This item will be placed on the March 22, 2022 City Council meeting for a public hearing and
approval.
COUNCIL TOPICS
Mayor Reinke received a call from Nancy Livingston, Senator Wiger’s Chief of Staff and asked if he
could come and testify at a hearing Thursday about the sound walls being requested by residents
in Oakdale. Senator Wiger has two bills equating to $3,500,000 as one=time appropriation to
construct sound walls on the east side of Hwy 694 where our residents have been complaining the
most.
Council Member Zabel stated that the resolution states that we support any legislation that would
provide funding. The Council asked that the word “any” be taken out.
WORKSHOP MINUTES
March 8, 2022
Page Six
City Administrator Volkers added that she looked back at the cost of sound barriers in 2015 and
$3,500,000 only covers one mile of road and there is more than one mile that is being requested.
Mayor Reinke also stated that last Monday he testified on the legislation regarding the White Bear
Lake water levels. He was joined by Kristina Handt, City Administrator for Lake Elmo, and Bryan
Bear, City Administrator for Hugo. Senator Housley was carrying the bill. Mayor Reinke stated that
if this didn’t pass it would affect the quality of life for the residents of Oakdale and the east metro
in general in regards to water needs.
Council Member Ingebrigtson said he has had the war in Ukraine on his mind and he asked what
would happen structurally in Oakdale if there is a nuclear attack? He added he thought it would be
so chaotic that any potential plan wouldn’t work.
Council Member Olson mentioned that she couldn’t hear the meeting during the last City Council
meeting. She was listening via YouTube. She also added that Planning Commissioners couldn’t read
the maps online as it’s too difficult and small. Council Member Olson stated people need to speak
into the mics. Ms. Volkers said she would talk to IT Specialist Kandia about it and try to work
something out.
Council Member Swedberg talked about the landscape revival at Fire Station 1 and that they want
to donate $100 to the fire department for the event being held on Saturday, June 4th.
Council Member Zabel asked about the Arbor Day Give-Away. It will be April 30th. More details will
follow. A proclamation will be announced at tonight’s Regular City Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The workshop was adjourned for the Regular City Council meeting at 6:55 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Kathy Laur, City Clerk
Agenda
AGENDA
City Council Workshop
Workshop
March 8, 2022
Council Chambers
5:00 PM City Planning Projects Update
5:30 PM Animal Impound Contract
5:40 PM Electronic Payment Processing Fees
6:00 PM Local Option Sales Tax Referendum Ballot
6:20 PM Special Project Fund Expenditure Update
6:30 PM Temporary Outdoor Patios
6:40 PM Council Topics
6:55 PM Adjourn for Regular Meeting
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Andrew Gitzlaff, Community Development Director
Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: Planning Projects Update
BACKGROUND
Andy Gitzlaff, Community Development Director will give an update on various planning projects that are
in process, upcoming or will need to be completed in the future. The update will include a discussion of
budget, timing and staffing considerations to complete the work.
Attachment
Planning Projects Update Presentation
Planning Projects Update
Oakdale City Council Workshop
March 8, 2022
Agenda
• In-Progress Planning Projects
• Glenbrook Small Area Plan
• Bike and Pedestrian Plan Update
• Upcoming Planning Projects
• Business Retention Expansion and Attraction (covered at 2/22 council workshop)
• Willowbrooke Parks Programming, Master Plan and Design
• Future Planning Projects
• Helmo Station Parks, Programming, Master Plan and Design (to be covered at a
future council workshop)
• Budget, Timing and Staffing Considerations
• Discussion
Glenbrook Small Area Plan
• Why Needed
• Future Land Use and Zoning do not align resulting in competing visions for
development/redevelopment
• Land use conflicts between residential and industrial uses
• Poor auto, pedestrian and truck circulation
• Limited park and open space access
• Future Hwy 36 and Hwy 120 Interchange will result in additional access
restrictions
• Interest by multiple developers for a variety of uses
• Solution
• Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goal 1 Policy 2 - Prepare a small area plan for
Glenbrook neighborhood to guide public and private investment to achieve City’s
redevelopment goals.
• City Council work session in September, 2020, outlining the issues and process to
be undertaken in a Small Area Plan (SAP)
Glenbrook Neighborhood and Study Area
Schedule and Key Tasks
Glenbrook Small Area Plan
• Eligible for Washington County
Community Development Agency (CDA)
Predevelopment Finance Fund Grant
• Funding up to $40,000 for project requiring
a 50 percent local match
• Demonstrate how project will increase
future commercial and industrial tax base
and employment opportunities
• Application to be considered at the April 19,
2022 CDA Board meeting
• Resolution of support required from City as
part of the application
Bike and Pedestrian Plan Update
• Why needed
• Oakdale’s bike and pedestrian system provides an affordable
transportation option with recreation and health benefits
• Gaps in connection exist between the city’s bike and pedestrian system
plan (last updated in 1995) and the region’s expanding multimodal
transportation system
• Bike and Pedestrian improvements will be more competitive for grant
funds and/or implementation by other road authorities if in Plan
• Solution
• Comprehensive Plan Transportation Goal 4 Policy 1: Prepare a new bike
and pedestrian system plan to guide bike and pedestrian
improvements over the next 10 – 20 years
Work completed and remaining
City contracted with Toole Design Group to update the bike and pedestrian plan starting in the
summer of 2019. Work was put on hold at the onset of the pandemic spring of 2020.
Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Phase 4: NOT PHASE 5: NOT PHASE 6: NOT
COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED
Work program Relevant local and Existing bike and Formulate goals, Prepare draft Council accepts new
presented and regional bike and pedestrian system strategies, and illustrative bike and bike and pedestrian
approved by Council pedestrian plans and issues identified actions pedestrian plan plan
policies reviewed
Schedule and Key Tasks
10 month schedule to complete the plan including additional
public engagement and City Council guidance at each milestone.
Willowbrooke Parks Programming, Master Plan and
Design
• Master Planned Unit Development Agreement between the City
and White Star Farms and US Home Corp (Developers) executed
June 22, 2021 outlines City and Developers responsibilities for
public improvements
• City accepted a combination of land (47.2 acres) and cash ($349,740) for
implementation of park improvements consistent with our park
dedication ordinance
• City received $122,000 from Developers for open space restoration
• City responsible for open space restoration consistent with the
Willowbrooke Landscape Framework Plan and construction of the 3 parks
within Willowbrooke to coincide with each phase of development
Parks and Maintenance Areas
Willowbrooke Parks Programming, Master Plan and
Design
• City executed a master service agreement task order with Stantec for open space
restoration for Willowbrooke Phase 1 on March 25, 2021
• Staff working with Stantec on a proposal for Willowbrooke Parks Programming,
Master Plan and Design
• Four key phases:
1. Data Collection and Needs Assessment
2. Preliminary Design (Programming and Analysis)
3. Final Construction Plans and Bidding Documents
4. Construction Administration
• At the end of the preliminary design phase (Phase 2), the goal is to have both City
and community stakeholders in alignment with the vision and financial parameters
of the project.
• Unable to provide an exact cost for Phases 3 and 4 before Phase 2 is complete
Willowbrooke Parks Programming, Master Plan and
Design
• Financial Management
• City Finance has setup a separate capital fund account for Willowbrooke
to account for funds received and costs incurred by the City
• This is an industry best practice for complex projects that have multi
phase construction timelines
• Likely a model for other development projects in the future.
• Financing
• Park dedicated funds received will not be enough for the establishment
and programming of the 3 parks.
• City will likely need to bond to cover the costs of park improvements
• Cost will not be known until Preliminary Design is completed
Budget, Timing and Staffing Considerations
Study Timing Staff Project Consultant Comm Dev Other Sources Total Budget
Manager Budget*
Glenbrook Small May 2022 – City Planner (vacant) Stantec $40,000 $40,000 $80,000
Area Plan February 2023 County CDA
Grant**
Bike and Ped Plan March 2022 – Senior Comm Dev. Toole Design $55,000 $40,000
Update January 2023 Specialist
Business April 2022 – Comm Development Oakdale Area Chamber $15,500 $15,500
Retention, March 2023 Director / Senior of Commerce & St. Paul
Expansion and Comm. Dev. Specialist Area Chamber of
Attraction (vacant) Commerce
Willowbrooke March 2022 – City Planner Stantec $70,000 $70,000
Parks June 2022 Willowbrooke (Phase 1 and
Programming, Park 2 estimate)
Master Plan and Dedicated
Design (phase 1 Funds
and 2)
*Funding is available in the 2022 Community Development Professional Services Budget and carryover funds from 2021
**Funding is contingent upon grant award from Washington County
Discussion
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To Mayor and City Council
Through Nicholas Newton, Police Chief
Date March 8, 2022
Subject Animal Impound Contract
Background
The Police Department has contracted with the City of Saint Paul Animal Control for impounding
animals for several years. Recently, the City of Saint Paul terminated animal control services with
suburban cities due to a variety of internal issues. The Police Department has until May 6, 2022, to
find a new solution for animal impound services.
In recent years, the Police Department has budgeted $7,500 annually toward animal control, with
$6,000 specifically dedicated toward the anticipated animal impound services. After conducting
research on animal impound services, the Police Department found two potential solutions that are
seemingly the most reasonable options. The two options include Companion Animal Control (CAC) and
the Animal Humane Society (AHS).
The CAC and AHS each have their benefits and disadvantages. To summarize the pros and cons of both
options, the CAC is more expensive but they only utilize no-kill animal shelters. Whereas, the AHS is
less expensive but the animal services contract authorizes them to euthanize animals at their
discretion. Related to associated anticipated cost, annual cost for services through the CAC is expected
to be about $8,000 while the AHS is expected to be approximately $6,400.
The Police Department seeks input from Council on animal control and impound services for the City of
Oakdale. Please refer to the attachments for more information relating to the CAC and AHS services,
fees, and agreements.
Direction Needed
Staff is requesting feedback on preference for animal impound services.
Attachment
Oakdale impound data and anticipated cost comparison analysis
City of Oakdale Animal Impound Data
Years 2020 & 2021
City of Oakdale Animal Impound Data
Saint Paul Animal Control
Year 2020 Year 2021
Animal complaints 524 Animal complaints 587
Dogs impounded 15 Dogs impounded 13
Cats impounded 8 Cats impounded 10
Other 1 Other 0
Total impounds 24 Total impounds 23
Returned to owner 9 Returned to owner 7
Rescue/Adoption 10 Rescue/Adoption 15
Euthanasia 3 Euthanasia 1
Died at shelter 2 Died at shelter 0
Average stay in days 7 Average stay in days 7
Annual Cost Comparison
(Based on 2020 & 2021 Oakdale Average Animal Data)
Below is a cost comparison for the services/fees of Companion Animal Control and an estimated cost to
the City of Oakdale for a full-time employed Police Officer to complete animal control duties. The hourly
rate of the Oakdale Police Officer is based on the 2022 salary range of 75-94K, calculating a median
range at $84,500 (equating to $40/hr.). The cost comparisons for impounded animals compare Otter
Lake Animal Care Center (with CAC as animal control) and AHS (with Oakdale as animal control).
For reference, a standard animal at large call response equates to 1.5-2 hours of time and includes the
following: phone call from dispatch, phone call to finder to gather info, driving to found location to collect animal,
answering finder questions/concerns, calling dispatch to update animal description, scanning for microchip,
transporting animal to impound, completing impound paperwork, photographing animal, posting animal online,
return drive leaving impound, eventual follow up with owner to provide reclaim information, etc.
Animal Control: CAC Animal Control: Oakdale Officers
Animal Impound: OLACC Animal Impound: AHS
Yearly Fee (CAC) CAC: $1,200 n/a
30 Call Responses/Animals CAC: $3,000 Oakdale PD: $1,830-$2,400
(avg time 1.5-2 hours) (based on $100 flat fee/call response) (based on officer salary avg $40/hr.)
Avg Mileage x 30 animals CAC: $870 Oakdale PD: $765
(IRS 2022 rate .58/mi) (Avg 50 miles/call) (Avg 44 miles/call)
15 Animals Reclaimed by OLACC: $0 AHS: $360
Owners (no impound fee to city) (based on $24 AHS fee)
15 Animals Unclaimed OLACC: $2,625 AHS: $3,120
(based on $175 OLACC fee) (based on $208 AHS fee)
Annual Total Cost
$7,695 $6,075-$6,645
Estimate
Non-quantifiable costs
• Officer time—Removing officers from Oakdale jurisdiction to transport animals may result in
longer call response time to return to Oakdale from impound an animal in Lino Lakes
• Officer time—cleaning squad cars after transport of animals, SOP biohazard requirement to
clean vehicle after animal transport before people can be transported
• Equipment—vehicle wear/tear, handling equipment, case documents, etc.
• Public Communications—all aspects of communicating with the public regarding lost animal
reports, found animals, animal welfare complaints, posting of animals in care, etc. (CAC also
receives calls from the public on a daily basis regarding general animal inquires and addresses
these calls as part of the monthly retainer, at no additional cost to the city)
• Potential injury/insurance—animal bites may result in work comp claims (CAC is licensed and
substantially insured as a subcontractor requiring no additional cost to city)
• Animal Welfare—CAC often provides transparent reassurance to the public that the stray
animal they found will be safely cared for as we maintain strong partnerships with vet clinics
and rescues in the area to ensure the welfare of animals.
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director
Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: Electronic Payment Processing Fees
BACKGROUND
As part of the discussion regarding OpenGov’s Citizen Services platform, Council directed staff to
provide a summary of electronic payment methods for city services. Going forward, the City will have
three separate and unique credit card processing options. With ambulance billing and online permitting
and licensing undergoing implementation, staff is requesting direction on how to allocate these
processing fees.
Utility Billing
For over the last 15 years, Payment Services Network (PSN) has been the electronic payment processor
for utility transactions. PSN allows customers to pay by checking/savings/credit card, view electronic
payment history, manage multiple billing accounts, and securely save payment methods. Additionally,
the City has a daily integration between PSN and Billmaster (the City’s utility billing software) which
ensures payments are applied to the proper account.
PSN was recently acquired by Invoice Could, which will require the City to migrate to a new platform,
should the current billing process remain in place. The current fee structure with PSN is listed below:
$69.95 monthly account fee
$0.55 per electronic payment processed by customer
$1.55 for payments processed by the PSN call center
Oakdale does not currently enforce a surcharge for electronic utility bill payments, and processing fees
are split evenly between the water and sewer funds.
All transaction fees from the individual card issuers are passed along, with no markup.
Ambulance Billing
Beginning April 1, 2022 the City will begin contracting with LifeQuest to provide Ambulance Billing
services. As part of the relationship, the City has the option to partner with Forte to process electronic
payments via myambulancebill.com which has a direct integration with the LifeQuest billing software,
similar to the scenario above between PSN and Billmaster related to Utility Billing. The fees to partner
with Forte are as follows:
$14.95 monthly account fee
Mastercard/Visa/Discover
o 2.14% transaction fee
o $0.24 per item fee
o $0.35 per batch fee
American Express
o 2.90% transaction fee
o $0.24 per item fee
OpenGov Citizen Services – Permitting & Licensing
The proposed permitting and licensing software, provided by OpenGov, has an exclusive partnership
with Stripe for electric payment processing. While cash and check payments have no transaction fees,
electronic payments are subject to the following fees:
2.99% transaction fee
$0.99 per item fee
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending the following allocations for electronic payments fees:
Utility Billing Electronic - fees be absorbed by the Water and Sewer Fund (current structure) at
the City’s cost and not by the utility customer
Ambulance Billing – Users subject to a 2.35% fee
OpenGov Permitting and Licensing – Users absorb all fees
Council Direction Requested
It is requested that Council provide staff direction on how they would like to allocate the costs
associated with electronic payment processing. The fees can be absorbed by the city, passed along to
the customer, or a blend of the two. MN State Statute §325G.051 allows for a surcharge on credit
cards not to exceed five percent of the purchase price.
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Christina M. Volkers, City Administrator
Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: Sales Tax for Proposed Police Facility and Public Works Facility – language for ballot
November 8, 2022
BACKGROUND
The City of Oakdale identified the need for two large-scale public infrastructure projects: a new Public
Works facility and the expansion and complete renovation of the Police Department facility with funding
proposed by the use of Local Option Sales Tax (L.O.S.T.). Per the established process, the City Council
adopted Resolution 2021-17 on January 26, 2021 requesting that the Legislature authorize individual
projects be eligible for L.O.S.T. financing. In order to make the special legislation effect, on July 13,
2021 the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-75 approving the law in all aspects, directing the city
clerk to file resolution and certification to the Minnesota Secretary of State, and directing staff to take
necessary actions to implement the law and bring further proceedings as necessary to implement the
law.
Minnesota Statute § 205.16 requires that the City Clerk provide to the County Auditor written notice of
a ballot question, including the title and language of the question, at least 74 days before the election,
which in this case is on or before August 25, 2022. In order to do so, the Council must determine both
the ballot title and the question.
STAFF AND/OR BOARD OR COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Staff checked with legal and the following meets the intent of the legislation, which requires separate
ballot questions for each project. Discussion should occur regarding preferred language:
City Ballot Question #1: Imposition of Sales Tax (or “Considering ½ cent sales tax”) for New Public
Works Facility – Draft Language
“Shall the City of Oakdale impose a temporary sales and use tax of one-half percent (0.5%) for a
period of twenty-five (25) years or until $22,000,000 plus the costs of issuing any bonds
including interest to finance all or a portion of the cost of construction of a new Public Works
Facility provided that such tax shall terminate sooner if the City Council determines that all such
costs have been paid?”
City Ballot Question #2: Imposition of Sales Tax (or “Considering ½ cent sales tax”) for Construction and
Rehabilitation of Police Department Facility – Draft Language
“Shall the City of Oakdaleimpose a temporary sales and use tax of one-half percent (0.5%) for a
period of twenty-five (25) years or until $15,000,000 plus the costs of issuing any bonds
including interest to finance all or a portion of the cost of construction and rehabilitation of the
Oakdale Police Department Facility provided that such tax shall terminate sooner if the City
Council determines that all such costs have been paid?”
Attachment
Minnesota State Laws 2021, First Special Session, Chapter 14, Article 8, Section 15
Minnesota State Laws 2021, First Special Session, Chapter 14, Article 8, Section 15.
CITY OF OAKDALE; TAXES AUTHORIZED.
Subdivision 1.
Sales and use tax authorization.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 477A.016, or any other ordinance or
city charter, and if approved by the voters at a general election as required under Minnesota
Statutes, section 297A.99, subdivision 3, the city of Oakdale may impose, by ordinance, a
sales and use tax of one-half of one percent for the purposes specified in subdivision 2.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section
297A.99, govern the imposition, administration, collection, and enforcement of the tax
authorized under this subdivision. The tax imposed under this subdivision is in addition to
any local sales and use tax imposed under any other special law.
Subd. 2.
Use of sales and use tax revenues.
The revenues derived from the tax authorized under subdivision 1 must be used by
the city of Oakdale to pay the costs of collecting and administering the tax and paying for the
following projects in the city, including securing and paying debt service on bonds issued to
finance all or part of the following projects:
(1) $22,000,000 plus associated bonding costs for construction of a new public
works facility; and
(2) $15,000,000 plus associated bonding costs for construction and rehabilitation,
and associated building costs of the police department facility.
Subd. 3.
Bonding authority.
(a) The city of Oakdale may issue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 475, to
finance all or a portion of the costs of the projects authorized in subdivision 2. The aggregate
principal amount of bonds issued under this subdivision may not exceed: (1) $22,000,000 for
the project listed in subdivision 2, clause (1), plus an amount applied to the payment of costs
of issuing the bonds; and (2) $15,000,000 for the projects listed in subdivision 2, clause (2),
plus an amount applied to the payment of costs of issuing the bonds. The bonds may be paid
from or secured by any funds available to the city of Oakdale, including the tax authorized
under subdivision 1. The issuance of bonds under this subdivision is not subject to Minnesota
Statutes, sections 275.60 and 275.61.
(b) The bonds are not included in computing any debt limitation applicable to the
city. Any levy of taxes under Minnesota Statutes, section 475.61, to pay principal of and
interest on the bonds is not subject to any levy limitation. A separate election to approve the
bonds under Minnesota Statutes, section 475.58, is not required.
Subd. 4.
Termination of taxes.
The tax imposed under subdivision 1 expires at the earlier of: (1) 25 years after the
tax is first imposed; or (2) when the city council determines that the city has received from
this tax $37,000,000 to fund the projects listed in subdivision 2, plus an amount sufficient to
pay costs related to issuance of any bonds authorized in subdivision 3, including interest on
the bonds. Except as otherwise provided under Minnesota Statutes, section 297A.99,
subdivision 3, paragraph (f), any funds remaining after payment of the allowed costs due to
timing of the termination under Minnesota Statutes, section 297A.99, shall be placed in the
city's general fund. The tax imposed under subdivision 1 may expire at an earlier time if the
city so determines by ordinance.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This section is effective the day after the governing body of the city of Oakdale and
its chief clerical officer comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and
3.
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director
Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: Special Project Fund Expenditure Update
BACKGROUND
During the course of 2021, the City Council approved using the Special Project Fund for several one-
time expenditures. Staff has prepared a spending summary as of February 28, 2022 in order to update
the Council on the status of these items.
Status of Uncompleted Projects
Line Item Description Note
#1 Park Harper Sweeper Public Works staff would like to combine the funds allocated
for the Park Harper Sweeper and Flail Mower to purchase of
the Sweeper.
#21 Ambulance Order has been placed, staff optimistic of delivery mid-
summer 2022.
#22 Lobbyist Additional funding may be requested per Council’s direction
related to 2022 legislative items.
#26 Online Time & Attendance Training will occur during the second week of March and
implementation is scheduled for spring/summer 2022.
Attachment:
Special Project Fund Reconciliation
City of Oakdale, Minnesota
Special Project Fund (530) Summary
As of February 28, 2022 (Unaudited)
Council As of Feb 28, Remaining
Line Item Department Item Amount Approval 2022 Encumbrance Total Notes
1 Public Works Park Harper Sweeper $ 20,000.00 1/26/2021 $ - $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Requesting to combine lines 1 and 4 for purchase
2 Public Works Toro 4000 $ 60,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 54,379.29 $ - $ 54,379.29 Done
3 Public Works Mower (2) $ 30,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 26,275.80 $ - $ 26,275.80 Done
4 Public Works Flail Mower $ 5,000.00 1/26/2021 $ - $ - $ - See Line 1
5 Public Works Pickup $ 35,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 21,399.75 $ - $ 21,399.75 Done
6 Public Works Trailer (2) $ 10,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 10,090.00 $ - $ 10,090.00 Done
7 Public Works Excavator $ 55,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 54,097.17 $ - $ 54,097.17 Done; includes mini excavator & trailer
8 Public Works Plow Truck $ 195,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 188,264.59 $ - $ 188,264.59 Done
9 Police Patrol Vehicle (2) $ 105,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 96,828.05 $ - $ 96,828.05 Done
10 Police Body Armor $ 10,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 7,709.99 $ - $ 7,709.99 Done
11 Police Computers - Office $ 5,200.00 1/26/2021 $ 5,200.00 $ - $ 5,200.00 Done
12 Police Computers - Squad $ 20,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 16,041.96 $ - $ 16,041.96 Done
13 Police Squad Videos $ 11,200.00 1/26/2021 $ 10,845.00 $ - $ 10,845.00 Done
14 Police Portable Radios $ 12,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 9,426.25 $ - $ 9,426.25 Done
15 Police Radar Systems (2) $ 6,500.00 1/26/2021 $ - $ - $ - Skipping in 2021
16 IT Network Switch $ 3,800.00 1/26/2021 $ 3,898.61 $ - $ 3,898.61 Done
17 IT Network Video Recorder $ 11,500.00 1/26/2021 $ 10,992.40 $ - $ 10,992.40 Done
18 IT Computers and Monitors $ 35,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 34,537.08 $ - $ 34,537.08 Done
19 IT Phones, parts $ 3,500.00 1/26/2021 $ - $ - $ - Skipping in 2021
20 IT Printers, Scanners $ 10,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 6,151.00 $ - $ 6,151.00 Done
21 Fire Ambulance $ 285,000.00 1/26/2021 $ - $ 285,000.00 $ 285,000.00 Ordered, delivery estimated mid-2022
22 Admin Lobbyist $ 36,000.00 1/26/2021 $ 20,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 36,000.00 Additional funding may be requested per Council priorities
23 Police Plumbing Fixtures $ 31,600.00 3/9/2021 $ 31,578.00 $ - $ 31,578.00 Done
24 Finance Finance Director Office $ 9,000.00 3/9/2021 $ 5,025.37 $ - $ 5,025.37 Done
25 Public Works Jetter $ 46,000.00 3/9/2021 $ - $ - $ - Financed through VERF/Sewer; may use for OpenGov
26 IT Online Timecards $ 7,500.00 3/9/2021 $ - $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 To be invoiced by Tyler Technologies
27 Admin Police Chief Search $ 24,500.00 5/11/2021 $ 24,500.00 $ - $ 24,500.00 Done
28 Admin CD Director Search $ 20,000.00 8/24/2021 $ 16,022.00 $ - $ 16,022.00 Done
29 Admin Strategic Planning $ 19,500.00 4/13/2021 $ 19,500.00 $ - $ 19,500.00 Done
Totals $ 1,122,800.00 $ 672,762.31 $ 338,500.00 $ 1,011,262.31
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Andy Gitzlaff, Community Development Director and Will Bucheger, Administrative
Intern
Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: Proposed City Code Amendment: Temporary Outdoor Patios/2022 Demonstration,
continued discussion from February 8, 2022 Workshop
BACKGROUND
Approximately half of Oakdale’s 41 restaurants have permanent outdoor seating areas or patios. The
others are not interested in an outdoor patio or their business is unable to have a patio because the
configuration of their lot or the location of their business does not have an area that can be dedicated
for that purpose. During the height of COVID-19 pandemic outdoor patios allowed businesses to
continue to operate as indoor capacity was limited or prohibited. Although the Governor’s emergency
declaration has expired, businesses continue to feel the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many
customers remain more comfortable dining outdoors. Furthermore, temporary outdoor patios give
businesses that are seasonal in nature another opportunity to meet the needs of their customers.
Research from surrounding cities has shown that two nearby cities, North St. Paul and White Bear Lake,
will be allowing Temporary Outdoor Patio permits again in 2022. Some other cities have either
discontinued the use or are still contemplating whether the use will be allowed again in 2022. Four
restaurants within the city have shown continued interest and desire to utilize a Temporary Outdoor
Patio for their business in 2022.
CITY COUNCIL DIRECTION
City Council first reviewed this proposed ordinance at their workshop meeting on June 22, 2021.
Council provided feedback and requested that it be brought back for consideration in 2022. City Council
reviewed the updated proposed ordinance at their workshop meeting on February 8, 2022. Council
provided the following feedback and responses from staff are listed below each comment.
Comment - Council expressed concerns about potential noise impacts to nearby neighbors and
other factors.
Response - The applicant would be required to comply with the City noise ordinance, reference
to the noise ordinance has been added to the proposed temporary patio ordinance and the draft
license application.
Comment - Council asked staff to look into whether a business’s existing liquor license would
cover the outdoor area or if a separate liquor license would be required.
Response – City staff verified that the existing liquor license would be sufficient. The applicant
would need to provide an updated certificate of liability insurance, indicating that liquor liability
is extended to the outside of the building premises.
Comment - If pursued, the design of the fencing and enclosure be evaluated as part of the
license process.
Response – A requirement for review of the materials for the fencing and enclosure has been
added to the proposed temporary patio ordinance and the draft license application.
Comment - Interest in addressing parking minimums to allow permanent patios as an
alternative.
Response – Staff will explore parking minimums for businesses on a more holistic basis as part
of a future project once the City Planner has been hired.
Comment - Concerns about the proposed $400 fee and whether that was too costly.
Response – After further research staff is recommending the fee for the Temporary Outdoor
Patio License be between $100-$200. This recommendation is informed by practices of
surrounding cities, primarily North St. Paul and White Bear Lake who are not charging a fee but
use the licenses process to ensure the patios go through a staff review process before
permission is granted. Staff has compared this temporary license with similar licenses on our
own fee schedule. Specifically, with firework stand permits, Christmas tree sales permit and
transient merchant permits. The prices for these permits range from $100-$250. The reduced
permit fee will still allow staff to recoup a portion of the costs associated with review and
processing of the application, which is the intent of the fee
Comment – How much interest has there been for temporary outdoor patios in 2022 or is it just
one business?
Responses - Staff has since reached out to surrounding restaurants in the community without
permanent patios to gather their thoughts on this potential license. From the discussions, there
is a support in creating this license. Four restaurants have now verbally stated that they would
likely utilize this temporary license if given the opportunity.
Comment - The majority of the council indicated that they would like to pursue the temporary
outdoor patio ordinance as a demonstration in 2022.
Response – The item and propose changes based on Council feedback is being brought back to
the Council workshop for additional discussion on March 8, 2022.
Comment - Requested that the updated proposed ordinance go back to the Planning
Commission for input prior to scheduling a public hearing at the Council.
Response – The item is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission on March 4, 2022
City Staff will verbally update Council on any input received from the Planning Commission.
SUMMARY
City staff recommends that the City Council consider implementing the Temporary Outdoor Patio
ordinance on a demonstration basis for 2022. City staff is recommended a fee between $100-$200.
The license application has been updated to address compliance with the noise ordinance, materials
for the fencing and the enclosure and compliance with liquor license. Applicants would be required to
submit a site plan for review along with the license application to ensure issues such as emergency
access are satisfactorily addressed.
City Council should provide input on whether license applications should be approved at the staff level
or at the discretion of the City Council.
If approved, at the end of the season staff will report back on the demand for the program, number of
licenses issued, experience of businesses who participated and any complaints that were received.
Council would decide at that point whether or not to make the Temporary Outdoor Patio Ordinance
permanent or other possible next steps.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
If the City Council would like to proceed with the City Code amendment, the item would then be placed
on the March 22, 2022 Council agenda for a public hearing and final action.
Attachments
Draft Ordinance
Draft Temporary Outdoor Patio License Application
CITY OF OAKDALE
ORDINANCE 2022-XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF OAKDALE, CHAPTER 9 –
LICENSES AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The City Council of the City of Oakdale ordains:
Section 1. The Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, is amended to add the following:
Article XVI Temporary Outdoor Patios
Sec. 9-150. Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this Chapter, shall
have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
Temporary Outdoor Patio – A specifically defined outdoor area, operated by a
restaurant or tavern for seasonal outdoor service between April 1 and November 1
in a calendar year, located on an existing sidewalk or parking area.
Sec. 9-151. License Required. No person shall operate a temporary outdoor patio in the city
without first obtaining a license.
Sec. 9-152. Application for; Issuance of License. Application for a license required by this
article shall be made to the City Clerk on a form supplied by the city, a minimum of thirty (30)
days prior to the desired start date. The application shall state the full name and address of
the applicant and be signed by the applicant and the property owner if different; the location
and type of enclosure materials to be used by the applicant under the license; an updated
certificate of insurance for liquor sales, indicating that liquor liability is extended to the
outside of the building premises; and such other information as shall be required by the
application form. The City Council may approve a permit request by a majority vote of all its
members. If approved, a license shall be issued by the City Clerk.
Sec. 9-153. Noise. All businesses must comply with noise ordinances in Sections 19-03, 19-
04(c) and 19-05 of the City Code.
Sec. 9-154. License Fee; Term. The fee for a license required by this article shall be
determined by the City Council. Licenses shall be valid from April 1 to November 1 in the
calendar year for which the license is issued. Licenses issued pursuant to this article shall not
be transferable from one person to another.
Sec. 9-155. License to be Displayed. Every license required by this article shall be kept
conspicuously posted at the location for which the license is issued and shall be exhibited to
any person upon request.
Sec. 9-156. License Revocation. Every license required by this article may be revoked by the
City Council for a violation of any provision of this article, if the licensee has been given a
reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its adoption and
publication and will expire on December 31, 2022, unless further extended by the Oakdale City
Council.
______________________________________
Paul Reinke, Mayor
AYES:
NAYS:
Adopted this 22nd day of March, 2022 by the Oakdale City Council.
Attest:
______________________________________
Kathy Laur, City Clerk
Published:
Text with underline is proposed for insertion.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1584 Hadley Avenue N, Oakdale, MN 55128
Contact: Katie Robinson, Katie.Robinson@ci.oakdale.mn.us
Phone: 651-730-2739 | Fax: 651-730-2818
TEMPORARY OUTDOOR PATIO LICENSE APPLICATION
License Term: April 1 – November 1, 2022
BUSINESS INFORMATION
Business Name:
Business Address:
Contact Person:
Business Phone: Email:
SUBMITTAL MATERIALS
The following materials must be submitted with your application in order to be considered complete. If you have
any questions or concerns regarding the necessary materials please contact Katie Robinson, Licensing/Deputy
Clerk, 651-730-2739 or Katie.Robinson@ci.oakdale.mn.us (AP – Applicant check list, CTY – City check list)
Applicant Address:
AP CTY Materials
Site Plan: A site diagram drawn as close to scale as possible. An aerial photo may be used to draw the
proposed temporary outdoor patio area (search for your property address to find an aerial photo here:
https://tinyurl.com/y9w327qh).
The site plan must show the following:
Placement and size of the outdoor patio (include dimensions of the area in feet)
o Note: all areas for liquor sales must be compact and contiguous with the licensed
premise.
Any proposed changes to vehicle parking spaces and drive aisles. The use of parking lots,
drive lanes, or sidewalks must be safe and secure (enclosed by fences or barricades).
o The outdoor patio area shall not interfere with pedestrian or vehicular movement
through the site or access by emergency vehicles such as fire trucks.
Written Narrative Describing Operation: A written description of your request. The description must
include the following:
Description of the Temporary Outdoor Patio:
o Location
o Access for patrons and staff
o Number of seats and tables
o Type of enclosure materials
o Any additional information needed to describe the request
Business hours for the Temporary Outdoor Patio area
Proposed start and end dates of Temporary Outdoor Patio area
Page 1 of 2
Other information as applicable:
For Liquor Sales: An updated certificate of liability insurance, indicating that liquor liability is
extended to the outside of the building premises. The City of Oakdale must be listed as
additional insured and as the certificate holder
Approval from the Property Owner (if different from the applicant)
Canopies or coverings must demonstrate that they are flame resistant
If outdoor heating is proposed, provide the type of heater and fuel source (propane, electric,
gas, etc.)
Plans and schedule for amplified sound or live music.
All businesses must comply with the noise ordinances in Chapter 19 of the City Code.
Staff may request additional information based on the particular request.
LICENSE APPLICATION APPROVAL PROCESS
The City Council may approve a license request by a majority vote of all its members. If approved, a license shall
be issued by the City Clerk.
SIGNATURE OF BUSINESS OWNER
Business Owner Signature: Date:
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER (IF DIFFERENT FROM THE APPLICANT)
Property Owner Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 2
Get email alerts for Oakdale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.