City Council Study Meeting - ARCHIVED

SOUTH JORDAN CITY CITY COUNCIL STUDY MEETING February 6, 2024 Present: Mayor Dawn R. Ramsey, Council Member Tamara Zander, Council Member Patrick Harris, Council Member Don Shelton, Council Member Tamara Zander, Council Member Jason McGuire, Council Member Kathie Johnson, City Manager Dustin Lewis, Assistant City Manager Jason Rasmussen, City Attorney Ryan Loose, Director of Commerce Brian Preece, Director of Strategy & Budget Don Tingey, Fire Chief Chris Dawson, Director of Administrative Services Melinda Seager, Director of Public Works Raymond Garrison, Director of Recreation Janell Payne, CFO Sunil Naidu, Director of Planning Steven Schaefermeyer, City Engineer Brad Klavano, Deputy Police Chief Rob Hansen, Communications Manager Rachael Van Cleave, Senior Systems Administrator Phill Brown, IT Director Jon Day, City Recorder Anna Crookston, Meeting Transcriptionist Diana Baun, Planning Commissioner Michele Hollist, City Commerce Executive Assistant Ambra Katwyk Absent: Others: Sam Bishop, Ray Wimmer, Fred Philpot 4:52 P.M. STUDY MEETING A. Welcome, Roll Call, and Introduction: By Mayor, Dawn R. Ramsey Mayor Ramsey welcomed everyone present and introduced the meeting. B. Invocation: By Council Member, Jason McGuire Council Member McGuire offered the invocation. C. Mayor and Council Coordination Mayor Ramsey asked the council for any suggestions on additional invitees to the State of the City Address. D. Discussion/Review of Regular Council Meeting Presentation Items: Chinese New Year’s Celebration South Jordan Art’s Council annual update Action Items: Resolution R2024-11, Amending the South Jordan Fee Schedule. Resolution R2024-14, Amending the South Jordan Art’s Council Bylaws. South Jordan City 2 City Council Study Meeting February 6, 2024 Resolution R2024-15, Authorizing an application to the United States Bureau of Reclamation for a matching grant for water conservation projects in the City and affirming the availability of matching city funds. Resolution R2024-17, Appointing a representative to the South Valley Sewer District. Public Hearing Item: Ordinance 2024-04, Vacating a portion of Right-of-Way on the north side of Lake Avenue running east from Watercourse Road approximately 223 feet. E. Presentation Items E.1. Planning Commission member appointment. (By Director of Planning, Steven Schaefermeyer) Director Schaefermeyer and the council discussed his visit to the Capitol to share suggestions on the Moderate Income Housing Plan city requirements, then introduced the two Planning Commission applicants, Ray Wimmer and Sam Bishop. Ray Wimmer introduced himself, he has been a financial planner for the last 16 years and currently serves as a vice president over the Utah region, giving education to participants in 401K plans for companies here in Utah. Previously he was a Special Educator, working in a program for students who had dropped out of high school and wanted to come back to finish their diplomas. He was a Political Science Major and has an interest in this kind of thing, he just wants to help. He has had some friends and neighbors ask him to get involved but he has always been a little hesitant because there is always someone more qualified, but he agreed to do it. He was a foster kid growing up, and lived in a lot of different places, seeing a lot of things that work. He tends to do more listening, gathering feedback from the people around him, and he loves to learn. If he can help he also wants to do that, he wants to make the world a better place. Council Member Shelton noted that he met Mr. Wimmer for the first time at the open house, and while he was not pleased with the idea of the project, he was very articulate and not rude at all. He has spoken with others about him as well, and all comments have been positive towards him. Sam Bishop introduced himself, his father was in the Marine Core for 20 years and he moved around a lot. He sees the environment differently than many people because of his varied experiences. He served a mission in the UK where things are very different, and he lived in Japan for a while as a kid. He considered serving in the military but realized that he wasn’t a good fit, but always looked up to the Marines. As citizens, we need to do our part and that’s our duty. He has attended many of our city meetings because he has a lot of curiosity, which comes with the job of being an engineer. He started coming after Covid calmed down and it was wonderful to come and appreciate the council and staff’s goodness; it was good for his soul. Council Member McGuire thanked Mr. Bishop for his willingness to be involved and learn about the process. All of his interactions with him over the years have been positive, including his efforts with Bennion Gardner in regards to trail and open space improvements. South Jordan City 3 City Council Study Meeting February 6, 2024 Council Member Zander thanked Mr. Bishop for his goodness as well, and for his attendance because he genuinely cares. E.2. Public Safety Impact Fee Study and Business License Fee Study. (By Director of Strategy & Budget, Don Tingey, Director of City Commerce, Brian Preece, & LYRB Vice President, Fred Philpot) Director Tingey gave a brief background of the process and introduced Mr. Philpot. Fred Philpot reviewed his prepared presentation for the Public Safety Impact Fee Study (Attachment A). Council Member Zander asked some clarifying questions regarding the calculations of square footage and whether the annexed land was included. Mr. Philpot explained that this includes the annexed land and continued reviewing Attachment A. Council Member Shelton asked if these fees were collected at building permit, and not assessed on land development. Director Tingey confirmed that yes, the fee is assessed when they apply for their building permit and is calculated with any other fees at that time. Mr. Philpot discussed the option for the development community to provide alternative data to what has been presented here tonight in terms of fee calculation. Mayor Ramsey noted that in the past councils have opted to adopt lower impact fees while recognizing other avenues for filling that gap, and asked if filling that gap would essentially be done through raising taxes. Manager Lewis explained that yes, they have to come up with a way to bring in that additional money and raising taxes is an option for that; however, with impact fees, those creating that impact are paying for the fees, rather than all residents in the city through a property tax raise. Council Member McGuire asked if the school impact fees include the Resource Officers. Mr. Philpot responded that no, that is not included in those calculations. Council Member Zander asked about the disproportionate amount towards care facilities, and if those proposed fees account for additional injuries or services from those facilities. Mr. Philpot responded that when the specific land uses are broken up in the next presentation, you can see that disproportionate effect on a per unit basis. However, these studies are only South Jordan City 4 City Council Study Meeting February 6, 2024 counting volume, they are not looking at the purpose or intensity of those calls. He then moved on to review his prepared presentation on the Business License Fee Study (Attachment B). Council Member Zander asked about whether Mr. Philpot had seen other communities incentivize businesses for lowering their service calls, noting that fees could go up if they don’t take measures to lower calls, or offering lowered fees if they keep their calls at a certain level. Mayor Ramsey, Council and staff discussed options and the council directed staff to go back and decide what makes sense in terms of new fees, as well as getting information on which businesses generate more revenue for the city, and what neighboring cities are doing so we can stay competitive in our licensing. Council Member Johnson motioned to recess the City Council Study Meeting and move to Executive Closed Session. Council Member Zander seconded the motion; vote was 5-0 unanimous in favor. RECESS CITY COUNCIL STUDY MEETING AND MOVE TO EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION F. Executive Closed Session F.1. Discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual. F.2. Discussion of the purchase, exchange or lease of real property. RECESS EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION AND MOVE TO REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Council Member Zander motioned to recess the Executive Closed Session and return after the Regular City Council Meeting. Council Member McGuire seconded the motion; vote was 5-0 unanimous in favor. ADJOURN REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND RETURN TO EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION. Council Member Zander motioned to adjourn the February 6, 2024 City Council Meeting and return to Executive Closed Session. Council Member Johnson seconded the motion; vote was 5-0 unanimous in favor. ADJOURN EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION AND RETURN CITY COUNCIL STUDY MEETING. Council Member McGuire motioned to adjourn the Executive Closed Session and return after the City Council Study Meeting. Council Member Johnson seconded the motion; vote was 5-0 unanimous in favor. South Jordan City 5 City Council Study Meeting February 6, 2024 ADJOURNMENT Council Member Shelton motioned to adjourn the February 6, 2024 City Council Study Meeting. Council Member McGuire seconded the motion; vote was 5-0 unanimous in favor. The February 6, 2024 City Council Study meeting adjourned at 10:13 p.m. This is a true and correct copy of the February 6, 2024 City Council Study Meeting Minutes, which were approved on February 20, 2024. South Jordan City Recorder  Attachment A SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH PUBLIC SAFETY IFFP/IFA FEBRUARY 2024 PURPOSE UTAH CODE 11-36a (IMPACT FEE ACT):  Before imposing an impact fee, each local political subdivision or private entity shall prepare: IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) Identifies the demands placed upon the City’s existing facilities by future development and evaluates how these demands will be met by the City. Outlines the improvements which are intended to be funded by impact fees. IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) Proportionately allocates the cost of the new facilities and any excess capacity to new development, while ensuring that all methods of financing are considered. 2 PROCESS PRESENTATION PRESENTATION IMPACT FEE NOTICE OF PREPARATION PUBLIC HEARING PRESENTATION AND TO ENACTMENT INTENT TO AND NOTICING FOR AND APPROVAL OF FINDINGS TO DISCUSSION ADMINISTRATIVE TAKES EFFECT AMEND IFFP & CERTIFICATION PUBLIC HEARING OF IMPACT FEE STAFF WITH BODY IN WORK 90 DAYS AFTER IFA OF IFFP & IFA ENACTMENT STAKEHOLDERS SESSION APPROVAL 3 METHODOLOGY 1. Service Area and Demand Analysis 2. Provide Inventory of Existing Facilities 3. Establish Existing and Future Level of Service 4. Identify Existing and Future Capital Facilities Necessary to Serve New Growth 5. Consider All Revenue Resources to Finance System Improvements 6. Conduct Proportionate Share Analysis 4 ANALYSIS 1. Service Area and Demand Analysis  City-Wide Service Area Fire Police Fire (Commercial Only) Existing Calls 38,700 6,935 1,917 New Calls for Service 19,058 5,122 1,735 Total Calls Served 57,758 12,057 3,652 5 ANALYSIS 2. Provide Inventory of Existing Facilities Qualifying Equipment Vehicle # Year Make Veh Model Description Purchase Date Purchase Price 7328 2007 PIERCE QUANTUM PUMPER (RESERVE) 8/24/2007 $630,000 5301 2015 PIERCE QUANTUM PUMPER (RESERVE) 7/1/2015 $609,348 5316 2015 PIERCE QUANTUM LADDER (RESERVE) 7/1/2015 $915,000 8302 2018 ROSENBAUER COMMANDER TYPE I PUMPER (ST.64) 2/9/2018 $800,000 1313 2021 PIERCE VELOCITY TYPE I PUMPER (ST.63) 10/27/2020 $800,000 1316 2021 PIERCE VELOCITY LADDER (ST.61) 10/27/2020 $1,484,506 1314 2021 ROSENBAUER COMMANDER TYPE I PUMPER (ST.62) 7/14/2020 $829,000 2025 PIERCE VELOCITY NEW TYPE I PUMPER (ST.64) 12/7/2022 $1,409,689 Impact Fee Eligible $7,477,543 Non-Eligible Equipment Vehicle # Year Make Veh Model Description Purchase Date Purchase Price 7325 2007 FREIGHTLINER M2-TRACTOR 2/22/2007 $137,000 HEAVY RESCUE T7325 2007 HACKNEY TRAILER 2/22/2007 $170,000 Type 6 WILDLAND PUMPER 7302 2017 DODGE 5500 PU 5/1/2017 $125,000 (ST.63) Type 3 WILDLAND PUMPER 9376 2021 SKEETER INTERNATIONAL 7/1/2021 $296,000 (ST.62) Public Safety Building SF Analysis Asset Description Date of Acq Acq Cost Est Useful Life Est Sf Police SF** Fire SF** Public Safety Building 1/1/2019 $11,667,554 50 37,474 23,779 4,987 Fire Station 61 7/1/1994 $1,622,860 50 10,200 - 10,200 Fire Station 62 7/1/2002 $1,397,576 50 12,228 - 12,228 Fire Station 63 5/1/2017 $4,311,709 50 12,645 - 12,645 Fire Station 64* 01/31/22 $12,631,428 50 34,300 3,165 22,995 4 Total $31,631,126 106,847 26,944 63,056 *Excludes City Hall admin space at Station 64. **Excludes courts and administrative space. ANALYSIS 3. Establish Existing and Future Level of Service Police Police Fire Fire Police Square Feet Units Calls LOS Calls LOS Single Family 68,128,560 19,131 17,342 0.91 2,462 0.13 Multifamily 4,094,725 8,584 2,655 0.31 408 0.05 Retail 4,244,385 4,244 5,708 1.34 476 0.11 Office 4,426,850 4,427 1,535 0.35 191 0.04 Industrial 2,354,946 2,355 651 0.28 65 0.03 Schools 910,774 911 394 0.43 34 0.04 Church 553,566 554 275 0.50 42 0.08 Nursing/Assisted Living* 994,899 995 117 0.12 608 0.61 Vacant 184,058 184 369 2.01 65 0.35 Agricultural/Forest/Mining 194,952 195 5 0.02 1 0.01 Other 1,315,495 1,315 5,782 4.40 172 0.13 *Based on analysis from Business License Data 7 ANALYSIS 4. Identify Existing and Future Capital Facilities Necessary to Serve New Growth Allocation of Existing Facilities to Police Total Cost % to Police Cost to Police Public Safety Building $18,026,222 63% $11,438,262 Station 64 $17,090,081 9% $1,577,187 Total $35,116,303 37% $13,015,449 Allocation of Existing Facilities to Fire Total Cost % to Fire Cost to Fire Public Safety Building $18,026,222 13% $2,398,949 Fire Station 61 $1,622,860 100% $1,622,860 Fire Station 62 $1,397,576 100% $1,397,576 Fire Station 63 $4,311,709 100% $4,311,709 Fire Station 64 $17,090,081 67% $11,457,542 Total $42,448,448 50% $21,188,635 Apparatus Total Cost % to Fire Cost to Fire Apparatus Value > $500,000 $7,477,543 100% $7,477,543 8 ANALYSIS 4. Identify Existing and Future Capital Facilities Necessary to Serve New Growth Financing % Impact Fee IFA Eligible Asset Description Const. Cost Total Cost Est Sf Police SF Fire SF Cost Eligible Cost Fire Station 65 $21,881,702 $10,320,177 $32,201,879 100% $32,201,879 22,103 - 22,103 Apparatus Station 65 Engine $848,720 - $848,720 100% $848,720 Demand Served - 2,432 9 ANALYSIS 5. Consider All Revenue Resources to Finance System Improvements  Analysis includes the 2017 Sales Tax Bonds and the 2019 Sales Tax Revenue and Refunding Bonds  Analysis assumes Station 65 will need to be financed • Analysis assumes a 20-year maturity with 4% coupon 10 ANALYSIS 6. Conduct Proportionate Share Analysis % to Cost to Impact % to Cost to Total Police Facilities Total Cost Cost per Call IFFP Fees Growth Growth Calls Existing Stations and Facilities $35,116,303 37% $13,015,449 33% $4,294,621 19,058 $225 Future Stations $32,201,879 0% - 33% - 19,058 - Professional Expense $6,000 100% $6,000 100% $6,000 10,268 $1 Facilities Impact Fee Cost $67,324,182 $13,021,449 $4,300,621 $226 % to Cost to % to Cost to Calls Fire Facilities Total Cost Cost per Call IFFP Impact Fees Growth Growth Served Existing Stations and Facilities $42,448,448 50% $21,188,635 26% $5,501,309 2,432 $2,262 Future Stations $32,201,879 100% $32,201,879 26% $8,360,731 2,432 $3,438 Professional Expense $6,000 100% $6,000 100% $6,000 1,840 $3 Facilities Impact Fee Cost $74,656,326 $53,396,514 $13,868,040 $5,703 Apparatus Existing Apparatus $7,477,543 100% $7,477,543 48% $3,552,013 1,735 $2,047 New Apparatus $848,720 100% $848,720 48% $403,162 1,735 $232 Total Apparatus $8,326,263 $8,326,263 $3,955,175 $2,280 Facilities + Apparatus $7,983 11 ANALYSIS 6. Conduct Proportionate Share Analysis Cost per Calls per Police Impact Fee Police Call Unit per Unit Single Family (per unit) $226 0.91 $204.80 Multi-Family (per unit) $226 0.31 $69.87 Commercial (per 1,000 SF) $226 1.34 $303.82 Office (per 1,000 SF) $226 0.35 $78.36 Industrial (per 1,000 SF) $226 0.28 $62.47 School (per 1,000 SF) $226 0.43 $97.63 Church (per 1,000 SF) $226 0.50 $112.38 Nursing Home (per 1,000 SF) $226 1.65 $26.48 Cost per Calls per Fire Impact Fee Fire Call Unit per Unit Single Family (per unit) $5,703 0.13 $734.04 Multi-Family (per unit) $5,703 0.05 $271.32 Commercial (per 1,000 SF) $7,983 0.11 $895.32 Office (per 1,000 SF) $7,983 0.04 $344.24 Industrial (per 1,000 SF) $7,983 0.03 $221.16 School (per 1,000 SF) $7,983 0.04 $296.51 Church (per 1,000 SF) $7,983 0.08 $609.81 12 Nursing Home (per 1,000 SF) $7,983 0.61 $4,876.24 ANALYSIS 6. Conduct Proportionate Share Analysis Combined Max Existing Fee $ Change Single Family (per unit) $938.84 $567.31 $371.53 Multi-Family (per unit) $341.19 $192.92 $148.27 Commercial (per 1,000 SF) $1,199.14 $795.15 $403.99 Office (per 1,000 SF) $422.60 $339.05 $83.55 Industrial (per 1,000 SF) $283.63 $163.31 $120.32 School (per 1,000 SF) $394.15 $224.45 $169.70 Church (per 1,000 SF) $722.19 $218.20 $503.99 Nursing Home (per 1,000 SF) $4,902.72 $2,672.21 $2,230.51 13 NEXT STEPS  Finalize IFFP/IFA  Notice for public hearing  Publish documents  Hold public hearing 14 QUESTIONS Fred Philpot | Vice President/COO LRB Public Finance Advisors O 801.596.0700 | C801.243.0293 lrbfinance.com Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham is now LRB Public Finance Advisors  Attachment B SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH BUSINESS LICENSE COST OF SERVICE STUDY FEBRUARY 2024 PURPOSE UCA 10-1-203:  The legislative body of a municipality may license for the purpose of regulation any business within the limits of the municipality, may regulate that business by ordinance, and may impose fees on businesses to recover the municipality's costs of regulation.  The legislative body of a municipality may by ordinance raise revenue by levying and collecting a license fee or tax on:  a business that causes disproportionate costs of municipal services; or  a purchaser from a business for which the municipality provides an enhanced level of municipal services.  Required to adopt an ordinance defining for purposes of the fee including:  The basic level of municipal services; and  The costs of providing an enhanced level of municipal services in the municipality.  The fee shall be reasonably related to the costs of providing an enhanced level of the municipal services. 2 LIMITATIONS UCA 10-1-203:  A municipality may not:  require a license or permit for a business that is operated:  only occasionally; and  by an individual who is under 18 years old;  Charge any fee for a resident of the municipality to operate a home-based business, unless the combined offsite impact of the home-based business and the primary residential use materially exceeds the offsite impact of the primary residential use alone;  Require, as a condition of obtaining or maintaining a license or permit for a business:  That an employee or agent of a business complete education, continuing education, or training that is in addition to requirements under state law or state licensing requirements; or  That a business disclose financial information, inventory amounts, or proprietary business information, except as specifically authorized under state or federal law.  Notwithstanding Subsection (7)(b), a municipality may charge an administrative fee for a license to a home-based business owner who is otherwise exempt under Subsection (7)(b) but who requests a license from the municipality. 3 PROCESS Fee Analysis Task 1: Cost Analysis Task 2: Process Analysis Base Employee Cost Coordination with Staff Regarding Tasks Department Overhead Cost Create/Update Process Maps Administrative Overhead Cost Join with Cost Analysis Disproportionate Service Costs (Business Licensing) Establish Fee 4 COST ANALYSIS  Analysis of current and projected budgets to determine base costs, department overhead, and administrative overhead costs:  Base costs include employee salaries and benefits  Department overhead costs include general costs to operate each department  Administrative overhead costs include the cost of the services provided to all departments (i.e. legislative, executive and administrative costs) 5 PROCESS ANALYSIS  Creation of Process Maps: Commercial General License Example STEP ACTION HOURS PERSONNEL INVOLVED # 1 Application Review/Classification/Fee Calculation 0.12 Ambra Holland 2 Building Review 0.50 Ty Montalvo 3 Code Compliance Review 0.25 Audrey Cullimore 4 Fire Review 0.33 Russ Avery 5 Planning Review 0.25 David Mann 6 Police Review 0.25 Jeanene Clark 7 Public Works Review 0.50 Justin Blake 8 Utilities Review 0.08 Kailey Densley 9 External Agency Review 0.17 Ambra Holland 10 Verify Final Review 0.08 Ambra Holland 11 Issue Business License 0.03 Ambra Holland TOTAL 2.56 6 PROCESS ANALYSIS  Proposed Fees (Preliminary Draft) Summary Base License Fees Proposed Cost Current Fee Commercial General License $262.81 $194.00 Commercial Business - Big Box (>80,000 sq. ft.) $278.86 $194 (base) Commercial Business - Department Store $326.08 $194 (base) Residential Rentals $278.86 $119 (base) Commercial Business - Salon Chair/Vending $24.43 $92 (base) Commercial Temporary (fireworks - outdoor sales only) $186.30 $194 (base) Commercial Temporary (except fireworks) $141.20 $194 (base) Commercial Sexually Oriented Business $417.53 $2,122.00 Commercial Business License (non-cosmetology, no fire inspection required) $52.04 No Current Fee Commercial Business License - Model Home $69.92 No Current Fee Alochol License $131.76 $194 (base) Mobile Food Vendor License $78.62 No Current Fee No Current Fee $25.13 Mobile Non-Food Vendor License Home Occupation Business License $125.64 $200.00 Home Occupation+ Business License $197.36 $200 (base) $75 for fire inspection $75 for fire inspection BUSINESS NAME CHANGE $6.98 $20.00 Renewals (monthly) $22.33 $30.00 Delinquent Renewals (monthly) $18.84 Prorated 7 DISPROPORTIONATE ANALYSIS  Analysis Considers Disproportionate Impacts from Public Safety  Process: o Determine Cost per Call  Establish Baseline Level of Service (LOS) o Residential vs. Commercial  Calculate Disproportionate Fees by Business Group 8 DISPROPORTIONATE ANALYSIS Fire Call Police Call Number of Alt Demand Disproportionate Disproportionate Ratio w/o Ratio w/o Businesses Unit Impact Impact Outliers Outliers Accountant/Bookkeeping 19.00 1.53 0.22 2.89 - Assisted Living/Nursing 11.00 946.00 43.91 42.60 3.73 - Big Box 8.00 10.13 8.82 124.88 117.29 Department Store 4.00 4.50 3.20 40.25 32.67 Car Wash 7.00 0.14 - 8.71 1.13 Cosmetology/Grooming 177.00 2.42 1.11 4.15 - Counseling/Psychology 49.00 0.16 - 16.78 9.19 Distribution 8.00 - - 10.75 3.17 Electronics 1.00 - - 11.00 3.42 Engineering 14.00 0.07 - 34.21 26.63 Entertainment/Recreation 4.00 4.00 2.70 30.75 23.17 Financial/Credit 35.00 0.17 - 8.46 0.87 Funeral 1.00 2.00 0.70 - - Golf Course 1.00 2.00 0.70 1.00 - Grocery Store 8.00 2.00 0.70 3.25 - Group/Treatment 8.00 2.50 1.20 3.88 - Health Insurance 1.00 - - 28.00 20.42 Hotel 7.00 13.29 11.98 11.29 3.70 Internet 3.00 2.33 1.03 4.00 - Mail Services 4.00 3.00 1.70 4.75 - Medical Supply Manufacture 4.00 2.75 1.45 2.00 - Pet Grooming 4.00 - - 33.50 25.92 Physical Fitness/Sports 22.00 1.27 - 91.91 84.33 Property Management 13.00 7.15 5.85 2.54 - Rentals/Leasing 19.00 4.21 2.91 7.21 - Restaurant 95.00 0.79 - 14.24 6.66 Restaurant Full Service 14.00 0.64 - 10.14 2.56 Screenprinting 2.00 - - 10.00 2.42 Tavern 1.00 - - 11.00 3.42 Travel/Travel Agency 6.00 - - 16.33 8.75 Tumbling/Gymnastics 1.00 9.00 7.70 53.00 45.42 Total 1,404 9 DISPROPORTIONATE ANALYSIS Estimated Fire Est. Estimated Police Est. Combined Fee # of Bus. Est. Revenue Fee Revenue Fee Revenue Accountant/Bookkeeping $403 $7,659 $0 $0 $403 19.00 $7,659 Assisted Living/Nursing $902 $852,945 $0 $0 $77,540 11.00 $852,945 Big Box $16,053 $128,423 $43,010 $344,080 $59,063 8.00 $472,502 Department Store $5,815 $23,261 $11,978 $47,914 $17,794 4.00 $71,175 Car Wash $0 $0 $414 $2,901 $414 7.00 $2,901 Cosmetology/Grooming $2,026 $358,621 $0 $0 $2,026 177.00 $358,621 Counseling/Psychology $0 $0 $3,370 $165,153 $3,370 49.00 $165,153 Distribution $0 $0 $1,161 $9,288 $1,161 8.00 $9,288 Electronics $0 $0 $1,253 $1,253 $1,253 1.00 $1,253 Engineering $0 $0 $9,765 $136,712 $9,765 14.00 $136,712 Entertainment/Recreation $4,905 $19,621 $8,495 $33,979 $13,400 4.00 $53,600 Financial/Credit $0 $0 $320 $11,206 $320 35.00 $11,206 Funeral $1,265 $1,265 $0 $0 $1,265 1.00 $1,265 Golf Course $1,265 $1,265 $0 $0 $1,265 1.00 $1,265 Grocery Store $1,265 $10,122 $0 $0 $1,265 8.00 $10,122 Group/Treatment $2,175 $17,402 $0 $0 $2,175 8.00 $17,402 Health Insurance $0 $0 $7,486 $7,486 $7,486 1.00 $7,486 Hotel $21,805 $152,638 $1,357 $9,502 $23,163 7.00 $162,139 Internet $1,872 $5,616 $0 $0 $1,872 3.00 $5,616 Mail Services $3,085 $12,341 $0 $0 $3,085 4.00 $12,341 Medical Supply Manufacture $2,630 $10,521 $0 $0 $2,630 4.00 $10,521 Pet Grooming $0 $0 $9,503 $38,013 $9,503 4.00 $38,013 Physical Fitness/Sports $0 $0 $30,922 $680,274 $30,922 22.00 $680,274 Property Management $10,645 $138,389 $0 $0 $10,645 13.00 $138,389 Rentals/Leasing $5,288 $100,479 $0 $0 $5,288 19.00 $100,479 Restaurant $0 $0 $2,441 $231,940 $2,441 95.00 $231,940 Restaurant Full Service $0 $0 $938 $13,136 $938 14.00 $13,136 Screenprinting $0 $0 $886 $1,772 $886 2.00 $1,772 Tavern $0 $0 $1,253 $1,253 $1,253 1.00 $1,253 Travel/Travel Agency $0 $0 $3,208 $19,250 $3,208 6.00 $19,250 Tumbling/Gymnastics $14,005 $14,005 $16,654 $16,654 $30,659 1.00 $30,659 Total 1,404.00 $3,646,267 10 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS  Study does not consider other revenues generated by business activity  Sales Taxes  Property Taxes  Increasing disproportionate fees may result in unintended consequences  Failure to report criminal activity  Reduce economic activity 11 NEXT STEPS  Finalize analysis and fee recommendations  Complete final revenue analysis  Adopt proposed fees 12 QUESTIONS Fred Philpot | Vice President/COO LRB Public Finance Advisors O 801.596.0700 | C801.243.0293 lrbfinance.com Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham is now LRB Public Finance Advisors